Hello from Alberta (waving to Theo, Bob, and others),
This email was meant to be short, but it is long. I apologize. Sigh.
I have a few dumb 100MHZ to 133MHZ AMD 486/586 portable computers with
PCMCIA cards and 8MB-56MB of RAM that I'm absolutely determined to turn
into OpenBSD servers this
Marco Peereboom wrote:
If you can't neboot the best way of getting it going is using the hdd in
one chassis for install and then move it to the desired machine
afterwards. This is way easier in openbsd than in linux.
This is what I will do right now on a 16MB machine just for the
Nick Holland wrote:
If you can't neboot the best way of getting it going is using the hdd in
one chassis for install and then move it to the desired machine
afterwards. This is way easier in openbsd than in linux.
This is what I will do right now on a 16MB machine just for the
When I reply to the group.. it puts the person's address and the groups
address in TO/CC fields.
Is it possible for the server to just send mail to the TO field to the
group only, and not have a CC ?
Is this on purpose, so that incase the list is ever down, the person
gets the mail anyway?
I wrote:
Has anyone made a cute ncurses style installer for openbsd, BTW? I
don't need one personally.. the script did its job well. But it might
make OpenBSD more popular if some cute newbieish TUI (text user
interface) installer was available.
Replying to myself..
RTFA (read the effing
Nick Holland wrote:
L wrote:
On my mailing lists that I manage I always turn this option off.. so
that anyone who replies to the list only replies to the list but not the
actual person too.
Not a big deal, just wondering if this is by design and on purpose
Sometimes, people WISH
Julian Leyh wrote:
On 20:59 Sun 02 Dec , L wrote:
I can't find the 'reply only to group' feature my mail client yet.. but I
just started using this email client recently. It is Mozilla Thunderbird.
Try mutt... it has a nice list-reply function :)
Regards,
Julian
I was using Sylpheed
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
It is a dynamic executable and LDD in linux says it requires:
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7eac000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7feb000)
Inside the /emul/linux/ folder in
L wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
..but does not have anything stating 'core dump' is available.
How do I go about debugging this?
p.s. I tried elf2olf -o linux on the program
This helped with the static program.. it got that working
L wrote:
I wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
..but does not have anything stating 'core dump' is available.
How do I go about debugging this?
Now I tried KTRACE/KDUMP..
And it says..
3640 ktrace RET ktrace 0
3640 ktrace CALL
I wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
..but does not have anything stating 'core dump' is available.
How do I go about debugging this?
Now I tried KTRACE/KDUMP..
And it says..
3640 ktrace RET ktrace 0
3640 ktrace CALL
L wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
ktrace ./prog
ktrace -C
kdump
28631 ktrace RET ktrace 0
28631 ktrace CALL execve(...hex crap...)
28631 ktrace NAMI ./prog
28631 ktrace NAMI /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Just talking to myself again.. sorry..
Maybe the NAMI should be looking
L wrote:
Just talking to myself again.. sorry..
Maybe the NAMI should be looking in /emul/linux/lib but it is trying /lib/
??
Aha.. it works if I make a folder called /lib and copy the ld-linux.so.2
library there.. so basically my question is how to get it to think the
/lib is /emul/linux
Hello,
I just plugged in some USB devices into my old 133Mhz laptop with
OpenBSD on it and they magically work. These devices would not work
and/or had problems on Winblows with the laptop.. yet on the desktop
they USB devices worked fine. So as I say.. compliments, and thanks.
Question
I noticed way back with 3.8 that netstat would sometimes hang on me
for a very long time (over two minutes) before spitting out the Active
Internet Connections list; once it shows that though, it shows the
rest of the lists in an instant. I thought it was just a fluke so I
ignored it. But now
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
In regards to RMS, I have yet to see critique of his ideas, especially n
the mainstream media.
Some infamous 'mainstream media' critique:
http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Please-Stop-Using-GNU-Licenses
Richard Stallman wrote:
Why don't you ask Theo, whom you once praised, about OpenBSD?
