I have tried in the past and have never been able to get them to
work. I have seen them work at my job but the setup was complicated.
It is necessary to have necessary to have the correct hand-shake of
engine ID and engine ID count along with any keys. I would have to dig
up what we did to see abo
Net snmp documentation is pretty bad. Don't expect an answer. Better off
writing separate apps to handle the snmp work and split them up as well if you
really need multiple threads.
Sent from pPad
On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Jan Safranek wrote:
> Net-SNMP FAQ says that "... SNMPv3 support w
I second this request. I am trying to configure V3 users and its a
real pain. Perhaps this type of function would be nice.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:32 AM, sarath azad wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you please tell, in a program, what is the best method to show all the
> SNMPv3 users configured?
>
> I
There seems to be a problem with mib2c.check_values_local.conf in that it
generates a file with a double include symbol of XXX_CHECKFNS_H.
As this is the same symbol as is used in xxx_checkfns.h, xxx_checkfns_local.h
never gets included at all.
Very simple patch below...
diff -Naur -x '.*.swp'
If you display an object which has a negative small value, and a DISPLAY-HINT
of something like d-3, then you can get results like:
.0-7
The following patch fixes it, but I think it makes the function a bit of a
mess:
diff -Naur net-snmp-5.7.2-unpatched/snmplib/mib.c net-snmp-5.7.2/snmplib/mi
Very nice! Thanks!
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:39:20 +0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: DISPLAY-HINT "b"
>
> Den 24-09-2013 08:00, Niels Baggesen skrev:
> > On Mon, S
I thought this was meant to be the way of specifying a bit mask, but it just
comes out as "%b", which isn't a lot of use!
Am I doing something wrong?
--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Y
any systemBootTime
> that tells, as a DateAndTime string, when the system was last booted.
Personally I'd also like a numeric value (with longer wrap period) as it makes
the calculations easier!
Mike.
> Subject: Re: sysUpTime discrepancy
> From: [email protected]
> To: mjvm...
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 20:46 +, Andy Cress wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Currently net-snmp measures sysUpTime relative to when the snmpd
> starts, and perhaps that is often the same as the overall system
> uptime, but in some systems, the services could be restarted without
> rebooting, so I am proposin
Here are a couple of useful links related to this. I think the issue lies
in the OID, regardless of Net-SNMP version.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/573246
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2007-November/045553.html
--
A nice detailed leak report. Coders, can you please investigate?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mark Brooks [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:33 AM
To: Mike Ayers
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Memory Leaking
I call the API
function read_objid(). read_objid() returns zero (success) on the Windows
test program but non-zero (failure) on the Solaris 10 equivelant.
Any suggestions for debugging this issue?
Thanks
-Mike
--
Download
adding "--disable-embedded-perl --without-perl-modules" to the ./configure
command options seems to have done it. Make now runs all the way through.
Thank you very much
-Mike
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Anders
wrote:
> Mike Walker wrote:
> > This definitely h
Wireshark) on my 64bit Solaris build. This same issue
does *not* exist on my 64bit Windows build.
Thanks again, and any further suggestions are welcome. As well, I'll report
any progress I make...
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Anders
wrote:
> Mike Walker wrote:
> > My pro
provide for setting the CFLAGS , or adding to the
existing CFLAGS variable for net-snmp builds will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 13:25 -0500, Mike Walker wrote:
> > Has anyone successfully built net-snmp
Ok, I'll try it and report back.
Thank you.
On Feb 28, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Mike Walker wrote:
>> Has anyone successfully built net-snmp 5.5 for Solaris 10 in 64bit
>> mode?
>
> I've built earlier SVN versions this way without any problems o
Has anyone successfully built net-snmp 5.5 for Solaris 10 in 64bit mode?
Following the guidelines in
http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/docs/README.solaris.html builds Solaris 10
libraries in 32bit mode only; subsequently linking my 64bit app generates a
"wrong ELF class" linkage error...
Thanks for
on an
interval.
I understand that several OIDs can be packed into the PDU that is sent, but
I am not exactly sure how to send the request on an interval.
Any help is much appriciated.
Thanks,
Mike Gibson
--
This SF.Net ema
t a miss. ;-)
Best luck... please let us know any successes you may have!
Cheers,
Mike.
