I feel your pain info mail bag. It sometimes feels like the peripheral hassles
of licensing etc are outweighing the benefits of using Nuke.
The licensing model is so antiquated that it’s an impediment to using it if you
are a small shop or freelancer and it’s going to start hurting them more
As much as all these annoyances are valid, I do feel the need to play the
devils advocate here. Nuke wasn't designed for freelancers and shouldn't
be treated as such. It was made for use in a studio. So when you bring the
software on set or out of the house, you'll have to work around that
I think with the arrival of Nuke Studio, The Foundry is making a
big effort to enter the advertisement market, in which there are
quite a lot of freelancers.
The sharing/cloud option has been possible for years already with
both FLEXlm and RLM.
If you get a floating license and you can access
I think that the future of software piracy protection is going to be
precisely the Netflix model, which is to stream the software and run the
services off the cloud, with local storage and some processing, of course.
This is going to happen, whether we like it or not, and even Adobe has
started
think the minimum requirement is
15 CC licenses).
-Nathan
From: Jose Fernandez de Castro
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:11 AM
To: Nuke user discussion
Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] unimpressed and moving on
I think that the future of software piracy protection is going to be precisely
license server (I think the minimum
requirement is 15 CC licenses).
-Nathan
*From:* Jose Fernandez de Castro pixelcowbo...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:11 AM
*To:* Nuke user discussion nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
*Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] unimpressed and moving
18, 2014 10:11 AM
*To:* Nuke user discussion nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
*Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] unimpressed and moving on
I think that the future of software piracy protection is going to be
precisely the Netflix model, which is to stream the software and run the
services off
).
-Nathan
*From:* Jose Fernandez de Castro pixelcowbo...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:11 AM
*To:* Nuke user discussion nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
*Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] unimpressed and moving on
I think that the future of software piracy protection
: Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014 21:40
An: Nuke user discussion
Betreff: Re: [Nuke-users] unimpressed and moving on
Cloud licensing shouldn't really be an issue legally speaking. None of the
footage or assets would leave the LAN? If footage can be streamed for review
sessions I don't see the licenses
...@support.thefoundry.co.uk
[mailto:nuke-users-boun...@support.thefoundry.co.uk] Im Auftrag von Ron Ganbar
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014 21:49
An: Nuke user discussion
Betreff: Re: [Nuke-users] unimpressed and moving on
Hi Elias,
I don't think anybody was talking about streaming Nuke, or at least
*Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:11 AM
*To:* Nuke user discussion nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
*Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] unimpressed and moving on
I think that the future of software piracy protection is going to be
precisely the Netflix model, which is to stream the software
Cloud licensing shouldn't really be an issue legally speaking. None
of the footage or assets would leave the LAN? If footage can be
streamed for review sessions I don't see the licenses cloud not.
Randy basically addressed this, but none of this flies under the
restrictions we're talking
Mr. Mail Bag has a good point though. I've heard a lot of horror stories on
this subject by now. TF is really pushing it to the point of scaring away
legitimate customers.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Francois Lord li...@francoislord.com
wrote:
Thanks for the info, Info Mail Bag!
On
I heard a couple of stories as well.
I'm sure there are freelancers out there using Nuke is a less than paid for
manner. And that's not right.
But it would seem to me that on one side, a freelancer simply can't afford
to pay $9,000 for software, and on the other side, the more people use
Nuke, the
I was in a situation where i was producing tutorials for fxphd and had
talked to the foundry about doing some for Them as well. So tf supplied me
with a license for that. One weekend i was behind on getting a tut out and
the license server broke and i couldnt get a hold of support so i did the
bad
Well soon either Autodesk or Blackmagic will buy The foundry. Maybe Adobe.
Guess we will see if that rumor of Carlyle group wanting to sell is true or
not.
Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Peter Hartwig
Or the worst fears, that with the current buying spree, The Foundry will
turn into a faceless giant.
I love The Foundry, but mainly because it still holds on to that small
company mentality. Won't last as it continues to grow, fear.
Ron Ganbar
email: ron...@gmail.com
tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309
Seems I was wrong with the sarcasm, people having genuine issues.
I hope Nuke doesn't get lost in the corporate greed.
Sent from my iPad
On 17 Dec 2014, at 21:22, Ron Ganbar ron...@gmail.com wrote:
Or the worst fears, that with the current buying spree, The Foundry will turn
into a
Thanks for the info, Info Mail Bag!
On 15-Dec-14 22:46, Info Mail Bag wrote:
Hi
Over the past few weeks I have had a steadily escalating level of
email harassment from the license department of the foundry.
To be clear I personally have not used cracked versions of the software.
I have
I just followed Info Mail Bag on twitter - very interesting guy with much to
say…..
Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes
www.neilscholes.com
On 16 Dec 2014, at 16:34, Francois Lord li...@francoislord.com wrote:
Thanks for the info, Info Mail Bag!
On 15-Dec-14 22:46, Info Mail Bag wrote:
Hi
Hi
Over the past few weeks I have had a steadily escalating level of email
harassment from the license department of the foundry.
To be clear I personally have not used cracked versions of the software.
I have maintained contact though out, explaining this to them the best I can
but the
21 matches
Mail list logo
