Re: Dovecot OpenBSD 7.2 VM
On 11/8/2022 6:50 PM, latin...@vcn.bc.ca wrote: Hello misc Is there a problem installing Dovecot? Thanks I have 2 VMs upgraded working correctly, this is a new installation of Dovecot at Vultr. # pkg_add dovecot quirks-6.42 signed on 2022-10-30T18:56:25Z Can't install dovecot-2.3.19.1p0v0 because of libraries |library iconv.7.1 not found | /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.7.0 (libiconv-1.16p0): minor is too small |library sqlite3.37.20 not found | /usr/local/lib/libsqlite3.so.37.15 (sqlite3-3.38.3): minor is too small Direct dependencies for dovecot-2.3.19.1p0v0 resolve to icu4c-71.1v0 libstemmer-2.1.0 lz4-1.9.4 xz-5.2.5p1 libexttextcat-3.4.6 sqlite3-3.38.3 bzip2-1.0.8p0 libsodium-1.0.18p1 zstd-1.5.2 libiconv-1.16p0 Full dependency tree is icu4c-71.1v0 libstemmer-2.1.0 lz4-1.9.4 xz-5.2.5p1 sqlite3-3.38.3 libexttextcat-3.4.6 libsodium-1.0.18p1 bzip2-1.0.8p0 libiconv-1.16p0 zstd-1.5.2 Couldn't install dovecot-2.3.19.1p0v0 The system needs to have its packages updated. Those are not 7.2 packages.
Re: 50Gbe
Only bnxt and mcx support 50. Intel chips that do are 800 series, beyond ixl. On August 11, 2021 5:13:11 p.m. Chris Cappuccio wrote: ha...@sdf.org [ha...@sdf.org] wrote: > Hi folks! > > I wonder if OBSD supports 50Gbe network cards. And what is the cable > standard to support such data transfers ? > > Thanks. > > -- > The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolves do not perform > in the circus $ apropos 50gb bnxt(4) - Broadcom NetXtreme-C/E 10/25/40/50Gb Ethernet device https://man.openbsd.org/bnxt.4 mcx and ixl cards are the most likely 10/25/40/50/100 GbE chips to be well supported, bnxt doesn't even support per-CPU queues yet Sent with Aqua Mail for Android https://www.mobisystems.com/aqua-mail
Re: Dovecot maildir sync not working after upgrade to 6.9
Hi William, I would try posting what you have to the Dovecot mailing list and see what Aki says. On May 17, 2021 7:18:35 a.m. William Orr wrote: Hey, I have two mailservers running OpenBSD 6.9, and I use bidirectional syncing of my maildirs through doveadm, part of dovecot. After the upgrade, I noticed that the sync process was failing. Here's a sample run: kefka|~|02:57:05|0$ doas doveadm sync -u w...@worrbase.com remote:sabin.worrbase.com doveadm(VERSION dsync 3 5): Error: User doesn't exist dsync-local(worr): Error: read(sabin.worrbase.com) failed: EOF (version not received) dsync-local(worr): Error: Remote command returned error 67: /usr/bin/ssh -i /root/.ssh/id_ed25519.dsync sabin.worrbase.com /usr/local/bin/dsync-in-wrapper.sh kefka|~|02:57:08|75$ cat /usr/local/bin/dsync-in-wrapper.sh #!/bin/ksh read username /usr/local/bin/doveadm dsync-server -u "$username" I ktraced the process, and noticed that in the communication with the remote mail server, that a bunch of doveadm plugins fail to load. It's worth noting that these are plugins that are dlopen(3)ed in response to certain commands sent over the wire, so they don't show up in ldd(1) output. kefka|~|03:00:08|0$ doas kdump | grep symbol "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_user_module' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_mailbox_get_aclobj' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_mailbox_list_get_backend' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_object_list_init' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_object_list_next' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_backend_rights_match_me' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_rights_get_id' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_object_list_deinit' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_object_get_my_rights' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_rights_update_import' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_mailbox_update_acl' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_lookup_dict_rebuild' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_backend_nonowner_lookups_iter_init' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_backend_nonowner_lookups_iter_next' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_backend_nonowner_lookups_iter_deinit' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_backend_nonowner_lookups_rebuild' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_lookup_dict_is_enabled' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_lookup_dict_iterate_visible_init' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_lookup_dict_iterate_visible_next' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'acl_lookup_dict_iterate_visible_deinit' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'quota_user_module' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'quota_root_get_resources' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'quota_get_resource' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib20_doveadm_fts_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'fts_list_backend' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib20_doveadm_fts_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'fts_backend_lookup' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib20_doveadm_fts_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'fts_backend_lookup_done' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib20_doveadm_fts_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'fts_search_args_expand' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib20_doveadm_fts_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'fts_language_find' "doveadm:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib20_doveadm_fts_plugin.so: undefined symbol 'fts_user_get_language_list'
Re: OpenLDAP under 6.8 - no intermediate certs in chain
On 11/16/2020 12:08 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote: I just updated one of my servers running 6.7 to 6.8, and am having a problem with openldap. I have the intermediate cert and root CA in a file referenced by the openldap config: TLSCACertificateFile/etc/openldap/cabundle.crt Under 6.7 with the openldap port from that version, this results in the chain being served: Certificate chain 0 s:CN = ldap-netsvc.pbhware.com i:C = US, O = Let's Encrypt, CN = Let's Encrypt Authority X3 1 s:C = US, O = Let's Encrypt, CN = Let's Encrypt Authority X3 i:O = Digital Signature Trust Co., CN = DST Root CA X3 2 s:O = Digital Signature Trust Co., CN = DST Root CA X3 i:O = Digital Signature Trust Co., CN = DST Root CA X3 However, under 6.8 with the newer openldap 2.4.53 port, only the server cert itself is being served, not the intermediate or root: Certificate chain 0 s:CN = ldap-netsvc.pbhware.com i:C = US, O = Let's Encrypt, CN = Let's Encrypt Authority X3 This of course causes clients to fail to validate the server cert :(. I'm running openldap 2.4.53 on other operating systems and as far as I know there's no change in behavior with it. So I'm guessing there's an interoperability issue between openbsd libressl and openldap that's causing this problem? Do I need to configure something differently? Any other suggestions? Thanks much... I remember seeing this commit recently. Not sure if this is your problem or not. https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs=160511882917510=2
Re: OpenBSD UEFI on QEMU emulator
On 10/22/2020 11:22 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:37:31PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: On 10/22/2020 9:59 PM, Kevin Shell wrote: Hello misc@. I want to try out OpenBSD UEFI. How to install OpenBSD with UEFI boot on qemu? The installer does prompt you during disk setup. The install68.iso has no UEFI support. This is not true. It does not include a fat fs el torito image with efiboot only cdbr for mbr. Ya, my bad. I interpreted what he meant there differently. I thought he was implying there was no EFI support at all post-install. On any X86 hardware where I don't run Windows I typically keep CSM enabled. As I find I am more likely to have to boot something that still requires MBR like from a USB key to do firmware updates, though I have seen some EFI compatible update images for some things. But I have heard of systems without CSM, since it is optional. I see how this would be an issue with EFI only environments.
Re: OpenBSD UEFI on QEMU emulator
On 10/22/2020 9:59 PM, Kevin Shell wrote: Hello misc@. I want to try out OpenBSD UEFI. How to install OpenBSD with UEFI boot on qemu? The installer does prompt you during disk setup. The install68.iso has no UEFI support. This is not true. My following command on Linux can't boot OpenBSD UEFI. qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm \ -machine q35 \ -cpu host \ -smp cores=4,threads=1 \ -m 1G \ -bios /usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.fd \ -drive file=install68.img,format=raw -- kevin
Re: WLAN roaming?
On 01/01/15 17:14, Christian Weisgerber wrote: My OpenBSD laptop, iwn(4), doesn't roam between my two access points. It's a sorry sight when it struggles to push a signal through the rebar floor instead of switching over to the other access point a meter away. Is this a limitation of OpenBSD's WLAN support or should I blame the access points? (Two stupid consumer APs with the same SSID and on the same network segment.) Searching for WLAN roaming leads to vague references to IEEE 802.11f, but it's unclear to me whether this is required for roaming or just intended to improve it. Roaming is done by the client. This is an OpenBSD issue. It needs the relevant support in the drivers and 802.11 layer. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: DigitalOcean's BSD debut is FreeBSD only
On 12/18/14 13:57, Mike Larkin wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:24:45PM -0600, Adam Thompson wrote: On 14-12-18 12:06 PM, andrew fabbro wrote: In short - the list of VPS providers who can support OpenBSD is actually very big. I have to take issue with that statement... The list of VPS providers where OpenBSD will run, more or less correctly, more or less all of the time, is actually very big. It will even run correctly all of the time on a fairly large list of providers. However, the list of VPS providers who are willing to *support* OpenBSD is extremely small. What do you do if one day you're only getting 100kbps throughput? Call support, who - as soon as they learn you're running OpenBSD - tell you that's not supported, sorry and hang up. When ACPI goes haywire (normal under KVM so far)... same thing. Not naming names, And your bug report for this is ... where? It was a hypothetical situation not a known issue. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Dovecot happy on 5.6?
On 12/15/14 23:48, Rod Whitworth wrote: I have been trying out dovecot for some years and it has always had some irritating bug or limitation and I have seen a few gripes from others. It seems to have been very quiet lately so I thought I'd have another attempt to get it running whilst choosing options that look like ones to suit me. It's been quiet because the bugs in OpenBSD were fixed and it just works. It works fine for tons of people. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OpenBSD 5.6/current on Soekris 6501-70
On 12/08/14 05:12, mxb wrote: We have exactly this model. tcpbench from base gave only around 340Mbit/s on those. So CPU is probably one problem on those boards. tcpbench done against 1U machines with better CPU and doing almost line rate on 1G NIC. I didn't want to quote any particular numbers as I do not have any benchmarks but I was thinking in the hundreds of Mb/s range but not really high. The unfortunate reality is systems of this class are fine for low end to mid range use but are CPU limited for anything further. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OpenBSD Trademark Policy
On 12/07/14 03:35, Riley Baird wrote: As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has excellent security, and I would like to create a version without the binary-only microcode included. Doesn't really make any sense why. But either way hopefully you're not using common hardware like AMD GPUs or Intel Wifi otherwise that is pretty crippling. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OpenBSD Trademark Policy
On 12/07/14 04:29, Riley Baird wrote: However, remember that if someone doesn't know much about OpenBSD, they will either: a) think that OpenBSD does not contain binary-only firmware due to the Blob-Busters marketing or b) not know where to look to remove it should they wish to Your interpretation of the marketing is flawed. The marketing about blobs was about device drivers in the kernel only. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OpenBSD Trademark Policy
On 12/07/14 05:18, Riley Baird wrote:
On 07/12/14 20:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:29:48PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
On 07/12/14 20:20, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Riley Baird said:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has
excellent security, and I would like to create a version without the
binary-only microcode included.
