Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad Apple versions

Well, I don’t think this will be popular, but I think that a lot of these problems are caused by treating ooRexx as an application. To me ooRexx is a tool used to create applications, like clang, or python. I use the MacPorts package manager, and have tried Brew and fink package managers, and t

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Creating USB stick versions

In some companies, the security on company computers is such that reading, writing, and executing or even mounting usb drives is blocked. Have your former students tried to execute programs from USB drives? Also, there are several different environments for deploying “portable apps”. Since we

Re: [Oorexx-devel] open() option APPEND

Eric, To your point #2. In looking at other implementations of Rexx, I found that some implementations note that if you move the write pointer to someplace in the existing file, and then write, the file will be truncated to that written data. This led me to the realization that the write poin

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5 installer for Mac OS

I’ve been thinking about this for a while. In my opinion, for Mac OS, I don’t know that we need an ‘installer'. I generally download and compile ooRexx. ooRexx, at least on Mac OS doesn’t require a GUI. There is no ooDialog for Mac OS. Also, at least for Mac Ports, the build script can put tog

Re: [Oorexx-devel] oosqlite.so

Just guessing, but I would think that the liboosqlite.so would be in /usr/lib, not /usr/bin. Bruce > On Nov 13, 2020, at 3:41 PM, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > > I'll admit that I am confused at the moment. > > I downloaded oosqlite for LINUX from sourceforge.net ooREXX > > followed the instr

Re: [Oorexx-devel] R5 linein/lineout DRAMATIC slowdown???

Were the both fresh compiles, with the same compiler and build environment and optimization options? Something has obviously changed. > On Sep 26, 2020, at 12:32 AM, WalterPachl wrote: > > What am I doing wrong? > > R5beta takes about 25 times the elapsed time of R4.2 > > /* > E:\>rexx tio >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Jenkins

I believe that RPi2 is 32bit. You will need either an RPi3 or RPi4 for 64 bit. You will also need to download a beta version of Raspberry Pi OS that is 64 bit. Until the recently released RPi4 8GB, all versions of Raspberry Pi OS were 32 bit. This simplified their software distribution, need

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Performance

That sounds about right 90% of one cpu is 22.5% In my experiments on a 4 core raspberry pi, I could drive 3 cores to 95%+ and the last core to about 75%. Jim could try running 4 concurrent copies of his program to verify this. Another issue, is that if you drive the cpu so hard that it starts

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [oorexx:bugs] Re: #1475 ooRexx (r11290) doesn't exit cleanly on macOS

I just did a SVN update (11290), cmake, and make. It exits cleanly here. Mac OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite. Compiler: Apple LLVM version 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.53) (based on LLVM 3.6.0svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.5.0 Thread model: posix Bruce > On Aug 24, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Erich Steinböck > wrote:

Re: [Oorexx-devel] MacOSX plist-file to have rxapi run as a service using launchctl

bing that on MacOSX the > launcher tries to restart the running rxapi daemon every ten seconds in vain > (for stability reasons "keepalive" needs to be set IMHO). > ---rony > > > On 23.05.2017 16:14, CVBruce wrote: >> I think I originally wrote this plist f

Re: [Oorexx-devel] MacOSX plist-file to have rxapi run as a service using launchctl

No, I sent is to Mark. Remember this is probably at least 5 years ago. Bruce > On May 23, 2017, at 7:53 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > did you post it to the list? > > René. > >> On 23 May 2017, at 16:42, CVBruce wrote: >> >> I have no idea where my mod

Re: [Oorexx-devel] MacOSX plist-file to have rxapi run as a service using launchctl

I have no idea where my modifications of the rxapi code is. It never got checked into svn because it was rejected. Bruce > On May 23, 2017, at 7:36 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > And, of course, as long as we don’t do that, Bruce’s rewrite needs to go in, > just to avoid an avoidable problem. >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] MacOSX plist-file to have rxapi run as a service using launchctl

I think I originally wrote this plist file. In the old make process the ‘make install’ would tailor the file for the current install location (i think). There was some discussion around this file and the rxapi process on MacOS. The problem stems from the MacOS architecture for daemons doesn’t