Because he tends to be unfriendly.
Assuming and/or judging that someone is unfriendly, is an unfriendly act
itself. Publicly stating on a mailing list that someone 'tends' to be
unfriendly is a
Not calling someone unfriendly and just focusing on the
conversation/technical details at hand, would be much more friendly..
even considering friendship wasn't the subject of discussion in the
first place.
Someone else attacked me on this list for not discussing this with
David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Hell, the OpenBSD ports tree should perhaps contain patches which
REMOVE such commercial operating system support. That's a fork
Richard would surely approve of.
Richard, your pants are full of hypocritical poo.
I have no doubt that in some context
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Well, no, you may. The problem is when two people sling poop on each
other,
sooner or later it ends, and then all you've got is two guys standing
there looking
sheepish, all covered with poop.
How is this my fault?
It's not your fault. You're still standing
David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
However, I never thought I would have to remind you that BSD IS a
complete OS, kernel and userland standing on his two feets by itself
in one place.
BSD has and still does depend on GCC.
Has anyone on the OpenBSD devel team reviewed the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, and by the way, I'm not a real man.
Actually I'm not a man at all.
Not all people who are in software are men.
This an interesting point..
I came up with a solution and also wrote it down here:
Deanna Phillips wrote:
Yee will find it interesting if yee is a uman.
Har, har.
Just use they.
The problem with they is..
They are coming over.
: Oh, are they?
No. It's just one person!
: But you said they?
Yes.. I said they are coming over.
: You mean they is coming over?
No, they
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Yee will find it interesting if yee is a uman.
No need to invent yet another kind of wheel, in my eyes.
S/he will find it interesting if s/he is a wo/man.
This contains the obnoxious GNU/Linux slash.
Yee and uman is superior.
(GNU/Linux should really be called:
Earlier -
http://www.nabble.com/Real-men-don%27t-attack-straw-men-tp14256924r0p14344642.html
- Richard appears to have explained how when free software programs support
already-known non-free operating systems, that will not lead to people not
already using those OS to start using them - but by
Earlier -
http://www.nabble.com/Real-men-don%27t-attack-straw-men-tp14256924r0p14344642.html
- Richard appears to have explained how when free software programs
support
already-known non-free operating systems, that will not lead to
people not
already using those OS to start using them - but
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 02:17:46PM -0600, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
For GPL-licensed software I recommend the term covenant(ed)
software. So-called free software, as rms uses the term, is
totally dependent on the GPL, which leverages the State's monopoly on
violence
The GPL is merely a covenant license which closes the (mathmatical
definition alike) ring of Free Software so all operations don't create a
derivate outside that definition.
Ring of Stallmanism, not free software.
Operations that use Free Software and result in non-Free Software
(outside
Ring of Stallmanism, not free software.
Brainwashing Includes the Acceptance of Conflicting Information
TEST: If you believe government social programs can eliminate poverty
you are brainwashed.
Brainwashed Individuals Can Have Obsessive Compulsive Debating Disorder
Brainwashers Have a
Language Wars!
This thread was discussing C vs Ada vs Java etc. Even Borland VCL was
brought up. Yes the VCL was written in Delphi/Pascal and the borland C++
compilers can link to modern pascal code. Why? Because modern pascal and
C languages are actually quite similar today with regards to
Brian Hansen wrote:
Hi.
This is partly not OpenBSD related, and yet again someone pointed out that
perhaps a lot of bug could be avoided using C++. I am writting my big paper
on C and C++ and would like some comments from people who are experts.
Off-list is okay, but maybe others are
Tony Abernethy wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 12/27/07, Miod Vallat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, but no C++ bashing thread can be complete until someone
mentions the
excellent FQA site: http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/
this one alone was priceless:
Richard Stallman wrote:
I'm curious how you can recomend an OS, like gNewSense that only runs on
non-free hardware, that
has required non-free software to be used in it's creation?
