Re: [opensource-dev] Upcoming depth-of-field feature

2010-11-25 Thread Rob Nelson
Oh good, let's add more features instead of either optimizing things or fixing things. Rob On 11/25/2010 8:56 AM, Opensource Obscure wrote: > Thanks to BlakOpal today I saw these very cool images: > http://twitpic.com/3a0vag/full > > http://picasaweb.google.com/Runitai/DeferredRendering#s

Re: [opensource-dev] Dynamic shadows and ATI

2010-11-13 Thread Rob Nelson
You're better off getting a new card, since the card doesn't support dynamic shadows, not the other way around. Rob On 11/13/2010 3:35 AM, Laurent Bechir wrote: > Hello, > > Anyone can tell me when Dynamic shadows will support ATI card, please ? > I'm actually wondering what is the best if I wan

Re: [opensource-dev] Today's new Beta Viewer

2010-11-04 Thread Rob Nelson
Most of the stuff included are probably minor UI fixes (low resolution screws up layout, for example) and crash fixes. I haven't read the changelog yet, though, so I don't really know. Rob On 11/4/2010 3:55 AM, Hitomi Tiponi wrote: Is there a reason why 213435 seems identical to last week's 2

Re: [opensource-dev] constant crashes

2010-11-03 Thread Rob Nelson
Too late for that. Your username doesn't look to be too damaging anyway, and the password to your account isn't uploaded with the log. If you don't feel like exposing your account, just create an account along the lines of JIRATest with some random last name. Or, even better, hook up an

Re: [opensource-dev] texture preview pane

2010-11-01 Thread Rob Nelson
Uh, try increasing your resolution? I can't see how anyone can realistically use the UI when it's crunched down to that size. On 11/1/2010 1:54 PM, Erin Mallory wrote: okay, not sure exactly when or how this broke, but I only noticed this today and this makes texture previewing and sorting very

Re: [opensource-dev] display name userstory

2010-10-30 Thread Rob Nelson
How about "username (Loading...)", in order to queue people in as to why their display names aren't showing up. Should relieve pressure on support staff. Rob On 10/29/2010 8:47 PM, Erin Mallory wrote: as a user, if there are network issues in SL I would like display name enabled clients to N

Re: [opensource-dev] Stuff I'd like to see in the coming sprint

2010-10-19 Thread Rob Nelson
As an epileptic, I agree. Thank God for Keppra (and the ability to still go back to Snowglobe 1.x). Rob On 10/19/2010 7:24 AM, Erin Mallory wrote: I'd also like to see some of the siezure causing issues addressed (like disabling toasts). ___ Poli

Re: [opensource-dev] Fermi Viewer

2010-10-18 Thread Rob Nelson
Just spit out what you want, some of us are bored enough to add it to our viewers. Rob On 10/18/2010 4:08 AM, Arthur Fermi wrote: > I am liking that idea :) the catch for us, is we have zero skills in house > for a viewer. We can build datacenters, large database projects, program in > Perl,

Re: [opensource-dev] Again About Scripting Issues specifically KELLY LINDEN

2010-10-17 Thread Rob Nelson
There is no "we". The servers are proprietary; LL does this on their own dime and time. From what I gather, there's a little bit of work going towards that direction, but the mesh changes have their attention for now, like car keys dangled in front of a toddler. Rob On 10/17/2010 12:40 PM,

Re: [opensource-dev] O.O Display name code DROP!

2010-10-17 Thread Rob Nelson
This. Say Joe Everyguy wants to look for a rather hot conversation he had with what he assumes was a very attractive-looking female yesterday. With a text logfile, he just has to open the log in notepad and CTRL+F for "VerySexy Lady". Since that was her display name at the time, it's inclu

Re: [opensource-dev] O.O Display name code DROP!

2010-10-15 Thread Rob Nelson
I CONTRIBUTED SOMETHING ;_; Rob On 10/15/2010 4:23 PM, Leyla Linden wrote: The only difference is that they'll include both display names and usernames, much like Rob Nelson suggested. - Leyla ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information avai

Re: [opensource-dev] O.O Display name code DROP!

