of the in house WiFi solution?
Would upping the broadband plan to 1000/1000 fix that problem?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:56 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Mike Hammett s
I think the latency and bps is going to be the best way to measure
broadband everyone can agree on. Is there a better way, sure, but how can
you quantify it?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 7:16 AM
I think it's hilarious when a governmental entity funded by the taxpayers
thinks they have an answer to broadband. If you're collecting funds from
customers, why do you need the City of Sherwood to support your network?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
to the US. Just my opinion and thoughts.
The only "definition of broadband" we get is from the FCC which trickles
down to the states.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 12:14 PM Living
I for one am not part of that goal (water for sure, power second). Not
everyone needs fiber at the massive cost it has.
Signed,
someone deploying rural fiber.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 3:33 AM
Scott,
Are you willing to lend that money interest free?
Are you running that network for $0/mo?
How are you getting free bandwidth?
What are the chances 100% of your customers have 0 problems, pay on time
every day?
That 14 years turns into 30 very quickly.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937
are different.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:40 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 6/2/21 15:25, Josh Luthman wrote:
> > I think going to other countries gets us a different market (ie less
&g
unch
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 10:11 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 6/2/21 15:53, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> "If it was affordable" is a tricky statement. There's no such
Haudy,
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-338708A1.pdf
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:50 PM Haudy Kazemi via NANOG
wrote:
> I'd love to see connection 'Nutrition Facts' type label
cessible. I'm not sure what you mean here.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:39 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 6/2/21 15:26, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> > I for one am not part o
). Did you notice that two of them have filed
bankruptcy recently? They also wrote letters apologizing they didn't
deploy the services they were paid to do.
USF is for phone. Not internet.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
. That
doesn't really have anything to do with upload, I don't know where you got
that.
>As soon a certain threshold is reached, higher speed will not cause more
utilisation of the airwaves.
That's simply not going to happen. Do you think the cell companies stopped
deploying towers, too?
Josh Luthman
CAF/RDOF *requires phone service*. The internet was a happy byproduct.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 3:18 PM heasley wrote:
> Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:02:00PM -0400, Josh Luthman:
> &
those with money find more profitable ways of
doing things - like FTTH in a city with 100 subs/mile.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 5:30 PM heasley wrote:
> Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:25:01PM -0
Baldur,
Mike and I are both doing FTTH. We're listening but it doesn't appear you
are saying anything correct. The statement of 5G taking down all WISPs is
probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard on this list.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne
need 2 (!) splices to do the same work with
GPON.
A) Don't splice the 190 or B) use ribbon and it takes only a few minutes
total.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 12:14 PM Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
>
>
>
GPON is full duplex. Two different wavelengths for the two directions.
1490/1310.
Wireless we'll say you're doing 20 MHz. That doesn't divide up. That's
simply 20 MHz half duplex. With fixed timing (for colocation) it means
that you simply can't shift your ratios.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk
All I'm going to say is at $5/foot for fiber, even if it's 864 count, you
are royally overpaying for material!
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 3:42 AM Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Ju
customer usage:
https://postimg.cc/bZwc6PBx
Please let me know what your data looks like, I would love to compare.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 9:18 AM Jim Troutman
wrote:
> FCC Definit
really want another AT that ends up with all of the
primary last mile technology to all the major cities again?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 9:07 AM Chris Adams (IT)
wrote:
> I’d be interested to u
data.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 12:18 PM wrote:
> Yeah I thought gpon was 2.4 ghz down and 1.2 ghz up... so you could only
> honestly sell (1) 1 gbps symm service via that gpon interface c
Why does it have to be non-US?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:20 AM Livingood, Jason via NANOG
wrote:
> > I think the 10:1 ratio might have been great 5 years ago, when usage was
> more a
that can't deploy
fiber due to extremely high costs of getting through the ground (ie rock)
or aerial (make ready).
802.11ax distances are still limited by 802.11 rules, of which the
distances of a mile or more are not anticipated nor expected.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552
Been months since I was told they'd get it fixed. To be fair they did say
they weren't sure on how long it would take. I feel like I've been
forgotten about.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:18 AM
Have you thought about doing a TCP test? Maybe an HTTP check to a
website? That would be better than ICMP, I think, since it would be more
user like.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:02 PM Eric
What happened on June 20/21? Looks like someone broke something on your
cable link or perhaps an ICMP rate limiting was introduced.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:45 AM Matt Hoppes <
mat
Subjectively speaking, I'm still getting the same amount of spam phone
calls.
