Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006, David M. Fetter wrote:
I notice that the latest 2-STABLE-20061018 release is now including the
EVAL src.rpms. In addition, it seems that there are inter-dependencies
between CORE, BASE, PLUS and EVAL which don't particularly leave me w
from
EVAL. EVAL, of course, could pretty much have dependencies wherever
since it is for evaluation only. Anyway, I thought I would send this
suggestion out.
--
David M. Fetter - Portland State University - UNIX Systems Administrator
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the
#x27;-lcharset' flag?
--
David M. Fetter - Portland State University - UNIX Systems Administrator
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Ok. That's what I'm already doing basically. I was just hoping for
some openpkg-tools method or something. No biggie. Thanks. ;-)
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 20:35 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > Is there a simply built-
Is there a simply built-in method to query all installed rpms for what
build options are used?
--
David M. Fetter - Portland State University - UNIX Systems Administrator
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." ~Einstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 08:25 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > Nope. Still getting the error. My build options are as follows:
> >
> > -Dopenssh::with_alias=no
> > -Dopenssh::with_chroot=no
> > -Dop
::with_trysetpath=yes
-Dopenssh::with_watchdog=no
-Dopenssh::with_wrap=yes
-Dopenssh::with_x11=yes
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:19 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > Just an FYI, I'm getting the following error on both RHEL4 and Sol10
> >
with fuzz 1 (offset 340 lines).
patching file sshd_config
Hunk #1 succeeded at 101 (offset 1 line).
patching file sshd_config.5
Hunk #1 succeeded at 897 with fuzz 2 (offset 120 lines).
error: Bad exit status from /usr/local/RPM/ROOT/TMP/rpm-tmp.11288 (%
prep)
--
David M. Fetter - Portland State Univer
Ok, this might work. I'll play with it. Thanks.
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 21:09 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > > > Will the openpkg fix be MFC'd into the 2.20060622 stable release as an
> > &g
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 19:37 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > Will the openpkg fix be MFC'd into the 2.20060622 stable release as an
> > UPD? It would be nice if it was.
>
> Hmmm no, I don't think we
otstrap package. Please give them
> a try and test it to make sure it doesn't break in any new way.
>
> Ralf S. Engelschall
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>www.engelschall.com
>
> __
Ah, sorry. Posting in haste. It's on Solaris 10 sparc64.
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 07:50 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > This seems to be a problem again. See below:
> >
> > ld: fatal: relocations remain against
7;timezone' was here
> | make: *** [eputil.o] Error 1
>
>Ralf S. Engelschall
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>www.engelschall.com
>
> __________
d and added as part of the 2.6 release.
--
David M. Fetter - Portland State University - UNIX Systems Administrator
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." ~Einstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
r undertaking. That will have to be figured
out (unless it's already known) then the time to do it will have to be
determined. That's the tough part...time. Time is our nemesis! We
should've never made that up. ;-) In any case, what say you all?
Thoughts/ideas?
--
Davi
lude %{l_prefix}. It definitely
should not include any sbin paths because part of the reason is to lock
the pathing down if you want a more secure openssh installation. In any
case, I am only one opinion and as I said, I wanted to open this up for
discussion. So, what do the rest of you think?
--
x27;t installing the sparcv9 java bits. I just uploaded this to
contrib. FYI.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University
"There are 10 types of people in the world, those that understand binary
and those that don't."
signature.asc
Description: This i
appreciate hearing how. Thanks.
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 14:53 -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 17:04 -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 13:35 -0700, Doug Summers wrote:
> > > >
> > > Well, I didn't have to patch anything wi
Super! Thanks.
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 20:41 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:21 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
> > >
> > > &
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:21 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > It doesn't seem that any fixes for the default path problem has been put
> > into UPD, at least for OpenPKG 2.3. Not sure if it was put into OpenPKG
>
? If
not, then we will need to do something else on our side.
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 12:16 -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
> I just uploaded it the modified one and this is the follow up
> explanation of what the contributed spec file has that is different.
