Re: [mochikit] Does anyone use this?

MochiKit was started specifically because Prototype didn't suit my needs and didn't have sufficient docs or tests :) On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 23:56 Arnar Birgisson wrote: > Prototype was one of the main contenders towards the end, before jQuery > took over. When I started

Re: [mochikit] Does anyone use this?

I don't think anyone is building anything new on MochiKit at this point. We sure did pioneer a lot of stuff people are doing today over a decade ago, but frankly all of the ideas are really just from other places outside the browser :) On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 20:01 Chaz Gatian

Re: [mochikit] Multiselect List

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Jurgens de Bruin debrui...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am very new to mochiKit and would appreciate some help. I have a form containing a multi-select list, I am try to use AJAX and JSON to produce async tasks. Currently I can't get all the selected elements from

Re: [mochikit] Is MochiKit Dead?

Good idea. Done! On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Chris Snyder chsny...@gmail.com wrote: Not Dead: Feature Complete. Since this issue comes up every year or so, I think there should be a simple explanation on the website homepage, something like: MochiKit is considered feature complete at

Re: [mochikit] Is MochiKit Dead?

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:35 AM, machineghost machinegh...@gmail.com wrote: So, given that: * There hasn't been a blog post on the website in ... ever (according to the front of the site; in reality there was a post back in 2008) * There hasn't been a release since 2008 * This mailing list

Re: [mochikit] MochiKit.I18n -- proposed new module for internationalization

This is pretty cool, something I always imagined that I might do if I were doing this kind of localization. We've only done en and zh at Mochi, so haven't needed anything outside of the system format. On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Per Cederberg cederb...@gmail.com wrote: Since I found the

Re: [mochikit] Mochikit.signal and DOM objects that don't exist yet (like jQuery.live)

That said, I think jQuery Live style functionality is useful, and I certainly wouldn't mind seeing some additional module to support it. However, all existing MochiKit functionality works only on the current state of the DOM and it is not a bug that it doesn't consider future changes to the DOM

Re: [mochikit] Re: Iter: __iterable__ support?

If I remember correctly the problem is that __iterator__ was defined on Object.prototype (to iterate over keys), so everything had it, and it made the registry worthless. Maybe if we moved that code to after the registry, or maybe checked to see if iterator.__iterator__ !==

Re: [mochikit] Code comments in MochiKit sources

It was for Aptana, not sure if anyone still cares? On Tuesday, October 12, 2010, Per Cederberg cederb...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone (Bob?) know why the MochiKit source code has these types of comments for most exported functions:    /** @id MochiKit.Signal.connect */ Cheers, /Per --

[mochikit] MochiKit moving to github

I'm in the process of moving MochiKit to github to remove the maintenance burden from the Mochi ops team, and make it easier to contribute. We're in the process of switching everything to git internally anyway, so it's about time: http://github.com/mochi/mochikit I think that we'll just go ahead

Re: [mochikit] svn.mochikit.com and trac.mochikit.com down

It looks like the ops team at Mochi has decommissioned the machine it runs on without realizing that services were still hosted there. I've filed a ticket to get these services back up, hopefully they haven't destroyed it entirely. On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Ethan Jucovy

Re: [mochikit] SpiderMonkey and MockDOM Issues

No idea what you're trying to do but it sounds like whoever packaged this with Ubuntu did the wrong thing. Surely there must be an up to date mirror of mochikit on github or something that can be used until service is restored. On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Kaleb Hornsby theka...@gmail.com

Re: [mochikit] Re: SpiderMonkey and MockDOM Issues

makes JavaScript a more robust programming language, I am trying to use both to do some server side programming. That's why MochiKit provides a MockDOM. I think that overall, it should not be coupled to the DOM at all. On Oct 7, 7:54 am, Bob Ippolito b...@redivi.com wrote: No idea what you're

