On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:25:44PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| | While it may be seen as distateful to make modifications to
BSD-licensed
| | code, and place those modifications under the GPL or a similar share
| | alike license, based upon what I understand of copyright law, it's
|
On 9/14/07, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar to
something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
for what my opinion is worth, I kinda like the OpenBSD installer the
way it
I was wondering whether this - http://openbsd.org/faq/faq3.html#ISO -
FAQ entry should be changed as OpenBSD now does provide ISO for base
install?
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Chris wrote:
I was wondering whether this - http://openbsd.org/faq/faq3.html#ISO -
FAQ entry should be changed as OpenBSD now does provide ISO for base
install?
Not until those are actually released.
-Otto
On 2007/09/14 12:55, Edwards, David (JTS) wrote:
Have you ever tried to do an install of FreeBSD/Linux using a 9600
serial console?
Oh thanks, I'd been trying to erase that from memory (-:
FreeBSD, 9600 serial, PXE boot. Took the best part of a day...
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:12:55AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:25:44PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| | While it may be seen as distateful to make modifications to BSD-licensed
| | code, and place those modifications under the GPL or a similar share
| |
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:29:43AM +0200, Reiner Jung wrote:
what have this to do with Microsoft? I assume nothing. Don't let us mix up
this topic.
It's an adaptation of an expression, it means don't bother me, go see if I'm
at (someplace I definitely am not).
The question here is not
Nick Holland wrote:
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 07:09 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
GNUspeak:
These are definitely not the views of the GNU project. They *might* be
views of the self-styled Linux nerds that think they are k00l and
eleet because they read Slashdot, but to imply
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:40:44AM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Can someone clarify the difference between /dev/tty00 and /dev/cua00?
to some extent these are documented in tty(4).
jmc
On 2007/09/14 09:40, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
But for local non-modem connect you want to use tip tty00 that
uses /dev/tty00, direct connect, no phone number.
I use cu -l cua00.
Can someone clarify the difference between /dev/tty00 and /dev/cua00?
tty(4) explains all.
* Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-14 07:02]:
As we are on the subject and I do not want to deviate from the original
question, I would however appreciate suggestions as to how I can have a one
server witch can actually have up to 32 serial console to control LOM on
Sun server. I
On Friday 14 September 2007 06:15, you wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
I installed FreeBSD once in my life. Took me 3 tries and I am sure some
kittens were murdered in the process. I am also pretty sure I wept at
some point. Honestly I can't remember a much worse installer; maybe SCO
Bob Beck wrote:
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar to
something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
As OpenBSD grows there simply is no reason, or logic to keeping around such an
archaic method of installation it now uses.
You no likey, you no usey!
Please
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:48:46AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I have to point out that I have been told on this list by a GPL fan that
the dictionary definition of freedom isn't correct. He was so friendly
to ask me who the hell I was to tell him what freedom means. Freedom
for him did
Darren Spruell wrote:
For the scenario where you have two openbsd hosts, one connected to
the second with a serial null modem cable, what is the right device to
use when connecting using tip(1) from the first to a console on the
second?
This works very well for me on i386;
2 null modem
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Look to me if a corporation wanted to kill the open source, they
couldn't pick a better way to do it and here the GPL is walking right
into it! Or may be some guys are well paid to create the problem and
destroy from inside what they can't kill from outside.
Off
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 04:53:23AM -0400, Tony Abernethy wrote:
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, June 1991
Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Everyone is permitted to copy and
Henning Brauer wrote:
there are multiport usb-serial adapters. and of course you can use
multiple of them.
This may be really really stupid, but for Mac minis that have no serial
ports listed in their dmesg (e.g:
http://erdelynet.com/tech/openbsd/openbsd-on-intel-mac-mini/) could you
use
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:49:33AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| I don't establish *anything*. It's in the preamble.
Your exact words are that's in the preamble, which establishes the
spirit (I left them in my reply so you can see for yourself). So the
spirit is established. I can play
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:42:13AM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| | 1. that's in the preamble, which establishes the spirit
| | 2. 4 paragraphs below you read:
| |
| | The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
| | modification follow.
| |
| | 3. later on
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:36:11AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
| On 2007/09/14 12:55, Edwards, David (JTS) wrote:
| Have you ever tried to do an install of FreeBSD/Linux using a 9600
| serial console?
|
| Oh thanks, I'd been trying to erase that from memory (-:
| FreeBSD, 9600 serial, PXE
Daft?
Nobody here defended that (the GPL)?
