RE: [NSWolves] Timing

[Rog & Reet]

Apart from the definite articles used you've quoted him word for word.
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 3:02 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Timing
 
I doubt Mick said "Whatever you do, don't pass the ball around.  Just boot
it up the pitch"


 
On 15 February 2012 14:47, Rog & Reet  wrote:
You didn't expect them to want a change from hoofball?
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 1:47 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Timing
 
When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat?
 
Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with enough
time to get a grip before Newcastle.
 
There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you were
manager.  The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same team but
tell them to play better.  There must be more to football management hadn't
there?
-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!
-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!
 
-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] Timing

[Steven Millward]

I doubt Mick said "Whatever you do, don't pass the ball around.  Just boot
it up the pitch"



On 15 February 2012 14:47, Rog & Reet  wrote:

>  You didn’t expect them to want a change from hoofball?
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 15 February 2012 1:47 PM
> *To:* nswolves
> *Subject:* [NSWolves] Timing
>
> ** **
>
> When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat?
>
>  
>
> Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with enough
> time to get a grip before Newcastle.
>
>  
>
> There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you
> were manager.  The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same team
> but tell them to play better.  There must be more to football management
> hadn't there?
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

RE: [NSWolves] Timing

[Rog & Reet]

You didn't expect them to want a change from hoofball?
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 1:47 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Timing
 
When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat?
 
Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with enough
time to get a grip before Newcastle.
 
There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you were
manager.  The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same team but
tell them to play better.  There must be more to football management hadn't
there?
-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

RE: [NSWolves] Timing

[Rog & Reet]

The What Would You Do thread is the best on MM in ages.
Great to have happy people posting again.
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 1:47 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Timing
 
When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat?
 
Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with enough
time to get a grip before Newcastle.
 
There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you were
manager.  The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same team but
tell them to play better.  There must be more to football management hadn't
there?
-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] Timing [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Steven Millward]

In that analysis I shared with you all there was something that I didn't
point out that I thought someone might spot.  The clubs that had
outperformed wages consistently in recent years had all been those that had
come from Championship to Premiership with the same manager.  Bolton with
Allardyce, Charlton with Curbishley and Birmingham under Bruce.

It's a double edged finding.  It suggested to me that continuity is
important but that managers forge their reputations based on that.  All
three are really trading off that one good stint with a club where they had
the chance to build a team of their own.  I thought that maybe Morgan had
already spotted this and so was due to keep the faith.

On 15 February 2012 14:07, Morris, Lee SGT wrote:

> **
>
> *UNCLASSIFIED*
> Whoever they choose, I'd say there will be a pretty big bonus involved for
> keeping us up.
>
> So many names being banded about
>
> Bruce is a real chance...moving back to the Midlands apparrantly
>
> Curbishly---a lot of people favourite, certainly did the business with
> Charlton for a number of years
>
> I reckon either Curbishly or someone totally out of the blue...this little
> situation must have been thought about for quite some timeannouncement
> by the weekend I reckon.
>
> *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
> and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If
> you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the
> sender and delete the email.
>  --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 15 February 2012 12:54
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Timing
>
>  I wouldn't be surprised if there's an announcement before the end of the
> week. Mick's dismissal was not just a reaction to the game on Sunday and so
> I'd imagine there's been some contact made already with likely candidates
> sounded out.
>
> I read an interesting article flipping the 'Who would your choice of
> manager be' question on its head to say 'Assume you get a call from Moxey
> saying you can't pick the new manager, but you are able to give 1 name to
> be scratcehd from the candidate list'.
>
> Given what I've seen so far as the more realistic candidates, that would
> be Steve Bruce for me.
>
>  --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 15 February 2012 1:47 PM
> *To:* nswolves
> *Subject:* [NSWolves] Timing
>
>  When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat?
>
> Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with enough
> time to get a grip before Newcastle.
>
> There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you
> were manager.  The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same team
> but tell them to play better.  There must be more to football management
> hadn't there?
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> [image: Logo]
>
> Before printing, please consider the environment
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only
> to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may
> contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is
> waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime
> Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this
> e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of
> the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you
> receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system
> and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this
> e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] Timing

[Steven Millward]

We agree on that one.

