compiling mutt 1.5.19 on Solaris 10: iconv errors

2009-04-12 Thread June Qiu
Hi, I can't figure out why I have the following errors when I am using libiconv 1.12. Pls help!   : checking iconv.h usability... yes checking iconv.h presence... yes checking for iconv.h... yes checking whether iconv.h defines iconv_t... yes checking whether this iconv is good enough

Re: compiling mutt 1.5.19 on Solaris 10: iconv errors

2009-04-12 Thread Kyle Wheeler
whether iconv.h defines iconv_t... yes checking whether this iconv is good enough... no configure: error: Try using libiconv instead The exact compilation details will be in your config.log file (you probably aren't actually *using* the libiconv you installed). Essentially, that is good enough

Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved

2002-10-15 Thread Alain Bench
Hello Sven, On Sunday, October 13, 2002 at 12:52:14 AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: this iconv stuff just doesn't work on solaris. I don't understand the problem: Quick scanning your mails here since July shows you sometimes quote and write accented chars correctly, and sometimes not. Noted

Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved

2002-10-14 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.10.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Sven Dogbert Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so - what *is* required then? I don't know: I install Solaris (with all the language options), I compile mutt. Mutt works. well - +HAVE_ICONV, for sure. but is +ICONV_NONTRANS? what? I don't know.

RE: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved

2002-10-14 Thread John Haviland
Of David Champion Sent: Tuesday, 15 October 2002 02:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved * On 2002.10.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Sven Dogbert Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so - what *is* required then? I don't know: I install Solaris (with all

Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved

2002-10-13 Thread Sven Guckes
* René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-12 16:46]: * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11-10-2002 20:25]: [all context] * Ren Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-11 16:01]: ^^ This grieves me, Sven... sorry, man. this iconv stuff just doesn't work on solaris. i downloaded the latest

Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved

2002-10-13 Thread Sven Guckes
* Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-12 23:04]: On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: and installed it, recompiled mutt --with-iconv=$HOME - it can be. I have like you experiences with mutt, iconv, Solaris 7, gcc 3.2 and gnumake so that makes two of us. well, i suppose i might

Re: iconv stuff on solaris still unresolved

2002-10-13 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.10.12, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Sven Dogbert Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so - is anyone using mutt 1.4 with iconv on solaris successfully? mind you - i am not root, so all my stuff resides in my $HOME. I'm using 1.5.1 on Solaris, and before that I used 1.3.x on Solaris

compile errors on macosx and disable-iconv

2002-09-13 Thread Eugene Lee
I'm having problems compiling mutt-1.4i on Mac OS X 10.2. I already discovered that --without-iconv doesn't work and have applied Lars' patch-1.4.lh.noiconv.1 patch (it says patch.1.3.28.lh.noiconv in the patched ChangeLog) that added --disable-iconv. BTW, the patched ChangeLog also says no m4

Re: compile errors on macosx and disable-iconv

2002-09-13 Thread Eugene Lee
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 02:19:49AM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote: : : I'm having problems compiling mutt-1.4i on Mac OS X 10.2. I already : discovered that --without-iconv doesn't work and have applied Lars' : patch-1.4.lh.noiconv.1 patch (it says patch.1.3.28.lh.noiconv in the : patched ChangeLog

--with-iconv?

2002-06-15 Thread Ken Weingold
I just built 1.4 just fine, but am curious about something. I used --with-iconv in configure, and it didn't find everything it needed, and make failed. Using --with-libiconv worked as it did in all the 1.3.x I have built. The reason I used --with-iconv was because that is the only reference

Weird bug while compiling 1.4i with iconv 1.8

2002-06-02 Thread Eugene Paskevich
Hi, everybody! While running configure script it finds iconv.h Determines that type iconv_t is defined. But never finds declaration for iconv function... libiconv from ftp.gnu.org was installed ok. Gettext from the same place compiled great with libiconv. BTW There was no internal system

Re: charset-hook / iconv-hook

2002-05-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2002-05-31 10:22:56 +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: Now, I don't really understand why charset-hooks are being used AT ALL for sending messages, now that iconv-hook is available, so I am suggesting the attached patch, hoping that people who use charset-hook can tell me if it makes

