In general, everyone should be familiar with this page, which
describes which licenses may be used in Apache projects:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
There is a list of licenses which are compatible, another list that is
not compatible. If we find something that is outside either of t
> Le 18/06/11 19:43, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
>> I signed up on the wiki.services.openoffice.org wiki just the other day and
>> I saw no indication of the terms of use, just the lame wiki copyright page.
There were _many_ attempts to correct the OOo Wiki licensing over the
past few years, and
Le 18/06/11 19:43, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
Hi Dennis,
> My nosing around so far leads me to believe that this is like the response to
> the Facebook "relationship" question: "It's complicated." Until Facebook, I
> had no idea how many people said that about their relationships.
>
> Some
sonal IP considerations.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:35
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: User facing web items
On 18 June 2011 19:14, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Ah, we don't need a license on
eric b wrote:
> As you can see, OpenOffice.org forks are "selectively" supported,
> what is not normal, and not the Apache spirit.
Well, as Drew explained I don't think there is a reason why OOo4Kids and
OOoLight are not explicitly named, and as a moderator of the Italian
forum surely I would an
Ross
Ross
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Ross Gardler
>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Sat, June 18, 2011 2:35:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: User facing web items
>>
>> On 18 June 2011 19:14, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> > Ah,
Hi Eric,
2011.06.18. 19:36 keltezéssel, eric b írta:
Hi,
Le 18 juin 11 à 18:55, Reizinger Zoltán a écrit :
Hi Eric,
2011.06.18. 18:33 keltezéssel, eric b írta:
OOops, sorry, should read:
"Can someone explain why OOo4Kids and OOoLight are missing in this
list ?" Regards,,
Eric Bachard
I t
On 18 June 2011 19:31, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jun 18, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
>>
>> On 18 Jun 2011, at 18:34, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>> Ross,
>>>
>>> Drew had a long description. If that gives you any clarity.
>>
>> It doe
eking an iCLA.
- Original Message
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, June 18, 2011 2:35:29 PM
> Subject: Re: User facing web items
>
> On 18 June 2011 19:14, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Ah, we don't need a license on forum
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 19:35 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 18 June 2011 19:14, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Ah, we don't need a license on forum content in order
> > to host the forums at Apache. People who post to the forums
> > are implicitly granting the right of publication thru
> > the website,
ern would be if we were trying to take forum
> content and redistribute it as OOo documentation. There
> we'd need an explicit license from the copyright author
> in the form of an ICLA.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: drew
>> To: ooo-dev@incub
On Jun 18, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
>
> On 18 Jun 2011, at 18:34, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>> Ross,
>>
>> Drew had a long description. If that gives you any clarity.
>
> It does now I've read it more carefully, thanks (and to Dr
On Jun 18, 2011, at 11:07 AM, drew wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 10:48 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> Hi Drew,
>>
>> Ross reminds me to be very careful about content licenses.
>>
>> Would you please confirm that the license for all contributions to the these
>> Forums is here - http://openoffic
Hello Eric,
Well, for those that don't know - a while back I offered to run a site
for the educoo project educoo.us.
I registered it, started it and for reasons that have nothing to do with
Eric or anyone beyond myself and my own problems totally failed to
maintain it - well beyond any point of f
--- Original Message
> From: drew
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, June 18, 2011 2:07:31 PM
> Subject: Re: User facing web items
>
> On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 10:48 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
> > Hi Drew,
> >
> > Ross reminds me to be very careful a
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 10:48 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> Ross reminds me to be very careful about content licenses.
>
> Would you please confirm that the license for all contributions to the these
> Forums is here - http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use ?
>
> If not, then where? Thanks
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 18 Jun 2011, at 18:34, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Ross,
>
> Drew had a long description. If that gives you any clarity.
It does now I've read it more carefully, thanks (and to Drew)
>
>> Can you please clarify the legal status of the content o
Hi Ross,
Le 18 juin 11 à 19:21, Ross Gardler a écrit :
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
I think you ask it on wrong place, as you a member of user forum
never posted such question.
Please ask it on EN user forum.
But should they be on the Apache use support resources?
