Nexenta Systems initiated, Illumos Project continues its effort...
http://www.illumos.org
A community maintained derivative of the OpenSolaris ON source,
including open source replacements for closed bits, and additional
changes.
All companies who were working with OpenSolaris/Solaris are
Good news for Nexenta and OpenSolaris community in general:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/blog/2010/04/06/bill-moore-joins-nexenta-advisory-board/
Nexenta invites talents and hiring OpenSolaris Kernel/API engineers. If
you are in SF bay area and you think you are qualified, send your resume
by
Meanwhile, Nexenta offers various support options for OpenSolaris-based
NexentaStor:
http://www.nexenta.com/support
This is of course for storage appliances only.
Edward Martinez wrote:
Indeed, the web page with OpenSolaris support
subscription offers dissapeared and is replaced now
with
Just for the sake of completeness, here is how NexentaCore's ON bits can
be re-build using pure Nexenta environment and Debian APT:
http://www.nexenta.org/projects/6/wiki/BuildingOpensolaris
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Vikram Hegde vikram.he...@sun.com wrote:
Hi,
absolutely free and open: http://www.nexenta.org
Nibal wrote:
Is Nexenta free?
No need to get license
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Why not use Nexenta as a Linux client - it is Debian, yet with
OpenSolaris features!
Nibal wrote:
Hi All,
I need your advice :
I’m planning to migrate from windows clients OS to any Linux version, in our
organization :
Current Environment :
Solaris 10 server OS which have Oracle Ebs 10
Take a look on http://www.nexenta.org project. Might be easier for you.
paul richie wrote:
my biggest problem right now is that i can not install anything because i can't use sudo and i cant figer out how to add myself to the sudoers folder or list everything i reed on-line just said to use the
Guys, could someone confirm that this schedule is STILL valid?
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/schedule/
I'm just wondering that because of SXCE drop - what will happen with
bi-weekly schedule and releases?
How community will know about stabilization builds, etc?
Harry,
for enterprises or small businesses I would recommend some supported
solutions such as Nexenta Delorean:
http://www.nexenta.com/delorean
robocopy and rsync transports, backup browser, snapshots, ACLs, VCS,
etc, etc..
Harry Putnam wrote:
Any of you out there that use your opensol
Hi Guys,
trying to analyze this link:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/schedule/
I see the b111 was the last one marked as stabilization build. Do we
have a plan set for the next OpenSolaris stabilization build yet?
If so, is it possible to keep this page updated?
Thank you!
Hi All,
maybe not a big news but still a news for our great OpenSolaris
community and especially those open source developers who developing
this great Debian derivative - NexentaOS.
Read more on Evan Powell's blog:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_mojoItemid=153p=23
Just wanted to share this link as well:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_mojoItemid=153p=15
Unrealistic worst case scenario: OpenSolaris likely will continue its
development on its own. Independent companies will start offering
OpenSolaris support as Nexenta Systems does today
and we know examples when some particular bugs in open source been
addressed years later after they reported. It is all matter of resources
and priorities of course.
Oehnei wrote:
Nexenta can't even put up an image of their distribution that functions, even 4
months after 3 people post about
Great!
uploaded to Nexenta APT now, for NCP2 users just do:
# apt-get install ndmpcopy
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:46 -0800, Ben Rockwood wrote:
Vilas Deshpande, I love you!!! Thank you! I've been needing this badly!
benr.
___
storage-discuss
Hi folks,
you might be interested in what Evan Powell (Nexenta Systems CEO)
blogging about plans on 2009, OpenSolaris and Open Storage movement:
http://www.nexenta.com/blog
and so called community Statement of Policies:
http://www.nexenta.com/community
Enjoy!
(rev 10)
02:05.1 0200: 14e4:1648 (rev 10)
Putting the B85 driver in /kerner/drv/bge and rebooting instantly
returns bge0 back into action. Erast from Nexenta gave me different in
versions of the bge driver between B85 to B100+, and so far we haven't
isolated where it broke
Very interesting development!
I went ahead and setup a domain + site:
http://www.kernelunix.org
If there is an interest - we could extend its content over time.