How do you do these things? Perhaps I do them the same way.
The term non-free hardware is
Paul Greidanus wrote:
Hi Richard,
I've been marginally following the discussion on OpenBSD and FSF and
of the noise related.
Speaking of FSF.. What if I want to start MY OWN foundation that
guarantees 7 freedoms, or 2 freedoms according to my personal opinion
and philosophy on freedom?
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:04:44AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:53:26PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Since I'm (at least) smart enough not to install proprietary software,
I don't have a strong problem with it, but for
L wrote:
GCC for ms WIndows does not even REQUIRE thinking first. Everyone
knows GCC is a great Windows Proprietary compiler to create
proprietary software.. it's just a cheaper compiler than MS VC. It
is so easy to get or make GCC on windows, because Stallman knows
his figurehead
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
le that have an OpenBSD CD to install the OS have the chance to use
MORE free software than before.
That's got nothing to do with what was talked about. It's not about the
OpenBSD cd, but about having ...
http://www.openbsd.org/4.2_packages/i386.html
Marco Peereboom wrote:
This list is actually the first place I read of widespread use of GCC
for making proprietary software. Since so many lies are said about what
RMS promotes or not, I don't feel confident in taking your word for it
(specially since you seem to resort easily into insults).
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:34:24PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
It would be nice if people would stop defending non defensible
hypocritical positions. His arguments are a misleading hyperbole.
Your attitude is also indefensible and ostentiously
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
know what proprietary means. if you don't
understand the big words, stop using them. you also totally failed to
comprehend the license.
No, I understood it quite well.
Yes, no I did not understood it nor not quite never well.
what i find even more
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Neither do you
that's insulting.
Just FYI about security of deleted data..
I purchase used computers for parts every so often. Many of them have
working hard drives in them.
For fun, I analyze the hard drive out and see what I can find.. just as
a little game of mine.
When I run my undelete/recovery tools on them I can
Todd Alan Smith wrote:
When someone asked him how to make a living of IT without using or
promoting non-free software, his answer was that you don't have to
work in the IT field to contribute to free software, and he'd prefer see
a kernel contributor being a taxi driver than administrating
And as a gardener, I'm not sure software will
be my first source of problems.
L, the above quoted text is not mine. You need to be more careful in
the configuration of your replies. I, for one, would appreciate it.
Todd
Sincere apologies..
It was a double and your name should
The sad thing is you are being more careful with your system design than
your bank probably is. :-/ By the time you are running OpenBSD on your
banking computer, I suspect you have shifted the primary risk to the
other end of the wire...your bank is a bigger risk to your data than you
are.
It was shareware/trialware and I am looking for the name of it...
usually it is right on my Wiki when I make notes.. but I can't find it
there yet.
L505
Kasper Revsbech wrote:
Are you willing to share the names of those programs ?
Kind regards
Kasper
L wrote:
One thing I found
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you answer my mail Rui ?
You are a
Unix Fan wrote:
As I've said, I think it's acceptable for free applications to run on
non-free platforms (and say that they do), because this doesn't
recommend the installation of those non-free platforms. But free
systems should not recommend, suggest, or offer
Reid Nichol wrote:
--- Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use of non-free software is highly harmful to your
computer and ethics.
Please cite a piece of software that can harm my computer merely
because it is non-free in the FSF/GNU sense. And you should probably
qualify that
Karthik Kumar wrote:
Firmware are not free enough when they have a license that does not
allow them to be redistributed with the system.
You are talking of free as in freedom and not price, right? If the
whole point was to avoid paying $$$ in OpenBSD, my bad.
The GNG foundation
Karthik Kumar wrote:
It's been a while since I removed links on that page. And
for the information I very much use OpenBSD. Maybe I should change the
title to Free as in beer OSes.
No. Free is free.
