Re: [Oorexx-devel] Creating USB stick versions

In some companies, the security on company computers is such that reading, writing, and executing or even mounting usb drives is blocked. Have your former students tried to execute programs from USB drives? Also, there are several different environments for deploying “portable apps”. Since we

Re: [Oorexx-devel] open() option APPEND

Eric, To your point #2. In looking at other implementations of Rexx, I found that some implementations note that if you move the write pointer to someplace in the existing file, and then write, the file will be truncated to that written data. This led me to the realization that the write

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5 installer for Mac OS

I’ve been thinking about this for a while. In my opinion, for Mac OS, I don’t know that we need an ‘installer'. I generally download and compile ooRexx. ooRexx, at least on Mac OS doesn’t require a GUI. There is no ooDialog for Mac OS. Also, at least for Mac Ports, the build script can put

Re: [Oorexx-devel] oosqlite.so

Just guessing, but I would think that the liboosqlite.so would be in /usr/lib, not /usr/bin. Bruce > On Nov 13, 2020, at 3:41 PM, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > > I'll admit that I am confused at the moment. > > I downloaded oosqlite for LINUX from sourceforge.net ooREXX > > followed the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] R5 linein/lineout DRAMATIC slowdown???

Were the both fresh compiles, with the same compiler and build environment and optimization options? Something has obviously changed. > On Sep 26, 2020, at 12:32 AM, WalterPachl wrote: > > What am I doing wrong? > > R5beta takes about 25 times the elapsed time of R4.2 > > /* > E:\>rexx tio >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Jenkins

I believe that RPi2 is 32bit. You will need either an RPi3 or RPi4 for 64 bit. You will also need to download a beta version of Raspberry Pi OS that is 64 bit. Until the recently released RPi4 8GB, all versions of Raspberry Pi OS were 32 bit. This simplified their software distribution,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Performance

That sounds about right 90% of one cpu is 22.5% In my experiments on a 4 core raspberry pi, I could drive 3 cores to 95%+ and the last core to about 75%. Jim could try running 4 concurrent copies of his program to verify this. Another issue, is that if you drive the cpu so hard that it

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [oorexx:bugs] Re: #1475 ooRexx (r11290) doesn't exit cleanly on macOS

I just did a SVN update (11290), cmake, and make. It exits cleanly here. Mac OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite. Compiler: Apple LLVM version 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.53) (based on LLVM 3.6.0svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.5.0 Thread model: posix Bruce > On Aug 24, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Erich Steinböck

Re: [Oorexx-devel] MacOSX plist-file to have rxapi run as a service using launchctl

ke them available! It is quite disturbing that on MacOSX the > launcher tries to restart the running rxapi daemon every ten seconds in vain > (for stability reasons "keepalive" needs to be set IMHO). > ---rony > > > On 23.05.2017 16:14, CVBruce wrote: >> I th

Re: [Oorexx-devel] MacOSX plist-file to have rxapi run as a service using launchctl

No, I sent is to Mark. Remember this is probably at least 5 years ago. Bruce > On May 23, 2017, at 7:53 AM, René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > did you post it to the list? > > René. > >> On 23 May 2017, at 16:42, CVBruce <cvbr...@gmail.com> w

Re: [Oorexx-devel] MacOSX plist-file to have rxapi run as a service using launchctl

I have no idea where my modifications of the rxapi code is. It never got checked into svn because it was rejected. Bruce > On May 23, 2017, at 7:36 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > And, of course, as long as we don’t do that, Bruce’s rewrite needs to go in, > just to avoid an

Re: [Oorexx-devel] MacOSX plist-file to have rxapi run as a service using launchctl

I think I originally wrote this plist file. In the old make process the ‘make install’ would tailor the file for the current install location (i think). There was some discussion around this file and the rxapi process on MacOS. The problem stems from the MacOS architecture for daemons doesn’t

[Oorexx-devel] oorexx-config

I just pulled down oorexx 5 from svn on a new pi, and checking it out I couldn’t find where oorexx-config was created, or copied for the install. Same thing for the oorexx-config man page. I see the oorexx-config.in and and manpage source. This was a Linux make using the cmake “Unix Files”

