easy to get.)
BTW what is the downside of having IPV6 only? Isn't it the future anyway?
Mayuresh
ns. [Contrary to newbies opting for Linux because it's more widely
used.]
Mayuresh
UR per month and no setup fees, which sounds rather cheap.
I was thinking Vultr to be the cheapest in the low end space. Vultr low
end plan is 1core/512MB/10GB/500GB/no IPV4/1xIPV6/no backup for $2.5. So
above is lot better.
But on the link given I didn't notice custom ISO. Do they support?
Mayuresh
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 09:20:57PM +, Christopher Pinon wrote:
> but naturally the downside is that the provider won't be able to help
> with NetBSD-specific issues.
What could be NetBSD-specific issues that would require provider's help? I
have faced none till now. Just curious.
Mayuresh
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 01:47:10PM +0100, Andrew Luke Nesbit wrote:
> Also, don't forget SDF. They offer NetBSD VPS's.
Slightly OT:
There is a poll going on, on sdf to choose between Debian and NetBSD for
MetaArray IV.
sdfers on the list may please vote with their choice!
Mayuresh
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 01:37:51PM +0100, Sad Clouds wrote:
> Hello, do you know what hypervisor they use for your NetBSD VPS?
Sorry, no idea.
Mayuresh
ing NetBSD with a (small) website and email for a few users.
Mayuresh
if i wish to write code at the kernel level, but above the 'hal'
would it be necessary for me to have a good command over low
level assembler? or just a superficial introduction to assembler
be good enough?
thanks.
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 10:32:42AM +0200, ignat...@cs.uni-bonn.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 08:37:28PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
>
> > I like the simpicity of htpasswd method. But not being able to logout is
> > a little undesirable.
>
> This is n
ctionality
easily and zeroed on python-flask. Yet to explore in detail, but that's
not still looking as light as I'd have imagined.
Would be interesting to know simple authentication solutions used in
NetBSD community for above scenario.
Mayuresh
not find A. international
availability / shipping B. Whether NetBSD would run on it.
Surprisingly amd64 SBCs are so rare to find, and further one has to find
one with NetBSD compatibility.
Mayuresh
ng
worked with NetBSD?
Mayuresh
support it.
Please do share recommendations / experiences.
Mayuresh
the "BFD:" errors on various libraries, only 2-3
samples of that are attached above.
I think during build of the packages I had seen those errors as well, but
not sure.
Please advise.
Mayuresh
works fine as urndis0 on NetBSD 8.0 amd64.
I do not know whether this is a problem with -current or with evbarm. (I
do not have amd64 -current or evbarm 8.0, unfortunately.)
What more can I try out?
Mayuresh
But when I want to use ~user/cgi-bin URL, what should be the argument to
"-c" above? (It is clear that -u and -E should be specified, I have those
in my httpd_flags.)
Can someone share example of command line options to enable ~user/cgi-bin?
Mayuresh
seems in its very early stages still 0.10.1 though it
appears to be an active project.
[1]
https://www.netbsd.org/docs/guide/en/chap-cgd.html#chap-cgd-suggestions-warnings
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EncFS#EncFS_1.8_security_concerns
[3] https://www.cryfs.org/
Mayuresh
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:00:16PM +0200, Michael van Elst wrote:
> You can find most details about config.txt documented here:
>
> https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/configuration/config-txt/
Thanks. Disabling overscan solved it.
Mayuresh
whether / how well it works and
any specific version etc.
Mayuresh
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:54:00AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> Basically the thread has moved on to recognize 1. ssl version upgrade in
> current 2. squid3 being "old" and "not recommended" by upstream and 3.
> wip/squid4 being created and compiling fine with either versi
rent 2. squid3 being "old" and "not recommended" by upstream and 3.
wip/squid4 being created and compiling fine with either version of ssl.
Mayuresh
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 07:53:56AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> [Will have to sort out why my ssh keys aren't working. Wonder whether
> those would be deleted if not used for long!]