Re: [mochikit] Mochikit.js does not download from Apache 2.2.3 on Centos 5.4/5.5

That's strange, I'm not seeing any problem with Firefox or Chrome on Mac. On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:42 AM, jonauman jonau...@nescent.org wrote: The file hangs at 8% download using curl. However, if I copy the javascript to a Mac server and I can download the file. I am not able to access

Re: [mochikit] Additional information for a bug

Well, the implementation of MochiKit's keys function was written years before any of the browsers implemented an Object.keys function. It's unfortunate that they don't do exactly the same thing, but changing the implementation of MochiKit's keys would break existing code. On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at

Re: [mochikit] Providing patch for ticket #361

You can send it here to the list On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:18 AM, niek.kouwenb...@gmail.com niek.kouwenb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've just created a ticket for which I have a patch. Since editing and replying to tickets seems to be disabled since 2008, I have no way of attaching this patch.

Re: [mochikit] JSON.parse MochiKit.Base.evalJSON

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Per Cederberg cederb...@gmail.com wrote: I just tried to modify MochiKit.Base.evalJSON() to use the new JSON.parse() function when available. This would give us the following advantages: 1. Speed (but, well... eval() is probably fast enough already) 2.

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit.DOM.getElementsByTagAndClassName performance

At least with recent browsers there are better ways to speed this up, e.g. by leveraging more native code (getElementsByClassName and/or XPath). None of them did this when the code was written in 2005 but I think all of them do now (except maybe IE). On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Per

[mochikit] Re: Base.js unescape reassignment and intrusion protection systems

There are various ways it could be rewritten, but without knowing exactly how stupid the IPS is it's hard to say which permutation would pass its test. Someone who can reproduce this issue should spend some time with it and produce a patch. On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 6:34 PM,

[mochikit] Re: Mapi function

the index of the item. The items() solution feels like a bit of a workaround and presumably has performance implications. Would a mapi function not be more efficient and elegant? Sorry if I'm missing something. Rupert On May 19, 4:13 pm, Bob Ippolito b...@redivi.com wrote: Typically this is done

[mochikit] Re: Mapi function

Typically this is done with count or cycle and izip. izip(cycle([odd, even]), someArray) On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Rupert Bates rupert.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, how about adding a mapi function to Mochikit.Iter which passes the index of the item being processed to the specified

[mochikit] Re: doSimpleXMLHttpRequest, IE and non ascii characters

You probably need to use encodeURIComponent. 2009/4/16 Boštjan Jerko ml...@japina.eu: Hi! I am using MochiKit 1.4 and have a simple usage of doSimpleXMLHttpRequest:         var handleServerFeedback = function(result)         {                 log(d_querystring);         }        

[mochikit] Re: why use MochiKit.Base.update to create the mochikit object hierarchy?

The reason I chose not to hide methods in a scope is so that you could monkeypatch them if you needed to. In retrospect I probably should've just done it in a scope because it would make the code smaller. Using an object literal was the compromise I chose between assigning each property by

[mochikit] Re: Defered.setFinal

Finalizing a Deferred should ensure that no further callback/errbacks are registered and it should attach a default error handler (success should be no-op). The most common problem I've seen with Deferreds is that an error occurs but nobody attached an error handler that far down the stack. In

[mochikit] Re: Curry and uncurry

The difference between currying and partial application is that you can call a curried function f with 1 argument that needs N arguments and the return value is a function f_1 that needs N-1 arguments and when called again with 1 argument will return a function f_2 that takes N-2 arguments, etc.

[mochikit] Re: connectEach shortcut

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Arnar Birgisson arna...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On 12.12.2008, at 16:45, Eoghan eoghanomur...@gmail.com wrote: connectEach($$('#my-ul li'), 'onclick', function(e){ // do sumn' }); rather than slightly more unwieldy:

[mochikit] Re: Problems with appendChildNodes?

Are you adding SPAN({}) to a string or something? appendChildNodes(idOfADiv, SPAN({})) should insert an empty SPAN, but appendChildNodes(idOfADiv, SPAN({}) + ) might have the behavior that you're describing. You want to use commas, not addition to add multiple nodes, e.g.

