On 02/10/15(Fri) 12:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> [...]
> I think it would probably make sense to remove an autoconfigured
> prefix/address if an interface goes down (and one could argue for this
> being the right thing to do for IPv4/DHCP as well - I lost count of
> the number of times I have to
On 01/10/15(Thu) 19:00, Daniel Gillen wrote:
> [...]
> I managed to reproduce the issue and executed the commands you told me.
>
> # ifconfig pppoe0
> IPv4 address is 80.XX.XX.227
> Autoconfigured IPv6 address is 2001:XX:XX:707:XX:XX:XX:6c3a
>
> # ping6 -c 1 -S 2001:XX:XX:707:XX:XX:XX:6c3a
f3::/64 prefix addresses which caused quite some issues as
> my NAT was still using that address for part of the connections.
>
> Shouldn't those be removed as soon as their prefix is no longer valid?
> Or at least all be deprecated?
If this happens again could you include the output of "# ndp -p",
"# route -n show -inet6" and "# ndp -r" in your report?
Thanks,
Martin
On Sep 20, 2015 3:12 PM, "Quartz" wrote:
>
> I have a machine where tapping the front panel power button correctly
halts and powers off the machine however there's a solid 10 second
delay after I press the button before anything happens. Is there any way to
speed this
The DEC VT220 terminal did not support color. That's why color works when
you echo control codes and not through vim. Vim reads $TERM and decides
not to use color.
Set $TERM up to something that supports color if you want color.
-- Martin
On 30/11/15(Mon) 18:28, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I repeatedly hit the kernel panic below. Easy to reproduce as it happens over
> and over again within 60 minutes after rebooting. Root cause is not known.
>
> I'm running snapshot on an USB stick. I tried different USB ports with the
>
athn0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR9281" rev 0x01: apic 5 int 12
athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM rev 22
Works fine with hostap in an old eee 1000HA, although also not exactly high
volume traffic...
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03,
On 06/12/15(Sun) 20:44, Callum Davies wrote:
> Doesn't work, but at least it makes the dmesg look better.
What doesn't work?
>
> Index: sys/dev/pci/pcidevs
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
> retrieving revision
On 05/01/16(Tue) 13:19, Matt Adams wrote:
> On 05/01/16 05:10 AM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >On 03/01/16(Sun) 23:18, Matt Adams wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I noted that uvideo has support for the Logitech QuickCam Pro 5000 - a piece
> >>of hardware
On 03/01/16(Sun) 23:18, Matt Adams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noted that uvideo has support for the Logitech QuickCam Pro 5000 - a piece
> of hardware that I have. However, ugen appears to attach to this device
> instead of allowing the special firmware (installed via "# fw_install
> uvideo") to
On 05/01/16(Tue) 12:29, Håkon Lerring wrote:
> Hello misc.
>
> I was investigating a problem with a firewall that goes AWOL every week. It
> happens only if i activate an ipv6 address on a carp interface. The carp log
> has this message:
>
> Jan 5 12:10:06 /bsd: carp: packet size 48 too small
On 19/11/15(Thu) 17:54, Sonic wrote:
> Have serious problems for over 7 weeks now with em driver,
> specifically any rev of if_em.c > 1.305. Starting with rev 1.306,
> released on 2015/09/30 and continuing to -current, watchdog timeouts
> rue the day. Unfortunately rev 1.305 no longer builds with
On 20/11/15(Fri) 17:32, edward wandasiewicz wrote:
> If I try to plug in various USB 3.0 umass(4) devices into a USB 3.0 or
> USB 3.1 Type C port, nothing gets registered via dmesg, even if I add
This issue seems to be occurring only after a warm reboot as found by
jcs@.