Isn't it easier to just do
# cd /mnt/etc; tar czf firmware{.tgz,}; rm -R firmware
from bsd.rd after installer exits?
Yes, it definitely would be. You'd also need to change the installer
script such that fw_update is not run on first boot. I've removed the
firmware from my own system already. Also, it would be nice to be able
to build the source tree without requiring the firmware files to exist.
However, remember that if someone doesn't know much about OpenBSD, they
will either: a) think that OpenBSD does not contain binary-only firmware
due to the Blob-Busters marketing or b) not know where to look to
remove it should they wish to
The blobs we do not like are pieces of code running inside the kernel.
Code running on a device is a completely different category.
True, but the press releases never even mentioned the microcode, which
is kind of confusing given the normal usage of the word binary blob.
Blobs are vendor-compiled binary drivers without any source code.
That couldn't be more clear what the projects meaning of blobs is.
Microcode won't be mentioned when it is already pretty clear what the
meaning is. Nothing to be confused about there at all. That is your
interpretation of the meaning and not the common use.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Re: OpenBSD 5.6/current on Soekris 6501-70
On 12/07/14 21:18, Martin Hanson wrote: I would like to be able to run ~100-120 MB/s from one NIC to the other on this box, if possible? The NICs should be fine but I'd be worried that even the -70 model would be CPU limited for such throughput. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OpenBSD embedded?
On 12/04/14 07:05, Alan McKay wrote: On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Vivek Vinod vi...@icanconnect.com wrote: We have been using Mikrotik routerboards since 7 years Huh? With OpenBSD on them? There are 3 PowerPC based RouterBOARDs. AFAIK the RB600 is supported at the moment by the socppc port. The RB800 and RB850Gx2 boards would probably be relatively easy to add support for. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OT:Password strength
On 11/30/14 15:20, Ted Unangst wrote: Examples: treetykaveprethicooputhedu soonataviceenoopatecoge gootrozapiceelytrithunula preezypeendothanundipeesooka That defeats the purpose of the second example in the OPs question. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OT:Password strength
On 12/03/14 15:04, Ted Unangst wrote: On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:27, Brad Smith wrote: On 11/30/14 15:20, Ted Unangst wrote: Examples: treetykaveprethicooputhedu soonataviceenoopatecoge gootrozapiceelytrithunula preezypeendothanundipeesooka That defeats the purpose of the second example in the OPs question. If you want strong, short passwords that look ridiculous: dd if=/dev/random bs=1 count=9 | b64encode password Still not getting it. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Poor disk performance
On 11/27/14 10:57, David Unric wrote: Hello, I'd like to figure out what causes very low performance of disk operations on my laptop. I've tested it by unpacking gzipped tar archive ( http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/OpenBSD/5.6/src.tar.gz) about 125 MiB big. On the same machine, not cached, various results by operating system: NetBSD 6.1.522 secs Linux 3.14.228 secs OpenBSD 5.6 aborted after 10 minutes as still not finished Unpacking was done with `tar xzf src.tar.gz', even tried on uncompressed src.tar but roughly same results. By comparing with more similar NetBSD I've found the SATA disk is attached differently: - in OpenBSD detected as SCSI, `sd' driver used, no sign of Ultra-DMA access - in NetBSD detected as (SATA) IDE, `wd' driver used, UDMA/133 activated I've tried mount the partition with softdeps and noatime options, but that's only a slight improvement. Any idea how to fix this issue (like forcing use of wd?) or I'm out of luck and my 750GB Hitachi SATA IDE is unsupported in OpenBSD and no generic driver can be used ? Reply with the output of dmesg to the list as a start. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Packet Filter router i368 vs 64bit
On 11/27/14 22:35, jungle Boogie wrote: Hello All, On 25 November 2014 at 12:52, Motty Cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I am searching for hardware to build a router with OpenBSD. I have found mixed signals as to fastest system with i386 or 64bit. I know in the past i386 OpenBSD used to perform a lot better than 64bit system. I'm in similar situation as Motty, I'd like an OBSd to use for pf. I'm interested in this: http://store.netgate.com/kit-APU1C4.aspx with the msata drive. Anyone have any objections? I know the NICs are not intel so that will probably get a strike against it, but I like the low power. Unless you guys give some sort of hints as to what these routers and / or firewalls are going to be used for just asking for hardware recommendations without such details is useless. What sort of throughput / packets per second do you forsee on the inside network? What is your target or expectation? If there is a WAN connection how fast is it? Are you lucky enough to have Gbit or is it only say a 50Mbps connection? Those types of details matter. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Packet Filter router i368 vs 64bit
On 11/27/14 23:50, jungle Boogie wrote: Hi, On 27 November 2014 at 20:38, thev...@openmailbox.org wrote: you can just use old hardware for these purposes. from the man who literally wrote the book on pf (from pf tutorial via http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/long-firewall.html): I have not seen comparable tests performed recently [3.1 era], but in my own experience and that of others, the PF filtering overhead is pretty much negligible. As one data point, the machine which gateways between one of the networks where I've done a bit of work and the world is a Pentium III 450MHz with 384MB of RAM. When I've remembered to check, I've never seen the machine at less than 96 percent 'idle' according to top. Yes, that's true! But less fun. ;) I do have some Dell dimensions machine with OpenBSD -current running now that I could easily get two NICs but its kinda old and slow to update current. I'll measure the power to see how much it uses. With the fact that old hardware, why would the APU be OK and not good? I don't see anyone claiming it would not be good. It's more like if you happen to have some old hw around that it would probably be good enough for what you're describing but the APU system would also do the job just fine. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Packet Filter router i368 vs 64bit
On 11/25/14 18:18, motty cruz wrote: Thank you Juan, I appreciate your suggestions and advice. I am planning on using Dual socket B2 (LGA 1356) supports Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2400 v2, I suppose i386 would perform better rather than 64bit amd processor. Thank you again! The amd64 arch runs on any modern Intel CPU as well as AMD CPUs (as well as VIA). amd64 refers to the ISA not that it will only run on AMD CPUs. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Postfix compilation error.
On 11/11/14 15:51, giacomo wrote: Hi at all, I try to compile postfix on OpenBSD 5.6 with command # env FLAVOR=mysql sasl2 make install for install it with mysql and sasl2 support. I have compiled it in OpenBSD 5.5 and 5.4 without problem. My system is upgrated from 5.4 to 5.5 and to 5.6 The compiler show: While upgrading your system you haven't followed the upgrade guide to clean out old unused cruft from your system.. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade55.html http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade56.html The Files to delete and move section. /usr/local/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib -lpcre /usr/local/lib/libmysqlclient.so.23.0: warning: stpcpy() is dangerous; do not use it ../../lib/libutil.a(concatenate.o)(.text+0x77): In function `concatenate': : warning: strcpy() is almost always misused, please use strlcpy() ../../lib/libutil.a(concatenate.o)(.text+0x88): In function `concatenate': : warning: strcat() is almost always misused, please use strlcat() ../../lib/libglobal.a(mail_conf_time.o)(.text+0x46): In function `set_mail_conf_time_int': : warning: sprintf() is often misused, please use snprintf() /usr/bin/ld: warning: libcrypto.so.23.0, needed by /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3.0, may conflict with libcrypto.so.30.0 /usr/bin/ld: warning: libroken.so.1.0, needed by /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3.0, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libssl.so.20.0, needed by /usr/local/lib/libmysqlclient.so.23.0, may conflict with libssl.so.27.0 /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.7.1: undefined reference to `ct_memcmp' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_cloexec_dir' /usr/lib/libasn1.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_strpoolcollect' /usr/lib/libasn1.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_hex_encode' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_strupr' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `net_write' /usr/lib/libasn1.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_hex_decode' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_bswap16' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_bswap32' /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.7.1: undefined reference to `rk_cloexec_file' /usr/lib/libasn1.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_strpoolprintf' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `arg_printusage' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `roken_gethostby_setup' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_estrdup' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_dns_free_data' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `base64_encode' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_socket_sockaddr_size' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_dns_lookup' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_socket_get_port' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `net_read' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_strlwr' /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.7.1: undefined reference to `issuid' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_cloexec' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `roken_gethostbyname' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `getarg' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_strsep_copy' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `parse_time' /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.20.0: undefined reference to `rk_dns_srv_order' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error 1 in src/master (Makefile:72 'master') *** Error 1 in /usr/ports/pobj/postfix-2.12.20140701-sasl2-mysql/postfix-2.12-20140701 (Makefile:83 'update') *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2727 '/usr/ports/pobj/postfix-2.12.20140701-sasl2-mysql/.build_done') *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:1922 '/usr/ports/packages/i386/all/postfix-2.12.20140701-sasl2-mysql.tgz') *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2475 '_internal-package') *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2455 'package') *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:1939 '/var/db/pkg/postfix-2.12.20140701-sasl2-mysql/+CONTENTS') *** Error 1 in /usr/ports/mail/postfix/snapshot (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2455 'install') What is the problem? Has been lost something? Thanks. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: search mailing list
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 03:21:00PM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: Is there an archive of the mailing list that is keyword searchable? http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html At the bottom of the page. The first two entries. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: openbsdstore: enable javascript and buy something or gtfo
On 06/10/14 9:01 PM, Matti Karnaattu wrote: Browsers are getting slower all the time. Bullshit. Try this: http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com Actually it isn't bullshit. It is the truth. You just fail to understand what he means. Newer browsers run software faster. Ancient browsers may even fail tests. and yet browsers on some of my systems run software slower and each release is getting slower and slower. There is no good reason a quad core system with 6GB of RAM should run a browser like its molasses on a cold winter day, but that's the way it is with the bloated ass crap we have called web browsers. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: chroot libressl
On 15/09/14 12:42 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: The pound man page says that OpenSSL requires access to /dev/urandom. AFAIK that is a generic comment that isn't the case for OpenBSD. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Good thing
On 11/08/14 3:02 AM, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: Good thing OpenBSD didn't go down the multiple versions path. The point of your sarcastic post is? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Good thing
On 11/08/14 3:10 AM, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: On 08/11/14 09:04, Brad Smith wrote: On 11/08/14 3:02 AM, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: Good thing OpenBSD didn't go down the multiple versions path. The point of your sarcastic post is? If I explain, will you ask what the point of my explanation is? You're stuck in an eternal loop. So I'll take it you're just trying to make yourself look like a fool. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Good thing
On 11/08/14 3:16 AM, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: On 08/11/14 09:10, Brad Smith wrote: On 11/08/14 3:10 AM, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: On 08/11/14 09:04, Brad Smith wrote: On 11/08/14 3:02 AM, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: Good thing OpenBSD didn't go down the multiple versions path. The point of your sarcastic post is? If I explain, will you ask what the point of my explanation is? You're stuck in an eternal loop. So I'll take it you're just trying to make yourself look like a fool. Okay. Well, what I mean is, you are hypocrites. This isn't a venting list for your retarded bullshit. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Sysmerge problem with xetc56.tgz on July 16 amd64 snapshot
On 17/07/14 7:24 PM, Edd Barrett wrote: FWIW, I have the same here. I also notice that xdm did not start as it usually does. +1 I noticed the same issue the other day updating my systems. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: unbound missing on sgi?
