On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Re adding ooo-dev@ since this is STILL an AOO issue.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56 AM
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
After this, please drop general@
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
A signature does 2 things:
1. Ensures that no bits have been changed
2. That the bits come from a known (and trusted
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Bullshit. The policy is as old as the org itself and applies equally
The problem is that when someone questions what the policy is, as
several IPMC members have already, the response goes no further than
yelling that
audiences with totally different fields of applicability.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:10 PM
By default blog questions are held for moderation. I just checked and
we had quite a few comments. I let the non-spam ones through:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing_apache_openoffice_3_41#comments
I responded to one, but since there are a few of them I could use some
help
Changing the subject to something more accurate due to thread drift.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Identity != Trust.
Identity + Reputation == Trust.
The signature only guarantees
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:43 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 13:22 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
By default blog questions are held for moderation. I just checked and
we had quite a few comments. I let the non-spam ones through:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
People trust the Apache brand.
They download Apache stuff from somewhere.
That stuff is signed by an entity that is associated
with the Apache brand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
CVE-2012-2665 Manifest-processing errors in Apache OpenOffice 3.4.0
Reference: http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-2665.html
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache OpenOffice 3.4.0,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Moving back to AOO lists
These argument is a waste of everyones time. It seems to me that what is/is
not permissible is clear, indeed has been clear for some time.the summary
is... Patches welcome.
Clear to
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:31 AM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding to the (lack of) redirection problem between the old and the
new URL expressed on other threads, there are other problems reported
by users. The first one is that forum notifications still arrive with
only the old URL.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:03 AM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/8/26 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:31 AM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding to the (lack of) redirection problem between the old and the
new URL expressed on other threads, there are other
n Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
- Original Message -
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
Hi,
We need to do more work to have proper compliance with Apache
Infrastructure policy in managing external
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 26, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi,
We need to do more work to have proper compliance with Apache
Infrastructure policy
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if the ´new management´ at AOO ;) has any plans with regards to
´long term support´ for AOO?.
We've discussed this topic previously. You'll read more if you search
the list archives for LTS.
IMHO the
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
BTW,
- Original Message -
...
This is already part of the current process. The signatures are in
download_external_dependencies.pl. The Central Maven Repository uses these as
well.
Those are MD5 hashes, not
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/08/2012 Sylvain DENIS wrote:
I translated the text AOO 3.4.1 French. I would put online after the
official version.
Thanks, I've committed this to the French site using the naming conventions
currently used
the translation and than I'll send it to you.
Excellent!
-Rob
Jürgen
Am 25.08.2012 20:31, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Jürgen Lange j...@juergen-lange.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can't find a german announcement. On http://www.openoffice.org/de/ I
see a
link
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/25/2012 01:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 23/08/2012 22:06, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Also IMHO no need to separate between the languages.
Furthermore, when you have to check for a potential error, then you you
just
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
Has anyone inspected the MIME Type returned? If it is not a proper
one for OXT then it is possible that IE8 is doing detection of the
type.
I had different results than Dave's, and I concluded I
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
Rob
Might we have a count of AOO 3.4.1 downloads in first 24 hours? No need for
fancy graphics - a list would be OK.
First, you need to know that the SF numbers are daily numbers, and
based on a UTC day. Since we
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:23 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 August 2012 11:51, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:31:05 +0100
sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 August 2012 09:20, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:01:42 -0400
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
In due course, when we've all had a little rest after the release of AOO
3.4.1, it will be necessary to do some triage work on the Brainstorming, so
that the most requested changes make their way onto the planning table
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:29:57 -0400
Maurice Howe maur...@stny.rr.com wrote:
I use AVG 2012.0.2180 Free Edition
I installed AOO 3.4.1 on one of my Windows machines today and AVG didn't
complain. I'll check in detail
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 24, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 24, 2012, at 7:48 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:17:57 +0100
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug
2012/8/24 Michal Hriň michalh...@aol.com:
This patch (translation) wants to be applied to main (en-US) page.
Will be reverted.
Right. It should be placed in the specific NL directory. Either
zh-tw or zh-cn (I'm not sure which it is).