Could you tell me if
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Daniel Melameth <dan...@melameth.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Martin Hlavatý <mar...@hlavaty.eu> wrote:
>> I have issues with firewall lags while there is peak in match
>> rule counter in pf. Normally it has match
t root
scsibus2 at softraid0: 256 targets
root on wd0a (6493b8f65ac66d12.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
carp: carp1 demoted group carp by 1 to 129 (carpdev)
carp: carp99 demoted group carp by 1 to 130 (carpdev)
carp: pfsync0 demoted group carp by 32 to 162 (pfsync init)
carp: pfsync0 demoted group pfsync by 32 to 32 (pfsync init)
carp: pfsync0 demoted group carp by 1 to 163 (pfsync bulk start)
carp: pfsync0 demoted group pfsync by 1 to 33 (pfsync bulk start)
Regards,
Martin Hlavaty
On 22/11/15(Sun) 01:11, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
> On 22/11/2015 00:34, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 04:22:51PM +0100, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Sorry for what may appear to be a strange question, but shouldn't there
> >>be a check against
On 22/11/15(Sun) 18:30, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
> On 22/11/2015 17:48, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >On 22/11/15(Sun) 16:56, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
> >>On 22/11/2015 15:52, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >>>
> >>>When you say "the bridge changed somewhat
On 22/11/15(Sun) 16:56, Momtchil Momtchev wrote:
> On 22/11/2015 15:52, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >
> >btw., what OpenBSD version is this diff for? This is not -current.
> >> Thanks for the quick reply. That was my impression too, but it seems
> >>that bri
icast or not if they are addressed to the OpenBSD machine
or not, if they are reply to other packets: we know nothing.
Plus we don't know the output of your ifconfig nor which code you're
running. Come on, if you want some help, let others help you ;)
Cheers,
Martin
On 07/06/16(Tue) 12:36, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 12:50:04PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 06/06/16(Mon) 16:23, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:50:49AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > On 06/06/16(Mon
On 06/06/16(Mon) 13:04, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> Broadcast frame, coming into a bridge'ed interface, passes if_input() 3 times,
> and actually input (ether_input()) twice.
>
> - A frame enters an interface (e.g. pair(4)), the interface calls if_input()
> on it. The frame is queued in
On 06/06/16(Mon) 16:23, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:50:49AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 06/06/16(Mon) 13:04, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > > Broadcast frame, coming into a bridge'ed interface, passes if_input() 3
> > > times,
> >
On 08/06/16(Wed) 14:52, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> This is suboptimal with respect to performance, but "correctly work-around"
> the problem, that is, bpf against an bridge'ed interface receives duplicate
> frames. (It happens for not only broadcast but also unicast.)
No way.
>
> diff --git
On Fri, May 27 2016, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:09:21PM +0000, Martin Oppegaard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can't get suspend or hibernate to work with this computer. It has
>> encrypted root hdd and apmd is running (-A). When I suspend the
. In this state if I press the restart button the CPU fan calms
down and less power is drawn from the UPS, but I have to hold the power
button to shut it down.
With hibernate, it restarts immediately.
Any tips?
Regards,
Martin Oppegaard
OpenBSD 5.9 (GENERIC.MP) #4: Thu May 19 08:22:39 CEST 2016
On 06/01/16(Wed) 10:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 05/01/16(Tue) 13:19, Matt Adams wrote:
> > On 05/01/16 05:10 AM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > >On 03/01/16(Sun) 23:18, Matt Adams wrote:
> > >>Hi,
> > >>
> > >>I noted that uvideo has suppo
I have same errors in log and same behavior on one of my firewall
cluster. Carp flapping is a result of master system lagging and not
sending carp packets on time. You can workaround it by setting advbase
to some larger value, e.g. 10, but it will obviously still keep
lagging and dropping packets
On 16/01/16(Sat) 18:40, Doug Moss wrote:
> (my apologies for last message - unfamiliar with Yahoo and forcing plain text
> email)
>
> Why is a manually entered permanent arp entry being overwritten?
It should not, are you running -current? If not could you try?
>
> At my home, I have an ISP
oose the
> keymap is missing.
>
> It is possible to set the keymap after login using kbd de or wsconsctl
> keyboard.encoding=de but the setting is gone after a reboot.
>
> Thanks for ideas.
You can simply do
# echo de > /etc/kbdtype
This is documented in kbd(8) feel free to check it ;)
Martin
On 24/02/16(Wed) 18:56, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On OpenBSD 5.7, I'm using alternative route table to send ping a on specific
> route.
