://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg63937.html). (Their
issues with stopper have been resolved. In MKIV it is numberstopper.)
Here is an MWE demonstrating the problem. It compiles cleanly, but the
separator remains the default period. With MKII, it generates a figure
with a hyphen
regards: OK
On 11 avr. 2014, at 05:48, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Jannik,
You are right. \nabla looks much nicer and is placed correctly. (I
still think the \triangledown placement is slightly off.)
My environment files from MkII
Jannik,
You are right. \nabla looks much nicer and is placed correctly. (I
still think the \triangledown placement is slightly off.)
My environment files from MkII days have \def\nabla{\triangledown}, so I
never tried the true \nabla until your suggestion.
Thank you.
-Sanjoy
Jannik Voges
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Jannik,
You are right. \nabla looks much nicer and is placed correctly. (I
still think the \triangledown placement is slightly off.)
My environment files from MkII days have \def\nabla{\triangledown}, so I
never tried the true \nabla until your
[alternative=apa] %or any other style
\starttext
\stoptext
++
This can be processed with mkii or mkiv. It generates a lot of auxiliary files,
including an empty pdf, but the only important one is bbl-generator.bbl,
which you rename to ps.bbl or ss.bbl according
++
This can be processed with mkii or mkiv. It generates a lot of
auxiliary files, including an empty pdf, but the only important one is
bbl-generator.bbl, which you rename to ps.bbl or ss.bbl according to
which of the two bib-files you used.(= did not comment
key is changed from none to nonumber or
just deleted, then the regularref page reference works.
It also works with MkII (with or without none), so I am guessing that
it is a bug in MkIV.
-Sanjoy
___
If your question
. (But the workaround
reference does work.)
If the figure's location key is changed from none to nonumber or
just deleted, then the regularref page reference works.
It also works with MkII (with or without none), so I am guessing that
it is a bug in MkIV.
more a side effect .. in mkii we store refs
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl writes:
more a side effect .. in mkii we store refs independently, in mkiv they
can also travel with other properties (like lists and here we have no
list entry
in the next beta this will work ok
That make sense. I will try it out.
I have found a few other
\currentvideo and \incrementvideo are undefined
in mkii labels were also used for some mechanisms but that has changed
which is why i rmeoved some of these auto-generated commands
in fact, \current* is somewhat dangerous as there can be other
\current's already
i've added the current one
If anyone has a suggestion for putting enumeration texts toward the
right edge of the left margin, I would be grateful.
In MkII enumerations, I would put a triangle (fig.2) in the left margin
using
\defineenumeration
[pause]
[title=no,
text={\externalfigure[fig.2][height=1em
Am 30.03.2014 um 20:00 schrieb Sanjoy Mahajan san...@mit.edu:
If anyone has a suggestion for putting enumeration texts toward the
right edge of the left margin, I would be grateful.
In MkII enumerations, I would put a triangle (fig.2) in the left margin
using
\defineenumeration
[pause
we have a more modern implementation in the next beta
I tested the following with various flavors:
$
x\mathstrut_{3} x_{3}
x^3 x\mathstrut^3
x^\circ x\mathstrut^\circ
20\mathstrut^\circ 20^\circ
$
Flavors that I tried:
2014.03.27 MkIV
2014.02.14 MkIV
2013.06.07 MkII (from latest beta
page:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Using_Graphics#Flow_text_around_a_picture
There are some issues:
- \starthanging doesn’t accept parameters (using \setuphanging for every second
picture is evil)
- As you can see in wiki, the picture stands on the first line of the text.
This is a MkII
in wiki, the picture stands on the first line of the text.
This is a MkII problem, it works with MkIV.
- If you try several paragraphs or \startlines, then only the first paragraph
flows.
The hanging environment in MkII isn’t the same as the hanging in MkIV. The
original name for the environment
Am 2014-03-24 um 14:11 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com:
- \starthanging doesn’t accept parameters (using \setuphanging for every
second picture is evil)
- As you can see in wiki, the picture stands on the first line of the text.
This is a MkII problem, it works
stands on the first line of the text.
This is a MkII problem, it works with MkIV.