Are you tweedledee or tweedledum?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 4:33 AM
To: Tony Abernethy
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:49:33AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| I don't establish *anything*. It's in the preamble.
Your exact words are that's in the preamble, which establishes the
spirit (I left them in my reply so you can see for yourself). So the
spirit
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:16:46AM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote:
| Henning Brauer wrote:
| there are multiport usb-serial adapters. and of course you can use
| multiple of them.
|
|
| This may be really really stupid, but for Mac minis that have no serial
| ports listed in their dmesg (e.g:
|
Nice troll. There are some valid points. It is in this case that the
interaction between the different open source licensing groups does
*still* after all these years need to be smoothed out.
However, keep in mind that
1) a license is simply another tool
2) some[1] outside FOSS
No, according to your last email copncerning the introduction to the GPL,
the purpose is to make people daft and unsorted.
Are you Tweedledee or Tweedledum?
Please sort yourself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rui Miguel Silva
On 5/28/07, joshua stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tpb set to run as a daemon from ~/.xinitrc. The volume mute/down/up
buttons work, but none of the Fn buttons do except for the thinklight.
On-screen display also does not work. Is this something I can fix with a
simple configuration
Please don't touch the installer. It's just perfect.
I have tried tons of different unix/linux OS's before I saw The Light
and, pay attention, NONE of them was as reliable/robust/quick as
OpenBSD's
And guess... FreeBSD is getting a graphical installer:
PS: From http://wiki.freebsd.org/finstall/Amnesiac
the novice track, meaning as little interaction with the user as possible
This is what I meant...
2007/9/14, Pau Amaro-Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please don't touch the installer. It's just perfect.
I have tried tons of different unix/linux
Rui,
On 2007-09-14 11:13:11, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
The spirit of the GNU GPL is to maintain freedom for all users.
You don't seem to get the fact that the BSD license is *more free*
than the GPL because the BSD license imposes *fewer requirements*
on distribution.
Do you seriously
Paul de Weerd wrote:
I'm afraid not. It must be a real serial port, supported by the BIOS
and all that stuff. You can run a getty on a USB-serial adapter, but
console must be the real thing.
That makes perfect sense with the BIOS, thanks!
Thanks Theo, my pseudo device works!
On 9/13/07, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In which OpenBSD file do I define the major number for devices (both
regular and pseudo-device)? I have searched in several sources, and
the closest answer was for NetBSD, which says that major numbers
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:27:51AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:49:33AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| I don't establish *anything*. It's in the preamble.
Your exact words are that's in the preamble, which establishes the
spirit (I
On Sep 14, 2007, at 5:33 AM, Lars Noodin wrote:
Nice troll. There are some valid points. It is in this case that the
interaction between the different open source licensing groups does
*still* after all these years need to be smoothed out.
This has little to do with the community and
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:39:10AM +, Sebastien Carlier wrote:
Rui,
On 2007-09-14 11:13:11, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
The spirit of the GNU GPL is to maintain freedom for all users.
You don't seem to get the fact that the BSD license is *more free*
than the GPL because the BSD
I stopped and thought.
You are confused.
All your issues are confused.
My insane opinion is much more valid than yours.
Are you Tweedledee or Tweedledum?
Do you even know who you are?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rui Miguel Silva
Actually I do get the point that you are not talking about.
In my point of view, the GPL has NOT kept you from being a social failure.
You are what you see --- I sincerely hope not.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rui Miguel Silva
On 2007-09-14 12:24:25, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:24:25 +0100
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sebastien Carlier [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED], misc@openbsd.org,
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:24:25PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| On 2007-09-14 11:13:11, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
|
| The spirit of the GNU GPL is to maintain freedom for all users.
|
| You don't seem to get the fact that the BSD license is *more free*
| than the GPL
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I installed FreeBSD once in my life. Took me 3 tries and I am sure some
kittens were murdered in the process. I am also pretty sure I wept at
some point. Honestly I can't remember a much worse installer; maybe SCO
OpenServer but not by much.
Me
Thank you!
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:05:06AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:40:44AM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Can someone clarify the difference between /dev/tty00 and /dev/cua00?
to some extent these are documented in tty(4).
jmc
--
/ Raimo Niskanen,
I'm not using GENERIC.MP and Firefox freezes with the flash plugin..