2010-10-15 Thread Rob Nelson
On 10/15/2010 2:04 AM, Lance Corrimal wrote: > Am Freitag, 15. Oktober 2010, 10:00:44 schrieb Rob Nelson: >>So basically, LL decided to go from simply changing the formatting of >> their logs to (if what I am hearing is correct), of all things, LLSD XML >> notatio

Re: [opensource-dev] O.O Display name code DROP!

2010-10-15 Thread Rob Nelson
So basically, LL decided to go from simply changing the formatting of their logs to (if what I am hearing is correct), of all things, LLSD XML notation, possibly the worst formatting of log possible? Has ANYONE over there at LL looked at the sheer amount of overhead LLSD produces? We'll have

Re: [opensource-dev] Where oh where has my rendering gone?

2010-10-07 Thread Rob Nelson
By the way, what happened to the rest of windlight that was supposed to be implemented? The volumetric clouds, server-side settings sharing, etc? Is it possible for a dev to get approval to release the viewer-side half-implemented versions of those so the community can finish them up? Rob

Re: [opensource-dev] How is the XUI part of the interface designed?

2010-10-06 Thread Rob Nelson
There's a GUI editor, but last I checked, only LL employees and a select few really know how to use it; The manual is still in some LL wiki somewhere. Rob On 10/6/2010 3:56 PM, SuezanneC Baskerville wrote: There's a bunch of xml files in the Second Life program folder, for one example, floa

[opensource-dev] Debugging SLPlugin(s)

2010-09-26 Thread Rob Nelson
Here's another probable stupid question for you all. During viewer startup in Snowglobe 1.5, I get spammed with "plugin_* has crashed etc etc, please restart etc etc". I'd like to figure out why this is happening. Unfortunately, all I'm getting from the SecondLife.log is that the APR connec

Re: [opensource-dev] Third Party Plug-ins?

2010-09-24 Thread Rob Nelson
ngerous packets to the network. I've also placed a policy on viewer development where access to economic functions must be approved by the user (via a warning dialog or a settings checkbox), and TPV policies (such as checking for creator permissions before accessing an object) have also bee

Re: [opensource-dev] off the wall idea of the day

2010-09-23 Thread Rob Nelson
You could always have a cheesy minigame where you play a breakout clone to get your avatar past a firewall to get to one of the servers. Which then explodes. On 9/23/2010 6:41 PM, Ponzu wrote: Remember when at the keynote Philip said that Second Life should be "fun" like the iPhone is fun? I

[opensource-dev] Compiling Snowglobe

2010-09-14 Thread Rob Nelson
So I've got a recent-ish snowglobe source tree on Windows 7. It compiles fine on Linux. However, on Windows it's a hellish nightmare, and the wiki might as well be talking about compiling 1.23. I've asked 3 separate IRC channels with few positive results. My current problem is with the lib

Re: [opensource-dev] where is the source

2010-09-13 Thread Rob Nelson
As I recall, all that lscript stuff was to compile the LSL bytecode and give it to the server. It shouldn't be needed anymore since the server compiles everything itself... Rob On 9/13/2010 4:32 PM, Kelly Linden wrote: I'd love to see that syntax highlighting and hover tip code replaced, we

Re: [opensource-dev] The Plan for Snowglobe

2010-09-10 Thread Rob Nelson
in my Lua engine, and I'm out of my "coder's block". Rob Nelson On 9/10/2010 4:27 PM, dilly dobbs wrote: I would like to know 2 things, as an observer. You continue to make statements like 'TPV developers' as if you speak for them all. Secondly, I distinctly r

Re: [opensource-dev] This is how Linden Lab treats it's customers...