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Portability

xpg as > appropriate. > > (doc patches, of course, are welcome, too) > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 4:54 PM, CVBruce <cvbr...@gmail.com > <mailto:cvbr...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > Another portability issue has popped up. > > I would like to suggest t

[Oorexx-devel] Portability

Hi, Another portability issue has popped up. I would like to suggest that we provide portability documentation. This could be either a separate document, or it could be an appendix or chapter in the ooRexx Reference or other manual. I would see three kinds of portability information being

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Unix shells

When UNIX was originally released the default shell was /bin/sh, the Bourne Shell written by Stephen Bourne. Make that the only shell. As new shells were written and added to the system, if they were backward compatible, they would end up having /bin/sh linked to them. I would never expect

[Oorexx-devel] SnapShot oorexx V5.0.0

Hi, I created ooRexx-5.0.0-0.debian8.7.aarch64.deb from a snapshot I took this morning. This doesn’t appear to be on the sourceforge site. Is anyone interested in posting it. I don’t care either way, just thought I’d offer it up. Bruce signature.asc Description: Message signed with

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Help Compiling mod_rexx

gt; Haus for httpd-2.4.25. After reading your note I looked at the same > binaries from ApacheLounge that package has a copy of ap_config.h. I'll > install that one and try again. > Thanks! > > On 2017-01-23 22:39, CVBruce wrote: >> On my debian based system the file is

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Help Compiling mod_rexx

On my debian based system the file is in the package ‘apache2-dev’ have you installed that package? > On Jan 23, 2017, at 9:39 PM, Terry Fuller wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm trying to compile mod_rexx for httpd 2.4 (the available binaries are > compiled for 2.2) and for

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Help Compiling mod_rexx

https://ci.apache.org/projects/httpd/trunk/doxygen/ap__config_8h_source.html > On Jan 23, 2017, at 9:39 PM, Terry Fuller wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm trying to compile mod_rexx for httpd 2.4 (the available binaries are > compiled for 2.2) and for 64-bit operation. I'm

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Seeking a beta of 5.0.0 for MacOSX

Yes. When I made it, macports cmake was at 2.something. Had to install v3 from cmake site. Sent by Magic! > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at> > wrote: > >> On 18.01.2017 18:27, CVBruce wrote: >> The only big stumbling block was

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Seeking a beta of 5.0.0 for MacOSX

The only big stumbling block was having the correct version of cmake. Bruce Sent by Magic! > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:18 AM, Rony G. Flatscher > wrote: > > OK, found the compile instructions in > "oorexx/main/trunk/CMake-build-readme.txt". > > ---rny > >> On

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Creating Ubuntu 16.04 s390x .deb install file

Have you checked that error at the top about rxapi? is rxapi in an appropriate place? Also there should be a rxapid shell script, I think. Bruce > On Dec 16, 2016, at 12:07 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > > Hi, Jack. > > Yes the link is created by the post processing step

Re: [Oorexx-devel] What impact will Microsoft's removal of cmd.exe from Windows 10 have on ooRexx?

Surely that can be addressed by adjustments to the PATH environmental variable. Sent by Magic! > On Dec 7, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Terry Fuller wrote: > > The replacement for cmd.exe is powershell. It's already available in > several releases, alongside cmd.exe. It is, however

Re: [Oorexx-devel] What impact will Microsoft's removal of cmd.exe from Windows 10 have on ooRexx?

The article say that going forward, cmd.exe will no longer be distributed. The power shell provides all the functionality that cmd.exe has in the past. This is somewhat like UNIX/Linux which replaced the Bourne Shell (sh) with the Bourne Again Shell (bash) many years ago. Bruce Sent by

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Can't find ::REQUIRES

Not so much an OS issue as much as a filesystem issue. Both Windows and MacOS have, by default, a case insensitive, case preserving filesystem. On MacOS you can choose a filesystem that is case sensitive. Your point is well taken, that examples/samples should be tested on case sensitive file