On 14/07/14 12:09 AM, Johan Hattne wrote: I would have expected to find unbound(8) on my 5.5 sgi machine, but I can’t and neither can locate(1). Any clues as to what’s going on? Unbound didn't exist with 5.5 so of course it won't be there. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: issues with firefox
On 12/07/14 3:46 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote: Kevin Chadwick [ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk] wrote: I'm guessing this is due to the new KMS 3d support not being as fast right now but much better than you had before. It also affects Thunderbird. Here's my synopsis of Mark Kettenis's analysis: The quoted text from Kevin is out of context. He was replying to the paragraph regarding video playback performance, but KMS isn't the issue there. Firefox uses an old version of cairo. This cairo library uses XGetImage to get the image copied back to a ZPixmap in user space. It copies with a 4k buffer size (the default). So your extremely large, uncompressed image gets copied in 4k chunks with constant context switches. Not only do the subsystems thrash themselves, but the server sends the image in non-blocking mode, and the socket buffer is full, it fails with EAGAIN and discards the data already sent by copying the remaining data to the start of the buffer, waits for the socket to drain and tries again when the socket is ready. You can find Mark's buffer size improvement here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.cvs/128950 http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2014-March/041543.html This makes the problem less apparent. Some in the ports tree tried using a newer cairo and found a whole new set of problems (apparently firefox depends on old cairo and/or local modifications to it) Why Firefox needs a ZPixmap of the image displayed, that is, the entire fully uncompressed image copied back to userland in 4k (or 64k) chunks, that's totally beyond me, by itself. Why the X server does it in such a poor way, beyond me. It's crazyland!!! Playing video in browsers and even displaying pictures is a surprisingly resource hungry task with umpteen potential rules working out what shape and where everything should be and unfortunately more effort has been spent on javascript performance than rendering. These issues are not directly related (and largely solved when the X clients use the right techniques, which sometimes vary between platforms and display drivers) The video playback issues are more to do with the relatively poor MP / pthreads performance on OpenBSD. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Dragonflybsd's pf concurrent instead of single-threaded
On 05/07/14 8:01 PM, Predrag Punosevac wrote: Franco Fichtner write: I have immense respect for Matt as a user of his code since Amiga C compiler. I probably speak for lots of people both in OpenBSD and DragonFly camp if I say that I would prefer him to finish HAMMER2 and leave concurrent threading in PF to Henning. Talks about this date back at least two years. These days NetBSD is doing npf(4), and FreeBSD and DragonFly moved on to implement their own SMP support. The rumors are that npf is a vaporware. DragonFly community is tiny. So tiny that in-spite of HAMMER I could not use DragonFly on my production file servers because it lacks LDAP support let alone NFSv4. FreeBSD always had its own genuine firewall solution IPFW. IPFW is so good that inspired even a better tool called iptables. Some people unfortunately didn't buy it. OS X switched from IPFW to PF couple releases ago. Missing SMP support is the fork in the road. The window of opportunity seems to be closing. A penny for Henning's thoughts on this... I would say it is about a time. PF has never meant to be portable. A quick look on the version of PF in use in other BSDs is quite revealing. That being said OpenBSD project has its own pace which has never being dictated by current fashion trends or a noise made by people like me who don't contribute the code. Thanks God for that! What is the point of your posts other than filling peoples mail boxes with useless bits? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Intel Dual Band Wireless AC 7260 support on the horizon?
On 02/07/14 2:59 PM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: While I was shopping around for a new laptop to replace my aging Thinkpad SL500 I noticed that the Thinkpad's /etc/firmware directory had a file called iwn-7260, so when I couldn't get the Atheros AR9485 included in one recent laptop here to work (and seeing it is included in various other laptop models), I bought one Intel 7260 to play with. However, the card comes up unconfigured: pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 Intel Dual Band Wireless AC 7260 rev 0x73 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 not configured Have I stumbled onto a new variant, or have I made some silly mistake along the way? The firmware was added so it is already included in the package when and if someone adds the relevant code to iwn(4) to support the 7260 / 3160 controllers but to date the driver does not support these controllers. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: LAN vs VLAN interface performance
On 24/06/14 3:08 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote: Kapetanakis Giannis [bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr] wrote: On 23/06/14 21:33, Henning Brauer wrote: * Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net [2014-06-23 20:24]: I have a sandy bridge Xeon box with PF NAT that handles a daily 200 to 700Mbps. It has a single myx interface using OpenBSD 5.5 (not current). It does nothing but PF NAT and related routing. No barage of vlans or interfaces. No dynamic routing. Nothing else. 60,000 to 100,000 states. With an MP kernel, kern.netlivelocks increases by something like 150,000 per day!! I The packet loss was notable. With an SP kernel, the 'netlivelock' counter barely moves. Maybe 100 per day on average, but for the past week, maybe 5. as already said in private, I'm not seeing anything like that which makes me wonder what is different for you. Me neither # uname -a OpenBSD server 5.5 GENERIC.MP#156 i386 I'm using amd64... sysctl -a|grep netlive kern.netlivelocks=50 # pfctl -ss|wc -l 73203 # pfctl -sr|wc -l 294 routing/firewalling/some NAT at ~ 500Mbps I have some ideas. I'm going to do some troubleshooting when I have a chance to think clearly. I think the disk subsystem could be part of the issue. I see the most netlivelocks on a box with a USB key, mfi is in second place. This reminds me of a system I had mentioned to you in the past. Checking that system again I noticed since switching it from spinning rust to SSDs that the number of livelocks seems to have gone down. # sysctl -a | grep livelocks kern.netlivelocks=4163 # uptime 3:23PM up 1 day, 45 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.79, 0.91, 0.83 # sysctl -a | grep livelocks kern.netlivelocks=4190 # uptime 3:37PM up 1 day, 59 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.67, 0.99, 0.87 Before the switch that would be up into the tens of thousands by now. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: dovecot issues
On 21/06/14 3:21 PM, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
On 06/21/2014 02:17 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:37:07PM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
On 06/20/2014 11:20 PM, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
On 06/20/2014 10:58 PM, Mike Bregg wrote:
On 2014-06-20 21:14, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
On 06/20/2014 10:05 PM, Mike Bregg wrote:
On 2014-06-20 20:48, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
I'm trying to setup dovecot with opensmtpd and I'm getting the
following
errors for dovecot.
Jun 20 21:41:04 auth-worker(10932): Fatal:
pool_system_realloc(268435456): Out of memory
Jun 20 21:41:04 auth-worker(10932): Fatal: master:
service(auth-worker):
child 10932 returned error 83 (Out of memory (service auth-worker {
vsz_limit=256 MB }, you may need to increase it) - set CORE_OUTOFMEM=1
environment to get core dump)
Jun 20 21:41:04 auth: Error: auth worker: Aborted request: Worker
process died unexpectedly
Jun 20 21:41:10 auth-worker(12071): Fatal:
pool_system_realloc(268435456): Out of memory
Jun 20 21:41:10 auth: Error: auth worker: Aborted request: Worker
process died unexpectedly
Jun 20 21:41:10 auth-worker(12071): Fatal: master:
service(auth-worker):
child 12071 returned error 83 (Out of memory (service auth-worker {
vsz_limit=256 MB }, you may need to increase it) - set CORE_OUTOFMEM=1
environment to get core dump)
You could try increasing vsz_limit to something like 512 MB. Do you
have mailboxes with a large quantity of emails (as in thousands) that
256 MB isn't enough?
Mike
I felt like that was a clue, but have no idea how to set vsz_limit,
however there is no mail on the system. I got those errors just testing
imap login from mutt.
Have a look through the config files in /etc/dovecot/conf.d
Mike
Yeah I found it hiding out in 10-master.conf upped it to 512MB as
suggested with no luck. Then just for fun I upped it to 5000M and still
no luck.
Edgar
I just noticed in the log even after raising vsz_limit the error remains
the same claiming vsz_limit=256MB
This is a know bug. If an unknown user tries to log in, the login code
goes into a loop expanding a buffer until it runs out of mem. The
cause of the bug is also known, but nobody (including myself) came up
with a diff yet.
The login process gets rsstarted, so there is no immediate functional
problem, apart from the log being filled.
-Otto
Thanks for all the replies. Not sure what I was doing wrong I was
trying to use bsdauth, but could never get it to let me login. Switched
to MySql and its working. No more memory errors in the log.
Of course there are no more memory errors when you changed the
authentication mechanism. Otto mentioned to you the reason for the
errors.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Re: Very slow I/O under OpenBSD i386 on qemu-kvm from RHEL7rc
On 17/06/14 4:56 AM, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:07:39PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: previously on this list Mikolaj Kucharski contributed: by disabling mpbios on OpenBSD and falling back to the old pic controller, in this case you I cannot find how to enable 'the old pic controller' in libvirt with qemu-kvm. Do you know by any chance how to enable it? I believe he means disabling mpbios at OpenBSD's boot or in boot.conf means KVM will automatically fall back. Virtual hosting companies like arpnetworks generally ask you to do this for OpenBSD. boot -c disable mpbios Ah, I got confused. Yes, I'm aware of this, as I've seen this on the list archives mentioned few times. I actually tested this, and I don't see any difference. See at my below tests: Because ACPI is in use which takes higher precedence over MP BIOS. You have to disable acpimadt. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: jun 12 snapshot freeze on boot.
