Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agenda 9/18/2018 modeling meeting

Dear Modelers,   Andy and I would like to reformulate our session application based on the wiki. Here is the tentative agenda items for this week, Duration Agenda Item Requested by Notes / Links START RECORDING  5 New cochair welcome Hui Deng  & Andy Mayer  5  

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agenda 9/18/2018 modeling meeting

Dear Modelers, Andy and I would like to reformulate our session application based on the wiki. Here is the tentative agenda items for this week, Duration Agenda Item Requested by Notes / Links START RECORDING 5 New cochair welcome Hui Deng &

[onap-discuss] [modeling] 2018 Modeling Subcommittee Election Results #lfn

The TSC has confirmed Heng Hui and Andy Mayer as Co-Chairs of the Modeling Subcommittee Election Results: https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_a6a7a4d0fd54fabb TSC Confirmation:

[onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Papyrus Modeling Training Class - September 19th at 7am ET

All, A Papyrus model training class will be held at 7am Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 19th. https://zoom.us/j/4996638718 A detailed outline will be provided at the time of the training. Regards, Kevin Scaggs AT -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this

[onap-discuss] #modeling [modeling] Modeling Subcommittee Ballots have been distributed #lfn

Ballots have been distributed to qualified members on V118 of the membership list, as per the criteria set in Section 4.4.1.3 of the Community Document. A total of 34 people are authorized to vote. Sending mail to voter andreik Sending mail to voter tina.tsou Sending mail to voter am803u

Re: [onap-discuss] #modeling Example VNFs

I want to reinforce this request, and also ask that we get at least one example with a lifecycle operation fleshed out as expected. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12243): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12243 Mute

[onap-discuss] #modeling Example VNFs

I drafted a reply to Lingli's clarifying question regarding what Anatoly was asking about the VNF onboarding model but didn't get it out to everyone in time on Zoom. Michela had asked for status on mapping the VNF onboarding package to the internal model. A while ago, Lingli had provided an

[onap-discuss][modeling] Today's Resource IM Call Cancelled

, August 31, 2018 9:51 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; yangxu (H) Cc: kp...@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss][modeling] Next Week's Resource IM Call Time Xu, I will be out of the office on Monday due to the holiday in the US, but would be able to participate during the same

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling List of Voters for the Modeling Subcommittee

] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 11:24 AM To: yangxu (H) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling List of Voters for the Modeling Subcommittee Thank you Xu. Yanbin Shi should be is China Telecom's delegate. My oversight. I'm

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling List of Voters for the Modeling Subcommittee

t regards, Xu From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 8:04 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling List of Voters for the Modeling Subcommittee As per the TSC meeting,

Re: [onap-discuss][modeling] Next Week's Resource IM Call Time

@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Xu Yang Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 9:53 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Cc: kp...@linuxfoundation.org Subject: [onap-discuss][modeling] Next Week's Resource IM Call Time Hi All, I heard that next Monday is bank holiday

Re: [onap-discuss][modeling] Next Week's Resource IM Call Time

, China Mobile: +86 13810012241 Email: menglin...@chinamobile.com - 发件人: 代表 Xu Yang 答复: , 日期: 2018年8月31日 星期五 09:52 收件人: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 抄送: "kp...@linuxfoundation.org" 主题: [onap-discuss][modeling] Next Week's Resource IM

[onap-discuss][modeling] Next Week's Resource IM Call Time

Hi All, I heard that next Monday is bank holiday in America, and many participants are not available due to it. I would like to ask if you prefer to cancel next week’s call or move it to another day, for example, Wednesday the same time slot? Please share your opinions. Best regards, Xu

[onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling List of Voters for the Modeling Subcommittee

As per the TSC meeting, here is what I have set as the voting members eligible to receive a ballot this year, sorted by company. Voting members marked in red are not subscribed to onap-discuss under the email listed on the membership page. They may not receive this notification as a result.