>
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 21:13
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 17:04 -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 13:35 -0700, Doug Summers wrote:
> > >
> > Well, I didn't have to patch anything with the Samba 3.0.14a code I
> > downloaded from samba.org. The only issues I had were with Ker
ect www.openpkg.org
> Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
>
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ime ago and it was on my task list for my place of work to get it
implemented, though priorities changed. From my research into it, there
is a special patch that is not in the current sources for samba that
must be applied in order for ADS to function properly. You can find
examples of the patch by looking at other linux distributions because
they all pretty much included it so they can advertise the
functionality. So, the answer is, yes there are plans to add this but
it's a little more work than just adding an option.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
uld be put into UPD areas. This is a known problem under 2.3. Not
sure if the problem still exists under 2.4 because we haven't upgraded
to that as of yet.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
I just uploaded it the modified one and this is the follow up
explanation of what the contributed spec file has that is different.
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 21:13 +0200, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > This spec file for openssh simply has t
This spec file for openssh simply has the hardcoded --with-default-path
and --disable-etc-default-login removed from it because these are
essentially not appropriate for a generic environment, etc.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
7;openpkg rpm -Uhv --force tcl.rpm expect.rpm' in one command. That
resolves the issue right there. Can this be done? Would it be
difficult?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is way PATH is reset by the
> system after sshd forked off its child), etc.
>
>Ralf S. Engelschall
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>www.engelschall.com
>
> __________
Project www.openpkg.org
> User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
>
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
> The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
> Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
>
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 07:48 +0200, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:57:20PM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > Ok, so the installed postgresql7 does show this:
> > Hmmm, well, we didn't build it 'with_mta=yes'. The installed instance
>
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:21 +0200, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:08:26PM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > FATAL: errors occured while building:
> > bind-9.3.0-2.3.0: bind searches a frood called 'postgresql'
> > jabberd-2.0s6-2.3.
dilemma seems to only occur
on our Solaris build server but not on our Linux build server. Anybody
have any ideas about this or can it be fixed as a UPD?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 20:59 +0200, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:39:33AM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > It seems that when most of the rpms that have config files are upgraded,
> > the working config is moved to some *.rpmsave file and the new one is
trying to solve here is that we want
to have a certain portion of rpms automatically updated on a weekly
basis as needed in a more or less hands off fashion, but if the upgrade
means that the services break because the running config is moved aside,
then that's not possible. Any comments?
--
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 08:46 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > There was another little glitch with the provides line. Somehow, based
> > on what it previously had in the provides the build tools showed the
> > follo
getting the "postgresql-" from, but I
changed the provides to just be postgresql and postgresql7. That seemed
to resolve that issue as well.
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 14:16 -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
> I had a dependency issue for some reason regarding installing
> postgresql7 from curr
hould be a suitable fix. This fix
does resolve the issue I was seeing and now the upgrade is moving along
fine. I uploaded the new revised spec file for this.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:39:05PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
> >
> > > Haha. I was wondering about that when I was doing it. Ok, well, here
> > > is the debug from the -a -U then. However, it still seemed to have an
> > > issue.
> >
> >
g from the -a -U then. However, it still seemed to have an
issue.
>
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
debug_output-a.tar.bz2
Description: application/bzip-compressed-tar
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 11:40 -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
> > Can you verify that 'openpkg build -u -A' doesn't show
> > the same pecularities ?
>
> I'm running this now. I will let you know when it finishes. Thanks.
I attached the output for the -u -A ru
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 23:45 +0100, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:04:48PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > > > openssl-0.9.7e-2.3.0UPDATE openssl-0.9.7e-2.3.1
>
> > > So what is 'initially' ? How did you install
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 22:35 +0100, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:13:42AM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
> > I'm working on building a new binary repository out of the latest 2.3
> > release, but I'm coming across an issue with openssl. When I do an
r with
the 2.1 release as well. Is anybody aware of this problem? Has anybody
else seen this? It seems to be only on Solaris because we build under
RHEL3 and I don't have the same problem there.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
s
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 07:41 +0100, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 05:22:21PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> David,
>
> > Also, I still might have to
> > maintain that none of the rpms should ever do a restart on their own.