On 14/06/14 6:00 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 09:44:29AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014-06-13, Rodrigo Mosconi open...@mosconi.mat.br wrote: Unfortunately, I don`t manage the Host system. The freeze server is a vps machine from arpnetworks... You didn't mention at what point it freezes, which may be useful information. BTW ARP Networks are in a round of host OS upgrades so this problem might go away. This might be relevant http://support.arpnetworks.com/kb/vps/openbsd-hangs-at-setting-tty-flags-when-i-use-a-custom-kernel I think kettenis commited something that made that no longer necessary. 4.5 is pretty old ;) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: xSSL stuff
On 12/06/14 11:43 PM, Christian Pedaschus wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:14:46 -0600 Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote: I was reading stuff in misc@ about OpenSSL broken things. I see people from OpenBSD started LibreSSL project and they are forking OpenSSL and remove the bad code. This is past, but I see more and more lesions are discovered. It may be a stupid question, but having all these, isn't more efficient to start LibreSSL from zero? Impossible. The OpenSSL API was built up through accretion over almost 2 decades. It is fat, bloated, repetitive, and tricky. In general, application authors have chosen to use the first API's they spot which provide the functionality they need. As a result, almost all of the bloated API is potentially used in the greater ecosystem. It is quite simply impossible to reinvent this particular wheel. Any effort to reinvent it would be highly incompatible. Features and warts are too closely coupled. wouldn't it be a feature? less warts, less bugs, less features, less compatible, but secure? What good is having a brand new from scratch API when almost nothing uses it? There are thousands of apps / libraries using OpenSSL. Are YOU going to go to each and every project and write SSL code for each respective project to add support for this from scratch API? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: xSSL stuff
On 12/06/14 11:59 PM, Christian Pedaschus wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:51:58 -0400 Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: On 12/06/14 11:43 PM, Christian Pedaschus wrote: wouldn't it be a feature? less warts, less bugs, less features, less compatible, but secure? What good is having a brand new from scratch API when almost nothing uses it? There are thousands of apps / libraries using OpenSSL. Are YOU going to go to each and every project and write SSL code for each respective project to add support for this from scratch API? One could have said the same about OpenSSH... or not? That doesn't even make any sense. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: who develops NIC drivers?
On 06/05/14 7:52 AM, Isak Lyberth wrote: I am thinking Intel ET Quadport gigabit server cards What about them? You need to be more forthcoming with the details and what it is that you're after. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: question about pppoe(4) and IPv6
On 02/05/14 10:24 AM, Peter J. Philipp wrote: On 05/02/14 16:13, Stefan Sperling wrote: OpenBSD doesn't support IPv6 autoconf on routers (i.e if forwarding is enabled). Some ISPs have started using autoconf to assign a global prefix for use on the WAN link. This violates early IPv6 RFCs which said that a router cannot do autoconf. There is a newer RFC which clears this up but OpenBSD doesn't support it yet: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6204 However, using a global prefix on your WAN link is usually not a hard requirement since link-local addresses are sufficient for this. Try setting a default route that points to pppoe0: !/sbin/route add -inet6 default -ifp pppoe0 fe80:: Your router should now be able to reach the IPv6 internet. Thanks Stefan for the good explanation and the setting! I'll try it out in a bit. Once this works you need to get your LAN connected, too. Did you get a static IPv6 prefix from your ISP for your LAN? Unfortunately it's all dynamic. M-Net used to be a friend about static IP addresses (which allowed me a tunnel to sixxs before), but they have turned against giving out static, whether v4 or v6. If I remember right they assign a /64 for the link, and give out a /48 somehow which is dynamic too. You would need a DHCPv6-PD capable DHCPv6 client such as wide-dhcpv6. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: xbmc
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 12:08:23PM +0200, St?phane Guedon wrote: Hello Is there anybody who has successfully set up xbmc on openbsd. I do not see any official port in the port tree, but is there a non official ? I had started and had something sorta running but without sound. It required some work on OpenBSD and a sound backend and now that I have looked at it again it failed to build elsewhere and not sure why. For some reason the build infrastructure is confused and thinks my system is Windows and it is tripping over a header in the DVD code. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OpenSSL heartbleed ?
On 08/04/14 6:53 PM, consultor wrote: On 04/08/2014 10:31 AM, Ted Unangst wrote: On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:19, Jack Woehr wrote: http://www.itnews.com.au/News/382068,serious-openssl-bug-renders-websites-wide-open.aspx accurate w/r/t 5.3? 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 are all affected. only 5.2 and earlier are not. Hello Ted, are you saying that 5.5 is going to go out affected on May? Yes, it is way too late to do anything about it now. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OpenBSD users web page updates
On 31/03/14 1:34 PM, Craig R. Skinner wrote: A few updates for the page: http://www.OpenBSD.org/users.html#isp * Fix broken Swebase link. * Add Devio.us * Add Grex * Add Polar Home It looks like Reverse.Net should be removed. Their website makes it pretty clear they don't run OpenBSD anymore. IMO the same thing should be done for any other entries where it is known or can be determined that a particular listed user isn't using OpenBSD anymore. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: USB Ethernet ASIX AX88179 not attaching to axen
On 27/03/14 3:40 AM, Remi Locherer wrote: I tried an Edimax USB Ethernet adapter on my -current system. It attaches as ugen1 but not as axen0: ugen1 at uhub3 port 2 ASIX Elec. Corp. AX88179 rev 2.10/1.00 addr 3 According to axen(4) this device should be supported. But config does not find axen. Is this becaus usb is handled differently or is the driver not enabled yet? It is not enabled in the regular kernel builds yet. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: make release fault at OpenBSD 5.5
On 04/03/14 5:24 PM, Theron ZORBAS wrote:
Hi,
I've just checked out from openbsd official cvs with -rOPENBSD_5_5 tag.
Then followed procedure from faq5/building from source.
It failed after make
release command; here is the output:
[..]
ld -Ttext
0x810001e0 -e start --warn-common -nopie -S -x -o bsd ${SYSTEM_HEAD}
vers.o ${OBJS}
textdatabss dec hex
4620925 2398568 520928
7540421 730ec5
cp
/usr/src/distrib/amd64/ramdisk_cd/../../../sys/arch/amd64/compile/RAMDISK_CD/
bsd bsd
cc -o rdsetroot
/usr/src/distrib/amd64/ramdisk_cd/../../common/elfrdsetroot.c
/usr/src/distrib/amd64/ramdisk_cd/../../common/elf32.c
/usr/src/distrib/amd64/ramdisk_cd/../../common/elf64.c
cp bsd bsd.rd
/usr/src/distrib/amd64/ramdisk_cd/obj/rdsetroot bsd.rd mr.fs
cp bsd.rd
bsd.strip
strip bsd.strip
strip -R .comment bsd.strip
gzip -c9n bsd.strip
bsd.gz
dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/tmp/image.17536 bs=512 count=6976
6976+0
records in
6976+0 records out
3571712 bytes transferred in 0.120 secs
(29725623 bytes/sec)
vnconfig -v -c vnd0 /var/tmp/image.17536
vnd0: 3571712
bytes on /var/tmp/image.17536
fdisk -yi -l 6976 -f /usr/dest/usr/mdec/mbr vnd0
Warning CHS values out of bounds only saving LBA values
Writing MBR at offset
0.
disklabel -w vnd0 mini34
disklabel: unknown disk type: mini34
*** Error 1
in /usr/src/distrib/amd64/ramdisk_cd (../common/Makefile.inc:35
'miniroot55.fs')
*** Error 1 in /usr/src/distrib/amd64 (bsd.subdir.mk:48
'all')
*** Error 1 in /usr/src/distrib (bsd.subdir.mk:48 'all')
*** Error 1
in /usr/src/etc (Makefile:325 'distrib')
Any comment?
Make sure /etc/disktab is up to date.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Re: radeondrm errors (amd64) - Hoping bad things won't really happen
On 01/03/14 10:41 AM, Scott Vanderbilt wrote: On 3/1/2014 12:06 AM, Remco wrote: I just upgraded a machine from source today. Using snapshots might be a safer bet, unless you have good reason to use sources instead. Thank you for your reply. I had to do a source update as this host is at remote co-location facility. I don't know where you're getting this idea from that you have to do a source update, but you do not. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Xorg: Segmentation fault at address 0x28 w/ Intel HD Graphics 4600
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:20:46PM -0500, Kenneth Westerback wrote: On 10 February 2014 13:11, RD Thrush openbsd-m...@thrush.com wrote: With a somewhat recent i7 desktop, using startx, X seems to run ok; however, at 1024x768 rather than the expected 1920x1200 resolution. ctl-alt-keypad+ or - have no effect on resolution. ctl-alt-backspace correctly reverts to text mode. I then tried Xorg -configure to look for hints to improve resolution; however, that resulted in a segfault almost immediately. I'm pretty sure vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel HD Graphics 4600 rev 0x06 is not supported in the sense of working as opposed to being recognized. i.e. 1024x768 is likely as good as it gets until support is added. Even 4400 is problematic at the moment. But I'm willing to be corrected by people more in the know. :-) Ken 4400 works fine for me. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OpenBSD packages extremely outdated?
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 08:35:41PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 07:17:41PM +, openda...@hushmail.com wrote: Hello, Are OpenBSD's packages extremely outdated? What would you say to this guy? At least with Linux I don't have to wait 6 hours for all my software to finish compiling. Think about all the trees that are unnecessarily cut down because of all that compiling. [...snip...] OpenBSD only has a small number of precompiled packages, and usually extremely outdated. If you want to get anything useful you have to compile ports. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7196494 Thanks! I would tell him: pkg_add gnome = on -current (soon to be 5.5) you end up with the same GNOME version (and assorted dependencies) as with the latest Fedora. We have the latest version of gnome, cups, gnutls, libgcrypt, . We have KMS with state of the art acceleration on Intel and ATI. And I don't understand why this guy spends hours compiling shits. This is not gentoo but OpenBSD, we use binary packages. We have around 7750 packages on amd64, and unlike Linux distros we do not split packages between -devel, -doc and stuffs -- so for a fair comparison you should dounble of even triple this number. If he thinks we are outdated, point him to: http://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/ It is the usual FUD, People have *no* idea what OpenBSD is nor how it works nor what is ships. Their mind is stuck in the 90's when they read the only thing they ever read about BSD OSes. People are parrots, they don't make up their own mind because it actually demands some effort; so they just repeat whatever shit sounded clever in someone else's mouth. Oh and by the way, most big Linux shops I know and/or worked for also used to compiled a big sets of packages for obvious (and sometime not-so-obvious) reasons. The world is full of people with mental issues and all too often people do things for the dumbest reasons. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Upgrade path from 4.1?