I like the idea of modular approach to build ON. I do believe that
kernel, libc, networking all could be delivered as separate
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, such port makes sense and solves some of the issues (mostly GNU
libc portability) but unfortunately creates new issues, which I'm sure,
could
to get things like the wifi tools for
FreeBSD working. I'm not saying that adapting glibc is a bad thing,
but we need to figure out if we really want to go down this path.
Michael
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. And in addition to autotools
Hi David,
Great work!
Yes, such port makes sense and solves some of the issues (mostly GNU
libc portability) but unfortunately creates new issues, which I'm sure,
could be worked out and soon we should have more or less working first
ISO available with support for this new exciting architecture!
Anil just published nice article:
http://www.osnews.com/story/20280/Nexenta_Ubuntu_Server_with_ZFS_goodness
The idea is to engage Debian/Ubuntu community and position/create
Nexenta Server 1.0 (Hardy Heron) which will match Ubuntu Server with its
functionality + ZFS/Zones/SMF/COMSTAR goodness on
Hi All,
Hackaton is still in progress!
Here goes short history of events so far:
* NexentaCore 2.0 Alpha2 first 'testing' ISO available - ON b97/b98
based. People reported successful installations, likely we will have
official Alpha2 next week, as usual, upgradable with power of Debian
tools -
I like your blog entry on using graphviz to view Nexenta package
dependencies graphically. Nice!
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 22:49 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
Hi All,
We've setup a blogging infrastructure at http://blogs.nexenta.org. If
you have a Nexenta blog, or want one let us know, and we'll
Hey folks,
just saw another cool news this morning - Nexenta Systems released
documentation for remote API and Windows SDK with demos for accessing
NexentaStor. News itself:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=154Itemid=56
ZFS and the rest of appliance
Hi folks,
wanted to share some exciting news with you. Pogo Linux shipping
NexentaStor pre-installed boxes, like this one 16TB - 24TB:
http://www.pogolinux.com/quotes/editsys?sys_id=3989
And here is announce:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=129Itemid=56
This is to announce availability of NexentaCore 2.0 Alpha1 - Debian
Native OpenSolaris environment and platform. (unstable Hardy branch)
NexentaCore 2.0 Alpha1 Release Highlights:
--
* 3392 packages ported over just two weeks of Hardy Hackathon
This is to announce availability of NexentaCore 1.0.1 - Debian Native
OpenSolaris environment and platform. (stable Elatte branch)
NexentaCore 1.0.1 Release Highlights:
-
* OpenSolaris b85+ based (x86 32-bit and 64-bit, non-debug), with
critical
Hi,
A lot of fun these days and a lot of achievements!
June's Hackathon-in-progress status:
* Debian tools such as: devscripts, dpkg, apt, debarchiver, etc all
ported
* compiled bunch of NCP 2.0 packages (gcc prerequisites)
* newisys-nas.stanford.edu
Dear OpenSolaris Developers and Users!
Starting this Saturday, we are inviting all Debian/OpenSolaris
developers and users to participate in our first Hackathon
event.
Hackathon starts on this Saturday 05/31/2008 and continues during first
week of June. Development coordinated at #nexenta on
Thanks.
FYI, www.nexenta.org website is totally open for editors (except front
page) - login and change the way you like it - its Wiki after all.
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 11:05 -0800, Tim Cook wrote:
Just a request/hint/whatever. Finding the actual download link on that site
is the most
http://linuxtracker.org/index.php?page=torrent-detailsid=8f4a28c436d2dc7f866560fc6ac3a6363c73e310
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:56 -0800, Lucian wrote:
Are There a metalink and bittorrent for download the iso images?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Hi,
This is to announce Nexenta Builder 1.0!
Recently released NexentaCore 1.0 is especially well suited to serve as
a platform for application distributions due to Nexenta Builder 1.0, an
open source packaging solution included as part of NexentaCore that
enables the simple creation of
Nexenta Core Platform (NexentaCP) RC5 is available at:
http://www.nexenta.org
Release highlights:
* Critical bootstrapping issue fixed
* Minor apt-clone fixes
* Minor packaging fixes
Developers and Users - join official Nexenta IRC #nexenta now!