[Oorexx-devel] oorexx-config

I just pulled down oorexx 5 from svn on a new pi, and checking it out I couldn’t find where oorexx-config was created, or copied for the install. Same thing for the oorexx-config man page. I see the oorexx-config.in and and manpage source. This was a Linux make using the cmake “Unix Files” gen

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Portability

(doc patches, of course, are welcome, too) > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 4:54 PM, CVBruce <mailto:cvbr...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > Another portability issue has popped up. > > I would like to suggest that we provide portability documentation. This > could

[Oorexx-devel] Portability

Hi, Another portability issue has popped up. I would like to suggest that we provide portability documentation. This could be either a separate document, or it could be an appendix or chapter in the ooRexx Reference or other manual. I would see three kinds of portability information being in

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Unix shells

When UNIX was originally released the default shell was /bin/sh, the Bourne Shell written by Stephen Bourne. Make that the only shell. As new shells were written and added to the system, if they were backward compatible, they would end up having /bin/sh linked to them. I would never expect /b

[Oorexx-devel] SnapShot oorexx V5.0.0

Hi, I created ooRexx-5.0.0-0.debian8.7.aarch64.deb from a snapshot I took this morning. This doesn’t appear to be on the sourceforge site. Is anyone interested in posting it. I don’t care either way, just thought I’d offer it up. Bruce signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPG

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Help Compiling mod_rexx

s for httpd-2.4.25. After reading your note I looked at the same > binaries from ApacheLounge that package has a copy of ap_config.h. I'll > install that one and try again. > Thanks! > > On 2017-01-23 22:39, CVBruce wrote: >> On my debian based system the file is in t

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Help Compiling mod_rexx

On my debian based system the file is in the package ‘apache2-dev’ have you installed that package? > On Jan 23, 2017, at 9:39 PM, Terry Fuller wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm trying to compile mod_rexx for httpd 2.4 (the available binaries are > compiled for 2.2) and for 64-bit operation. I'

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Help Compiling mod_rexx

https://ci.apache.org/projects/httpd/trunk/doxygen/ap__config_8h_source.html > On Jan 23, 2017, at 9:39 PM, Terry Fuller wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm trying to compile mod_rexx for httpd 2.4 (the available binaries are > compiled for 2.2) and for 64-bit operation. I'm getting an error > mess

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Seeking a beta of 5.0.0 for MacOSX

Yes. When I made it, macports cmake was at 2.something. Had to install v3 from cmake site. Sent by Magic! > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Rony G. Flatscher > wrote: > >> On 18.01.2017 18:27, CVBruce wrote: >> The only big stumbling block was having the correct version of

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Seeking a beta of 5.0.0 for MacOSX

The only big stumbling block was having the correct version of cmake. Bruce Sent by Magic! > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:18 AM, Rony G. Flatscher > wrote: > > OK, found the compile instructions in > "oorexx/main/trunk/CMake-build-readme.txt". > > ---rny > >> On 18.01.2017 15:31, Rony G. Flatsche

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Creating Ubuntu 16.04 s390x .deb install file

Have you checked that error at the top about rxapi? is rxapi in an appropriate place? Also there should be a rxapid shell script, I think. Bruce > On Dec 16, 2016, at 12:07 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > > Hi, Jack. > > Yes the link is created by the post processing step and isn't in the > archive

Re: [Oorexx-devel] What impact will Microsoft's removal of cmd.exe from Windows 10 have on ooRexx?

Surely that can be addressed by adjustments to the PATH environmental variable. Sent by Magic! > On Dec 7, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Terry Fuller wrote: > > The replacement for cmd.exe is powershell. It's already available in > several releases, alongside cmd.exe. It is, however not backward > com

Re: [Oorexx-devel] What impact will Microsoft's removal of cmd.exe from Windows 10 have on ooRexx?

The article say that going forward, cmd.exe will no longer be distributed. The power shell provides all the functionality that cmd.exe has in the past. This is somewhat like UNIX/Linux which replaced the Bourne Shell (sh) with the Bourne Again Shell (bash) many years ago. Bruce Sent by Magic!

