Security is not having to say how high? when someone says jump!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Miroslav Kubik
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:54 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't OpenBSD X11 come out with -nolisten tcp as
Security is everything you've ever said, plus a
process.
No. security does not require the process.
Attempted security (that doesn't quite work) requires a process.
Like the difference between does work and should work.
Making is a process.
Toast is not a process.
- --- Original Message --- -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:30:10
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Security is everything you've ever said, plus a
process.
If it is secure, it doesn't need a
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These cards don't seem to be ath anymore.
The relevant bits from my dmesg.
rl0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 D-Link Systems
530TX+ rev 0x10: irq 11 address 00:11:95:24:6a:0d
rlphy0 at rl0 phy 0: RTL internal phy
rl1 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 D-Link Systems
530TX+ rev 0x10: irq
The editing is perfectlty safe.
It is the reading of a file that is being changed that is unsafe.
Of course there's Microsoft Windows.
- --- Original Message --- -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:39:47
OM I know this behaviour form every
The first thing to do is to copy the drive with the photos
to fresh disk space before further damage is done to the originals.
Expect recovery to be long and painful even with some tools
to make it easier.
There are people here that know a lot more about this than I, but the
first thing is to get
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15 seconds or less.
The stunt is essentially the same as stuff in newspapers.
The reporter writes. The editor puts as much as will fit in the alloted
space and ignores the remainder without even looking. The
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15
seconds or less.
Nonsense. Just because your MS Outlook does not
support or is not
configured
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:07:47
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11 +0100
Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15
seconds or less.
Quoth Gustavo Rios Saturday, November 05, 2005 8:40 PM
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=424451seqNum=1
UNIX was a terrific workhorse for its time, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:40:12AM -0200, Gustavo
Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone
tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=4244
51seqNum=1
Looks like a rehash of
Further, since the switch is manageable, it has some ability to report port
status.
Odds-on that there is a disagreement on FULL/HALF-DUPLEX between the switch
and the network card.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stuart Henderson
Sent:
Can you put the files on two different disk drives?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Mikhail Malamud
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 9:39 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: fdisk and disklabel C/H/S
--- Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Some I've been in, the owner never gets a chance. You're already out of
there. Forcibly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Markus Kolb
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 5:06 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Problems with CPU/ARCH specific
Results can be a bit, ... interesting if there is a Linux swap partition in
existence.
(That's partition as in DOS/Windows/Linux, not partition as in BSD)
The swap is activated by default and the verification errors can be
interesting.
badblocks probably gives better assurance that the disk is in
No, they hate it when you do things that are advised against and that tend
to
run into trouble and you expect them to bail you out when you don't even
supply any hard information about the failures.
I've been following this thread, actually a bit amazed at the reticence of
the
developers. About
Some people on this list seem to have some anger management issues.
Some people not on this list seem to have some anger management issues.
Both statements true and both statements approximately equally relevant.
Overall, this list seems quite a friendly place, and if anything
is surprising, it
OpenBSD has an annoying habit of being right.
Perhaps if OpenBSD can be civilized into not speaking their minds,
OpenBSD won't be so annoying (by not being so right).
That seems to be the implicit thrust of these thingees.
Flames invited if I've misread the situation.
-Original Message-
The gcc thread. The advice is to NOT use strange optimizations.
The experience supports that advice. This is similar to people
not following a recipe and complaining that the recipe doesn't work.
This thread is started by someone with a degree in teaching
computer science, who is afraid to
Dunno if relevant, but a long time ago, routing ethernet
over an internal SLIP connection (don't ask, fiber is much better),
connections were real flaky until I upped the MTU on the
SLIP connection to 1500. Seems Microsoft likes to put a
Don't Fragment into the TCP/IP setup and silently ignores
Correctness is difficult.
Actually, security is the easier part.
(and it's easier to keep score;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
chefren
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 6:17 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Theo gave an interview to Forbes
User A is on the east coast.
User B is on the west coast.
They both use the same computer.
What time is it?
UTC is the correct time.
