Re: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro

On Aug 29, 2011, at 9:26 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: >> any reason why we build our own preprocessors and don't use >> the C toolchain preprocessor that is already required to >> build OOo? >> > > This is an important question. If we need another > preprocessor there are options(1), but we need t

Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Oh, right. Thanks Terry, > > I forgot what the exact differentiation was. To the extent that we are > maintaining software that is not ALv2 licensed or compatible, I would think > that any SVN for it would appear to be "elsewhere" also

Re: [code] builds, runs, but doesn't fly yet

> I don't really want to downgrade my OS or Java. If someone solves the build > on 10.6 with Java 6 issue, please give a shout. checking the installed JDK... checked (JDK 1.6.0_26) Works. -- Pavel Janík

Re: [code] builds, runs, but doesn't fly yet

On Aug 29, 2011, at 10:47 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Andy Brown wrote: > >> Eike Rathke wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 01:24:28 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: >>> The current tree builds using unxlngx6.pro with gcc 4.6.1 amd64 Applications run,

Re: [code] builds, runs, but doesn't fly yet

On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Andy Brown wrote: > Eike Rathke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 01:24:28 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: >> >>> The current tree builds using unxlngx6.pro with gcc 4.6.1 amd64 >>> Applications run, smoketest is good. >> >> Same for --enable-dbgutil unxlngx6 >>

RE: A point on the OOo code -- Getting to Apache Extras

Mathias, In this thread you mentioned Apache Extras. I am curious how to support that moving ahead. So I must confess my ignorance first. Have you considered what a roadmap would be to have the CWS that need preservation moved to Apache Extras? I know we don't need everything in the CWS segm

RE: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

Oh, right. Thanks Terry, I forgot what the exact differentiation was. To the extent that we are maintaining software that is not ALv2 licensed or compatible, I would think that any SVN for it would appear to be "elsewhere" also. So the content is still off wherever the engine is running. I a

Re: Building Guide

Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Andy, On Monday, 2011-08-29 18:08:01 -0700, Andy Brown wrote: Do we have a wiki page that shows a non-programmer to build AOOo? Also a list of needed programs would be really helpful, Windows7 and Ubuntu 11.04 here. I would like to help and think this is something I can

soltools/cpp replacement options (was Re: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro)

Hi again; FWIW, This one looks like an interesting option as it is made to be embeddable too: http://code.google.com/p/ucpp/ "ucpp can be compiled as a stand-alone program, or linked to some other code; in the latter case, ucpp will output tokens, one at a time, on demand, as an integrated lex

Building Guide (was: [code] builds, runs, but doesn't fly yet)

Hi Andy, On Monday, 2011-08-29 18:08:01 -0700, Andy Brown wrote: > Do we have a wiki page that shows a non-programmer to build AOOo? > Also a list of needed programs would be really helpful, Windows7 and > Ubuntu 11.04 here. I would like to help and think this is something > I can do. There's t

Re: SVN clients: svn, git-svn

Hi, On Monday, 2011-08-29 13:03:29 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > fortunately you don't have to use the official SVN client; there are > unofficial clients that are a bit more comfortable, notably HgSubversion > and git-svn. Material that may be helpful: https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Git

Re: SVN clients: svn, git-svn

Hi, On Monday, 2011-08-29 18:11:36 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > 3. do not use svn.apache.org, but svn-master.apache.org. (see below) > > Thanks for enlightening, I already wondered why I had to run a second > git svn rebase after git svn dcommit. Changing the url in .git/config > under [svn-re

Re: [PUSHED] always-request-an-unversioned-lib-from-gcc-in-gccins

Hi Bjoern, On Monday, 2011-08-29 19:04:43 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > attached patch is one step to get OOo to build on Ubuntu, although > there might be more fixing needed. That one was authored by me and is > contributed under Apache License 2. Great, pushed https://svn.apache.org/viewvc

Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

Dennis, I just want to emphasise one of the key points that I made in my original post and which seems to have got lost in the subsequent dialogue. I differentiated between the "application" -- that is the S/W configuration based on the customisation of a FLOSS package -- which supports a se