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Can't find ::REQUIRES

Interesting. If you move treeDirectory.cls to the same place as the rexx executable (/usr/local/bin ?) is it then able to find it? If you unset $REXX_PATH does it find it? You’ve probably done all this, but I thought I’d ask. Bruce > On Oct 21, 2016, at 2:35 PM, Jack Woehr

[Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [RexxLA] ooRexx 5 (Beta) with Rexx/SQL

e need to make sure that the installer is installing the > necessary files. I will send you a copy offline. > > Bruce > >> On Aug 24, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Andy McMenemy <andy.mcmen...@gmail.com >> <mailto:andy.mcmen...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>

[Oorexx-devel] csh

I just noticed that in /usr/local/share/ooRexx there is a rexx.csh file. Could this be the cause of the ‘csh’ requirement? Bruce signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New operating system DARWIN

Erich, I agree with René. It is a complicated relationship, but I think Wikipedia is clear: "Darwin is an open-source Unix operating system released by Apple Inc. in 2000. It is composed of code developed by Apple, as well as code derived from NeXTSTEP, BSD, and other free software projects.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] rpm/deb building and install

If you want to really remove it including the left over file, I believe you need to do an "sudo apt-get purge ooRexx” Bruce > On Jul 26, 2016, at 1:21 PM, René Jansen wrote: > > the ooRexx package installed and did the rxapi start-action that was expected. > Removing the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Using a dynamically assigned port number

That's funny, because earlier someone said that it did. Sent by Magic! > On Jul 10, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > > > ooRexx already does not allow Rexx queue communication between different > uids. > > Rick

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Using a dynamically assigned port number

I still have concerns about this, and please don't take this as vote against, it isn't. In my last email I specifically mentioned the Windows implementation. I still haven't seen any mention on how we are going to make Windows work the same way as *NIX. We all know the saying Rexx Anywhere,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Using a dynamically assigned port number

I guess I want to understand more of the details. What is the Windows implementation? What are the differences in usage, abilities, and constraints with the current implementation. Sent by Magic! > On Jul 9, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Moritz Hoffmann wrote: > > Going forward, I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Using a dynamically assigned port number (Re: Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

ul 6, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at > <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote: > > On 05.07.2016 22:43, CVBruce wrote: >> Although this gets around the pid file problem, it doesn’t get around the >> port problem, you can still only ru

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Using a dynamically assigned port number (Re: Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

.ac.at> wrote: > > > On 05.07.2016 22:43, CVBruce wrote: >> Although this gets around the pid file problem, it doesn’t get around the >> port problem, you can still only run one rxapi process per computer. For >> example you can’t run both 32bit and 64bit rxapi co

Re: [Oorexx-devel] macOS CMake changes

In the installer there is a place that it gives you the option of installing for the current user (~/Applications) or all users (/Applications) > On Jul 5, 2016, at 6:55 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > Hi Jack, > > it has been there for some installers in the past. It requires

Re: [Oorexx-devel] macOS CMake changes

I’ve been wanting to do this for years. Bruce > On Jul 5, 2016, at 5:16 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > With the introduction of El Capitan Apple introduced SIP - System Integrity > Protection, which makes it (without fiddling with NVRAM parameters to disable > it) impossible

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

lt;mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com> wrote: > > Greetings Bruce, > > CVBruce wrote: >> Moving the PID file will only allow one user to run ooRexx in a shared >> environment. > > > Thank you for clarifying that. Noted. > > I am thankful, > > -- > Michael Lue

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

Although this gets around the pid file problem, it doesn’t get around the port problem, you can still only run one rxapi process per computer. For example you can’t run both 32bit and 64bit rxapi concurrently on the same box, even if your have different pid files. You can’t run ooRexx V4.2

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

That is a symptom. The reason it is set up that way is that communication is via port 10010 (or 10100, I forget which). Only one process can bind that port to accept incoming connections. The PID file is to prevent two processes from binding the ‘ooRexx’ port, thus preventing one process

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running ooRexx without superuser power ... (Re: ooRexxUnit return codes

I don't think that the issue is really the PID file. Rxapi binds a port, and only one process on the computer can bind that port at a time, thus the PID file. All oorexx instances that are using rxapi on that computer, regardless of of process owner, talk to that bound, "well know" port.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] fix broke macOS and wheezy