Bruce was sacked under circumstances similar to Mick.  It's odd how being
sacked seems to absolve people of shortcomings and they are back in the
jobs market.

If you scratch Bruce, I'll scratch Warnock.

I hope they go for someone from Europe or someone young who is unexpected.
>From what Moxey says that won't be the case though.

On 15 February 2012 13:53, LEESE Matthew wrote:

> **
> I wouldn't be surprised if there's an announcement before the end of the
> week. Mick's dismissal was not just a reaction to the game on Sunday and so
> I'd imagine there's been some contact made already with likely candidates
> sounded out.
>
> I read an interesting article flipping the 'Who would your choice of
> manager be' question on its head to say 'Assume you get a call from Moxey
> saying you can't pick the new manager, but you are able to give 1 name to
> be scratcehd from the candidate list'.
>
> Given what I've seen so far as the more realistic candidates, that would
> be Steve Bruce for me.
>
>  --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 15 February 2012 1:47 PM
> *To:* nswolves
> *Subject:* [NSWolves] Timing
>
>  When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat?
>
> Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with enough
> time to get a grip before Newcastle.
>
> There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you
> were manager.  The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same team
> but tell them to play better.  There must be more to football management
> hadn't there?
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> [image: Logo]
>
> Before printing, please consider the environment
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only
> to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may
> contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is
> waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime
> Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this
> e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of
> the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you
> receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system
> and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this
> e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

RE: [NSWolves] Timing [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Morris, Lee SGT]

UNCLASSIFIED

Whoever they choose, I'd say there will be a pretty big bonus involved
for keeping us up.
 
So many names being banded about
 
Bruce is a real chance...moving back to the Midlands apparrantly
 
Curbishly---a lot of people favourite, certainly did the business with
Charlton for a number of years
 
I reckon either Curbishly or someone totally out of the blue...this
little situation must have been thought about for quite some
timeannouncement by the weekend I reckon.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.




From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 12:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Timing


I wouldn't be surprised if there's an announcement before the end of the
week. Mick's dismissal was not just a reaction to the game on Sunday and
so I'd imagine there's been some contact made already with likely
candidates sounded out.
 
I read an interesting article flipping the 'Who would your choice of
manager be' question on its head to say 'Assume you get a call from
Moxey saying you can't pick the new manager, but you are able to give 1
name to be scratcehd from the candidate list'.
 
Given what I've seen so far as the more realistic candidates, that would
be Steve Bruce for me.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 1:47 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Timing


When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat?
 
Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with
enough time to get a grip before Newcastle.
 
There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you
were manager.  The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same
team but tell them to play better.  There must be more to football
management hadn't there?

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!


 Logo 

Before printing, please consider the environment

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only
to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may
contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and
Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised
alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the
views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose,
copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient.

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

RE: [NSWolves] Timing

[LEESE Matthew]

I wouldn't be surprised if there's an announcement before the end of the week. 
Mick's dismissal was not just a reaction to the game on Sunday and so I'd 
imagine there's been some contact made already with likely candidates sounded 
out.

I read an interesting article flipping the 'Who would your choice of manager 
be' question on its head to say 'Assume you get a call from Moxey saying you 
can't pick the new manager, but you are able to give 1 name to be scratcehd 
from the candidate list'.

Given what I've seen so far as the more realistic candidates, that would be 
Steve Bruce for me.


From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 1:47 PM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Timing

When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat?

Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with enough time 
to get a grip before Newcastle.

There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you were 
manager.  The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same team but tell 
them to play better.  There must be more to football management hadn't there?

--
Boo! Clipboard out!

Before printing, please consider the environment

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be 
read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally 
privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by 
any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not 
responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to 
it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are 
not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please 
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not 
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended 
recipient.

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

[NSWolves] Timing

[Steven Millward]

When do people think we'll appoint a new manager/scapegoat?

Presumably in the next few days so that they can take control with enough
time to get a grip before Newcastle.

There's an interesting thread on Mol Mix about what you would do if you
were manager.  The basic gist of it is that people would pick the same team
but tell them to play better.  There must be more to football management
hadn't there?

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

RE: [NSWolves] He's in Steve's tent

[Jeremy Tonks]

Scary - Roger Johnson backs Steven Millward!!