Re: [code] builds, runs, but doesn't fly yet

Eike Rathke wrote: Hi, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 01:24:28 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: The current tree builds using unxlngx6.pro with gcc 4.6.1 amd64 Applications run, smoketest is good. Same for --enable-dbgutil unxlngx6 One thing that caught my eye because I usually set macro security to very

Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Andy Brown wrote: Rob Weir wrote: Much clipped to save space. Look at http://www.oooforum.org They get tons of traffic though they are independent of the OOo and get no advantage from the URL or any official relationship to the project. I

Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Andy Brown wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: > > > Much clipped to save space. >> >> Look at http://www.oooforum.org  They get tons of traffic though they >> are independent of the OOo and get no advantage from the URL or any >> official relationship to the project. >> > >

RE: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

I agree that some aspects should be integrated into the Apache project and that they should be housed at apache.org. Some of these are easy. Bug reporting, access to project source code (not previous releases obviously), some other things, submission of patches and subscription to ooo-dev, o

Re: [code] builds, runs, but doesn't fly yet

Hi, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 01:24:28 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > The current tree builds using unxlngx6.pro with gcc 4.6.1 amd64 > Applications run, smoketest is good. Same for --enable-dbgutil unxlngx6 > One thing that caught my eye because I usually set macro security to > very high: the dialo

Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

Rob Weir wrote: Much clipped to save space. Look at http://www.oooforum.org They get tons of traffic though they are independent of the OOo and get no advantage from the URL or any official relationship to the project. If you look on the support page at OOo you will find the oooforum liste

Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Rob, I completely disagree with embracing everything under ALv2 and exclusive > Apache Way custodianship.  I don't consider that a goal.  I don't see how > that serves the extended community at all. > I'm not talking about converting

[code] builds, runs, but doesn't fly yet

Hi, The current tree builds using unxlngx6.pro with gcc 4.6.1 amd64 Applications run, smoketest is good. One thing that caught my eye because I usually set macro security to very high: the dialog under Tools -> Options -> OpenOffice.org -> Security -> Macro Security doesn't open, just nothing hap

RE: [Repo][Proposal] NOT SO FAST ON CHANGING HEADERS

That's true. If ASF receives written permission from Oracle to make the changes, and we have the list, we can then make the changes ourselves. (My sense is that the options about this are stated in order of decreasing preference.) It is clearly in Andrew's self-interest to make that happen, if

RE: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

Rob, I completely disagree with embracing everything under ALv2 and exclusive Apache Way custodianship. I don't consider that a goal. I don't see how that serves the extended community at all. I accept that is not your position. As far as I know, the position you express is not a commonly hel

Re: [Repo][Proposal] NOT SO FAST ON CHANGING HEADERS

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > The preference for an SGA is for the *contributor* or their agent to remove > any existing headers (that they have the right to remove) and introduce the > Apache header. > > We bypassed that step in bringing the code base over the way

RE: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro

Off-hand, that is clearly not a permissive license. The substantial-use and non-commercial requirements for a separate license for such use is a show-stopper, it seems to me. I would imagine the LibreOffice folks need to pay attention to this as well, if they have not done so already. Great c

Re: [DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I've been mulling this over and I am wondering about another way to look at > the problem, building on Eike's suggestion too. > > This is not a proposal.  It is too high-level and not concrete enough with a > viable roadmap.  We need t

RE: [Repo][Proposal] NOT SO FAST ON CHANGING HEADERS

The preference for an SGA is for the *contributor* or their agent to remove any existing headers (that they have the right to remove) and introduce the Apache header. We bypassed that step in bringing the code base over the way we did. The suggestion on legal-discuss is that Andrew Rist now mak

[DISCUSS] RE: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

I've been mulling this over and I am wondering about another way to look at the problem, building on Eike's suggestion too. This is not a proposal. It is too high-level and not concrete enough with a viable roadmap. We need to see if we can find a consensus in principle and then see what kind

Re: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro

Am 29.08.2011 18:31, schrieb Stephan Bergmann: > By the way, the source code at idlc/source/preproc appears to be > copied from LCC code (see > ) and then erroneously > decorated with the OOo license header. This needs to be addressed. > Similarly, the

Re: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro

--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Michael Stahl wrote: ... > > > > With the cleanup of this license headers we can try to > > remove the code in one place and reuse it. > LCC is not copyleft and in our particular use it may be OK, but some provisions could be problematic: https://github.com/drh/lcc/blob/mas