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

g.maopeng1 mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn>>; zhan.jie1 mailto:zhan.j...@zte.com.cn>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model I have updated the Network Service Descriptor <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Network+Service+Descriptor+Model+-+Based+on+R2>

[onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections Call for Self-Nominations #lfn

The nomination period is now over. Your candidates are Andy Mayer and Deng Hui. 37 people responded to the poll regarding How would you like to see the Chair elections handled?  91.9% were in favor of Chair & Vice Chair (elected via the top vote getter and 1st runner up respectively) I

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

gt; jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com > *Cc:* 郭楚怡 ; denglingli < > denglin...@chinamobile.com>; zhang.maopeng1 ; > zhan.jie1 > > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model > > > > I have updated the Network Service Descriptor > &

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

...@oamtechnologies.com Cc: 郭楚怡 ; denglingli ; zhang.maopeng1 ; zhan.jie1 Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model I have updated the Network Service Descriptor <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Network+Service+Descriptor+Model+-+Based+on+R2> model on the wiki

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

; yangxu (H) Cc: 郭楚怡 ; denglingli ; zhang.maopeng1 ; zhan.jie1 Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model Hi Xu- Two comments: 1. I will mark association member ends and referenced classes as experimental and put them in the output. 2. You don't see things like

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

er discussion and refinement are needed. >> >> >> >> And as Chuyi pointed out, there’s something on the wiki that are not >> shown in the Papyrus model, update is needed to keep them aligned. >> >> >> >> Jessie: I didn't catch w

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

*To:* yangxu (H) > *Cc:* 郭楚怡 ; onap-discuss < > onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; denglingli ; > zhang.maopeng1 ; zhan.jie1 < > zhan.j...@zte.com.cn> > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model > > > > Hi Xu- > >

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

. 邮件原文发件人：jessie jewitt 收件人：onap-discuss ,"郭楚怡" 抄　送: "yangxu (H)" ,denglingli ,"zhang.maopeng1" ,"zhan.jie1" 发送时间：2018-08-23 01:31:53主题：Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor modelHi Chuyi- Yes, it39s my fault

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

;>; yangxu (H) mailto:yang...@huawei.com>>; denglingli mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>; zhang.maopeng1 mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn>>; zhan.jie1 mailto:zhan.j...@zte.com.cn>> Subject: Re:Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model Hello, Jess

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

rds, > > Xu > > > > *From:* 郭楚怡 [mailto:guoch...@chinamobile.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2018 1:38 PM > *To:* jessie.jewitt > *Cc:* onap-discuss ; yangxu (H) < > yang...@huawei.com>; denglingli ; > zhang.maopeng1 ; zhan.jie1 < > zhan.j...@

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

t is the point where should update. > > > > > BR, > > Chuyi. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----邮件原文 > *发件人：*Jessie Jewitt > *收件人：*"yangxu (H)" > *抄 送: *"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" > *发送时间：*2018-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

t; mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> 发送时间：2018-08-21 00:41:12 主题：Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model Hi Xu- The link you refer to in your email to Network Service (which I assume is Descriptor) is not a model that is acceptable to me. I certainly don't r

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

should update. BR, Chuyi. 邮件原文发件人：Jessie Jewitt 收件人："yangxu (H)" 抄　送: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 发送时间：2018-08-21 00:41:12主题：Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor modelHi Xu- The link you refer to in your email to Netw

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections Call for Self-Nominations

: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections Call for Self-Nominations As per Subcommittee Chair Elections<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Annual+Community+Elections#AnnualCommunityElections-SubcommitteeChairElections> I am officially opening the self-nomination

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections Call for Self-Nominations

, August 20, 2018 4:41 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections Call for Self-Nominations As per Subcommittee Chair Elections<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Annual-2BCommun

[onap-discuss] [modeling] #modeling Modeling Subcommittee Elections Call for Self-Nominations

As per Subcommittee Chair Elections I am officially opening the self-nomination period for the Modeling Subcommittee Chair elections. The nomination period will end on Friday, Aug 24 @ 2:00 Pm Pacific The members eligible to be a voting member is set to V118 of the Modeling Subcommittee

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

DC > team. > > > > Please share your opinions on this issue and let’s try to finalize the > clean model before the deadline, thanks. > > > > Best regards, > > Xu > > > > *From:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] *On >

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

opinions on this issue and let’s try to finalize the clean model before the deadline, thanks. Best regards, Xu From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Jessie Jewitt Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 3:09 AM To: onap-discuss Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [0815 Service IM Minutes]

it could be acceptable in SDC for such new node type. Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: LinMeng [mailto:menglin...@chinamobile.com] Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [0815 Service IM Minutes] Hi all, This is the minutes of Service IM Call on Wednesday. Please check and make sure that we have