Re: 1.3.28: still not possible to compile without iconv

2002-03-18 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Claus Assmann said on Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 04:02:53PM -0800: I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that this should be fixed / will be looking into it. However, 1.3.28 still can't be configured without iconv. Any chance for a change? Pardon my

Re: 1.3.28: still not possible to compile without iconv

2002-03-18 Thread David T-G
without iconv. Any chance for a change? % % Pardon my ignorance, but why would you want to? It's not that he wants to; it's that it has the problem. He does not have iconv and thus can't get his mutt to play. :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play

1.3.28: still not possible to compile without iconv

2002-03-17 Thread Claus Assmann
I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that this should be fixed / will be looking into it. However, 1.3.28 still can't be configured without iconv. Any chance for a change? I've attached a patch that seems to work. It's a bit of hack, a clean solution would be to have

Re: 1.3.28: still not possible to compile without iconv

2002-03-17 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.03.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that this should be fixed / will be looking into it. However, 1.3.28 still can't be configured without iconv. Any chance for a change? Lars

Re: 1.3.28: still not possible to compile without iconv

2002-03-17 Thread Claus Assmann
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002, David Champion wrote: * On 2002.03.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Claus Assmann wrote: I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that this should be fixed / will be looking into it. However, 1.3.28 still can't be configured without iconv. Any

Re: 1.3.28: still not possible to compile without iconv

2002-03-17 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.03.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (sorry, I don't read mutt-dev anymore, I'm getting more than 500 mails a day (obviously I can only skim through the subjects and read only a subset...)) Lars doesn't read mutt-users anymore for the same

Fwd: [Patch] 1.3.x without iconv

2002-02-12 Thread Jeremy Blosser
There have been various comments here by people attempting to move from the 1.2.x tree to the 1.3.x tree about the new iconv requirement, and the fact that the --without-libiconv option documented in INSTALL does not actually work. Lars Hecking posted the attached message patch to mutt-dev

Iconv question

2002-01-31 Thread Mark J. Reed
I just built and installed Mutt 1.3.27i. I have iconv in my C library with all MIME character set names supported. I'm running mutt in a UTF-8 xterm with my LC_* variables all set to en_US.utf8. Given this setup and the new iconv support, my expectation was that when I displayed a Latin-1

--without-iconv doesn't work?

2002-01-02 Thread Claus Assmann
System: OpenBSD 2.8 ./configure --without-iconv doesn't work: checking for catalogs to be installed... de ru it es uk fr pl nl cs id sk ko el zh_TW zh_CN pt_BR eo gl sv da lt tr ja hu et ca configure: error: Unable to find an iconv function. See INSTALL for help I read the INSTALL file, that's

Re: --without-iconv doesn't work?

2002-01-02 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
This is annoying. I've successfully compiled mutt without iconv by commenting out lines in config.h, so I think that this is just a braindead policy decision. Try commenting out the iconv test you quoted below in configure, and see what happens when you configure and build without iconv. Also

Re: --without-iconv doesn't work?

2002-01-02 Thread Lars Hecking
without iconv. Also note that for some reason the iconv macro is defined twice in config.h: perhaps one of them is hardwired. So make The reason is that the definition in acconfig.h is superfluous. At a glance, it seems that about 20 definitions in acconfig.h are superfluous. (See

Re: --without-iconv doesn't work?

2002-01-02 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:20:14AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote: System: OpenBSD 2.8 ./configure --without-iconv doesn't work: checking for catalogs to be installed... de ru it es uk fr pl nl cs id sk ko el zh_TW zh_CN pt_BR eo gl sv da lt tr ja hu et ca configure: error: Unable to find

Re: --without-iconv doesn't work?

2002-01-02 Thread Claus Assmann
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: This is annoying. I've successfully compiled mutt without iconv by commenting out lines in config.h, so I think that this is just a braindead policy decision. Try commenting out the iconv test you quoted below in configure, and see what happens

Re: --without-iconv doesn't work?

2002-01-02 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:29:08AM -0800, Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2002, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: This is annoying. I've successfully compiled mutt without iconv by commenting out lines in config.h, so I think that this is just a braindead policy decision. Try

Re: --without-iconv doesn't work?