Re: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro

On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Stephan Bergmann < > stephan.bergmann.second...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> By the way, the source code at idlc/source/preproc appears to be copied >> from LCC code (see

Re: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro

Am 29.08.2011 19:00, schrieb Michael Stahl: > On 29.08.2011 18:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Stephan Bergmann < >> stephan.bergmann.second...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> By the way, the source code at idlc/source/preproc appears to be copied >>> from LCC code (see

Re: [Repo][Proposal]After the code is checked in to SVN

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote: > Am 29.08.2011 17:30, schrieb Eike Rathke: > >> Hi Rob, >> >> On Monday, 2011-08-29 09:27:21 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> In particular, we now have unrelated changes intermingled with the >>> addition of missing files from Hg.  This means t

[PATCH] always-request-an-unversioned-lib-from-gcc-in-gccins

Hi all, attached patch is one step to get OOo to build on Ubuntu, although there might be more fixing needed. That one was authored by me and is contributed under Apache License 2. HTH, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen >From d977dace19c84931f1653cab67ef066c7f6cd8a4 Mon Sep 17

Re: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro

On 29.08.2011 18:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Stephan Bergmann < > stephan.bergmann.second...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> By the way, the source code at idlc/source/preproc appears to be copied >> from LCC code (see ) and t

Re: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Stephan Bergmann < stephan.bergmann.second...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Aug 28, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Eike Rathke wrote: > > Fourth, now I'm stuck at module offapi where idlc bails out with > completely > > senseless messages: > > > > Entering /build/aooo/main/offapi

Re: [Repo][Proposal]After the code is checked in to SVN

Am 29.08.2011 17:30, schrieb Eike Rathke: > Hi Rob, > > On Monday, 2011-08-29 09:27:21 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > >> In particular, we now have unrelated changes intermingled with the >> addition of missing files from Hg. This means that there is no >> revision in SVN that is identical to the Hg

Re: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

On 29/08/11 16:30, Michael Stahl wrote: Tried this before on projects. It really doesn't work. There are ~2,500 files of which we update about 20-30 with a single patch file. If we do it the way you suggest, we would have a huge bulk of revisions every phpBB release. It's a lot easier to keep

Re: saxon

Am 29.08.2011 17:41, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni: > Looking a bit into Matthias' list, there's the saxon issue. > > I looked for a replacement and it would look like the > Apache Xalan project could be an alternative: > >http://xalan.apache.org/ > > If, for some reason, we want to keep saxon,

Re: [code] stuck at offapi on unxlngx6.pro

On Aug 28, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Eike Rathke wrote: > Fourth, now I'm stuck at module offapi where idlc bails out with completely > senseless messages: > > Entering /build/aooo/main/offapi/com/sun/star/sdb > > Compiling: Forms.idl > ../../../../com/sun/star/ucb/Content.idl(296) : Illegal syntax follo

Re: EPM

Am 29.08.2011 17:50, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni: > > --- On Mon, 8/29/11, Mathias Bauer wrote: > ... >> >> On Linux it always was needed in OOo, either from system or >> - in case >> BUILD_EPM=YES - from the ooo module epm. If you want to do >> it differently, send patches. :-) >> > > If I ever

Re: Blank in folder name

Hi Mathias, On Monday, 2011-08-29 15:29:03 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: > >main/writerfilter/source/odiapi/qname/resource/office2003/WordProcessingML > >Schemas A wonderful opportunity to get rid of ugly blanks in paths.. Let's make that WordProcessingML_Schemas instead. Eike -- PGP/OpenPG

Re: EPM

Hi Pedro, On Monday, 2011-08-29 07:53:26 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > Hmm.. investigating a bit, we use --with-epm=internal That will of course vanish as there won't be an internal EPM anymore. configure will have to handle that then. Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred

Re: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

Hi Rob, On Monday, 2011-08-29 10:57:14 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > How about: > > * incubator/ooo/forum/trunk/ > * incubator/ooo/wiki/trunk/ > > In other words, keep "site" for the markdown/Apache CMS website, > keeping that name by convention, but putting other services in their > own T