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] [0815 Service IM Minutes]

- 发件人: 代表 LinMeng 答复: , 日期: 2018年8月15日 星期三 14:44 收件人: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" , Yan Yang , "yangxu (H)" , maopeng , "Katzman, Anatoly" 抄送: 邓灵莉 , "denghui (L)" 主题: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] [Service IM Agenda]

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] [Service IM Agenda]

Hi all, For today’s service IM call, we will continue the remaining agenda of yesterday’s modeling subcommittee call,  will mainly focus on NSD/SD Discussion: 1.  VFC requirements for NSD (Yan Yang) 2. Resource/Service IM decision on NSD (Xu Yang) 3. NSD Proposal (Maopeng Zhang) 4. Service

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] DM IG 2018-08-13 call is cancelled #modeling

Hi Anatoly Last week, during Service IM call, there were suggestion that this needs to be further discussed, 1) Current NSD IM belongs to resource IM other than service IM according to the consensus of Service/Resource IM discussion. 2) VFC needs NS information for their use case.

[onap-discuss] [modeling] DM IG 2018-08-13 call is cancelled #modeling

Dear all, the today meeting of the Data Modeling Interest Group is cancelled. The plans for this call were to finalize the model of an ONAP service so that it would support the following cases: - ONAP

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

Please review and provide comments by 8/13 (on the wiki) for the proposed Network Service Descriptor model. It was aligned with ETSI IFA014 v2.4.4. Thanks, Jessie -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for nominations: modeling subcommitee Chair and Vice Chair

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of C. Wechsler Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 11:51 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for nominations: modeling subcommitee Chair and Vice Chair [Sorry for starting new topic

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] [Service IM Call Canceled] Service IM Call is canceled this week

Hi all, Just to let you know, the service IM call is canceled this week. Thanks. BR, Lin --- 孟琳 人工智能和智慧运营研发中心 中国移动通信有限公司研究院 中国北京市西城区宣武门西大街32号（100053） Meng Lin Center of AI and Intelligent Operation R China Mobile Research Institute No.32 Xuanwumen

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for nominations: modeling subcommitee Chair and Vice Chair

[Sorry for starting new topic ( https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/topic/confluence_chesla_wechsler/23904618?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,0,23904618 ) with Confluence access request  - should have replied here] Hi, Kenny, Deng, I'm having the same access problem  getting to

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - Result

Best Regards, -kenny From: WECHSLER, CHESLA C Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:16 AM To: 'denghui (L)' ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - Result Thanks very much, Deng. I don't seem to have access to that TSC Charter for some

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Creation of R3 IM Clean

Xu- As discussed in the meeting this morning, I propose that R3 IM Clean be generated from Papyrus. The following activities would have to be done in order to do this, if not already done: Kevin: Update VNF model - Add VnfInstance/VnfcInstance - Align VNF model with IFA011 V2.5.1

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - Result

) Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 5:32 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; WECHSLER, CHESLA C Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - Result Thank you Chesla. TSC recommend that the election of the committee should happen after TSC election, that is after Aug

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - Result

iscuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of C. Wechsler Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 5:51 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - Result Congratulations, Deng. I'd like to get a good understanding

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - Result

Congratulations, Deng. I'd like to get a good understanding of how the Model Subcommittee Chair gets elected and when.  I believe you had mentioned August at one point, but is there a particular date?  Is there a timeframe for self nominations?  Is there a clear understanding of who can

[onap-discuss] [modeling] PTL Election for modeling project - Result

Dear ONAP TSC, Based on the process of annual community elections for PTL described on https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Annual+Community+Elections, here’s the voting result for modeling project: 1. DENG Hui (Condorcet方法优胜者: 胜出所有其他投票选项) 2. Abstain 负于 DENG Hui，差距为 8�C0 I have updated the

Declined: [onap-discuss] [modeling] SDC review high level requirement on Wednesday

END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=DECLINED;CN="Germain, Daniel":MAILTO:daniel.germ...@cgi.com COMMENT;LANGUAGE=en-US:\n\n SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-US:Declined: [onap-discuss] [modeling] SDC review high level requirement on Wednesday DTSTART;TZID=China Standard Time:20180718T21