Everything ok. My keys of 2015 still work!
I have just initialized wip/squid4 and checked compilability on
e build
> directory to see the real error message(s) from the configure test.
Yes, that was the first thing I did.
Mayuresh
eated wip/squid4 (yet to push) and it seems to be
building fine on 8.0 amd64. Yet to try on current.
[Will have to sort out why my ssh keys aren't working. Wonder whether
those would be deleted if not used for long!]
Mayuresh
urrent and 8.0
amd64.
Mayuresh
new installations."
Time to create squid4?
Mayuresh
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 09:39:57AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 01:06:08PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> > configure scripts (squid3 for one, but may be there are others) look for
> > SSL_library_init. How to deal with that?
>
> They need to be adjus
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 09:28:38AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:54:46PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:50:45PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> > > # uname -m && nm /usr/lib/libssl.so | grep SSL_library_init
> >
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:50:45PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> # uname -m && nm /usr/lib/libssl.so | grep SSL_library_init
> amd64
> 00022411 T SSL_library_init
> #
>
>
> # uname -m && nm /usr/lib/libssl.so | grep SSL_library_init
> evbarm
> #
>
> Why this difference?
+port-arm
Basically:
# uname -m && nm /usr/lib/libssl.so | grep SSL_library_init
amd64
00022411 T SSL_library_init
#
# uname -m && nm /usr/lib/libssl.so | grep SSL_library_init
evbarm
#
Why this difference?
Mayuresh
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:47:15AM +, JP wrote:
> SSL_library_init is in there on current amd64.
>
> "library 'ssl' is required" -- is libssl on there at all?
configure errors can be misleading. The library is there but nm does not
show the specific symbol in it.
Mayuresh
...@mkrepro.netbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/evbarm/compile/RPI2 evbarm
The symbol is present in base libssl on amd64 8.0. Wonder whether this is
specific to RPI2 or specific to current.
Should pkg openssl be used in such case?
Mayuresh
f them is there a documentation available?
Mayuresh
of these, if there any configuration things that I need to try
please let me know. If more details are needed for investigation will be
happy to share as well.
Mayuresh
?
Mayuresh
why do i get 2 emails every time there's a reply to any email by me or
to me? earlier i thought it was my mail client (mailx) which was doing
something crazy, but it isn't so, a simply reply to netbsd-users goes
out and sends me 2 copies of that same mail. like clock-work.
> From bounces-netbsd-users-owner-mayuresh=sdf@netbsd.org Mon Apr 22
> 04:55:39 2019
> From: Robert Elz
> To: Mayuresh Kathe
> cc: netbsd-users@netbsd.org
> Subject: Re: netbsd : internals : bach book : good to start-off?
>
> Date:Mon, 22 Apr 2019
> From bounces-netbsd-users-owner-mayuresh=sdf@netbsd.org Mon Apr 22
> 04:31:24 2019
> From: Robert Elz
> To: Mayuresh Kathe
> cc: netbsd-users@netbsd.org
> Subject: Re: netbsd : internals : bach book : good to start-off?
>
> Date:Mon, 22 Apr 2019
thanks for that jay, looking at the netbsd using lynx prevents one from
going to a lot of places on the website.
> From jaypatel@gmail.com Mon Apr 22 04:19:08 2019
> From: Jay Patel
> Subject: Re: is netbsd actually a toolkit?
> To: Mayuresh Kathe
> Cc: "netbsd
freebsd has an internal focus to become a good server operating system.
openbsd has an internal focus to become a highly secure operating system.
what is netbsd's internal focus? can't be just a highly portable operating
system! is it more to be a really good toolkit for people to build their
own
would "the design of the unix operating system" by maurice bach
be good as a starting off point to understand netbsd internals?
of-course, there's no substitute to reading and re-reading the
source, but just something to act as a spring-board!
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 09:57:02PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:12:10AM -0500, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
> > > I am just intrigued by it being written in python (except may be for the
> > > merge algorithm which is in C). Wouldn't most engineers prefer C/C++
lt.