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit 1.4.1 released

I don't think anything relevant to the screencast has changed, although there are a lot of new things that one could talk about in a new screencast. I suppose it was probably a bad idea to associate the screencast with a version number. On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Cowmix [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit 1.4 released

Awesome! Thanks for all the hard work everyone, I owe many of you beers :) On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Congrats and thanks to everyone involved for all of the hard work that goes into maintaining this stable toolkit! Jason Bunting -Original

[mochikit] Re: Selector speedup by using John Resig's Sizzle

Well, the login database is outside of trac since we're using basic auth to login and they are the same credentials that give svn commit access. Disabling anonymous commenting is something that I did because I couldn't be bothered to implement a better spam filter or maintain it. I'm not really

[mochikit] Migrate to Google Code?

I've been considering this for a while but didn't want to put forth the effort at the time, but I think that with the release of 1.4 it would be a good time to migrate from the Mochi Media hosted Trac and SVN over to something else. My personal preference is Google Code because we already use

[mochikit] Re: Including MochiKit.DragAndDrop and MochiKit.Sortable in the packed version?

I had intended to build exactly that years ago, but never got around to it... mostly because it's hard to do client side and I didn't want that feature to be dependent on some server-side script. My thinking was that we'd keep packed versions of every module (so that we could continue to use the

[mochikit] Re: Including MochiKit.DragAndDrop and MochiKit.Sortable in the packed version?

by setting the window title or something. Cheers, /Per On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had intended to build exactly that years ago, but never got around to it... mostly because it's hard to do client side and I didn't want that feature

[mochikit] Re: Migrate to Google Code?

, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been considering this for a while but didn't want to put forth the effort at the time, but I think that with the release of 1.4 it would be a good time to migrate from the Mochi Media hosted Trac and SVN over to something else. My

[mochikit] Re: Why doesn't removeElement use the DOM Coercion rules?

If you'd like to fix it then I don't see why the patch would be rejected. On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's it huh? No more discussion on this? I guess I am smoking crack... Jason -Original Message- From: mochikit@googlegroups.com

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit.Async.doXHR

It looks like your problem is that your usage of partial probably doesn't do what you intend it to. request.addCallBacks( partial(this.typeLoaded, i), partial(this.typeFailed, i) ); With

[mochikit] Re: Formatting strings, numbers and stuff

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:01 AM, csnyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Per Cederberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Suggested formatting types: s - Output from toString(), this is the default r - Output from MochiKit.Base.repr() b - Binary. Outputs the number in base

[mochikit] Re: Formatting strings, numbers and stuff

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Per Cederberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess this is a question for Bob, but others might have some clues here also. Thus sending it to the list. I've recently done some Python coding and found the % string formating there very convenient. Now, as MochiKit

[mochikit] Re: Formatting strings, numbers and stuff

I think we should keep deep object names, JSON data structures are often nested a little bit and it's nice to be able to work with them as-is without creating a new object just to flatten it out. As far as nested replacements go, I think we can ditch that safely. I've never really wanted to use

[mochikit] Re: Selector speedup by using John Resig's Sizzle

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Arnar Birgisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 05:35, Amit Mendapara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another problem to which I am not sure is licensing issue, Sizzle is MIT licensed while MochiKit has dual MIT/AFL license. I myself thinking of

[mochikit] Re: Random Ideas for Mochikit.DOM

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:34 PM, machineghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First off, I do 3 Mochikit. I wasn't trying to bash it, I just wanted to share my opinion of it with someone who seemed to be in a similar position. part of the reason changes are looked at with suspicion is because a

[mochikit] MochiMedia looking for Web Developers

If you're reading this list, we know you use MochiKit, so how about coming and working with the team that developed it in the first place? We're looking for a Senior Web Application Developer experienced using Python, Pylons, MochiKit, SQLAlchemy, etc. Here's a short job description. Reply

[mochikit] Re: Problems using partial toggleElementClass as an event handler...