> > This should be a
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 14:08 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005, Michael van Elst wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 12:18:03PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
> >
> >David,
> >
> >> Restarting AMD while it is in use is a serious problem.
> >
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 21:56 +0100, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 12:18:03PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> David,
>
> > Restarting AMD while it is in use is a serious problem.
>
> restarting AMD is usually not a problem. You should use
> the r
that it probably should be fixed in UPD
for the current release (after testing of course), but that's just my
opinion and the rollout philosophy may differ for you guys. Anyway, I
just wanted to send an email to explain the update. Thanks.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrato
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 09:17 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > Something seems wrong with how Expect and Tcl interacts in regards to
> > dependencies. The problem occurs if you have a prior version of Tcl and
> > Expe
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 13:25 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
> >Something seems wrong with how Expect and Tcl interacts in regards to
> >dependencies. The problem occurs if you have a prior version of Tcl and
> >Expect installed, then
ic version as that
seems that it would logically function as is needed and not break
updating from an older version to newer as well. Does this logic seem
proper to you guys?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Descriptio
. I
uploaded the updated spec file as well.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
; >
> > Nothing on ftp.openpkg.org yet?
>
> -> ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.3/
>
> What's the matter?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 21:51 +0100, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > We should they conflict? In our environment we actually have specific
> > need to run both versions. We cannot have both installed however due to
> > as far
conflicting man page and rename the logrotate to logrotate2
thus following the pattern already defined.
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 08:45 +0100, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> All said.
>
>(mk)
>
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
s
I'm thinking that this thread should be forwarded to the dev list. Do
you have any input?
Forwarded Message
From: David M. Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: openpkg-users@openpkg.org
To: openpkg-users@openpkg.org
Subject: Re: OpenPKG Dependency Loop?
Date: Thu,
it is released. I'm trying to submit all of our spec files and bugs
that we have come across in hopes they will be addressed in the 2.3
release. Thanks.
Forwarded Message ----
From: David M. Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: openpkg-users@openpkg.org
To: openpkg-users@ope
gs, Our Responsibility.
== The Samba Team
==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBwXzZIR7qMdg1EfYRAqv1AJ9FqoFnBPnjNMGVjlsjO47yAk/UYACg9KMa
L+VEkr69J9oGg48m771bC7U=
=gtGA
-END PGP SIGNATURE
004 at 02:13:48PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > and force install the resulting binary rpm. I received this error
> > message when initially trying:
> >
> > "FATAL: errors occured while building:
> > postgresql-7.4.3-2.1.0: postgresql has conflicting r
e resolve
this issue because currently it is a major stopping block as the client
systems aren't getting their updates automagically as they should due to
this error?
Thank you.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Descrip
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 13:06, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:22:04AM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > host/hr_storage.c: In function `sol_get_swapinfo':
> > host/hr_storage.c:845: error: storage size of 'ainfo' isn't known
>
I tried with the snmp srpm out of current and got the same results.
This is on a Solaris 9 Sparc system with the latest patch cluster.
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 07:22, David M. Fetter wrote:
> Ok, I'm getting this build error now when I manually try to build snmp
> with the follow
tifier is
reported only once
host/hr_storage.c:847: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[2]: *** [host/hr_storage.lo] Error 1
make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
make: *** [subdirs] Error 1
Anybody know what the issue is or how to resolve it? Thanks.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Adminis
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 11:29, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
> I've taken it over but tried to simplify and cleanup a few parts.
> Especially the with_man option I've removed (we always install manual
> pages in OpenPKG) and y
rejected. I attached the rc script to this email in case
anyone wants it.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
#!/usr/local/lib/openpkg/bash /usr/local/etc/rc
##
## rc.j2s
I attached the rc scripts for tomcat5 and lprng here in case anybody
wants them, since I could upload them to the contrib area or the
src.rpms which contained them.
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 12:26, David M. Fetter wrote:
> Well, I tried to upload the src rpms for lprng and tomcat5 but they w
1 at 11:56, David M. Fetter wrote:
> I also uploaded an lprng src rpm which includes and rc script and the
> ifhp spec file.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
I also uploaded an lprng src rpm which includes and rc script and the
ifhp spec file.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
signature.asc
Description: This is a
I uploaded a tomcat5 src rpm to the contrib area. It includes an rc
script for it.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
27;t this working? Is there a better way to do this? I was simply
removing the software but that caused another little problem so I'm
trying to work things out with this method. Anybody have any ideas?