User wants to view time in his own time zone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
C. L. Martinez
Sent:
Check /etc/man.conf
from fresh 3.7 install (with bash and a few others installed)
?? Did you install the man pages ??
bash-3.00$ cat /etc/man.conf
# $OpenBSD: man.conf,v 1.8 2001/04/05 19:05:49 millert Exp $
# Sheer, raging paranoia...
_versionBSD.2
# The whatis/apropos database.
Dunno if it will help but
Writing to a fresh floppy (W98)
foo.txt
bar.foobar
dir dir.txt
The (possibly) long filename take up an extra directory slot
and is in the proper case.
Floppy should be FAT12 (very limited number of clusters)
but this has nothing to do with long file names.
The extension
man crontab (from fresh OBSD 3.7)
FILES
/var/cron/cron.allow list of users allowed to use crontab
/var/cron/cron.deny list of users prohibited from using crontab
/var/cron/tabsdirectory of individual crontabs
I think there's a reason that they include the man
5% or so is reserved for root and is not available.
When everybody has run out of disk space, it is very helpful
if the situation does NOT apply to root.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Matthew S Elmore
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:35
Filesystem 512-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 256252180540 6290074%/
256252 blocks less 5% reserve.
This gives 243440 blocks total available for users.
less 180540 gives 62900 blocks currently available for users.
180540/243440 gives
The following seems to work.
$ year=2005
$ foo=$(expr $year - 1900 )
$ dayscount=$(expr $foo \* 365 )
$ echo $dayscount
38325
Problems include an unescaped asterisk
man expr indicates that parentheses should work
but my playing with them seems to indicate otherwise.
---Correction:
$
Just guessing, but it looks like you are at the very fringe of what BIOS
can and cannot access. Insignificant differences have large consequences,
just like a few inches near the edge of a cliff. If so, any recompile of
the kernel would be unbootable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
The Linksys WRT54g has a 4-port switch, an RJ45 jack labeled Internet,
and an access point which can speak 11Mbps and/or 54Mbps.
What I do on our local lan is essentially to use it/them as a bridge.
Turn off the Linksys DHCPD, set the internal IP address, set a password,
set whatever parameters
From a Toshiba Satellite, maybe not too dissimilar:
I assume the Q of pckbc0 ISA Q Port 0x60/5 is a typo
Seems to be a pckbc0 and a pckbd0
Beyond that I'm out of my depth. (way out;)
Loading...
probing: pc0 mem[639K 478M a20=on]
disk: fd0 hd0+
OpenBSD/i386 BOOT 2.06
boot
booting hd0a:/bsd:
This *may* help.
man mount
softdep
(FFS only.) Mount the file system using soft dependen-
cies. Instead of metadata being written immediately,
it
is written in an ordered fashion to keep the on-disk
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
[snip]
We chose to use 0 for outside 1 for internal and 2 for server. I cannot
fool anybody into thinking that 2 looks like S, dammit!
From the land down under: Australia.
Do we look umop apisdn from up over?
[snicker] try a mirror.
But seriously folks, that looks like THE
Unless I am very much mistaken, this is Unix not Multics.
To do anything with the rings, you must make userland
into a three-ring circus.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dave Feustel
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:05 PM
To: Theo de Raadt
Rings and segments are pretty much orthogonal concepts.
C is hardly unique in not supporting segmentation.
The only languages I am aware of that even come close are Burroughs
Algol and PL/I (and as always Basic Assembly). (Lisp?)
But overriding is the fact that x86 supporting segments does not
Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
Nick Holland wrote:
PERSONALLY, I prefer to call the single processor kernel bsd.sp,
bsd.sp is not correct if you crazy about correct terminology :)
bsd.up (uniprocessor) is correct one.
Alexey.
Maybe it's just me, but everytime I see up I see down as its implicit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 15 Nov 2005 08:20:07
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:23:00AM +0100, the unit
calling itself Henning Brauer wrote:
'adjusting local clock by XXs'
The word 'by' is a preposition with a specific
meaning in the context of
its use... it means in the amount of... but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Damien Miller wrote:
...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] djm]$ netstat -sp ip | grep -E
'(bad.*checksum|total packets)'
61092730 total packets received
0 bad header checksums
wouldn't netstat -sp tcp | grep -E
'(bad.*checksum|total packets)' give
the output
Ted Unangst:
[i was trying to stay away, but can't.]