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource IM Call Meeting Room Information

Hi All, It seems my request for changing the meeting time is too late for the helpdesk to do the change. So I booked another room for today’s meeting, hopefully you can join. Zoom: https://welink-meeting.zoom.us/j/2167367338 Time: 9 pm Beijing Time, 9 am US Eastern Best regards, Xu Yang Huawei

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Cancel Today's Resource IM Call

Hi All, My apologize, I meet some problem to host the meeting... I would like to cancel today's meeting, let's continue discussion next Monday. And for your information, there's a call discussing the high level requirements with SDC, you can join that call. Zoom id: 137904496. Sorry for the

[onap-discuss][modeling] Resource Information Model Call Postponed to Wednesday

Hi all, Because many usual participants need to attend the PTL call today (which is at the same time slot as the resource IM call), the call for resource IM interest group is postponed to Wednesday. The time is the same as our usual call. The current agenda includes discussion on the run time

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Information Model in Papyrus

Awesome! Thank you all. From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Jessie Jewitt Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 2:00 PM To: onap-discuss Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Information Model in Papyrus We finally have a "draft" ONAP model in a working branch in Gerrit. I

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Information Model in Papyrus

We finally have a "draft" ONAP model in a working branch in Gerrit. It contains modeling work that is in progress, and does not represent anything committed yet to R3. When the model is approved, it will move to a master branch. If you would like to use Papyrus for viewing this model, you can

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling

DENG Hui From: Christopher Donley (Chris) Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 10:28 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com; denghui (L) Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling Hui, I don't think that repo has a validation job

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling

From: denghui (L) To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com; Cc: Christopher Donley (Chris); Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling Time: 2018-07-12 18:15:26 Hi Jessie, Thanks a lot for your help. Maybe this is your 1st time to submit

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling

: Friday, July 13, 2018 5:03 AM To: onap-discuss ; denghui (L) Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus working branch for modeling Deng Hui- I uploaded all the Papyrus files to the working branch. There is an outstanding issue open in Gerrit for you to approve to commit these files

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Modeling Project Casablanca M1 Scope

Hi Brian Hope previous email could answer your questions, thanks a lot for your kind review Best regards, DENG Hui From: Brian Hedstrom [mailto:brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Friday, July 6, 2018 5:57 AM To: onap-discuss Cc: denghui (L) ; Gildas Lanilis Subject: [modeling]

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Modeling Project Casablanca M1 Scope

Modeling Subcommittee: I was reviewing the Casablanca Release Deck which Gildas presented today on the TSC call and the TSC approved. In looking at the

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

Hello Jessie Answer inline == > From: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 3:46 AM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements Hello DENG

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

Hello DENG Hui, I think it has been beneficial to collect and review the modeling requirements for R3. Thank you for doing this. I have a few questions for you, if you would be so kind as to answer: 1. The requirements were supposed to be completed, according to the Casablanca Release

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Data Modeling Interest Group agenda for July 2nd

Hi all, Today we will be holding an extended (2 hours instead of the usual 1h) call, 10am to 12pm eastern. As you all know, we have 2 quite different approaches to choose from: 1. SOL001 model for all, and 2. SOL001 model for onboarding, ONAP model downstream. The parties will present their

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Data Model Interest Group agenda for 06/25/2018 call

Hi all, The Data Model Interest Group is back to business, and here is the agenda for the today meeting: ## Presenter Subject Time 1 Thinh

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

Hello Kevin and all I have created a high level requirements wiki page based on the input of Beijing event: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements Please help to contribute to the spreadsheet as soon as possible, I also moved Kevin's draft proposal under this

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling

Sure, we will try DENG Hui From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 12:20 PM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject: Re: Modeling Thanks you. Also please share with the TSC what requirements your subcommittee

[onap-discuss][modeling] Initial proposal of ONAP R3 Data Model

Hi all, FYI, the initial proposal of the ONAP Data Model has just been published at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+DM+Base+Proposal It includes the Reference part (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+DM+Reference ) as well as a special section for examples

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling

Thanks you. Also please share with the TSC what requirements your subcommittee generated so the TSC can assess the different views. Mazin On Jun 20, 2018, at 12:08 PM, denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Mazin We will try to summarize the major disagreements and bring it to