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Can't find ::REQUIRES

Not so much an OS issue as much as a filesystem issue. Both Windows and MacOS have, by default, a case insensitive, case preserving filesystem. On MacOS you can choose a filesystem that is case sensitive. Your point is well taken, that examples/samples should be tested on case sensitive file

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Can't find ::REQUIRES

Interesting. If you move treeDirectory.cls to the same place as the rexx executable (/usr/local/bin ?) is it then able to find it? If you unset $REXX_PATH does it find it? You’ve probably done all this, but I thought I’d ask. Bruce > On Oct 21, 2016, at 2:35 PM, Jack Woehr wrote: > > Built

[Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [RexxLA] ooRexx 5 (Beta) with Rexx/SQL

12:02 PM, Andy McMenemy > <mailto:andy.mcmen...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Thanks Bruce, I'm sure that's the problem. Where can I get the orexx 5 >> includes/libraries? >> Andy >> >> On Wednesday, 24 August 2016, CVBruce > <mailto:cvbr.

[Oorexx-devel] csh

I just noticed that in /usr/local/share/ooRexx there is a rexx.csh file. Could this be the cause of the ‘csh’ requirement? Bruce signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -- _

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New operating system DARWIN

Erich, I agree with René. It is a complicated relationship, but I think Wikipedia is clear: "Darwin is an open-source Unix operating system released by Apple Inc. in 2000. It is composed of code developed by Apple, as well as code derived from NeXTSTEP, BSD, and other free software projects.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] rpm/deb building and install

If you want to really remove it including the left over file, I believe you need to do an "sudo apt-get purge ooRexx” Bruce > On Jul 26, 2016, at 1:21 PM, René Jansen wrote: > > the ooRexx package installed and did the rxapi start-action that was expected. > Removing the package works fine with

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Using a dynamically assigned port number

That's funny, because earlier someone said that it did. Sent by Magic! > On Jul 10, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > > > ooRexx already does not allow Rexx queue communication between different > uids. > > Rick ---

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Using a dynamically assigned port number

I still have concerns about this, and please don't take this as vote against, it isn't. In my last email I specifically mentioned the Windows implementation. I still haven't seen any mention on how we are going to make Windows work the same way as *NIX. We all know the saying Rexx Anywhere,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Using a dynamically assigned port number

I guess I want to understand more of the details. What is the Windows implementation? What are the differences in usage, abilities, and constraints with the current implementation. Sent by Magic! > On Jul 9, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Moritz Hoffmann wrote: > > Going forward, I implemented unix doma

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Using a dynamically assigned port number (Re: Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

ny G. Flatscher <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote: > > On 05.07.2016 22:43, CVBruce wrote: >> Although this gets around the pid file problem, it doesn’t get around the >> port problem, you can still only run one rxapi process per computer. For >> example you can’

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Using a dynamically assigned port number (Re: Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

n 05.07.2016 22:43, CVBruce wrote: >> Although this gets around the pid file problem, it doesn’t get around the >> port problem, you can still only run one rxapi process per computer. For >> example you can’t run both 32bit and 64bit rxapi concurrently on the same >>

Re: [Oorexx-devel] macOS CMake changes

In the installer there is a place that it gives you the option of installing for the current user (~/Applications) or all users (/Applications) > On Jul 5, 2016, at 6:55 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > Hi Jack, > > it has been there for some installers in the past. It requires root, but it > might

Re: [Oorexx-devel] macOS CMake changes

I’ve been wanting to do this for years. Bruce > On Jul 5, 2016, at 5:16 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > With the introduction of El Capitan Apple introduced SIP - System Integrity > Protection, which makes it (without fiddling with NVRAM parameters to disable > it) impossible to write to /usr/bin.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

ote: > > Greetings Bruce, > > CVBruce wrote: >> Moving the PID file will only allow one user to run ooRexx in a shared >> environment. > > > Thank you for clarifying that. Noted. > > I am thankful, > > -- > Michael Lueck >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