I've never really trusted prepositions ;)
By and by, stand by that clock and adjust it by 30 minutes,
by whatever means and by whatever rubric you deem appropriate.
By which direction, I wonder.
On 11/18/05, J Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J.C. Roberts wrote:
I went looking for HIER(7) but didn't know it's name, so I stuffed the
words file system into an Apropos keyword search and got nothing.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=file+systemsektion=0
manpath=OpenBSD+Currentarch=i386apropos=1format=html
Damn, I
J.C. Roberts wrote:
To the rest of list users; Please pardon another long email from me on
this. Helping reasonable people like Robbert understand why many people
consider HOWTO's to be harmful is hopefully worth the added noise and
bandwidth.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:57:12 +0100, Robbert
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
In all these:
I'm going to take this thread for what I think it is... the old guard
telling us youngin's that our efforts are appreciated, but we've got a
bit more to learn about how things work, and how to write good
documentation, before we're really ready to jump
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
all or nothing.
make the pages match the quality of the code and
the cd's.
even if you don't care, other people do.
I PAID for my CDs. I am happy with artwork, particularly the
smirk on that puffer fish.
I did not pay for the website. If I can stumble into the FAQ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto
Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
doesn't mean it's right, does it?
Certainlly doesn't mean it's wrong.
Almost certainly means it's OpenBSD
What system were you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:53:45AM -0800, the unit
calling itself J.C. Roberts wrote:
I would assume that J.C. Roberts is a human, not a unit,
whatever that is supposed to imply.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:27:56 -0600, J Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did think - I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using a mozilla 1.7 browser, with CSS on,
JavaScript off.
And it doesn't run javascript.
Outside my area of expertise, but that seems normal somehow.
The menus on the referenced cerealport.com web-site
don't expand at
http://cerealport.com does not answer
Jacob Meuser wrote:
this is how the world works: ignore the whiners, they offer nothing
useful.
Some irresistable straight lines?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robbert Haarman writes:
Greg,
Again, you raise some interesting issues. I
wonder how likely the
catastrophic failures you describe are, versus
how likely it is that
things fail in a way where ccd actually helps
you. I was hoping someone
else would comment on
Sophie Laurie wrote:
theo,
Coming from Canada, have you ever skated on thin ice? Well, you're doing
it now!
I've lived in Canada. Nine months of winter and three months of bad skating
is just a myth.
She's a wheelchair bound 65 year old woman who only wanted your help and
Same age, but
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 22:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering the goals of OpenBSD, I would not expect USB rodents,
sound cards or even video to be necessarily well supported.
The reality is that USB gear is
Uwe Dippel wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
So don't use it.
But please, I beg of you, stop your incessant complaining.
The more you whine, the less we feel the need to change anything.
Oh, my wrong. I simply thought you were with the intention to improve
the system.
They are.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear
I installed the package autoconf but still day time client is not working
following error occur
plz help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ gcc -o byteorder byteorder.c
byteorder.c:1:17: unp.h: No such file or directory
byteorder.c: In function `main':
byteorder.c:10:
Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
Hi,
I got a quick question because I fucked up and think quite a bunch of
other people I have read about here did as well.
I read in a couple of postings that people like to mount their root
partition as read-only, I followed that since it prevents accidents in
On Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:12 AM, Peter Bako wrote:
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Remove all password restrictions?
I have an internal OpenBSD 3.8 system that I use as a data dump, internal
source for PXE installs and the like. It is not accessible to the outside
world, so security is
On Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:16 PM the whatever calling itself
J Moore wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:42:08PM +0800, the unit calling itself
Lars Hansson wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:30:34 -0600
Get a bigger H/D... 40 GB is about the smallest you can buy
today; 4 GB
drives
Bob Beck wrote:
* Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-23 15:58]:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:08:00PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
Securia gives OpenBSD a pretty nice security rating at
http://secunia.com/product/100/
Those statistics say nothing at first glance. For example, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
All good points. That, however, still leaves my
point standing that by
evading PHP, you evade the worst crap.
True, but that is the same as that by evading ENGLISH as a
lnaguage in posts, you evade the worst crap.
