[netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

[netmod] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

OK. I think it would be helpful to the reader to say that explicitly. -ekr On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> Hi Andy, >> >> I don't want to overrotate on period, as I was just using it as an >> example. >> >> As

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Hi Andy, > > I don't want to overrotate on period, as I was just using it as an example. > > As I said, there are a pile of other characters that are not in either > set. Are > they allowed or not? > > That is the only other character allowed

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Hi Andy, I don't want to overrotate on period, as I was just using it as an example. As I said, there are a pile of other characters that are not in either set. Are they allowed or not? -Ekr On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Eric Rescor

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> >>> Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for >>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: No Objection >>

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply t

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

[To all those that said this draft was ready, really?] Hi Mahesh, Thanks for the update. I found some more issues. Some must be fixed, others are nits, and might be caught by the RFC Editor. But I think that it's embarrassing to receive comments for such things from the IESG, as is recently

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel fr

[netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer t

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Benoit Claise wrote: > Hi Alexey, Warren, >> >> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included i

Re: [netmod] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alvaro, Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) P

Re: [netmod] Notifications with state data reference

Dear Michal, I think the short answer is that the server replays notifications as they were was recorded. Operational state is about "in use" values and on many systems it is impossible to take a consistent snapshot of operational state and hence clients will have little chances to obtain consist

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alexey, Warren, Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, h

Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Andy/Benoit, Your suggested changes look good to me. I will clear as soon as the new version hits. Regards Suresh On Mar 7, 2018, at 5:24 AM, Benoit Claise mailto:bcla...@cisco.com>> wrote: Suresh, On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Suresh Krishnan mailto:sur...@kaloom.com>> wrote: Suresh

[netmod] Notifications with state data reference

Hi, in ietf-hardware [1] there are notifications defined that include leafrefs pointing to state data leaves. When the notification is generated, it is validated with regard to the current state data and if successful, the notification is then stored for possible future replay. Now, what happens

Re: [netmod] default namespace in XPath

On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:06 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > sec. 6.4.1 in RFC 7950 says in the second bullet item: > > > > Names without a namespace prefix belong to the same namespace as > > the identifier of the current node. > > > > It is uncle

Re: [netmod] default namespace in XPath

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > sec. 6.4.1 in RFC 7950 says in the second bullet item: > > Names without a namespace prefix belong to the same namespace as > the identifier of the current node. > > It is unclear what "current node" means: > > 1. Is it the context node of the XPath exp

[netmod] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer t

Re: [netmod] Proposal for minimalist full NMDA support in schema mount

Robert Varga writes: > On 27/02/18 08:02, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> The initial virtual interim decided to use Martin's combined proposal >> and most of my subsequent objections were rejected on the basis of that >> decision. That's why I hate discussing complicated things in virtual >> interims

Re: [netmod] default namespace in XPath

Hi Michal, On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 10:18 +0100, Michal Vaško wrote: > Hello, > we have implemented it as option 1 based on the "current()" function Right, I have the same in my implementation. It is however counter-intuitive in cases like my example because unprefixed names normally receive the na

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Yes on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Alexey, Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refe

Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Suresh, On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Suresh Krishnan > wrote: Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addres

Re: [netmod] ?==?utf-8?q? default namespace in XPath

Hello, we have implemented it as option 1 based on the "current()" function definition (RFC 7950 sec. 10.1.1): The current() function takes no input parameters and returns a node set with the initial context node as its only member. If this was not intended and actually option 2 is correct, t

[netmod] default namespace in XPath

Hi, sec. 6.4.1 in RFC 7950 says in the second bullet item: Names without a namespace prefix belong to the same namespace as the identifier of the current node. It is unclear what "current node" means: 1. Is it the context node of the XPath expression, or 2. is it the schema node corres