From: rgv1...@live.com
To: toddfeier...@msn.com
Subject: RE: [MOPO] James Gresham VS. Jaime Mendez Lawsuit DISMISSED!
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:50:32 -0600
Hi Todd-
Thanks for sharing this update.Jaime has always been a good egg in my
book and a damned talented craftsman when it come
Jaime is a very talented restorer
he is also an admitted forger
sadly, one talent overshadows the other... and it isn't the good one
Rich
At 09:53 PM 1/11/2010, S.F. Poole wrote:
--
From: rgv1...@live.com
To: toddfeier...@msn.com
Subject: RE: [MOPO] James Gresham VS. Jaime Mendez L
The thing is, Jamie publicly *confessed* to making the fakes and
provided the prosecution with a list of the items he created. Whether
his cooperation with the prosecution now gets him removed from the
lawsuit or some other considerations doesn't change the fact that -- by
his own admission --
For what it's worth, Jim Morrison (The Doors) alluded to "The Scream Of
The Butterfly" in his song "When The Music's Over". He later said that in an
interview that the title of this film was the origin of the image in his
mind. Just some worthless non-poster knowledge...
Was Michael Jackson ever guilty? Most said yes even after his court shananagans
were dismissed. Doesn't change the fact he is the king of pop.
The law is an ass, always has been, always will be. My sister is now a lawyer
and she even thinks it's crazy.
I have always had alot of time for Jamie,
Hi, looking for a
Star Wars pre-awards Quad (1977) preferably UNFOLDED
+
Empire Strikes Back Quad - silver background with Black writing - also near
Mint or unfolded
Thanks,
Wolfgang Jahn
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
_
Gee, why did I predict this one? The fact that he produced the fakes is
not enough under the law to convict him. FRANC
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 7:13 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject
I think the point is if the fakes were produced that is one thing, it is when
they are sold for a profit without description as fake that is another. If
Jaimie sold them without describing them as reproductions then he is in breech
of the law, if he was contracted to produce them for a third p
It's not worthless, Rick, it's very interesting
Zeev
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of
rixpost...@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 6:25 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Scream of the Butterfly.??? 1965 busty adult noir
It seems some of us are not listening.
Jim Gresham said the case WAS NOT dismissed, just taken out. For now. Why
are all the "legal experts" already trying to rationalize his legal
innocence.
Adrian, Is the forger of fake dollar bills innocent because he just created
them? He may claim he t
Amen, brothers. You think maybe when someone makes two or three fake Black
Cat one-sheets and then sees that one or more supposedly *real* ones sold
for hundreds of thousands, they might put two and two together? Or when
zillions of "originals" that are identical to the zillions of fakes you just
c
It goes without saying that week in and week out we auction hundreds of
items that sell for low, low prices (we actually sell lots and lots of items
for $1 and $2, and a decent percentage of what we auction goes for $14 and
under, and our leading 'competitor" *NEVER* auctions a single item for less
There lies the dichotomy...did the forger know what was going on with those
fakes?
In the eyes of the law he has to be proven guilty. We all have an inkling of
why he was doing those fakes, they were for his client...what his client does
with them is up to the client.
Morally would you as a
Sean
It is really beyond belief that you continue until attack Debi. Have you
NEVER been involved in a lawsuit? The First thing that your attorney tells
you is not to discuss the case. It will be interesting to see what finally
comes out. And I hope that you will be as quick to apologize as you ha
Forging American currency is illegal, in and of itself. Making copies of
original posters is not illegal in and of itself. That's the difference.
Trying to pass off copies of original posters as original is what's
illegal.
FRANC
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.
No kidding. We know that. The law IS different in both cases and that's
how crooks(not talking about anyone specific) take advantage. Don't you see
there is something wrong here?
I don't have the answers, I'm just asking questions.
Zeev
From: Franc [mailto:fdav...@verizon
I responded to you because you asked a question and didn't seem to
understand the difference. Don't ask if you already know
the answers. FRANC
-Original Message-
From: Zeev Drach [mailto:lobb...@rogers.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 11:17 AM
To: 'Franc'; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.E
I currently have 23 eBay listings, all of which close Friday or Saturday
evening.
Some collectors have experienced difficulty opening my eMails which often
contained many links. Consequently, I am only including a single link in this
eMail, which will take you to all my eBay listings.
Al
To everyone within ear shot of this email.
Jaime admitted to knowingly create fakes and while I have not read
the testimony he provided yet, I cannot tell at what point in the
"scam" that Jaime knew what the Master Criminal was doing with the
"reproductions" that he created.
However as a com
Hey, Mopoers:
I've just added a bunch more great original vintage movie posters and lobby
cards to the Posteropolis (http://www.posteropolis.com) website!
Included are two Universal Creature pieces, several Ray Harryhausen special
effects lobby cards, a hard-to-find monster card from IT! The Te
Jim,
you do realize that this is a civil suit and not a criminal one, yes? Innocent
until proven guilty isn't really a term used in this case, that's for criminal
trials (such as Haggard's upcoming trial when the FBI arrest him).
But I wasn't attacking Debi, just expressing my disbelief that her
GREAT post Sean, and all points, concisely given and explained.
Jeff
On Jan 12, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Sean Linkenback wrote:
Jim,
you do realize that this is a civil suit and not a criminal one,
yes? Innocent until proven guilty isn't really a term used in this
case, that's for criminal tri
you're just jealous
: - )
At 04:30 PM 1/11/2010, Bruce Hershenson wrote:
But there are people who pay BIG money for super-old cars, and some
of those have rumble seats, and THOSE guys would think nothing of
spending a grand on this poster
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Paul Gerrard
<
ONE SHEET
THREE SHEET
SIX SHEET
TWENTY FOUR SHEET
INSERT
HALF SHEET
LOBBIES
or any interesting original material
Original material is sought, but we would also like something from the
1952 reissue.
Kirby McDaniel
MovieArt Original Film Posters
P.O. Box 4419
Austin TX 78765-4419
512 479 66
We have a three sheet for this 1955 Hitchcock film, which needs
backing.
We will sell for $175.00 to any MOPO member.
Ship $8.50
Inquire ki...@movieart.net
Kirby McDaniel
MovieArt Original Film Posters
P.O. Box 4419
Austin TX 78765-4419
512 479 6680 www.movieart.net
mobile 512 589 5112
The closest analogy which I think this can best be compared to is this...
Gun manufacturers, manufacture guns legally
Gun dealers sell guns legally
If I go into a gun shop and purchase a gun legally and on the paperwork I state
that I'm going to use the gun for hunting purposes, but then I
In this instance the gun dealer and manufacturer are one and the same.
And the question is, should a gun dealer continue to sell guns to someone they
know is killing people with them?
- Original Message -
From: Todd Feiertag
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, Janu
http://twitter.com/CHANNINGPOSTERS
This twitter page will feature interesting new posters and
acquisitions and include links to my EBAY Store: CHANNINGPOSTERS and
my Facebook Fan Site: CHANNINGPOSTERS -- The World of Movie
Memorabilia. I will be tweeting about once a week. . .
Thanks, Ch
Sean- Therein lies the rub. If Jaime KNEW what Kerry was doing with the
repros., that is wrong and means definite culpability.
I have used Jaime's services on several occasions and never once did he ask me
what my intentions were for the pieces he worked on
me for. He or any restorer
Hi Steve,
I too have used Jaime's service and never once has he asked what I was going to
do with the item after it was restored (nor should he in normal circumstances).
Jaime testified that Haggard told him he (meaning Haggard) was keeping them for
himself and using them to display once he sold
30 matches
Mail list logo