Enjoy!
The Nexenta Team.
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:08 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 12:49 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 12:44 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
Thus, I stand by the claim that Nexenta, at the very least, is a fork.
You deeply mistaken here. As far
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:26 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
...and I never said that wasn't a good thing. I'm just pointing out
that Nexenta is different.
in a good, practical and positive way... :-)
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Nexenta Core Platform (NexentaCP) RC4 is available at:
http://www.nexenta.org
Release highlights:
* OpenSolaris build 82 (non-debug) + critical fixes from b83 [1]:
* Storage consolidation updated with build 82
* More Network drivers (sfe, igb)
* NFS and CIFS server fixes
* Xen Dom0
start your own APT repository and share
it with others. If you are just a user - simply wait till somebody else
will jump in and produce it for you.
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 04:50 -0800, Martti Hamunen wrote:
Erast how can I go on...
1. X-works, but there are messages:...no /root/.xsession
for RC2, switch to unstable, than do:
apt-get install x-window-system-core
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 12:16 -0800, Martti Hamunen wrote:
I try install NexentaCP.
Where is X or how can I get it?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Nexenta Core Platform (NexentaCP) RC3 is available at:
http://www.nexenta.org
Release highlights:
* OpenSolaris build 80+ (non-debug) + critical fixes from b81-b83 [1]:
- critical fixes for native CIFS server
- critical fixes for ZFS
- critical bug fixes for SATA and networking
NCP ships Xorg with foundation libraries only - no GUI applications, no
GNOME, no KDE, no XFCE, no GUI integration...
Complete Desktop-oriented distributions will appear later as a network
of NCP derivatives.
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:18 +0800, Robin du wrote:
On 1/28/08, Erast Benson [EMAIL
Great job Joerg!
wrt. Ubuntu/Nexenta NCP roadmap is here:
http://www.nexenta.org/os/DevelopmentRoadmap
NCP 1.5 will be Hardy-based. Hardy is upcoming next LTS (Long Term
Support) release of Ubuntu repository. In April this year.
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 10:56 -0800, ken mays wrote:
Have you
Hi guys,
new article available explaining details on how enterprise-like upgrades
integrated with Nexenta Core Platform starting from RC2 using ZFS
capabilities and Debian APT:
http://www.nexenta.org/os/TransactionalZFSUpgrades
What is NexentaCP?
NexentaCP is a minimal (core) foundation that
Glad to announce that popular Solaris third-party repository Blastwave
'CSW' now integrated with Nexenta APT.
To enable it on RC2, edit /etc/apt/sources.list like this:
- deb http://apt.nexenta.org elatte-unstable main contrib non-free
+ deb http://apt.nexenta.org elatte-unstable main contrib
non-free csw
And use as you would usually do on normal Debian server:
$ sudo apt-get install cswgdb
Many credits to Nexenta Blastwave Communities for this!
You know, Erast, I was loking at Nexenta yesterday and I wonder if you could
put a download link thing right on the home page
This is great, thanks Dennis!
In our turn, we will continue CSW polishing in Nexenta and maybe one day
will make it default. It still needs fixing on our part, all bugs should
be reported here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nexenta
and discussed on #nexenta IRC channel if time permits.
On Tue,
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 13:33 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
good point. I marked download links with blinking icon..
though, web site is wiki based and features open edit policy for
everyone, so if someone on the list find something on web site which
needs fixing, don't hesitate - fix it!
what about it? (Italian accent)
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 14:21 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Glad to announce that popular Solaris third-party repository Blastwave
'CSW' now integrated with Nexenta APT.
To enable it on RC2, edit /etc/apt/sources.list like this:
- deb http://apt.nexenta.org
Nexenta Core Platform (NexentaCP) RC2 is available at:
http://www.nexenta.org
Release highlights:
* OpenSolaris build 80+ (non-debug)
* Project integration: NWS, AVS, COMSTAR, in-kernel CIFS client
* apt-clone: ZFS-integrated safe upgrade via remote APT repository.
