Re: html signature?

2018-03-08 Thread Jude DaShiell
Mar 2018, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 13:02:03 From: Scott Kostyshak <skostys...@ufl.edu> To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: html signature? On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 08:29:47AM +, Thomas Stein wrote: On 2018-03-08 08:47, Yubin Ruan wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 12:4

Re: html signature?

2018-03-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 08:29:47AM +, Thomas Stein wrote: > On 2018-03-08 08:47, Yubin Ruan wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 12:40:26AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I find that one reason that they seem particularly responsive to is > > > to point out that people with disabilities may

Re: html signature?

2018-03-08 Thread Thomas Stein
On 2018-03-08 08:47, Yubin Ruan wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 12:40:26AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: I find that one reason that they seem particularly responsive to is to point out that people with disabilities may have trouble with HTML-only emails. Why? One example: Many visually

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Yubin Ruan
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 12:40:26AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:21:24PM +, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > Sorry, I meant: > > > > In case of real text/plain part (and not only 'click here to read this > > mail' or other suggestions the like) I do READ them. > >

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:21:24PM +, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Sorry, I meant: > > In case of real text/plain part (and not only 'click here to read this > mail' or other suggestions the like) I do READ them. Many of the HTML-only emails come from automated email systems. I usually respond

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:02:50PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2018-03-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:06:12PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> > >> I've noticed that the handling of text/plain by popular GUI MUAs has > >> gotten so bad in past

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, March 07, 2018 a las 08:46:31PM +, Grant Edwards escribió: > >> Do you discard multipart/alternative where there's both text/plain and > >> text/html? That's what I'm leaning towards in the general case. > >> > >> I read this list using slrn via an NNTP server, so that's

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-03-07, Matthias Apitz wrote: > On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 20:13:52 CET, Grant Edwards > wrote: >> On 2018-03-07, Matthias Apitz wrote: >>> >>> I'm used to receive my mails via fetchmail+procmail+mutt and >>> mails in HTML

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Matthias Apitz
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 20:13:52 CET, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2018-03-07, Matthias Apitz wrote: I'm used to receive my mails via fetchmail+procmail+mutt and mails in HTML are in best case silently ignored or end up in SPAM folders. You have

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread José María Mateos
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018, at 14:02, Grant Edwards wrote: > text/plain (which usually assumes an 80-colum display) often renders > especially bad on narrow phone displays. This can be solved using format=flowed e-mail. I used it for a while (it came with a different set of problems) and it was

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-03-07, Matthias Apitz wrote: > On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 19:37:39 CET, Scott Kostyshak > wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:06:12PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: >>> >>> I've noticed that the handling of text/plain by popular GUI MUAs has >>>

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Matthias Apitz
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 19:37:39 CET, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:06:12PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: I've noticed that the handling of text/plain by popular GUI MUAs has gotten so bad in past few years, that I'm now reluctant to send mail in that

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-03-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:06:12PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: >> >> I've noticed that the handling of text/plain by popular GUI MUAs has >> gotten so bad in past few years, that I'm now reluctant to send mail >> in that format. > >

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Tim Chase
On 2018-03-07 13:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> I've noticed that the handling of text/plain by popular GUI MUAs >> has gotten so bad in past few years, that I'm now reluctant to >> send mail in that format. > > What are the most common mistakes? The biggest I've seen is using proportional

Re: html signature?

2018-03-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:06:12PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > > I've noticed that the handling of text/plain by popular GUI MUAs has > gotten so bad in past few years, that I'm now reluctant to send mail > in that format. What are the most common mistakes? I wasn't aware of this situation,

Re: html signature?

2018-03-06 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-03-06, David Young <dyo...@pobox.com> wrote: > Does someone have a recipe for automatically adding an HTML signature > with embedded images to one's email? And is it possible to produce a > hybrid text/plain & text/html email, or do I have to go full HTML? I use

html signature?

2018-03-06 Thread David Young
Does someone have a recipe for automatically adding an HTML signature with embedded images to one's email? And is it possible to produce a hybrid text/plain & text/html email, or do I have to go full HTML? Seems like it *should* be possible with some MIME trickery involving Content-Disposi