Free as in beer is unethical to children who view the website and wonder
what beer tastes
Unix Fan wrote:
L wrote:
Restoring files from FAT partitions is easy.. I use fatback(http://sf.net/projects/fatback)...
I will check that one out..
But either way, no such utility exists to restore data that has been overwritten..
regardless of the algorithms used.
Unless
L wrote:
Unix Fan wrote:
But either way, no such utility exists to restore data that has been
overwritten.. regardless of the algorithms used.
Unless there was a magnetic offline hardware utility of some sort that
scanned magnetic fields?
http://www.actionfront.com
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:31:00AM -0700, L wrote:
Hypocrite thoughts are constructed in your mind the way you want to see
it.. the same way CULTS want you to see that their cult is right about
EVERYTHING and every other religion and church is wrong.
You
Deanna Phillips wrote:
Marco Peereboom writes:
Blah blah blah my feelers are hurt. Do I need to mail you
some maxi pads?
Do I need to point out that you've attempted to insult someone
by comparing him to some bullshit stereotype about women?
Here is my stereotype: Sharp 200Watt
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
L wrote:
...
The first time I heard cult mentioned was when people were complaining
about open bsd being a cult of open bsd followers, or mean rude cult
members...
I assume you are talking about this dreadful thread.
...
Outside this thread the first time I
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
BTW, one would say that the accusations of cult did not start from me
(or Richard), so I'd say you accusers fall straight on the above all
that's included in that link:
We are not a cult -- all of those other groups are. We work very hard
to make sure that our
Amarendra Godbole wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008 1:05 PM, L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/5/08, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no such thing as free as in beer. This is one of the dumbest
analogies I have ever heard. Who came up with it anyway?
Free as in yeast
Richard Stallman wrote:
Developing a program ( real software ) for a non-free platform is big
encouragement by loud communication ( actions speak better than words
) to use or continue using that non-free platform.
There are two issues here: the practical effects, and the message
Richard Stallman wrote:
What is an operating system? An OS could be considered an application,
You could consider an OS an application, and you could consider
hardware software, just as you could consider the Earth a pumpkin. My
response is that you're starting from assumptions I find
Richard Stallman wrote:
I don't personally do most of our web site maintenance, of course.
But I take responsibility for removing this link if it should not be
there.
Can you tell the FSF web programmers to do more checking for HTML/SQL
injection vulnerabilities?
I have found a
I have nothing against getting paid to write software, as such. I
criticize non-free software, software that doesn't respect users'
essential freedoms, but that has nothing to do with whether the
programmer gets paid. Getting paid to write free software (which many
people do) is fine. Writing
Floor Terra wrote:
I have no problem problem with name calling but what do you hope to
accomplish by you request to call GNU bullshit?
Although my opinion of GNU is not as positive as it was before this
whole RMS vs OpenBSD discussion, I will not insult people just to receive
free gifts
Floor
Richard Stallman wrote:
That itself has problems. Do you mean home computer users? From what I
know, most large companies, including hardware vendors, and
governments uses computers as well, so they are too computer users,
thus copy hardware aren't impractical for every computer
Floor Terra wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008 7:42 PM, L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Floor Terra wrote:
I have no problem problem with name calling but what do you hope to
accomplish by you request to call GNU bullshit?
Although my opinion of GNU is not as positive as it was before this
whole RMS vs
Paul Greidanus wrote:
Richard Stallman wrote:
In the case of hardware, it would mean it is too expensive to
copy...
which it could be... so does that mean freedom to copy something
became irrelevant as the cost of copying becomes relatively
expensive?
When something is
Tony Abernethy wrote:
Karthik Kumar wrote:
Okay, I didn't install it.
You did install it?
You didn't install it?
You don't know whether you did or didn't?
Seems like there is a substantial disconnect from reality.
Karthik Kumar is probably using GNG.
GNG is not GNG.
What if I give a dog a computer system.. and he uses it to bark at.