Although this gets around the pid file problem, it doesn’t get around the port problem, you can still only run one rxapi process per computer. For example you can’t run both 32bit and 64bit rxapi concurrently on the same box, even if your have different pid files. You can’t run ooRexx V4.2 and

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

That is a symptom. The reason it is set up that way is that communication is via port 10010 (or 10100, I forget which). Only one process can bind that port to accept incoming connections. The PID file is to prevent two processes from binding the ‘ooRexx’ port, thus preventing one process from

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

I don't think that the issue is really the PID file. Rxapi binds a port, and only one process on the computer can bind that port at a time, thus the PID file. All oorexx instances that are using rxapi on that computer, regardless of of process owner, talk to that bound, "well know" port. Sen

Re: [Oorexx-devel] fix broke macOS and wheezy

I think you're right. If I remember correctly it was a system library, maybe even libc. Sent by Magic! > On Jun 29, 2016, at 10:12 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > macOS still broken. I’ll move the Raspbian Wheezy build to a more recent > version of wheezy so we don’t need to look at this when it

[Oorexx-devel] CMake Build Failure on Debian 7

I’m able to build a Debian package on Raspbian/Debian 8 (Jessie), and I think it works, well you do have to fix the install because it requires ‘csh’. When I go to install the package on Raspbian/Debian 7 (Wheezy) it blows up with a bad library, not unexpected. So I’m trying to build on Wheezy

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Builds

Thanks Rick, I'll go read it. Sent by Magic! > On May 7, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > > The instructions are in the file CMake-build-readme.txt > > Rick > >> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 5:58 PM, CVBruce wrote: >> First, apologies to everyone for my l

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Builds

First, apologies to everyone for my last email. I didn’t mean to change the thread and jump into the middle. Just wasn’t thinking. I’ve got the build working just fine, but I can’t figure out how to tell cmake that I want to build a .deb (Debian) package. I can’t find it as a target to build

Re: [Oorexx-devel] build server

I was building ooRexx from the main trunk. I ran into an error. The cmake system did not detect that I didn’t have a curses.h on my system. Although I had libncurses5 installed, I didn’t have the libncurses5-dev package installed. Shouldn’t cmake detect the missing curses.h file? Thanks, B

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad MacOSX El Capitan and creating symbolic links in /usr/* ...

uot;El Capitan"), should I open a bug > report for ooRexx for that particular error on MacOSX? > > ---rony > > > > On 13.03.2016 18:38, CVBruce wrote: >> Later it says: >> "Scripting Languages >> >> Developers using Perl, Python, Ruby,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad MacOSX El Capitan and creating symbolic links in /usr/* ...

Later it says: "Scripting Languages Developers using Perl, Python, Ruby, or any other scripting languages that ship with OS X, are encouraged to manage their own installations of the language and dependencies in /usr/local/. When distributing programs written with a scripting language, develope

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad MacOSX El Capitan and creating symbolic links in /usr/* ...

I just googled “Library SystemMigration History” and got this as the second hit. Where it says: The following directories can only be writte

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need help reading/writing to a "com" port...

CL341, > has a major software error with regards to parity. The software fix is > available in Linux kernel 3.18, but since I am running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, > my kernel is a 3.13.0-77-generic > > - - - > > In particular I would like to give special thanks to "cvbruce&quo

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need help reading/writing to a "com" port...

Enrico. Thanks, I think setserial was the missing link we were looking for. Well at least on Linux. I don’t appear to have a version available on OS X. A useful resource on Serial communications that I’ve referenced over the years is “Serial Programming Guide for POSIX Operating Systems by Sw

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need help reading/writing to a "com" port...

with. socat will take care of things like setting the baud rate. Bruce > On Feb 4, 2016, at 6:39 PM, CVBruce wrote: > > Another thing to try. Make a Loop back tester. RX <-> TX, etc to see if you > can echo characters back and forth to your self. If you can’t talk to your &

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need help reading/writing to a "com" port...

