Re: OpenJFX status update

Have anyone tried to build the javapackager code with OpenJDK 11 and create a javapackager executable file? It could be used as a standalone tool until the new jpackager is ready. This shouldn't be too hard to do, presuming that you can't use the javapackager from JDK 10. You will need to

Re: OpenJFX status update

> > The javapackager tool and associated jdk.packager and > jdk.packager.services modules have been removed from the JDK along with > JavaFX. They are not part of the standalone JavaFX builds. > > -- Kevin > > What options are there if one relies on the javapackager to create native runtime images

Re: OpenJFX status update

I was somewhat imprecise. That should have read: We still expect to do a release of JavaFX 11 around the same time as JDK 11, but using a different **JBS release version** will help track the actual content of JavaFX 11 separately from JDK 11. The JavaFX version is still 11 as reported by

Re: OpenJFX status update

Sure. No problem. -- Kevin On 5/18/2018 1:22 PM, Nir Lisker wrote: I see, sorry about the false flag. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Kevin Rushforth > wrote: I was somewhat imprecise. That should have read: We

Re: OpenJFX status update

I see, sorry about the false flag. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > I was somewhat imprecise. That should have read: > > We still expect to do a release of JavaFX 11 around the same time as JDK > 11, but using a different **JBS release

Re: OpenJFX status update

> > We still expect to do a release of JavaFX 11 around the same time as JDK > 11, but using a different release number will help track the actual content > of JavaFX 11 separately from JDK 11. Iv'e just realized that not releasing JavaFX with version number 11 will cause confusion with all the

Re: OpenJFX status update

Hi Johan, On 5/18/2018 4:51 AM, Johan Vos wrote: Hi Kevin, Related to point 3: what exactly do you mean with "Java FX has been removed from JDK 11"? It isn't part of the OpenJDK 11-ea13 either so I don't see the difference? It was removed from the Oracle JDK 11 (it never was part of OpenJDK

Re: OpenJFX status update

Hi Kevin, Related to point 3: what exactly do you mean with "Java FX has been removed from JDK 11"? It isn't part of the OpenJDK 11-ea13 either so I don't see the difference? I thought references to JavaFX would be removed from sun.launcher.LauncherHelper, but they are still there. Do you know

Re: OpenJFX status update

On 5/17/2018 3:16 AM, Ty Young wrote: And could the new standalone modules be integrated with the source code somehow so that a JDK without JavaFX support can be compiled? Not sure what you mean, but you can use an OpenJDK without modules + the JavaFX standalone modules to build and run

Re: OpenJFX status update

On 05/16/2018 02:04 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: On 5/16/2018 10:49 AM, Ty Young wrote: That one, as mentioned in the wiki build guide. I get an immediate build fail(see: https://pastebin.com/geR4LLMm). The JDK works just fine: I can set it as the default JDK, run Netbeans, set the project

Re: OpenJFX status update

It needs a lot of work. I’m reminded as a see all the issues I’ve reported against it are being reassigned today. Despite the issues, Javapackager was one of the best things to happen for Java deployment in many years. I’m kinda bummed that it didn’t make it to OpenJDK. jlink isn’t really

Re: OpenJFX status update

Alright great, no complaints from me then :). On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > Yes, the source code for javapackager is fully open source. > > -- Kevin > > > > On 5/16/2018 1:05 PM, Michael Ennen wrote: > > Is the source code for

Re: OpenJFX status update

Yes, the source code for javapackager is fully open source. -- Kevin On 5/16/2018 1:05 PM, Michael Ennen wrote: Is the source code for javapackager fully open source? Thanks. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth >

Re: OpenJFX status update

Is the source code for javapackager fully open source? Thanks. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and > has never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the

Re: OpenJFX status update

On 5/16/2018 11:54 AM, Nir Lisker wrote: What will happen to the JavaDocs? Will they be removed from the EA docs and upon release from the release docs? Correct. The JDK 11 docs will no longer include JavaFX modules and classes. We will need to host separate docs for JavaFX. -- Kevin

Re: OpenJFX status update

On 5/16/2018 10:49 AM, Ty Young wrote: That one, as mentioned in the wiki build guide. I get an immediate build fail(see: https://pastebin.com/geR4LLMm). The JDK works just fine: I can set it as the default JDK, run Netbeans, set the project source to 11, and my application builds just

Re: OpenJFX status update

What will happen to the JavaDocs? Will they be removed from the EA docs and upon release from the release docs? - Nir On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > I wanted to update you on the progress of the last couple weeks on the > OpenJFX

Re: OpenJFX status update

That sounds like a good idea. Alan > On May 16, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth > wrote: > > The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and has > never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the standalone JavaFX > bundles,

Re: OpenJFX status update

On 05/16/2018 10:42 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: On 5/15/2018 11:57 PM, Ty Young wrote: 3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX. I'm not sure if it's intentional or perhaps a bug on my end, but

Re: OpenJFX status update

The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and has never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the standalone JavaFX bundles, and doesn't really fit in a standalone FX release. We are looking at the possibility of providing a replacement packaging tool in

Re: OpenJFX status update

On 5/15/2018 11:57 PM, Ty Young wrote: 3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX. I'm not sure if it's intentional or perhaps a bug on my end, but I cannot compile JavaFX without Oracle JDK(9 or

Re: OpenJFX status update

3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX. 4. After jdk-11+14 is posted on java.net, and FX is no longer included in JDK 11, we will start using openjfx-11 as the fix version in JBS to distinguish

Re: OpenJFX status update

Where does java packager fit in this? > On May 15, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Kevin Rushforth > wrote: > > I wanted to update you on the progress of the last couple weeks on the > OpenJFX project: > > 1. As mentioned last week, we now have EA builds of OpenJFX 11 on