here, I'll
propose that we delete the blog altogether. So far, its existence has
received more note in the press for lack of updates than for any
content there. I'd rather have no blog if we can't do better than
that.
-Rob
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Sep 28, 2011 3:06 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So total silence. Is that the best we can come up with?
One problem is that what
2011/9/28 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So total silence. Is that the best we can come up with?
hopefully not
I'll sign up for the next post, planning on one related to the IP
review of AOOo, to give
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi at all
To ensure that the code is buildable on any System, we should have
frequently builds on any system. I ask here who does frequently builds, and
on wich system.
Normaly I make one build per day if I see same
-
From: Michael Stahl [mailto:m...@openoffice.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 15:50
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll -
issue 88652
On 27.09.2011 22:22, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Dennis E
: [legal] How to clarify, if usage of Boost C++ source libraries is
allowed
Hi,
here is the link to the submitted JIRA issue -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-101
Best regards, Oliver.
On 27.09.2011 14:59, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 27.09.2011 14:16, Rob Weir
, there was
never discussion on this list about requesting it.
The discussion about the Bugzilla notification bouncing was in a
thread called Bugzilla e-mail is bouncing and other e-mail issues,
starting on Sept 5th.
-Rob
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Follow up to my
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
It is still early enough to reunify the code base and use the well
known brand OpenOffice for a binary release. It would be the best
choice for our users.
Please correct me if
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 09/27/2011 08:58 PM, schrieb Jean-Philippe MENGUAL:
Hi Jean-Philippe,
As ordinary blind user, I work very much to promote OOo and
accessibility free software for blind people. The current problem is
that public
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 September 2011 13:45, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
It is still early enough to reunify the code
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
If TDF wants to take the AOOo source code and build it, with or
without enhancements, and release it under the name LibreOffice for
use with Linux distros, then they are welcome to do that. They need
no additional
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
2011/9/28 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So total silence. Is that the best we can come up
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If you mean ODMA.h, I don't believe there is any dependency on it and you
should just get rid of it.
If you need to deal with it as third-party code, I can get you a version with
a BSD-variant license that
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: A systematic approach to IP review?
On 19.09.2011 02:27, Rob Weir wrote:
1) We need to get all files needed for the build into SVN. Right now
there are some that are copied down from the OpenOffice.org website
during the build's bootstrap process. Until we get the files
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Let me recall the bidding a little here. What I said was
It is unlikely that machine-generated files of any kind are copyrightable
subject matter.
You point out that computer-generated files might
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
the low-hanging fruits are hanging quite high ;-)
Thus, as given at [1], we can get file ksc5601.h from [2] under a Apache
permissive license.
Unfortunately, the provided file [3] does not contain a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
Hi Oliver;
--- On Thu, 9/29/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
...
Thanks for the input.
Adding the URL for the origin of the copyright and license
text is a good idea. I will add it and use it also to point
to
A recent press article suggested that this project had not had any new
committers since the project started. This is false. But it would be
hard to tell that, looking at our mailing list or website.
So far we've been quiet about new committers. We have the votes,
process the paper work, etc.,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:54 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:00:04 +0200
Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
snipped - synopsis of the proposed move of forums to Apache
It is is still a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:33 AM, TJ Frazier tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
On 9/27/2011 20:37, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 9/27/2011 17:03, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
I'm assuming this is the link:
http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/Wiki/statistics
That should be a good assumption, but no. It's busted
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Sep 29, 2011 6:01 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
A recent press article suggested that this project had not had any new
committers since
,
documentation, suggestions, and criticism. [1]
So all committers are contributors, but not all contributors are (yet)
committers.
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#roles
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/people.html
Don
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Rob Weir
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
It has been the practice, thus far, that all newly-invited committers are
invited to also be on the Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC). Some
decline being on the PPMC, some accept, some accept but don't
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:15:52 -0400
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
snip
By my count we have 72 committers right now, almost all of them also
PPMC members. With the new IBMers coming on board, as well as
possibly
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
What is the actual current harm you are seeking to correct, Rob? I had
assumed this sort of lock-down would wait until graduation from the incubator
once it was clear what worked and what didn't.
