://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX
Dave Hill updated it recently, so it is reasonably current.
-- Kevin
John C. Turnbull wrote:
> I would like to set up a development environment for the OpenJFX
> project but have never attempted this before.
>
>
>
> I am very f
I would like to set up a development environment for the OpenJFX project but
have never attempted this before.
I am very familiar with all 3 major Java IDEs with my preference (in order
of most favourite to least favourite) is Eclipse, IntelliJ, NetBeans (so
whichever one is "best" doesn't
Now that Xamarin owns RoboVM, will it still be available for use in porting
JavaFX to mobiles such as done currently by Gluon given that Xamarin and JavaFX
are competitors?
Thanks,
-jct
OK, thanks Johan – that’s good news.
Do you know if the proposed Oracle JVM for iOS will support AOT or not?
Thanks,
-jct
From: Johan Vos [mailto:johan@gluonhq.com]
Sent: Saturday, 2 January 2016 05:17
To: John C. Turnbull <ozem...@ozemail.com.au>
Cc: openj
I am a tad confused.
Google has announced that its next version of Android will be based entirely on
the OpenJDK.
Could this be a eureka moment for JavaFX? I mean, wouldn't it be the case then
that using JavaFX to develop an Android app would actually be a way to create a
"native" app, hence
When will WebView support WebGL?
Thanks,
-jct
if it is possible, Jim ?
Thank you,
Felipe
On Aug 18, 2014, at 1:28 AM, John C. Turnbull ozem...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
Hi Felipe,
I just finished watching your excellent presentation at SVJUGFX on text
rendering with JavaFX and have a couple of multi part questions:
1) I noted
Richard, I totally agree on the subjective nature of font appreciation but
that's not really what I am highlighting here. What I am seeing is a difference
between the quality of font rendering between JFX and native apps on the same
machine with the same font etc. and the JFX rendering is
releases to test in the not too distant
future...
Btw, as I mentioned in another thread we are looking to pull LCD-on-Canvas
into an 8-update release (possibly 8u40).
-- Kevin
John C. Turnbull wrote:
Hi Felipe,
Thanks for your prompt and informative response.
I won't be able
How would you (easily) use it in the scenegraph if it wasn't a Node?
-Original Message-
From: openjfx-dev [mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of
Jeff Martin
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:16 AM
To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing
Subject: Should Canvas have
Are there any threading issues regarding paying an audio clip with
MediaPlayer (a WAV file) and having a number of animations happening
concurrently? I am finding that my JavaFX application can play the WAV file
just fine when I start the application but as soon as I kick-off a series of
I have created https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-32881 but cannot see
how I can attach anything... how do I do that?
-Original Message-
From: John C. Turnbull [mailto:ozem...@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 12 September 2013 07:37
To: 'Chien Yang'
Cc: 'Kevin Rushforth'; 'openjfx
screen after some time
Seems to be related to this issue:
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-30362
And no, unfortunately Scene Builder is not always immune to this, I got it
with SB regularly
HTH,
Jerome
On 9/10/13 7:55 AM, John C. Turnbull wrote:
I am not sure if it is a known issue but any
[mailto:jerome.cam...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 September 2013 18:01
To: John C. Turnbull
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: JavaFX applications turning to black screen after some time
And I realize you are certainly on Fx 2.2, since although we are working
hard on it, SB on Fx 8
Message-
From: Kevin Rushforth [mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 September 2013 23:01
To: John C. Turnbull
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: 3D scene antialiasing
Yes, it should be working for both D3D (as of b105) and OpenGL (earlier than
that).
-- Kevin
John
Just FYI, media classes are still missing from the JavaDoc for JavaFX in JDK
8 b105.
-jct
Sorry to harp on about this but the media classes are missing from b106
JavaDoc as well in case Oracle is not aware of this.
From: John C. Turnbull [mailto:ozem...@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Monday, 9 September 2013 20:31
To: 'openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net'
Subject: Media classes still missing from
MADNESS :-).
On Sep 9, 2013, at 8:08 PM, John C. Turnbull ozem...@ozemail.com.au
wrote:
Sorry to harp on about this but the media classes are missing from
b106 JavaDoc as well in case Oracle is not aware of this.
From: John C. Turnbull [mailto:ozem...@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Monday, 9
Could someone please let me know if support for 3D scene antialiasing is
supposed to be working in JDK8 b106?
If not, when is this feature expected to be implemented?
Thanks,
-jct
I am not sure if it is a known issue but any JavaFX application I run and
then leave minimised for some time (say 15mins+) and then restore will have
an entirely black window with nothing actually visible. This is on Windows
7 and Scene Builder curiously seems to be immune to this problem.
this helps,
Felipe
On Aug 27, 2013, at 3:42 AM, John C. Turnbull wrote:
I am still hoping someone can answer my questions on this topic
(included here for convenience):
1. When will both (1) and (2) make it into a JDK8 development build?
2. Are there any other plans/techniques to improve font
Now that JavaFX 8 will include 3D support, are there plans for a set of
Transitions especially suitable for 3D animations?
Thanks,
-jct
Cc: John C. Turnbull; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing
Subject: Re: Poor quality font rendering
Are you seeing the different defaults for LCD smoothing? The Text default
is Grey and the Control default (which Label inherits) is LCD.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Scott Palmer swpal
so I don't see why there would
be any difference.
Thanks,
-jct
-Original Message-
From: openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
[mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of John C. Turnbull
Sent: Friday, 23 August 2013 17:23
To: 'Phil Race'; 'John Hendrikx'; 'Felipe Heidrich'
Cc
OK, thanks to everyone who has contributed input to this thread - it's been
most enlightening.