- If you try several paragraphs or \startlines, then only the first
paragraph flows.
The hanging environment in MkII isn’t the same as the hanging in MkIV. The
original name for the environment
was hang
Hi Sanjoy,
I agree with you to say that the position of subscripts and superscripts in
mkiv is not perfect: the same remark applies to the position of the derivative
sign « prime » as $u’(t)$.
Actually in mkii (and also in plain TeX) the positions of the superscripts in
your example
On 3/22/2014 8:17 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Sanjoy,
I agree with you to say that the position of subscripts and superscripts in
mkiv is not perfect: the same remark applies to the position of the derivative
sign « prime » as $u’(t)$.
Actually in mkii (and also in plain TeX) the positions
with the layout of the stickers, so I didn't use
\startchapter and the likes.
I think there is workaround for your case: not placing heads in document.
Very good hint, thank you. It works perfectly fine with MkII. With MkIV,
although the head is not printed, some whitespace is added that disturbs
On 03/22/2014 07:11 PM, Jean-Philippe Rey wrote:
[...]
Very good hint, thank you. It works perfectly fine with MkII. With
MkIV, although the head is not printed, some whitespace is added that
disturbs the layout. I tried
\setuphead[chapter,section][placehead=hidden]
and got rid
Dear math typesetting aficianados,
In the following example,
\starttext
$x^3\ x\mathstrut^3$
\stoptext
the superscript without the strut is about 2pt lower than with the
strut, using MkIV. With MkII or plain TeX, they are the same height
(at the higher position obtained by using the \mathstrut
of Palatino.
Here's an example (using 2014.02.14 beta). The Sun subscript using
_{\tf Sun} or _{\rm Sun} was in Palatino in the corresponding MkII
setup, but is in Euler now. The workaround of an hbox with \tfxx or
\tfx doesn't get quite the right size.
\usetypescriptfile[euler]
\definetypeface
come out in Euler
instead of Palatino.
Here's an example (using 2014.02.14 beta). The Sun subscript using
_{\tf Sun} or _{\rm Sun} was in Palatino in the corresponding MkII
setup, but is in Euler now. The workaround of an hbox with \tfxx or
\tfx doesn't get quite the right size.
That is because
Aditya,
Here's an example (using 2014.02.14 beta). The Sun subscript using
_{\tf Sun} or _{\rm Sun} was in Palatino in the corresponding MkII
setup, but is in Euler now. The workaround of an hbox with \tfxx or
\tfx doesn't get quite the right size.
That is because in math mode, \rm
What is the MkIV/LuaTeX way to set the CropBox?
In MkII/PDFTeX, I used
\pdfpagesattr = {/CropBox [54 72 558 720]}
With MkIV, I've tried
\pdfcompresslevel 0
\pdfbackendsetpagesattribute{CropBox}{[54 72 558 720]}
\starttext
\input knuth
\stoptext
but that set the CropBox as a string
on ConTeXt]
to the Subject field of your message.
The issues which may be addressed are of the following categories:
1. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs mkii (due to
differences in engine)
2. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs LuaLaTeX + Opentype
math
.
Yes. This is one of the changes from MkII to MkIV. I think that Hans had a
This Way document on this.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg
efficiently the task, please add the following tag
[Math on ConTeXt]
to the Subject field of your message.
The issues which may be addressed are of the following categories:
1. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs mkii (due to
differences in engine)
2. Differences
:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Keith J. Schultz
schul...@uni-trier.dewrote:
Am 11.02.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii
/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt
and my collaborators
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
research using
:00 Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams
Am 11.02.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Keith J. Schultz schul...@uni-trier.dewrote:
Am 11.02.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii
Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research
using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my
collaborators dont know ConTeXt).
It certainly works OK
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It
worked just fine.
At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but
research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt
and my
Am 05.02.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org:
On 2/5/2014 11:03 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 05.02.2014 um 16:45 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org:
Hello,
Under mkii we used to have a running footer that appeared below the crop
marks. Under mkiv I can't get
Hello,
Under mkii we used to have a running footer that appeared below the crop
marks. Under mkiv I can't get that to work.