>
> On a fresh install, I simply do
>
> > route -T 1 add default 192.168.1.1
> > ping -V 1 8.8.8.8
>
> It works well on 5.7, but I can't managed
On 25/02/16(Thu) 00:05, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/02/16(Wed) 21:57, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> > > Le 24 févr. 2016 à 19:58, Martin Pieuchot <m...@openbsd.org> a écrit :
> > >
> > > On 24/02/16(Wed) 18:56, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> > >>
On 24/02/16(Wed) 21:57, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> > Le 24 févr. 2016 à 19:58, Martin Pieuchot <m...@openbsd.org> a écrit :
> >
> > On 24/02/16(Wed) 18:56, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On OpenBSD 5.7, I'm using alternative
On 25/01/16(Mon) 15:24, Bryan C. Everly wrote:
> [...]
> Please let me know and I'll do what I can do help.
The best advice I can give you is do something that you care about so
that you don't need anybody else to tell you what to do. If you want
to maintain an architecture you need to run it
On 20/01/16(Wed) 00:11, Doug Moss wrote:
> [...]
> Second - per other reply. I upgraded from OpenBSD 5.7 amd64 to OpenBSD 5.8
> amd64 yesterday
If you're referring to my reply, I was interested in the behavior in a
-current kernel, what will be 5.9 soon. A lot of changes happened
since 5.8.
It
On 18/01/16(Mon) 18:39, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> For about the last week, I've been seeing this oddity with the amd64
> installer when doing snap to snap upgrades on my laptop.
>
> My routine for quite a while has been to fetch snapshots off the local
> mirror whenever I notice there's a new
2016-03-11 22:42 GMT+01:00 Alan McKay <alan.mc...@gmail.com>:
> Ideally I'd like to get a redundant pair of FWs in 1U.
> But I need 4 NICs on each as a bare min.
Lanner FW-7525
Best
Martin
2016-03-15 14:31 GMT+01:00 Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.syk...@gmail.com>:
> is it only I who cannot connect to either
> of openbsd.org and openssh.com, or
Nope.
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/openbsd.org
Best
Martin
Hello Mart,
On 13/04/16(Wed) 09:22, Mart Tõnso wrote:
> Ah, yes, sorry about that. Here's the full routing info with ifconfig output:
>
> # ifconfig
> [...]
> ppp0: flags=8051 mtu 1500
> priority: 0
> groups: ppp egress
> inet
On 13/04/16(Wed) 13:27, Mart Tõnso wrote:
> Thank you! Assigning a proper ppp netmask solved this issue. I'll see
> if I can get arround to testing the patch. Is there a chance of
> including it in the "current"?
I'm waiting for you report, if it is positive I'll ask for reviews. If
the review
On 12/04/16(Tue) 16:20, Mart Tõnso wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am hitting a strange behaviour with openbsd 5.9.
>
> # uname -a
> OpenBSD router_dev01.lan 5.9 GENERIC.MP#1888 amd64
>
> There's pppd running on the box (for a 3g connection) and OpenVPN
> connection on top of that.
>
> The bug is that
On 20/03/16(Sun) 03:59, DarkSoul wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I was testing out a beta IPv6 service over PPPoE that our ISP is
> developping,
> and playing around with kernel PPPoE.
>
> My configuration is as follows :
> - pppoe0 for IPv4 internet
> - gif0 for IPv6 internet (Hurricane Electric
keep focus ;)
Thank your very much for your support!
Cheers,
Martin
[0] http://www.hariguchi.org/art/art.pdf
On 25/04/16(Mon) 11:35, Kim Zeitler wrote:
> Hello Martin
>
>
> On 04/25/16 11:12, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >On 25/04/16(Mon) 10:47, Kim Zeitler wrote:
>
> >>He is running a carp interface on top of a vlan interface. In this scenario
> >>the carp i
On 25/04/16(Mon) 10:47, Kim Zeitler wrote:
> Hello Martin, hello Sebastian
>
> On 04/25/16 10:15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >On 25/04/16(Mon) 09:48, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> >>I'm trying to upgrade a HA carped firewall cluster to 5.9 but run into
> >>is
On 25/04/16(Mon) 09:48, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade a HA carped firewall cluster to 5.9 but run into
> issues.
Which issues? After reading your whole email I still don't understand
your problem(s). What does not work?
When reporting a network issue, please include the
On 26/04/16(Tue) 09:07, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> root@srv80:~# ifconfig carp7
> carp7: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> lladdr 00:00:5e:00:01:01
> description: IT
> priority: 15
> carp: BACKUP carpdev vlan7 vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew
On 17/05/16(Tue) 16:37, Andy Lemin wrote:
> Hi Misc,
>
> Since 5.9 (maybe earlier), we noticed that our CARP interfaces no longer
> behave as before, don't initialise properly on boot up, and throw errors at
> boot.