2010-08-28 Thread Rob Nelson
And what venues can we use? The forums are almost as heavily moderated as the mailing list, half of the time the blogs don't even allow you to comment. I'd like to see a site moderated by a third party that won't delete your account or add a moderation flag to your account just for talking

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-24 Thread Rob Nelson
erely changed the encryption method used when it was discovered. I don't even know if they changed their KDU library to comply yet, or if they're covering their bums still by making a storm of apologetic blog posts while continuing the same old crap. Rob Nelson On 8/24/2010 1:50 P

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-22 Thread Rob Nelson
(Replied offlist by accident.) Funny how you allow Phox and crew to continue operating after they purposefully leak info and attack a website, and then you ban me for running a freakin' rental company to help pay a friend's bills. Get your priorities straight and either enforce ALL of your ru

Re: [opensource-dev] the last press release...

2010-06-10 Thread Rob Nelson
Babbage was apparently let go as well. Goodbye to C# scripting. Rob On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:16 -0400, Gigs wrote: > Apparently Zero has been fired as well? I guess that means interop and > all the standards stuff is dead. > ___ > Policies and (un)sub

Re: [opensource-dev] Mesh rendering: What does indicesp provide?

2010-06-03 Thread Rob Nelson
It may be quite fast, but I don't think it's GPL, so I can't really use it. I'll have to come up with my own MacGyver'd implementation of LOD and stitching after I finish the initial implementation. Rob On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 11:42 -0500, Jonathan Goodman wrote: > It may be a bit late for this, bu

Re: [opensource-dev] Mesh rendering: What does indicesp provide?

2010-06-03 Thread Rob Nelson
ate mode, which is both slow, and undesired. You will have to do > some research into using proper vertex buffers to properly convert the > code. > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 19:35, Rob Nelson > wrote: > I am almost to the point of going crazy. I was going to write >

[opensource-dev] Mesh rendering: What does indicesp provide?

2010-06-02 Thread Rob Nelson
I am almost to the point of going crazy. I was going to write a notecard to a Linden, but I've been knocked out of SL for reasons unknown, so I'll have to ask here. In my infinite lack of wisdom, I decided to start working on a project where I replace the heightmap terrain in Second Life with one

Re: [opensource-dev] Migrating open development focus to 2.x

2010-05-27 Thread Rob Nelson
I think the multitude of polls on the subject makes it clear that many, many people just hate the UI but would be perfectly fine back-porting some of the features (web-on-a-prim, tattoos, etc) to 1.x. In fact, when I last used 2.0, I got what we epileptics call an "aura", which is a warning sign

Re: [opensource-dev] [POLICY] Configurable HTTP user-agent string

2010-05-04 Thread Rob Nelson
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 20:48 -0300, Tigro Spottystripes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Is the internal browser considered the viewer itself or can it have it's > own identifier? >From what I remember, it uses something like Second Life Viewer/VERSION (Mozilla 4.0...

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

2010-05-02 Thread Rob Nelson
The only way to reliably detect a client is if the client sends an MD5 hash of the executable to the login server, and that function was removed ages ago from the login process due to ease of spoofing. Requiring a unique login channel requires manual intervention to change the login channel from t

Re: [opensource-dev] Oh, the drama. (was: Viewer blacklist...)

2010-04-30 Thread Rob Nelson
As a person who is trying to patch (a now rather old version) of OpenSim to handle voxel terrain, there's MANY, MANY flaws to the messaging subsystem of both the viewer and the server. For one, I wanted to tack on an additional UDP/TCP message to handle voxelmap transmissions and modification.

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer blacklist to replace the TPV directory ?

2010-04-29 Thread Rob Nelson
This is a bad idea, as the TPV violators would merely migrate to a non-blacklisted viewer. On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 12:01 +0200, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:10:33 +, Opensource Obscure wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:56:58 +0200, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > > > > > Instead

Re: [opensource-dev] Where to report selling of "Ripper" Viewers?