I'm certainly getting a lot more spam SMS to my cell. Almost all of them
in my entire life starting July 1...
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
sily.
>
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
>
> --
> *From:* Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Monday, March 29, 2021 2:52:48 PM
> *To:* Christopher Morrow
> *Cc:* Michael K. Spears ; nanog@nanog.org <
> nanog@nanog.org>
> *Subject:* Re:
https://isp.google.com
I signed up for an account there and they said:
"Currently, the Google ISP portal is designed for our partners of GGC, PNI
or IX programs.
The access to portal is granted on request only to our partners."
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 93
Google ISP specifically told me they didn't want to do deal with
geolocation on the ISP portal.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:28 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> As a note, on the ISP por
.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:23 PM Grant Taylor via NANOG
wrote:
> On 3/11/21 2:36 AM, William Guo wrote:
> > but they don't wanna improve it for some reason.
>
> That is both u
of us are entitled to
ours. It doesn't make it wrong.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 2:40 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
> Based on how difficult it is to correct their data for them at no charge,
>
, resolving Google's
geoip, I'm out.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 2:58 PM Grant Taylor via NANOG
wrote:
> On 3/11/21 12:28 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> > Based on how difficult it is to corre
https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 10:08 AM wrote:
> Can anybody tell me how to fix my IP block for google websites and
> youtube/tv becaus
I've had a couple calls over the weekend from customers that got blocked.
Was there any resolution to this or place to contact them? TBW page is
only a link to the forums.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Aug 18
/32 with
complaints they won't be doing any whitelisting on the entire subnet.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 6:41 PM L Sean Kennedy wrote:
> Any other ISPs that are having this issue with Ama
Is this conversation really taking place on NANOG?
Don't backfeed power. Got it. Stupid people are going to be stupid, we
won't solve it here.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:41 AM Mel Beckman
Sent:* Monday, August 23, 2021 11:19 AM
> *To:* Josh Luthman ; Eric C. Miller <
> e...@ericheather.com>
> *Cc:* nanog@nanog.org
> *Subject:* RE: Amazon Prime Video IP reputation
>
>
>
> Geoguard takes care of Amazon and are usually responsive.
>
>
>
> n...@geoguard.com
>
>
>
> *Nathan Gerencser,* *Network Engineer*
> MetaLINK Technologies
>
These guys? https://www.peeringdb.com/net/1264
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 10:34 PM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i am looking for a network engineering/peering contact fr
Do you have any v4 addresses? If so, why don't you do 100% v6 and then
sell your v4 space for some extra cheddar?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 12:04 AM Musa Stephen Honlue
wrote:
> Why don’t
I'm guessing you don't have any v4 to sell? If someone wants to give up
their space of their own free will that's wonderful, but I think most are
opting to sell their resources.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Aug 9
v6 isn't a solution today for v4 problems.
Insults are not productive.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 5:31 PM Ca By wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 1:54 PM Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
&
is to turn left, an
ISP is going to turn left.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:19 AM Blake Hudson wrote:
>
>
> On 10/1/2021 8:48 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> > South Korean Internet serv
Likely a parallel between vacation, ie people not touching things, and
things staying working.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 2:56 PM Job Snijders via NANOG
wrote:
> Hi Allen,
>
> Ye
There is no guaranteed spectrum in CBRS without a PAL. That auction has
come and gone, but the license holders may rent out channels in time (this
is expected to happen).
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021
Wifi handoff is 802.11r.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:47 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 11/30/21 11:38 AM, Shane Ronan wrote:
>
> The spectrum is CBRS and there are MANY benefit
That's usually an OMCI control thing on the OLT (traffic shaping, qos). Do
you have a specific question in mind?
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:04 PM Dave Taht wrote:
> Does anyone have
I would have to imagine any QOS/traffic shaping is done in the OMCI and
hence would probably be in the GPON spec, g.984. I would look there.