But I really don't know if the problem is the flash plugin, I tried getting
one at adobe site, latest firefox and firefox crashes when I enter some page
that has no flash media. (firefox running with linux binary emulation :)
I'm
On 9/14/07, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 07:09 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
GNUspeak:
These are definitely not the views of the GNU project. They *might* be
views of the self-styled Linux nerds that think they are k00l and
eleet
On 9/13/07, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't. The OpenBSD installer is a very underrated part of the
overall user experience. What other OS can you install in 3 minutes
flat? Keep it simple, stupid.
Oh noes, you don't understand. See, I have a shaggy dog tale that
demonstrates
On 9/14/07, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To stay informed of new features, please supply your support contract
number on the page http://www.openbsd.org/update-me-when-stuff-is-done/
Unfortunately, 404 compliant.
--
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity.
Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As we are on the subject and I do not want to deviate from the original
question, I would however appreciate suggestions as to how I can have a
one server witch can actually have up to 32 serial console to control
LOM on Sun server. I may need up to
* Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-14 02:58]:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Look to me if a corporation wanted to kill the open source, they
couldn't pick a better way to do it and here the GPL is walking right
into it! Or may be some guys are well paid to create the problem and
destroy
Hi all
I'v looked through what documentation I could find, but didn't find this
case mentioned, so I assumed it would work (which it doesn't):
I have an OBSD 4.1 vpn gateway (A) with only one interface, over which
the default route points out and over which the packets to forward
through
* Bob Beck beck [2007-09-14 08:14]:
* Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-14 02:58]:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Doesn't this simply sound like making free software developers
and users lose their freedoms and work they've authored? Who wins?
probably the people who want to sell
My $0.02...I've tried MANY different flavors of *BSD, Linux, etc. and I firmly
think that OpenBSD's installer is exactly as it should be. It works well and
doesn't need eye candy to make it work better. I can do a CD install in 20
minutes...you can't beat that. If you want more eye candy go try
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:50:45PM +, Sebastien Carlier wrote:
Your point is that the BSD license is a wrong because it gives people
too much freedom. You just stated this again, even more clearly than in
your earlier message.
No, I never said the BSD license is wrong, you said that, not
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:29:44PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:24:25PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| On 2007-09-14 11:13:11, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
|
Fewer words, eh?
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:29:44PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:24:25PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| On 2007-09-14 11:13:11, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
|
| The spirit of the GNU GPL is to maintain freedom for all users.
|
| You don't seem to
Hey I checked out window(1)... doesn't seem like you can detach it,
logout, after 5 hours, log back in, retach, blah blah?
Or can you?
2007/9/13, Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Jon Sjvstedt wrote:
Ok, thanks! Please dont kill me any more!:)
Well one more:
Chris wrote:
I was wondering whether this - http://openbsd.org/faq/faq3.html#ISO -
FAQ entry should be changed as OpenBSD now does provide ISO for base
install?
As every release, many things are changed in the FAQ. Finding and
changing the things that need to be changed occupies a LOT of my
Dear all,
I have recently facing a problem when installing openBSD 4.0 on intel
S3000AH, it seems that the embedded gigabit ethernet (em1) is causing
this, since openBSD installer trap a kernel panic message when it tried to
load the module. In some discussion, to troubleshoot this is to
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As we are on the subject and I do not want to deviate from the original
question, I would however appreciate suggestions as to how I can have a
one server witch can actually have up to 32 serial console to control
LOM on
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 04:06:56PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:29:44PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:24:25PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| | On 2007-09-14 11:13:11, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| |
| | The
At 12:00 PM 9/14/2007 -0400, Trash Compactor wrote:
Alternatively, you can put puc(4) cards into an OpenBSD box or hook
up a tangle of ucom(4) adapters to a tree of powered USB hubs
There are several multi-port USB-serial adapters available. You can get
bus-powered ones up to around 8 DB9
Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A bit late too the discussion, but I have a similar issue with Opera
on OpenBSD. As with yourself, I don't even have to go to a
Flash-based site and Opera randomly freezes.
I'm seeing many freezes using Opera 9.02 on Linux. I don't think it's an
OBSD issue.
* Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070914 03:15]:
Bob Beck wrote:
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar to
something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
As OpenBSD grows there simply is no reason, or logic to keeping around
such an archaic method of installation it now
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:37:39 +0700, Sys.Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Sys Admin,
However, is this mean that I cannot, forever, use the em1 :D ?
Thanks again,
Hello Insan,
Friday, September 14, 2007, 8:55:21 AM, you wrote:
IPS Dear all,
IPS I have recently facing a problem when
On 9/14/07, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris wrote:
I was wondering whether this - http://openbsd.org/faq/faq3.html#ISO -
FAQ entry should be changed as OpenBSD now does provide ISO for base
install?
