Hello Jay,
jh...@kevla.org (Jay Hart), 2018.07.27 (Fri) 04:42 (CEST):
> > Hello,
> > jh...@kevla.org (Jay Hart), 2018.07.25 (Wed) 21:31 (CEST):
> >> Running a stock 6.3 machine. I just bought a new server and hope to
> >> move this drive over, but think I need to move two partitions around
> >>
> Hello,
>
> jh...@kevla.org (Jay Hart), 2018.07.25 (Wed) 21:31 (CEST):
>> Running a stock 6.3 machine. I just bought a new server and hope to
>> move this drive over, but think I need to move two partitions around
>> at get more space.
>
> I'm not sure you need to...
> My /usr is just 895M.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 3:32 PM Jay Hart wrote:
> /var is a 6.3G partition (wd0e) using 50M of space
> /usr is a 2.0G partition (wd0f) using 1.6G of space
>
> What would the recommended procedure to use to swap these two partitions?
I wouldn't swap them exactly, rather I would make a /usr/local
Hello,
jh...@kevla.org (Jay Hart), 2018.07.25 (Wed) 21:31 (CEST):
> Running a stock 6.3 machine. I just bought a new server and hope to
> move this drive over, but think I need to move two partitions around
> at get more space.
I'm not sure you need to...
My /usr is just 895M. Yours is fuller
Hello,
Running a stock 6.3 machine. I just bought a new server and hope to move this
drive over, but
think I need to move two partitions around at get more space.
I have one drive installed, with about 6 partitions.
/var is a 6.3G partition (wd0e) using 50M of space
/usr is a 2.0G partition
Greetings. I'm curious whether the behavior I'm seeing is intended
when dealing with the situation of nested vnd files where the
lower/outer device is read-only (or whether I'm misunderstanding some
filesystem semantics). Full steps to reproduce are below (a little
verbose, I apologize) on
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:16:53 -0800
From: mlar...@azathoth.net
To: t...@tedunangst.com
CC: xx...@msn.com; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Suspend/Resume and USB filesystems
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 12:13:05AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Jan 03
I can make sure that I unmount any externally mounted filesystems
before suspending. Seeing as it's not going to be easy to fix, the
man page for apm/zzz/ZZZ should probably mention that suspending
while a filesystem is mounted is not supported.
I do
I've been running OpenBSD 5.4 off a USB stick and couldn't get suspend/resume
to work on either of my laptops. I thought maybe it was a driver issue but I've
now installed the latest snapshot to the internal HDD and suspend/resume seems
to be working fine. However, suspend causes a detach of
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:17, Helg Bredow wrote:
I've been running OpenBSD 5.4 off a USB stick and couldn't get
suspend/resume to work on either of my laptops. I thought maybe it was a
driver issue but I've now installed the latest snapshot to the internal
HDD and suspend/resume seems to be
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 12:13:05AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:17, Helg Bredow wrote:
I've been running OpenBSD 5.4 off a USB stick and couldn't get
suspend/resume to work on either of my laptops. I thought maybe it was a
driver issue but I've now installed the
While harmless it seesm pointless to create a filesystem that generates
warnings when fsck'd.
So check for -1 (an allowed value) in FSFree and FSNext fields, and
set FSNext to -1 in newfs_msdos, rather than setting it to a
value sure to be not a free cluster.
Anybody know of reasons to not do
Hello,
a filesystem created by newfs_msdos(8) is reported as faulty by
fsck_msdos(8). And it is indeed. Repeatable. There must be something
wrong. The media itself (a USB flash drive) doesn't have any issues.
# newfs -t msdos /dev/rsd4i
/dev/rsd4i: 31224352 sectors in 3903044 FAT32 clusters
Neither field is required. 'Free Space' in fsinfo can be -1 or just wrong,
and 'Next Free Cluster' is a hint only. Hence in either case you can fix
them up, or ignore their incorrectness and the filesystem is still
considered ok.
And since they are not required I guess newfs never bothered to
a status-check on softraid1 fails:
# bioctl softraid1
bioctl: Can't locate softraid1 device via /dev/bio
and a quick grep through dmesg reveals only one softraid device
(softraid0) mentioned.