-Rob
Michal Hriň
Dňa Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:00:27 +0200
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Keith N. McKenna
keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote:
Hello All;
I have a proposed draft of a template for use in creating Release Notes
at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release+Notes+Template.
I like it. It did not apply in 3.4.1
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:44:34 -0400
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:29:57 -0400
Maurice Howe maur...@stny.rr.com wrote
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:45:18 -0400
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
Rob
Might we have a count of AOO 3.4.1 downloads in first 24 hours
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:18:22PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I was too fast and should have read the thread completely.
I can't remember the reason why I left out the en-US lang packs, we
should check if they
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
as the so called release manager I would like to give an update where we
are with the release and the final release preparation.
You all know we passed the PPMC and IPMC vote successful, the first
important
The Apache OpenOffice project is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1, the latest release of the
free and open community-developed productivity suite. This
maintenance release builds upon the success of Apache OpenOffice
3.4.0, which has been downloaded over
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
as the so called release manager I would like to give an update where we
are with the release and the final release preparation.
You all know
Now that the community graduation ballot has passed, one of our next
tasks is to identify a PMC Chair.
You can read about the duties of a PMC Chair here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair
How do we want to do this?
A strawman proposal:
1) Nominations would be open for 72 hours. Anyone
to that, what the
specific responsibilities of the Chair are and what the special standing of
the Chair is so its accountability can be carried out.
Indeed. That is why my 2nd sentence was to point to a link that
describes exactly this.
-Rob
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir
Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 10:36
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Proposed PMC Chair nomination process
Now that the community graduation ballot has passed, one of our next
tasks is to identify a PMC Chair.
You can
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I'm not comfortable having a PMC Chair election and nomination on ooo-dev.
It appears the IPMC was able to do this for their own Chair.
I also agree
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 23, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I suggest that the initial Project Management Committee (PMC) needs to be
identified
votes.
-Rob
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:30
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed PMC Chair nomination process
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:08 PM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
On 2012/08/22 11:24, Albino B Neto said:
Hi
2012/8/21 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 AM, eric wu jinjin...@cs2c.com.cn wrote:
ok,thank you for your suggestion,now i will prepare for my
, what the duties of PMC members are and, with respect to that, what
the specific responsibilities of the Chair are and what the special
standing of the Chair is so its accountability can be carried out.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:37 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/8/23 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com:
Way back in late April, Juergen proposed a new directory structure for
release packs than what we have now which is essentially:
/stable/VERSION/en-US items
/localized/lang
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
RGB ES wrote:
2012/8/23 Rory O'Farrellofarr...@iol.ie:
Announced on the en-Forum and by PM to the Volunteers.
Announced on ES forums. IT forums are not working...
As discussed in other threads, the IT forum now
Stefan Taxhet : st PPMC
Malte Timmermann : malte PPMC
Zhe Wang : wangzcdl PPMC
Rob Weir : robweir PPMC
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann : orw PPMC
Jian Fang Zhang : zhangjf PPMC
Xia Zhao : lilyzhao PPMC
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:54 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 August 2012 07:05, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 21 August 2012 22:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Why? Could very well have a publish all changes mode (the current
only option) alongside the cherry
1,852 votes until now
Juergen
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 x-apple-data-detectors://82, Rob Weir
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Shenfeng Liu
liush...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Back to the topic... :) The page looks great! I submitted 1 UI proposal
and
voted
Schmidt wrote:
On 8/21/12 7:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jürgen Schmidt
jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/21/12 5:45 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
FYI
we have passed the vote on general@incubator. We can now proceed
with
the release preparation ...
I am waiting
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/21/2012 11:16 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 08/21
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Michal Hriň michalh...@aol.com wrote:
Dňa Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:40:05 +0200 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org napísal:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/22/2012 10:18 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb
So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have
already announced 3.4.1 and are pushing users to www.openoffice.org.
Of course, they are not finding AOO 3.4.1 there yet.
For example this article is being spread via Twitter:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 17:29 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have
already announced 3.4.1 and are pushing users to www.openoffice.org.