On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have this code in a control I have built: var ldel = this.LaborDataEntryList; connect(this.ExpandCollapseButton, onclick, function() { toggleElementClass(Invisible, ldel); }); What I originally tried to

[mochikit] Re: Flash/Flex port of Deferred?

I've done it before, for AS2 a long time ago (it was the predecessor of the JS implementation). Porting should just be cut + paste, MochiKit's Deferred doesn't do anything outside of the ECMAScript profile that Flash supports. On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Leo Soto M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[mochikit] Re: Django doXHR Headers and Guidance

mimeType: 'application/javascript' doesn't do what you think it does, it's the overrideMimeType on the XHR. For JSON it doesn't matter since it only uses responseText, I think it's only useful for setting it to XML. I think your problem is that XMLHttpRequest has a responseText attribute, not

[mochikit] Re: 1.4 release

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bob Ippolito schrieb: Documentation patches are key, and having more examples for the features in Visual would at least prove that they work under *some* circumstance :) I just noticed that MochiKit already

[mochikit] Re: Updated docs for MochiKit.Visual

This looks good to me, thanks! On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Per Cederberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've finished updating the docs for MochiKit.Visual now. The clarified version is available on the usual place: http://mochikit.com/doc/html/MochiKit/Visual.html Please let me know if

[mochikit] Re: Reasons to not use a simple ondomload signal?

Yeah, the major problem of doing a synthetic ondomload event like that is that you need to instrument all of your pages with that script tag at the bottom. It's nicer to do it via DOM calls because you don't need to change the markup. -bob On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Per Cederberg [EMAIL

[mochikit] Re: Anyone Else Interested in a New Synthesized onReady Event (ala JQuery)?

This would definitely be convenient, it's always been on my list and I've hacked together crappy (polling) implementations once or twice, but I never needed it bad enough to tackle all of the cross-browser issues myself :) On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Per Cederberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[mochikit] Re: Problem with packed version in trunk

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just stumbled upon an error when using MochiKit with HTML, and it took me some time to realize that it already has been fixed, but not in the packed vresion I was using - the packed version of MochiKit in the

[mochikit] Re: Can MochiKit support Comet/http push/long polling ???

I've implemented long-polling with MochiKit before. The JavaScript doesn't really change all that much, you just use doXHR like you normally would, the response just doesn't come back for a while and as soon as you get one then you make another one, and you have to have some sort of empty

[mochikit] Re: Trac tickets and code submissions

I watch trac with my newsreader, but for the widest exposure mentioning them on the list helps. On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Per Cederberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Just a simple question (for Bob I guess): Does someone monitor ticket submissions to trac.mochikit.com? Is it

[mochikit] Re: I'm having a problem with BindMethods

, everything works as expected. On Feb 5, 7:55 am, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Card = function(value, suit, orientation, set) { MochiKit.Base.bindMethods(self); ^^ self isn't defined here. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because

[mochikit] Re: I'm having a problem with BindMethods

Card = function(value, suit, orientation, set) { MochiKit.Base.bindMethods(self); ^^ self isn't defined here. On Feb 4, 2008 10:54 PM, Akari no ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have three files. var deck = new Deck(); loadPage = function() { var postRequest = new

[mochikit] Re: deferred callbacks that throw errors

On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, SimonS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm curious about the effect of the following code: var d = new Deferred(); d.addCallback(function() { alert('f'); throw new GenericError('foo'); }); d.addErrback(function() { alert('e'); }); d.addCallback(function()

[mochikit] Re: Shouldn't doXHR default to POST instead of GET to be proper?

On Jan 21, 2008 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 21, 1:16 am, troels knak-nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That depends on how you use it. The assumption is, that you are pulling data with doXHR. If you want to push data, you should specify the method. Most

[mochikit] Re: How prepend a prefix like /myapp/ to all URLs in MochiKit/Javascript?

