On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:46:32AM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
>> -} else {
>> -printf ("No new mail---and that's not much.\n");
>> }
>
>Shouldn't we still print *something* here, though ("No new mail")?
>Imagine the new user trying to ensure "notmuch new" is working---and
>let's say it's
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:14:15PM -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> cat > Makefile.config < prefix = /usr/local
> bash_completion_dir = /etc/bash_completion.d
>-CFLAGS += ${have_valgrind}
>+CFLAGS += ${have_valgrind} ${strndup} ${getline}
> EOF
This doesn't seem to do much for me, they don't seem
Excerpts from Carl Worth's message of Wed Dec 02 22:36:13 +0100 2009:
> As a side-note, I would recommend against making your auto-tagging
> scripts process only new messages. You can get a much more reliable
> setup by having your auto-tagging scripts apply to the global
> database. And this is no
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:15:07 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> * Much nicer looking presentation, (no more ugly reverse-video or
> underlines on the message summary line).
>
> * More reliable message-visibility buttons, (using RET in the first
> column of a message-summary line now works).
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:39:50 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> But when viewing an actual message, I'm still planning on having notmuch
> just return an arbitrary filename from the list of filenames associated
> with that message. Does anyone see any problem with that? Can you think
> of a case where you
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:02:03 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:27:05 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> It might be a bit blue sky, but if this daemon could (optionally) talk
> IMAP and translate tags into folders on the fly, this would be very
> useful for people who need imap acce
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:39:48 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> I think the right answer here is to fix the input that notmuch is
> getting. Just ensure that each message has a proper In-Reply-To header
> and all should be fine.
On a related note, what about communicating with people who press reply
on a
Excerpts from Dirk Hohndel's message of Fri Dec 11 07:11:04 +0100 2009:
> Is there a workaround?
For now, you can do
notmuch dump somefile
mv Mail/.notmuch /tmp
notmuch new
notmuch restore somefile
Which will re-index all your mail, and restore your tags, as far as the
messages are stil
Excerpts from David Bremner's message of Mon Dec 14 00:21:02 +0100 2009:
> So, do people think this is a reasonable idea to persue?
JSON was actually the first thing I thought of when I first saw the
output of notmuch-show. I think it's a much more natural fit for notmuch
than say, sexps, since mo
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:30:13 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> But I still have a hard time justifying user operations to manipulate
> threading. The whole point of threading is to make it faster to process
> and read messages. But manual operations like joining and splitting
> threads seem like the user
ly think it's a nicer solution than
automatically adding tags based on folder.
Reviewed-by: Marten Veldthuis
--
- Marten
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:18:16 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> I agree that the labels-in-headers approach has some nice advantages. I
> haven't thought through merging of tag lists, but maybe that is no worse
> than other approaches. One thing that worries me a bit is that notmuch
> updates tags of
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:21:54 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> I heard about notmuch mail a few days ago and I started playing with
> it. So far, it makes me very happy, but there are some things that I
> need to learn how to do. I'll start with the most important one:
> tagging incoming messages auto
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:24:10 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> Currently we're replicating all of our documentation both in the man
> page and in the output from "notmuch help". It's annoying to have to
> add everything in two places, but I don't have a good idea for making
> that sharable yet.
>
> Anyo
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:02:18 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> We actually want to let the user *select* an email address from the
> config file, and then automagically set the bcc: flag as
> appropriate. Without that, I'd end up bcc'ing all of my mail through my
> home address, which would end up sen
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:08:22 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> 2. of course, filenames need to be unique. Do we want/have to follow
> the maildir file naming conventions listed at
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
> or is it enough to use the Emacs lisp make-temp-file?
I'd very much prefer a real M
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:12:28 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> What does it do?
>
> - Synchronizes the "S" flag with the "unread" tag (1-way). The
> synchronization direction is decided by using either --sync (change
> maildir flags according to notmuch) or --revsync (change n
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:37:03 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> - Move read files from 'new' to 'cur' folder. At what point is that
>moving typically done in Maildir? When the user has actually looked
>at the mail?
Yes, exactly that.
--
- Marten
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:31:12 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
> Arguably, being patch-centric means that a project has a higher
> barrier of entry, but it also means that if someone wants something,
> they know that they'll have to somehow end up with a patch. The way
> this happens on Git is that yo
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:23:18 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> I don't know ikiwiki that well, but I imagine there is a way (probably
> via a git post-commit hook) to email changes that have been pushed. This
> might be a good way to keep up with what people are changing on the
> site, although sendi
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:44:56 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> The benefit is that there's now a git repository for the website, (with
> source in markdown format), and more importantly, the git repository
> will accept a "git push" without any authentication necessary.
Carl, I'm getting
To git://no
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:36:52 -0500, Matthew Gregg wrote:
> Like this? http://notmuchmail.org/recentchanges/
No, more like this: http://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch-wiki
--
- Marten
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:47:41 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> See this page for details (particularly the "security" and
> "infelicities" sections):
>
> http://ikiwiki.info/tips/untrusted_git_push/
Ah. Probably this section:
So, unless you have the attachment plugin turned on, non-page files
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:31:34 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I'm noticing that notmuch is either not syncing, or not returning in
> searches, duplicate messages that have identical bodies but different
> headers.
