You are a normal user and have full disk encryption. You must have read the
man page on how to do that? Found the installer option did you. I have read
several books on openbsd and all the man pages I could find and didn't find
out how to do it anywhere else other that how to webpages.
On Dec 21, 2
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:04:55AM +0800, Tinker wrote:
> On 2015-12-22 03:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:31:58AM +0800, Tinker wrote:
> >
> >>Hi, on my 4GB RAM machine, top says
> >>
> >>"Memory: Real: 1293M/3786M act/tot Free: 158M Cache: 2079M Swap:
> >>449M/10G"
> >>
>
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell
wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 12:37:30 -0800
> Philip Guenther wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell
>> wrote:
>> > I've a question about last/utmp/wtmp that someone here should be
>> > able to answer.
>> >
I have actually made some progress on this serial port card! I looked at how
FreeBSD has it configured, tried to map the values to the OpenBSD struct, and
actually got something working!
I added the following to pcidevs:
vendor PERLE 0x155f Perle
vendor COMTROL 0x11fe Com
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:41:18 +
"Read, James C" wrote:
> > Well there you go. Get to it. See you in 10 years.
>
> Seriously, though. The thought must have crossed your mind at least
> once during all these years of mopping up the mess that MS/Intel seem
> to have concocted over the years.
> To be fair, i'd love to see the OpenBSD approach to software development
> applied to BIOS/EFI firmware.
>
> For a start, it wouldn't have the nightmare that is Intel AMT sitting below
> the OS and offering a massive security hole.
Gareth,
The OpenBSD process is quite well understood. Use the
To be fair, i'd love to see the OpenBSD approach to software development
applied to BIOS/EFI firmware.
For a start, it wouldn't have the nightmare that is Intel AMT sitting below
the OS and offering a massive security hole.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> > Seriously, th
> Seriously, though. The thought must have crossed your mind at least once
> during all these years of mopping up the mess that MS/Intel seem to have
> concocted over the years.
>
> I wonder what a hardware system designed by BSD bootloader, kernel and driver
> hackers would look like. I should exp
> By any chance is there a handy list of the utilities compiled into bsd.rd
> (release or recent snap)?
This varies architecture by architecture. Look for files called list
or list*, inside distrib/ARCH/... subdirectories. The specific
location of those files varies, it is not completely clean.
> Well there you go. Get to it. See you in 10 years.
Seriously, though. The thought must have crossed your mind at least once
during all these years of mopping up the mess that MS/Intel seem to have
concocted over the years.
I wonder what a hardware system designed by BSD bootloader, kernel and
>On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:45:15 + "AHLSENGIRARD, EDWARD F CTR USAF AFMC
AFNWC/NDBD" wrote:
>> By any chance is there a handy list of the utilities compiled into
>> bsd.rd (release or recent snap)?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Edward Ahlsen-Girard
>>
>it may not be exhaustive but the kernel is compiled from /
Feel free to reject the below without comment if these changes are not
deemed improvements:
--- faq4.html.orig2015-12-20 21:56:34.565914000 +0100
+++ faq4.html2015-12-21 23:33:22.311786584 +0100
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
4.1 - Overview of the OpenBSD installation procedure
-OpenBSD has long be
Hello Karel,
exactly this I guessed :(
Mmh, any idea how can be dealt with crypto raid and a kinda ccd?
Regards Uwe
On 21. Dec 22:58:27, Karel Gardas wrote:
> Hello Uwe,
>
> IIRC softraid0 also saves disk size as a part of its metadata. I'm not
> sure if metadata gets updated when you change j
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:45:15 + "AHLSENGIRARD, EDWARD F CTR USAF AFMC
AFNWC/NDBD" wrote:
> By any chance is there a handy list of the utilities compiled into bsd.rd
> (release or recent snap)?
>
>
> --
> Edward Ahlsen-Girard
>
it may not be exhaustive but the kernel is compiled from /usr/s
Hello Uwe,
IIRC softraid0 also saves disk size as a part of its metadata. I'm not
sure if metadata gets updated when you change just partition/disklabel
size, but I would not expect it.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Uwe Werler wrote:
> Hello Ted,
>
> this is exactly my problem - i can't chan
By any chance is there a handy list of the utilities compiled into bsd.rd
(release or recent snap)?