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 10:22 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] He's in Steve's tent

 

Roger Johnson, the Wolves captain, has suggested that the players are
largely responsible for McCarthy's dismissal. Johnson has endured a poor
season since joining from Birmingham City in the summer and when he was
asked how much blame the players should take for McCarthy's sacking, he
replied: "All of it. The manager can maybe take five to 10%."

 

Young Roger not only gives 110% on the pitch but in the blame game as well.


-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] He's in Steve's tent

[Steven Millward]

Players win football matches shocker.  Anyone outside that tent must be mental

On 15/02/2012, at 10:22 AM, "Rog & Reet"  wrote:

> Roger Johnson, the Wolves captain, has suggested that the players are largely 
> responsible for McCarthy's dismissal. Johnson has endured a poor season since 
> joining from Birmingham City in the summer and when he was asked how much 
> blame the players should take for McCarthy's sacking, he replied: "All of it. 
> The manager can maybe take five to 10%.”
> 
>  
> 
> Young Roger not only gives 110% on the pitch but in the blame game as well.  
> 
> -- 
> Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

RE: [NSWolves] He's in Steve's tent [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Morris, Lee SGT]

UNCLASSIFIED
So based on the "blame chart" how many more points would we have, if we
had a blameless manager. 

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.



From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 09:22
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] He's in Steve's tent


Roger Johnson, the Wolves captain, has suggested that the players are
largely responsible for McCarthy's dismissal. Johnson has endured a poor
season since joining from Birmingham City in the summer and when he was
asked how much blame the players should take for McCarthy's sacking, he
replied: "All of it. The manager can maybe take five to 10%."
 
Young Roger not only gives 110% on the pitch but in the blame game as
well.  
-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

[NSWolves] He's in Steve's tent

[Rog & Reet]

Roger Johnson, the Wolves captain, has suggested that the players are
largely responsible for McCarthy's dismissal. Johnson has endured a poor
season since joining from Birmingham City in the summer and when he was
asked how much blame the players should take for McCarthy's sacking, he
replied: "All of it. The manager can maybe take five to 10%."
 
Young Roger not only gives 110% on the pitch but in the blame game as well.

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[Jeremy Tonks]

Hereford? The team to watch is Shrewsbury!!! They're well on the up and up.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Hart
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 9:01 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

 

Wow with an optimistic outlook like that you would be better off following
Hereford united ! 

Sent from my iPhone


On 14/02/2012, at 8:14 PM, Steven Millward  wrote:

Here's how I see it playing out.

*   New manager appointed who starts playing different players.
*   Realises after a few games that the players on the fringe of the
team were no good after all and goes back to the original players that Mick
used to play.
*   Wolves sink into the relegation zone and players start lining up a
move for next season having no loyalty to Morgan or the club anymore.
*   Wolves get relegated and sell the best players, some to Mick who has
just got Leeds promoted via the playoffs.
*   Manager has no idea or stomach for getting promotion on a limited
budget imposed by Morgan.
*   Manager gets sacked in November with Wolves in the bottom half.
*   Morgan starts taking money out of the club and then sells it on
whilst appointing and dismissing a range of different managers
*   Wolves flirt with the bottom end of the division and eventually get
relegated after the new owners are shown to be insolvent
*   Mick takes Leeds to a cup win.

 

 

On 14 February 2012 19:47, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Keep us up?

I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and Citeh
still have to play one another).

Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that plague
the game.

 

Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12
games. 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of paul 
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM
To: Nsw Wolves


Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

 

I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!

Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra

  _  

From: "Rog & Reet"  

Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com 

Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100

To: 

ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com 

Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?

 

How long does the average honeymoon last?

If it's 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

 

Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show some
magnamimity over a vanquished foe?

 

I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the facts.

 

I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed by
a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you have to sack
your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this season.

On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages. Anyone
know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our wage
bill?

Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new
manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams
performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.

Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?

Sent from my iPhone

--
Boo! Clipboard out!