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development su
On 11/13/09 2:22 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> 2009/11/13 Mike Bowie:
>
>> Looking at agent/mibgroup/mibII/ip.c @ 850 onwards, the "Loaded IP Group
>> (sysctl)" message is only called if IPFORWARDING and IPDEFAULTTTL are
>> missed and ret_value is greater
dpstat nor _udpstat found.
NET-SNMP version 5.4.2.1
Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:65439->[0.0.0.0]
mibII/ip: Loaded IP Group (sysctl)
mibII/ip: Handler - mode GET
mibII/ip: oid: IP-MIB::ipForwarding.0
truncating integer value > 32 bits
Mike.
--
IPS_NOROUTE */
/* #undef STRUCT_IPSTAT_HAS_IPS_ODROPPED */
/* #undef STRUCT_IPSTAT_HAS_IPS_OFRAGMENTS */
/* #undef STRUCT_IPSTAT_HAS_IPS_REASSEMBLED */
/* #undef HAVE_SYS_TCPIPSTATS_H */
Thanks!
Mike.
--
Let Crystal Reports handle
On 11/12/09 12:39 AM, Dave Shield wrote:
> 2009/11/11 Mike Bowie :
>> pkgsrc is currently building 5.4.2.1.
>
> OK - so it's a recent release.
>
>> $ snmpwalk -v1 -c public 127.0.0.1 | grep "should be"
>> IP-MIB::ipForwarding.0 = Wrong Type (shou
On 11/11/09 2:53 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> 2009/11/11 Mike Bowie :
>> Just a quick inquiry to see if anyone in the net-snmp team is looking at
>> (or perhaps leaning towards) NetBSD as a target. I've been asking
>> around in the NetBSD and pkgsrc communities for quite s
).[1]
Any insight or suggestions would be most welcome... hosts sans snmpd
make for rather hit and miss monitoring / management. (Mostly miss.)
Sincerest thanks,
Mike.
Refs:
[1] http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2009/05/04/msg0
ecure
> 3.very-secure (i.e., no-initial-configuration)
>
>
> May i know the security posture in net-snmp ?
Security posture is a deplyment issue, not an implementation issue. It
is your ch
> From: Fulko Hew [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:23 AM
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Mike Ayers
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > From: Fulko Hew [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > Sent: Saturday, March 21,
les in many locations as told in FAQ.
> Sometimes these files are overwritten by daemon/agent (I
> really dont know) and the files become "socket files" with
> the following content
> There is no such file or device.
Sounds like misconfiguration or bad linkage.
le.1.2.(first index). If you get next on ifIndex.1,
or ifTable.1.1, the correct response is ifTable.1.2.(first index).
Note that ifIndex is not guarant3eed to start at 1, nor are values
guaranteed to be contiguous.
You may be
If you do get an answer to this, please do tell - I want to run
net-snmp on my Dreamcast!
From what I do know of WinCE, you should be able to load the .dsp file
into a WinCE capable Visual Studio, but changes ma
ion failure like I expect.
Could someone try this and see if they get the same behavior? I'm seeing
this with both MD5/DES and SHA/AES snmpv3 users.
Thanks.
--Mike
"Mike Harless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> See http":[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> &g
Dave,
> Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 03/04/2008, Mike Harless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've got a question on how failures are supposed to work with snmpv3
> > > when I'm using authPriv and I supply a bad privPassw
Dave,
Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03/04/2008, Mike Harless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've got a question on how failures are supposed to work with snmpv3
> > when I'm using authPriv and I supply a bad privPassword. Is the request
&g
I've got a question on how failures are supposed to work with snmpv3
when I'm using authPriv and I supply a bad privPassword. Is the request
just supposed to timeout (like I'm seeing), or should I get some type
of error back (like I do with a bad authPassword)?
is 161 ? how can I run it
> as a user which is not a superuser?
Unixen will not permit a port <4096 to be opened by a uid other than 0.
If you are on a unix family host, then you may run snmpd as non-root, but
*must* use a port number >=4096. I typically use port
Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On tis, 2008-03-04 at 11:01 -0800, Mike Harless wrote:
> > I've got a device with 2 physical network interfaces, and I'd like
> > to implement an oid that should have a different value based upon
> >
from in my subagent's oid handler? Thanks.