Simon, I'm a PPMC
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 30 Sep 2011, at 15:58, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
What is the actual current harm you are seeking to correct, Rob? I had
assumed this sort of lock-down
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 30 Sep 2011, at 16:06, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 30 Sep 2011, at 15:58, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Phipps si
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 30, 2011, at 8:06 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 30 Sep 2011, at 15:58, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Phipps si
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
The assumption behind this recommendation seems to be that all
mail clients are the same and the list is read the same by
everyone.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
BTW, LO/TDF has a steering committee of what? 13 people total? Have
you recommending to them that they put their entire elected membership
a different solution to the same problem? Or a different
problem altogether? If the former, then what went wrong there that
leads Simon to make a different recommendation for AOOo?
-Rob
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Sep 30, 2011 6:28 PM, Rob Weir robw
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 30 Sep 2011, at 18:47, Rob Weir wrote:
I agree let's not make it adversarial. But I would be interested to
know why Simon speaks up in favor of us have a congress-sized PMC,
I said nothing of the kind, please stop
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 30 Sep 2011, at 19:15, Rob Weir wrote:
We have never adopted a formal position of having everyone be a
committer and PPMC member. So if we did not change anything, we would
still not have such a policy. I'm
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 30 Sep 2011, at 19:15, Rob Weir wrote:
We have never adopted a formal position of having everyone be a
committer and PPMC member. So if we did
The Apache OOo PPMC announces the addition of committer Pedro Giffuni:
pfg @ apache.org.
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since
there is no need to go via the
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
There has been a proposal to try and get ODF recognised as an official
extension of HTML5. On the face of it it sounds a good idea but I
don't know enough about the details or whether this is already in
progress. I guess it
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:14 PM, FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr wrote:
Good morning,
TDF has published a fix for LibO: http://wp.me/p1byPE-bQ
Do you know if OOo is impacted too?
Thank you
Possibly, but without details it is hard to tell. But please note
that although the LO press release
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3926
ooo-general-ja/AT/incubator.apache.org was created.
Thanks!
2 Japanese moderators and 2 Japanese volunteer testers are testing the list.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am invited to a presentation of AOOo in southwest
Germany, later this month.
Is there already a presentation of AOOo about
people, goals, strategies, roadmap, etc.?
Maybe Don has something from the Oxford
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I notice that it is possible to know who are the PMC members of a top-level
project (although it takes some work).
I have not found any visible place where Incubator PPMC rosters can be found
automatically.
I think
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 15:26 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
Reading binary file formats, including the legacy MS Office
formats, is notoriously difficult to do robustly.
Agreed.
2) That security reports
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:45:34 -0400
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Security reports come from security
reporters. Can you tell us whether Red Hat, Inc. security
researcher Huzaifa Sidhpurwala is a TDF member
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 10 Oct 2011, at 12:45, Rob Weir wrote:
No objections if you want to start a separate invitation-only security
discussion list. It would probably get some use. But we'll continue
to ask for security reports to come
server. I don't know if OpenOffice 3.3 is eating
up Windows Desktop Heap and a faster rate than OpenOffice 2.4. I will have
to get a Windows 2003 Server VM going at some point to check that out.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 09
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
orcmid note=Responses to Rob's questions in-line /
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 17:48
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Yes. I've read all the emails from last week.
Please can you answer my question, then, I am not interested in your
argument with Meeks.
I've
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:10:27 -0400:
we're supposed to subscribe to that list using our Apache alias.
Untrue.
Of course it is true. If you don't subscribe with something that is
in the alias
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I've restated, in more explicit form, what I think the consensus is.
It's hard to read your words that way, as they leave no room for anyone but
Apache
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
Hi Dennis,
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 08:03 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
How is it that this reciprocal action occurred and was made known to
the Apache OOo podling ?
Oh - it's quite simple, you ASF/OOo made
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Yuri Dario mc6...@mclink.it wrote:
Hi all,
my name is Yuri Dario and in the past years I worked on the os2 port
of OpenOffice.org; that work started with OOo 2.0 until version 3.2
released last year.