 

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

 

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[Steven Millward]

No, Im just going to enjoy being negative about everything

On 14 February 2012 21:29, paul  wrote:

> **
> Drinking problem, probably. Gambling problem, never. Do we have a bet?
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
> --
> *From: * Steven Millward 
> *Sender: * nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:15:12 +1100
> *To: *
> *ReplyTo: * nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>
> I'm expecting Bates to khark it and new rich owners to take over after
> Mick starts.
>
> I think you have a drinking-gambling problem Paul.
>
> On 14 February 2012 21:07, paul  wrote:
>
>> **
>> Dream on!
>> Leeds wage bill is miniscule compared to us! But happy to bet a case of
>> beer on your predictions.
>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
>> --
>> *From: * Steven Millward 
>> *Sender: * nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:14:25 +1100
>> *To: *
>> *ReplyTo: * nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>
>> Here's how I see it playing out.
>>
>>- New manager appointed who starts playing different players.
>>- Realises after a few games that the players on the fringe of the
>>team were no good after all and goes back to the original players that 
>> Mick
>>used to play.
>>- Wolves sink into the relegation zone and players start lining up a
>>move for next season having no loyalty to Morgan or the club anymore.
>>- Wolves get relegated and sell the best players, some to Mick who
>>has just got Leeds promoted via the playoffs.
>>- Manager has no idea or stomach for getting promotion on a limited
>>budget imposed by Morgan.
>>- Manager gets sacked in November with Wolves in the bottom half.
>>- Morgan starts taking money out of the club and then sells it on
>>whilst appointing and dismissing a range of different managers
>>- Wolves flirt with the bottom end of the division and eventually get
>>relegated after the new owners are shown to be insolvent
>>- Mick takes Leeds to a cup win.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14 February 2012 19:47, Rog & Reet  wrote:
>>
>>> Keep us up?
>>>
>>> I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and
>>> Citeh still have to play one another).
>>>
>>> Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that
>>> plague the game.
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12
>>> games. 
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
>>> Behalf Of *paul
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM
>>> *To:* Nsw Wolves
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!
>>>
>>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
>>> --
>>>
>>> *From: *"Rog & Reet"  
>>>
>>> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com 
>>>
>>> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100
>>>
>>> *To: *
>>>
>>> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com 
>>>
>>> *Subject: *RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> How long does the average honeymoon last?
>>>
>>> If it’s 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more
>>> managers.
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
>>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show
>>> some magnamimity over a vanquished foe?
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the
>>> facts.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is
>>> followed by a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you
>>> have to sack your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this
>>> season.
>>>
>>> On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>> I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages.
>>> Anyone know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our
>>> wage bill?
>>>
>>> Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new
>>> manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams
>>> performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.
>>>
>>> Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> --
>>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> --
>>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>
>  --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboar

Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[paul]

Drinking problem, probably. Gambling problem, never. Do we have a bet? 
Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra

-Original Message-
From: Steven Millward 
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:15:12 
To: 
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

I'm expecting Bates to khark it and new rich owners to take over after Mick
starts.

I think you have a drinking-gambling problem Paul.

On 14 February 2012 21:07, paul  wrote:

> **
> Dream on!
> Leeds wage bill is miniscule compared to us! But happy to bet a case of
> beer on your predictions.
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
> --
> *From: * Steven Millward 
> *Sender: * nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:14:25 +1100
> *To: *
> *ReplyTo: * nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>
> Here's how I see it playing out.
>
>- New manager appointed who starts playing different players.
>- Realises after a few games that the players on the fringe of the
>team were no good after all and goes back to the original players that Mick
>used to play.
>- Wolves sink into the relegation zone and players start lining up a
>move for next season having no loyalty to Morgan or the club anymore.
>- Wolves get relegated and sell the best players, some to Mick who has
>just got Leeds promoted via the playoffs.
>- Manager has no idea or stomach for getting promotion on a limited
>budget imposed by Morgan.
>- Manager gets sacked in November with Wolves in the bottom half.
>- Morgan starts taking money out of the club and then sells it on
>whilst appointing and dismissing a range of different managers
>- Wolves flirt with the bottom end of the division and eventually get
>relegated after the new owners are shown to be insolvent
>- Mick takes Leeds to a cup win.
>
>
>
> On 14 February 2012 19:47, Rog & Reet  wrote:
>
>> Keep us up?
>>
>> I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and Citeh
>> still have to play one another).
>>
>> Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that
>> plague the game.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12
>> games. 
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *paul
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM
>> *To:* Nsw Wolves
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!
>>
>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
>> --
>>
>> *From: *"Rog & Reet"  
>>
>> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com 
>>
>> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100
>>
>> *To: *
>>
>> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com 
>>
>> *Subject: *RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> How long does the average honeymoon last?
>>
>> If it’s 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers.
>> 
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show
>> some magnamimity over a vanquished foe?
>>
>>  
>>
>> I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the
>> facts.
>>
>>  
>>
>> I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed
>> by a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you have to
>> sack your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this season.***
>> *
>>
>> On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:*
>> ***
>>
>> I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages.
>> Anyone know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our
>> wage bill?
>>
>> Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new
>> manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams
>> performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.
>>
>> Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>
>  --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[Steven Millward]