Thanks.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.
I created a swatch spec file and uploaded to the contrib/00UPLOAD/
area. Is this the proper place to upload these contributions?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impos
Looks like our mail system cut out my shell script based on it's
extension. I gzip'ed it instead here.
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 10:03, David M. Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 22:27, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > > Shouldn't the newer version of the softwa
impression that this wouldn't work
either and it would instead be confused by the two different versions.
I attached the script I'm using to do this work for you to look at. It
should explain in detail what's going on. Please correct me if I'm
mistaken in any of these
x27;t the newer version of the software and the openpkg revision
make it so they don't want to be updated?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
signature.asc
De
Nevermind. Figured it out. I had to install pam-devel and that solved
the problem. This should probably be added as one of the additional
packages to install on
http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile?f=openpkg-re/osprereq.txt under RHEL3.
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 08:31, David M. Fetter wrote:
> W
am src rpm? The output of the error is attached.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
Installing OpenPKG-2.1/SRC/pam-0-2.1.0.src.rpm
Executing(%prep): env -i /usr/lo
e indexing? I can provide
more detail if you like.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ns of unix
that openpkg is designed for, but it does seem to do the trick for
RHEL3.
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 14:25, David M. Fetter wrote:
> So, in desperation I decided to try and rebuild as many of the packages
> as possible. To do this I started by excluding gettext then things that
d whether or not it is in fact
still necessary? Any thoughts?
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 13:43, David M. Fetter wrote:
> One of my co-workers here discovered that something may be missing from
> the make file in the source tree distributed with the openpkg src rpm.
> See here:
>
> could be
-2.1.0
I don't know if you want to know about these or not. If not just let me
know and I won't send them anymore. If you appreciate the bug reports
then I'll keep sending them. Either way let me know.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University -
, 2004-08-03 at 09:06, David M. Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 04:37, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
> >
> > Dear David,
> > this issue is really the hunt for the living dead. I remember we faught
> > against it in th
-2.1.0 conflicts with file from package texinfo-4.7-2.1.0
Just thought I'd mention it.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
signature.asc
Description: This
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 04:37, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> Dear David,
> this issue is really the hunt for the living dead. I remember we faught
> against it in the past and failed. So let's retry.
>
Yes. Those damned livin
s? I can go
into more detail if you need.
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 09:08, David M. Fetter wrote:
> Unfortunately, this didn't work. It does seem that /usr/local/lib is
> not in my library path or ldpath. I added to /etc/ld.so.conf but that
> didn't work still. I added it to th
x27;d share so
the os requirements section could be updated.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
libcharset.so
> file.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Mukund
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David M. Fetter
> Sent: Tue 7/27/2004 3:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Subject:problem rebuilding gettext
Nope. I'm using the latest 2.1 release.
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 07:47, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > I'm getting an error when trying to rebuild gettext on a RHEL3 x86
> > system. It is as follows:
> >
> >
e rebuild is in the attached tarball. Does
anybody know how to resolve this issue?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
gettext_build_logs.tar.gz
Description: a
How does everyone else build a slew of perl modules into src.rpm under
OpenPKG? Is there a tool or something that already exists for doing
this?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
"Only those who attempt the absurd can achiev
wanted to email this to you to get your take in the event it may be
something you want to address or perhaps something we're doing wrong
when calling the script.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State Universi
Before I start hacking out my own spec file I figured I'd ask here to
see if anyone already has an LPRng spec file or src rpm they've put
together. It always makes sense to save time if one can, eh? :-)
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.o
nd try to rebuild it using
it still removes the rpm-tmp.* file so I
can't look at it. It doesn't remove it when I just execute the '-bp'
but that succeeds. The failure is at the '-bc'. Can anyone give me
some assistance please? Thanks in advance.
--
David M. F
93 matches
Mail list logo