On 07/02/14 8:46 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: On 07/02/14 01:54, Chris Cappuccio wrote: This is probably the time where most people would recommend against that since it is essentially a complete reinstall of all items to upgrade from pre-5.5 to 5.5 due to time_t ABI change. Chris Sorry but isn't the ABI time_t change http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20130813 included in 5.4? No, the time_t changes went in after the tree unlocked from the 5.4 release cycle. Or am I confused cause I run -current almost everywhere? What is this reinstall for 5.5 that all you people are talking about? If we're talking about the same thing then no reinstall is needed... Having to replace all binaries and remove all only binaries since there is no backwards compatibility is close enough to a reinstall. It is not literally a reinstall but its enough work that you don't want to do that very often. For a lot of people it'll also require being physically in front of a system to do an upgrade unlike most previous releases. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Intermittent stops in network traffic with urtw interface
On 06/02/14 9:25 AM, Alexey Suslikov wrote: Brian Curran brian at brianpcurran.com writes: when it stops passing traffic, does issuing ifconfig urtw0 scan help? I test this just now and it seemed to help, although I only started seeing ping replies about 10 seconds after issuing the scan. There is a similar small delay, though usually not as long, when bringing the interface down then up. Also maybe of note is that the status of the interface as reported by ifconfig remains active when it is not receiving any traffic. I have urtwn(4) which also experience intermittent stops with some Access Points (not all). Looks like it is common problem for urtw(4) and urtwn(4). and rsu(4). -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Upgrade path from 4.1?
On 06/02/14 12:45 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote: On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Chris Cappuccio wrote: I don't see why everyone recommends install one version at a time. It's not a recommendation, it is reality. Each upgrade is based on the previuos version - skipping versions is not supported. There is a difference between supported and supported. What Chris said is true. Its the difference between people blindly following how-to's and actually understanding what they're doing and this is not very complex at all. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: The unknown in i386-unknown-openbsd5.4
On 02/02/14 1:50 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: On Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:18:06 + (UTC) na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote: Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote: i386-donatetoopenbsdfoundationtoday-openbsd5.4? or i386-bikeshed-openbsd. What is the string equivalent of goatse or tubgirl? Maybe something simple that distinguishes compilers: i386-gcc-openbsd5.4 i386-clang-openbsd5.4 Or something more elaborate signifies the origin: Locally compiled: i386-srcbld-openbsd5.4 i386-portbld-openbsd5.4 Upstream binary releases: i386-dist-openbsd5.4 i386-package-openbsd5.4 Enough is enough. Just drop it. Of course people are going to start making fun of this non issue. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: The unknown in i386-unknown-openbsd5.4
On 01/02/14 11:18 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 22:06:47 -0500 Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote: Well, that's true. If the admin cares about the value in X-Mailer, the admin should configure a better value. Patching the various occurrences of this string might be more cumbersome than changing the way it's generated and used throughout the system, but I get your gist. The way it is generated can be changed very easily and contrary to the previous comment it doesn't break all autoconf scripts that use the triplet. But there is no purpose for doing so. OMG something I don't understand, must... fiddle... with. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4
On 04/12/13 4:44 PM, Vadim Zhukov wrote: 2013/12/5 Peter Fraser p...@thinkage.ca: samba required the e2fsprogs package. The problem occurs when trying to use samba's net command. The net command requires libuuid. It was not easy to find where libuuid was located. pkg_locate libuuid.so - no? Even if that tool was installed that would not locate anything if the package in question is not already installed, right? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4
On 04/12/13 5:23 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: pkg_locate libuuid.so - no? Even if that tool was installed that would not locate anything if the package in question is not already installed, right? Wrong. How does it find the file then? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4
On 04/12/13 5:37 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: On 04/12/13 5:23 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: ... Even if that tool was installed that would not locate anything if the package in question is not already installed, right? Wrong. How does it find the file then? As documented on the manpage, using tiny French elves cloned from espie@ That's about it. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: User land notification uppon pppoe(4) changes
On 24/11/13 2:40 PM, David Keller wrote: Hello, *** * My setup Say I have a router using pppoe to connect to internet. It gets a different ip address from the ISP every day. From this router I want to create a gif tunnel to a static-ip host. *** * My problem How can I ensure the src outer address of the gif interface sticks to the pppoe dynamic-ip ? *** * My solution I was thinking about updating the gif interface when the pppoe link changes its IP using a userland daemon which monitors the interface and executes user scripts. *** * Your feeling 1) Is this a good idea ? 2) Does this daemon already exist ? 2.1) If I write it, would you like me to share it ? Take a look at ifstated(8). -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Patch to remove adult content from spamd(8) man page
On 21/11/13 2:15 PM, za...@gmx.com wrote: On 2013-11-21 20:04, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:02:06PM +0100, za...@gmx.com wrote: Different people have different concepts of morality. I believe it would be better to remove anything that is controversial, for whatever reason -- even if in *my* concept of morality there was nothing wrong with it. I feel offended by those who feel offended about some man page. Maybe we should remove them as they are causing controversy ? A reasonable person is the one who takes into consideration others, among other things. Yes, you can take that defying attitude, but it does not seem very constructive in the context of a community, such as the OpenBSD community, where people are trying to achieve something useful. Bickering about silly things is not constructive at all. The best guideline with regard to similar matters is that of AVOIDING bike shedding issues. This is a useless discussion about silly things and is not constructive at all. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: OpenBSD 5.4 VMXNET3 not recognized
On 20/11/13 3:11 PM, Dan Shechter wrote: Hi All, Running OpenBSD in VMWare workstation 10. OpenBSD 5.4 amd64 do not recognize VMXNET3, but it does recognize VMXNET: VMware Virtual VMXNET3 rev 0x01 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 not configured Am I doing something wrong? Yes, your expectation. 5.4 does not support VMXNET3. -current does. There was a mistake with 54.html/the release announcement. Thanks, Dan OpenBSD 5.4 (GENERIC.MP) #41: Tue Jul 30 15:30:02 MDT 2013 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 251592704 (239MB) avail mem = 237289472 (226MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xe0010 (364 entries) bios0: vendor Phoenix Technologies LTD version 6.00 date 07/31/2013 bios0: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S1 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP BOOT APIC MCFG SRAT HPET WAET acpi0: wakeup devices PCI0(S3) USB_(S1) P2P0(S3) S1F0(S3) S2F0(S3) S3F0(S3) S4F0(S3) S5F0(S3) S6F0(S3) S7F0(S3) S8F0(S3) S9F0(S3) S10F(S3) S11F(S3) S12F(S3) S13F(S3) [...] acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700MQ CPU @ 2.40GHz, 2394.13 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,SSE3,PCLMUL,SSSE3,CX16,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,MOVBE,POPCNT,AES,NXE,LONG,LAHF,PERF,ITSC cpu0: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0 cpu0: apic clock running at 65MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700MQ CPU @ 2.40GHz, 2393.95 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,SSE3,PCLMUL,SSSE3,CX16,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,MOVBE,POPCNT,AES,NXE,LONG,LAHF,PERF,ITSC cpu1: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu1: smt 0, core 0, package 2 ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 11, 24 pins acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-127 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpicpu0 at acpi0 acpicpu1 at acpi0 acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT1 not present acpibat1 at acpi0: BAT2 not present acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit online acpibtn0 at acpi0: SLPB acpibtn1 at acpi0: LID_ vmt0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82443BX AGP rev 0x01 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel 82443BX AGP rev 0x01 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 pcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 Intel 82371AB PIIX4 ISA rev 0x08 pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 Intel 82371AB IDE rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility pciide0: channel 0 disabled (no drives) atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: NECVMWar, VMware IDE CDR10, 1.00 ATAPI 5/cdrom removable cd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2 piixpm0 at pci0 dev 7 function 3 Intel 82371AB Power rev 0x08: SMBus disabled VMware Virtual Machine Interface rev 0x10 at pci0 dev 7 function 7 not configured vga1 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 VMware Virtual SVGA II rev 0x00 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) mpi0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 Symbios Logic 53c1030 rev 0x01: apic 2 int 17 scsibus1 at mpi0: 16 targets, initiator 7 sd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: VMware,, VMware Virtual S, 1.0 SCSI2 0/direct fixed sd0: 256000MB, 512 bytes/sector, 524288000 sectors mpi0: target 0 Sync at 160MHz width 16bit offset 127 QAS 1 DT 1 IU 1 ppb1 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 VMware Virtual rev 0x02 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 uhci0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82371AB USB rev 0x00: apic 2 int 18 eap0 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 Ensoniq AudioPCI97 rev 0x02: apic 2 int 19 ac97: codec id 0x43525913 (Cirrus Logic CS4297A rev 3) audio0 at eap0 midi0 at eap0: AudioPCI MIDI UART vic0 at pci2 dev 3 function 0 VMware Virtual NIC rev 0x10: apic 2 int 17, address 00:50:56:2a:1e:d8 usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 Intel UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1 ppb2 at pci0 dev 21 function 0 VMware Virtual PCIE-PCIE rev 0x01 pci3 at ppb2 bus 3 VMware Virtual VMXNET3 rev 0x01 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 not configured ppb3 at pci0 dev 21 function 1 VMware Virtual PCIE-PCIE rev 0x01 pci4 at ppb3 bus 4 ppb4 at pci0 dev 21 function 2 VMware Virtual PCIE-PCIE rev 0x01 pci5 at ppb4 bus 5 ppb5 at pci0 dev 21 function 3 VMware Virtual PCIE-PCIE rev 0x01 pci6 at ppb5 bus 6 ppb6 at pci0 dev 21 function 4 VMware Virtual PCIE-PCIE rev 0x01 pci7 at ppb6 bus 7 ppb7 at pci0 dev 21 function 5 VMware Virtual PCIE-PCIE rev 0x01 pci8 at ppb7 bus 8 ppb8 at pci0 dev 21 function 6 VMware Virtual PCIE-PCIE rev 0x01 pci9 at ppb8 bus 9 ppb9 at pci0 dev 21 function 7 VMware Virtual PCIE-PCIE rev 0x01 pci10 at ppb9 bus 10 ppb10 at pci0 dev 22 function 0 VMware Virtual PCIE-PCIE rev 0x01 pci11 at ppb10 bus 11 ppb11 at pci0 dev 22 function 1 VMware Virtual PCIE-PCIE rev 0x01 pci12 at
