Erast Benson wrote:
Also putting too much in OSOL LCD(OpenSolaris least common denominator)
will break distribution's individuality. So, please lets be careful
here.
Then maybe there needs to be another distribution. Solaris LCD. Or
maybe, when installing software, you would check for common
Stefan Teleman wrote:
On 11/21/05, Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snipped...]
Right. But ultimately if we want to really work together, it would be nice if
we had a common set of libraries that everyone could use, and so that we
shouldn't have so many sets of libs floating around our
On 11/21/05, Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 21 November 2005 06:37 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> > > This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
> > > Solaris/OpenSolaris. Blastwave, pkgsrc, (I suspect) gentoo,
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 00:29 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 21 November 2005 06:37 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> > > > This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
> > > > So
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 15:23, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> On Monday 21 November 2005 06:37 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> > > This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
> > > Solaris/OpenSolaris. Blastwave, pkgsrc, (I suspect) gentoo, sunf
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 21 November 2005 10:25 am, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> > With this in mind, I'm thinking maybe SchilliX, Nexenta, and JDS won't
> > suffer from the problem Alan sites above...?
>
> The key will be in getting the core libs into a common location. The m
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 21 November 2005 06:37 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> > > This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
> > > Solaris/OpenSolaris. Blastwave, pkgsrc, (I suspect) gentoo, sunfreeware,
On Monday 21 November 2005 10:25 am, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> With this in mind, I'm thinking maybe SchilliX, Nexenta, and JDS won't
> suffer from the problem Alan sites above...?
The key will be in getting the core libs into a common location. The more that
is built, the more libs are required, w
On Monday 21 November 2005 06:37 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> > This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
> > Solaris/OpenSolaris. Blastwave, pkgsrc, (I suspect) gentoo, sunfreeware,
> > etc...all build their own userland. GNU/Ope
On 11/21/05, Patrick Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 16:08, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > A build system is being worked on that results in scripts and diffs
> > being available also.
> good to know!
>
> > As for not being "open". Just join. You can shell account and look
>
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 16:08, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> A build system is being worked on that results in scripts and diffs
> being available also.
good to know!
> As for not being "open". Just join. You can shell account and look
> around. How "closed" is that?
the "just join" part is what makes i
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> On Thursday 17 November 2005 05:58 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
>> As for why not using pkgsrc, there are many things to consider: eg. that
>> pkgsrc builds basically your whole userland again (at least the large
>> chunks: yet another perl installation, yet
On 11/21/05, Patrick Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> > This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
> > Solaris/OpenSolaris. Blastwave, pkgsrc, (I suspect) gentoo, sunfreeware,
> > etc...all build their own userland. GNU/OpenSol
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:50, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> This is currently a problem with all of the distributions on
> Solaris/OpenSolaris. Blastwave, pkgsrc, (I suspect) gentoo, sunfreeware,
> etc...all build their own userland. GNU/OpenSolaris does the same in it's own
> way.
this is why I built my
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Another differentiator that I think is important is which ones
are/aren't leveraging the OpenSolaris community. From what I can tell,
pkgsrc and OpenPKG are not, and Nexenta, SchilliX, and JDS are.
I am having pleasant thoughts of a marriage between portage and pkgbuild
(
Roberto Pereyra wrote:
Hi
An option that I believe that it has not been considered in the news
distributions based on Opensolaris is to use the system of packages of
called NetBSD pkgsrc.
http://www.pkgsrc.org/
http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/pkgsrc/platforms.html#solaris
Pkgsrc support
On Thursday 17 November 2005 05:58 am, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
> As for why not using pkgsrc, there are many things to consider: eg. that
> pkgsrc builds basically your whole userland again (at least the large
> chunks: yet another perl installation, yet another python, ..)
This is currently a prob
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 14:23, Roberto Pereyra wrote:
> Why not use it?
there are people using it.
As for the GPL requirement, I assume you refer to the debian based
distro. It seems, they want to have a debian-style distro, and pkgsrc
won't help them in any way.
As for why not using pkgsrc, there
Hi
An option that I believe that it has not been considered in the news
distributions based on Opensolaris is to use the system of packages of
called NetBSD pkgsrc.
http://www.pkgsrc.org/
http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/pkgsrc/platforms.html#solaris
Pkgsrc support Solaris well and use stand
19 matches
Mail list logo