2002-01-02 Thread Lars Hecking
Claus Assmann writes: System: OpenBSD 2.8 ./configure --without-iconv doesn't work: The documentation in INSTALL is wrong. There is no --without-iconv configure option, and configure does the right thing by bombing out. I think this can be fixed, though :)

Re: Problems with 1.3.22's iconv/libiconv

2001-09-25 Thread Jean-Sebastien Morisset
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:37:02PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: i don't know too much about this, but i was able to get over thie problem with some help from some developers on this list. i had to export LDFLAGS to something; in my case, this

Problems with 1.3.22's iconv/libiconv

2001-09-24 Thread Jean-Sebastien Morisset
Here's my configure: ./configure \ --prefix=/opt/mutt-1.3.22 \ --enable-pop --enable-imap \ --with-curses=/opt/ncurses \ --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/libiconv \ --with-debug And the output: [snip!] checking for iconv... yes checking for iconv declaration

Re: Problems with 1.3.22's iconv/libiconv

2001-09-24 Thread Will Yardley
Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote: checking whether this iconv is good enough... no configure: error: Try using libiconv instead i don't know too much about this, but i was able to get over thie problem with some help from some developers on this list. i had to export LDFLAGS to something; in my

Re: Problems with 1.3.22's iconv/libiconv

2001-09-24 Thread David T-G
Jean-Sebastien -- ...and then Jean-Sebastien Morisset said... % ... % BTW, anyone know where I can find the pgp-outlook patch for v1.3.22? See http://mutt.sector13.org/mutt-build-cocktail for one... % % Thanks, % js. % -- % Jean-Sebastien Morisset, Sr. UNIX Administrator [EMAIL

iconv

2001-09-08 Thread alexus
another thing about iconv in INSTALL it says go to http://clisp.cons.org/~haible/packages-libiconv.html but i get 404 when i go to that webpage

Re: iconv

2001-09-08 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
alexus mutt [06/09/01 18:37 -0400]: another thing about iconv in INSTALL it says go to http://clisp.cons.org/~haible/packages-libiconv.html but i get 404 when i go to that webpage Search google for (several) other download locations. -suresh

[william+mutt@hq.newdream.net: iconv etc]

2001-09-06 Thread Will Yardley
: Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: iconv etc Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 05:19:41 -0700 User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the actual meessage file: Received

iconv etc

2001-09-05 Thread Will Yardley
Lars Hecking wrote: checking whether this iconv is good enough... no configure: error: Try using libiconv instead Strange - everything else looks correct. We'll need the relevant parts of your config.log, too. ok. i'll include what seems to be relevant in an attached text file. i

Re: iconv etc

2001-09-05 Thread Lars Hecking
configure:6558: checking for iconv configure:6576: gcc -o conftest -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -I/home/will//include -I/home/will/include -L/home/will//lib -L/home/will/lib conftest.c 15 /tmp/cca149331.o: In function `main': /home/will/mutt-1.3.22.1/configure:6570: undefined reference

Re: iconv etc

2001-09-05 Thread Will Yardley
Lars Hecking wrote: configure:6558: checking for iconv configure:6576: gcc -o conftest -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -I/home/will//include -I/home/will/include -L/home/will//lib -L/home/will/lib conftest.c 15 /tmp/cca149331.o: In function `main': /home/will/mutt-1.3.22.1/configure:6570

Re: 1.3.x series need for iconv/libiconv

2000-08-18 Thread Kai Blin
Sitting at the campfire, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told: I take your point about Solaris but it also required libiconv on a RedHat 6.1 system. Debian slink (2.1) also needs it. Kai -- x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x Kai Blin(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: 1.3.x series need for iconv/libiconv

2000-08-17 Thread Martin \[Keso\] Keseg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough. The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux release 6.1. I think this may

Re: 1.3.x series need for iconv/libiconv

2000-08-17 Thread cgreen
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 10:13:37AM +0200, Martin [Keso] Keseg wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough. The two places that needed

Re: 1.3.x series need for iconv/libiconv

2000-08-17 Thread David Champion
On 2000.08.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Martin [Keso] Keseg" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux release 6.1. no, it;s not a problem about development computers, that's a problem of solaris. I was talking a

1.3.x series need for iconv/libiconv

2000-08-16 Thread cgreen
I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough. The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux release 6.1. I think this may cause problems when this gets to a general release