This is indeed the correct behaviour of notmuch. There has been some
discussion on i
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:46:32AM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
-} else {
- printf ("No new mail---and that's not much.\n");
}
Shouldn't we still print *something* here, though ("No new mail")?
Imagine the new user trying to ensure "notmuch new" is working---and
let's say it's not, (
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:14:15PM -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
cat > Makefile.config <
This doesn't seem to do much for me, they don't seem to end up in the args
passed to g++. I'm no Makefile wizard, so I got notmuch finally compiling by
simply copy/pasting the ${strndup} and ${getline} fr
Excerpts from Carl Worth's message of Wed Dec 02 22:36:13 +0100 2009:
> As a side-note, I would recommend against making your auto-tagging
> scripts process only new messages. You can get a much more reliable
> setup by having your auto-tagging scripts apply to the global
> database. And this is no
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:15:07 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> * Much nicer looking presentation, (no more ugly reverse-video or
> underlines on the message summary line).
>
> * More reliable message-visibility buttons, (using RET in the first
> column of a message-summary line now works).
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:39:50 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> But when viewing an actual message, I'm still planning on having notmuch
> just return an arbitrary filename from the list of filenames associated
> with that message. Does anyone see any problem with that? Can you think
> of a case where you
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:02:03 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:27:05 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> It might be a bit blue sky, but if this daemon could (optionally) talk
> IMAP and translate tags into folders on the fly, this would be very
> useful for people who need imap acce
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:39:48 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> I think the right answer here is to fix the input that notmuch is
> getting. Just ensure that each message has a proper In-Reply-To header
> and all should be fine.
On a related note, what about communicating with people who press reply
on a
Excerpts from Dirk Hohndel's message of Fri Dec 11 07:11:04 +0100 2009:
> Is there a workaround?
For now, you can do
notmuch dump somefile
mv Mail/.notmuch /tmp
notmuch new
notmuch restore somefile
Which will re-index all your mail, and restore your tags, as far as the
messages are stil
Excerpts from David Bremner's message of Mon Dec 14 00:21:02 +0100 2009:
> So, do people think this is a reasonable idea to persue?
JSON was actually the first thing I thought of when I first saw the
output of notmuch-show. I think it's a much more natural fit for notmuch
than say, sexps, since mo
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:30:13 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> But I still have a hard time justifying user operations to manipulate
> threading. The whole point of threading is to make it faster to process
> and read messages. But manual operations like joining and splitting
> threads seem like the user
ly think it's a nicer solution than
automatically adding tags based on folder.
Reviewed-by: Marten Veldthuis
--
- Marten
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:18:16 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> I agree that the labels-in-headers approach has some nice advantages. I
> haven't thought through merging of tag lists, but maybe that is no worse
> than other approaches. One thing that worries me a bit is that notmuch
> updates tags of
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:21:54 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> I heard about notmuch mail a few days ago and I started playing with
> it. So far, it makes me very happy, but there are some things that I
> need to learn how to do. I'll start with the most important one:
> tagging incoming messages auto
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:24:10 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> Currently we're replicating all of our documentation both in the man
> page and in the output from "notmuch help". It's annoying to have to
> add everything in two places, but I don't have a good idea for making
> that sharable yet.
>
> Anyo
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:02:18 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> We actually want to let the user *select* an email address from the
> config file, and then automagically set the bcc: flag as
> appropriate. Without that, I'd end up bcc'ing all of my mail through my
> home address, which would end up sen
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:08:22 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> 2. of course, filenames need to be unique. Do we want/have to follow
> the maildir file naming conventions listed at
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
> or is it enough to use the Emacs lisp make-temp-file?
I'd very much prefer a real M
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:12:28 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth"
wrote:
> What does it do?
>
> - Synchronizes the "S" flag with the "unread" tag (1-way). The
> synchronization direction is decided by using either --sync (change
> maildir flags according to notmuch) or --revsync (change
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:37:03 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth"
wrote:
> - Move read files from 'new' to 'cur' folder. At what point is that
>moving typically done in Maildir? When the user has actually looked
>at the mail?
Yes, exactly that.
--
- Marten
___
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:31:12 +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Arguably, being patch-centric means that a project has a higher
> barrier of entry, but it also means that if someone wants something,
> they know that they'll have to somehow end up with a patch. The way
> this happens on Git is that you
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:23:18 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> I don't know ikiwiki that well, but I imagine there is a way (probably
> via a git post-commit hook) to email changes that have been pushed. This
> might be a good way to keep up with what people are changing on the
> site, although sendi
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:44:56 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> The benefit is that there's now a git repository for the website, (with
> source in markdown format), and more importantly, the git repository
> will accept a "git push" without any authentication necessary.
Carl, I'm getting
To git://no
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:36:52 -0500, Matthew Gregg wrote:
> Like this? http://notmuchmail.org/recentchanges/
No, more like this: http://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch-wiki
--
- Marten
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:47:41 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> See this page for details (particularly the "security" and
> "infelicities" sections):
>
> http://ikiwiki.info/tips/untrusted_git_push/
Ah. Probably this section:
So, unless you have the attachment plugin turned on, non-page files
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:31:34 -0500, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> I'm noticing that notmuch is either not syncing, or not returning in
> searches, duplicate messages that have identical bodies but different
> headers.
This is indeed the correct behaviour of notmuch. There has been some
discussion on
48 matches
Mail list logo
