Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Removing LSB support from OE

2019-07-15 Thread richard . purdie
On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 15:35 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 15:33, > wrote: > > > Would you expect the yocto LSB kernels support move to that layer > > > as > > > well? IIRC, these the the ones that build the LTS kernels. > > > > No, "poky-lsb" should really be renamed

Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Removing LSB support from OE

2019-07-15 Thread Burton, Ross
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 15:33, wrote: > > Would you expect the yocto LSB kernels support move to that layer as > > well? IIRC, these the the ones that build the LTS kernels. > > No, "poky-lsb" should really be renamed "poky-altconfig" or something > similar, its really a set of alternate

Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Removing LSB support from OE

2019-07-15 Thread richard . purdie
On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 07:25 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > On 7/15/19 2:34 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Its been discussed before and I think everyone agrees that it > > should > > move to its own layer. I will therefore take a patch which does > > that. > > > > The layer will need a maintainer and

Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Removing LSB support from OE

2019-07-15 Thread akuster808
On 7/15/19 2:34 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 11:38 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:31:28AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> On 6/26/19 9:42 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 14:48, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> ... > If anyone is actually

Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Removing LSB support from OE

2019-07-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:31:28AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 6/26/19 9:42 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 14:48, Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > >> If anyone is actually interested in LSB in OE, the natural approach > >> would in any case be to create a meta-lsb layer that could

Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Removing LSB support from OE

2019-06-26 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/26/19 9:42 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 14:48, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> GTK 4 is expected soon, but currently there are already both GTK 2 >> and GTK 3 in oe-core. >> >> GTK 2 doesn't have any important users left in oe-core. > > The biggest user is alsa-utils and I've been

Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Removing LSB support from OE

2019-06-26 Thread Burton, Ross
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 14:48, Adrian Bunk wrote: > GTK 4 is expected soon, but currently there are already both GTK 2 > and GTK 3 in oe-core. > > GTK 2 doesn't have any important users left in oe-core. The biggest user is alsa-utils and I've been meaning for a long time to remove those tools

[Openembedded-architecture] Removing LSB support from OE

2019-06-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
GTK 4 is expected soon, but currently there are already both GTK 2 and GTK 3 in oe-core. GTK 2 doesn't have any important users left in oe-core. The biggest obstacle for moving GTK 2 from oe-core to meta-oe would be packagegroup-core-lsb-desktop depending on it. AFAIK the LSB approach never got