Hi Yuri,
Welcome to the project and welcome to Apache!
Does anyone have a good example of a really slow spreadsheet document?
Preferably ones that was slow due to computation/calculation, and one
that is not merely slow due to size alone.
I was talking to someone earlier who had ideas for speeding up
spreadsheet computation through parallelization,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
snip
All I'm doing is suggesting that we treat AOOo security like we do
for every other Apache project.
Sounds great - lets have open-ness to other projects, and
cross-fertilisation of list composition
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de wrote:
Am 10.10.2011 22:24, Rob Weir wrote:
Does anyone have a good example of a really slow spreadsheet document?
Preferably ones that was slow due to computation/calculation, and one
that is not merely slow due to size
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Joost Andrae joost.and...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
just a remark:
In my private opinion it would make more sense to invest resources into
impementing a formula reference which points to expanded formula cells
(/edit/fill) like it is already done for formatting
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote:
Got issues connecting to the mysql website.
Please confirm:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/
Is anyone *actively* working on migrating the wiki over to Apache? Or
should we start working on writing a
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
The Draft Proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org Forums
within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling is available on the Apache OO.o
Community Wiki at
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote:
The Draft Proposal for governance and operation
To enable list-based discussion of the proposal, I'm pasting in the
current wiki markup. This will allow anyone to enter inline
commentary, as a response, to the quoted original.
-Rob
---
h1. Changes to integrate the forums into the AOOo project
h2. 1. Community
The
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I am not sure that a complete list is being dealt with in the manner Shane is
requesting.
Like anything happens around here based on someone's request?
Remember, most people here are volunteers, not employees. I
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
To enable list-based discussion of the proposal, I'm pasting in the
current wiki markup. This will allow anyone to enter inline
commentary, as a response, to the quoted original.
-Rob
---
h1. Changes
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- On Tue, 10/11/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
This is really quite simple. The legacy website
I was making a list yesterday of what I thought the most
critical parts of the legacy website are. My list
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 11 October 2011 22:05, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 15:13:31 -0400:
To enable list-based discussion of the proposal, I'm pasting in the
current wiki markup
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Volunteers are registered users of the forum(s) with a post count of
over 200 (or another lower limit), who visit and post regularly to
answer questions, report spam and in general show commitment to the
forum(s),
) as the community grows.
On 10/11/2011 4:32 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
...snip...
*C.* Forum admins must sign the ICLA. They will interact with the
Apache Infra group and should be official project members. At least
one Moderator, who will sign
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 10/11/2011 8:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Shane Curcurua...@shanecurcuru.org
wrote:
...snip...
Actually anyone is welcome to work with Apache infra on their normal
mailing
lists
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Before I sign off I'd like to see the report address external
communications explicitly.
The project has a real problem right now with asserting itself as the
OpenOffice.org project and defining how it will
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 10/12/2011 8:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Before I sign off I'd like to see the report address external
communications explicitly
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi;
--- On Wed, 10/12/11, Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com wrote:
Hi Pedro,
On 12.10.2011 03:43, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
I committed it as revision 1182166, and noted it in
the bug report, but I admit
.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 06:05
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: PMC report for October 2011
On 12 October 2011 13:51, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Rob,
On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
snip
I think that we as the AOOo PPMC will need to find one or more PPMC
members
I'll provide a PPMC Status: Bringing Initial Committers On-Board update on
ooo-dev tonight and then reflect that state on the PMC report for October
2011.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 17:25
To: ooo-dev
the benefit we're going
to personally achieve from writing such reports ;-)
-Rob
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 09:53
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: PMC report for October 2011
On Wed, Oct 12
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
Rob,
On Oct
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Are there any plans to preserve archives of any existing @oo.o mailing
lists? I didn't see a treatment of archives on the planning page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Mailing+lists
This was
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
OK, so there was the Community Council and the ESC, as well as the leads
and participants on an array of Projects that worked on specific areas of
OOo code, websites, outreach, conferences, everything.
Since all these
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 10/12/2011 8:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
...snip...