Write your own function? I guess all XHR requests go through doXHR at some point, so you could swap it out with something else. Something like this might work: MochiKit.Async._old_doXHR = MochiKit.Async.doXHR; doXHR = MochiKit.Async.doXHR = function (url) { return

[mochikit] Re: 'this' in Draggable callback

On Jan 13, 2008 11:35 AM, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm something of a newcomer to MochiKit to forgive me if this is a silly question. When using Signal's 'connect' function to add signal callbacks I'm using the form: var obj = new MyObj; connect(window, onload, obj,

[mochikit] Re: Firefox Issues?

getElement(loginForm) finds an element with an id of loginForm. IE confuses name and id, other browsers don't. You don't have any elements with id=loginForm in your markup. Try using getElement(lfForm). -bob On Jan 2, 2008 3:45 PM, infringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I developed my site

[mochikit] Re: Async request problem on Safari

Have you tried using doXHR with the mimeType: 'text/xml' option? Take a look at the ajax_tables or interpreter examples for usage. On Dec 29, 2007 9:50 AM, Steve Zatz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No matter what I put in that XML declaration, Safari only returns something for responseText (tested

[mochikit] Re: callLater and this

On 12/20/07, Ian Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it intentional that the callLater() function causes the 'this' reference to get scrapped? Has nothing to do with MochiKit, JavaScript doesn't have bound methods like Python does. The binding of this is done by the method call syntax. It would

[mochikit] Re: callLater and this

On 12/20/07, Ian Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks bob, I guess it's been about 8 years. Good to talk to you again. High school feels a lot longer ago than that :) Tricky. I suppose you would run into this pretty much any time you pass around foo.bar when bar bound (or not) to the object

[mochikit] Re: Problem in IE not in Firefox - loadJSONDoc

On 12/19/07, JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the Javascript code which is located here: http://pastebin.com/m6d9fe26c It works 100% of the time when I use Firefox for my browser, but doesn't give expected results all the time with IE. The problem occurs after line 12. Here is an

[mochikit] Re: New INPUT short-hand functions?

It still wouldn't work because you need the arguments object, not arguments[0], for the call to apply. My personal preference would be to use merge because it wouldn't mutate the input object you give it, but there are potential efficiency concerns with all that extra overhead. The original

[mochikit] Re: Usage of Selector (or bug?)

It looks like the example is probably incorrect, it's marked as a constructor so you may need to use the new operator. var selector = new Selector(#someelementid); On 12/14/07, Glin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I tried to use selector example from Mochikit documentation: var selector =

[mochikit] Re: What is the purpose of __class__?

It's only used for introspection. Some of the repr's use it, the ones that don't probably should. It's not otherwise very interesting. -bob On 11/28/07, Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see this convention being used but don't understand why it exists: __class__ Is it

[mochikit] Re: Looser binding with bind() and more generic signalling

On 11/18/07, Per Cederberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #1. Is there a way to do late binding with MochiKit.Base.bind? I.e. allowing function names to be resolved when the returned function is called, rather than when bind() is called. See example below: obj = { a: function() { return a;

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

? On Oct 29, 4:23 pm, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's no need to fork the project, I would gladly hand over SVN access to someone who wants to step up as a release manager. -bob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

There's no need to fork the project, I would gladly hand over SVN access to someone who wants to step up as a release manager. -bob On 10/29/07, gsteff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't use Mochikit, but like the library, and check in on the newsgroup now and then. If a lot of people want to

[mochikit] Re: twoDigitFloat bug

That's how floats work, 568.80 is represented internally as (roughly) 567.7999. numberFormatter rounds though, you can use numberFormatter(#.##)(568.80) which should give you what you want. On 10/8/07, Pedro Belo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys, I'm running into something that looks like a

[mochikit] Re: How to get Signal.connect code rendered via .innerHTML replacement to work?