Re: SVN clients: svn, git-svn

Hi Michael, On Monday, 2011-08-29 13:03:29 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > fortunately you don't have to use the official SVN client; there are > unofficial clients that are a bit more comfortable, notably HgSubversion > and git-svn. Which I happily use from the beginning, I think I mentioned it e

Re: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

On Aug 29, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 29.08.2011 16:40, Terry Ellison wrote: >> Thanks for comments. Rob. I was hoping to get your and others thoughts >> on this TLD structure issue: Where do we plug the wiki, the forums, the >> other website services into our svn hierarchy (

Re: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Terry Ellison wrote: >> Thanks for comments. Rob. I was hoping to get your and others thoughts on >> this TLD structure issue: Where do we plug the wiki, the forums, the other >> website services into our svn hier

Re: [Repo][Proposal] NOT SO FAST ON CHANGING HEADERS

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > OK, > > I assume that, for an Apache Project, the standard license header is the one > without copyright notices and beginning "Licensed to the Apache Software > Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license agreements."  Is

Re: EPM

--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Mathias Bauer wrote: ... > > On Linux it always was needed in OOo, either from system or > - in case > BUILD_EPM=YES - from the ooo module epm. If you want to do > it differently, send patches. :-) > If I ever work on the build system, it will be very differently ... with C

saxon

Looking a bit into Matthias' list, there's the saxon issue. I looked for a replacement and it would look like the Apache Xalan project could be an alternative: http://xalan.apache.org/ If, for some reason, we want to keep saxon, please note: - In principle it would seem like it's required by

Re: [discuss][www][wiki] Native-lang sites was Web, WIki, and Participation

Hi Raphael-- see below On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi at all > > To understand the NLC Sites, it's maybe important to understand the NLC > Site. In difference to server side projects, the normal OOo User has no > technicaly background, and a load of them are also n

Re: [Repo][Proposal]After the code is checked in to SVN

Am 29.08.2011 17:13, schrieb Michael Stahl: > On 29.08.2011 15:27, Rob Weir wrote: >> I sent this note out a week ago. We discussed and generally agreed to >> this proposal. I certainly did not see any objections. But this plan >> appears to have been generally ignored. >> >> In particular, we

Re: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

On 29.08.2011 16:40, Terry Ellison wrote: > Thanks for comments. Rob. I was hoping to get your and others thoughts > on this TLD structure issue: Where do we plug the wiki, the forums, the > other website services into our svn hierarchy (where =the relevant > service): > * incubator/oo

Re: [Repo][Proposal]After the code is checked in to SVN

Hi Rob, On Monday, 2011-08-29 09:27:21 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > In particular, we now have unrelated changes intermingled with the > addition of missing files from Hg. This means that there is no > revision in SVN that is identical to the Hg tip. This is unfortunate. > It will make some approach

Re: EPM

Am 29.08.2011 16:53, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni: > > --- On Mon, 8/29/11, Mathias Bauer wrote: > >> >> OOo always used EPM for package creation by default. My >> first patch for disabling copyleft components removed >> that, now I brought it back again. >> If you had your own way, you probably

Re: OOO Test Bugzilla instance

Just skimming through this thread in the archives. I am not subscribed so ooo-dev so please don't assume I have read any of the threads here. If there are issues, ask questions on the infrastructure mailing list, comment on the existing Jira ticket for the ooo-bz migration or create a new Jira tic

Re: [Repo][Proposal]After the code is checked in to SVN

On 29.08.2011 15:27, Rob Weir wrote: > I sent this note out a week ago. We discussed and generally agreed to > this proposal. I certainly did not see any objections. But this plan > appears to have been generally ignored. > > In particular, we now have unrelated changes intermingled with the > a

Re: OOO Test Bugzilla instance

--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Rob Weir wrote: ... > > For the production instance, are we preserving the > original login/passwords, or will they also be all > set to "password"? > I understand, from the comment in JIRA, that people will have to reset them from their email accounts. Pedro.