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling

Hi Mazin We will try to summarize the major disagreements and bring it to TSC in next 2 weeks. Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) [mailto:ma...@research.att.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 11:33 AM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject:

[onap-discuss] Modeling

Deng Hui, Thanks for your presentation today, and I really appreciate the modeling committee working together. Lots has been accomplished since R1. I just wanted to articulate the conversation main points. 1. Modeling approaches for ONAP releases should be approved by the TSC. This should be

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Canceled - DM Interest Group Call @ Monday June 18

Hi All, The today meeting of the Data Modeling Interest Group (https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=34373995) is canceled. Regards, Anatoly Katzman ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

er interested people)could accept it. > Anyway, I encourage the proposer to discuss with Jessie to address her > comments. Or we need to discuss it the next week. > > Best regards, > Xu Yang > *发件人：*jessie jewitt > *收件人：*yangxu (H), > *抄 送：*denghui (L),onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

discuss with Jessie to address her comments. Or we need to discuss it the next week. Best regards, Xu Yang 发件人：jessie jewitt 收件人：yangxu (H), 抄 送：denghui (L),onap-discuss@lists.onap.org,onap-tsc, 时间：2018-06-16 02:03:57 主 题：Re: [onap-discuss][modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

pe of the model is still under discussion. The interest > group just agrees that the IISOMI definition of “obsolete” fits the current > intention of the proposal and decides to use the term. > > > > BR, > > Xu > > > > *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

12:05 AM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM Hello Deng Hui- Could you please clarify something for me. The ETSI "applied stere

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

Hello Deng Hui- Could you please clarify something for me. The ETSI "applied stereotype", on which this column in the wiki table is based, has "obsolete" as an artifact lifecycle option, with its definition supplied in the IISOMI Modeling Guidelines. This is the definition of "obsolete" in

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

Hello all, This is 1 week’s call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM. The intention is to mark several attributes/datatypes of the current model as “obsoleted” as their functionalities are covered by some other attributes. Detailed information

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session - Reminder and Bridge

Hello- This is a reminder that the Papyrus training session will take place today at 9am Eastern time. Bridge info: https://zoom.us/j/746737796 Thank you, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

Sorry for the continued confusion about the bridge. We will be using Kevin's bridge: https://zoom.us/j/746737796 Thank you, Jessie On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 6:13 PM, jessie jewitt < jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com> wrote: > The VNFSDK Modeling team is hosting a Papyrus training session on >

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

There has been an update to the bridge, and I've asked Kenny to please issue the invitation again. The bridge we will use will be: https://zoom.us/j/103916386 Please mark your calendars accordingly. Jessie p.s. Sorry for the confusion On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:52 AM, SCAGGS, KEVIN wrote: >

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Data Modeling Interest Group 2018-06-11 agenda

Good morning/evening everyone, The Data Modeling Interest Group is meeting today again on the bridge https://zoom.us/j/880773832, and here is the agenda for the today call: 1. 10 min. - Arun Gupta will open the call with a brief update on the Multicloud Data Model 2. 15 min - Anatoly Katzman:

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

A meeting announcement was sent out that this meeting was today. It is NEXT Wednesday June 13th at 6AM. Sorry for the inconvenience. -Jessie On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:52 AM, SCAGGS, KEVIN wrote: > All, > > > > We will use the following zoom meeting instead. > > > > https://zoom.us/j/987452560 >

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

All, We will use the following zoom meeting instead. https://zoom.us/j/987452560 Regards, Kevin From: jessie jewitt Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 8:14 PM To: onap-discuss Cc: MAYER, ANDREW J ; SCAGGS, KEVIN ; Brian Hedstrom Subject: [modeling] Papyrus Training Session The VNFSDK Modeling

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

;, "ZoneGroup", "NFVI-node" to support Casablanca use cases; and realizing these in the various public clouds and owner-operated clouds of interest. -Arun From: HU, BIN Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 10:30 AM To: Zhipeng Huang ; denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc ; GU

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of jessie jewitt Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 09:14 To: onap-discuss Cc: SCAGGS, KEVIN Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session The VNFSDK Modeling team is hosting a Papyrus training session on Wednesday, June 13th at 6am Pacific / 9am