Just guessing it would hold true with XG/s/PON, NGPON, etc.
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy
; Niagara Falls.
>
> This is not to say that rural America is a mecca of connectivity; there is
> a long way to go all the way around regardless. But it is a direct example
> as you asked for.
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 3:57 PM Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>
>> >There are plen
sac in the future. Comcast did eventually lay
>> cable. I'm sure her and her neighbors aren't the only people in America
>> to experience something similar.
>>
>> On 2/11/2022 3:14 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> >
>> > >An apartment building cou
only one or two choices of provider too.
> Of course, this is literally changing by the minute as new services are
> continually being added and upgraded.
> *Brandon Svec*
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:36 PM Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>
>> OK the one example you provided ha
Verizon Wireless does have v6. I see a 100.64/24 on my phone all the time.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:11 PM John Covici wrote:
> Verizon does not support ipv6 as far as I know, I have fios and they
> said it was not supported.
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:20:48 -0500,
> John Levine wrote:
> >
> >
IPv4 doesn't require NAT.
But to answer your question, I would say most if not all of the complaints
about NAT/double NAT are the Xbox saying strict nat instead of open. These
complaints are super rare.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:01 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 3/9/22 1:46 PM, Josh L
9, 2022 at 5:55 PM Gary E. Miller wrote:
> Yo Josh!
>
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:46:56 -0500
> Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> > Customers have 0 complaints about IPv6. 0 Complaints since 2006.
>
> Bull. I have not complained to any corporation in the last 5 years
&
ons in the last couple
> years when the small handful of customers who would complain that their
> work VPN didn't work behind the CGNAT boxes they ran turned into a heck of
> a lot MORE customers complaining.
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:48 PM Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>
>> ISP here.
rt it.
>
> Putting aside the 'zero value' idea, if you were to decide to take steps
> today , what are your blockers?
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:59 AM Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>
>> Gary,
>>
>> I'm the owner of the business. I answer a lot of tier 1 support calls.
ISP here. Deploying gigabit FTTH. No IPv6.
Customers have 0 complaints about IPv6. 0 Complaints since 2006.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM Grant Taylor via NANOG
wrote:
> On 3/9/22 1:01 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> > It's not just equipment vendors, it's ISPs.
>
> I completely agree.
>
> I get
it's still a tough slog.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG On Behalf
> Of
> Tim Howe
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 2:40 PM
> To: Josh Luthman ; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: V6 still not supported
>
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:46:56 -0500
> Josh Luthman
Start with a neighborhood. A block. something. I'm sure there's a reason
behind why something is the way it is.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2022, at 13:13, Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>
>
> I'll once again please ask for specific e
But the location has an internet service. Is it embarrassing because it
should have fiber or "better connectivity" because of its location?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:47 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 2/16/22 1:36 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> What is the embarrassment
ed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:52 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 11, 2022, at 13:14 , Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>
> Because literally every case I've seen along these lines is someone
> complaining about the coax connection is "only 100 meg when I pay for 200
> meg".
What is the embarrassment?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:28 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 2/16/22 1:13 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> I'll once again please ask for specific examples as I continue to see the
> generic "it isn't in some parts of San Jose".
>
> On the
Mine exploded since the requirement date. Some mornings I get a dozen
before lunch.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:33 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 2/17/22 11:58 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> >
> >
> https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-finds-two-providers-failed-fully-implement-stirshaken-0
> >
> >
> >
t 4:46 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>
> On 2/16/22 1:36 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> What is the embarrassment?
>
> That in the tech center of the world that we're so embarrassingly behind
> the times with broadband. I'm going to get fiber in the rural Sierra Nevada
>
ive to provide access to rural
> areas), can you explain why nearly 100% of North Dakota is serviced by FTTH
> solutions. The exceptions being the areas still run by the traditional LECs?
>
> I’m not to sure this should be an urban/rural debate.
>
> On Feb 28, 2022, at 2:53 PM,
areas we appear
> to be more interested in political wins.
>
>
> On Feb 28, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>
> According to the 477 data it's less than 50% (updated 11/1/2021 and I
> think the public 477 is 2 years? behind) What makes you believe it's
> nearly 100%?