The dog finds it entertaining. The dog would not understand the source
code if it was offered.
The program that the dog barks at while Mom and Pop are out shopping, is
closed source.
It does not matter that it is closed
Deanna Phillips wrote:
It obviously was poor choice of words and I am sorry for
saying it.
Thanks.
Sorry for calling you on it, but I'm annoyed enough at having
to read these hundreds of RMS-related messages in the first
place.
When will you people give up? Some of us feel obligated to
Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:09:42PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
- vendor A sells hardware that requires a firmware
- OpenBSD wants to support that hardware and needs the firmware
to be shipped, say in /etc/firmware/, to have the
Mihai Popescu B. S. wrote:
Both sides started to used stupid and out of context words. Nothing was
achieved,
just insults and no productive discussion.
Stallman continually keeps repairing and admitting to a small amount of
his errors... and this entire thread has made progress. The only
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 12:31 PM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since plants can be easily replicated, why are we buying food from farmers?
I'm not against buying software from developers (as long as it is free
software). See
Richard Stallman wrote:
I would not call your message an attack, because encouraging attacks
is not the same thing as making an attack. It is not the same, but it
goes in the same direction. I hope that the other OpenBSD developers
will repudiate such conduct. Surely we can disagree without
Richard Stallman wrote:
I hope that the other OpenBSD developers
will repudiate such conduct.
You said the other openbsd developers.
In this context, it implies that I am an OpenBSD developer. The other
means that I am one myself and relative to me, they are the other
developers with me.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:15:37PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
I wrote:
I hope that you have not arranged in effect to cause our web site
to be attacked.
You responded:
It was a recommendation of OpenBSD rather than an attack.
It was neither a recommendation of OpenBSD nor
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 8:06 PM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With free software, users don't have to pay the distribution fee in
order to use the software. They can copy the program from a friend who
has a copy, or with the help of a friend who has
My laptop's wireless network driver is Atheros (ath 4) is detected
in boot time (netstat -A).
I bought a D-Link DWL G630 card which is (obviously) not detected by
OBSD. All the other Netgear cards that are listed in [ath 4] are not
available here.
The only other card I can find is Netgear WG
dmesg?
OpenBSD 3.7 (GENERIC) #50: Sun Mar 20 00:01:57 MST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz (GenuineIntel
686-class) 3.20 GHz
cpu0:
On 8/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Z L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, August 15, 2005 8:27 am
Subject: Re: [OpenBSD 3.7] D-Link DWL G630 and Netgear WG 511T (dmesg +
ifconfig -A)
ath0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Atheros AR5212 rev 0x01
cbb0 at pci2 dev 4 function 0 ENE CB-1410 CardBus rev
0x01pci_intr_map: no mapping for pin A
: couldn't map interrupt
cardbus doesn't work in that machine.
What do you suggest I should do? Any tips, recommendation?
Hi Theo,
Straight up, I'm very sorry. It was not my intention to be rude and I'm
not a rude person. All I am is desperate to be able to use OpenBSD
again. The fact is I have been a supporter and advocate for OpenBSD for
many years and I admire you for what you've done. I just want to be able
to
Theo, I'm sorry you feel that way. When I wrote the email, i wasn't even
upset or angry. I still don't know what offended you but nothing of what
i wrote was meant to offend you or anybody else. I haven't once sworn at
you, I haven't been rude to you. I never said anything offensive (that i
was
Thank you all, for all the help/advice.
If that is what has offended people, i didn't mean the developers were
not capable of writing a usb driver. I respect them and know that what
they do requres an extremely clever mind (I can program a bit in C but
nothing like the developers so i can
Hi,
I'm trying to make an encrypted home directory which is
mounted/unmounted on login/logout.
Mounting it on login was the easy part ( with a custom login style ),
but is there any way to unmount it on logout ( short from modifying
init ) ? I want to alter the system as little as possible, so
the feeling that I'll have to go with the
logout file approach...