On 10/4/07, John Lorance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Problem: I have a button on a page that results in getting HTML back from the server which contains something like the following (result['content'] (below) contains the following): innerHTML doesn't execute script. You could try

[mochikit] Re: Activity

On 10/3/07, scipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 18, 11:59 am, Beau Hartshorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18-Aug-07, at 8:44 AM, Lee Connell wrote: Mochikit hasn't seen any activity in the revision history at least since 06, is mochikit fading? We're pretty busy with our own

[mochikit] Re: $ in jQuery, Prototype and Mochikit

MochiKit doesn't actually use $, it's just an alias for getElement that we export for the user's convenience. You can load whatever library you want after MochiKit and let it take over use of $, nothing will break. -bob On 9/2/07, jack.tang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, all I blogged one

[mochikit] Re: Comparing dates

On 8/28/07, grum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, I'm having problems comparing the following: isoTimestamp(2007-08-13T04:00:00+00:00) which gives me: Mon Aug 13 2007 00:00:00 GMT-0400 (EDT) and: Date() which (right now) gives me: Tue Aug 28 2007 16:14:12 GMT-0400 (EDT)

[mochikit] Re: Deferred.addCallbackMethod

On 8/22/07, Giulio Cesare Solaroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, using the excellent MochiKit.Async module, I find myself writing the following code over and over: dererred.addCallback(MochiKit.Base.method(anObject, 'aMethod'), aParam, ...); It look like it would be nice to add a

[mochikit] Re: callLater and IE

On 8/21/07, Jonathan Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm not sure if this is a bug in Mochikit, or my error. The following do not work in IE 6: script callLater(1, window.print); callLater(2, alert, 'drink beer'); /script yet these do: script function f() {

[mochikit] Re: Why No DL/DT/DD Functions?

They are not deliberately left out. If a patch were made to the documentation and code it'd be applied. -bob On 8/3/07, machineghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps it'd be more helpful if I rephrased this question: If someone (ie. me) were to write createDOM shorthand functions for DL,

[mochikit] Re: Async status success return codes question

Implement a workaround. Just write an errback that turns 2xx into a successful response, that way your code will still work if the behavior eventually changes. On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So is this yet another thread on success codes that ends without consensus or

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit Development

On 7/18/07, Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I *am* curious as to the effort to get us to an official '1.4' release - seemed like there was a bit of momentum a few weeks/months back to get all bugs fixed and get it shipped, but then it seemed to die. I think that most or all of the

[mochikit] Re: create form in document

On 7/16/07, MerlinTheCat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm well versed in JS - but I've been struggling to understand MochiKit for a couple of days... help from anyone who can clear my brainblock would be appreciated. Thanks. I'm trying to add a form on the page dynamically. The H1 and

[mochikit] Re: Can't get 'this' to point to the right object

On 7/9/07, TiNo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am having another problem with 'this' again. I have to classes (better said, that's how I would like them to behave), EditGrid and EditCell: --- var EditGrid = function (base_url,target_id) {

[mochikit] Re: 'this' and addCallbacks

On 7/9/07, kael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This doesn't work. When the callback, dataReciever, is called it doesn't know what 'this' is any more. I want dataReciever to update the object and then call this.showRecord. SBP.prototype.dataReceiver = function(data) { // data is an array of

[mochikit] Re: 'this' and addCallbacks

On 7/9/07, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/9/07, kael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This doesn't work. When the callback, dataReciever, is called it doesn't know what 'this' is any more. I want dataReciever to update the object and then call this.showRecord

[mochikit] Re: Async status success return codes question

On 7/5/07, Karen J. Cravens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 5, 8:19 pm, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with (the ones that you actually run into in the wild). It's easy to Given the increasing popularity of REST, seems pretty likely you'll start running into a wider range

[mochikit] Re: Async status success return codes question

On 7/6/07, Karen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/6/07, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As demonstrated it's effectively three lines of code to do whatever you want to do with HTTP status codes, and you only have to write it once. If that really makes such a difference, then I doubt