The MWE I'm trying (with ConTeXt mkiv from the TeXLive 2013 CD):
\def\TopText { Top Text }
\def\BottomText { Bottom Text }
\def\pagecutmarksymbol {\the\realpageno}
\def
Am 05.02.2014 um 16:45 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org:
Hello,
Under mkii we used to have a running footer that appeared below the crop
marks. Under mkiv I can't get that to work.
The MWE I'm trying (with ConTeXt mkiv from the TeXLive 2013 CD):
\def\TopText { Top Text
On 2/5/2014 11:03 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 05.02.2014 um 16:45 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org:
Hello,
Under mkii we used to have a running footer that appeared below the crop
marks. Under mkiv I can't get that to work.
The MWE I'm trying (with ConTeXt mkiv from the TeXLive
On 1/29/2014 9:41 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi,
With the latest beta,
ConTeXt ver: 2013.06.07 17:34 MKII fmt: 2014.1.29
in a file typeset with mkii I have a bunch of metapost macros (drawing a logo…)
which used to typeset correctly until last week, I get an error message saying
Hi,
With the latest beta,
ConTeXt ver: 2013.06.07 17:34 MKII fmt: 2014.1.29
in a file typeset with mkii I have a bunch of metapost macros (drawing a logo…)
which used to typeset correctly until last week, I get an error message saying:
Preloading the plain mem file
in other
commands (core functions as well as third party modules) to set a default value.
needs some thinking
\setupTABLE
[framecolor=\maintextcolor]
some settings date from mkii times but again we need to think of side
effects
Hans
of natural tables, this way can use this color also in
other
commands (core functions as well as third party modules) to set a default
value.
needs some thinking
\setupTABLE
[framecolor=\maintextcolor]
some settings date from mkii times but again we need to think of side effects
Hi Hans,
It seems that with the latest beta mkiv, version
ConTeXt ver: 2014.01.23 01:55 MKIV beta fmt: 2014.1.23
\widetilde and \widehat in mathmode are misplaced (and this is so in any of the
fonts I tried).
Please compare the result of the following in mkii (where everything
fmt: 2014.1.23
\widetilde and \widehat in mathmode are misplaced (and this is so in any of
the fonts I tried).
Please compare the result of the following in mkii (where everything is
correct) and in mkiv:
begin tilde-hat.tex
\starttext
We set ${\widetilde n}(t) := n(1 - t
of
the fonts I tried).
Please compare the result of the following in mkii (where everything is
correct) and in mkiv:
begin tilde-hat.tex
\starttext
We set ${\widetilde n}(t) := n(1 - t)$, and ${\widehat u}(\xi) :=
\int_{{\Bbb R}}\exp(-{\rm i}x\xi)f(x)dx$.
\stoptext
end
Hi Hans,
It seems that with the latest beta mkiv, version
ConTeXt ver: 2014.01.23 01:55 MKIV beta fmt: 2014.1.23
\widetilde and \widehat in mathmode are misplaced (and this is so in any of the
fonts I tried).
Please compare the result of the following in mkii (where everything
local tree with
% dummy file
\endinput
this file can be used for local overrides (just some mkii compatible
feature).
If this is the case, should not the the dummy-file be in the
distribution!
That way if somebody has local overrides they can modify it if needed
-loc.mkiv someplace in your local tree with
% dummy file
\endinput
this file can be used for local overrides (just some mkii compatible feature).
If this is the case, should not the the dummy-file be in the
distribution!
That way if somebody has local overrides they can modify
library 'loc'
you can add a file type-loc.mkiv someplace in your local tree with
% dummy file
\endinput
this file can be used for local overrides (just some mkii compatible feature).
If this is the case, should not the the dummy-file be in the
distribution!
That way
the following which was given to me by Hans a long time
ago: unfortunately for some reason this does not work anymore with ConTeXt
mkiv, but it is quite fine with mkii:
%%% begin question-hint-answer.tex
\defineblock[question]
\defineblock[hint]
\defineblock[answer]
\defineenumeration[question][location
Jaroslav,
I have something like the following which was given to me by Hans a long
time ago: unfortunately for some reason this does not work anymore with
ConTeXt mkiv, but it is quite fine with mkii:
(Untested): Change location=hanging to alternative=hanging.