Another thing to try. Make a Loop back tester. RX <-> TX, etc to see if you can echo characters back and forth to your self. If you can’t talk to your self via the test adapter then you know which side of the connection is broken. > On Feb 2, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx to asm.js

Very interesting. Once again a kind of virtual machine ala JVM. Or P-code if you’re that old. I wonder if we will see purpose built microprocessors that use asm.js as their machine code. Bruce > On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:40 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > I was wondering if someone already did find

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx doc and builds

Yes, I think I created the plist file. The issue is that rxapi is not launchd compatible because it forks and execs. The options are that the plist file can just start rxapi at system startup, and hope that it keeps running, or it can set the flag to restart it if it fails. Since the fork and

Re: [Oorexx-devel] building ooRexx 5 on the Raspberry Pi fails - notes

>> On 04 Jun 2015, at 22:36, René Jansen wrote: >> >> That is great, Bruce. My gcc is 4.6.3 and I did and apt-get upgrade this >> afternoon. Did you do anything special to get this higher level gcc? >> >> René >> >> Sent from my iPhone >&

Re: [Oorexx-devel] building ooRexx 5 on the Raspberry Pi fails - notes

de this >> afternoon. Did you do anything special to get this higher level gcc? >> >> René >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 04 Jun 2015, at 22:14, CVBruce wrote: >>> >>> I got it to build on my RPi. I have make 3.0.2 and gcc 4.8.2

Re: [Oorexx-devel] building ooRexx 5 on the Raspberry Pi fails - notes

rade this > afternoon. Did you do anything special to get this higher level gcc? > > René > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 04 Jun 2015, at 22:14, CVBruce wrote: >> >> I got it to build on my RPi. I have make 3.0.2 and gcc 4.8.2 >> >> Bruce >&g

Re: [Oorexx-devel] building ooRexx 5 on the Raspberry Pi fails - notes

I got it to build on my RPi. I have make 3.0.2 and gcc 4.8.2 Bruce Sent by Magic! > On Jun 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > hw: Raspberry Pi 2, 4* ~1Ghz ARM, 3.18 SMP PREEMPT armv71 GNU/Linux > > (1) the installed cmake from the debian repository is 2.8.9 and too low for > ooRexx

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Looking forwards (Social Media) ...

I would like to propose another social media presence, LinkedIn. There are already mainframe, cobol, etc. groups on LinkedIn. I agree with the social media presence. It's not if, you as an individual want to be on a platform, its about product placement. Bruce On Apr 20, 2015, at 12:33 PM, M

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Looking forwards (Social Media) ...

And Twitter. [3] https://twitter.com/ooRexxDev I set this up about three years ago as it is easier to monitor twitter, for announcements or other short communications, than other media. It is light weight to use and you have to reveal very little private information to create an account. It i

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Mirroring ooRexx to github

Ok, then how do the changes get back to the SVN repository on SourceForge? Sent from an undisclosed location. > On Apr 17, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Enrico Sorichetti > wrote: > > If You want people to contribute You will have to make things easier for them > … > the willingness to contribute depends

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Mirroring ooRexx to github

e patches in SVN. Also, most > people do not have access to the SVN repo so they can't create sandboxes to > play with the code while having a backup copy. That can easily be solved with > git. > > Best, > Moritz > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:16 PM CVBruce wrote:

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Mirroring ooRexx to github

I'm not sure what you are suggesting here. To me a mirror site is a copy of the main site, and therefore updates would still have go to the main site. If SourceForge remained as the main site you would still have to use SVN to apply your changes to the source code. If you are talking about mo

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Cmake problem

reation? Bruce On Feb 21, 2015, at 11:23 AM, David Ashley wrote: > Upgrading CMake should fix the problem. The newer GCC should also fix the > linker problem. > > David Ashley > > On 02/21/2015 09:39 AM, CVBruce wrote: >> Thanks Rick. >> >> So the cmake I'

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Cmake problem

gt; > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:23 AM, CVBruce wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to compile ooRexx V5 on Raspbian (Debian Wheezy). Cmake didn't > complete. Here's what I got. > > cmake version 2.8.9 > CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:70 (string): > string does not re

[Oorexx-devel] Cmake problem

Hi, I tried to compile ooRexx V5 on Raspbian (Debian Wheezy). Cmake didn't complete. Here's what I got. cmake version 2.8.9 CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:70 (string): string does not recognize sub-command TIMESTAMP -- Building for a 32-bit architecture -- SVN Revision Number is 10884 CMake

