Hi.
Have anyone heard about encpipe https://github.com/jedisct1/encpipe.git or
minisign https://jedisct1.github.io/minisign/ .
As gpg is so deeply integrated into mutt I would like to know if the community
is interested to add another tool for signing and encrypting?
Best regards
Aleks
On 04.05.16 15:51, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> +1 requesting this feature:
>
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/47773/rebinding-clear-prompt-in-mutt
Yes, that would be wonderful. The ^G aberration is a mindbender.
> All command line Unix-like system applications should support vi
+1 requesting this feature:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/47773/rebinding-clear-prompt-in-mutt
All command line Unix-like system applications should support vi as well
as emacs key bindings.
Walter
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 09:47:23PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
On 21.06.13 10:52, Eduardo Alvarez wrote:
That sounds like a fantastic compilation, not just for practical knowledge,
but
I'm betting a little of history as well. Would you care to share it? :)
At first I thought that's
On 21.06.13 10:52, Eduardo Alvarez wrote:
That sounds like a fantastic compilation, not just for practical knowledge,
but
I'm betting a little of history as well. Would you care to share it? :)
At first I thought that's not a problem, if it is of any interest. But
it includes pastes of
On 27.10.11 15:27, David Champion wrote:
* On 27 Oct 2011, Jostein Gogstad wrote:
Anyone heard of a script that does something similar? Do you think it falls
under the responsibility of the MUA?
I think that sounds like a task management / trouble-ticketing system.
Typically a reply
One of the nicer plugins to Gmail (and MS Outlook) is boomerang [1]. It solves
the following scenario:
I'm sending a mail to Bob asking him to perform some task. I expect his
response before the work day is over. It's important that I remind him of this
task if he doesn't answer my mail in the
* On 27 Oct 2011, Jostein Gogstad wrote:
Anyone heard of a script that does something similar? Do you think it falls
under the responsibility of the MUA?
I think that sounds like a task management / trouble-ticketing system.
Typically a reply to an e-mail is not the exact result I'm looking
=- Jostein Gogstad wrote on Thu 27.Oct'11 at 22:06:54 +0200 -=
I'm sending a mail to Bob asking him to perform some task. I
expect his response before the work day is over. It's important
that I remind him of this task if he doesn't answer my mail in the
next 8 hours.
Anyone heard of a
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:06:54PM +0200, Jostein Gogstad wrote:
I'm sending a mail to Bob asking him to perform some task. I expect his
response before the work day is over. It's important that I remind him of this
task if he doesn't answer my mail in the next 8 hours.
You could do this with
unsubscribe
=- Michelle Konzack wrote on Sun 18.May'08 at 0:06:56 +0200 -=
This would simplify things, because currently if I use
mutt -F ~/.mutt_bts/muttrc
I have to specify ALL files I source with the FULL PATH which mess
up things since some files are only copies from other configs and
I
Hi,
* Rado S wrote:
=- Michelle Konzack wrote on Sun 18.May'08 at 0:06:56 +0200 -=
This would simplify things, because currently if I use
mutt -F ~/.mutt_bts/muttrc
I have to specify ALL files I source with the FULL PATH which mess
up things since some files are only copies from
Hello,
Since I am developer and my mailinglist/bts subscriptions explode I like
to separate the stuff. Unfortunately I have already over 200 config
files in my ~/.mutt/ directory.
I know I can use
mutt -F ~/.mutt/muttrc_std
mutt -F ~/.mutt/muttrc_bts
mutt -F ~/.mutt/muttrc_ml
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
a few seconds ago, I wanted to re-subscribe under a different name on
http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
A thing I did not like there was the way how you offer the different
mailing lists: You offer them as radio-buttons instead
Steve,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Steve Kennedy wrote:
The idea was that you should only sub to the main list or the
digest list (i.e. either/or) which is why radio buttons are used.
That's clear. But what if I want to sub to several list at the same
time and then change my mind.
it doesn't
Hi,
* Steve Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-10-14 13:36]:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
a few seconds ago, I wanted to re-subscribe under a different name on
http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
A thing I did not like there was the way how you offer the different
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:50:52PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote:
Hi,
* Steve Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-10-14 13:36]:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
a few seconds ago, I wanted to re-subscribe under a different name on
http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
Thomas,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote:
I recall seeing some comments to the effect that some non-compliant browsers
allow one to submit a form with no radio buttons checked.
at least my mozilla 1.0 running on a Linux 2.4.18 box started with no
buttons checked ,-)
wbr,
--
Folks,
a few seconds ago, I wanted to re-subscribe under a different name on
http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
A thing I did not like there was the way how you offer the different
mailing lists: You offer them as radio-buttons instead of checkboxes.