%%% begin question-hint-answer.tex
Jaroslav Hajtmar
Hello Jaroslav,
I have something like the following which was given to me by Hans a long time
ago: unfortunately for some reason this does not work anymore with ConTeXt
mkiv, but it is quite fine with mkii:
Add \keepblocks[question
was given to me by Hans a long
time ago: unfortunately for some reason this does not work anymore with
ConTeXt mkiv, but it is quite fine with mkii:
Add \keepblocks[question].
Wolfgang
___
If your question
this file can be used for local overrides (just some mkii compatible
feature).
(/Users/hansm/tex/context-16/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-imp-texgyre.mkiv){/Users/hansm/tex/context-16/tex/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/lm/lm-math.map}{/Users/hansm/tex/context-16/tex/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/lm/lm-rm.map
to also enable mkii/texexec to load the patterns?
I did copy-paste the section from lang-def.mkiv to lang-ind.mkii and
also added an entry in lang-def.lua but the log does not show pattern
for ml loaded, in addition to mentioning language ml is undefined.
Okay, is the best way to install beta
], log says language 'en' is active).
\language is a local command, use \mainlanguage instead
Is there a way to also enable mkii/texexec to load the patterns?
I did copy-paste the section from lang-def.mkiv to lang-ind.mkii and
probably some more is needed, but in mkii you then also need tp use
]
കോണ്ടെക്സ്റ്റില് മലയാളം ടൈപ്പ്സെറ്റ് ചെയ്തത്
\stoptext
The font, Rachana, could be found here:
http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/smc/fonts/malayalam-fonts-6.0/Rachana/Rachana.ttf
Is there a way to also enable mkii/texexec to load the patterns?
I did copy-paste the section from lang-def.mkiv
is the name of the graphic
and the second argument let you change the values for TeXpage, in the old
MkII code the second parameter was also used as second argument for
\externalfigure. A problem in MkII was that you had something in the second
parameter which was used by \startTEXpage
and the second argument let you change the values for TeXpage, in the old
MkII code the second parameter was also used as second argument for
\externalfigure. A problem in MkII was that you had something in the second
parameter which was used by \startTEXpage *and* \externalfigure and the
output wasn’t what
On 12/1/2013 8:57 PM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
With the following minimal file on MkIV (2013.05.28 00:36 MKIV current),
the upstroke of the square root is vertical instead of having the usual
slant toward the right. With MkII it has the usual slant.
I see this problem only with certain
to control
\maybeyear.
In the bibl-xxx.tex files, it is defined as
\def\maybeyear#1{#1}
or
\def\maybeyear#1{}
as needed. Perhaps this is for mkii.
In bibl-bib.mkiv, one has
\appendtoks
\doifelse{\bibtexpublicationsparameter\c!maybeyear}\v!off
{\let\maybeyear\gobbleoneargument
are numbered consecutively
within chapters in a book. I used the same code for a document
written in mkii, and I thought I could just reuse it in mkiv.
Obviously, there is something I am missing. Question: How do I get
the same output when compiling the following code with 'context' as
when
to control
\maybeyear.
In the bibl-xxx.tex files, it is defined as
\def\maybeyear#1{#1}
or
\def\maybeyear#1{}
as needed. Perhaps this is for mkii.
In bibl-bib.mkiv, one has
\appendtoks
\doifelse{\bibtexpublicationsparameter\c!maybeyear}\v!off
{\let\maybeyear\gobbleoneargument
files, it is defined as
\def\maybeyear#1{#1}
or
\def\maybeyear#1{}
as needed. Perhaps this is for mkii.
In bibl-bib.mkiv, one has
\appendtoks
\doifelse{\bibtexpublicationsparameter\c!maybeyear}\v!off
{\let\maybeyear\gobbleoneargument}
{\let\maybeyear\firstofoneargument
to control
\maybeyear.
In the bibl-xxx.tex files, it is defined as
\def\maybeyear#1{#1}
or
\def\maybeyear#1{}
as needed. Perhaps this is for mkii.
