Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Web Client Print Templates - "You Saved" Calculator

John, Terran Thank you so much, I have been fighting with this for days, im not particularly oh-fey with AngularJS. Now onto the next receipt… Stuart *** Stuart Forrest PhD IT Analyst Beaufort County Library System 843 255 6450

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Web Client Print Templates - "You Saved" Calculator

Great! Glad it works! Terran McCanna PINES Program Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, GA 30345 404-235-7138 tmcca...@georgialibraries.org On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:03 PM, John Amundson wrote: > Thanks, Terran! > > That seems to

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Web Client Print Templates - "You Saved" Calculator

Thanks, Terran! That seems to do the trick. If anyone is curious about how I added this to the checkout receipt: ... You Saved{{transactions.subtotal | currency}} by borrowing from {{current_location.name}}! ... John Amundson |

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Web Client Print Templates - "You Saved" Calculator

I have an example here that subtotals bill amounts: https://pines.georgialibraries.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=circ:workstations:receipts#subtotals I haven't tested this scenario, but you should be able to do something similar... 1) Set up am empty variable before the ng-repeat loop: 2) Somewhere

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Web Client Print Templates - "You Saved" Calculator

Hi, We are preparing for our move to the web client and are currently going through and updating print templates. For the Checkout, Items Out, and Renew templates, many of our libraries print "You saved $x.yz by borrowing from your local library." The price of the items out would be added

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Lost Materials Processing Fee - Option to not void on return

Ah, now I remember why I didn’t consider these. We only want to not void processing fees for lost and paid items. We want to void the processing fee for lost items. It is only when someone pays for something, indicating that they think they won’t be able to find it, that we may order a new

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Hybrid Consortium: FIFO and Opportunistic

Yes, you have it correct. At checkin, the system uses the best hold sort order associated with the copies owning lib. Another side effect of using different best hold sort methods is that explaining it to staff gets convoluted. You can double check me also by looking at the code at

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Hybrid Consortium: FIFO and Opportunistic

Hi Josh, This is very helpful. Just so I understand... Library System A uses FIFO and Library Systems B and C do not. There is resource sharing between all three library systems with 3 Month Age Protection. The item reaches the three month mark. At that time, the holds queue looks like this

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Lost Materials Processing Fee - Option to not void on return

Thank you very much, sorry I missed seeing these in the first place. Josh Stompro - LARL IT Director From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Andrea Buntz Neiman Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:22 AM To: Evergreen Discussion Group

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Lost Materials Processing Fee - Option to not void on return

We use those settings so that we don't automatically void any processing fees. On the occasions where a library does want to void a processing fee, they do it manually. Terran McCanna PINES Program Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, GA 30345 404-235-7138

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Lost Materials Processing Fee - Option to not void on return

Hi Josh, There are a few true/false library settings related to voiding processing fees: Void processing fee on lost item return Void lost item processing fee when claims returned Void processing fee on long-overdue item return Void longoverdue item processing fee when claims returned Would

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Lost Materials Processing Fee - Option to not void on return

Hello, I'm just curious if any other locations have this policy and how they have handled it. We currently have the policy of not refunding the Lost Materials processing fee when a lost and paid item is returned. Our thinking is that the lost processing fee covers some of the costs of

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Hybrid Consortium: FIFO and Opportunistic

Hello Scott, we are much smaller than your organization, one system has 23 org units and the other has 10 org units. But we do have one system using request time as one of their primary sorts. They are not using pure FIFO, but request time is the determining sort for holds in the same system.

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Hybrid Consortium: FIFO and Opportunistic

Hi, Our consortium is currently at 121 members and growing. While individual library systems practice resource sharing and we are in the midst of a resource sharing trial between three more distant libraries, we do not have consortium-wide resource sharing at this time. Holds consortium-wide