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Bogus dependency error for Build 10881 x86_64 and OpenSuSE 13.1

Does your package manager think that csh is installed? Bruce On Jan 30, 2015, at 11:47 AM, J. Leslie Turriff wrote: > I just tried to install the newest build on my OpenSuSE system, and > got this > error, even though csh is installed: > > 13:43:41,root@pinto > ~ > #rpm -Uf > ~leslie/D

Re: [Oorexx-devel] 200**4

I thought that we already beat this one to death. If you preface your expression with "NUMERIC DIGITS 20" you will see that the answers are the same. After each math operation rounding is performed. So in repeated multiplication rounding is performed P times, while in the case of the power op

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Mac Users/Developers

Yes, I can help a bit. Bruce On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:53 PM, David Ashley wrote: > I may be able to obtain an older Mac Mini (the one just older than the > just introduced version). Would someone who has experience building > ooRexx on a Mac be willing to help me set up my new machine so that I > can

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge

does have some missing build files due to some not under our control, > but that is the only platform that is specific in that way. > > David Ashley > > On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 12:27 -0700, CVBruce wrote: >> No, it is only for linux. It does not contain the platform specific

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge

No, it is only for linux. It does not contain the platform specific files for AIX or OSX. Bruce On Sep 22, 2014, at 12:20 PM, David Ashley wrote: > The tar.gz file is for all *nix platforms. > > David Ashley > > On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:13 -0700, CVBruce wrote: >> And so

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge

files. We do this so that you don't get files you do not need to > build ooRexx on your platform. > > David Ashley > > On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:06 -0700, CVBruce wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I may not understand what this source file, ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz, is

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge

e do this so that you don't get files you do not need to > build ooRexx on your platform. > > David Ashley > > On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:06 -0700, CVBruce wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I may not understand what this source file, ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz, is >>

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge

Hi, I may not understand what this source file, ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz, is supposed to contain, but I would expect it to contain all the source required to build ooRexx on any platform. When I compare the contents of this file with the SVN main/releases/4.2.0/trunk it is clear that the onl

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Future CPU Architecture Decisions

On Jun 9, 2014, at 10:50 AM, David Ashley wrote: > The bottom line is that any library or application that is 32 bit only > would not be usable in a 64 bit operating system. ^--- Windows Right now I have 135 processes running of which 24 are 32bit X

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Web Site Download Page

I've seen some sites where just the current release is listed, an at the bottom is a link to an "older releases" page. People usually want the current release, unless they have a very specific reason to get something else. Bruce On Mar 11, 2014, at 8:37 AM, David Ashley wrote: > All - > > The

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Update SF Summary tab

are Windows, Linux, Mac/OS, and > Solaris. So, the real question is which of the different flavors should we > mark as the default download for Linux? Likely none of them are correct for > most people. > > Rick > > >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:30 PM, CVBruce wrote

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Update SF Summary tab

wrote: > > Greetings Bruce, > > CVBruce wrote: >> Are you talking about the green button for download. That's the only place >> I see a version number stated, and that depends on the OS that you're using. > > > Yes, I believe we are describing the same thing. >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Update SF Summary tab

Are you talking about the green button for download. That's the only place I see a version number stated, and that depends on the OS that you're using. Bruce On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Michael Lueck wrote: > Greetings, > > The front page / summary tab of the SF ooRexx project still suggests

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ubuntu 13.10 ooRexx Builds Available and Old Problem Fixed (maybe)

David, This is great. Thanks. You applied this to the main trunk, I assume. Bruce On Nov 11, 2013, at 6:24 AM, David Ashley wrote: > All - > > I created VMs for Ubuntu 13.10 32 and 64 bit ooRexx builds yesterday. > Daily builds are available starting today. > > Now for the longer story. I thin

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooDialog - Have I deletedsomethingIshouldn'thave?