I think these are relatively early days for rust and even llvm (in terms
of optimizations etc). Both look promising and more applications adopting
them would make them only better over time.
Mayuresh
language, or it might be done by writing
> parts of the application in C.
Came across this: plan to use rust for hg:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/OxidationPlan
Quite interesting. Would be good to see A. hg using a compiled language B.
rust getting another big user.
Mayuresh
ey component?
Regarding NetBSD, pkgsrc-wip was moved to git and pkgsrc has a git view of
its CVS repo. So I thought git was more likely candidate in NetBSD.
It will help if list members with experience of both git and hg could
share some pros and cons of both. (No flame war meant!)
Mayuresh
any problems on an encfs mount.
But I have used hg very little. Is that a good alternative to git or are
there better options?
Mayuresh
>8.0 base libperfuse should be usable.
Please let me know if above analysis is correct.
Mayuresh
same state...
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-users/2010/02/06/msg011657.html
Mayuresh
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 12:49:25PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
>
Just in case it matters: It was NetBSD 8.0_RC1 amd64 on the HDD while it
was NetBSD 8.0 amd64 on the flash drive mentioned in my last post.
Mayuresh
or was a false alarm and I can continue to
use this drive for some time now?
Mayuresh
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:48:51AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> 3. We might as well take this opportunity to encfs-1.9.5. I have already
> confirmed the results on the list.
Missing words: upgrade to.
Mayuresh
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 12:31:26AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> Is it possible that the issue / limitation is with librefuse? (And in that
> case shall we be trying using filesystems/fuse?
I pursued above point further. I took offline help from Emmanuel Dreyfus.
Thanks Emmanuel for your
ges shows following kinds of errors repeatedly when io error
mentioned above occurs:
encfs[1434]: ERROR withFileNode: error caught in fgetattr:
fh=139135124959488 not found in fuseFhMap
Mayuresh
ollect it was working on NetBSD as ugen0 itself.
So I think you might not require reconfiguring kernel since yours is shown
as ugen0. You might just have to tinker with the device option (-d) of
scanimage.
[I do not have that setup now, otherwise I'd have shared my exact device
string.]
Mayuresh
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 09:24:17AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> encfs: perfuse_open: setsockopt SO_SNDBUF to 2162688 failed: No buffer space
> available
Env var, something like, PERFUSE_BUFSIZE=131072 solves above error.
(Larger than that doesn't work. May be some sysctl setting would make i
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 12:31:26AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> Is it possible that the issue / limitation is with librefuse? (And in that
> case shall we be trying using filesystems/fuse?
Just giving it a try. Was able to build filesystems/fuse-encfs against
filesystems/fuse.
# ldd /usr/p
fs for me, as the issue is not just git. I was
planning to use encfs for various kinds of files, applications of some of
which might run into mmap issue.
Mayuresh
'
This problem occurs with encfs mounted directory only. From the error
message it does not look like a git problem, rather some interaction
between mmap and encfs.
Would be interesting to know what's happening and is it possible to deal
with this error.
Mayuresh
heard about freebsd guys using the concurrency kit (concurrencykit.org)
in their kernel. anyone has any idea about how it could be useful from
a netbsd perspective too? i was under the impression that the kit would
be useful only for userland projects, wonder what role it would play at
the kernel
running a netbsd vm on a google compute engine is a nice idea, but
that makes me dependent on the network, something which cannot be
trusted to not fail.
> From bsieg...@gmail.com Fri Apr 12 09:05:51 2019
> From: Benny Siegert
> Subject: Re: how to use netbsd with ubuntu?
> To: Ma
> From er.abhinav.upadh...@gmail.com Fri Apr 12 07:45:24 2019
> From: Abhinav Upadhyay
> Subject: Re: how to use netbsd with ubuntu?