As Google's ASN?
https://bgp.he.net/AS36492
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 11:56 AM ic wrote:
> Friends who have Starlink terminals in Europe (cz) go out through AS36492.
>
> > On 1 Mar 2022, at 05:48, Ong Beng Hui wrote:
> >
> > Curious, will that be with starlink ASN then ?
> >
> > That throw geo
I'm surprised we're having this discussion about an internet device that
the customer is using to publicize all of their information on Facebook and
Twitter. Consumers do not care enough about their privacy to the point
where they are providing the information willingly.
>Consumers should have
> CEO
> l...@6by7.net
> "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company
> in the world.”
>
> FCC License KJ6FJJ
>
> Sent from my iPhone via RFC1149.
>
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 6:26 AM, Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>
>
> I'm surpr
What if they're actively connected and you get a subpoena?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 1:30 PM TJ Trout wrote:
> ExpressVPN does NOT and WILL NEVER log:
> IP addresses (source or VPN)
>
> Browsing history
>
> Traffic destination or metadata
>
> DNS queries
>
> We have carefully engineered our apps
We've routinely seen where lines not even connected to the same circuit in
any way (ie an OTA antenna coax line and cat5 POE) cause issues with one
another. As much as we would all love to have a perfect line in the sand,
there isn't. Don't rule anything out until the issue is resolved.
As
:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 03:07:47PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
> > We've routinely seen where lines not even connected to the same circuit
> in
> > any way (ie an OTA antenna coax line and cat5 POE) cause issues with one
> > another. As much as we would all love to have a pe
>There are plenty of urban and suburban areas in America that are far worse
off from a broadband perspective than “rural America”.
Can you provide examples?
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 3:51 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG
wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 2, 2021, at 02:10 , Mark Tinka wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On
4.2.2.2 is definitely anycast, I've used that one since I think before
Google was founded...
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:01 PM Mike Lewinski via NANOG
wrote:
> > What else is like that and easy to remember and isn’t 1.1.1.1 ?
>
> 4.2.2.1, which IIRC predates both 8.8.8.8 and 1.1.1.1.
>
> Muscle
Mark,
Use the 12 foot ladder to get over the 10 foot paywall:
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.economist.com%2Fbusiness%2Fwill-the-cloud-business-eat-the-5g-telecoms-industry%2F21806999
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:12 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 1/19/22 21:52, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
Using a cheap POE switch. I'm pretty happy with it since it's cheap. It's
a bit noisy with a small load would be my only complaint - I suspect it's
the same volume at full load.
No management/layer 3 features on mine nor do I want them. I don't know if
L2 only means you want management or not.
Steve,
It looks like you're using Sonar for billing. That has the feature built
in.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 12:20 PM Steve Saner via NANOG
wrote:
> Yes, that is exactly the desire.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:03 AM J. Hellenthal
> wrote:
>
>> Im hearing something similar to "when I
3GIS here
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:33 AM Stonebraker, Jack J
wrote:
> 3GIS here. Great product.
>
> *JJ Stonebraker* | Associate Director
> The University of Texas System | Office of Telecommunication Services
> *(512) 232-0888* | j...@ots.utsystem.edu
>
>
> --
https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 4:09 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> I have a large set of residential last mile gigabit customers in the
> NYC/NJ area where the /24 sized blocks for our CPE DHCP pools has just been
> blocked by Hulu. Please contact me off
Go through this list:
https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/
The RFC only works if they're pulling your feed and they'd only know that
if you contact them in the first place.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 9:14 AM Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> Besides geofeed, there are also geoidx records in IRRs
I'd bet it's cheaper and easier to quantify new hardware than software.
Labor was super expensive and now it is ready to implode.
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 9:27 AM Dave Taht wrote:
> As I've been saying for a while, instead of buying new kit, perhaps we
> could spend some time on getting better
>Yep. No one is forcing carriers to take USF money. They can essentially
build whatever they want without USF money.
Unless of course USF funds are used to over build your already existing
network. This is exactly the situation I'm in.
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:52 PM Sean Donelan wrote:
> >
you are correct, I linked to the wrong document.
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:36 PM Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> Where does it say that it is or is not required? This is a request for
>> clarification filed by the CCA.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5,
There still is no clarification on the requirement of an official PE stamp.