Why? Using mozilla 1.0, I was not
Hi,
* Chris Green [02-10-11 13:38:49 +0200] wrote:
1 Does save-hook *only* allow changing the name of the
mbox to save to rather than the 'any command' that other
hooks allow?
Yes.
If so then I'd like a new hook of some sort that allows
me to perform some arbitrary action when
the problem partly but then I need an answer to my
second request - how can I tell $youraction the path and filename
where save-message saves my message?
That comes after ``save-message'' because it'll leed to a
the usual prompt. You can either type it or do something
like:
macro
Hi,
* Chris Green [02-10-11 14:15:06 +0200] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:41:18PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
[...]
Use a macro to ``redefine'' saving:
macro pager s push '$youractionsave-message'
OK, that solves the problem partly but then I need an answer to my
second request
*whenever* a message is saved.
Use a macro to ``redefine'' saving:
macro pager s push '$youractionsave-message'
OK, that solves the problem partly but then I need an answer to my
second request - how can I tell $youraction the path and filename
where save-message saves my message
I have two facilities that I would like in mutt which don't seem to be
there:-
1 Does save-hook *only* allow changing the name of the mbox to save to
rather than the 'any command' that other hooks allow? If so then
I'd like a new hook of some sort that allows me to perform some
arbitrary
.. like save_name but mutt resolves `bar' from foo.bar.com
Some suggested hacks for this but IMHO, this is sufficicently
useful (especially for those who deal with many companies /
organisations) to be native functionality.
--
Eric Smith [hoping]
* Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-01 10:18]:
Some suggested hacks for this but IMHO, this is sufficicently
useful (especially for those who deal with many companies /
organisations) to be native functionality.
This seems like a good learning excersize, so I was looking into this,
trying
Hi.
Just minor addition, else, I think this has been discussed quite
thourougly now.
On Sat 2002-07-06 at 11:07:53 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 23:56:08 +0200] wrote:
On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
I misunderstood him (completely) but
Hi,
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 23:56:08 +0200] wrote:
On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 00:44:50 +0200] wrote:
[...]
I misunderstood him (completely) but one may specify a
limit pattern to show only the mails of one
Hi.
On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 00:44:50 +0200] wrote:
[...]
I misunderstood him (completely) but one may specify a limit
pattern to show only the mails of one correspondence.
How?
I do not think so. The work to do would not be
* Vincent Lefevre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020701 08:47]:
And using push doesn't work correctly with IMAP folders because
the corresponding characters are sent as password characters (for
security reasons, I don't store my password on my account, though
I could change my mind later).
If you're
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 00:20:17 -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
If you're not using SSH or SSL for your IMAP anyway, it's no less safe
[...]
On the internal network, we have the choice between using SSL or not
(and it's regarded as safe as it's on the internal network, though
I prefer to use SSL
. (=mbox,mutt is the in-coming one, =mlist/mutt is for saving
the mail I'd like to keep.)
Request:
Is it possible to have a cross-mbox-threading function as following:
1. A variable, say ref-mboxes (Type: string, default: =mbox:=outbox),
to specify related mboxes to reference. The mailbox in front
I'd like to have aliases for mailboxes. Well, I suppose I could define
a spurious address with the wanted alias so that I could use the @alias
form. But it would be better if there was a cleaner way. And this alias
should be displayed instead of the full name with %f in $status_format.
Then, how
* Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-01 08:32:05 +0200]:
Then, how about being able to do internal filtering? For instance, using
mailboxes the_mailbox#pattern1
mailboxes the_mailbox#pattern2
mailboxes the_mailbox#pattern3
mailboxes the_mailbox#pattern4
When opening the
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 14:58:03 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
I've been doing this sort of thing for a long time using links in
the filesystem and mutt's `folder-hook'.
See URL:http://www.davep.org/mutt/muttrc/folder-hooks.html and
look at the last set of hooks.
This is not exactly what I
* Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-10 14:22]:
Being able to color and uncolor patterns
in the pager would be a good solution.
yes - an uncolor command is definitely missing.
i keep finding this when testing new color patterns.
you'll know once you enter a pattern
like ^ or . with a
* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-10 14:52:24 +0200]:
So far so good. Currently it is impossible to remove that pattern
again. uncolor only works in the index.
Devellopers, any chance to change that?
Once again I'd like to add my voice this feature. I see how you
people are...I
* Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-10 10:22]:
[-- snip --]
That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself.
I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I
highlight the section headings like this:
display-hook '~s blips' 'push
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself.