Of course, they are not finding AOO 3.4.1
Am 23.08.2012 00:09, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 17:29 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have
already announced 3.4.1 and are pushing users
tests. All is working fine so far.
Jürgen
Am 23.08.2012 00:09, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, drewd...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 17:29 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have
already announced 3.4.1
The community vote has passed.
Vote reference: http://s.apache.org/5GA
+1
RGB-ES
Rory O'Farrell
Carl Marcum
Reizinger Zoltan
Keith N. McKenna
Kay Schenk
Roberto Galoppini
Imacat
Andrea Pescetti
Regina Henschel
Graham Lauder
Jürgen Lange
T.J. Frazier
Rob Weir
Dave Fisher
Peter Junge
Christian
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/23/2012 01:26 AM, schrieb drew:
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 01:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/23/2012 12:54 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM, drewd...@baseanswers.com wrote:
One more
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/23/2012 12:41 AM, schrieb drew:
OK one bad link on the other downloads page, so far
The Mac en_US language pack points to:
http
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
We are really getting ahead of ourselves.
We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed -
Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the
official SOURCE
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:36:56PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
We'll nede Juergen to upload that and SF to copy it. With the time
zone difference (Hamburg versus California) this will not happen
quickly
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 AM, eric wu jinjin...@cs2c.com.cn wrote:
ok,thank you for your suggestion,now i will prepare for my translations!
And the announcement blog post draft is here:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=announcing_apache_openoffice_3_41
Regards,
-Rob
As we perform the final preparations to release Apache OpenOffice
3.4.1 it is a good time to look ahead to the future. A big
opportunity is OpenOffice 4.0. That once seemed so very far away, but
2013 is getting closer every day. Will it be a large collection of
small ideas? Will it have a
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/21/12 5:45 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
FYI
we have passed the vote on general@incubator. We can now proceed with
the release preparation ...
I am waiting on the ok of infrastructure to start the upload, will
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
I agree that we should have some mention of other versions or
distributions that are based on AOO code, even if they are not
strictly ports. The question is where to mention them?
So far only
Forwarded with permission of the author. I corrected the English
version. Translators should take note.
-Rob
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Naber na...@danielnaber.de
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:07 PM
Subject: Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 announcement
To: robw...@apache.org
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
I agree that we should have some mention of other
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/21/12 9:19 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 8/21/12 7:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/21/12 5:45 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
FYI
we have
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Phillip Rhodes
motley.crue@gmail.com wrote:
Per Rob's email about the Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache
OpenOffice 4.0 I was perusing the Google Moderator doc[1] and came
across this suggestion:
Provide social capabilities within core editors to share
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote:
Back to the topic... :) The page looks great! I submitted 1 UI proposal and
voted for some others...
So far: 117 people have submitted 103 ideas and cast 902 votes
-Rob
- Simon
2012/8/22 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Wilson Goh w...@allot.com wrote:
Hello webmaster, there is a broken link,
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download
Aside from the error, why is the error page
I placed an outage notice on the download page, to let visitors know
they don't need to report the issue.
-Rob
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Wilson Goh w...@allot.com wrote:
Hello webmaster, there is a broken link,
http
Hi Dave,
Roberto's probably long asleep at this hour, so I hope you can pass
this on to someone at SourceForge who might be still up in California.
We're seeing widespread download errors when downloading OpenOffice.
There was probably some prep work going on to get ready for the 3.4.1
release
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:32 AM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
And what do you think, Rob?
You started this topic. Your comment? Is this what you want? ^_*'
I think it is really cool. I volunteered to do a blog post on this,
and I will. But I don't want it to be lost
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=announcing_apache_openoffice_3_4
Comments are welcome.
Some updates I know we'll need are:
1) The 11 million downloads claim will go to 12 or 13 depending on
when we
I put a draft of the graduation resolution onto the wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Graduation+Resolution+%28draft%29
As you can see, there is absolutely nothing interesting here yet.
I started with the Velocity graduation resolution and replace
Velocity with
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
We were supposed to wait to publish.