I think you're right. If I remember correctly it was a system library, maybe even libc. Sent by Magic! > On Jun 29, 2016, at 10:12 AM, René Jansen wrote: > > macOS still broken. I’ll move the Raspbian Wheezy build to a more recent > version of wheezy so we don’t need to

[Oorexx-devel] CMake Build Failure on Debian 7

I’m able to build a Debian package on Raspbian/Debian 8 (Jessie), and I think it works, well you do have to fix the install because it requires ‘csh’. When I go to install the package on Raspbian/Debian 7 (Wheezy) it blows up with a bad library, not unexpected. So I’m trying to build on

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Builds

Thanks Rick, I'll go read it. Sent by Magic! > On May 7, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The instructions are in the file CMake-build-readme.txt > > Rick > >> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 5:58 PM, CVBruce <cvbr...@gmail.com> wr

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Builds

First, apologies to everyone for my last email. I didn’t mean to change the thread and jump into the middle. Just wasn’t thinking. I’ve got the build working just fine, but I can’t figure out how to tell cmake that I want to build a .deb (Debian) package. I can’t find it as a target to

Re: [Oorexx-devel] build server

I was building ooRexx from the main trunk. I ran into an error. The cmake system did not detect that I didn’t have a curses.h on my system. Although I had libncurses5 installed, I didn’t have the libncurses5-dev package installed. Shouldn’t cmake detect the missing curses.h file? Thanks,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad MacOSX El Capitan and creating symbolic links in /usr/* ...

ting with 10.11, "El Capitan"), should I open a bug > report for ooRexx for that particular error on MacOSX? > > ---rony > > > > On 13.03.2016 18:38, CVBruce wrote: >> Later it says: >> "Scripting Languages >> >> Developers using Perl, Pyt

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad MacOSX El Capitan and creating symbolic links in /usr/* ...

Later it says: "Scripting Languages Developers using Perl, Python, Ruby, or any other scripting languages that ship with OS X, are encouraged to manage their own installations of the language and dependencies in /usr/local/. When distributing programs written with a scripting language,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad MacOSX El Capitan and creating symbolic links in /usr/* ...

I just googled “Library SystemMigration History” and got this as the second hit. Where it says: The following directories can only be

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need help reading/writing to a "com" port...

d that the driver CL341, > has a major software error with regards to parity. The software fix is > available in Linux kernel 3.18, but since I am running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, > my kernel is a 3.13.0-77-generic > > - - - > > In particular I would like to give special thanks to

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need help reading/writing to a "com" port...

Enrico. Thanks, I think setserial was the missing link we were looking for. Well at least on Linux. I don’t appear to have a version available on OS X. A useful resource on Serial communications that I’ve referenced over the years is “Serial Programming Guide for POSIX Operating Systems by

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need help reading/writing to a "com" port...

with. socat will take care of things like setting the baud rate. Bruce > On Feb 4, 2016, at 6:39 PM, CVBruce <cvbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Another thing to try. Make a Loop back tester. RX <-> TX, etc to see if you > can echo characters back and forth to your self. I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx to asm.js

Very interesting. Once again a kind of virtual machine ala JVM. Or P-code if you’re that old. I wonder if we will see purpose built microprocessors that use asm.js as their machine code. Bruce On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:40 AM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote: I was wondering if someone

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx doc and builds

Yes, I think I created the plist file. The issue is that rxapi is not launchd compatible because it forks and execs. The options are that the plist file can just start rxapi at system startup, and hope that it keeps running, or it can set the flag to restart it if it fails. Since the fork

Re: [Oorexx-devel] building ooRexx 5 on the Raspberry Pi fails - notes

iPhone On 04 Jun 2015, at 22:14, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote: I got it to build on my RPi. I have make 3.0.2 and gcc 4.8.2 Bruce Sent by Magic! On Jun 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote: hw: Raspberry Pi 2, 4* ~1Ghz ARM, 3.18 SMP PREEMPT armv71 GNU/Linux