>
> I know there has been lots of changes, especially IPv6. So hopefully this
>
On 05/05/16(Thu) 19:03, Pavan Maddamsetti wrote:
> I have been reading about ongoing improvements to SMP in OpenBSD. My
> understanding is that context switching from userspace to the kernel can be
> hazardous if shared resources are not protected by locking.
The context switching it not the
2016-05-09 18:57 GMT+02:00 :
> - I don't know in modern browsers, but Links 2.12 say that the
> certificate is not valid. It's just old browsers, or firefox also
> have this same problem?
All's good. See
2016-08-12 23:28 GMT+02:00 Philip Guenther <guent...@gmail.com>:
> Yes, the previous situation with and
> was confusing (code was including the wrong header and not getting the
Thanks. Finally an answer after days of shouting.
Best
Martin
On 06/07/16(Wed) 06:53, Aaron Riekenberg wrote:
> Hi Martin -
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> It installed ok on my 5.9 stable system. patch failed to process it - I
> think because line numbers have changed. But it was not too difficult to
> install it manually.
Thanks,
On 16/07/16(Sat) 13:08, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> Hola,
>
> I got a pair of mini-pc's to play with for the summer vacation, small
> fanless
> thingies with 4xGE and wifi.
>
> http://www.qotom.net/goods-129-QOTOM-Q190G4+4+LAN+Mini+PC.html
>
> When testing with the latest snapshot USB wont play.
>
Hello Aaron,
On 24/06/16(Fri) 06:25, Aaron Riekenberg wrote:
> I am running an OpenBSD 5.9 box as a firewall/router on a Comcast cable
> connection. My box has 2 interfaces: em0 on external network (cable modem)
> and em1 on internal network. I have applied all available patches for 5.9.
>
>
your ntp servers.
Best
Martin
2017-01-23 15:37 GMT+01:00 andrew fabbro <and...@fabbro.org>:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Martin Schröder <mar...@oneiros.de>
wrote:
>> 2017-01-20 8:43 GMT+01:00 minek van <minek...@mail.com>:
>> > Or something would be broken with random UIDs/GUIDs,
On 25/01/17(Wed) 10:36, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:10:34PM -0500, mabi wrote:
> > Hi Stefan
> > Thanks for your input. It looks like the g2k16 modifications to the athn
> > code from awolk@ did not make it into the 6.0 release. So there is still
> > hope for 6.1 ;-)
>
>
On 09/02/17(Thu) 17:55, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Am 02/08/17 um 17:57 schrieb Hrvoje Popovski:
> > On 8.2.2017. 17:51, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
> >> Updated a machine to latest (5 Feb.) snapshot of amd64. I'm now seeing
> >> the following message after booting that I've not recalled seeing before:
>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:19:31PM +0100, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> I've found an issue with xargs.
>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:44:11AM -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:19:31 +0100, Andreas Kusalananda
> =?iso-8859-1?B?S+Ro5HJp
> ?= wrote:
>
> > However, when I use nul-termination instead:
> >
> > $ printf 'hello\00world\00' | xargs -0 -I arg printf '>%s<\n' "arg"
> >
2017-01-20 8:43 GMT+01:00 minek van :
> Could it bring more security if the UIDs/GUIDs would be random?
Why? What's the attack you want to defend against?
> Or something would be broken with random UIDs/GUIDs, ex.: NFS? Would it only
> do pain?
Yes.
ing to this panic have been fixed post 6.0. I'd
suggest you to upgrade to -current where it should work as expected. If
not, please send a new bug report to bugs@.
Thanks,
Martin
Hi,
Since I upgraded to OBSD 6.0 I have had some problems with Unbound and
dnscrypt-proxy.
Normally I would troubleshoot by using "dig" to request directly to
dnscrypt-proxy, but for some reason (I don't know) the "-p" option has been
removed and it is impossible to use that now.
Unbound
09.09.2016, 06:14, "Lists" :
> Does unbound.conf have the following setting?
>
> do-not-query-localhost: no
Yes, it has the setting.
On 11/09/16(Sun) 18:04, K K wrote:
> [...]