So, in summary, it seems that the dark art of font rendering is complex and
made more so by having to support numerous different operating systems, font
engines, GPUs and monitors etc.
I am sure JavaFX
enhancements planned?
Thanks,
-jct
-Original Message-
From: Richard Bair [mailto:richard.b...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2013 01:16
To: John C. Turnbull
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Poor quality font rendering
We're using the native font rasterizer. Can you
21, 2013, at 5:53 AM, John C. Turnbull wrote:
I have only really tested JavaFX extensively on Windows so my comments
here apply mainly to that platform.
It seems that even with a font smoothing type of LCD, font rendering
in JavaFX is not at the same level of quality of native
colored fringes on my glyphs.
On 21/08/2013 14:53, John C. Turnbull wrote:
I have only really tested JavaFX extensively on Windows so my
comments here apply mainly to that platform.
It seems that even with a font smoothing type of LCD, font rendering
in JavaFX is not at the same level
:39, John C. Turnbull wrote:
John H, it may be just me but pretty much *all* the fonts in your screenshot
look quite poor and noticeably different from native font rendering. If you
look for instance at the text in the Plot section, to me that text looks
awful.
Is that inside a WebView
not sure if
this is still the case,
but contrast is very important for text and you should make sure its as high
as possible.
-phil.
On 8/22/2013 11:35 AM, John C. Turnbull wrote:
Am I the only one who looks at that screenshot and thinks that the fonts
look really bad and obviously
I have only really tested JavaFX extensively on Windows so my comments here
apply mainly to that platform.
It seems that even with a font smoothing type of LCD, font rendering in
JavaFX is not at the same level of quality of native applications. My
current experiences are with JavaFX 8 b103
I seem to remember some time ago that work was done on reducing the jitter
in the ball's motion in the Brick Breaker demo in Ensemble8.
Did this ever make it into the main line? I ask because I have just
installed JDK 8 b101 and the ball still shows very significant jitter in its
motion on
Thanks Peter, does that mean we have to wait till b101?
-Original Message-
From: openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
[mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Peter
Zhelezniakov
Sent: Tuesday, 30 July 2013 21:00
To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: JavaFX in JDK
hub of the
JavaFX community than the java.net community page?
Regards,
John
-Original Message-
From: openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
[mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of John C. Turnbull
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 5:20 PM
To: 'Daniel Zwolenski
I run Ensemble8 and clicking on any demo results in:
Exception in thread JavaFX Application Thread
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: D:\Java\jdk\1.8.0\jre\bin\jfxwebkit.dll:
Can't find dependent libraries
at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
It is reported as an issue with WebView but unfortunately it means that
Ensemble8 cannot run any demo at all :-(
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Giles [mailto:jonathan.gi...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 July 2013 09:53
To: John C. Turnbull
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re
will compare with native iPhone and WebGL apps in
terms of quality and performance.
Thanks,
John
-Original Message-
From: Richard Bair [mailto:richard.b...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013 03:51
To: John C. Turnbull
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Antialiasing in 3D
-Original Message-
From: Richard Bair [mailto:richard.b...@oracle.com]
Sent: Saturday, 27 July 2013 01:40
To: John C. Turnbull
Cc: 'Daniel Zwolenski'; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Can JavaFX do CAD?
For Flash, there are literally millions of examples of
fancy/complex/impressive
there using it right?
In the end it doesn't matter if I personally see enormous potential for
JavaFX if I cannot convince others to see what I see.
-jct
From: Daniel Zwolenski [mailto:zon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 27 July 2013 09:12
To: John C. Turnbull
Cc: Richard Bair; openjfx-dev
I am not sure who to mention this to but the JavaFX examples on the JDK 8
page are still stuck at b97 even though b98 of the JDK is there. This means
that the Ensemble8 app is still not present in the set of samples.
Can someone fix this?
-jct
I am very impressed with the JavaFX properties and bindings functionality
and feel that it is far more general in scope than just a UI toolkit like
JavaFX. For me, I think the entire feature should be moved to a standard
Java package so that it can readily be used in non-JavaFX applications.
I totally agree. I have always expected Google to move away from everything
Java or Java-related after the Oracle court case and several industry pundits
are expecting the same thing. GWT will become Dart based (if they retain it at
all) and I wouldn't be surprised to see C or C++ become the
, yes.
However I don't believe we've played with the kerning metrics yet (Felipe?)
Richard
On Jun 20, 2013, at 9:43 PM, John C. Turnbull ozem...@ozemail.com.au
wrote:
So when will we see this new native font rendering? Is it in b94?
Also, will this result in an improvement in rendering
I have posted before about my belief that it is essential for JavaFX to
support custom shaders before its upcoming 3D API can really be considered
fully fledged. Indeed I truly believe that this is an absolutely critical
feature and that without it JavaFX will not be adopted for serious 3D
Message-
From: Richard Bair [mailto:richard.b...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, 21 June 2013 17:41
To: John C. Turnbull
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Custom shaders for JavaFX
1. What are Oracle's plans (if any) for custom shader support in
future versions of JavaFX?
What we've
So when will we see this new native font rendering? Is it in b94?
Also, will this result in an improvement in rendering quality?
On 21/06/2013, at 14:35, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Up until now we've been using T2K to do font measurement / rasterizing. It is
what is used
...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, 31 May 2013 01:12
To: John C. Turnbull
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: JavaFX graphics performance and suitability for advanced
animations
Hi John,
Graphics? Yes, to a point. But my post was really about graphics and
the issues related to performance
47 matches
Mail list logo