Re: Problem with dhcp requests on --current of Nov 2-4
On 04/11/13 6:22 PM, STeve Andre' wrote: Sometime between Oct 18th and now I've lost the ability to do a dhcp request at boot time. Dropping back to the Oct 18 kernel fixes things so I don't have hardware problems. When I attempt to do a dhclient em0 I get DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPACK from 192.168.1.1 (00:1a:70:f8:07:38) and thats it. This is a thinkpad W500 running -current oct 18th that works, Nov 2-today kernels that do not work. Has anyone else seen this? Yes.. as Tobias mentioned, make sure your kernel and userland are in sync. From current.html.. 2013/10/31 - new routing message version -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: nvidia driver what do you recommend
On 02/11/13 11:57 AM, Gilles Cafedjian wrote: Hello I think vesa driver allow only built-in resolution of your bios. I saw in my Xorg.0.log: ... (II) VESA(0): Not using mode 1440x900_60.00 (no mode of this name) ... (--) VESA(0): Virtual size is 1024x768 (pitch 1024) (**) VESA(0): *Built-in mode 1024x768 (**) VESA(0): *Built-in mode 800x600 (**) VESA(0): *Built-in mode 640x480 (==) VESA(0): DPI set to (96, 96) (II) VESA(0): Attempting to use 60Hz refresh for mode 1024x768 (118) ... ... I guess I'm stuck with 1024x768 too :( Correct, that's one of many reasons to want to have a port of the Nouveau driver. Using the VESA driver is pretty awful. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Looking for a laptop in the Toronto area
Hi, I added an entry to want.html as I am looking for a laptop to replace the laptop I have at the moment which has some really bad heat related issues and I have been hobbling along with it for awhile now. I am in the Toronto area. I thought I would post to misc@ for some greater exposure. Is there anyone that would be able to help me out? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Sorry OpenBSD people, been a bit busy
On 07/10/13 9:57 PM, noah pugsley wrote: Slander aside, pretty cool news. I do have one stupid question though, what does the 'yy' in yycix stand for? It is not YY it is YYC. It is an airport code. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: pure_ftpd other option(style) not work
On 23/09/13 11:07 PM, Fung wrote: in current snapshots install pure_ftpd default /etc/rc.d/pure_ftpd is --- #!/bin/sh # # $OpenBSD: pure_ftpd.rc,v 1.1 2011/04/25 09:26:47 sthen Exp $ daemon=/usr/local/sbin/pure-ftpd daemon_flags=-A -B -H -u1000 . /etc/rc.d/rc.subr pexp=pure-ftpd: -pure-ftpd \(SERVER\) rc_reload=NO rc_cmd $1 -- # /etc/rc.d/pure_ftpd start # ps -auwx | grep ftpd root 8530 0.0 0.0 852 1264 ?? Is10:44AM0:00.00 pure-ftpd: -pure-ftpd (SERVER) (pure-ftpd) now user login work if add other flags like -o, for example , change /etc/rc.d/pure_ftpd -daemon_flags=-A -B -H -u1000 +daemon_flags=-o -A -B -H -u1000 the daemon will start but nobody can login! # pkill ftpd # /etc/rc.d/pure_ftpd start pure_ftpd(ok) # ps -auwx | grep ftpd root 15587 0.0 0.0 676 964 ?? Is10:48AM0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/pure-ftpd -o -A -B -H -u1000 # ftp localhost Trying 127.0.0.1... ftp: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused Trying ::1... ftp: connect: Connection refused ftp BTW, start pure-ftpd without rc.d script not work too # pkill ftpd # /usr/local/sbin/pure-ftpd -A -B -H -u1000 -o # ftp localhost Trying 127.0.0.1... ftp: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused Trying ::1... ftp: connect: Connection refused ftp # sysctl kern.version kern.version=OpenBSD 5.4-current (GENERIC) #55: Tue Sep 17 08:29:11 MDT 2013 t...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC # pkg_info | grep pure pure-ftpd-1.0.36p2-virtual_chroot small, easy to set up, fast and very secure FTP server The pure-ftpd package works fine out of the box with either the rc.d script or manually running the equivalent binary and command line parameters. There is something you have done on your system to cause it to not work. Does fstat show the sockets created by pure-ftpd once it has been started up? Are you running a modified PF rule set? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: no audio with aucat
On 21/09/13 12:04 AM, Johan Huldtgren wrote: This is a virtual machine, isn't it? AFAICS, virtual machines can't do full duplex, while eap(4) cards claim they are full-duplex. Correct, it's a virtual machine. Could you add -mplay to the sndiod_flags variable in /etc/rc.conf.local (or whatever you use) and see how this works? that works too, so seems options are either using the -mplay flag or disabling sndiod. Use -mplay for sndiod. sndiod should not be disabled. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: This 48 core box...
On 17/09/13 2:12 PM, Nick Holland wrote: On 09/17/2013 01:41 PM, Andy wrote: On Tue 17 Sep 2013 18:09:15 BST, Michael Chen wrote: I'm considering bidding on this 48-core box: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Supermicro-A-Server-1042G-TF-1U-H8QG6-4-CPUS-48-cores-2-2Ghz-128GB-RAM-/151119828428?pt=COMP_EN_Servershash=item232f7195cc Does anyone have experience with it and can I use all the cores? Thanks! We use loads of Supermicro from Transtec and they work great. This is second hand though.. never used one of those machines, but I did play with a mighty machine recently. 1.5TB RAM, 4x8 HT'd cores (that's 64 sorta-cores...). Unfortunately, it seemed that only 512G of RAM was usable, more than that caused it to panic early in the boot process. So, I used boot(8) to restrict memory that the kernel saw. CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:src Changes by: a...@cvs.openbsd.org2004/07/19 09:09:06 Modified files: sys/arch/amd64/amd64: cpu.c machdep.c mptramp.S pmap.c sys/arch/amd64/include: pmap.h Log message: Implement __HAVE_PMAP_DIRECT on amd64 using large pages. At this moment it's limited to 512GB (one L4 page table entry) physical memory. Only used carefully at this moment, but more improvements are in the pipeline. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)
On 13/09/13 1:13 PM, Jim MacKenzie wrote: -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of David Coppa Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 10:14 AM To: Jim MacKenzie Cc: misc Subject: Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3) I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant. I'm not sure if it matters here, but the VAX port of OpenBSD still uses GCC 2.95. No more. My 5.3 VAXstation 4000/60 system still uses 2.95. Yes, still have a VAX. Maybe this is changing in 5.4. Yes, 5.3 is old ;) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Modern C++ Compiler for OpenBSD
On 10/09/13 6:10 PM, Gregor Best wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:40:19PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: [...] Does anyone have a C++ compiler recommendation for OpenBSD? [...] What about GCC? Clang++'s C++11 support is spotty at best, at least it was the last time I tried. Clang's C++11 support doesn't work properly because it isn't using the proper release of libstdc++. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Modern C++ Compiler for OpenBSD
On 10/09/13 6:20 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Gregor Best g...@ring0.de wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:40:19PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: [...] Does anyone have a C++ compiler recommendation for OpenBSD? [...] What about GCC? Clang++'s C++11 support is spotty at best, at least it was the last time I tried. Thanks Gregor. I don't believe GCC 4.2.1 supports C++11x features, but I could be wrong. I also tried tracking down Clang and Comeau's support for OpenBSD, but I could not find something stated it in clear terms (lots of mailing list questions). At this point, it looks like the platofrm is not supported. I think that leaves PCC, which is a C99 compiler (according to http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/). Do you not use ports / packages? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: 10GbE (Intel X540) performance on OpenBSD 5.3
- Original message - As far as I know X540-T2 out on the market don't do PCI 3.0. Cards I have are PCI 2.1, this means (if I remember my calculations right) this 10G card is caped by PCI bus - 6G max. Basically Intel sells 10G which is caped up to 6G. and this is for the single port. If those ports are both in use, then you'll have to divide this number with 2(avrg. and not precise number). You're mentioning numbers that were relevant for PCI-X not PCIe. A single PCIe 1 x8 slot is fine for a single port 10Gb adapter. A PCIe 2 x8 slot is required for a dual port 10Gb adapter. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Fuse on OpenBSD
On 03/07/13 11:07 PM, openda...@hushmail.com wrote: Why do we need FUSE anyway? To be able to utilize FUSE based filesystems. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: IPv6, automatic configuration and nameservers
On 23/06/13 3:59 PM, Denis Fondras wrote: Hi all, Le 22/06/2013 03:28, Brad Smith a écrit : On 13/06/13 7:53 AM, Gregor Best wrote: Hi list, recently, I've been playing around a bit with IPv6, and IPv6-only networks. While doing that, I have not found an automated way to add nameservers announced via router advertisements. dhclient does that for IPv4 but the rtsol in OpenBSD doesn't have FreeBSD's -R option for adding recursive nameservers (and porting that without also porting resolvconf seems to be less than trivial). Is there a canonical solution with only the things in base or should I just use something from ports? And what's the port people use for that? As you have already noticed our rtsold does not have support for RFC 6106 (yet). The only option you have at the moment is using a DHCPv6 client such as net/isc-dhcp. Stephane Sezer developped a patch more than 2 years ago : http://openbsd.7691.n7.nabble.com/RFC6106-RDNSS-and-DNSSL-options-support-for-rtadvd-8-td162760.html It seems it hasn't been merged but it worked nicely back then. Denis That is for rtadvd, which has been integrated, not rtsold. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: IPv6, automatic configuration and nameservers
On 13/06/13 7:53 AM, Gregor Best wrote: Hi list, recently, I've been playing around a bit with IPv6, and IPv6-only networks. While doing that, I have not found an automated way to add nameservers announced via router advertisements. dhclient does that for IPv4 but the rtsol in OpenBSD doesn't have FreeBSD's -R option for adding recursive nameservers (and porting that without also porting resolvconf seems to be less than trivial). Is there a canonical solution with only the things in base or should I just use something from ports? And what's the port people use for that? As you have already noticed our rtsold does not have support for RFC 6106 (yet). The only option you have at the moment is using a DHCPv6 client such as net/isc-dhcp. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Atom D2550 (cedarview) working now with kms?