> > There is a lot of ongoing work in this area, OpenBSD doesn't claim to
> > be the performance leader today.
>
> What is the take of OpenBSD developers on this?
> Are they any plans?
>
> Many options seems available, but I have no idea how they could
hat the responses
came from the right IP.
(I would check both directions: clients -> unbound and
unbound -> nameservers.)
Martin
On 21/09/16(Wed) 10:44, mxb wrote:
> Panic is very similar to
So far no developer have a clue how to reproduce this panic. It's a
long standing bug that is now being exposed. Without knowing what
triggers it we are stuck.
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/tech@openbsd.org/msg32608.html
>
ct W^X violation
If so, see
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade60.html
specifically about the wxallowed mount option.
Martin
ing forward to getting the boards you are sending them.
Best
Martin
e Disable Bit: Yes.'' That is
the NX bit. (Intel calls it the XD bit.)
This has been around a while. Anything you come across that isn't
ancient will include it.
Martin
2016-08-24 16:48 GMT+02:00 :
> You did not provide any sensible detail, so consider this guess work.
You're not helping.
2016-08-24 21:50 GMT+02:00 <li...@wrant.com>:
> Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:37:22 +0200 Martin Schröder <mar...@oneiros.de>
>> You're not helping.
>>
> Neither are you, of course, needless to say. Because you just won't get
Did you actually read his first mail? Do again a
OpenBSD
PFLOG, capture length 160)
Would you rather have something convert packets to ASCII arbitrarily
throwing away `unimportant' fields?
Martin
antity for an HAProxy
> server.
None of this is the domain of OpenBSD and nobody in his right mind
wants to run Stackexchange on OpenBSD.
Or are you suggesting that SAP should port HANA to OpenBSD?
Best
Martin
gt; fine.
We have man pages and wikipedia exists. :-)
Best
Martin
2016-10-19 14:24 GMT+02:00 Marko Cupać <marko.cu...@mimar.rs>:
> Any other words of wisdom regarding my idea?
Safe yourself the trouble and get a similar machine with more NICs,
e.g. from Lanner.
Best
Martin
On 20/11/16(Sun) 13:58, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
> A few week back there was an outage at my ISP. Afterwards, I kept
> getting crashed on igmpproxy after changing channels on the tv a few
> times:
This has been fixed in -current.
On 20/11/16(Sun) 18:34, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 20/11/16(Sun) 13:58, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
> > > A few week back there was an outage at my ISP. Afterwards, I kept
> > > getting crashed on igmppr
On 25/10/16(Tue) 03:27, Doug Moss wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 1:37 PM, Martin Pieuchot <m...@openbsd.org>
> wrote:
> >If you're referring to my reply, I was interested in the behavior in a
> >-current kernel, what will be 5.9 soon. A lot of chang
2016-12-14 14:09 GMT+01:00 Rubén Llorente <port...@use.startmail.com>:
> I used to think that OpenJDK already included the Unlimited Strength
Policies,
> so this is a bit confusing.
http://stackoverflow.com/q/1179672/821436 :-)
Best
Martin
On 11/12/16(Sun) 00:50, Joe Holden wrote:
> On 10/12/2016 08:43, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> > > > seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one specific interface:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This looks like some stupid TV game, where contesters are given some
> > clues from time to time and they have
On 05/12/16(Mon) 14:05, Marc Peters wrote:
> Am 12/02/16 um 13:39 schrieb Leo Unglaub:
> > I just found out that since i changed my mygate up to your suggestion
> > that i now have to ping6 fe80::1%em0 first and then i am able to
> > connecto to other hosts via IPv6. But not before i pinged the
>
On 06/12/16(Tue) 13:48, Rafał Błaszczyk wrote:
> At first I would like to say hello and greet everyone as this is my first
> post here.
>
> I am having strange issues with one of the CARP interfaces.
>
> I have two OpenBSD boxes (fw1, fw2) running as HA firewalls with CARP
> interfaces in each
> I recently changed my FDE passphrase and now my laptop won't boot.
> Bootloader just gives me "invalid passphrase" when I try to unlock it on boot.
> Its a bit odd as I can boot usb stick and manually open the drive and upgrade
> the openbsd installation on it. It just won't work on the boot.
-free firmware blobs".
What have I misunderstood?
Kind regards,
Martin
ludovic coues said:
> You are free to use OpenBSD code.