> To: Mayuresh Kathe
> Cc: NetBSD Users Mailing List
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:03 PM Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> >
> > as i
as in a previous email, i need to use ubuntu as my primary desktop.
i researched various options via googling around as well as asking
this mailing list and it looks like the best thing would be to run
netbsd in a virtual environment. for the same, would "qemu" be
considered good enough? if it is,
The man page of bozohttpd in the base (NetBSD 8.0) says TLS 1.1 and 1.2 is
supported.
But I couldn't find much documentation about how to enable it.
Are there any tutorials on how to use TLS with bozohttpd?
Mayuresh
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 09:46:31PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> BTW I notice that pkgsrc's filesystems/fuse is version 2.9. Thus it may
> not require compat22 patch.
>
> But I am not sure how to make fuse-encfs pick pkgsrc's fuse rather than
> from base. I installed filesystems/fuse
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 08:58:16PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> +#ifdef __NetBSD__
> + fuse_unmount_compat22(mountPoint);
> +#else
>fuse_unmount(mountPoint, nullptr);
> +#endif
BTW I notice that pkgsrc's filesystems/fuse is version 2.9. Thus it may
not require compat22 patch.
Bu
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 08:58:16PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> It builds fine but I am yet to test it.
This is to confirm that in quick tests this is working fine for me.
Knowing the stability would take some usage over time.
I'd feel hugely relieved if it works stably on NetBSD. It would so
e.h but I do not know whether it can be used in place of fuse_unmount.
Would appreciate if someone could comment on this.
ccing netbsd-users also.
Mayuresh
pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-8.0/images/NetBSD-8.0-amd64-install.img.gz
?() at 0
usb_transfer_complete() at netbsd:usb_transfer_complete+0x148
xhci_softintr() ...+0x1df
usb_soft_intr() ...+0x38
softint_dispatch() ...+0x91
Mayuresh
_transfer_complete+0x...
xhci_softintr() ...
usb_soft_intr() ...
softint_dispatch() ...
DDB lost frame for netbsd:Xsoftintr+0x4f, trying 0x
--- interrupt ---
bb6
Mayuresh
0# (Cyl. 0 - 122197*)
Mayuresh
tick based installation.
The drive is barely 3 years old and also hosts Linux which has not shown
any warnings. Am I right in interpretation of above error or is there
something I can try with the hard drive to extend its useful life?
Mayuresh
> From bsieg...@gmail.com Tue Apr 2 09:30:51 2019
> From: Benny Siegert
> Subject: Re: netbsd development on a raspberry pi
> To: Mayuresh Kathe
> Cc: NetBSD Users
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:55 AM Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> > the question that i don't h
hello, returning to netbsd after a long time, feels good to be back.
i am in a peculiar situation for which i can't figure out a solution.
i have my primary desktop, an 'hp-aio' based on a dual-core celeron.
i have to run ubuntu on it since i need to run "google chrome".
i tried "chromium" but
rpose. You'd rather want
a Linux DomU to use 1 cpu and let NetBSD Dom0 use the rest.
Looking forward to a wider discussion on this.
Mayuresh
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 07:58:46AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > > This is on 8.0_RC1 amd64.
>
> Have you considered updating? There are 3854 lines in doc/CHANGES*
> since that version.
It is on my TODO list, though there is some inertia. Will try to do it
soon.
Mayuresh.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:08:42AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> This is on 8.0_RC1 amd64.
>
> newsyslog: /var/run/syslogd.pid: No such file or directory
>
syslogd is sometimes exiting, not sure why, there is no disk space issue,
nothing with heavy use of memory/swap is running.
L
This is on 8.0_RC1 amd64.
Occasionally (not regularly) I get the following email alert:
newsyslog: /var/run/syslogd.pid: No such file or directory
What does this indicate and what can I check in this regard.
Mayuresh
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 05:56:31PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> In rejectall
> /./ REJECT 550 5.1.1
>
> Now gmail does not complain. However I still don't know why it still shows
> 554 5.7.1 first and then 550 5.1.1
Dropped the word REJECT and now it works fine.