Re: OOO Test Bugzilla instance

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 29/08/2011 15:48, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> As per [1], all user passwords (except those for ASF infra users with >>> system admin privs) have been reset to: >>> >>> password >>> >>> Assumin

Re: OOO Test Bugzilla instance

On 29/08/2011 15:48, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> As per [1], all user passwords (except those for ASF infra users with >> system admin privs) have been reset to: >> >> password >> >> Assuming no show stopper issues are reported on [1] before 23.59 UTC >

Re: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Terry Ellison wrote: > Thanks for comments. Rob.  I was hoping to get your and others thoughts on > this TLD structure issue:  Where do we plug the wiki, the forums, the other > website services into our svn hierarchy (where =the relevant service): >   * incub

Re: EPM

--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Mathias Bauer wrote: > > OOo always used EPM for package creation by default. My > first patch for disabling copyleft components removed > that, now I brought it back again. > If you had your own way, you probably had your own > configure switches to work with it. > I hope

Re: OOO Test Bugzilla instance

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > As per [1], all user passwords (except those for ASF infra users with > system admin privs) have been reset to: > > password > > Assuming no show stopper issues are reported on [1] before 23.59 UTC > Monday 29 August 2011 then ASF infra will wo

Re: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

Thanks for comments. Rob. I was hoping to get your and others thoughts on this TLD structure issue: Where do we plug the wiki, the forums, the other website services into our svn hierarchy (where =the relevant service): * incubator/ooo/site/trunk/ or * incubator/ooo/site//tr

Re: [Proposal] Give the BHV publishing house in Kaarst/Germany the permission to use the OpenOffice.org trademark and logo

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Peter Junge wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 29.08.2011 22:08, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Peter Junge  wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to propose --*seeking lazy consensus*-- that the BHV >>> publishing >>> GmbH, Novesiastrasse 60, D-41

Re: [Proposal] Give the BHV publishing house in Kaarst/Germany the permission to use the OpenOffice.org trademark and logo

Hi Rob, On 29.08.2011 22:08, Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Peter Junge wrote: Hi, I would like to propose --*seeking lazy consensus*-- that the BHV publishing GmbH, Novesiastrasse 60, D-41564 Kaarst (Germany) is permitted to use the OpenOffice.org logo and trademark for th

Re: [Proposal] Give the BHV publishing house in Kaarst/Germany the permission to use the OpenOffice.org trademark and logo

Hi Shane, On 29.08.2011 08:16, Shane Curcuru wrote: (Apologies; I've been planning a funeral and then fleeing a hurricane. Note that this thread spans both private and public lists) My sincere condolence. In general I first refer people to our policies or any published FAQs, and I believe t

Re: [Proposal] Give the BHV publishing house in Kaarst/Germany the permission to use the OpenOffice.org trademark and logo

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Peter Junge wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose --*seeking lazy consensus*-- that the BHV publishing > GmbH, Novesiastrasse 60, D-41564 Kaarst (Germany) is permitted to use the > OpenOffice.org logo and trademark for their book (in preparation) > "OpenOffice.

Re: [Proposal] Give the BHV publishing house in Kaarst/Germany the permission to use the OpenOffice.org trademark and logo

Hi, On 29.08.2011 03:22, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Hello For your lazy consensus, when is the expiration at which time you propose to act? a lazy consensus is not necessary. OK, I see. Also, because this is a matter involving legalities, I'm not sure lazy consensus works here. We n

Re: SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Terry Ellison wrote: > I have tracked the various svn discussions on the DL so far.  This note is > to initiate a discussion on the specific topic of how we should organise the > top-level-directory (TLD) structure within svn.  As I have mentioned > elsewhere, fami

Re: Blank in folder name

I have svn 1.6.12 on Ubuntu. It doesn't work no matter if I have the offending folder name as part of the commit statement or not. Perhaps someone else could transfer the missing files from a Mercurial repo and commit them? These are the last two missing files. Regards, Mathias On 29.08.201

Re: EPM

On 29.08.2011 15:45, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:16:03 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: Moin, ... I committed a patch that enables EPM as installed in the system. Of course that makes EPM a build requirement. Hmmm ... of course some of us don't use linux and create our own pack

Re: SVN clients: svn, git-svn

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > Great info Michael, someone should make a wiki page of that. > Yes, great information. It would be good on either on the Dev FAQ's: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/developer-faqs.html Or on the wiki with a link from the Dev FAQ

Re: EPM

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:16:03 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: Moin, ... I committed a patch that enables EPM as installed in the system. Of course that makes EPM a build requirement. Hmmm ... of course some of us don't use linux and create our own packages without EPM. Regards, Pedro.