[mochikit] Re: Async status success return codes question

On 7/6/07, Karen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/6/07, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It works 100% of the time. If you're doing something obscure with status codes (anything obscure, even successful codes that aren't 2xx), you need to use an extra three lines of code in this case

[mochikit] Re: Async status success return codes question

On 7/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been working with Async to build an inhouse web app, we have ended up using the return codes to implement some interesting behaviour in our clients. MochiKit is just one of the clients that uses the web service and some of our

[mochikit] Re: 'this' gets overridden on every function call

On 6/20/07, TiNo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the following code (shortend): -- var EditGrid = function (base_url, target_id) { bindMethods(this); this.base_url = base_url; this.target_id =

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit DOM manipulation performance?

On 6/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've been reading a bit about some optimised DOM manipulation libraries developed for the yui-ext, jQuery and Dojo toolkits: http://www.jackslocum.com/blog/2007/01/11/domquery-css-selector-basic-xpath-implementation-with-benchmarks/

[mochikit] Re: Different search result for different browser

On 6/17/07, tired [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I try to search on JSON file with same search key in different browser with sortable table, the result is different. IE6 shows only those results (row) where search character(s) arrive at the very beginning (like first letter(s) of sentence) of

[mochikit] Re: How prevent mochikit from html entity decode of sortable data?

On 6/15/07, tired [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have used the 'mochikit sortable' table to sort data (loading a json file through ajax). In that table one of columns has linked data which htlml entity decoded by mochikit, so it show raw html instead link. For example, I supplied the data like

[mochikit] Re: createDom option example please

On 6/15/07, hotani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. Like I say, this is not very clear to me right now, and I'm trying to create an option list for a drop-down. Let me put up my shot-in-the-dark example, then maybe someone can correct me: // add a single value/text option to drop-down:

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit.Async, synchronousness, and testing

On 6/11/07, GK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been Googling around looking for tools to help with testing of asynchronous code using mochikit's Deferred's. The only thing I found so far was this post from over a year ago, to which there was no response.

[mochikit] Re: Arabic Spam

On 6/10/07, Arnar Birgisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/9/07, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just changed the moderation settings to moderate all messages from new users. I'm not sure how much that's going to help though. I'll volunteer as a moderator if you like. I'm

[mochikit] Re: getNodeAttribute Doesn't Work In An OnFocus Handler

On 5/22/07, MikeC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that I am being forced to not use getNodeAttribute in one instance. I created a small example (see below) of where it seems to fail. My little example contains two text boxes. You enter some text in the first one and the onfocus handler for

[mochikit] Re: IE6 problem with OPTION

On 5/17/07, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I'm trying to create a page that will populate a collection of SELECT's using some AJAX requests. The AJAX part goes fine and I get data back from the server, it's just when I'm trying to create new options that I'm running into problems with IE6

[mochikit] Re: Does Mochikit accept patches for Format.LOCALE ?

On 5/16/07, Roger Demetrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it is possible, could you guys add this brazilian-portuguese locale to MochiKit.Format.LOCALE ? ... pt_BR: {separator: ., decimal: ,, percent: %}, ... Ok, it's in r1292. -bob

[mochikit] Re: evalScripts:true equivalent in Mochikit?

On 5/15/07, Spiderr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Kevin, This works great! This seems a very fundamental thing to want to do... am I missing something? Why isn't this in Async.js or similar? It's not really that common. Most people using MochiKit are loading data, not code, and if they

[mochikit] Re: Bug in queryString?

On 5/3/07, Arnar Birgisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, The current svn version of queryString gives me something unexpected on this queryString({nonni:null, x:3}) It gives me a silent error and no result. The docs say attributes with null values or undefined will be skipped, so I

[mochikit] Re: Fix for CVE-2007-2381

On 5/1/07, Konstantin Ryabitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello: Will there be a fix for http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-2381 in the 1.3.1 branch? Nope. It's not a real security issue, not with MochiKit anyway. The recommended fix would mean supporting some junk that's not JSON

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >