Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

I'm sorry if I missed the answer to this question, but why don't you just re-compile rexxsql? I have a 64bit version working on my machine (Mac OSX). In the long run aren't you going to want to upgrade to 64bit anyway? Bruce Sent from an undisclosed location. On Nov 25, 2011, at 7:10 AM, rvj

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

Bill, as I am somewhat allergic to installers I always build my own Rexxen and I find that getting this process to work pays off at a favorable rate; if you define the box as 'developer machine' at install chances are that you need nothing extra; then it is ./bootstrap ; ./configure ; sudo mak

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

Bill, On 25.11.2011 01:23, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > (By the way, the 64-bit version installs very quickly and without any > hassle - > If it weren't for the incompatibility between REXXSQL, > and REXX 4.1 64-bit I wouldn't have had any trouble) If you used JDBC, you could stick to 6

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > Ok, I think I now have the 32 bit version installed. > > How can I tell and be sure? Just run rexx -v from the command line and the output will tell you. (This is Windows of course, but the output will be the same on Linux) C:\work.o

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

Mark, Ok, I think I now have the 32 bit version installed. How can I tell and be sure? There is nothing in the "version" output that identifies 32-bit vs 64-bit that I can see. (By the way, the 64-bit version installs very quickly and without any hassle - If it weren't for the incompatibilit

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

Hi Bill, On the face of it, I wouldn't think this would be that difficult to do. Install 32-bit ooRexx on 64-bit Ubuntu that is. However, I don't have a 64-bit Ubuntu system handy, so I can't walk through it and see exactly what does need to be done. Maybe this weekend I might try it. See belo

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

I've just about reached the limit on my patience... My Linux system is a 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04, and that may be part of the problem. I am not an expert Linux user/programmer and so have not found "all" of the ways to get around issues. I've had 64-bit ooRexx 4.1.0 installed, but as you may know

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

On 11/24/2011 11:12 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > >> No, I havn't - but I'll try that. >> /s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm > Bill, > > I'm curious, did you get 32-bit ooRexx installed? > > -- > Mark Miesfeld > >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > No, I havn't - but I'll try that. > /s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm Bill, I'm curious, did you get 32-bit ooRexx installed? -- Mark Miesfeld -- All the data contin

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

Here is a link to a simple tutorial: How to Install 32-bit Deb Packages on a 64-bit System http://www.unixtutorial.org/2008/03/install-32-bit-deb-packages-on-64-bit/ It basically says what Moritz suggested, but you might want to read it for some insight. -- Mark Miesfeld On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 a

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

No, I havn't - but I'll try that. /s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm On 11/18/2011 05:51 AM, Moritz Hoffmann wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > did you try to install it with --force-architecture dpkg option? Of > course, this will require ia32 libraries to be available. An

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, did you try to install it with --force-architecture dpkg option? Of course, this will require ia32 libraries to be available. And, you may run into strange situations. Moritz On 11/17/2011 06:20 PM, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > Would it be pos

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > Would it be possible to create a   ooRexx-4.1.0-ubuntu1004.x86_32.deb   and > add it to the Sourceforge depository so that I can have a 32-bit version of > ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system? > > I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

If the 32bit rexxsql isn't dependent on other 32bit code (db drivers?), you can recompile rexxsql to 64bit. Bruce P.S. I don't remember having this much trouble mixing 24bit and 31bit on IBM mainframes. Selective memory? On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > Would it be

[Oorexx-devel] Need 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 LTS Linux system

Would it be possible to create a ooRexx-4.1.0-ubuntu1004.x86_32.deb and add it to the Sourceforge depository so that I can have a 32-bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 that will run in a x86 64-bit