Hi Jesse,
After I responded to your e-mail, I submitted a bug with some code to
make this change to the 3.0.2-3.0.3 upgrade script. If you look at the
submitted code, you'll see exactly how you would add the lines to that
particular script. You could copy and paste the code the additions
Thanks again for the info. We are on 2.10.3 now and upgrading to 3.0.3. How
would I go about re-enabling the triggers mentioned and is disabling them as
simple as copy/paste the code snipped Kathy sent into the upgrade script? For
combing the scripts, would it just be copy/paste the contents of
Jason,
Thank you for this information. Regarding this particular bug, it is too
serious to leave to #3, and we don't have the wherewithal to do #1 so we may
try to do #2...but will likely need funding partners...which brings us to #4:
work together to get it fixed.
Scott
-Original
On 03/29/2018 11:27 AM, scott.tho...@sparkpa.org wrote:
> I agree this is an impediment to implementing the Web Client in
> centralized or semi-centralized cataloging departments (of which we have
> many). I am just not conversant on the ins & outs of how to get fixes
> into a release versus a
To be clear, nobody is talking about getting rid of Holdings
Maintenance. It has a new name - holdings view - and there have been
some changes in the display, some of which are improvements and other
changes that are causing problems, some of which are significant. But I
haven't heard anyone
All -
From a 'end user' / power user standpoint (and the admin) PLEASE PLEASE don't
get rid of the Holdings Maintenance view / screen / option!!Oh my. We use
that for so many things. It just helps visually to know where a volume is, if
it is labeled correctly, if it has copies
>> The Syndetics Classic content we subscribe to displays under the
"Summaries and more" tab. It's OK, but not as nice as the fancy Unbound
stuff. Although I do notice that we, although we are apparently paying for
it, do not have the Professional Reviews... I wonder if that is related to
the
Elaine,
I agree this is an impediment to implementing the Web Client in centralized
or semi-centralized cataloging departments (of which we have many). I am just
not conversant on the ins & outs of how to get fixes into a release versus a
maintenance release versus a patch.
Scott
From:
Well, at least their sales message is consistent!
FWIW, because maybe they use the same title for their mock-up?, this is a link
to our current catalog for Raven Boys -
http://evergreen.owwl.org/eg/opac/record/442294.
The Syndetics Classic content we subscribe to displays under the
We would need it fixed sooner, if all or libraries are to move to the web
client for cataloging.
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia Public Library Service/PINES
1800 Century Place, Ste. 150
Atlanta, GA 30045
404.235.7128 Office
404.548.4241 Cell
404.235.7201 FAX
On
Elaine,
Thank you. This is ringing a bell now, but I did not internalize it until
one of my libraries complained and documented it. This is really bad. I noticed
it has a high priority but is unassigned. What can we do to get this fixed in
3.2 if not sooner?
Scott
Sent from my iPhone
On
Scott,
There is a bug report for this --
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1715697
It is very problematic. Many of or libraries have more than 5 branches and
this bug makes it impossible for them to use the web client
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia
Yes, this is one of the very first things we noticed and is a showstopper
for me personally. I do not use the web client to add items. It was so much
easier in XUL. There is a bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1715697
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:12 AM scott.tho...@sparkpa.org <
I just had this reported to me, and it does seem to be problematic. Many of our
libraries use Holdings Maintenance in XUL as the first step in adding volumes
and copies. This works out well because, even if a given library system has no
volumes or copies under a given title, the org unit tree
14 matches
Mail list logo