--Mike
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120
oblem. I don't know if
there are helpers for this. I would recommend using very large numbers for
your ifIndex to keep clear of those generated by the MIB module.
Hopefully, the ifTable implementation has a way to cooperatively add
your own
the samples :)
The current hypothesis is we have a buffer overrun, and its messing with
the secondary index.
MV
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 31/08/06, Mike Varley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Don't you hate it when people withhold information? :)
>
>
> a) You might
Thanks Dave, here is some more information on our bug.
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 31/08/06, Mike Varley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> we are seeing an snmptable command respond with question
>> marks ('?') as the result for some of the column entries; and I
retreiving the same index over and over again.
Has anyone seen behaviour like this before?
Is this expected if the MIB-code is returning erroneous data?
Thanks for any input you can provide.
MV
--
~~~~~
Mike Varley -= SOMA Networks =-
aven't
tested it further than that.
Mike
--- agent/mibgroup/ucd-snmp/lmSensors.c.orig 2004-10-15 23:04:29.0 -0400
+++ agent/mibgroup/ucd-snmp/lmSensors.c 2005-06-10 15:12:43.578282000 -0400
@@ -344,284 +344,236 @@
/* *** picld sensor procedures * */
#ifdef HAVE_PICL_H
+/*
Mike Fisher wrote:
Bruce Shaw wrote:
Could you post it as a patch? I'd like to have a look at it. My code
works on my E450's, V880's and 280r's.
Minor clarification: I have code, but it's not been integrated back into
the agent yet. (hence my original query) It&#
hat seems to work on
MF>the 240R, V880, E450, V210, V440, and V1280, and I have several other
MF>platforms yet to test.
Something else I noticed while looking over the lmSensor MIB today: The
MIB indicated that temperature values should be in mC, but th
ement of sensor nodes therein. I've got code that seems to work on
the 240R, V880, E450, V210, V440, and V1280, and I have several other
platforms yet to test.
Mike
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you
not duplicate effort if it's already being done.
Mike
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput
a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to sco
not duplicate effort if it's already being done.
Mike
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput
a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to sco
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:26:44 -0500, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:18:03 -0600 Mike wrote:
> MK> I'm using version 5.2.1 (the latest release AFAIK). There are two
> MK> handlers involved in my subagent: the stock integer handler (i.e.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:02:17 -0500, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What release are you using? What type of handler are you using? Did you use
> mib2c to generate the code?
I'm using version 5.2.1 (the latest release AFAIK). There are two
handlers involved in my subagent: the stock in
Hi,
I've run across a problem that was discussed on this list about 3
months ago. From the archives, it doesn't look like it was resolved.
Here's the situation. I have a subagent running to handle a private
MIB that I wrote. If I try to run snmpset on more than one variable
at once, the agent
Hello all;
I am in the process of completing an extension to snmptranslate that will
allow it to dump reports in mib2schema format. For those of you unfamiliar
with this format it is used by some SNMP programs as a sort of compiled
version of MIBS. The input would be a collection of MIB files and
data_point) (&callback_loop_context,
&callback_data_context,
index_search, iinfo);
Comments?
Mike Thatcher
talk to the server. In thinking about this,
doesn't it make sense for NetSNMP to calculate engine time from the
CLOCK_MONOTONIC clock (if available)? That clock completely isolates
one from a user's capricious clock change. Just a thought ...
-Mike Ferrara
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS
O support the version you use, would you look at snmplib/scapi.c ?
> Look at how OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER is used, and please provide a patch
> that works for you.
>
> Thank you,
> -Mike Slifcak
>
>
> >
> > From: "Willem Jan Withagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bruce Shaw wrote:
I believe Wes made a change to configure.in to take into account operating
systems (like linux) that have f_frsize but don't at statvfs (if I
understand correctly). We may have fixed the problem twice.
Not that I mind belt-and-suspenders solution, I'm just wondering what other
OS
Robert Story (Coders) wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:39:13 -0400 Mike wrote:
MS> > 1.[ 956272 ] Solaris hostres hrPartitionSize values 8 times too big
MS> >
MS> >>This is the biggie. It's reporting incorrect values and the fix is
MS> >>relatively simple.
MS&g
wondering if I should be using #if instead of #ifdef.