Question: What's the right way to have multiple independent softraid
crypto filesystems
filesystems?
There is only one softraid, softraid0. A SCSI controller can have
multiple disks attached to it, so keep using softraid0.
This isn't documented per se, but discoverable by observing that
softraid0 is attached even when no softraid disks are. When you attach
the disks, only sd
I had a problem building something in ports ports with a default 2.0gb
/usr. I tried moving ports to /home/usr/ports to /usr/ports but I get...
Fatal: /usr/ports is a symlink. Please set to the real directory
Can I resize disklabel partitions and ffs filesystems?
If I can't I'm going to have
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:46:34PM +1100, John Tate wrote:
I had a problem building something in ports ports with a default 2.0gb
/usr. I tried moving ports to /home/usr/ports to /usr/ports but I get...
Fatal: /usr/ports is a symlink. Please set to the real directory
Don't try to make a
partitions and ffs filesystems?
If I can't I'm going to have to reinstall :-(.
/etc/mk.conf
PORTSDIR=real location
and ffs filesystems?
If I can't I'm going to have to reinstall :-(.
growfs. If you're lucky you won't screw up and lose everything.
. Please set to the real directory
Can I resize disklabel partitions and ffs filesystems?
If I can't I'm going to have to reinstall :-(.
growfs. If you're lucky you won't screw up and lose everything.
As the name implies, it only grows, you need to have or create
free space at the end
On 2012-05-20, Ralph Ellis ralphell...@netscape.ca wrote:
Clamav is the most easily available antimalware for OpenBSD. I would
also take a look at F-Prot for OpenBSD workstations or servers.
http://www.f-prot.com/download/corporate/
I have read some reviews that F-Prot has a higher
On 05/19/12 23:52, hvom .org wrote:
Hi all
I'm searching one soluce for protected my data ... . I'm look Clamav ( it's
a good idea ?), ESET is good antimalware for BSD.
You soluce and hack, help please.
Cordialy
Clamav is the most easily available antimalware for OpenBSD. I would
also take
On Sun, 20 May 2012 09:09:37 -0400
Ralph Ellis wrote:
OpenBSD itself is rarely a target for these exploits but if you are
using OpenBSD as a gateway or mail server for Windows systems, you may
find these programs helpful.
Don't forget, you may well be trading server for client security. Of
Hi all
I'm searching one soluce for protected my data ... . I'm look Clamav ( it's
a good idea ?), ESET is good antimalware for BSD.
You soluce and hack, help please.
Cordialy
Well, after reading Trouble with large files in current snapshot,
I would like to ask something different: it is true that FAT filesystems
of more than 120GB cannot be mounted? Will this change?
My experience is unfortunately, that it is true. It is not that I like
FAT filesystems
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:20:57 +
wrote:
it is true that FAT filesystems
of more than 120GB cannot be mounted? Will this change?
You can install ext support on windows but that's not as ready to go
without autoplay install which may be disabled anyway but does get
around the 2G max filesize
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:20:57AM +, sc...@web.de wrote:
Well, after reading Trouble with large files in current snapshot,
I would like to ask something different: it is true that FAT filesystems
of more than 120GB cannot be mounted? Will this change?
[...]
In my experience
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011, sc...@web.de wrote:
Well, after reading Trouble with large files in current snapshot,
I would like to ask something different: it is true that FAT filesystems
of more than 120GB cannot be mounted? Will this change?
Not that I'm aware of.
I remember when microsoft released windows 2000 and said that 32GB was
the limit and to move to ntfs. I was already using an 80GB drive and
the windows 95 manual also contradicted the claims.
Windows will not create FAT filesystems larger than 32GB, so in that
sense that is the limit
filesystems larger than 32GB, so in that
sense that is the limit. It will read and write to existing
filesystems however. There is a certain amount of wisdom on their
part for discouraging use of enormous FAT filesystems.
I have a 500GB FAT32 USB disk that I had to create from OpenBSD since
as you say
. Shame the
proprietary video surveilance machine it was setup for is a piece of
shit. It runs linux but only works with tiny msdos filesystems.