Re: Blank in folder name

For me it just works, using the latest 1.6.x code. Mathias Bauer wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 15:29:03 +0200: > Moin, > > somebody had the wonderful idea to give a folder in our repository a > name with a blank. Unfortunately this folder misses two files that > couldn't be imported. I tried to a

Blank in folder name

Moin, somebody had the wonderful idea to give a folder in our repository a name with a blank. Unfortunately this folder misses two files that couldn't be imported. I tried to add them, but I can't get subversion to cope with the "blank" in the folder name. Here's the location: main/writerf

Re: [Repo][Proposal]After the code is checked in to SVN

I sent this note out a week ago. We discussed and generally agreed to this proposal. I certainly did not see any objections. But this plan appears to have been generally ignored. In particular, we now have unrelated changes intermingled with the addition of missing files from Hg. This means tha

EPM

Moin, we need EPM to build packages on Linux. As we don't want to keep EPM in our repository, we have to use an EPM installed in the system. According to the documentation on their website and several other sites using EPM does not influence the license of the software that is packed, though

svn ignore

Moin, for those who forgot how to tell svn to ignore the output trees or those who never knew how to do that, here's some help: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Setting_up_Subversion_Access#Ignoring_output_trees I prefer to do that in the subversion config file, as described in the a

Re: SVN clients: svn, git-svn

Also, http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache On 29 Aug 2011, at 12:10, Gavin McDonald wrote: > Great info Michael, someone should make a wiki page of that. > > Oh, and I'm not going to make your life easier at all :- > > http://git.apache.org/ > > :) > > Open an infra issue if (yeah right

SVN and bringing the total end-to-end OOo project under Configuration Management

I have tracked the various svn discussions on the DL so far. This note is to initiate a discussion on the specific topic of how we should organise the top-level-directory (TLD) structure within svn. As I have mentioned elsewhere, family circumstances have underlined that any of use could sudd

RE: SVN clients: svn, git-svn

Great info Michael, someone should make a wiki page of that. Oh, and I'm not going to make your life easier at all :- http://git.apache.org/ :) Open an infra issue if (yeah right) you would like a ooo git clone set up there. Gav... > -Original Message- > From: Michael Stahl [mailto:m

SVN clients: svn, git-svn

hi all, i've checked out the Apache OOo trunk yesterday and committed some changes required to build it on my system. the official SVN client (version 1.6.17) likes to store every file that is checked out in uncompressed form, which takes a lot of space. > > du -sh trunk/ > 4,2G trunk/ fortu

Re: svn commit: r1162610 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main: binfilter/bf_sfx2/source/doc/ binfilter/bf_starmath/source/ binfilter/bf_svtools/source/misc/ chart2/source/view/main/ slideshow/source/engine/

Hi Mathias, On Monday, 2011-08-29 10:44:56 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: > Which distribution comes with gcc 4.6 as default? Debian wheezy. Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05F

Re: [wiki] current status of MediaWiki VM

Kay, My sister-in-law's husband has recently had a massive stroke quite "out of the blue" and his condition is still critical. As we are both good friends and family, we've had to reprioritise in the short term to be around for them, though my wife Jan is doing most of this. As soon as I ca

Re: svn commit: r1162610 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main: binfilter/bf_sfx2/source/doc/ binfilter/bf_starmath/source/ binfilter/bf_svtools/source/misc/ chart2/source/view/main/ slideshow/source/engine/

Answering to myself, looks like ArchLinux too switched for gcc-4.6.x. Probably other distributions did. -- qɔᴉɹə Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news

Re: svn commit: r1162610 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main: binfilter/bf_sfx2/source/doc/ binfilter/bf_starmath/source/ binfilter/bf_svtools/source/misc/ chart2/source/view/main/ slideshow/source/engine/

Hi Mathias, Le 29 août 11 à 10:44, Mathias Bauer a écrit : Which distribution comes with gcc 4.6 as default? The only one I'm aware is Debian armhf (experimental at the moment), due to some asm optimisations for Neon and the FPU. Regards, Eric -- qɔᴉɹə Education Project: http://wiki.

Re: [migration][web] Scripted Conversions.