Author: pescetti
Date: Sun Aug 19 15:08:26 2012
New Revision: 829379
What did I publish? If it was only (like the diff showed)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
We are really getting ahead of ourselves.
Not really. It is not like issues like this are going to be found by
sitting here and not pushing the code our further. Every new class of
testers will find a new
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Kay Schenk wrote:
So, I think the second column on the porting page should be removed
entirely. I feel winPenPack is a distribution and not a port, and
therefore this would go as well. (I need to look again to see
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi;
- Original Message -
...
Ditto. This is our code, the source is there, with Apache headers.
The pre-built JAR at worst is redundant. I don't see a policy issue
here.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
OpenOffice is not only used as desktop application but also as hidden
part of other software and often as a conversion engine in the backend.
OpenOffice has very good filters for many file formats and the usage
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
- Original Message -
...
Hi Folks,
We are really getting ahead of ourselves.
I think so too :(.
We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed -
Marvin
asked for confirmation that
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
- Original Message -
Marvin's intervention is very far reaching indeed. It pretty much
supports the position
that there is no such thing as a binary release, and it involves some
issues that have
to be
A quick reminder, also of benefit to new members of the project, and
all those observers/lurkers on the list.
A release for a podling at Apache has a two-stage voting process:
1) The release is first approved by the Podling Project Management
Committee, in a 72-hour vote. This completed
Let's be careful. Don't we already have some announcement changes on
staging? If so we can bring this change as well onto staging, but we
should avoid publishing, since that is all-or-nothing, and we don't
want to put the announcement changes out yet.
-Rob
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:28 AM,
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 17/08/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
We've had several prods from our mentors suggesting that we are ready
to graduate.
I agree it would be good to do so, since it will automatically reduce
complex and unclear terminology
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our
willingness/readiness to govern ourselves. If this vote passes then
we continue by drafting a charter, submitting it for IPMC endorsement,
and then to the ASF Board for
Please vote in the main [VOTE] thread, and have discussion in this thread.
Thanks!
-Rob
consuming role, but it can become so on occasion.
This query should not prevent the community expressing their opinion in the
vote. I just wanted to let you know why I will be abstaining. You only need
my vote when it comes to the actual graduation vote.
Ross
On Aug 19, 2012 4:53 PM, Rob Weir robw
initially?
So is there anything on that list that you think needs Mentor
attention? Anything else in the status file?
-Rob
Thanks Regards,
Dave
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html
Ross
On Aug 19, 2012 4:53 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote
So it looks like we're ending up with two related pages, both now in staging:
This page describes the porting work in the project, including
work-in-progress as well as work that has already lead to a release:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/porting/index.html
And this page lists only ports
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 19, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I'm unable to vote either way until:
A) a PMC chair has been identified by the community
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our
willingness/readiness to govern ourselves. If this vote passes then
we continue by drafting
other committers that it is OK to commit
your changes and get them onto the staging server, but to wait for
publishing them.
-Rob
- Shenfeng
2012/8/19 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
Let's be careful. Don't we already have some announcement changes on
staging? If so we can bring this change
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:51 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 08:48 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/18/2012 06:38 AM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/02/2012 02:12 AM
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/18/2012 02:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 08/18/2012 06:38 AM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/02/2012 02:12 AM
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Asghar Rahmani as...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello everybody
Encouraging News! Many thanks.
A few comments to this Ammounce :
1. About the 3. link, which refers to downloading the AOO 3.4.1:
On the download page I can only find the
We've had several prods from our mentors suggesting that we are ready
to graduate. But I think there was general recognition that with
graduation comes a little hump in extra work, both for the project as
well as the IPMC and Infra, especially related to mailing list and
website changes [1]. We
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:55 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Hi,
My recollection is that the email for voting on the release said the
vote would run till tomorrow - but it sounds like formal testing is not
finished till Monday.
Should the final vote not wait till after the testing is
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:07 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 12:02 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:55 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Hi,
My recollection is that the email for voting on the release said the
vote would run till tomorrow
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012
301 - 400 of 2798 matches
Mail list logo