Support for
depends on which OpenSolaris distribution you are talking about..
For Nexenta, you can use Debian APT, its been around for 2+ years now..
Its the only option (as of today). But there is nothing preventing
distro creators to build RPM based OpenSolaris too, so Yum could be
used.
On Sat,
have you disabled samba?
svcadm disable samba
On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 22:39 -0800, MC wrote:
2) Unstable APT integrated with ON build 79, give it
a try!
I tried svcadm enable -r smb/server from
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/cifs-server/gettingstarted.html in
nexentacp and it didn't
:
Il Wednesday 19 December 2007 23:57:07 Erast Benson ha scritto:
Hi All,
This is the road to NCP 1.0...
Our motto:
Ubuntu makes best Debian Desktop platform - Nexenta makes best
Debian Server/Storage platform.
Some latest Nexenta related news:
1) Official Nexenta Core Platform
Hi All,
This is the road to NCP 1.0...
Our motto:
Ubuntu makes best Debian Desktop platform - Nexenta makes best Debian
Server/Storage platform.
Some latest Nexenta related news:
1) Official Nexenta Core Platform (NCP) repository now is
http://apt.nexenta.org
2) Unstable APT integrated with
http://www.gnusolaris.org/unstable-iso/ncp_beta1-test3-b68_i386.iso
Changes:
* ON b68 based
* man pages updated
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
impressive
is there a way to transform Sun package to a synaptic package?
selim
On 6/22/07, Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Erast Benson wrote:
New unstable ISO of NexentaCP (Core Platform) available.
http://www.gnusolaris.org/unstable-iso/ncp_beta1-test2
/var/lib/apt/*
$ sudo apt-get update
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
?
Incremental ON/NWS upgrades have been provided started from A5+.. i.e. a
year ago. However, on you own risk. This is Alpha software, but
technology is there.
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Parallels...
What is Parallels?
VMWare-like software for MacOSX
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Erast
___
opensolaris
ZFS/Boot type of installations
on single disk or 2+ mirror configuration. For now, only Auto
partitioning mode could be used for ZFS root partition creation.
More details on NexentaCP will be available soon...
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:26 -0400, Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:51:08PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
More details on NexentaCP will be available soon...
Is it based on Alpha7?
Alpha7 is the Desktop-oriented ISO, however they share the same main APT
repository, i.e
,
Moinak.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
Why did other people create _different_ distributions?
Same reason. Because Debian-based GNU/OpenSolaris never existed before.
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
any other vendor can offer support independently from
Sun?
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
yours,
Rick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:32 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 16/05/07, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 22:37 +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
One problem I have is that whenever corporate gets their minds around
products, they start to associate revenue streams
- can't they drive that?
Erast and Alex have a clear (and valuable) alternate userland and
packaging system.
And I haven't even considered Dennis, and the pkgsource people. And
while we have GNU-ish stuff, what about BSD?
These areas seem to me somewhat orthogonal.
I can
on
project emancipation. Jump start it... It would also make sense if Sun
would help Google to pay some $$$ to the students involved...
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
3 little demos by Martin Man. Available as of today.
http://martinman.net/software/nexenta
Thanks Martin.
Enjoy!
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
* Device probing is still incomplete.
Regards,
Nikhil Vyakaranam,
Sujay Patil,
Srivatsa V,
Nitin Shekhar
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Erast
ON/NWS build 61 is now available for your regular APT upgrades.
To upgrade your Alpha 6 NexentaOS box do:
a) Switch your /etc/apt/sources.list to elatte-unstable.
d) Do upgrade:
# apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade
# reboot
Enjoy!
--
Erast
suppose to do that auto magically..
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
:
Isn't that Nexenta?
Note the Nexenta project is by all rights and intentions (Erast, correct me
if I'm wrong) a project of and by the OpenSolaris community.
Yes, its entierly driven by the Community developers and users who
generates bug reports... We just trying to coordinate the effort
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 12:22 -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Erast Benson wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 08:18 -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
But that just brings us back to Joe's original point:
Isn't that Nexenta?