I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I
highlight the section headings like this:
display-hook '~s blips' 'push
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
Where does display-hook come from? I just built 1.3.28 and use
1.3.22.1 regularly and neither has it. I'm assuming it comes from a
patch, but which one?
It was a patch for the 1.2 series. I'm using
* Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-11 12:02]:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself.
I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I
highlight the section headings like
Hi all,
I just played around with my color setup. I found that it's sometimes
usefull to hightlight numbers in the body of a message to find a phone
number and the like. Now, I want to do that only on demand.
macro pager f5 exitenter-commandcolor body [0-9]enterdisplay-message
So far so good.
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% Hi all,
Hello!
%
% I just played around with my color setup. I found that it's sometimes
% usefull to hightlight numbers in the body of a message to find a phone
Sure; that makes sense.
% number and the like. Now, I want to do that only on
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
...and then Michael Tatge said...
% macro pager f5 exitenter-commandcolor body [0-9]enterdisplay-message
%
What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
No. This would color each and every -, / and ., too. But
([0-9]+[\.:/-]*)* would
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% ...and then Michael Tatge said...
% % macro pager f5 exitenter-commandcolor body [0-9]enterdisplay-message
% %
%
% What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
%
% No. This would
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:06:02PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
...and then Michael Tatge said...
% macro pager f5 exitenter-commandcolor body [0-9]enterdisplay-message
%
What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
No. This
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
^^
% ([0-9]+[\.:/-]*)* would do for most numbers, phones, dates and times.
% Only I cannot turn it
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% ...and then Michael Tatge said...
...
%
% % Only I cannot turn it off, which sucks.
%
% What's to turn off?
%
% Right, you're talking about seraching not coloring, which I missed the
Ah. Right.
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:39:43AM +0200:
feature request denied.
macro index c change-folder!
That breaks ? for list functionality. It would be better to assign
it to another key:
macro index I change-folder!\r
Then get used to using I when you
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-04-02 08:22]:
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:39:43AM +0200:
feature request denied.
macro index c change-folder!
That breaks ? for list functionality. It would be better to assign
it to another key:
macro
Feature request. It would be nice and timesaving (for me, at least) if
change-folder would default to ! when where was not a folder
containing New Mail. Perhaps a set feature in muttrc ??
set change-folder some-default-location
Just a thought.
--
Pat Shanahan Registered Linux
* pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-03 19:48]:
Feature request. It would be nice and timesaving (for me, at least)
if change-folder would default to ! when where was not a folder
containing New Mail. Perhaps a set feature in muttrc ??
set change-folder some-default-location
feature request
Sven Guckes wrote:
* pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-03 19:48]:
Feature request. It would be nice and timesaving (for me, at least)
if change-folder would default to ! when where was not a folder
containing New Mail. Perhaps a set feature in muttrc ??
set change-folder some-default
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-03-02 19:50]:
* pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-03 19:48]:
Feature request. It would be nice and timesaving (for me, at
PS: But, dammit, Pat, put your name into the
From: line so an attribution makes sense!
Sven
Just for you, Sven.
aka patrick
I'm not sure I used the correct terminology in the Subject: line, but
what I'm looking for is pretty easy to explain (hopefully easy to
implement also :p) Basically, this is what we have now:
auto_view image/tiff
This line tells mutt to consult $mailcap_path and find a mailcap entry
that
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:30:53AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
After reading Cliff's post and mutt's manual, I am not sure whether
Disposition-Notification-To: will do what I want.
I've read all the other arguments about whether read-receipts are a
good thing. Whether they are or not they are
Chris --
...and then Chris Gentle said...
%
% On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:30:53AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
%
% After reading Cliff's post and mutt's manual, I am not sure whether
% Disposition-Notification-To: will do what I want.
%
% I've read all the other arguments about whether
Hi, Erika,
It looks your postman is specailly friendly to you and you never have to
sign a receipt for a registered snail mail. (Or you just reject them
all. :)
I think such function or mechanism USEFUL because some people, including
me, need it from time to time.
And I believe most of people
[03.01.02 11:30 +0800] Charles Jie -- :
What I want to get is the RECIPIENT's answering (eg. thru a dialog box),
not of the system.
The value of this mechanism is that the recipient is automatically
prompted for a receipt, and I can get noticed as soon as possible when
he/she is back or
Hello Cliff,
On Wednesday, January 2, 2002 at 3:18:21 PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Put this line in your muttrc to always request for receipt:
my_hdr Disposition-Notification-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The MTA's involved have to understand this, all of them along the way
if I recall
On Thursday, January 3, 2002 at 11:30:53 AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
After reading Cliff's post and mutt's manual, I am not sure whether
Disposition-Notification-To: will do what I want.