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Shane Curcurua...@shanecurcuru.org
wrote:
I'm just trying to understand what some of the other previous
expectations
around OOo
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Shane,
If you register on the openoffice.org site (recommended), and are logged in,
you will find something amazing at
http://openoffice.org/projects/www/lists.
Those are not all of the lists. There are, in
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
Shane,
done, and sent out a welcome mail, please confirm if this got through to
your list,
Martin
Martin, I did see two notes come through to the ooo-security list from
securityteam. However, my
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
On 10/12/2011 05:47 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
[...]
Oh yes, it was not that big, but it touched a lot of files
which made it difficult to get the context. In any case
big patches are sometimes necessary and I was confident
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:00 AM, TJ Frazier tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
On 10/13/2011 07:39, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
Shane,
done, and sent out a welcome mail, please confirm if this got through to
your list
to know what your email address you're
registered at the openoffice.org site ?
My OOo ID is: robweir. That is associated with email address:
robw...@apache.org
Thanks!
-Rob
Martin
Am 13.10.2011 13:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Are there any plans to preserve archives of any existing @oo.o mailing
lists? I didn't see a treatment of archives on the planning page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Mailing+lists
Obviously
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Are there any plans to preserve archives of any existing @oo.o mailing
lists? I didn't see a treatment of archives on the planning page:
https
2011/10/12 Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com:
Hi Dennis and all,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Do you have the message that came back with the rejected post?
Yes, I do.
It was like the following.
---
from Mail
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Gavin McDonald san
http://blogs.apache.org/OOo/
Do you know that this blog post was published and is live on the blog
website? And went to the Apache planet aggregator, etc?
If you want to do testing, then better
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
(Using [1] as an illustration. I recommend [2] for further reading.
Please jump in where I've been unclear)
Thanks for writing this up. I'm going to restate what I think you
said in my own words, just
The legacy OpenOffice.org project had an instance [1] of a source code
searching, cross reference application called OpenGrok[2]. It is
very useful, especially in a 6 million LOC project like OOo.
Have we ever used OpenGrok at Apache? If not, is there an alternative
that other projects are
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
One of the comments on the Foundation blog is:
Unless I'm mistaken, nothing has happened in the last 6 months:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300;
It is perfectly understandable why someone would make this
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
And while we are at it can we do anything about
https://www.ohloh.net/p/openoffice - why did we create a new OhLoh
project rather than update the old one?
As previously discussed, this is work in progress. I've
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
One of the comments on the Foundation blog is:
Unless I'm mistaken, nothing has happened
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler
=more comments inline
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 06:10
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Publishing the PPMC Roster
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Dennis E. Hamiltonorc...@apache.org
wrote
Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 18:22
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Publishing the PPMC Roster
orcmid note=Responses to Rob's questions in-line /
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi guys,
Just to check ... The Croatian dictionary has been re-submitted
under an Apache License 2 (bug 96705), however the zip file
submitted still contains the LGPL in the makefile.
We should try to get the author to
Ideally, 3 or 4 moderators, geographically dispersed. More is fine as well.
Thanks!
-Rob
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 16 Oct 2011, at 21:07, Rob Weir wrote:
Ideally, 3 or 4 moderators, geographically dispersed. More is fine as well.
So far moderating ooo-users hasn't been burdensome, so I'd be happy to
volunteer to moderate
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Paul paul.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 16 Oct 2011, at 21:07, Rob Weir wrote:
Ideally, 3 or 4 moderators
I'm making a proposal now to shut down the legacy OOo mailing lists
and direct the existing subscribers to one of the AOOo mailing lists.
I realize that this is not the solution that many of us would prefer,
but I believe that it is the best way forward that anyone is willing
to volunteer to lead.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 21:39:12 +0200:
svnrdump dump -r 49548 $SOURCE_REPOS 1
ed 1
svnrdump load $TARGET_REPOS 1
svn pl --revprop -r0 $TARGET_REPOS
[ edit the svn:sync-* revprops ]
I like
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I like your proposal. I have some comments inline.
On Oct 16, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
I'm making a proposal now to shut down the legacy OOo mailing lists
and direct the existing subscribers to one
601 - 700 of 2798 matches
Mail list logo