Re: [Oorexx-devel] building ooRexx 5 on the Raspberry Pi fails - notes

upgrade this afternoon. Did you do anything special to get this higher level gcc? René Sent from my iPhone On 04 Jun 2015, at 22:14, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote: I got it to build on my RPi. I have make 3.0.2 and gcc 4.8.2 Bruce Sent by Magic! On Jun 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM

Re: [Oorexx-devel] building ooRexx 5 on the Raspberry Pi fails - notes

gcc is 4.6.3 and I did and apt-get upgrade this afternoon. Did you do anything special to get this higher level gcc? René Sent from my iPhone On 04 Jun 2015, at 22:14, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote: I got it to build on my RPi. I have make 3.0.2 and gcc 4.8.2 Bruce Sent

[Oorexx-devel] Cmake problem

Hi, I tried to compile ooRexx V5 on Raspbian (Debian Wheezy). Cmake didn't complete. Here's what I got. cmake version 2.8.9 CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:70 (string): string does not recognize sub-command TIMESTAMP -- Building for a 32-bit architecture -- SVN Revision Number is 10884

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Bogus dependency error for Build 10881 x86_64 and OpenSuSE 13.1

Does your package manager think that csh is installed? Bruce On Jan 30, 2015, at 11:47 AM, J. Leslie Turriff wrote: I just tried to install the newest build on my OpenSuSE system, and got this error, even though csh is installed: 13:43:41,root@pinto ~ #rpm -Uf

Re: [Oorexx-devel] 200**4

I thought that we already beat this one to death. If you preface your expression with NUMERIC DIGITS 20 you will see that the answers are the same. After each math operation rounding is performed. So in repeated multiplication rounding is performed P times, while in the case of the power

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Mac Users/Developers

Yes, I can help a bit. Bruce On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:53 PM, David Ashley wrote: I may be able to obtain an older Mac Mini (the one just older than the just introduced version). Would someone who has experience building ooRexx on a Mac be willing to help me set up my new machine so that I can

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge

that you don't get files you do not need to build ooRexx on your platform. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:06 -0700, CVBruce wrote: Hi, I may not understand what this source file, ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz, is supposed to contain, but I would expect it to contain all the source

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge

that you don't get files you do not need to build ooRexx on your platform. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:06 -0700, CVBruce wrote: Hi, I may not understand what this source file, ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz, is supposed to contain, but I would expect it to contain all the source

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge

No, it is only for linux. It does not contain the platform specific files for AIX or OSX. Bruce On Sep 22, 2014, at 12:20 PM, David Ashley wrote: The tar.gz file is for all *nix platforms. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:13 -0700, CVBruce wrote: And so if you want to build AIX

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx-4.2.0-source.tar.gz file on SourceForge

that is specific in that way. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 12:27 -0700, CVBruce wrote: No, it is only for linux. It does not contain the platform specific files for AIX or OSX. Bruce On Sep 22, 2014, at 12:20 PM, David Ashley wrote: The tar.gz file is for all *nix platforms

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Update SF Summary tab

Are you talking about the green button for download. That's the only place I see a version number stated, and that depends on the OS that you're using. Bruce On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Michael Lueck wrote: Greetings, The front page / summary tab of the SF ooRexx project still suggests to

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Update SF Summary tab

...@lueckdatasystems.com wrote: Greetings Bruce, CVBruce wrote: Are you talking about the green button for download. That's the only place I see a version number stated, and that depends on the OS that you're using. Yes, I believe we are describing the same thing. It does correctly sense I am

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Update SF Summary tab

systems are Windows, Linux, Mac/OS, and Solaris. So, the real question is which of the different flavors should we mark as the default download for Linux? Likely none of them are correct for most people. Rick On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:30 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote: What package

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ubuntu 13.10 ooRexx Builds Available and Old Problem Fixed (maybe)

David, This is great. Thanks. You applied this to the main trunk, I assume. Bruce On Nov 11, 2013, at 6:24 AM, David Ashley wrote: All - I created VMs for Ubuntu 13.10 32 and 64 bit ooRexx builds yesterday. Daily builds are available starting today. Now for the longer story. I think I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooDialog - Have I deletedsomethingIshouldn'thave?