It will. Exactly as the « request read receipt for all outgoing
mails » option in tools/options
Hello Charles, hello ALL, and happy new year for everyone!
I'm new in this list, and not really fluent in english, sorry. But
it's a good day to begin. :-)
On Monday, December 31, 2001 at 11:15:10 AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
I was able to request for receipt in my mail while using
wrote:
I was able to request for receipt in my mail while using Outlook
Express or Netscape. But how to do it in Mutt?
Put this line in your muttrc to always request for receipt:
my_hdr Disposition-Notification-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or just insert the field into header while
Frankly it is a diabolical practise, causes uneccessary and pointless
mail. If a mail is so important that you *must* be certain it has been
read then phone the person up. Since the mechanism is inherently
unreliable anyway, what is the point of using it ?
Exactly. Every now and then, I
or available - avoiding many calls in vain.
many thanks,
charlie
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 09:05:40PM +0100, Alain Bench wrote:
Put this line in your muttrc to always request for receipt:
my_hdr Disposition-Notification-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was able to request for receipt in my mail while using Outlook Express
or Netscape.
But how to do it in Mutt? Thanks.
charlie
--
Charles Jie (¬ö¬K¿³) Keya Technologies (¶}¶®¬ì§Þ)
(O) +886 2 2936 0813 (Mobile) 0920 397 746
Alexander, et al --
...and then Alexander V. Konstantinou said...
% % Right now I've achieved this functionality through a wrapper shell
% % script that greps for the alias name and invokes mutt with the real
% % user name.
%
% That makes sense, though it sounds somewhat painful.
%
% It
Alexander --
...and then Alexander V. Konstantinou said...
% As far as I can tell, mutt does not support openning the folder of
% a user based on an alias. For example, consider user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% that is aliased as foo.
Yep.
%
% I'd like to be able to open the folder using mutt -f
% Right now I've achieved this functionality through a wrapper shell
% script that greps for the alias name and invokes mutt with the real
% user name.
That makes sense, though it sounds somewhat painful.
It is not really painful, or slow for that matter on my machine ...
Here is my quick
As far as I can tell, mutt does not support openning the folder of
a user based on an alias. For example, consider user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that is aliased as foo.
I'd like to be able to open the folder using mutt -f =foo (perhaps
using some other symbol than '=').
Right now I've achieved this
* Will Yadley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010807 19:38]:
change this line
print \033]0;$line\007];
to this:
print \033]0;$line\007;
? It's entirely untested, but my first impulse on looking at it was why
is there an extra right-bracket there?
--
Vineet
i had a little luck with this patch:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mutt-users@mutt.org/msg15187.html
but there are a few picky little things. since i have little perl and no c
experience i could use some help :
for some reason the patch didn't apply happily even though the code looks
similar
Thanks!
Erwin
Mutt is great!
Two features I'd like to propose:
1. The screen should be cleared at termination.
2. Often I get mail with a lot of adresses in the Cc: field which
I'd like to take into my alias list. So: Could the taking alias
feature be expanded to other entries and mulpiple entries?
Thanks to
Erwin Kaiser writes:
Mutt is great!
Two features I'd like to propose:
1. The screen should be cleared at termination.
This is a feature of the terminal emulator you are running.
This is the reason why I replaced the xterm terminfo entry
on my Solaris box with the X11R6 xterm definition
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Erwin Kaiser wrote:
2. Often I get mail with a lot of adresses in the Cc: field which
I'd like to take into my alias list. So: Could the taking alias
feature be expanded to other entries and mulpiple entries?
see
Mutt doesnt ask for it - and postfix / exim / qmail dont implement DSN at all
Postfix now supports DNS:
Major changes with snapshot-2924
DSN formatted bounced/delayed mail notifications, finally. The
human-readable
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 02:52:01PM -0700, Monte Milanuk wrote:
I highly recommend the script 'install-sendmail' available at:
http://cork.linux.ie/projects/install-sendmail/
Well, it may be wonderfull, but it didn't work for me -- I really, do
not remember, what was the problem. But
oddities. Meanwhile, Fetchmail, which actually exists to fit this role,
works to actually address all these things, and if you want to pop mail to
your machine from a remote account, something like this still makes the
most sense to use. If you don't like Fetchmail, you can use one of the
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:27:44PM -0400, William Park wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:04:18PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2001-05-16 16:39:32 -0400, Mr. Wade wrote:
Mutt also has a built-in editor, crappy or otherwise, not that I
make a habit of using it very often. unset
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 06:35:24AM +0200, Thomas Roessler
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 2001-05-16 20:22:09 -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote:
You'd be surprised. Use mutt with -x is a standard answer to the
(increasingly common) question, How can I send mail with an
attachment from my
On Wed, 16 May 2001 12:54:05 -0400 Mike Schiraldi wrote:
Mutt needs mindshare. Otherwise we all lose. Some day you'll wake up and
mutt won't be able to read mail cause 99% of the world is using
proprietary MS|Sun|Oracle|Whatever extensions.