If these discussions were carried out in
Lukasz Sztachanski wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 01:42:13AM +1100, Shane J Pearson wrote:
~~~
OpenBSD
by hahiss
How is it that OpenBSD is able to be so secure by design with so few
resources and yet all of Microsoft's resources cannot stem the tide of
security problems that
Quoth Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it
has good support
for threads.
Remember we opted for C++ during c2k2 (or was it
man sudo for starters.
(actually that's quite enough even for a noob like me)
(even a very out of date linux is enough)
sheesh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dave Feustel
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 9:50 AM
To: Otto Moerbeek
Cc:
You sudo something, it asks for your password
You do it again soon after, it doesn't ask.
So somehow it remembers you.
Definitely more trouble, and probably opens some holes
for nasties, if it also remembers which version of you.
That's without knowing enough to have an opinion.
-Original
Tobias Weingartner wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, Dave Feustel wrote:
I found out via a google search on 'tickets sudo' about
the behavior I had discovered and reported. Then after Otto
let me know how pathetic my post was, I went back to man sudo
but found nothing about tickets
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:35:58 -0500, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
J.C. Roberts wrote:
As others have pointed out, you simply misunderstood the article and
then posted to the list what many people would consider an inflammatory
question. This is not the
Dave Feustel wrote:
[snip]
Well, I'm lazy, so I let pf drop all unsolicited incoming
traffic. Works Great!
Lets me experiment with my system in peace and safety.
Not really.
Depends on what you can be conned into soliciting.
Just in case?
Like just in case a moth is drawn to a flame?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dave Feustel
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mats O Jansson; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: X11 Demo programs
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:00:24PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I would expect the people writing books, specially on OpenBSD to know a
lots more then me, so that I can learn from them, but if what
you say is
true, it make me question my idea and intention of buying
It's a lot like mountain climbing.
People do it, although personally I can't really imagine why.
Because it's there. Because they can. That's why. It is not rational.
Nice words maybe don't hurt, but at that level are certainly irrelevant.
Me, I lurk on this list because of the attitude and the
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I'm not saying that having a blobbed driver in-tree would be an
improvement - however, a machine that runs is likely to be an
improvement over one that doesn't, at least for a while (because, as
pointed out, bugs like blobs).
I prefer looking at what's supported first
Chris Kuethe wrote:
On 06 Apr 2006 18:12:59 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
Given the cost of programmer time (and the cost of lost data) vs the
cost of a slightly faster processor, is it ever really worth it even
if MySQL is *twice* as fast?
Yes.
Example 1:
Josh Tolley wrote:
On 4/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As to losing data, I suspect you'd lose a lot more
from PostgreSQL than MySQL on a failing hard drive.
Any particular reason for that suspicion? I ask out of genuine
interest, and I promise I don't want to start a
Dave Feustel wrote:
I got my 3.9 Cdrom set yesterday and today started installing
it on an external usb disk so as not to wipe out my existing
3.8 setup. When I got to the disk partition, I erased the existing
'a' partition (dos) and created a new bsd 'a' partition. The partition
had a
Dave Feustel wrote:
On Sunday 09 April 2006 16:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something is very confused.
I do not believe an existing 'a' partition (dos).
I bought the disk at Best Buy and copied a few files from
/home/daf to test the disk. The files were copied to the
usb-connected
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
To increase the security level of my OpenBSD system I have defined at
/etc/fstab that the root partition should be read only. /etc/fstab
follows:
Me, I just lurk here but:
1) if having / ro would actually improve security,
they would have done so long
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 24.04.2006 at 15:30:55 -0400, Matthew Closson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ wrong IP address ]
What could that be, and why can't I see this address anywhere?
I'd rather not reboot only to make a change in IP numbers effective...
Can you send us
js wrote:
2006/4/28, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wonder why http://www.openbsd.org/books.html still recommend old
daemon book, The Design and Implementation of the 4.4 BSD Operating
System?
As most of you know, there's newer version, The Design and
Implementation of the
prad wrote:
[snip]
(curiously, i've found on my system at least that some
things seem
to work faster on openbsd than freebsd.)
Shouldn't be a surprise, really.
Efficiency is really more a case of never being too inefficient
rather that occasionally being very efficient. (ie hard.)