In bibl-bib.mkiv, one has
\appendtoks
\doifelse{\bibtexpublicationsparameter\c!maybeyear}\v!off
{\let\maybeyear\gobbleoneargument
On 11/19/2013 7:52 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Andrea,
According to Wolfgang Schuster and some others removing the file
Skia.ttf may solve the problem.
Please read the thread
no, it's a ruby issue (mkii related)
switching to mkiv solves the problem
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context
On 19 Nov 2013, at 10:25, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 11/19/2013 7:52 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Andrea,
According to Wolfgang Schuster and some others removing the file
Skia.ttf may solve the problem.
Please read the thread
no, it's a ruby issue (mkii related)
Mavericks' ruby
: btw, should I consider to switch to MkIV? I mean, at the moment I’m not
interested into Lua capabilities, but is mkII intended as a leggy support?
--
Andrea Valle
--
CIRMA - StudiUm
Università degli
but is mkII intended as a leggy support?
legacy! :) damn corrector
--
Andrea Valle
--
CIRMA - StudiUm
Università degli Studi di Torino
-- http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/
-- http
On 11/19/2013 11:40 AM, Andrea Valle wrote:
PS: btw, should I consider to switch to MkIV? I mean, at the moment I’m
not interested into Lua capabilities, but is mkII intended as a leggy
support?
it will stay but unchanged ... eventually the minimals will default to
luatex only (leaner
. I used the same code for a document
written in mkii, and I thought I could just reuse it in mkiv.
Obviously, there is something I am missing. Question: How do I get
the same output when compiling the following code with 'context' as
when compiled with 'texexec'.
When compiled with 'context
)
On 19 Nov 2013, at 13:17, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 11/19/2013 11:40 AM, Andrea Valle wrote:
PS: btw, should I consider to switch to MkIV? I mean, at the moment I’m
not interested into Lua capabilities, but is mkII intended as a leggy
support?
it will stay but unchanged
Hi,
please have a look at the minimal example at the bottom. I am
typesetting theorems and lemmata which are numbered consecutively
within chapters in a book. I used the same code for a document
written in mkii, and I thought I could just reuse it in mkiv.
Obviously, there is something I am
Am 15.11.2013 um 17:02 schrieb Thomas Möbius kont...@thomasmoebius.de:
Hi,
please have a look at the minimal example at the bottom. I am
typesetting theorems and lemmata which are numbered consecutively
within chapters in a book. I used the same code for a document
written in mkii
Hi,
In MkII, it was possible to change the limits on integrals using
\setupmathematics[integral=...] % limits, nolimits, displaylimits
that would affect how \int, \iint, \iiint, \oint, etc behaved.
I can see two ways of definining a similar feature in MkIV.
1. Define \intop, \iintop, etc
On 11/18/2013 9:41 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
In MkII, it was possible to change the limits on integrals using
\setupmathematics[integral=...] % limits, nolimits, displaylimits
that would affect how \int, \iint, \iiint, \oint, etc behaved.
I can see two ways of definining a similar
. It was discussed on the list a couple times
already and at one point someone collected examples [1]. Also, I
sketched the current state of parallel texts elsewhere [2].
For certain values of pressing :-) Two pessimistic remarks about that: (1)
I experimented with a mechanism that Hans build for mkii
with a mechanism that Hans build for mkii a while ago, and I found it
difficult to decide how to define what was expected of parallel typesetting. In the end,
I wasn't convinced that an entirely automated version was possible at all. (2) I'm afraid
that's not part of the present project
typeset the lines
closer together, and judge for ourselves whether it looks too bad. (When
we used to typeset the same text at 8.1pt/9.3pt using mkii, blank lines
did not occur.) Is there something similar to \lineskiplimit that we can
tweak? I've been reading section 5.5 Line Spacing in the context
that makes sense, but we would like to be able typeset the lines
closer together, and judge for ourselves whether it looks too bad. (When
we used to typeset the same text at 8.1pt/9.3pt using mkii, blank lines
did not occur.) Is there something similar to \lineskiplimit that we can
tweak? I've been
, I
sketched the current state of parallel texts elsewhere [2].