As every release, many things are changed in the FAQ. Finding and
changing
On 9/14/07, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darren Spruell wrote:
For the scenario where you have two openbsd hosts, one connected to
the second with a serial null modem cable, what is the right device to
use when connecting using tip(1) from the first to a console on the
second?
On 9/14/07, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:49:33AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| I don't establish *anything*. It's in the preamble.
Your exact words are that's in the preamble, which establishes the
spirit (I left them in my reply so you can
On 2007/09/14 22:55, Insan Praja SW wrote:
I have recently facing a problem when installing openBSD 4.0 on intel
S3000AH, it seems that the embedded gigabit ethernet (em1) is causing this,
Try 4.1 and, if that's no help, a snapshot.
If that's still no help, try 'boot -c' at the boot loader
On 9/14/07, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:29:44PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:24:25PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| On 2007-09-14 11:13:11, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
|
| The spirit of the GNU GPL
On 9/14/07, Trash Compactor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Thomas wrote:
On 9/14/07, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darren Spruell wrote:
For the scenario where you have two openbsd hosts, one connected to
the second with a serial null modem cable, what is the right device to
On Friday 14 September 2007 10:36, you wrote:
As every release, many things are changed in the FAQ. Finding and
changing the things that need to be changed occupies a LOT of my time
between lock and release days.
Truly, thank you for your hard work.
One of the many things that keeps me buying
L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 12:00 PM 9/14/2007 -0400, Trash Compactor wrote:
Alternatively, you can put puc(4) cards into an OpenBSD box or hook
up a tangle of ucom(4) adapters to a tree of powered USB hubs
There are several multi-port USB-serial adapters available. You can
get bus-powered ones
The FreeBSD version can be runned with fbsd binary emulation, but adobe
doesn't release the flash plugin for fbsd system, just for Linux, that's why
most people need a Linux emulated host browser to run the binary flash
plugin.
So no reason to emulate the fbsd browser, use native firefox instead
I have never claimed to be all that smart, so maybe I don't
understand something. But I am wondering what this squabble
over what this license says or what that license says is all
about. My understanding of copywrite law is that the author
of a work owns the copywrite. Therefore, that owner
One of the other sysadmins where I work has mostly used Linux, and got
used to their various hand-holding tactics. I've been gradually moving
us over to OpenBSD (and got them to purchase a CD set, and hopefully
some meager donations soon). Usually, I handle the installation and
administration, but
I can appreciate your intentions, but you're recommending waging a
propaganda campaign against a group of people that aren't going to be
moved by it.
Theo de Raadt is both knowledgeable, public, and straightforward, and
convincing a bunch of folks who are not also knowledgeable, public,
and
Hi,
I have an OpenBSD 4.1 system running as a NAT firewall for our office and
unfortunately I have to support a couple of active
FTP clients on the inside of the firewall, so I've set up ftp-proxy. I've
never used ftp-proxy before and I've run into a problem with it.
I've set up ftp-proxy and
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:13:05 -0700, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can appreciate your intentions, but you're recommending waging a
propaganda campaign against a group of people that aren't going to be
moved by it.
No, I'm asking you to protect your freedoms by expressing your distaste for the
Right.. you can do your own with less distribution sets (without X for
example), but OpenBSD now releases a base iso for installation, you can
found this for the pre-release 4.2 at
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/install42.iso if you wish
to try.
ps: Don't forget to ask you CD
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/09/14 12:55, Edwards, David (JTS) wrote:
Have you ever tried to do an install of FreeBSD/Linux using a 9600
serial console?
Oh thanks, I'd been trying to erase that from memory (-:
FreeBSD, 9600 serial, PXE boot. Took the best part of a
On 2007/09/14 13:48, Trash Compactor wrote:
L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 12:00 PM 9/14/2007 -0400, Trash Compactor wrote:
Alternatively, you can put puc(4) cards into an OpenBSD box or hook
up a tangle of ucom(4) adapters to a tree of powered USB hubs
There are several multi-port USB-serial
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:03:00AM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote:
$ sudo tip tty01
Is this just for boot messages? It's my understanding (minimal, at
that) that you can't do this for logins both directions because getty
will tie up the port?
Nope, full access as connecting from tty01 on one
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:36:33AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
As every release, many things are changed in the FAQ. Finding and
changing the things that need to be changed occupies a LOT of my time
between lock and release days.
Thanks, used often!!!