I'm expecting Bates to khark it and new rich owners to take over after Mick
starts.

I think you have a drinking-gambling problem Paul.

On 14 February 2012 21:07, paul  wrote:

> **
> Dream on!
> Leeds wage bill is miniscule compared to us! But happy to bet a case of
> beer on your predictions.
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
> --
> *From: * Steven Millward 
> *Sender: * nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:14:25 +1100
> *To: *
> *ReplyTo: * nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>
> Here's how I see it playing out.
>
>- New manager appointed who starts playing different players.
>- Realises after a few games that the players on the fringe of the
>team were no good after all and goes back to the original players that Mick
>used to play.
>- Wolves sink into the relegation zone and players start lining up a
>move for next season having no loyalty to Morgan or the club anymore.
>- Wolves get relegated and sell the best players, some to Mick who has
>just got Leeds promoted via the playoffs.
>- Manager has no idea or stomach for getting promotion on a limited
>budget imposed by Morgan.
>- Manager gets sacked in November with Wolves in the bottom half.
>- Morgan starts taking money out of the club and then sells it on
>whilst appointing and dismissing a range of different managers
>- Wolves flirt with the bottom end of the division and eventually get
>relegated after the new owners are shown to be insolvent
>- Mick takes Leeds to a cup win.
>
>
>
> On 14 February 2012 19:47, Rog & Reet  wrote:
>
>> Keep us up?
>>
>> I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and Citeh
>> still have to play one another).
>>
>> Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that
>> plague the game.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12
>> games. 
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *paul
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM
>> *To:* Nsw Wolves
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!
>>
>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
>> --
>>
>> *From: *"Rog & Reet"  
>>
>> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com 
>>
>> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100
>>
>> *To: *
>>
>> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com 
>>
>> *Subject: *RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> How long does the average honeymoon last?
>>
>> If it’s 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers.
>> 
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show
>> some magnamimity over a vanquished foe?
>>
>>  
>>
>> I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the
>> facts.
>>
>>  
>>
>> I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed
>> by a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you have to
>> sack your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this season.***
>> *
>>
>> On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:*
>> ***
>>
>> I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages.
>> Anyone know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our
>> wage bill?
>>
>> Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new
>> manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams
>> performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.
>>
>> Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>
>  --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[paul]

Dream on!
Leeds wage bill is miniscule compared to us! But happy to bet a case of beer on 
your predictions.
Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra

-Original Message-
From: Steven Millward 
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:14:25 
To: 
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

Here's how I see it playing out.

   - New manager appointed who starts playing different players.
   - Realises after a few games that the players on the fringe of the team
   were no good after all and goes back to the original players that Mick used
   to play.
   - Wolves sink into the relegation zone and players start lining up a
   move for next season having no loyalty to Morgan or the club anymore.
   - Wolves get relegated and sell the best players, some to Mick who has
   just got Leeds promoted via the playoffs.
   - Manager has no idea or stomach for getting promotion on a limited
   budget imposed by Morgan.
   - Manager gets sacked in November with Wolves in the bottom half.
   - Morgan starts taking money out of the club and then sells it on whilst
   appointing and dismissing a range of different managers
   - Wolves flirt with the bottom end of the division and eventually get
   relegated after the new owners are shown to be insolvent
   - Mick takes Leeds to a cup win.