19-Jun-2004 Mike Slifcak
Modified from original patch "hr_filesys.FRSIZE.diff"
to be Solaris2 specific.
since Linux compiles failed
There may be other combinations that are more universal,
and those are left for another time.
Robert Story (Coders) wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:21:40 -0400 Mike wrote:
MS> Mike Slifcak wrote:
MS> > William A.Carrel wrote:
MS> >
MS> >> In agent/mibgroup/util_funcs.c:~228, cachebytes needs to be ssize_t.
MS> >> Left as size_t breaks the if(cachebytes &
this is a complete rewrite
(which I don't have time for - I've got a sick server) best left for 5.2.
4.
First CPU test is wrong. I don't know what I was thinking of.
It should be CHECKORDIE "^.1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.2.1.3.768 = STRING: CPU"
That change was made to both V5-1-
Mike Slifcak wrote:
William A.Carrel wrote:
As I just added to a bug on Sourceforge, a change made in the not too
distant past broke pass, exec and possibly other things.
In agent/mibgroup/util_funcs.c:~228, cachebytes needs to be ssize_t.
Left as size_t breaks the if(cachebytes < 0) when
Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:23:23 -0700, "Thanh Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Thanh> Does anyone know if net-snmp 5.1.x (or any net-snmp release) work on
Thanh> FreeBSD 5.2x OS ?
Probably?
the latest net-snmp.5.1.2.pre2 does work,
for some definition of "work" %-)
-
hem to you.
Regards,
Bosko Milekic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike Slifcak wrote:
Your description and accompanying patch were added to bug repository.
Reference bug # [ 975063 ] snmp_sess_close NULL deref
The patch was applicable to all 5.x branches and will appear
in t
Bruce Shaw wrote:
BS> There's a couple of Solaris bugs I'd like rectified for 5.1.2. I've
already
BS> posted patches.
1.[ 956272 ] Solaris hostres hrPartitionSize values 8 times too big
This is the biggie. It's reporting incorrect values and the fix is
relatively simple
Hello. My apologies to Niels if he has already replied to this thread.
The NULL-pointer dereferencing patch was applied today to
5.0 patches, 5.1. patches, and current branches.
The snmptrapd memory leaks that you provided fixes for was managed with different
patches,
[Thanks to Niels!!],
but no
Your description and accompanying patch were added to bug repository.
Reference bug # [ 975063 ] snmp_sess_close NULL deref
The patch was applicable to all 5.x branches and will appear
in the next release.
-Mike Slifcak
Bosko Milekic wrote:
Hi,
My snmptrapd setup has a trap default forward entry
Bruce, The URLs were line-wrapped making them less useful.
I've replaced them with the patch number and description
immediately following the number of the item.
Bruce Shaw wrote:
There's a couple of Solaris bugs I'd like rectified for 5.1.2. I've already
posted patches.
1.[ 956272 ] Solaris hostr
mbers from "configure" would help
keep the intent clear-er, the code clean-er, and maybe even easier
to read and understand!
Mike Slifcak wrote:
Dave Shield wrote:
This patch eliminates an incorrect logic test in ucd-snmp/disk.c
H
Sorry Mike, but I'm not convinced.
Just looki
Dave Shield wrote:
This patch eliminates an incorrect logic test in ucd-snmp/disk.c
H
Sorry Mike, but I'm not convinced.
Just looking at the code, the check now seems to bear absolutely
no relation to the code it is allegedly protecting.
Can you remind me what the compile erro
roblem description
indicates the error occurs under certain conditions.
The one line change was committed to V5-1-patches and main CVS branches,
and will be available in the next release.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you for the increased understanding.
Sincerely,
-Mike Slifcak
---
platforms
are not negatively impacted by those patches.
Thanks!
-Mike Slifcak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't really want to muck further with which data structure has
> what member. On FreeBSD 5.x, both "struct statfs" and "struct statvfs"
> have member &quo
Andy Smith responds:
--- Begin Message ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Alex Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2004/06/08 Tue AM 08:40:49 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: small adjustment to install scripting is (i think) warranted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mik
7-Jun-2004 Mike Slifcak
This patch fixes a problem with a non-existent structure member
seen during a build on FreeBSD 5.x platform.
Builds on FreeBSD 4.x and FreeBSD 5.x are affected.
Note the memcpy near line 612. The intent is to address one element
in a large array for the purpose of
72 matches
Mail list logo