Rick, Thanks! I'm saving this in evernote for future reference. Bruce On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > I just fixed this. Below is my command line session for doing this. The > steps were: > > 1) issue an "svn info" from the directory I wish to back out from. This > giv

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any progress on non-root perms an ooRexx 4.x?

For example, you are using a commercial web hosting company, which will not install any software that is not on their list of supported software, and you have some Rexx cgi scripts you want to use. On Apr 20, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > - Another use case are "portable apps" o

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any progress on non-root perms an ooRexx 4.x?

That's the issue. The user doesn't have root authority. Not to install or use ooRexx. Sent from an undisclosed location. On Apr 19, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Manfred Lotz wrote: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:34:31 -0700 > CVBruce wrote: > >> Well except you need root authori

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any progress on non-root perms an ooRexx 4.x?

Well except you need root authority to create user lightdm and the directory in /var/run. Bruce On Apr 19, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Manfred Lotz wrote: > Hi Rony, > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:50:51 +0200 > "Rony G. Flatscher" wrote: > >> On 19.04.2013 00:32, René Jansen wrote: >>> Any port above 1024

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any progress on non-root perms an ooRexx 4.x?

I may be wrong, but I thought that root was only required if the port was below a certain number, perhaps 1000. Anything over this number could be opened by ordinary users. Did I remember this incorrectly, or has this changed. Bruce Sent from an undisclosed location. On Apr 18, 2013, at 2:15

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Intercepting kill command

I agree with you. SIGHUP, is still under the users control. If they want the program to continue processing after a SIGHUP, they can always start the program with the "nohup" command. I think that this would be the expected behavior. Bruce Sent from an undisclosed location. On Nov 9, 2012,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Publican Docs Promoted (Moved)

Congratulations to everyone that worked on this. It was a fairly large task, and I think you guys did a great job. Many thanks to all of you. Bruce On Oct 16, 2012, at 8:54 AM, David Ashley wrote: > All - > > The Publican docs are now the main docs under the trunk subdirectory. > The old DSSS

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx scripts with IBM'as HTTPD server

I have done very little CGI, but my impression is that the CGI program basically is launched by the web server with the client request setup as input, and anything that is written to standard output goes back to apache, and is sent along to the client. So I would think you could. People have

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Getting Started Document

+1 On Sep 17, 2012, at 12:40 PM, David Ashley wrote: > All - > > After much deliberation on my part I believe that we need a new major > document that, for lack of a better title, I am calling "Getting > Started". I would like for this to be a complete tutloial of getting and > using ooRexx for t

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Namine Conventions

> >> David Ashley >> >> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 14:15 -0700, CVBruce wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It looks like installer packages are now using a naming convention of >>> x86_32 an

[Oorexx-devel] Namine Conventions

Hi, It looks like installer packages are now using a naming convention of x86_32 and x86_64, instead of i586. Should I change them to the what appears to be the new format? Bruce -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exc

[Oorexx-devel] Source Forge Open Object Rexx Page.

Normally on Source Forge when you go to a project page, there is a green button to download the latest release for your particular machine. On the Open Object Rexx page for me it shows 'ooRexx-4.1.0-all.zip' which I believe is the documentation file for version 4.1.0. Do we have any control o

[Oorexx-devel] Mac OS X binary

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1426853/ooRexx-4.1.2-i586.dmg Bruce -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can resp

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx V4.1.2

s not using CPU and appears to be waiting for a connect to the rxapi server to time out. Of course rxapi isn't running. Bruce On Aug 27, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:38 PM, CVBruce wrote: >> Has anybody been able to create a binary for ooRexx

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx V4.1.2

Has anybody been able to create a binary for ooRexx V4.1.2 for Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard)? I have not been able to get a reasonable binary to create. Thanks, Bruce -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event w

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Man Pages

x27;t find its libraries. You know just general stuff that the first time user wouldn't know. Bruce On Aug 25, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM, CVBruce wrote: >> Would it not make sense to either create a man page for ooRexx, or to creat

[Oorexx-devel] Man Pages

Would it not make sense to either create a man page for ooRexx, or to create a link to the existing rexx man page. After the installer package says ooRexx, not rexx. Bruce -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive l

  1   2   3   >