Hi Drew,
Ross reminds me to be very careful about content licenses.
Would you please confirm that the license for all contributions to the these
Forums is here - http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use ?
If not, then where? Thanks!
Best Regards,
Dave
On Jun 18, 2011, at 10:04 AM, drew wrote:
> On
orums. Or the bugzilla either. Well, it's
complicated.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:24
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: User facing web items
Can
Hi,
Le 18 juin 11 à 18:55, Reizinger Zoltán a écrit :
Hi Eric,
2011.06.18. 18:33 keltezéssel, eric b írta:
OOops, sorry, should read:
"Can someone explain why OOo4Kids and OOoLight are missing in this
list ?" Regards,,
Eric Bachard
I think you ask it on wrong place, as you a member of use
Ross,
Drew had a long description. If that gives you any clarity.
> Can you please clarify the legal status of the content on the forums?
This is apparently the license: http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use
Here is what Zoltan wrote:
On Jun 18, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
> Hi And
derived from the LGPL3 OpenOffice.org base?
>
Is something else derived from LGPL3 OOo base.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: eric b [mailto:eric.bach...@free.fr]
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 09:32
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: User facing web
Can you please clarify the legal status of the content on the forums?
We've been told code is Apache licensed, but what about the content?
This same question applies to the content on the user mail lists (asked about
elsewhere in this thread).
Ross
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 18:25 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
> > IMHO, I'd like to see the user forums become part of the project. I
> > think user support is traditionally a function of an Apache project.
> > Although it is most commonly done with a user list, that is just an
> > i
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 18 Jun 2011, at 17:55, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 2011.06.18. 18:33 keltezéssel, eric b írta:
>> OOops, sorry, should read:
>>
>> "Can someone explain why OOo4Kids and OOoLight are missing in this list ?"
>>
>>
>> Regards,,
>> E
or
is it something else derived from the LGPL3 OpenOffice.org base?
-Original Message-
From: eric b [mailto:eric.bach...@free.fr]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 09:32
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: User facing web items
Hi,
Le 18 juin 11 à 18:25, Andrea Pescetti a écrit
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 18 Jun 2011, at 16:27, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> 2011.06.18. 16:56 keltezéssel, Ross Gardler írta:
>> On 18 Jun 2011, at 15:31, Andy Brown wrote:
>>
>>> Ross Gardler wrote:
If (and that's a big if) infra are willing to h
On Jun 18, 2011, at 9:33 AM, eric b wrote:
> OOops, sorry, should read:
>
> "Can someone explain why OOo4Kids and OOoLight are missing in this list ?"
Thanks for the reminder.
As for explanations the Apache podling and committers are still getting
organized. The project website is just there
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 08:42 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Zoltan - If you wish to get this done please contact Gavin so that the
> technical requirements plus any formal request to Oracle can be organized.
Hi Zoltan, Dave
As it happens I've have the details available and am subscribed to the
i
Hii
2011/6/18 Andrea Pescetti :
> Rob Weir wrote:
>> IMHO, I'd like to see the user forums become part of the project. I
>> think user support is traditionally a function of an Apache project.
>> Although it is most commonly done with a user list, that is just an
>> implementation detail, not the
Hi Eric,
2011.06.18. 18:33 keltezéssel, eric b írta:
OOops, sorry, should read:
"Can someone explain why OOo4Kids and OOoLight are missing in this
list ?"
Regards,,
Eric Bachard
I think you ask it on wrong place, as you a member of user forum never
posted such question.
Please ask it on
OOops, sorry, should read:
"Can someone explain why OOo4Kids and OOoLight are missing in this
list ?"
Regards,,
Eric Bachard
--
qɔᴉɹə
Education Project:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association Ed
Hi,
Le 18 juin 11 à 18:25, Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
I agree. It wouldn't make sense to lose the forums, that are a very
important resource for end-users and one of the few resources that are
still shared by OpenOffice.org and all derivatives (as the header
says, they support OpenOffice.
Rob Weir wrote:
> IMHO, I'd like to see the user forums become part of the project. I
> think user support is traditionally a function of an Apache project.