2010-04-26 Thread Rob Nelson
Unfortunately, don't expect much luck with this. I reported an inworld store for a copybot (it even had the gall to say the developers ran it past the LL legal team) and it's still there after more than 3 weeks. Even if LL took down the inworld store, there's still a website, where LL doesn't real

Re: [opensource-dev] Interested in Terrain Advancement

2010-04-23 Thread Rob Nelson
I'm personally working on Voxel terrain, got most of the opensim framework down, trying to find a place to upload to the code to though. Using Minecraft's generation algorithms, with the author's permission. Fred Rookstown. On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:26 -0700, Dzonatas Sol wrote: > There does seem

Re: [opensource-dev] Requesting Linden Response: Please move TPVPTopics to a different mailing list

2010-04-15 Thread Rob Nelson
The TPV has no differentiation between source code and binary. The GPL requires sourcecode distribution anyway. He's in the wrong and I suspect he knows it. Also, to be quite frank, contracts that are designed to be displayed whenever the user logs into a service should be written so it is clear

Re: [opensource-dev] Requesting Linden Response: Please move TPVP Topics to a different mailing list

2010-04-14 Thread Rob Nelson
n't your only concerns please share them so some of us can > deliver them by proxy for you since the time zone difference seems to > be the biggest problem for you. > > > Ron Festa > Virtual Worlds Admin > Division of Continuing Studies at Rutgers University > PGP key

Re: [opensource-dev] Requesting Linden Response: Please move TPVP Topics to a different mailing list

2010-04-14 Thread Rob Nelson
ote: > Rob, > > I take it you weren't at the meeting yesterday? > > -- Joe > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Rob Nelson > wrote: > It's already reached a point where LL has told us, to our > faces, that > they ar

Re: [opensource-dev] Requesting Linden Response: Please move TPVP Topics to a different mailing list

2010-04-14 Thread Rob Nelson
Yes, I begin sleep at 6:00AM and frequently sleep until 2:30PM. On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 09:27 -0700, Joe Linden wrote: > Rob, > > I take it you weren't at the meeting yesterday? > > -- Joe > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Rob Nelson > wrote: > It&#x

Re: [opensource-dev] Requesting Linden Response: Please move TPVP Topics to a different mailing list

2010-04-14 Thread Rob Nelson
It's already reached a point where LL has told us, to our faces, that they are not going to change the policy, meaning our opinion doesn't mean diddly to them. There's no use continuing to discussion, just as there's no use continuing TPV development. On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 07:52 -0500, Jonathan

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewers in the directory are being impersonated already

2010-04-12 Thread Rob Nelson
Certain griefer viewers already bypass this form of profiling. I won't detail how. Fred Rookstown On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 16:03 -0700, Erik Anderson wrote: > Yah, but it might start looking a bit suspicious if it looks like > you're using computers as one-time pads, always using a different > syst

Re: [opensource-dev] So you don't like the new TOS and wanna move to the OS grid?

2010-04-04 Thread Rob Nelson
Ha. Speaking of colorful, I remember my very first patch ever was a SQL injection fix for OpenSim's grid services (back when OSG when run from PHP scripts) that contained a bunch of cursewords I accidentally left in the comments. On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 22:46 +0100, Gareth Nelson wrote: > Probabl

Re: [opensource-dev] Can you legally agree to incomprehensible conditions

2010-04-02 Thread Rob Nelson
I have one for working on Voxel terrain (which will also completely break compatibility with SL). Lol, losing power. On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 10:38 -0500, Argent Stonecutter wrote: > Sounds like an "impure opensim" fork is needed. > > On 2010-04-02, at 08:19, Gareth Nelson wrote: > > > If these pe

Re: [opensource-dev] Can you legally agree to incomprehensible conditions

2010-04-01 Thread Rob Nelson
Okay, I'm going to try this one last time. When users sign into SL for the first time, they are asked to read and agree to the Terms of Service agreement. Included in the ToS is the Community Standards and now the TPV. *ALL OF THESE DOCUMENTS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE READ AND AGREED TO BY THE END USER

Re: [opensource-dev] Can you legally agree to incomprehensible conditions?