:40:24AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
I remember when microsoft released windows 2000 and said that 32GB was
the limit and to move to ntfs. I was already using an 80GB drive and
the windows 95 manual also contradicted the claims.
Windows will not create FAT filesystems larger than 32GB, so
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 11:20 +, sc...@web.de wrote:
Well, after reading Trouble with large files in current snapshot,
I would like to ask something different: it is true that FAT filesystems
of more than 120GB cannot be mounted? Will this change?
I did successfully create and mount 160 Gb
pat pkugri...@gmail.com wrote:
I could mount it [in OpenBSD] without errors but directory listing was
only giving me ~10 strange file names with all kinds of weird symbols,
That was also my experience. Mount command took time, and the directory
was as you described it. I immediatly unmounted
* John Tate j...@johntate.org [2011-11-19 11:46+1100]:
Also, where do I get started on learning to make ports?
http://openbsd.org/faq/ports/index.html.
I have a hard time understanding you were unable to find docs on this.
Misc/Ports,
gkrellm has an OpenBSD specific shortcoming. Depending on what USB
drives are plugged in, my softraid could be anywhere between sd2-sd6.
gkrellm needs to be reconfigured every time. The OpenBSD port of
gkrellm could instead support the uuids, and always display my two
physical AHCI
On 19/11/2011, at 1:46 PM, John Tate wrote:
Misc/Ports,
gkrellm has an OpenBSD specific shortcoming. Depending on what USB
drives are plugged in, my softraid could be anywhere between sd2-sd6.
gkrellm needs to be reconfigured every time. The OpenBSD port of
gkrellm could instead support the
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:46 AM, John Tate j...@johntate.org wrote:
Misc/Ports,
gkrellm has an OpenBSD specific shortcoming. Depending on what USB
drives are plugged in, my softraid could be anywhere between sd2-sd6.
gkrellm needs to be reconfigured every time. The OpenBSD port of
gkrellm
with
a fs_passno of 1, and other filesystems
should have a fs_passno of 2. Filesystems
within a drive will be checked sequentially,
but filesystems on different drives will be
checked at the same time to utilize
parallelism available in the hardware.
Second, in fsck/preen.c I see a construct like
be specified with a fs_passno of 1, and
other filesystems should have a fs_passno of 2. Filesystems within a
drive will be checked sequentially, but filesystems on different
drives will be checked at the same time to utilize parallelism
available in the hardware.
Second, in fsck/preen.c I see
Bohdan Tashchuk wrote:
Sorry I'm not subscribed to the misc@ list, I read on a web archive.
So I can't reply directly to the recent discussion about how to do
newfs / fsck etc on large file systems (memory issue).
I have one box with relatively limited memory and had to make a
change
Sorry I'm not subscribed to the misc@ list, I read on a web archive. So I can't
reply directly to the recent discussion about how to do newfs / fsck etc on
large file systems (memory issue).
I have one box with relatively limited memory and had to make a change directly
to /etc/rc (yes,
This is probably trivial, but what is the most elegant way to find out
which of the currently mounted filesystems are local, ie. mounted
off a local disk? A simple
mount | grep ' (local'
works for me, but is there a better way
(besides mount -t and listing the 'local' FS types
of the currently mounted filesystems are local, ie. mounted
off a local disk? A simple
mount | grep ' (local'
works for me, but is there a better way
(besides mount -t and listing the 'local' FS types)?
Jan
--
Aaron Mason - Programmer, open source addict
- Oh, why does
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
This is probably trivial, but what is the most elegant way to find out
which of the currently mounted filesystems are local, ie. mounted
off a local disk?
Careful: how strongly wedded to the idea that local==local disk?
OpenBSD
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
This is probably trivial, but what is the most elegant way to find out
which of the currently mounted filesystems are local, ie. mounted
off a local disk? A simple
mount | grep ' (local'
works for me, but is there a better way
(besides mount -t and listing
2009/2/12 Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM, auto709...@hushmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to end up with
a FAT 12 file system + some kind
of Netware (Novell or otherwise)
on a hard drive which used to
be a hard drive with one partition
through plugging in
Is it possible to end up with
a FAT 12 file system + some kind
of Netware (Novell or otherwise)
on a hard drive which used to
be a hard drive with one partition
through plugging in an Intenso Video Voyager
with a MicroSDHC?