On 14 February 2012 19:47, Rog & Reet  wrote:

> Keep us up?
>
> I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and Citeh
> still have to play one another).
>
> Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that plague
> the game.
>
> ** **
>
> Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12
> games. 
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *paul
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM
> *To:* Nsw Wolves
>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>
> ** **
>
> I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!
>
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
> --
>
> *From: *"Rog & Reet"  
>
> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com 
>
> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100
>
> *To: *
>
> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com 
>
> *Subject: *RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>
> ** **
>
> How long does the average honeymoon last?
>
> If it’s 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers.
> 
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>
> ** **
>
> Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show
> some magnamimity over a vanquished foe?
>
>  
>
> I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the
> facts.
>
>  
>
> I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed
> by a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you have to
> sack your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this season.
>
> On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:**
> **
>
> I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages.
> Anyone know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our
> wage bill?
>
> Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new
> manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams
> performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.
>
> Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[Paul Hart]

Wow with an optimistic outlook like that you would be better off following 
Hereford united ! 

Sent from my iPhone

On 14/02/2012, at 8:14 PM, Steven Millward  wrote:

> Here's how I see it playing out.
> New manager appointed who starts playing different players.
> Realises after a few games that the players on the fringe of the team were no 
> good after all and goes back to the original players that Mick used to play.
> Wolves sink into the relegation zone and players start lining up a move for 
> next season having no loyalty to Morgan or the club anymore.
> Wolves get relegated and sell the best players, some to Mick who has just got 
> Leeds promoted via the playoffs.
> Manager has no idea or stomach for getting promotion on a limited budget 
> imposed by Morgan.
> Manager gets sacked in November with Wolves in the bottom half.
> Morgan starts taking money out of the club and then sells it on whilst 
> appointing and dismissing a range of different managers
> Wolves flirt with the bottom end of the division and eventually get relegated 
> after the new owners are shown to be insolvent
> Mick takes Leeds to a cup win.
> 
> 
> 
> On 14 February 2012 19:47, Rog & Reet  wrote:
> Keep us up?
> 
> I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and Citeh 
> still have to play one another).
> 
> Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that plague 
> the game.
> 
>  
> 
> Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12 games.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
> Of paul 
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM
> To: Nsw Wolves
> 
> 
> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>  
> 
> I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
> 
> From: "Rog & Reet" 
> 
> Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> 
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100
> 
> To: 
> 
> ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> 
> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?
> 
>  
> 
> How long does the average honeymoon last?
> 
> If it’s 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers.
> 
>  
> 
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
> Of Steven Millward
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
> 
>  
> 
> Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show some 
> magnamimity over a vanquished foe?
> 
>  
> 
> I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the facts.
> 
>  
> 
> I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed by 
> a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you have to sack 
> your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this season.
> 
> On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:
> 
> I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages. Anyone 
> know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our wage 
> bill?
> 
> Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new 
> manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams 
> performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.
> 
> Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> Boo! Clipboard out!
> 
> -- 
> Boo! Clipboard out!
> 
> -- 
> Boo! Clipboard out!
> 
> -- 
> Boo! Clipboard out!
> 
> -- 
> Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[Jeremy Tonks]

There's nothing there that surprises me?

Where are the Bhatti bros these days?

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 8:14 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

 

Here's how I see it playing out.

*   New manager appointed who starts playing different players.
*   Realises after a few games that the players on the fringe of the
team were no good after all and goes back to the original players that Mick
used to play.
*   Wolves sink into the relegation zone and players start lining up a
move for next season having no loyalty to Morgan or the club anymore.
*   Wolves get relegated and sell the best players, some to Mick who has
just got Leeds promoted via the playoffs.
*   Manager has no idea or stomach for getting promotion on a limited
budget imposed by Morgan.
*   Manager gets sacked in November with Wolves in the bottom half.
*   Morgan starts taking money out of the club and then sells it on
whilst appointing and dismissing a range of different managers
*   Wolves flirt with the bottom end of the division and eventually get
relegated after the new owners are shown to be insolvent
*   Mick takes Leeds to a cup win.

 

 

On 14 February 2012 19:47, Rog & Reet  wrote:

Keep us up?

I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and Citeh
still have to play one another).

Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that plague
the game.

 

Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12
games. 

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of paul 
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM
To: Nsw Wolves


Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

 

I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!

Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra

  _  

From: "Rog & Reet"  

Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com 

Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100

To: 

ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com 

Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?

 

How long does the average honeymoon last?