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:44:57AM -0600, Steven wrote:
You no likey, you no usey!
I do hope you realize that Bob didn't post what you were replying
too. :-)
Yes. I just replied to the list only.
At this point, I'd like to chime in and say that I find the
text-based OpenBSD installer
I am just wondering, how would it become worse if I would just set three
labels: /, swap and /home. What ways would it make my system worse?
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had
a name of signature.asc ]
On Friday 14 September 2007 07:09:51 you wrote:
Email the SFLC and FSF and remind them that Free Software consists of more
than the almighty penguin.
They belive defending their work from use in close source software to be the
only true way and therefore everyone who doesn't have the license
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
I am just wondering, how would it become worse if I would just set three
labels: /, swap and /home. What ways would it make my system worse?
Ehhh, a disk has a label defining partitions. It does not have
multiple labels.
For an answer to your
Paul de Weerd wrote:
Scenario A, this code is released under the BSD license. You can take
it, improve it and never share your changes with anyone.
Scenario B, this code is released under the GPL license. You can take
it, improve it and never share your changes with anyone.
Where is the
On 9/14/07, Insan Praja SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
I have recently facing a problem when installing openBSD 4.0 on intel
S3000AH, it seems that the embedded gigabit ethernet (em1) is causing
this, since openBSD installer trap a kernel panic message when it tried to
load the module.
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Celso Fernandes wrote:
Right.. you can do your own with less distribution sets (without X for
example), but OpenBSD now releases a base iso for installation, you can
found this for the pre-release 4.2 at
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/install42.iso if you
You should send us your pf configuration.
On 9/14/07, Jason Calhoun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have an OpenBSD 4.1 system running as a NAT firewall for our office and
unfortunately I have to support a couple of active
FTP clients on the inside of the firewall, so I've set up ftp-proxy.
Anyway, a while later he comes back and says, It's done! I couldn't
believe how easy it was.
This mirrors my (linux-coloured) experience of trying an OpenBSD
install for the first time.
--
steev
http://www.daikaiju.org.uk/~steve/
Sebastien Carlier wrote:
So, you are indeed taking the point of view that there is good freedom
and bad freedom, and that coercion is needed to allow good freedom
to prevail. I am glad you said so since it is totally related to what
follows.
Total freedom without coercion is anarchy.
On Thursday 13 September 2007, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:09:09AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Free software: It's all about the price.
The rest of the talk about freedom, etc. is just trying to keep
them from looking like cheap, greedy bastards.
At least for an awful
On 9/14/07, Jason Calhoun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have an OpenBSD 4.1 system running as a NAT firewall for our office and
unfortunately I have to support a couple of active
FTP clients on the inside of the firewall, so I've set up ftp-proxy. I've
never used ftp-proxy before and I've
On http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/jul/31/openhal/
you have:
--
About OpenHAL
OpenHAL is low-level interface software for Atheros 802.11 wireless
cards. Previously, Linux-based systems needed a proprietary Hardware
Abstraction Layer (HAL) plus a wrapper driver to
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
I'd love to see how an user who gets a modified binary version has the
freedom to modify it. Go ahead. Prove me that it doesn't allow some users
to loose freedom...
You make the point of using BLOB so well, Thank you!
Looking forward to see you fight for
On 9/14/07, Pau Amaro-Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't touch the installer. It's just perfect.
Ditto.
Talking to new users, the feedback I get is that they tend to screw up
partitioning, but other than that, no substantial complaints about the
install process.
Sure, it's not
Posted to ports-bugs, .. but nobody caught it.
Has anyone else noticed the p1 package is broken [Warning: Cannot change to
directory - known bug]? Is there a simple way to revert to p0 (which does
work)?
Lee
For 4.0:
--
/etc/inetd.conf:
ftp-proxy stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/ftp-proxy
ftp-proxy -m 55000 -t 180
--
/etc/pf.conf:
wired_if=xl0
wireless_if={ ral0, xl1 }
localhost_ip=127.0.0.1
# ftp-proxy
nat-anchor ftp-proxy/*
rdr-anchor ftp-proxy/*
On 9/14/07, David H. Lynch Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sebastien Carlier wrote:
So, you are indeed taking the point of view that there is good freedom
and bad freedom, and that coercion is needed to allow good freedom
to prevail. I am glad you said so since it is totally related to what
On Friday 14 September 2007, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:29:44PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:24:25PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
wrote:
| On 2007-09-14 11:13:11, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
| The spirit of the GNU GPL is to
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