> Although it is most commonly done with a user list, that is just an
> implementation detail, not the essence of the function. Since OOo ha
On Jun 18, 2011, at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Reizinger Zoltán
> wrote:
>
>
>> The forums have link to the terms of use:
>> http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use
>> This link was on all the time while the forum runs.
>> For my best knowledge, never was problem w
Hi Ross,
2011.06.18. 16:56 keltezéssel, Ross Gardler írta:
On 18 Jun 2011, at 15:31, Andy Brown wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
If (and that's a big if) infra are willing to host software for you the license
is not an issue. We won't distribute incompatibly licensed software it but we
use it. T
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
> The forums have link to the terms of use:
> http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use
> This link was on all the time while the forum runs.
> For my best knowledge, never was problem wit that.
>
> Now it is contain ASF 2.0 license for codes, I
On 18 Jun 2011, at 15:31, Andy Brown wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>> If (and that's a big if) infra are willing to host software for you the
>> license is not an issue. We won't distribute incompatibly licensed software
>> it but we use it. The rules are to make sure users can do what ever the
Zoltan wrote:
Hi Andy,
The forums have link to the terms of use:
http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use
This link was on all the time while the forum runs.
For my best knowledge, never was problem wit that.
Now it is contain ASF 2.0 license for codes, I see no problems to
licensing.
Usually no sour
Ross Gardler wrote:
If (and that's a big if) infra are willing to host software for you the license
is not an issue. We won't distribute incompatibly licensed software it but we
use it. The rules are to make sure users can do what ever they want with our
software, when it comes to support for
Hi Andy,
2011.06.18. 15:46 keltezéssel, Andy Brown írta:
Hi Zoltan,
Zoltan wrote:
2011.06.18. 1:33 keltezéssel, Andy Brown írta:
Hi Ross,
Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17 June 2011 00:00, Andy Brown wrote:
I have seen references to "user facing" web items, web pages, wiki
and
mailing
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>> On 17 June 2011 00:00, Andy Brown wrote:
>>>>> I have seen references to "user facing" web items, web pages, wiki and
>>>>> mailing list. What will happen to the forum at
>>>>> http://user.services.openoffic
Hi Zoltan,
Zoltan wrote:
2011.06.18. 1:33 keltezéssel, Andy Brown írta:
Hi Ross,
Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17 June 2011 00:00, Andy Brown wrote:
I have seen references to "user facing" web items, web pages, wiki and
mailing list. What will happen to the for
2011.06.18. 1:33 keltezéssel, Andy Brown írta:
Hi Ross,
Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17 June 2011 00:00, Andy Brown wrote:
I have seen references to "user facing" web items, web pages, wiki and
mailing list. What will happen to the forum at
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum
ing
threads on their topic without much pain.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 16:50
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: User facing web items
On 18 June 2011 00:33, Andy Brown wrote:
> &qu
On 18 June 2011 00:33, Andy Brown wrote:
> "Is a forum the right solution today", good
> question but I have seen flame wars break out over that very topic in some
> mailing list. I prefer mailing list but understand why end users prefer a
> forum so I would support us keeping it.
:-)
Recently
Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17 June 2011 00:00, Andy Brown wrote:
I have seen references to "user facing" web items, web pages, wiki and
mailing list. What will happen to the forum at
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ ? It
Hi Ross,
Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17 June 2011 00:00, Andy Brown wrote:
I have seen references to "user facing" web items, web pages, wiki and
mailing list. What will happen to the forum at
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ ? It is an very useful user
facing asset th
On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 17 June 2011 00:00, Andy Brown wrote:
>> I have seen references to "user facing" web items, web pages, wiki and
>> mailing list. What will happen to the forum at
>> http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/foru
On 17 June 2011 00:00, Andy Brown wrote:
> I have seen references to "user facing" web items, web pages, wiki and
> mailing list. What will happen to the forum at
> http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ ? It is an very useful user
> facing asset that I would hate
I have seen references to "user facing" web items, web pages, wiki and
mailing list. What will happen to the forum at
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ ? It is an very useful
user facing asset that I would hate to see lost. If it is transfered
what will be require
52 matches
Mail list logo