Thanks for your great work. I've a recommendation when adding+committing the "development" project. As there are billions of release notes I would only commit the latest into SVN and pack the others into a ZIP file; split into Beta, RC, nightly build, etc. Release notes from OOo 2.0 (from 20

Re: svn commit: r1162610 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main: binfilter/bf_sfx2/source/doc/ binfilter/bf_starmath/source/ binfilter/bf_svtools/source/misc/ chart2/source/view/main/ slideshow/source/engine/

On 29.08.2011 10:44, Mathias Bauer wrote: > On 29.08.2011 10:35, Michael Stahl wrote: > >>> Is it wise to fix the code for gcc 4.6 *now*? Every fix might introduce >>> new bugs and gcc 4.6 is not the "standard" compiler nowadays (AFAIK). >> >> please note that i will have a difficult time contribu

Re: svn commit: r1162610 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main: binfilter/bf_sfx2/source/doc/ binfilter/bf_starmath/source/ binfilter/bf_svtools/source/misc/ chart2/source/view/main/ slideshow/source/engine/

On 29.08.2011 10:35, Michael Stahl wrote: Is it wise to fix the code for gcc 4.6 *now*? Every fix might introduce new bugs and gcc 4.6 is not the "standard" compiler nowadays (AFAIK). please note that i will have a difficult time contributing if i can't build the code :) Which distribution c

Re: svn commit: r1162610 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main: binfilter/bf_sfx2/source/doc/ binfilter/bf_starmath/source/ binfilter/bf_svtools/source/misc/ chart2/source/view/main/ slideshow/source/engine/

On 29.08.2011 10:29, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On Aug 29, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: On 29.08.2011 02:36, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Michael, On Sunday, 2011-08-28 23:34:31 -, m...@apache.org wrote: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162610&view=rev Log: unotools: OOutputStreamW

Re: svn commit: r1162609 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main: autodoc/inc/ary/idl/ basegfx/source/polygon/ chart2/source/controller/main/ dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ hwpfilter/source/ libwpd/ moz/ moz

On 29.08.2011 02:27, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sunday, 2011-08-28 23:23:03 -, m...@apache.org wrote: > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162609&view=rev > >> --- incubator/ooo/trunk/main/autodoc/inc/ary/idl/i_ce2s.hxx (original) >> +++ incubator/ooo/trunk/main/autodoc/i

Re: svn commit: r1162610 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main: binfilter/bf_sfx2/source/doc/ binfilter/bf_starmath/source/ binfilter/bf_svtools/source/misc/ chart2/source/view/main/ slideshow/source/engine/

On 29.08.2011 09:36, Mathias Bauer wrote: > On 29.08.2011 02:36, Eike Rathke wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On Sunday, 2011-08-28 23:34:31 -, m...@apache.org wrote: >> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162610&view=rev >>> Log: >>> unotools: OOutputStreamWrapper: >>> >>> remove invocatio

Re: svn commit: r1162610 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main: binfilter/bf_sfx2/source/doc/ binfilter/bf_starmath/source/ binfilter/bf_svtools/source/misc/ chart2/source/view/main/ slideshow/source/engine/

On Aug 29, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: > On 29.08.2011 02:36, Eike Rathke wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On Sunday, 2011-08-28 23:34:31 -, m...@apache.org wrote: >> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162610&view=rev >>> Log: >>> unotools: OOutputStreamWrapper: >>> >>> remove

Re: [discuss][www][wiki] Native-lang sites was Web, WIki, and Participation

Am 08/29/2011 03:20 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: It strikes me that the list at the end of your note is best supported on openoffice.org where it now is, probably updated over time as the Apache podling graduates to Top-Level Project. It is where people already know to go. The only questio

Re: svn commit: r1162610 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main: binfilter/bf_sfx2/source/doc/ binfilter/bf_starmath/source/ binfilter/bf_svtools/source/misc/ chart2/source/view/main/ slideshow/source/engine/

On 29.08.2011 02:36, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Michael, On Sunday, 2011-08-28 23:34:31 -, m...@apache.org wrote: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162610&view=rev Log: unotools: OOutputStreamWrapper: remove invocation of DECLARE_UNO3_AGG_DEFAULTS (symbols are somehow not exported wit