For certain values of pressing :-) Two pessimistic remarks about that:
(1) I experimented with a mechanism that Hans build for mkii a while
ago, and I found it difficult to decide how to define what was expected
of parallel
weight, with an
extra character added, and it's a TTF. We had it working with mkii but
not yet with mkiv.
in that case yoiu can put the fonts somewhere and write a typescript ..
see type-imp-mscore.mkiv for exmaples ... that way you have complete
control over what gets loaded
Hans
, and it's a TTF. We had it working with mkii but
not yet with mkiv.
When you say out of the box, I think you're referring to the
gentium-tug package box, not the ConTeXt box... in other words, I should
not expect Gentium to work just because I installed ConTeXt; I have to
also install gentium-tug
: The contents of this page are OLD /.../
- nobody in the ConTeXt community bothers about MKII (pdfTeX) any longer
- texfont.pl has always been a bit problematic and is definitely not
really maintained any longer
- you can find Gentium at http://www.ctan.org/pkg/gentium-tug (also in
TeX Live
happy to take good advice, so I looked at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone to see why it would be
a better option.
The basic reason I can see is that Standalone is updated more frequently.
Three or four years ago, when ConTeXt was moving from MkII to MkIV,
you had to run through
, at 22:18, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Otared Kavian wrote:
Dear Hans,
I noticed a difference between mkii and mkiv in the behavior of \mframed: it
seems that in mkiv the frame is not vertically aligned with the the + sign
in the following example (or rather
Dear Hans,
I noticed a difference between mkii and mkiv in the behavior of \mframed: it
seems that in mkiv the frame is not vertically aligned with the the + sign in
the following example (or rather it is not vertically centered, please see the
attached PDF produced with ConTeXt ver
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Otared Kavian wrote:
Dear Hans,
I noticed a difference between mkii and mkiv in the behavior of \mframed: it
seems that in mkiv the frame is not vertically aligned with the the + sign in
the following example (or rather it is not vertically centered, please see
Thanks Aditya!
I overlooked this change in mkiv…
Best regards: OK
On 21 oct. 2013, at 22:18, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Otared Kavian wrote:
Dear Hans,
I noticed a difference between mkii and mkiv in the behavior of \mframed: it
seems that in mkiv
in a much more complex way with few more
thousands of glyphs to avoid using them so the font remains usable with
ConTeXt, and I still get crashes every now and then that I stopped
bothering with reporting them.
there's always xetex as alternative -)
Except I can’t use it :) even with MkII
and try to adapt to that.
there's always xetex as alternative -)
Except I can’t use it :) even with MkII as there is zero support for
XeTeX’s (rudimentary) RTL model.
(unless you're referring to wanting to use the microsoft word math
renderer trickery -)
I never set math actually :) unless
for help
here for such a simple thing, but I surrendered. My last attempt was
using the simplefonts module.
Here is what I get (linux-64 ubuntu):
* texexec --pdf novel.tex*
you mix up old an new (mkii an dmkiv)
run this:
context novel.tex
On 2013–10–10 Xan wrote:
Minimal example:
% Regime
\enableregime[utf]
Not required if you use MkIV
does not work.
It works here with 2013.10.09 10:36 using MkIV and MkII. At least I
don't get an error and a PDF with a few green blots is created.
What's the error message you get
On 2013–10–10 Xan wrote:
Minimal example:
% Regime
\enableregime[utf]
Not required if you use MkIV
does not work.
It works here with 2013.10.09 10:36 using MkIV and MkII. At least I
don't get an error and a PDF with a few green blots is created.
What's the error message you
get (linux-64 ubuntu):
* texexec --pdf novel.tex*
you mix up old an new (mkii an dmkiv)
run this:
context novel.tex
--**--**-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27
surrendered. My last attempt was using the
simplefonts module.
Here is what I get (linux-64 ubuntu):
* texexec --pdf novel.tex*
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013)
\write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./novel.tex
ConTeXt ver: 2013.06.07 17:34 MKII fmt: 2013.10.8 int
901 - 1000 of 5544 matches
Mail list logo