Anything
S t i n g r a y wrote:
Now what i want to know , maybe is O T in this list
but what is the diffrence , i mean pf in openBSD is
refered to as a firewall for home or small offices ?
why is that , i mean what is the criteria of an
enterprise firewall what is the diffrence between pf
MS ISA /
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 4/30/06, Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I wonder what the preferred style of return statments is -- for
returning simple values, both styles
return foo;
and
return (foo);
are used in the sources everythen and now. For
Anton Karpov wrote
If he can break in as a lowly user uname -a will tell him what it is
anyway. And don't tell me we should disable that command or cause it to
lie because then I'll shoot you down another way.
Re-read my message, please. I didn't tell he cannot stat os version and
Cristiano Deana wrote:
Hi,
i'm new on OpenBSD. I just installed 3.9 (one week ago sources)
and i got this:
$ uname -rs
OpenBSD 3.9
$ su
Password:
you are not in group wheel
Sorry
$ whoami
cris
$ id cris
uid=1000(cris) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel)
$ grep cris /etc/passwd
Paulo Manoel Mafra wrote:
Hi misc,
I would like to create a large partition on a disk, but this disk has a
known bad block. How could I create the partition without the bad block ?
One solution is to create two partitions without the bad block and use
ccd. Is there another solution ?
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Key mananagement is the most important part. The part that
continuously will require time and attention from a lot of people, and
the part that will cause the headaches. The part where the errors
will be made. System managers experiencing problems and needing to
get
Andy Ruhl wrote:
On 8/30/06, Charles M. Hannum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance. It has
Let me start by saying I'm probably not qualified to reply to this
thread, but I was never worried about making a fool out of myself
before so
Theo de Raadt wrote:
[snip]
We know one reason why we never got documentation. Bit by bit more
information has come out to show that the hardware design is an
embarrasment and there are countless bugs and shortcomings.
Surprising? Not really.
Affects ONLY OpenBSD? Not a chance.
That's why
Greetings!
~
Merry Christmas!
Wishing you...
and your family the Christmas season's joys and
wonders. Enjoy the holiday.
Sincerely,
AnthonysTshirts.com
~
AnthonysTshirts.com
2269 S. University Drive -
design
Its website
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-April/240174.html
-
Thanks!
Tony
are on me!
Tony
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
I'm about to write an article on OpenBSD's brilliant design, mainly to
make
things clearer to myself as well as my coworkers - all of whom have been
using FreeBSD for the past 15 years. All of whom
I've since been advised that a show of appreciation is better expressed
through donations. And they're coming - you have my word.
Tony
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Tony ableton...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Theo,
This was not meant as a troll, sorry if it came off like that.
It was more
of pull
requests, mostly on the documentation side though.
Tony
from all worlds?
Tony
http://soundcloud.com/abletony84
one path go down, the bgp session will go down and your network
will re-route.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
spkr0 at pcppi0
sysbeep0 at pcppi0
dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does
not help
Thanks for not taking the easy route.
Changes are always painful, but if they deliver then it's worth it.
Is there a way to compile something on i386 OpenBSD box to run on amd64?
or is there a sysctl option I am missing?
Thanks.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does
not help
architecture of input file `some.o' is
incompatible with i386:x86-64 output
Is compiling this way possible at all?
Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 29 August 2005 16:34 -0500, Tony Lambiris wrote:
Is there a way to compile something on i386 OpenBSD box
I actually hacked an existing util for NetBSD to run flawlessly on
OpenBSD (I have a Dell inspiron 700m).
You can get it here:
http://lysergik.com/~tony/openbsd.phtml
Baldur Sigurpsson wrote:
hi
use this thing:
http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/i855vidctl/
just remember to put the command
I know this will run fine, but will the dual-core and such be detected
and setup correctly, or is this an amd64 specific thing?
TIA.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does
.
Is there any vendor that doesn't do that ?
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
in internet/universe behaviour shows that
there is an infinite amount of porn, you just have to tweak
net.inet.somaxporn correctly.
/Tony
I use OpenBSD boxes with a few 4xFE on two sites as switches/routers =)
I'm am happier with them than the cheapo switches I replaced.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
1 - 100 of 672 matches
Mail list logo