Mayuresh
Sender address rejected: 550 5.1.1
Mayuresh
t id).
But struggling to find out an example of how to do it - how do I relate my
reject point with a certain reject code?
Mayuresh
d-19563/Exim-Exim.html
I am not an expert in comparing these and I am not taking any side. But
let's put both on the table to make a fair comparison:
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-8450/product_id-14794/Postfix-Postfix.html
Mayuresh
ted my postfix conf in previous mail.
Mayuresh
s not really sound
intuitive, particularly when the problem domain does not require it to be
that complex. I'll definitely give exim a try on this aspect.
Mayuresh
of such bounce.
So thought of giving an alternative server a try to see if for a similar
situation sending servers complain or not.
Mayuresh
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:50:44AM -0200, Silas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:09:56AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> > Since your friend runs multiple lists, may be he has been able to put such
> > restriction. Please do share if you can.
>
> I talked to him
strict sending mails to a list to
the members of the list only. postfix documentation [1] does give this
scenario, but I find the documentation to be cryptic and things aren't yet
working.
Since your friend runs multiple lists, may be he has been able to put such
restriction. Please do share if you c
estions on postfix-blists combination
for my requirements (i.e. mailing list with archives for a closed group of
around 300, with web browsable archives and small resource footprint).
I am considering adding blists it to pkgsrc-wip, after knowing the
comments from the list.
Mayuresh
[1] https
chiver (not sure which, HyperKitty to name one
that mailman 3 uses)
While #3 does not matter much to me (will maintain list manually for a
more or less static group)
Then:
Am I missing any MIME related issues?
Mayuresh
Thanks. It seems more economical to do it postfix level. Just that
procmail spec can be written without postfix/root privileges giving some
comfort on that aspect.
Would there be some downsides of doing it with procmail - besides cpu
cycles?
Mayuresh
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 09:45:16PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> I am looking to set up a mailing list manager on a NetBSD server.
>
> The member count is more or less fixed between 300 to 350 and isn't going
> to grow beyond.
>
> The email archive should be browsable and search
list and hardly drew any response - except
from 1 user who echoed similar concern. I have to assume their ML to be
deeply dormant if not dead.
Mayuresh
[1] http://mlmmj.org/archive/mlmmj/
the list or file a PR.
Mayuresh
y. I am currently tending towards mlmmj due
to the claims of smaller footprint as I'll be using a VPS to host this.
Above para in your reply is something that really forewarns me about what
I might almost certainly run into in a year or two ... I'd probably stick
to a techy list for now and leave the rest to the future.
Mayuresh
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 07:19:41AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> > I'm not sure if it is in pkgsrc but mlmmj is nice.
>
> Thanks. Seems to be a successor of ezmlm. But looks like it is not
> constrained to work with qmail like ezmlm.
>
> Seems to be in pkgsrc-wip. For a pr
like ezmlm.
Seems to be in pkgsrc-wip. For a production use I'd tend to have a little
bias towards pkgsrc.
Still, are there things with mlmmj that you can mention as specific likes?
I'd even look at slimness and compact resource footprint as pluses.
Mayuresh
traint.
1997 looks scary as well - I know that's not a particularly objective
remark, may be just psychological. For same reason I am not considering
majordomo, though as a user of several majordomo lists I never faced any
problem.
Mayuresh
ist prefer majordomo or it's a legacy
with no specific reason to change (or are there thoughts about changing
it?)
Mayuresh
[1] https://www.sympa.org/documentation/mailmanvssympa.html
rior discussion on this. If a PR helps take a step
towards logical conclusion (either way), I have filed one (yet to receive
a number).
Mayuresh
about "that's how it has always been". But
may not be a bad idea to discuss anyway.
Mayuresh
deline is to explicitly enable things. Hence
the question, whether it is felt to be critical.
Mayuresh
401 - 500 of 847 matches
Mail list logo
