Mike Christie wrote:
> Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> On 29 Apr 2009 at 11:25, Mike Christie wrote:
>>
>>> Ulrich Windl wrote:
On 28 Apr 2009 at 7:10, HIMANSHU wrote:
> One more question analogues to this.
>
> Suppose I login to 1st target from machine 30.12,it was having node
>
Mike Christie wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> HIMANSHU wrote:
>>> Exactly Ulrich,there can be a better approach.
>>> I am now having iscsiadm version 2.0-870,but still I am having a
>>> problem in case of 2 targets having different NODE authentication.
>>>
>>> My scenario
>>>
>>> Suppose 2 targets
Mike Christie wrote:
> HIMANSHU wrote:
>> Exactly Ulrich,there can be a better approach.
>> I am now having iscsiadm version 2.0-870,but still I am having a
>> problem in case of 2 targets having different NODE authentication.
>>
>> My scenario
>>
>> Suppose 2 targets (having different NODE AUTHEN
HIMANSHU wrote:
> Exactly Ulrich,there can be a better approach.
> I am now having iscsiadm version 2.0-870,but still I am having a
> problem in case of 2 targets having different NODE authentication.
>
> My scenario
>
> Suppose 2 targets (having different NODE AUTHENTICATION,assuming same
> DIS
Ulrich Windl wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2009 at 11:25, Mike Christie wrote:
>
>> Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> On 28 Apr 2009 at 7:10, HIMANSHU wrote:
>>>
One more question analogues to this.
Suppose I login to 1st target from machine 30.12,it was having node
authentication.so I saved its c
Exactly Ulrich,there can be a better approach.
I am now having iscsiadm version 2.0-870,but still I am having a
problem in case of 2 targets having different NODE authentication.
My scenario
Suppose 2 targets (having different NODE AUTHENTICATION,assuming same
DISCOVERY AUTHENTICATION) from same
On 29 Apr 2009 at 11:25, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > On 28 Apr 2009 at 7:10, HIMANSHU wrote:
> >
> >> One more question analogues to this.
> >>
> >> Suppose I login to 1st target from machine 30.12,it was having node
> >> authentication.so I saved its credentials in iscsid.
Ulrich Windl wrote:
> On 28 Apr 2009 at 7:10, HIMANSHU wrote:
>
>> One more question analogues to this.
>>
>> Suppose I login to 1st target from machine 30.12,it was having node
>> authentication.so I saved its credentials in iscsid.conf and then I
>> fired the discovery command followed by login
On 28 Apr 2009 at 7:10, HIMANSHU wrote:
>
> One more question analogues to this.
>
> Suppose I login to 1st target from machine 30.12,it was having node
> authentication.so I saved its credentials in iscsid.conf and then I
> fired the discovery command followed by login command.It was
> success
HIMANSHU wrote:
> One more question analogues to this.
>
> Suppose I login to 1st target from machine 30.12,it was having node
> authentication.so I saved its credentials in iscsid.conf and then I
> fired the discovery command followed by login command.It was
> successful and those credentials al
One more question analogues to this.
Suppose I login to 1st target from machine 30.12,it was having node
authentication.so I saved its credentials in iscsid.conf and then I
fired the discovery command followed by login command.It was
successful and those credentials also got stored in nodes and
s
Thank you very much Mike for all this.
Can you please give me the test src rpm for CentOS 5.4?
On Apr 27, 8:50 pm, Mike Christie wrote:
> HIMANSHU wrote:
> > I am now having 'iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.868-0.18.el5' and
> > performed the steps mentioned in my last post.
>
> > Still after when I
HIMANSHU wrote:
> I am now having 'iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.868-0.18.el5' and
> performed the steps mentioned in my last post.
>
> Still after when I discover using 'iscsiadm -m discovery -t
> sendtargets -p 192.168.30.12 -o new -o
> delete',nodes and sendtargets entries gets overwritten.
>
Is there any method or should I debug to know the exact cause of this
overwriting problem?
On Apr 24, 6:29 pm, HIMANSHU wrote:
> I am now having 'iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.868-0.18.el5' and
> performed the steps mentioned in my last post.
>
> Still after when I discover using 'iscsiadm -m disc
I am now having 'iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.868-0.18.el5' and
performed the steps mentioned in my last post.
Still after when I discover using 'iscsiadm -m discovery -t
sendtargets -p 192.168.30.12 -o new -o
delete',nodes and sendtargets entries gets overwritten.
I am also not performing any t
HIMANSHU wrote:
> Thank you really.But I have not got the expected results.
>
> Steps
>
> 1. iscsiadm -m discovery -t sendtargets -p 192.168.30.12 -o new -o
> delete
>
> 2. iscsiadm -m node -T iqn.2009-04.com.systems:Target1 -p
> 192.168.30.12:3260 -o update -n node.startup -v automatic
>
>
Thank you really.But I have not got the expected results.
Steps
1. iscsiadm -m discovery -t sendtargets -p 192.168.30.12 -o new -o
delete
2. iscsiadm -m node -T iqn.2009-04.com.systems:Target1 -p
192.168.30.12:3260 -o update -n node.startup -v automatic
so '/var/lib/iscsi/nodes/iqn.2009-04.
HIMANSHU wrote:
> Yeah.This worked for me.I specified 'node.startup=manual' in
> 'iscsid.conf'.
> so running update command to change it to 'automatic' only on login(or
> I will give option for persistent connection across reboot).
> But my problem these changes vanish after another discovery comm
Thank you very much all.Problem is solved,but I am having doubt.
@Mike
On Apr 21, 5:08 am, Mike Christie wrote:
> HIMANSHU wrote:
> > I discovered 2 machine,192.168.7.50(containing 10 targets,out of which
> > performed login on 2) and 192.168.7.51(containing 5 targets,out of
> > which performe
HIMANSHU wrote:
> I discovered 2 machine,192.168.7.50(containing 10 targets,out of which
> performed login on 2) and 192.168.7.51(containing 5 targets,out of
> which performed login on 3).I am using IET target and 'iscsi-initiator-
> utils-6.2.0.868-0.7.el5' initiator.
>
> So at present there ar
On 20 Apr 2009 at 2:46, HIMANSHU wrote:
>
> I discovered 2 machine,192.168.7.50(containing 10 targets,out of which
> performed login on 2) and 192.168.7.51(containing 5 targets,out of
> which performed login on 3).I am using IET target and 'iscsi-initiator-
> utils-6.2.0.868-0.7.el5' initiator.
I discovered 2 machine,192.168.7.50(containing 10 targets,out of which
performed login on 2) and 192.168.7.51(containing 5 targets,out of
which performed login on 3).I am using IET target and 'iscsi-initiator-
utils-6.2.0.868-0.7.el5' initiator.
So at present there are 5 connections on initiator
22 matches
Mail list logo