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 01:10:25PM +1100, Brett Mahar wrote: On 03/24/13 08:00, Ted Unangst wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 00:39, Brett Mahar wrote: Hi, Now that the KMS stuff has arrived (thanks for that!), I'm looking at this device from Shuttle http://axcco.com/xs35v3.html. It has an Atom D2550 with Intel GMA 3650 Graphic engine, should it work as well as the Pineview series Atoms do in displaying Xvideo output? No. Only video with D/Nxxx (three digit) Atoms may work, if it's the regular onboard chipset intel video. A lot of them are nvidia ion, which is bad news too, obviously. 4 digit models are crazy powervr video. Thanks Ted and Jonathan, I would have wasted $200 without that info! Looks like the ancient core2duo will be playing movies for a while longer. The new ValleyView Atom coming out in a few months will finally replace the PowerVR cores being used in the past with the platform with a Gen7 (Ivy Bridge) core. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: resize disklabel partitions and ffs filesystems
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:46:34PM +1100, John Tate wrote: I had a problem building something in ports ports with a default 2.0gb /usr. I tried moving ports to /home/usr/ports to /usr/ports but I get... Fatal: /usr/ports is a symlink. Please set to the real directory Don't try to make a symlink. Create /etc/mk.conf and add to that file `PORTSDIR=/home/usr/ports'. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: WebRTC, google and firefox
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:10:45PM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 06:53:43PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: . It'll be a lot easier to have an HTML5 compliant browser with support for WebRTC all over the place then it will be to get some of these services using proprietary protocols, plugins, and host apps to be ported all over the place. I'm not sure it's all that easy. Effectively, HTML5 turns out being equal to OOXML and flash in terms of reimplementation possibility: albeit quite trivial to reimplement in terms of specs availability, the task is too huge to undertake for a community project. Which community is this relevant to? A niche browser literally no one uses? The relevant rendering engines that count already have support and its much easier to reimplment WebRTC over Flash. WebRTC is fully open spec and has already been done. Flash is not and has not been done. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: WebRTC, google and firefox
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:33:04PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:10:45PM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 06:53:43PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: . It'll be a lot easier to have an HTML5 compliant browser with support for WebRTC all over the place then it will be to get some of these services using proprietary protocols, plugins, and host apps to be ported all over the place. I'm not sure it's all that easy. Effectively, HTML5 turns out being equal to OOXML and flash in terms of reimplementation possibility: albeit quite trivial to reimplement in terms of specs availability, the task is too huge to undertake for a community project. Which community is this relevant to? A niche browser literally no one uses? The relevant rendering engines that count already have support and its much easier to reimplment WebRTC over Flash. WebRTC is fully open spec and has already been done. Flash is not and has not been done. not to give the impression that I care much about flash (i do not). however, i was under the impression adobe had opened the specifications[1] to its flash technology. A lot of it is but not everything that is required for an open source implementation has been provided. HTML5 is still the better option anyway even if there was enough interest to bother going the full mile with an open source Flash implementation. regardless, i find it very ironic how something that was initially designed to be a thin-client (i.e., the web-browser) has grown to the That's your opinion. I've never thought of a browser as needing to be thin. It is thin and useless or rely upon plugins and having some OS's with plugins and lots without. HTML5 builds infrastructure to remove the necessity for plugins and allowing the same functionality everywhere. monster it is. as pointed out by someone else (sorry didn't keep track of messages or even threads that closely, since it isn't really a topic of choice atm) it is amazing how much software, say, firefox requires. e.g., pulling in dbus. someone said (again I forget who) DBus is small and a very common dependency on systems anyway. that dbus is small ... still it is crap i don't want on my system regardless of how small it may be. but hey, i digress ... the world has bigger problems than what is being hashed out here. Can you rant about anything more irrelevant? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: A slight twist on the OpenBSD laptop question
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 12:10:18PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote: i don't think it's as drastic as that if you buy a Clarkdale cpu you're good to go these came out ~2010, they are still modern The issue isn't the CPU but the GPU and the GPUs in question come with Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge based systems and anything newer. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: WebRTC, google and firefox
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:25:31PM +0100, Pau wrote: Hi, I have been searching but could not find information in this respect. I have 5.2 installed on a thinkpad x220s and, while ekiga seems to work fine, I have not found a way to make empathy or pidgin work with a gtalk account. The Pidgin port doesn't have VV support and last time I looked at this it didn't seem to work too well or at all and seemed to be issues with GStreamer and/or other components Pidgin relies upon for Jingle support. Should not WebRTC, Google Hangout, work in firefox? HTML5 should work everywhere I thought? HTML5 entails a variety of different standards and support for those standards in each respective browser. FF and Chromium on OpenBSD still do not have WebRTC support. You're making an assumption which is wrong. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: WebRTC, google and firefox
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:46:04PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:25:31PM +0100, Pau wrote: Hi, I have been searching but could not find information in this respect. I have 5.2 installed on a thinkpad x220s and, while ekiga seems to work fine, I have not found a way to make empathy or pidgin work with a gtalk account. The Pidgin port doesn't have VV support and last time I looked at this it didn't seem to work too well or at all and seemed to be issues with GStreamer and/or other components Pidgin relies upon for Jingle support. Should not WebRTC, Google Hangout, work in firefox? HTML5 should work everywhere I thought? HTML5 entails a variety of different standards and support for those standards in each respective browser. FF and Chromium on OpenBSD still do not have WebRTC support. You're making an assumption which is wrong. Another thing I forgot to mention. WebRTC is not a part of HTML5 yet. It is a work in progress spec and implementations that could potentially be a part of HTML5. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: WebRTC, google and firefox
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:47:47PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:46:04PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:25:31PM +0100, Pau wrote: Hi, I have been searching but could not find information in this respect. I have 5.2 installed on a thinkpad x220s and, while ekiga seems to work fine, I have not found a way to make empathy or pidgin work with a gtalk account. The Pidgin port doesn't have VV support and last time I looked at this it didn't seem to work too well or at all and seemed to be issues with GStreamer and/or other components Pidgin relies upon for Jingle support. Should not WebRTC, Google Hangout, work in firefox? HTML5 should work everywhere I thought? HTML5 entails a variety of different standards and support for those standards in each respective browser. FF and Chromium on OpenBSD still do not have WebRTC support. You're making an assumption which is wrong. Another thing I forgot to mention. WebRTC is not a part of HTML5 yet. It is a work in progress spec and implementations that could potentially be a part of HTML5. and so the web-browser becomes the OS. I'd rather have WebRTC and what is possible via standardized mecnanisms over Skype, plugins for GTalk, and various other services based on closed apps limited to certain major OS's. It'll be a lot easier to have an HTML5 compliant browser with support for WebRTC all over the place then it will be to get some of these services using proprietary protocols, plugins, and host apps to be ported all over the place. A lot of the focus of HTML5 is to design standardized means of doing what all too often required external plugins and all too often are limited to Windows and maybe OS X at best. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: A slight twist on the OpenBSD laptop question
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:36:58AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:30:54PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: I was about to buy two thinkpads which are often suggested when the OpenBSD laptop question is raised but the 93 in stock have disappeared since saturday, aaargh. There are still core2duos and lesser spec'd systems available which has prompted me to ask the question I had pondered on. Does anyone know what the latest full screen (! widescreen) AMD laptops would be that have excellent compatibility with OpenBSD or if 2Ghz is the highest spec non core 2 duo and non widescreen reliable laptop suitable for OpenBSD available? If no idea which kind of graphics card the machine that you're considering has. This is probably the key point. Stay away from nVidia mobile chipsets and from recent AMD integated graphics. and recent Intel graphics. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: A slight twist on the OpenBSD laptop question
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:00:01PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:36:58AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:30:54PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: I was about to buy two thinkpads which are often suggested when the OpenBSD laptop question is raised but the 93 in stock have disappeared since saturday, aaargh. There are still core2duos and lesser spec'd systems available which has prompted me to ask the question I had pondered on. Does anyone know what the latest full screen (! widescreen) AMD laptops would be that have excellent compatibility with OpenBSD or if 2Ghz is the highest spec non core 2 duo and non widescreen reliable laptop suitable for OpenBSD available? If no idea which kind of graphics card the machine that you're considering has. This is probably the key point. Stay away from nVidia mobile chipsets and from recent AMD integated graphics. and recent Intel graphics. so what's left to chose from? :) That's the whole point. You're screwed running anything modern (so far). -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: automake 1.11.5: never mind
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:36:00PM -0500, Alan Corey wrote: Changing my .cshrc to define AUTOMAKE_VERSION 1.11 instead of 1.11.5 and rebooting cured the problem. Not sure why since I don't have 1.11.0 installed. I have 1.10.3p6, 1.11.5p1, 1.9.6p10. Oh well. End of story for now. The version specified by the variable only refers to the major version of each respective automake release. Look at the naming of the binaries for each automake release within their packages. Alan The distfile name is automake-1.11.5.tar.gz and pkg_info reports 1.11.5, but sqlports rejects it. In the ports tree there are 6 versions: d530# cd automake d530# ls 1.10 1.12 1.8 CVS Makefile.inc 1.11 1.4 1.9 Makefile Alan On 3/4/13, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:04:51AM -0500, Alan Corey wrote: I'm defining setenv AUTOMAKE_VERSION 1.11.5 In my .cshrc, I don't know why exactly. The value should be 1.11 not 1.11.5. -- Credit is the root of all evil. - AB1JX -- Credit is the root of all evil. - AB1JX -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: automake 1.11.5: never mind
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:04:51AM -0500, Alan Corey wrote: I'm defining setenv AUTOMAKE_VERSION 1.11.5 In my .cshrc, I don't know why exactly. The value should be 1.11 not 1.11.5. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Softraid 3TB Problems
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 07:25:18PM -0600, Brandon Tanner wrote: By the way, does softraid on amd64 support 4096 bytes per sector? No matter what the architecture is softraid to date does not support devices with anything other than 512 bytes/sector. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: ARP and npppd
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:03:44PM +0100, mxb wrote: I think this is on TODO-list. This is why npppd considered to be not ready and thus not linked to build. It is linked to the build and has been for 5 months. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: using snapshots to stay current - 5.3 snapshot question
- Original message - Hi For the last few months i've been following -current using snapshots. I see on the ftp mirrors that 5.3 is now there. This is probably a stupid question but is it the same process for upgrading to the 5.3 snapshot as it has been with the 5.2 snapshots? Is there anything extra/special that I need to read before I go ahead and do the upgrade? There is no change in the process you're already using. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: two equal filenames in one dir
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 05:20:14AM -0500, Jiri B wrote: Hello, I'm confused, how is it possible I have two files with same names in one dir? $ ls -li total 1245376 3611817 -rw-r--r-- 1 jirib jirib 168392755 Jan 14 23:35 Crostata_Alla_Fruta.mp4 3741698 -rw-r--r-- 1 jirib jirib 165519511 Mar 12 2010 Pizza Margherita-10115892.mp4 3611818 -rw-r--r-- 1 jirib jirib 165519511 Jan 14 23:35 Pizza_Margherita-10115892.mp4 3741699 -rw-r--r-- 1 jirib jirib 68932635 Jul 31 21:02 jablecny kolac-46705666.mp4 3611819 -rw-r--r-- 1 jirib jirib 68932635 Jan 14 23:35 jablecny_kolac-46705666.mp4 They do not appear to be the same to me. One set has an underscore and the other has a space. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: How do I compile 32-bit binaries on amd64 OpenBSD?