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

The VNFSDK Modeling team is hosting a Papyrus training session on Wednesday, June 13th at 6am Pacific / 9am Eastern / 9pm China time This session will cover: 1. How to install Papyrus 2. The value of using a modeling tool such as Papyrus within ONAP 3. How to use Papyrus alongside the wiki. We

[onap-discuss] [modeling] R3 Data Model weekly meeting

Hi all, I am glad to announce that today at 10am est we are going to hold the first meeting of the R3 Data Model weekly forum. The forum is a spin-off from the ONAP Modeling Subcommittee weekly meeting, and it will provide a detailed coverage for the ONAP Data Model, mostly about: - evaluation

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Need a Quick Summary of MEF & ONS Activity

Both ONF and MEF has been involved in ONAP service modeling discussion, no conclusion has been made yet. From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 10:54 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.or

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Need a Quick Summary of MEF & ONS Activity

: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Need a Quick Summary of MEF & ONS Activity Sorry about reaching out to the entire list, but I have a time critical bit of info I need for a Board presentation. I need a quick one-sentence summary of current participation for both ONA and MEF. Looking for a high-l

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Need a Quick Summary of MEF & ONS Activity

Sorry about reaching out to the entire list, but I have a time critical bit of info I need for a Board presentation. I need a quick one-sentence summary of current participation for both ONA and MEF.  Looking for a high-level summary, not low level details. Thanks! Best Regards, -kenny

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Zhipeng Huang Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 1:10 AM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc ; GUPTA, ARUN Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure] Hi Arun and all, Sorry for the late response, I just want

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

age, we will limit one point > discussion time during our next call. > > > > Thanks a lot > > > > DENG Hui > > > > *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *GUPTA, ARUN > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 22, 201

[onap-discuss] [modeling]cancelation of service IM call this week

Hi all, Since people are focusing on R2 integration testing and with no new input to the discussion, this week'service IM call is cancelled. Thanks, Lingli ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

[onap-discuss] [modeling] R3 Data Model discussion - date and time set

Hi all, The voting poll (https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33064908) for the R3 Data Model discussion time is now officially closed. The time slot chosen by the vast majority is: Monday, 7:00am PST; 9:00am CST; 10:00am EST; 14:00 UTC; 17:00 Israel; 20:30 India; 22:00 Beijing

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Usage of Stereotypes in Modeling and Deprecating Attributes

1) Usage of Stereotypes in Modeling I took an action item from this morning's resource modeling call to write up how stereotypes are used in modeling. The information can be found here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Stereotypes Please take a few moments to familiarize yourself with this

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of GUPTA, ARUN Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 11:20 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure] The Wiki pages for Cloud Infrastructure Modeling in general: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33065694

[onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

The Wiki pages for Cloud Infrastructure Modeling in general: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33065694 and for Cloud Aggregation Classes: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Cloud+Infrastructure+Aggregate+Representation+Classes The presentation used in today's (Tuesday May 22)

[onap-discuss] [modeling][cloud infrastructure]

The Wiki pages for Cloud Infrastructure Modeling in general: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33065694 and for Cloud Aggregation Classes: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Cloud+Infrastructure+Aggregate+Representation+Classes The presentation used in today's (Tuesday May 22)

[onap-discuss] [modeling][sdc]New periodic Data Modeling meeting - links fixed

Hi all, We are spinning off a new weekly modeling call with a special focus on the Data Model discussions: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/%5BModeling%5D+Resource+Data+Model+Discussion Please let us know your preference on the call day and time:

[onap-discuss] [modeling][sdc]New periodic Data Modeling meeting

Hi all, We are spinning off a new weekly modeling call with a special focus on the Data Model discussions:

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Help on ONAP R2 Data Modeling verification

Thanks Deng That is surprising. Can each company with strong interest in this offer one coder please. This is a key activity and can’t be coded by 2 coders. This will impact our Casablanca release. Thank you all!! Mazin Sent through AT's fastest network On May 2, 2018, at 6:08 AM, denghui

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Help on ONAP R2 Data Modeling verification

Hi Denghui and Victor, Serban Jora (j...@research.att.com) and I can help with some of these verification tasks. Can you please reach out to us separately and provide a bit more detail? The jira tickets explanations are minimal. Thanks, Rittwik From:

  1   2   3   4   >