2010-04-01 Thread Rob Nelson
How many times must it be said? The problem isn't that there's people interpreting it. The problem is that there's NO ROOM FOR INTERPRETATION. Section 7a: > If you are a Developer, you are responsible for all features, functionality, code, and content of Third-Party Viewers that you develop or

Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving "NO WARRANTY" for SL TPV developers

2010-03-31 Thread Rob Nelson
ailing list forever while LL steamrolls ahead. Don't be one of the people they run over. Rob Nelson ("Fred Rookstown") Luna Viewer http://luna.nexisonline.net On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 23:40 +0200, Dirk Moerenhout wrote: > I clearly quoted the TPVP and showed what is literally there in

Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving "NO WARRANTY" for SL TPV developers

2010-03-31 Thread Rob Nelson
As a person with computer forensics skills: We aren't supposed to interpret the law and try and give legal advice, we're only supposed to secure a crime scene after first responders have arrived, establish a chain of evidence, and gather, index, and preserve evidence (both exculpatory and incrimin

Re: [opensource-dev] Client 2.0 - sidebar (was: Re: Open Development project: extending avatarwearables)

2010-03-24 Thread Rob Nelson
As an epileptic, let me do say that the viewer has caused "auras" (sort of a buzzing in my head that warns me of an impending seizure) and has caused migraines, particularly due to the GL rendering area getting "squashed" by the sidebar. It's also very disorienting to people. On Wed, 2010-03-24

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy: commencement date

2010-03-23 Thread Rob Nelson
Boy's right, too. * FAQs are not legally binding. * Comments on a mailing list are not legally binding. * Policies attached to a Terms of Service agreement ARE legally binding once we agree to them. I am not going to do any further development of any type of software for Second Life until I

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy: commencement date

2010-03-21 Thread Rob Nelson
Because of these ongoing problems, I have disabled the Luna Viewer's ability to log into Second Life's grids (ADITI and AGNI), and encourage other Open Source viewers to do the same. As an opensource developer, I feel betrayed. Many of us have tried to help your company with bug reports, patche

Re: [opensource-dev] Client Plugin System Design

2010-03-17 Thread Rob Nelson
quirements, too. If firefly is truly using Mono, then I do sincerely hope it fails. Mono is way too slow to run plugins efficiently, and as seeing that the viewer is already chock-full of slowness, I don't want any more overhead added. Rob Nelson Luna Viewer http://luna-viewer.googlecode.com/

Re: [opensource-dev] oh give me a break

2010-03-16 Thread Rob Nelson
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 09:48 +0100, Anders Arnholm wrote: > > There been a nice illustration floating arounf the internet, showing the > problems with DRM protections today, mostly on video media. > > http://www.techxav.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/piratelegal.jpg I love the subtle :trollface:

Re: [opensource-dev] oh give me a break

2010-03-15 Thread Rob Nelson
And what about value of goods, something we learned in highschool civics? The more stuff that is available, the less it's valued. If I were to somehow make a system IRL that cloned pure gold by the truckload, and set up enough plants to produce gold, would gold be worth as much as it was before I

Re: [opensource-dev] oh give me a break

2010-03-14 Thread Rob Nelson
You're very, very delusional. Fred Rookstown On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 21:01 -0600, New Hax wrote: > On 3/14/10, Carlo Wood wrote: > > > > Imho, SL would have have had better products if everything > > had been free and open (no permission system). Then one could > > learn from others and improve th

Re: [opensource-dev] Fwd: Request for comments about llSetAgentEnvironment / SVC-5520

2010-03-14 Thread Rob Nelson
I agree; In fact, people have been trying to communicate with Lindens in some meaningful way (as is required in Open Source projects) since the beginning of the open-sourcing of the viewer, but it seems that Linden Lab seems more inclined to dictate what changes WILL be done rather than gathering

Re: [opensource-dev] Request for comments about llSetAgentEnvironment / SVC-5520

2010-03-10 Thread Rob Nelson
Sigh. I've tackled this in my viewer with a plugin, and yet no one seems interested in the plugin system I'm using; Everyone's hellbent on binary plugins. Feel free to use the code, I haven't added the GPL2 headers yet. http://code.google.com/p/luna-viewer/source/browse/trunk/indra/newview/lu

Re: [opensource-dev] Potential inventory problem?