If it's 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

 

Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show some
magnamimity over a vanquished foe?

 

I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the facts.

 

I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed by
a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you have to sack
your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this season.

On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:

I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages. Anyone
know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our wage
bill?

Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new
manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams
performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.

Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?

Sent from my iPhone

--
Boo! Clipboard out!

 

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

 

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[Steven Millward]

Here's how I see it playing out.

   - New manager appointed who starts playing different players.
   - Realises after a few games that the players on the fringe of the team
   were no good after all and goes back to the original players that Mick used
   to play.
   - Wolves sink into the relegation zone and players start lining up a
   move for next season having no loyalty to Morgan or the club anymore.
   - Wolves get relegated and sell the best players, some to Mick who has
   just got Leeds promoted via the playoffs.
   - Manager has no idea or stomach for getting promotion on a limited
   budget imposed by Morgan.
   - Manager gets sacked in November with Wolves in the bottom half.
   - Morgan starts taking money out of the club and then sells it on whilst
   appointing and dismissing a range of different managers
   - Wolves flirt with the bottom end of the division and eventually get
   relegated after the new owners are shown to be insolvent
   - Mick takes Leeds to a cup win.



On 14 February 2012 19:47, Rog & Reet  wrote:

> Keep us up?
>
> I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and Citeh
> still have to play one another).
>
> Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that plague
> the game.
>
> ** **
>
> Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12
> games. 
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *paul
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM
> *To:* Nsw Wolves
>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>
> ** **
>
> I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!
>
> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
> --
>
> *From: *"Rog & Reet"  
>
> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com 
>
> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100
>
> *To: *
>
> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com 
>
> *Subject: *RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>
> ** **
>
> How long does the average honeymoon last?
>
> If it’s 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers.
> 
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>
> ** **
>
> Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show
> some magnamimity over a vanquished foe?
>
>  
>
> I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the
> facts.
>
>  
>
> I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed
> by a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you have to
> sack your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this season.
>
> On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:**
> **
>
> I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages.
> Anyone know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our
> wage bill?
>
> Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new
> manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams
> performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.
>
> Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[Rog & Reet]

Keep us up?
I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and Citeh
still have to play one another).
Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that plague
the game.
 
Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12
games. 
 
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of paul 
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM
To: Nsw Wolves
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
 
I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!
Sent via BlackBerryR from Telstra
  _  

From: "Rog & Reet"  
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100
To: 
ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?
 
How long does the average honeymoon last?
If it's 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers.
 
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
 
Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show some
magnamimity over a vanquished foe?
 
I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the facts.
 
I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed by
a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you have to sack
your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this season.
On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:
I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages. Anyone
know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our wage
bill?

Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new
manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams
performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.

Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?

Sent from my iPhone

--
Boo! Clipboard out!
 
-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!
-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!
-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[Steven Millward]

Sorry, actually 12 games.  So three managers per season required.

On 14 February 2012 19:00, Steven Millward  wrote:

> Funnily enough it is actually six games.
>
>
> On 14 February 2012 17:03, Rog & Reet  wrote:
>
>> How long does the average honeymoon last?
>>
>> If it’s 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers.
>> 
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
>>
>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show
>> some magnamimity over a vanquished foe?
>>
>>  
>>
>> I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the
>> facts.
>>
>>  
>>
>> I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed
>> by a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you have to
>> sack your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this season.***
>> *
>>
>> On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:*
>> ***
>>
>> I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages.
>> Anyone know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our
>> wage bill?
>>
>> Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new
>> manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams
>> performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.
>>
>> Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>
>

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?

[Steven Millward]

Funnily enough it is actually six games.

On 14 February 2012 17:03, Rog & Reet  wrote:

> How long does the average honeymoon last?
>
> If it’s 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers.
> 
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?
>
> ** **
>
> Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show
> some magnamimity over a vanquished foe?
>
>  
>
> I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the
> facts.
>
>  
>
> I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed
> by a revertion to the previous position.  The only problem is you have to
> sack your manager each season.  Maybe it will work for us this season.
>
> On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry  wrote:**
> **
>
> I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages.
> Anyone know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our
> wage bill?
>
> Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new
> manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams
> performance?  I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone.
>
> Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!