Note the Nexenta project is by all rights
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 16:38 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Really .. its so great to see Mr. Debian here. :-)
+1 :-)
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 21:25 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I would like to see OpenSolaris buildable on OpenSolaris.
This needs that some more pieces of code need to be at least
redistributable.
+1
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
will be closed:
http://www.gnusolaris.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedmilestone=Elatte+Unstable+Beta+1
This really depends on capabilities of our community.
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
is a distribution of Sun Microsystem, only Sun can decide to go
with GNU userland.
On the other hand, we already have GNU/OpenSolaris NexentaOS:
http://www.gnusolaris.org
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
on cloning it) but in many cases we
can't even tell why we can't open the source.
This is a great idea, this way we could avoid double efforts.
Lawyers are funny that way.
no, that is fine.
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
the best we can do.
I will put it on my list to update the page listed above now that an
open source version of e1000g is available.
Bonnie
Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 16:53 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what's most frustrating about the closed_bins
/unsubscribed during certain period? Number of downloads may
be?
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 09:55 -0800, John Plocher wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
I didn't say we are dead community. :-) And I said almost zero
participation from outside of Sun
What are your expectations here? That at some point
unfortunately, I do not see up-and-to-the-right type of numbers,
but at least numbers are steady, this gives me more hopes that it is not
to late to fix that if at all possible/needed.
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 19:28 +, Peter Tribble wrote:
On 2/1/07, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
community's input
but also will stimulate outsiders to commit more often.
This would also help outsiders to understand ON code and will create
certain discipline among developers.
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
all moving slower than I want, but it's moving. There's a lot of
infrastructure required to do all of this, and we're bumping into some
issues. (Ask Stephen Lau about the automounter sometime. :-)) But,
what you ask will happen.
Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 15:40 -0800
delay, but ultimately I'd like for closed bins to
disappear completely.
+1
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thank you.
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
I think GPLv3 will be widely accepted just because of FSF/GNU will force
it in distributions and because of GPLv2 or later clause in source
files.
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
we don't have problems with our community, think
again please. But I believe if GPLv3 dual-licensing is done right, it
will improve this situation drastically.
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 18:28 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:57 -0800, John Plocher wrote:
As Dennis, Casper and others have said: What is the problem that
dual licensing is trying to solve?
one little problem... to become a major OSS
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 18:38 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:57 -0800, John Plocher wrote:
As Dennis, Casper and others have said: What is the problem that
dual licensing is trying to solve?
one little problem... to become a major OSS
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 10:42 -0800, Rich Teer wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Erast Benson wrote:
it to happen? None or one! And I bet Sun would like to increase outside
contribution too but with CDDL alone it is just not possible in
foreseeable future. People afraid to contribute to CDDL
.
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 11:32 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
I agree, re-licensing alone will not cure us entirely but will help
dramatically. Its a combination of steps. 1) Re-licensing, 2) get rid of
Contributor Agreement, 3) get rid of closed bins.
But if we get rid
guess when you haven't seen the final GPLv3 license.
But we can make somewhat an educated guess now based on what we do
know. And we can always revise it as we obtain more data.
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:57 -0800, John Plocher wrote
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 00:24 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:57 -0800, John Plocher wrote:
As Dennis, Casper and others have said: What is the problem that
dual licensing is trying to solve?
one little problem... to become
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 16:14 -0800, Shawn Walker wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 18:28 +, Darren J Moffat
wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:57 -0800, John Plocher
wrote:
As Dennis, Casper and others have said: What is
the problem that
dual licensing
community, it doesn't make us a
*dead* community.
I didn't say we are dead community. :-) And I said almost zero
participation from outside of Sun which is what currently our relative
numbers are by looking at ON consolidation. And yes, we are growing, but
not fast enough to me...
--
Erast
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 13:19 +0900, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Alan Burlison wrote On 02/01/07 09:11,:
Erast Benson wrote:
Isn't the fact that after almost 2 years of existence we still
considered a minority community with almost zero participation from the
outside not a proof
only version.
whatever it proves, it wasn't a good experience...
And if I'm not mistaken Joerg refused to dual-license cdrecord.
--
Erast
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