--
Edward Ahlsen-Girard
Hello Ted,
this is exactly my problem - i can't change the disk boundaries at the
softraid disk. I tried it with saving the disklabel of softraid0/sd0 and
editing manually - with no success. Any ideas?
Regards Uwe
On 21. Dec 16:05:28, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Uwe Werler wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
>
Uwe Werler wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> is it currently possible to resize/increase a crypto raid anyhow? I tested it
> with a virtual disk image via vnconfig - created an image file, attached it
> via vnconfig, created a raid partition and configured a raid with crypto
> discipline. Later I increased
Hello list,
is it currently possible to resize/increase a crypto raid anyhow? I tested it
with a virtual disk image via vnconfig - created an image file, attached it
via vnconfig, created a raid partition and configured a raid with crypto
discipline. Later I increased the image and adopted the par
Great, thanks. I was about to make a diff for the -T template section
below that and change "and percentage of disk" to "and percentage of
remaining space", but that certainly clarifies it.
Brian Conway
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:16:31PM +0
On 2015-12-22 03:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:31:58AM +0800, Tinker wrote:
Hi, on my 4GB RAM machine, top says
"Memory: Real: 1293M/3786M act/tot Free: 158M Cache: 2079M Swap:
449M/10G"
All the five first columns vary over time, in particular the first
four.
3786 +
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:16:31PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 09:30:12AM -0600, Brian Conway wrote:
>
> > I'm hoping someone can enlighten me, as I think I'm misunderstanding
> > the man page.
> >
> > I'm using a simplified test case with a 12 GB disk and a template of
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:31:58AM +0800, Tinker wrote:
> Hi, on my 4GB RAM machine, top says
>
> "Memory: Real: 1293M/3786M act/tot Free: 158M Cache: 2079M Swap: 449M/10G"
>
> All the five first columns vary over time, in particular the first four.
>
> 3786 + 158 = 3944 is fairly close to 4GB
> I don't need a special need case. I have already configured the system
> I need, but it would have been nice to know about these configuration
> options earlier.
Just curious, if you have already a configured system why you then
complain about things like that ? The entry point for OpenBSD is RT
Read, James C wrote:
> >Also, BIOS functions are traditionally coded only powerful enough bootup
> style operation.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by 'powerful enough'. Somebody who installs OpenBSD
> and cannot access the internet now has a double problem 1) he can't access the
> internet 2) he t
Hi, on my 4GB RAM machine, top says
"Memory: Real: 1293M/3786M act/tot Free: 158M Cache: 2079M Swap:
449M/10G"
All the five first columns vary over time, in particular the first four.
3786 + 158 = 3944 is fairly close to 4GB so I guess that's the amount of
RAM that the BIOS (+HW drivers?) ac
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Read, James C wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by 'powerful enough'. Somebody who installs OpenBSD
> and cannot access the internet now has a double problem 1) he can't access the
> internet 2) he therefore can't search online for information about how to fix
>
> Somebody who installs OpenBSD and cannot access the internet now has a
> double problem 1) he can't access the internet 2) he therefore can't
> search online for information about how to fix the problem.
IF you're installing a new and unknown OS on your only Internet-capable
device - you are *as
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:19:38PM +, Read, James C wrote:
The more I look into this the more I start to think that I wasn't being
extreme enough when I decided it would be easier to build my OS than play
around with everyone else's. It now seems what I should have decided was to
build my own
I don't need a special need case. I have already configured the system
I need, but it would have been nice to know about these configuration
options earlier. It was only because of Linux that I became aware of
some of the stuff like what vlc is and I fooled around with Web pages
and virtual HDs eno
> >Because the kernel cannot know what memory it should leave untouched,
> >to use such BIOS functions.
>
> Why not? I understand that there is some degree of variance amongst BIOS
> uaage of memory but the upper bounds seem to be clearly defined (if I am not
> misinformed). And surely it would be
> Back about 2008 I had my own way of downloading and installing, still
> with the stock installer. I'd download some files and put them on a
> CD, using the install floppy image as a boot image. Boot the CD as a
> floppy, shell out and mount it as a CD, then go back and install from
> a mounted
>Because the kernel cannot know what memory it should leave untouched,
>to use such BIOS functions.