My personal feeling is that if it's not decided by now, the week after
filing opens, it would be an unreasonable burden for filers. I believe
it's more "professional engineer" like a CPNI for CBRS.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022
Andrew,
Where does it say that it is or is not required? This is a request for
clarification filed by the CCA.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:59 PM Andrew Latham wrote:
> I read https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-22-543A1.pdf and a PE
> is not required.
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 9:47 AM
You have to find the local "Damage Prevention" guy. You might call the
county engineer office and see what they have for permits (for Comcast) in
the area and call that guy.
You might also find out the owner of the poles, often the power company but
maybe the phone company.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022
Look up the Broadband Data Act and the FCC BDC. This will identify what
individuals have service in ~6 months.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:41 AM Sean Donelan wrote:
> I wish (...) that public right of way agreements included a requirement
> that service providers must publish accurate service
>Well, my dsl provider has like a 25/5 50/10 so clearly everybody has the
headroom to get to 10 at least.
>I mean, most users have no clue about such things.
Lol I'm sure you're no network operator Michael. That's not accurate (well
your first statement).
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 8:29 PM Mike
I use Cogent: https://www.cogentco.com/en/looking-glass and HE which is
easier to remember: https://lg.he.net/
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 9:56 AM Glenn Kelley
wrote:
> Good Monday Morning Everyone.
>
> Quick Question:
>
> What is everyone's favorite software for running a looking glass.
>
> A
CAF nor RDOF required IPv6. BEAD doesn't say anything about IPv6. I
seriously doubt v6 gets included into the conversation because even NANOG
can't agree it is needed. The bigger concern are the people that have no
connectivity at all (no 1 mbps, no 25/3, no 100/20, no gigabit, etc).
On Tue,
Start here...
https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 3:02 PM Jason Lamb wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We are having some issues with customers logging into Hulu on some recent
> IPv4 ranges we have added to our network. I think it is likely an IPv4
> geolocation
Did you try:
Disney+: E-mail them the trouble subnet at
techops-distribut...@disneystreaming.com. Also,
techops-servi...@disneystreaming.com will probably be where that sends you.
Another possible email is disneyplusispsupp...@disneyplus.com.
https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/
29/04/2022 14:22, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> > Did you try:
> >
> > Disney+: E-mail them the trouble subnet at
> > techops-distribut...@disneystreaming.com. Also,
> > techops-servi...@disneystreaming.com will probably be where that sends
> > you. Another possible
Dish/Sling isn't on here but check this list:
https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:18 PM Nicholas Warren
wrote:
> Does anyone know how to get ahold of Sling.com or Dish to update location
> information on IPv4 addresses?
>
> I don’t know if meta
https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/juniper.net?proto=http
Just you.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 2:27 PM Jeff Shultz wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:15 AM wrote:
>
>> juniper.net down?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>> aar...@gvtc.com
>>
>>
>>
>
> Website is up from AS12044 (Oregon) at
Did you check these services?
https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 6:34 PM Christopher Munz-Michielin <
christop...@ve7alb.ca> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> For my dayjob I help run an Anycast DNS network and we've recently had
> complaints from our users in the
Does another barrier to entry make sense? This makes it even more
difficult still for new companies to start.
Do we trust the FCC to come up with an industry wide fool proof (whatever
that means) security standard? This is the same government that can't stop
fake phone calls.
On Tue, Sep 20,
ROA isn't mandatory. If it was, it would be a better comparison. Still,
showing that low adoption rate shows the industry's interest in it.
I think we all see the problem, but is there a viable solution? Is the
problem big enough to warrant the transition?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 2:29 PM
Tom Forte should still be able to help you get started (he's contracted
sales now).
thefor...@hotmail.com theforty...@gmail.com
I saw him in Vegas last week, I didn't think to get his new email address.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 2:22 PM Glenn Kelley
wrote:
> The team @ Inteserra are amazing.
>
It's very important to specify the /24 inside the /23 for example so as you
said "for all our subnets being advertised".
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 5:01 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> > Thanks everyone for your inputs. So bottomline setup RPKI and setup ROA's
> > for all our subnets being advertised.
>
>
201 - 300 of 342 matches
Mail list logo