- Original message - Thanks Peter. I found that many autotools packaged programs out there expect newer gcc environments. I'd love to what programs these are. I haven't run into these many programs, only a very small few. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: How do I compile 32-bit binaries on amd64 OpenBSD?
- Original message - - Original message - Thanks Peter. I found that many autotools packaged programs out there expect newer gcc environments. I'd love to what programs these are. I haven't run into these many programs, only a very small few. love to know* -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: firefox crashes
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:43:36AM +0800, Salil Wadnerkar wrote: Hi, On my amd64 machine, firefox crashes regularly after some time. Here is the info about the crash: gdb /usr/local/bin/firefox firefox.core GNU gdb 6.3 This GDB was configured as amd64-unknown-openbsd5.2...(no debugging symbols found) ... Core was generated by `firefox'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. (gdb) where #0 0x0002053d4d4a in kill () at stdin:2 #1 0x000200cc6f12 in XRE_InstallX11ErrorHandler () from /usr/local/lib/firefox-18.0/libxul.so.37.0 #2 signal handler called #3 0x000202163fe9 in JS_DefineProfilingFunctions () from /usr/local/lib/firefox-18.0/libxul.so.37.0 #4 0x00020168a8d7 in non-virtual thunk to js::DirectWrapper::toWrapper() () from /usr/local/lib/firefox-18.0/libxul.so.37.0 #5 0x0002021607a6 in JS_DefineProfilingFunctions () from /usr/local/lib/firefox-18.0/libxul.so.37.0 #6 0x0002021099f0 in JS_DefineDebuggerObject () from /usr/local/lib/firefox-18.0/libxul.so.37.0 #7 0x000202163ecd in JS_DefineProfilingFunctions () from /usr/local/lib/firefox-18.0/libxul.so.37.0 This should be built with debug symbols and get a proper traceback, then file a bug report upstream with Mozilla. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: how to use cpu affinity from user space
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:25:04AM +0500, ??? wrote: Hello! I'm investigating how program should set cpu affinity, is there any examples ? (I didn't find any except the commit that adds cpu affinity thing, but there's no user space documentation, no utility, no man page). As far as I know of it isn't possible to do so. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: unable to build -current from 5.2 beta
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 03:43:22PM +0200, Ivo Chutkin wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to build -current from 5.2 beta from Jul 1 but getting
the following error:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:105: Error: no such instruction: `rdrand %rbx'
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC (line 89 of
/usr/share/mk/sys.mk).
I am getting the same error with GENERIC and GENERIC.MP
Is this know problem or I am doing something wrong?
Upgrade using a snapshot.
Dmesg bellow.
Thanks for the help,
Ivo
OpenBSD 5.2-beta (GENERIC.MP) #340: Sun Jul 1 23:18:37 MDT 2012
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 8560926720 (8164MB)
avail mem = 8310677504 (7925MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.7 @ 0xeb4c0 (56 entries)
bios0: vendor American Megatrends Inc. version 2.00 date 05/08/2012
bios0: Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
acpi0: sleep states S0 S1 S4 S5
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC FPDT MCFG PRAD HPET SSDT SPMI SSDT SSDT
SPCR EINJ ERST HEST BERT BGRT
acpi0: wakeup devices PS2K(S4) PS2M(S4) UAR1(S4) UAR2(S4) P0P1(S4)
USB1(S4) USB2(S4) USB3(S4) USB4(S4) USB5(S4) USB6(S4) USB7(S4)
PXSX(S4) RP01(S4) PXSX(S4) R
P02(S4) PXSX(S4) RP03(S4) PXSX(S4) RP04(S4) PXSX(S4) RP05(S4)
PXSX(S4) RP06(S4) PXSX(S4) RP07(S4) PXSX(S4) RP08(S4) PEGP(S4)
PEG0(S4) PEG1(S4) PEG2(S4) PEG3(S
4) GLAN(S4) EHC1(S4) EHC2(S4) HDEF(S4) PWRB(S4)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 V2 @ 3.10GHz, 3093.46 MHz
cpu0:
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,PCLMUL,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,
EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,POPCNT,AES,XSAVE,AVX,NXE,LONG,LAHF
cpu0: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
cpu0: apic clock running at 99MHz
cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 2 (application processor)
cpu1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 V2 @ 3.10GHz, 3092.97 MHz
cpu1:
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,PCLMUL,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,
EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,POPCNT,AES,XSAVE,AVX,NXE,LONG,LAHF
cpu1: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
cpu2 at mainbus0: apid 4 (application processor)
cpu2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 V2 @ 3.10GHz, 3092.97 MHz
cpu2:
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,PCLMUL,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,
EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,POPCNT,AES,XSAVE,AVX,NXE,LONG,LAHF
cpu2: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
cpu3 at mainbus0: apid 6 (application processor)
cpu3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 V2 @ 3.10GHz, 3092.97 MHz
cpu3:
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,PCLMUL,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,
EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,POPCNT,AES,XSAVE,AVX,NXE,LONG,LAHF
cpu3: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xf800, bus 0-63
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 3 (P0P1)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 1 (RP01)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP02)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP03)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP04)
acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 2 (RP05)
acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP06)
acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP07)
acpiprt9 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP08)
acpiprt10 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG0)
acpiprt11 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG1)
acpiprt12 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG2)
acpiprt13 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG3)
acpiec0 at acpi0: Failed to read resource settings
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, C1, PSS
acpicpu1 at acpi0: C3, C1, PSS
acpicpu2 at acpi0: C3, C1, PSS
acpicpu3 at acpi0: C3, C1, PSS
acpipwrres0 at acpi0: FN00
acpipwrres1 at acpi0: FN01
acpipwrres2 at acpi0: FN02
acpipwrres3 at acpi0: FN03
acpipwrres4 at acpi0: FN04
acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature is 106 degC
acpitz1 at acpi0: critical temperature is 106 degC
acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0 not present
acpibat1 at acpi0: BAT1 not present
acpibat2 at acpi0: BAT2 not present
acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB
acpibtn1 at acpi0: LID0
acpivideo0 at acpi0: GFX0
acpivout0 at acpivideo0: DD02
ipmi at mainbus0 not configured
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 3093 MHz: speeds: 3101, 3100, 3000, 2900,
2800, 2700, 2600, 2500, 2300, 2200, 2100, 2000, 1900, 1800, 1700,
1600 MHz
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 vendor Intel, unknown product
0x0158 rev 0x09
em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 Intel 82579LM rev 0x05: msi, address
00:25:90:77:64:19
ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel 6 Series USB rev 0x05: apic 2 int 16
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb0 at pci0 dev 28
Re: how to upgrade gcc 4.2.1 to gcc-4.7.1
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 03:57:48PM +0100, Janne Johansson wrote: 2013/1/17 WANG Siyuan wangsiyuanb...@gmail.com: Hi, I install gcc 4.7 on openbsd using pkg_add. after installation, I use 'gcc -v' to check, I found it is also gcc 4.2 ! how to upgrade gcc 4.2 to gcc 4.7 on openbsd? thank you! The non-system gcc ends up in /usr/local/bin Edit your PATH accordingly. And don't compile the base system with the non-system compiler. You don't need to edit your PATH. The GCC 4.7 binaries are installed as egcc / eg++. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: named error from /var/named/etc/root.hint
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:32:57AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: Hi I recently upgraded my system to the Dec 21 snapshot, will be updating again to the Jan 09 snapshot; but, I noticed an error message in /var/log/messages yesterday when I rebooted my machine: Jan 13 21:16:43 kontrol named[23666]: checkhints: d.root-servers.net/A (199.7.91.13) missing from hints Jan 13 21:16:43 kontrol named[23666]: checkhints: d.root-servers.net/A (128.8.10.90) extra record in hints I managed to fix it by downloading a new file from ftp://ftp.internic.net/domain/named.cache and copying it to /var/named/etc/root.hints. I Just thought I would post that in case anyone else has/had the same issue. Cheers, Jamie The hints file was updated 10 days ago within the -current src tree. That is more so a warning than an error and your name server will work fine even without the most up to date hints file. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: ImageMagick and perl
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:54:05AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: It doesn't need to actually be built with support for threads, just to be linked with -lpthread. It doesn't but there is no point putting the effort in and not doing so. I have run into a few Perl projects over the years that do require it. Once perl is built with thread support you won't need this workaround. I'm not sure when this will be done though. Someone was working on this some time ago but I don't know how far that effort did go. Actual threaded perl support had issues on some arch. There were some issues with rthreads which threaded Perl exposed on alpha but that was fixed awhile ago. AFAIK all of the other archs were fine as is. Its about time this is fixed because this is just getting ridiculous. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Unused swap
- Original message - http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/login.conf.in http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/mklogin.conf http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=login.confsektion=5 plus, last i checked, firefox was not even 64-bit friendly anyways You're probably thinking of Windows and even there that isn't true. Ever other major OS FF runs on which has 64-bit support FF has been running on for years without issue. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: openBSD 5.2 amd64 on lenovo x201s
- Original message - El Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:08:24 +0100 Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com escribió: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Andriy Samsonyuk andriy.samson...@ch.tum.de wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:40:39PM +0100, Jes wrote: And probably no power on usb ports after resume, like my T410. have not checked yet Do i understand it correctly, that there is no chance of it running properly until the CEO of Intel want to improve his karma? You need to run current with latest HW. Not release/stable. IMHO OpenBSD is pretty usable in a laptop, old or modern. On the GPU side of things its pretty bad if not non existent for modern systems. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
