Aborted unmodified message

2001-06-28 Thread bren
the way through inputting the To: and Subject: fields and then I get the message Aborted unmodified message. Any ideas on where I should start? Is there an error logging function that I can turn on? thanks! -- Bren Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] (via Pine!)

Re: Aborted unmodified message

2001-06-28 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
I try to create a message I get all the way through inputting the To: and Subject: fields and then I get the message Aborted unmodified message. Any ideas on where I should start? Is there an error logging function that I can turn on? What's the path to your editor? Maybe vi (or vim

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-28 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 18:42:38 -0400, David T-G wrote: Yep, that was what I meant. Did you try a simple :set shell=/sbin/sh from within mutt? Did you try :set ?shell to see what mutt thinks $shell is holding? The $shell variable is /only/ used for the shell-escape command

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Marc van Dongen
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : I rather suspect that the path to vim is wrong in his .muttrc : Especially if he had an rpm install which would dump vim in /bin or /usr/bin - : and then compiled a new vim from a tarball, that'd put it into /usr/local/bin : : Use `which vim`

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Marc van Dongen proclaimed on mutt-users that: That's not the problem. Mutt doesn't seem to let me edit at all. With this setting, I can postpone a message for later, then recall it and use `e` to edit but mutt won't let me Then check if your tmpdir directory is set properly, or is

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread David T-G
Marc -- ...and then Marc van Dongen said... % David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: % % : % Aborted unmodified message. % : % % : % Any suggestions how to overcome this problem? % : % : You might start by checking your $editor setting in your muttrc and your % % My editor setting points

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Marc van Dongen
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] : % : If you can't figure out what's up, try setting mutt's $editor to a : % : quickie script which calls vim and then waits for a keypress before : % : exiting so that you can see any error messages that go by. : % : % I changed the editor setting

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread David T-G
Marc -- ...and then Marc van Dongen said... % David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: % % [snip] % % : % : quickie script which calls vim and then waits for a keypress before % : % % : % I changed the editor setting to a script that prints something, % : % reads a line and then starts to edit.

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Marc van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000: I changed the editor setting to a script that prints something, reads a line and then starts to edit. It doesn't seem to be called when I press `e.' I still get the `unmodified' message. What doesn't get called when you press e, the

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Marc van Dongen
Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : Marc van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000: : I changed the editor setting to a script that prints something, : reads a line and then starts to edit. It doesn't seem to be : called when I press `e.' I still get the `unmodified'

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Marc van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000: : !/path/to/your/editor/here Good one. I hadn't thought of trying that. It fails Other shell commands fail as well Well, that's the "reason" then why your editor isn't getting called. I have no idea why you couldn't run

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Marc van Dongen
Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] : Good one. I hadn't thought of trying that. It fails : Other shell commands fail as well [snip] : I have no idea why you couldn't run any commands from within Mutt : though, I've never heard of this kind of problem. Can you even :

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Marc van Dongen proclaimed on mutt-users that: Maybe this is an operating system related problem. I am using the CDE desktop at the moment but the problem also manifests itself if I use the openwindows desktop. Get out of both desktops into the sun shell... try mutt there. -- Suresh

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Marc van Dongen
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : Get out of both desktops into the sun shell... try mutt there. No success either:-( Regards, Marc van Dongen

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Bruce DeVisser
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 04:09:04PM +0100, Marc van Dongen wrote: Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : Get out of both desktops into the sun shell... try mutt there. No success either:-( And what does :set ?shell return? -- - Bruce

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Marc van Dongen
Bruce DeVisser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : And what does :set ?shell return? shell="/usr/bin/bash" which is correct. Regards, Marc van Dongen

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Morten Liebach
On 27, Sep, 2000 at 01:36:46PM +0100, Marc van Dongen wrote: David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] : % : If you can't figure out what's up, try setting mutt's $editor to a : % : quickie script which calls vim and then waits for a keypress before : % : exiting so that you can see

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread David T-G
Marc -- ...and then Marc van Dongen said... % Bruce DeVisser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: % % : And what does :set ?shell return? % % shell="/usr/bin/bash" % % which is correct. It may be correct, but it isn't stock :-) Try settin $shell to /sbin/sh, which is guaranteed to be completely

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Marc van Dongen
Morten Liebach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] : This _is_ a long shot, but: what happens when you try to invoke vim from : your shell? It works great! [snip] Regards, Marc van Dongen

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Marc van Dongen
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : It may be correct, but it isn't stock :-) Try settin $shell to /sbin/sh, : which is guaranteed to be completely self-contained. If *that* works, I am assuming you are asking me to write a wrapper script around mutt to set the shell. That didn't work.

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Marc van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000: Bruce DeVisser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : And what does :set ?shell return? shell="/usr/bin/bash" which is correct. OK.. And you can get a shell (via a terminal window), so you know the binary is executable etc.?

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Bruce DeVisser
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:57:14PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: I don't know the exact details (haven't looked at the source), but I would guess that the way Mutt starts an external program is with the system() sytem-function-call. If your Mutt can't run programs this way, then something is

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Marc van Dongen
Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : OK.. And you can get a shell (via a terminal window), so you know the : binary is executable etc.? I am not exactly sure what you mean. External programs, like knews can start vim as an external program to compose an email message. [snip] : Like

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread David T-G
Marc -- ...and then Marc van Dongen said... % David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: % % : It may be correct, but it isn't stock :-) Try settin $shell to /sbin/sh, % : which is guaranteed to be completely self-contained. If *that* works, % % I am assuming you are asking me to write a wrapper

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 22:57:14 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: I don't know the exact details (haven't looked at the source), but I would guess that the way Mutt starts an external program is with the system() sytem-function-call. Mutt has its own implementaion of system() to have better

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-27 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 22:57 +0300 27 Sep 2000, Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For Sun, I don't know what the system call trace program is called -- truss maybe, or was that some other OS? It may not have one (installed). truss is correct. I'd probably use: truss -o /tmp/mutt.truss -f -t exec mutt

Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-26 Thread Marc van Dongen
Hi there, I just re-installed vim on my system. When I now try to compose a message after I enter the name of the recipient mutt does not allow me to write a message. Istead it displays a Aborted unmodified message. message. Any suggestions how to overcome this problem? Thanks in advance

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-09-26 Thread David Champion
Aborted unmodified message. message. set abort_unmodified=ask-no Wow, two questions in a row I'm dealing with as they roll in. -- -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago

Aborted unmodified message.

2000-07-05 Thread User Jasapp
line, and hit enter. Then it just says, "Aborted unmodified message.". I can send mail using other muas just fine, and I've checked all ther permissions. Can someone help me out? Jeff (Please reply directly, I'm not on the list)

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-07-05 Thread Mikko Hänninen
User Jasapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 05 Jul 2000: First, I hit "m", for new mail, then type in the address on the "to:" line, and hit enter. Then it just says, "Aborted unmodified message.". Sounds like the execution of your editor fails. That is, aft

Re: Aborted unmodified message.

2000-07-05 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
User Jasapp proclaimed on mutt-users that: First, I hit "m", for new mail, then type in the address on the "to:" line, and hit enter. Then it just says, "Aborted unmodified message.". I can send mail using other muas just fine, and I've checked all ther permissions