It once was a functioning install...
In message http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=121259415410042w=1,
Alphons Fonz van Werven asked
Are there any means of encrypting filesystems other than using cryptfs
plus vnode? As far as I could find out, the latter imposes a size limit
of roughly 8GB which is acceptable for most partitions
Hey,
Jonathan Thornburg schrieb:
In message http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=121259415410042w=1,
Alphons Fonz van Werven asked
Are there any means of encrypting filesystems other than using cryptfs
plus vnode? As far as I could find out, the latter imposes a size limit
of roughly 8GB which
Hello,
I hope this is not a FAQ, but my homework so far (which includes reading
the FAQ and the installation guide as well as just Googling) hasn't
provided an answer.
Are there any means of encrypting filesystems other than using cryptfs
plus vnode? As far as I could find out, the latter
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:34:11 +, Alphons \Fonz\ van Werven wrote
Are there any means of encrypting filesystems other than using
cryptfs plus vnode? As far as I could find out, the latter imposes a
size limit of roughly 8GB which is acceptable for most partitions
but not all of them
Josh Grosse wrote:
There's no cryptfs in OpenBSD's ports tree.
Sorry - I must have been using FreeBSD for too long ;-)
In OpenBSD, either vnconfig(8) or mount_vnd(8) are used to mount
filesystem images, with or without encryption.
Manpages found - thanks.
Alphons
--
If riding in an
On 4-Jun-08, at 10:09 AM, Alphons Fonz van Werven wrote:
Josh Grosse wrote:
There's no cryptfs in OpenBSD's ports tree.
Sorry - I must have been using FreeBSD for too long ;-)
In OpenBSD, either vnconfig(8) or mount_vnd(8) are used to mount
filesystem images, with or without encryption.
Hi,
You get this error when putting files on a msdos filesystem:
mv: /mnt/usb/PRO2KXP.exe: set owner/group: Invalid argument
Do you think this should be ommitted in the case of an msdos
filesystem, as it is obvious that the permissions are not compatible.
I use the rox file manager to move
On 10/18/07, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You get this error when putting files on a msdos filesystem:
mv: /mnt/usb/PRO2KXP.exe: set owner/group: Invalid argument
Do you think this should be ommitted in the case of an msdos
filesystem, as it is obvious that the permissions are not
Hi,
On 18/10/2007, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think this should be ommitted in the case of an msdos
filesystem, as it is obvious that the permissions are not compatible.
If the duplication of the file characteristics fails for any reason,
mv shall write a diagnostic
Han Boetes wrote:
Alexander Hall wrote:
The problem is that nfs shares does not traverse file system
mount points once initialized. Since nfs probably was started
prior to mounting the msdos partition (with the noauto option in
/etc/fstab), nfs would only share the contents of the mount
Alexander Hall wrote:
The problem is that nfs shares does not traverse file system
mount points once initialized. Since nfs probably was started
prior to mounting the msdos partition (with the noauto option in
/etc/fstab), nfs would only share the contents of the mount
point directory itself.
/baz
There are 2 different bugs in the NFSv3 server implementation in OpenBSD
which prevent
a) exported msdosfs, ntfs probably other non-unix filesystems
b) exported ext2fs filesystems
from working properly.
For a) there's a fix in NetBSD(sys/nfs/nfs_serv.c:2831).
For b) there's a fix in the kernel
Boetes wrote:
Julian Leyh wrote:
Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed once again you can't export non-ffs filesystems
with NFS. Well you can export them, but after mounting the
partition on the client you won't see any files.
I can't verify this behavior... mounted a msdos filesystem
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:54:59PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Watch out for USB sticks!! Many now are coming with 'U3' - a piece of
crap piece of s/w that will try to crash your machine whenever you
insert it.
oh, so that's what happened
At 08:52 AM 9/11/2007 -0600, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
Here's a link to the removal page from U3:
http://www.u3.com/uninstall/
ah, thanks for the link.