Rick, Thanks! I'm saving this in evernote for future reference. Bruce On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: I just fixed this. Below is my command line session for doing this. The steps were: 1) issue an svn info from the directory I wish to back out from. This gives me

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any progress on non-root perms an ooRexx 4.x?

For example, you are using a commercial web hosting company, which will not install any software that is not on their list of supported software, and you have some Rexx cgi scripts you want to use. On Apr 20, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: - Another use case are portable apps on

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any progress on non-root perms an ooRexx 4.x?

Well except you need root authority to create user lightdm and the directory in /var/run. Bruce On Apr 19, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Manfred Lotz wrote: Hi Rony, On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:50:51 +0200 Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at wrote: On 19.04.2013 00:32, René Jansen wrote: Any

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Any progress on non-root perms an ooRexx 4.x?

I may be wrong, but I thought that root was only required if the port was below a certain number, perhaps 1000. Anything over this number could be opened by ordinary users. Did I remember this incorrectly, or has this changed. Bruce Sent from an undisclosed location. On Apr 18, 2013, at

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Intercepting kill command

I agree with you. SIGHUP, is still under the users control. If they want the program to continue processing after a SIGHUP, they can always start the program with the nohup command. I think that this would be the expected behavior. Bruce Sent from an undisclosed location. On Nov 9, 2012,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Publican Docs Promoted (Moved)

Congratulations to everyone that worked on this. It was a fairly large task, and I think you guys did a great job. Many thanks to all of you. Bruce On Oct 16, 2012, at 8:54 AM, David Ashley wrote: All - The Publican docs are now the main docs under the trunk subdirectory. The old DSSSL

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx scripts with IBM'as HTTPD server

I have done very little CGI, but my impression is that the CGI program basically is launched by the web server with the client request setup as input, and anything that is written to standard output goes back to apache, and is sent along to the client. So I would think you could. People have

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Namine Conventions

, 2012-09-11 at 14:15 -0700, CVBruce wrote: Hi, It looks like installer packages are now using a naming convention of x86_32 and x86_64, instead of i586. Should I change them to the what appears to be the new format? Bruce

[Oorexx-devel] Source Forge Open Object Rexx Page.

Normally on Source Forge when you go to a project page, there is a green button to download the latest release for your particular machine. On the Open Object Rexx page for me it shows 'ooRexx-4.1.0-all.zip' which I believe is the documentation file for version 4.1.0. Do we have any control

[Oorexx-devel] Mac OS X binary

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1426853/ooRexx-4.1.2-i586.dmg Bruce -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx V4.1.2

Has anybody been able to create a binary for ooRexx V4.1.2 for Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard)? I have not been able to get a reasonable binary to create. Thanks, Bruce -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Man Pages

find its libraries. You know just general stuff that the first time user wouldn't know. Bruce On Aug 25, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote: Would it not make sense to either create a man page for ooRexx, or to create

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.1.2 Rev 8193

The usual. Build Environment Mac OS X 10.7.4 (Lion) ooTest Framework - Automated Test of the ooRexx Interpreter Interpreter: REXX-ooRexx_4.1.2(MT) 6.03 14 Aug 2012 Addressing Mode: 64 ooRexxUnit: 2.0.0_3.2.0ooTest: 1.0.0_4.1.2 Tests ran: 18297 Assertions: 573435

[Oorexx-devel] XALAN ooRexx V4.1.2

Hi, I got a warning when I ran ./configure: checking for Xalan... no checking for xalan... no configure: WARNING: cannot find xalan, Xalan First, do I need it? Secondly, I found a couple of packages that might be close: XSLT processor in c++ for transforming XML Apache Xerces 2 Java XML

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Thinking about a next release ... 4.1.2

René, My fault. I'll try to get on board with 4.1.2. Bruce Skelly On Aug 3, 2012, at 8:15 AM, rvjansen wrote: Mark, I think that is a very good idea. We also should try to have the packages for the different platforms built and available on the same date. I was wondering why the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad bug-e-mails ...