On 11/7/05, Richard P. Koett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uosis L wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make an encrypted home directory which is
mounted/unmounted on login/logout.
Mounting it on login was the easy part ( with a custom
this is to
encrypt the entire root partition ( or at least /etc ).
On 11/7/05, Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Uosis L
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 3:29 PM
To: Richard P. Koett
Cc: misc
That's a very good point. I guess the logout script would have to
check if there are any other processes from that user before
unmounting the filesystem. It would work the same way you suggested
with cron, except only called on logout, so it would have an immediate
effect.
On 11/7/05, Ted Unangst
I've successfully built a site to site vpn between openbsd and cisco gear,
both the 3000 series concentrators and asa 5520's.
This might help.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=117242498422792w=2
This details my setup that finally worked.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=117245629704699w=2
Hi,
We are trying to get the PHP exec() function to work in a chrooted
Apache environment (4.1-stable MP ACPI enabled, PHP 5.1.6).
Even if using a static binary (for example date) in the chrooted
directory, exec just returns 127.
Everything works fine when running chroot from the command
Hi,
PDO seems to be enabled in the php5 package.
Is there a package or packages for the PDO drivers, eg. php_pdo_mysql.so?
/Johan
that you actually want to grab the files
from. If you've downloaded files into ~/openbsd37, then add that to
the end of your command, adjust the path for -b, and you should be all
set.
Take care,
Marti
On 6/11/05, Z L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded /3.7/i386 and want to create
I been trying to install OpenBSD 3.7 and/ or 3.5 in my new laptop (new
means it was bought in September, 2004). The bootloader get stuck at
pckbc0 ISA Q Port 0x60/5 every time.
Oddly both 3.5 and 3.7 giving me the same error and getting stuck at
the same place.
I tried to boot with
On 7/8/05, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Z L wrote:
I been trying to install OpenBSD 3.7 and/ or 3.5 in my new laptop (new
means it was bought in September, 2004). The bootloader get stuck at
pckbc0 ISA Q Port 0x60/5 every time.
Oddly both 3.5 and 3.7 giving me the same error
You may be able to get a dmesg using a serial console. If your laptop
has a serial port, that is. I'm not sure how common those ports
(still) are, given the omnipresence of USB ports these days.
Should your laptop not have a serial port, you may want to try your
luck with a USB-to-serial
Try disabling 'ahc' in the UKC prompt: 'disable ahc', then 'quit'.
-p.
Tried. Doesn't work; the same problem occurs.
I installed OBSD3.7 on my laptop. Things that are not working are:
sound and modem (dial-up internal laptop modem) and apm.
For modem, sound and apm it says: Device not configured. For APM I
tried to set the apmd_flags=YES in rc.conf. For sound and modem I
tried the things that are described in
Apart from providing the *complete* dmesg output already requested by
someone else
Below is the complete dmesg output:
OpenBSD 3.7 (GENERIC) #50: Sun Mar 20 00:01:57 MST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
John R. Shannon wrote:
On Monday 09 January 2006 03:53, you wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty new to pf and OpenBSD which maybe explains why I'm still not
sure after reading the man pages and docs how to solve this;
I'm trying to figure out how do use rdr in combination with outgoing nat.
External
Joakim Roubert wrote:
Hi!
I would like to find a LSI SATA RAID card which is as simple (and thus
cheap) as possible. Perhaps you guys could help me with these questions:
* I cannot find MegaRAID 150-2 in ami(4). Am I right supposing this one
is not supported?
* Which of the supported LSI SATA
Hi!
We are trying to install OpenBSD 3.8 on a Fujitsu-Siemens PRIMERGY RX100
S2 server.
The install CD boots fine, but we get warnings about the Intel 6300ESB:
vendor Intel, unknown product 0x257e (class system subclass
miscellaneous, rev 0x02) at pci0 dev 6 function 0 not configured
Intel
1 - 100 of 836 matches
Mail list logo