Is it possible to remove it with fdisk/disklabel/newfs_msdos, or is it
more insidious than that?
-- Mark
Last time I tried to
L. V. Lammert wrote:
[...]
Last time I tried to disklabel a U3 drive, it trashed it. Might have
been an error in procedure, but the removal is pretty quick (assuming
you have a Windoze machine available). The only trick I found is to
start the remove utility at the exact same time you insert
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:36:50AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 08:52 AM 9/11/2007 -0600, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
Here's a link to the removal page from U3:
http://www.u3.com/uninstall/
ah, thanks for the link.
Is it possible to remove it with
drive. I'd like to be
able to access the unit from OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, and perhaps Windows.
What is the intersection of the sets of filesystems supported by these
various OS's?
There do exist ext2fs drivers for Windows; obviously anything which
boots the kernel, Linux, can read and write
At 10:33 PM 9/10/2007 +0200, Andrea Ferraresi wrote:
I think that the best choice is FAT32 it will works out-of-the-box on
all systems a usb stick isn't a device that must have some performance IMHO
Watch out for USB sticks!! Many now are coming with 'U3' - a piece of crap
piece of s/w that
L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Watch out for USB sticks!! Many now are coming with 'U3' - a piece of
crap piece of s/w that will try to crash your machine whenever you
insert it.
oh, so that's what happened when I put my new 4GB USB stick into a
Windows machine. On OpenBSD, it just
On 2007/09/10 23:54, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
oh, so that's what happened when I put my new 4GB USB stick into a
Windows machine. On OpenBSD, it just mounted like regular (but
looking at messages right now it actually shows up as an emulated CD
plus the regular drive)
Kinda like huawei
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/09/10 23:54, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
oh, so that's what happened when I put my new 4GB USB stick into a
Windows machine. On OpenBSD, it just mounted like regular (but
looking at messages right now it actually shows up as an emulated
On Tuesday 04 September 2007, Jona Joachim wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:17:44 +0200
Martin SchrC6der [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/3, The One [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FAT32.
And everyone can be compiled to read NTFS; Linux can even write to
it.
FreeBSD can also write NTFS using the
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:11:47 -0700
J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 September 2007, Jona Joachim wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:17:44 +0200
Martin SchrC6der [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/3, The One [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FAT32.
And everyone can be compiled to
On 9/6/07, Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:11:47 -0700
J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 September 2007, Jona Joachim wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:17:44 +0200
Martin SchrC6der [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/3, The One [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
To: Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Misc OpenBSD
misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2007 1:47:31 PM
Subject: Re:
filesystems?
On 9/6/07, Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep
2007 07:11:47 -0700
J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 September
Stanislav Ovcharenko wrote:
I don't think it's actually possible to
shrink NTFS partition in a Microsoft supported way only extend it with
diskpart.
WinXP and later support shrinking disks.
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/a6680b96-28df-4308-949d-bb3f91ca5d4b1033.mspx
Personally, ext2 should be an excellent choice; efficient disk usage and
read/write support in all those OSes, including Windows,
http://fs-driver.org/
I've been using that driver on Windows XP for a while now, so far no errors.
It's not open source or anything unfortunately; but the open
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:17:44 +0200
Martin SchrC6der [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/3, The One [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FAT32.
And everyone can be compiled to read NTFS; Linux can even write to it.
FreeBSD can also write NTFS using the ntfs-3g driver together with
fusefs.
Jona
--
I am chaos. I
Le mardi 04 septembre 2007 C 00:23 +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD a C)crit :
Salut,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
I think fat32 is a good choice: you have nothing to install.
Did you ever have to debug a deep directory structure where something
caused all
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 10:48:27PM -0400, stan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 07:22:47PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:23:34AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
I think fat32 is a good choice: you have
Salut,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 01:10:14PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
No I didn't. Is it so fun? :)
Oh yes. By the way, I must say that for additional fun, the directory
names were A, B, C, ..., Y, Z. Gives you quite something to search for.