I started getting duplicates recently. I thought my wife had a word with SourceForge, to let them know that I don't really listen, and you have to repeat everything twice. Bruce On Jun 12, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: I did get it, but I only got 1 copy. I usually get 2 copies

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Try building ooSQLite on Mac ?

I'll give it a go. Bruce On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: Hi Jean-Louis, Bruce, Rony ... If anyone has some time to try building ooSQLite on a Mac, that would be cool. grin https://oorexx.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/oorexx/incubator/ooSQLite If someone tries it,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] oorexx on z/os

DJ, I think he isn't that far yet. He is running the configure script, which is failing. So he doesn't have even a makefile yet. Bruce On May 10, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Dave Jones wrote: Hi, Earl. Have you tried running just the C+ pre-processor step on another platform like gcc on Intel?

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Bad link in Chapter 1 of ooDialog Ref and oodGuide

I would think that you would need software that has registered to handle that kind of URI. Does the URI work if you type it in the address field of your browser. On my computer it opened Mozila Thunderbird, which then wanted me to configure its news group feeds. Just like the callto: you

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Bad link in Chapter 1 of ooDialog Ref andoodGuide

I thought about using the link to google, but didn't want to suggest it because not everyone reads usenet news on google. I have to admit though, my ISP has dropped support for usenet news groups. Bruce On Apr 1, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Oliver

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Is it possible to customize the main sourceforge project page?

Black, with Green text, of course. Sounds about right to me. 8-) Bruce On Mar 13, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: Maybe we could get Les to do it? ;-) Hmm, I foresee a webpage with five 4-word lines of (3270 font) characters :-) Come to think of it, I think I have

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Missing built-in functions in ooRexx

CEIL determines the smallest integer value greater than or equal to x, and assigns this value to the result. FLOOR returns the largest integer value less than or equal to x. BOOL returns a bit string that is the result of the Boolean operation z, on x and y. The length of the result is equal

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Missing built-in functions in ooRexx

Have you looked at the BITAND BITOR, and BITXOR builtin functions? Bruce On Mar 13, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Sanford Geiger wrote: Ok. How can I download the math package. Bool is a Boolean function (i.e. ANDing or ORing using a bit mask). Your Floor and Ceil routines are fine. I should have

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Missing built-in functions in ooRexx

must have overlooked them and you are right about CEIL. From: CVBruce [mailto:cvbr...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 7:17 PM To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Missing built-in functions in ooRexx Have you looked at the BITAND BITOR

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Missing built-in functions in ooRexx

separately. I do need the Floor function, but I may not need Ceil. I do thank you all for your time. From: CVBruce [mailto:cvbr...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 7:38 PM To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Missing built-in functions in ooRexx

[Oorexx-devel] Interesting Problem

Hi, I don't know if this is a bug or programmer error. It is an unexpected result for me. When I use the statement SAY I:X I expected the same results as when I use the statement SAY I:L but ooRexx thinks I'm trying to use a hex number. Am I not using Rexx correctly? Bruce

[Oorexx-devel] Where things go

Hi, When I built 4.2 out of the main trunk, the libraries went into /usr/lib on my mac. When I built 4.1.1 then went into /usr/lib/ooRexx. Is there an argument I can give to configure to cause the libraries to populate as in 4.2 rather than 4.1.1? Thanks, Bruce

[Oorexx-devel] SysFileTree

I thought I would play around with SysFileTree some more. Mark asked me to debug this, and I will need help doing that. Perhaps someone with gdb skills can give me some help. In any case, I ran this program this morning. #!/usr/bin/rexx Call SysFileTree Users/bjskelly/b*, F; Say The

Re: [Oorexx-devel] SysFileTree

directory, the second is an absolute location. Rick On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:10 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote: I thought I would play around with SysFileTree some more. Mark asked me to debug this, and I will need help doing that. Perhaps someone with gdb skills can give me some

Re: [Oorexx-devel] main trunk build

I'll give it a shot. Bruce On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:28 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote: I just wanted to thank whoever has been working on the 4.2.0 build. I just built 32 and 64 bit versions on Mac OS X 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard

  1   2   3   >