On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:46:57 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Did you guys try to address the issue of tag removal at all? I've been
> trying to decide if this is something we need to worry about or not.
> For instance, if cworth pushed a tag ".needs-review", you would probably
> want to hav
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:46:57 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Did you guys try to address the issue of tag removal at all? I've been
> trying to decide if this is something we need to worry about or not.
> For instance, if cworth pushed a tag ".needs-review", you would probably
> want to ha
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:20:00 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> After a conversation with David last year about bug-tracking, I worked
> up a rough python-based prototype of this. It worked in terms of
> namespaces, so Carl could associate the namespace "public" with a list
> of tags he publishes to
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:20:00 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
wrote:
> After a conversation with David last year about bug-tracking, I worked
> up a rough python-based prototype of this. It worked in terms of
> namespaces, so Carl could associate the namespace "public" with a list
> of tags he publishes to
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:28:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> I've been thinking about this more and it really seems we need a way to
> just share tags. What if we had a way to export all the tags for a set
> of messages as a notmuch dump file, that could just be piped into
> notmuch to mod
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:28:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> I've been thinking about this more and it really seems we need a way to
> just share tags. What if we had a way to export all the tags for a set
> of messages as a notmuch dump file, that could just be piped into
> notmuch to mo
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 05:17:27 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Hopefully, someone will provide me with a good way to publish my queue
> soon, ("notmuch search --output=html" ?), and then communication like
> this will be a bit easier. ;-)
I've been thinking about this more and it really seems we need a
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 05:17:27 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Hopefully, someone will provide me with a good way to publish my queue
> soon, ("notmuch search --output=html" ?), and then communication like
> this will be a bit easier. ;-)
I've been thinking about this more and it really seems we need a
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:35:40 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:27:42 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > From a quick rebase of your release-candidate branch and a comparison
> > with what I have queued it looks like only the following commits are
> > left on your branch and
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:35:40 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:27:42 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > From a quick rebase of your release-candidate branch and a comparison
> > with what I have queued it looks like only the following commits are
> > left on your branch and n
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:27:42 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> From a quick rebase of your release-candidate branch and a comparison
> with what I have queued it looks like only the following commits are
> left on your branch and not in my email queue:
>
> emacs: update notmuch-crypto-process-mime c
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:27:42 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> From a quick rebase of your release-candidate branch and a comparison
> with what I have queued it looks like only the following commits are
> left on your branch and not in my email queue:
>
> emacs: update notmuch-crypto-process-mime c
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:43:31 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Hi, folks. I have pushed a new version of the release-candidate/0.6
> branch to my repo [0]. It is all reworked on top of notmuch/master [1],
> and includes:
...
> cworth: do you want to review this for the new release? We're v
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:43:31 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Hi, folks. I have pushed a new version of the release-candidate/0.6
> branch to my repo [0]. It is all reworked on top of notmuch/master [1],
> and includes:
...
> cworth: do you want to review this for the new release? We're ve
Hi, folks. I have pushed a new version of the release-candidate/0.6
branch to my repo [0]. It is all reworked on top of notmuch/master [1],
and includes:
* the miscellaneous fixes/improvements patch series starting at
id:"1306619520-25730-2-git-send-email-jroll...@finestructure.net"
* the notm
Hi, folks. I have pushed a new version of the release-candidate/0.6
branch to my repo [0]. It is all reworked on top of notmuch/master [1],
and includes:
* the miscellaneous fixes/improvements patch series starting at
id:"1306619520-25730-2-git-send-email-jrollins at finestructure.net"
* the n
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Austin: speaking of which, would you mind rebasing that patch series
> against notmuch/master at cb8418784c21155ffea79cce8409a7ea3c546937 and
> sending that to the list again? ?That might help push Carl to merge that
> stuff sooner. ?
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Austin: speaking of which, would you mind rebasing that patch series
> against notmuch/master at cb8418784c21155ffea79cce8409a7ea3c546937 and
> sending that to the list again? That might help push Carl to merge that
> stuff sooner.
On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:51:35 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> So what follows is a patch series for a bunch of miscellaneous patches
> that should be included in 0.6. Most of them were originally part of
> the release-candiate/0.6 branch, and they are here rebased on top of
> notmuch/master
On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:51:35 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> So what follows is a patch series for a bunch of miscellaneous patches
> that should be included in 0.6. Most of them were originally part of
> the release-candiate/0.6 branch, and they are here rebased on top of
> notmuch/master
So what follows is a patch series for a bunch of miscellaneous patches
that should be included in 0.6. Most of them were originally part of
the release-candiate/0.6 branch, and they are here rebased on top of
notmuch/master at cb8418784c21155ffea79cce8409a7ea3c546937, which
includes all the multip
So what follows is a patch series for a bunch of miscellaneous patches
that should be included in 0.6. Most of them were originally part of
the release-candiate/0.6 branch, and they are here rebased on top of
notmuch/master at cb8418784c21155ffea79cce8409a7ea3c546937, which
includes all the multip
22 matches
Mail list logo