The best protection against all those extensions
Brendan Cully wrote:
IMAP always gets dragged into this, and it's a red herring. Fetchmail
cannot fully replace the functionality of mutt's IMAP code, and
neither can any other tool. IMAP is a mailbox driver, and as such is
the province of the MUA.
What confuses me about fetchmail is that if
* On [010517 19:15] Mike Schiraldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, i'm sick of using external encryption suites like GPG. I think mutt
should absorb all their functionality. And all those external apps in
.mailcap, too. And i'm sick of having to install Unix before i can use
mutt. mutt is
Brendan Cully [mutt-users] Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:20:20PM -0400:
nail. I've talked to him about IMAP and seen him trying to read his
mail on the road, and at least a couple of years ago he didn't
really seem to understand what IMAP was for. Probably had something
to do with the
On 2001-05-16 11:45 +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
Purists and
Cassandras that cry out each time a user asks for SMTP delivery in mutt
are out of touch.
No they're not. They're very much in touch with what they need
and want.
Mutt should be accessible out of the box. It should work
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:45:51AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
Seriously, installing, configuring, running, administering a simple MTA
like ssmtp may be not much to ask but it's still another piece of
software to deal with, concepts to master, docs to read, precious time
people don't
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:40:33PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
Then you would better serve your agenda by contributing to that
project than by lobbying for Mutt to bend in that direction. If
you want to work on an SMTP-aware MUA, more power to you. But
don't make Mutt users pay for something
On Wed, May 16, 2001, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
You're going to add an MTA first (reimplement sendmail). Then
Huh? Adding a few dozen lines of code to deliver via SMTP is
reimplementing sendmail? You need a serious reality check.
a few dozen lines of code... Did you ever write a SMTP
is a good replacement, but
has to be configured by root.
Notice that it isn't a request, but only an thought. And notice also that my
example come from a real life situaton, where a 'courageous' user in a NT
environment use linux, with sysadmins having no time to bother with that
singularity, but also
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:01:16PM +0200, Dumas Patrice wrote:
When users haven't root privileges, it isn't possible to configure
any MTA I know. Maybe there exits such a MTA, but I don't know it.
sendmail may be invoked from the command line by any user. In fact,
you can use it in place of a
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:11:46PM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
* On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:50:45PM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
Sorry, but _IMHO_ a person not willing to install / use a MTA separat
from Mutt will not use mutt either. He want to use some software with
a
On 2001-05-16 19:31 +0530, Biju Chacko wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:40:33PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
But don't make Mutt users pay for something they won't use.
While I agree with the need to keep one's MUAs and MTAs seperate, I find your
argument flawed. There are literally dozens
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:50:34PM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
* On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:54:01AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
You're going to add an MTA first (reimplement sendmail). Then
Huh?
On Wed, May 16, 2001, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
Yes, telling the user try later or postpone your message and fix your
config is better than injecting the message into a poorly configured
/usr/sbin/sendail that will drop it on the floor without reporting it.
What a great alternative...
Biju Chacko proclaimed on mutt-users that:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:40:33PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
Then you would better serve your agenda by contributing to that
project than by lobbying for Mutt to bend in that direction. If
you want to work on an SMTP-aware MUA, more power to
On 2001-05-16 17:01:16 +0200, Dumas Patrice wrote:
It is my opinion, and I am not a sysadmin, but if I were ;-), I
wouldn't like sendmail or even postfix to be installed on
workstations, as I think it is bad and unusefull in a classical
LAN architecture. sSMTP is a good replacement, but has
Some people wrote:
Sorry, but Unix is built out of tools. Use them (or use Emacs, which
has everything built in).
You mean mutt should be like emacs and have everything built-in?
Not to start another flamewar, but emacs doesn't have everything
built-in. Rather, functionality is extended
On 2001-05-16 23:31:03 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Pine for instance? It normally delivers to local sendmail, but
will happily deliver to an external delivery server (using
sendmail -bs and talking smtp)
Pine also includes a crappy editor (pico - which is nevertheless
used by some
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