Why not? I understand that there is some degree of variance amongst BIOS usage
of memory but the upper bounds seem to be clearly defined (if I am not
misinformed). And surely it would be possible to
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 09:30:12AM -0600, Brian Conway wrote:
> I'm hoping someone can enlighten me, as I think I'm misunderstanding
> the man page.
>
> I'm using a simplified test case with a 12 GB disk and a template of
> the following:
> / 256M
> swap 256M
> /tmp 256M
> /var 256M
> /usr
> >> > Usability means then it should be not only humans but also programs
> >> > who are able to interact with the installer. So, since stream editors
> >> > know nothing about this seasons' (or Luddite's) line drawing symbols,
> >> > and users barely see the information between these on another
This has gone wildly off-topic, please take it off list
--
A fool must now and then be right by chance.
> Luke Small
> >[...] It would be very easy to write a C
> >program to parse and edit fstab to make all the partitions softdep. I
> >wouldn't know how to automate a disklabel call in the way that
> >https://www.vultr.com/docs/setup-openbsd-5-6-with-full-disk-encryption
> >perfo
> > Usability means then it should be not only humans but also programs
> > who are able to interact with the installer. So, since stream editors
> > know nothing about this seasons' (or Luddite's) line drawing symbols,
> > and users barely see the information between these on another terminal
> >
On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 20:34:39 -0600 Luke Small
> I haven't really done a fresh install since 4.8 .
Not much point making installer suggestions then, you just don't use
it. You complain your feel for a lack of hand holding experience in
a fool proof solution would be the one to sort your problem.
I can't resist jumping in. I see what y'all are saying but have you
considered the possibility of multiple installers? The standard
officially supported and maintained one that's guaranteed to work.
Others, clearly labelled as contributed works, buried in sysutils and
maybe on github that have co
I'm hoping someone can enlighten me, as I think I'm misunderstanding
the man page.
I'm using a simplified test case with a 12 GB disk and a template of
the following:
/ 256M
swap 256M
/tmp 256M
/var 256M
/usr 5.5G-* 80%
/home 1G-* 20%
Based on how I'm reading the man page, disklabel sho
I haven't really done a fresh install since 4.8 . I didn't know the
partitions were mounted . I don't see a problem with making the operating
system user friendly enough that the only command line you really need to
do is maybe "pkg_add -u" or pkg_add for installing new software. If they
want to ru
I suspect that there could be a number of minor implementation tweaks that
could be addressed that would be convenient to avoid presumably to
streamline the install process for folks that would prefer to avoid an
incessant procession of questions.
There are other features that inexperienced users
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:41:22AM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Problem is still here with Dec 16 snapshot.
>
> Dec 17 13:08:20 server /bsd: OpenBSD 5.8-current (GENERIC.MP) #1494: Wed Dec
> 16 12:13:03 MST 2015
> Dec 17 13:08:20 server /bsd:
> dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, li...@wrant.com wrote:
>> > Usability means then it should be not only humans but also programs
>> > who are able to interact with the installer. So, since stream editors
>> > know nothing about this seasons' (or Luddite's) line drawing symbols,
>> > and users barely see the i
Luke Small wrote:
>[...] It would be very easy to write a
> C
>program to parse and edit fstab to make all the partitions softdep. I
>wouldn't know how to automate a disklabel call in the way that
>https://www.vultr.com/docs/setup-openbsd-5-6-with-full-disk-encryption
>performs
I was wondering what would be the equivalent of Alias in the new httpd.conf
For example, I have
Alias /Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync /var/www/htdocs/horde/rpc.php
in /var/www/conf/httpd.conf with apache-httpd-openbsd-1.3.20140502p4.
With the new httpd, I tried stuff like
location "/Microsoft-Se
Hi,
Problem is still here with Dec 16 snapshot.
Dec 17 13:08:20 server /bsd: OpenBSD 5.8-current (GENERIC.MP) #1494: Wed
Dec 16 12:13:03 MST 2015
Dec 17 13:08:20 server /bsd:
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
Dec 17 13:08:20 server /bsd: cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(
2015-12-20 19:11 GMT+01:00 Tati Chevron :
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 06:24:26PM +0100, ropers wrote:
>
>> But if I want to make my own bootable Blu-ray disc, for a single
>> architecture,
>>
> using the files on the discs I purchased, is it necessary, for example,
> to master it with the distributi
49 matches
Mail list logo
