Hi Marco,
Did you had a chance to talk to Ademir?
SCC/SCC+ are already implemented in FPGA by Ademir Carchano.
Does anyone know his working e-mail? His page is down...
Actually his e-mail is also down.
What do you wanna know about Ademir projects? Maybe I can talk to him.
I
Hi,
Ah. Heh, it's great to actually have direct communication with one of the
VHDL coders out there, since contact with all others has to go through
other people :). I just re-read the MSX print, and the part about the
cooperation
I agree, and it seems that this is one of the barriers
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 17:12, Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Snout wrote:
But the efforts of changing to a standardized methodology could lead to
rapid
realisation of a one-chip MSX. At least, that's the way I see it.
Yes, I agree, and as a hardware developer,
I want to buy his MegaIDE cartridge. It's a very awesome piece of hardware...
I will check the price with Ademir.
If he has some available, I can work for a while as an international sales
representative.
Excellent idea! Your English is very good, so if you'll find some time to translate
Hi all,
If japanese people were a bit less sceptic about non-japanese people skills
and projects, I think this would be a good idea.
...
Their culture is so different from ours it's impossible to communicate at
the same level as you do with most of the rest of the world. Even if a
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Jon De Schrijder wrote:
I just wanted to say that from time to time I have very good contacts
with the japanese hardware people and Tsujikawa even asked me to join
his project. Too bad I don't have that much time left for MSX and I'm
already writing VHDL all day for my
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 17:56
Subject: Re: [MSX] PSG REPLACEMENT WORKS FINE!!!
PSG implemented in an FPGA.
Excellent work. If you will be able to do the same for MSX-Music and
SCC/SCC+ chips, you will shake this
world ;)
SCC/SCC+ are already
Well, I think it is a matter of negotiation between the VHDL-coders.
Personally, I didn't like the agreement proposed by Tsujikawa.
And there is another problem: my design methodology is based in chip
replacement, and Tsujikawa's methodology consists in creating new
boards. This method is
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Laurens Holst wrote:
Yet, these efforts aren't joined, which I think *really* is a shame. If all
these people would join their efforts, I honestly believe a one-chip MSX for
example could be made right now, or at least in the not-so-distant future,
say, within the year!
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Snout wrote:
But the efforts of changing to a standardized methodology could lead to
rapid
realisation of a one-chip MSX. At least, that's the way I see it.
Yes, I agree, and as a hardware developer, I am here open for
discussions. So, what about the japanese hardware
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Laurens Holst wrote:
If we can choose an standardized design methodology, I think we can
exchange our codes. My VHDL coding-style is technology-independent, which
means that one can use it for implementing in Xilinx FPGAs, in Altera
FPGAs, and also for ASIC
SCC/SCC+ are already implemented in FPGA by Ademir Carchano.
Does anyone know his working e-mail? His page is down...
Dark Soul
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Get your free mail box @ http://www.mail.md
___
And also, if the ESE FPGA project belongs to the MSX Association or
not. Personally, I think that if the MSX Association wants to make money
with the hardware developed by Tsujikawa, then I also want. For me it's
not clear what is the goal of ESE.
ESE FPGA project is NOT part of MSX
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Dark Soul wrote:
SCC/SCC+ are already implemented in FPGA by Ademir Carchano.
Does anyone know his working e-mail? His page is down...
Actually his e-mail is also down.
What do you wanna know about Ademir projects? Maybe I can talk to him.
[]'s
Ah. Heh, it's great to actually have direct communication with one of
the
VHDL coders out there, since contact with all others has to go through
other
people :). I just re-read the MSX print, and the part about the
cooperation
I agree, and it seems that this is one of the barriers of the
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Patriek Lesparre wrote:
And also, if the ESE FPGA project belongs to the MSX Association or
not. Personally, I think that if the MSX Association wants to make money
with the hardware developed by Tsujikawa, then I also want. For me it's
not clear what is the goal of ESE.
SCC/SCC+ are already implemented in FPGA by Ademir Carchano.
Does anyone know his working e-mail? His page is down...
Actually his e-mail is also down.
What do you wanna know about Ademir projects? Maybe I can talk to him.
I want to buy his MegaIDE cartridge. It's a very awesome piece
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Dark Soul wrote:
SCC/SCC+ are already implemented in FPGA by Ademir Carchano.
Does anyone know his working e-mail? His page is down...
Actually his e-mail is also down.
What do you wanna know about Ademir projects? Maybe I can talk to him.
I want to buy his
PSG implemented in an FPGA.
Excellent work. If you will be able to do the same for MSX-Music and SCC/SCC+ chips,
you will shake this world ;)
Dark Soul
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Get your free mail box @ http://www.mail.md
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Dark Soul wrote:
PSG implemented in an FPGA.
Excellent work. If you will be able to do the same for MSX-Music and
SCC/SCC+ chips, you will shake this world ;)
It is possible, but I don't have enough specifications of how MSX-Music
and SCC/SCC+ work. In fact, I only
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: [MSX] PSG REPLACEMENT WORKS FINE!!!
On www.msx.org we currently have a small discussion about the developers
of
FPGA devices.
Quote from me: Personally, I think the Japanese and Brazilian
FPGA-developers should
So, I must say I really agree with Snout here!
As I read in Ikeda's MSX-Print the Japanese people who built the TMS9918
already tried to contact people from Brazil to cooperate, and I think it
would be nice if that offer would be accepted!
If japanese people were a bit less sceptic about
If japanese people were a bit less sceptic about non-japanese people
skills
and projects, I think this would be a good idea.
Communicating with Japanese isn't always easy. The offer in the MSX-PRINT
was a way of saying they DO appreciate your skills I guess ;)
Greetings,
Sander
=/news.asp?newsid=673
Greetings,
Sander
http://www.msx.org
http://www.benjaminb.nl
- Original Message -
From: Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 17:56
Subject: Re: [MSX] PSG REPLACEMENT WORKS FINE!!!
PSG
Hi people,
I am in my lab right now (yes, in a Sunday), this was the only way for
having some spare time for mounting a small circuit board for testing the
PSG implemented in an FPGA.
The VHDL code was already exhaustively tested through out simulations
(using Xilinx CAD software, Xilinx
25 matches
Mail list logo
