I'm still waiting... :-(
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- Dan Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks. Today marks the release of Solaris
Express 8/2005. As
usual, you can fetch it via
http://www.sun.com/solaris-express.
Below is my newsletter about the release. Thanks to
Alan C., Darren,
Mark Nelson,
Richard M. Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be too much to kindly ask the FSF to consider amending the
GPL (in light of the forthcoming GPL V3) to allow compatibility with
other open source licenses which may not be GPL derivatives, but are
otherwise considered
--- Dan Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks. Today marks the release of Solaris
Express 8/2005. As
usual, you can fetch it via
http://www.sun.com/solaris-express.
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
a few people seem to have got theirs, but I haven't got mine either if that
makes you feel any better! :)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello,
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 23:43, Matt Sealey wrote:
A silly question, does anyone have any photographs of an old SPARC or m68k
workstation booting with it's cool, black-on-white firmware prompt?
I've got an old 3/60 (yes, it has a 68020 CPU) with the original b/w monitor
and I can take
On 8/23/05, Peter Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still waiting... :-(
So am I, you're not alone :)
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
But getting back to the main point: I don't think we're ever going
to agree on SW licensing philosophy, but I don't think there's any
way that OpenSolaris can be icensed under the GPL. The need and/or
desire to link with 3rd party code that may or may not be open source
On 8/17/05, Marilyn Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We plan to push development for the Solaris Companion out into the community,
to serve as a test case for community development for other areas of Solaris.
The Companion is the supplemental collection of open source software
distributed
On 8/23/05, James Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry this is opensolaris, and not the ON distrobution, sun doesn't
have the right to pick the gate keeper of a community without a
discussion on the subjec and possibly a vote, this seems very
underhanded. I value sun choices for my OS, but
Thanks to all for the warm welcome. I'm still getting caught up on
the complete contents of the program's to do list, but am always
ready to hear about blocking issues, be they to do with released
source, site and tools infrastructure, new systems ideas, or even
random
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
It occurs to me that the term gatekeeper is really more from Sun's
teamware source control legacy and could carry a negative connotation to
someone in the community who is not (or only loosely) familiar with the
term.
I've never worked in a consolidation with a formal
James Dickens wrote:
sorry this is opensolaris, and not the ON distrobution, sun doesn't
have the right to pick the gate keeper of a community without a
discussion on the subjec and possibly a vote, this seems very
underhanded. I value sun choices for my OS, but I have found sun's
choices for
On Tue 23 Aug 2005 at 05:53AM, ken mays wrote:
I followed yor link (and off of the main Sun homepage) and pulled down
SX 08/05 NVb20 - not NVb19. Was there a last minute change, and whatis
the difference between NVb19 and NVb20 for Solaris Express?
I think it's possible that either the D/L
Hi James,
James Dickens wrote:
(snip...)
As long as its numbers are being padded by downloads that are on the
main solaris 10 download page, it will appear to be alive. I did a
quick poll in #solaris and #opensolaris, and got 2 responders that
say they actually use the freeware companion
On 8/23/05, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
It occurs to me that the term gatekeeper is really more from Sun's
teamware source control legacy and could carry a negative connotation to
someone in the community who is not (or only loosely) familiar with the
Hi James,
Stephen Lau wrote:
James Dickens wrote:
sorry this is opensolaris, and not the ON distrobution, sun doesn't
have the right to pick the "gate keeper" of a community without a
discussion on the subjec and possibly a vote, this seems very
underhanded. I value sun choices
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:38:01PM -0700, David McDaniel (damcdani) wrote:
Thanks Jonathon. Your description of the lifecycle of a buffer made
perfect sense. That kind of info would help if it got into the man page.
I'll work on getting the manpage updated.
I'm still not sure I understand
I haven't seen CAB meeting notes since the 6/15/05 meeting.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/cab/cab_meeting_notes/2005/cab_meeting_notes_20050615/
Whats the current arrangement for CAB meetings?
benr.
PS: The Discussions link on the CAB page
James Dickens wrote:
this isn't about grunt work, its about who controls the gate, and sun
endorsing this person and his project above the rest of the others.
This sounds more like a glossary cache miss than evidence of a conspiracy.
The role of a gatekeeper is very different in the FOSS and
Ben Rockwood wrote:
I haven't seen CAB meeting notes since the 6/15/05 meeting.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/cab/cab_meeting_notes/2005/cab_meeting_notes_20050615/
Whats the current arrangement for CAB meetings?
benr.
The CAB has conference call meetings only to resolve issues
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Ben Rockwood wrote:
I haven't seen CAB meeting notes since the 6/15/05 meeting.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/cab/cab_meeting_notes/2005/cab_meeting_notes_20050615/
Hmm. We should rectify that, even if it is to post the notes from
our meetings at OSCON.
Whats
Because there are countless people outside Sun with expertise in
building and maintaining open-source software, enabling a way for
non-Sun people to contribute to the Companion CD probably should have
happened _a long_ time ago. Nevertheless, I think the Companion CD
concept still has merit. There
Rich Teer wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Ben Rockwood wrote:
I haven't seen CAB meeting notes since the 6/15/05 meeting.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/cab/cab_meeting_notes/2005/cab_meeting_notes_20050615/
Hmm. We should rectify that, even if it is to post the notes from
our
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Rich Teer wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Ben Rockwood wrote:
I haven't seen CAB meeting notes since the 6/15/05 meeting.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/cab/cab_meeting_notes/2005/cab_meeting_notes_20050615/
Hmm. We should rectify that, even if it is to
Ben Rockwood wrote:
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Rich Teer wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Ben Rockwood wrote:
I haven't seen CAB meeting notes since the 6/15/05 meeting.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/cab/cab_meeting_notes/2005/cab_meeting_notes_20050615/
Hmm. We should rectify
PS: The Discussions link on the CAB page
(http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/cab/) points to the tools
discussion, not cab-discuss.
This is fixed.
Thanks for the heads up.
Derek
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
How were those to US destinations shipped (USPS, UPS, whatever)? Knowing that
might help some of us know what to watch for.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
| Nevertheless, I think the Companion CD concept still has merit. There
| are lots of customers who have a strong desire for any unsupported
| open-source software they might use to come from the same vendor that
| they purchased their platform/service contract from.
I'd word this slightly
James Dickens wrote:
this isn't about grunt work, its about who controls
the gate, and sun
endorsing this person and his project above the
rest of the others.
This sounds more like a glossary cache miss than
evidence of a conspiracy.
The role of a gatekeeper is very different in the
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Hugh McIntyre wrote:
| Nevertheless, I think the Companion CD concept still has merit. There
| are lots of customers who have a strong desire for any unsupported
| open-source software they might use to come from the same vendor that
| they purchased their
31 matches
Mail list logo