> You are free to copy OpenBSD code.
> You are free to modify OpenBSD code.
> You are free to distribute you fork.
>
> So unless your dictionary is twisted, shipping non-free firmware isn't
> an exception to these freedom.
You're wrong.
08.01.2017, 01:29, "Mike Burns" <mike+open...@mike-burns.com>:
> On 2017-01-08 00.02.21 +0100, Martin Hanson wrote:
>> The issue is a misguiding policy statement.
>
> It could be a language issue. I'm a native speaker and everything Theo,
> et al., are saying
08.01.2017, 02:53, "Peter Rippe" :
> I think it absolutely is a language issue:
>
>> On policy page it clearly says: "OpenBSD strives to provide code that can
>
> be freely used, copied, modified, and distributed by anyone and for any
> purpose."
>
> Operative word being
On Sun, 8 Jan 2017, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> The above policy applies to the base system code.
>> It does not apply to ports and packages of third party software, i.e.
>> anything
>> listed by pkg_info.
> Perhaps the whole only a misunderstanding of the original poster that
> could have been
ot, what's the difference between running closed source
>> firmware and closed source drivers?
>>
>> During a Debian installation, or even a Linux Mint installation, the user
>> gets the choice whether he wants to install these "non-free firmware blobs".
>>
>> What have I misunderstood?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Martin
2017-04-05 22:55 GMT+02:00 Flipchan <flipc...@riseup.net>:
> Ping Theo, couldnt someone create a needs improvments list n put it on like
> OpenBSD.org?
No. You've got an itch to scratch, fix that.
Best
Martin
On 03/04/17(Mon) 10:41, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'm reading some networking stuff and I saw Van Jacobson presentation
> about net channels concept.
> For me, as user that doesn't know net internals, this presentation seems
> quite reasonable.
>
> Beside that it's about linux network
2017-04-19 21:00 GMT+02:00 :
> I'd like to help write them! What's your process/format for doing so?
>
> - Sent from Outlook for Android
Hint: It uses OpenBSD
On 07/03/17(Tue) 19:38, Joe Holden wrote:
> On 12/12/2016 16:55, Joe Holden wrote:
> > On 12/12/2016 10:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 11/12/16(Sun) 00:50, Joe Holden wrote:
> > > > On 10/12/2016 08:43, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> > > > > > &g
Hi
I have successfully setup unbound on OpenBSD 6.1 and I can query it.
In the same setup I have tested dnsmasq, but it almost seems broken on OpenBSD
6.1.
I have disabled unbound and confirmed nothing is running on port 53 using
netstat.
Then I have installed dnsmasq from packages and set
On 28/04/17(Fri) 14:03, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi] wrote:
> > If you can answer this question you've already done 50% of the work.
>
> Exactly. Which is why I'm asking -- not expecting anyone to give a full
> answer. I want to know what people who have been working on this issue
> have already found
On 28/04/17(Fri) 12:18, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi] wrote:
> [...]
> Now, can anyone provide a relatively clear description of what it is
> that make the same browsers (Firefox, Seamonkey, Chrome) that work
> fine in Linux, Windows and OS X so ridiculously slow when they are
> being run on OpenBSD?
If
On 28/04/17(Fri) 16:20, Anders Andersson wrote:
> [...]
> From what I read, it seems as if the problems are mostly from when you
> try websites which are heavy on javascript.
If javascript was the problem others OSes would suffer as well.
> Let me
I have occasionally used virtualization (Qemu) for easy testing of some OS. I
have also played around with "containers" using FreeBSD Jails and Linux LXC,
but I have never ever thought of any of this as a security measurement or
anything needed beyond testing.
When I want isolation I run a
On 08/06/17(Thu) 20:38, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> On Thu 08/06/2017 16:55, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 07/06/17(Wed) 09:43, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > > On Sat 03/06/2017 08:44, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Reverting back to the previ
On 11/06/17(Sun) 15:51, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> pf.conf on my gateway (6.1) says
>
> bash-4.4# pfctl -sr | egrep -i icmp\|block
> block return log all
> :
> :
> pass quick inet proto icmp all keep state (if-bound)
> pass quick inet6 proto ipv6-icmp all keep state (if-bound)
>
>
1201 - 1300 of 1512 matches
Mail list logo