Tonnerre
[demime 1.01d
.
2007/9/3, stan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm trying to decide what filesystem to use on a USB drive. I'd like to be
able to access the unit from OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, and perhaps Windows.
What is the intersection of the sets of filesystems supported by these
various OS's?
--
I'm sorry, no one
Salut,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:46:37AM +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Also you can use ext2(3) filesystem for this purpose: BSD works quite
OK with it (though with no journal support), Linux - ow, do you think
it's not?:) - and there are some tools in the Internet to be able to
read ext2
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 16:10:52 +0300
Ihar Hrachyshka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/3, Tonnerre LOMBARD [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Salut,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:46:37AM +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Also you can use ext2(3) filesystem for this purpose: BSD works
quite OK with it (though
I'm trying to decide what filesystem to use on a USB drive. I'd like to be
able to access the unit from OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, and perhaps Windows.
What is the intersection of the sets of filesystems supported by these
various OS's?
By the way, if you want to use OpenBSD to format a USB
Le lundi 03 septembre 2007 C 16:10 +0200, Jona Joachim a C)crit :
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 16:10:52 +0300
Ihar Hrachyshka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/3, Tonnerre LOMBARD [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Salut,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:46:37AM +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Also you can use
2007/9/3, The One [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FAT32.
And everyone can be compiled to read NTFS; Linux can even write to it.
Best
Martin
Salut,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
I think fat32 is a good choice: you have nothing to install.
Did you ever have to debug a deep directory structure where something
caused all directory to become files? On a 500G disk? Fun.
Ho so I'm not the only one :)
On 9/4/07, Tonnerre LOMBARD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Salut,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
I think fat32 is a good choice: you have nothing to install.
Did you ever have to debug a deep directory structure where something
caused
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
On the other hand, on some units long filenames ended up with MS-DOS
style 8.3 file names until I recreated the file system on them (newfs
-t msdos). Fortunately my new 4GB unit did not have that problem.
Also, it's worth noting that Vista and I think XP SP2 won't
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:23:34AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
I think fat32 is a good choice: you have nothing to install.
Did you ever have to debug a deep directory structure where something
caused all directory to become
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 07:22:47PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:23:34AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
I think fat32 is a good choice: you have nothing to install.
Did you ever have to debug a deep
I'm trying to decide what filesystem to use on a USB drive. I'd like to be
able to access the unit from OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, and perhaps Windows.
What is the intersection of the sets of filesystems supported by these
various OS's?
--
I'm sorry, no one here has any intentions of helping you
FAT32.
On 9/3/07, stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to decide what filesystem to use on a USB drive. I'd like to be
able to access the unit from OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, and perhaps Windows.
What is the intersection of the sets of filesystems supported by these
various OS's?
--
I'm
stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to decide what filesystem to use on a USB drive. I'd like to be
able to access the unit from OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, and perhaps Windows.
Once Windows is in the picture, you will need to go with a Microsoft
file system. Most of these drives anyway
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, John Nietzsche wrote:
Dear list members,
is there plans for openbsd to support multi terabyte filesystems?
Which release should i expect to see such support?
Thanks in advance.
Yes, work is being done. See
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20070601190500
Dear list members,
is there plans for openbsd to support multi terabyte filesystems?
Which release should i expect to see such support?
Thanks in advance.
Just curious, why do you need a terabyte of disk space (in one filesystem)???
Ioan
Ioan Nemes
0439-405-336
+61 2 9725-0236
John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16/07/2007 08:09
Dear list members,
is there plans for openbsd to support multi terabyte filesystems?
Which release should i expect
John Nietzsche wrote:
Dear list members,
is there plans for openbsd to support multi terabyte filesystems?
there is desire. There is work being done.
Which release should i expect to see such support?
The release it is ready for.
What do you want someone to say?
For example, do you want
Hello,
Did you enable portmap and nfs services in rc.conf.local? What error
message are you getting on the linux client? What does showmount -e
show on the server?
Both enabled.
I can mount /mnt/home2, but i get a Input Output error from my
linux box when i try to make a 'ls
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