2010-03-08 Thread Rob Nelson
Hahaha, I remember back when Open Grid Services was written in PHP; I still have it on my webserver somewhere. I think I submitted a patch to you guys several years ago (regarding a SQL injection exploit) where I accidentally left in a bunch of cursing and racial slurs. If I contribute again, I

Re: [opensource-dev] Client Plugin System Design

2010-03-08 Thread Rob Nelson
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 18:19 -0800, Ricky wrote: > So far, barring any LL concepts, we have (as far as I know so far!) > two designs of plugin system: > 1: Socket-based plugins - as suggested by Morgaine. > 2: D-Bus or similar existing IPC tool. > 3: C++ Dynamically Shared Objects - my suggestion.

[opensource-dev] Client-side Permissions Management

2010-03-05 Thread Rob Nelson
While working on my viewer's object handling stuff, I happened across a rather fundamental flaw in the SL viewer's architecture. When one considers filesystem permissions or even database permissions, you notice that permissions are generally attached to the object that a user attempts to access,

Re: [opensource-dev] Eclipse Guru's

2010-03-04 Thread Rob Nelson
Well, now that I've managed to (finally) find most of the UI drawing stuff, it's highly possible that I'll have a working plugin framework for editing LSL (and Lua) scripts from within the viewer within the next year (after I refactor the Lua modules and get GL running). Unfortunately, it looks l

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy

2010-03-02 Thread Rob Nelson
load of advertising to draw the same people back when I'm not even sure if LL isn't going to force us to rebrand everything again in the future for an even more obscure reason. Rob Nelson Luna Viewer (http://luna-viewer.googlecode.com) ___ P

Re: [opensource-dev] FAQ posted for Third Party Viewer Policy

2010-02-26 Thread Rob Nelson
Two months to make changes? I was told we had 3 months. On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 21:14 -0600, Soft Linden wrote: > There's now a FAQ for the Linden Lab Policy on Third Party Viewers: > http://bit.ly/caedse > > This addresses many of the questions and concerns made in > opensource-dev and elsewhere.

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy

2010-02-25 Thread Rob Nelson
lse jump through hoops that the copybotters are going to ignore anyway. All you're doing is making it harder for legitimate people to create content and applications for your grid. Also, are we going to see enforcement of this, or is it going to quietly disappear after about a week like all of th

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy

2010-02-25 Thread Rob Nelson
My estate's prototype land management/group invite bot was banned last night ("Second Life cannot be accessed from this computer, please email us at our non-working support email so we can laugh at you") but it works this morning. Looks like they got too many support emails and had to reverse that

Re: [opensource-dev] So what happens if....

2010-02-23 Thread Rob Nelson
>From my reading, you get banned in all four cases, since you automatically take responsibility for the users' activities (Section 7 3PVP). On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 07:08 +0200, Imaze Rhiano wrote: > First I want to thank LL from efforts to create ethical guidelines for > respectable viewers. Unfort

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy

2010-02-23 Thread Rob Nelson
Thanks LL, you killed my viewer that I have developed alone for two years and was probably a week away from releasing, due to one stupid copyright enfarcement rule: No "Life" in the name. Do you realize how much documentation, sourcecode, licensing, subdomains, bug trackers, wiki, images, logos, g

Re: [opensource-dev] Client-side scripting in Snowglobe

2010-02-19 Thread Rob Nelson
> community uses regularly. > > > > The only thing that we would have to agree on would be the > > set of messages that cross the socket interface, and the set > > of functions and callbacks that the messages would engage in > >

Re: [opensource-dev] Client-side scripting in Snowglobe

2010-02-18 Thread Rob Nelson
B-B-But what about Lua, which has already been implemented in FlexLife (http://flexlife.nexisonline.net)? :( Fred Rookstown Lead Developer On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:42 +, Morgaine wrote: > I referred recently to Linden's internal project "Firefly" to add > client-side scripting to SL viewers.