heya Joe,
in your initial announcement you said there would be three TPV meetings...
is the third one today/cancelled/postponed/forgotten?
bye,
LC
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSourc
I'm not sure what you mean it didn't quite work.
Anyways, I appreciate that Joe wants to gather this Brown-Bag, so we can
talk specifics in words.
Tigro Spottystripes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> a baby can still crawl over the TV remote and turn it on right when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
a baby can still crawl over the TV remote and turn it on right when a
horror movie is playing, that baby analogy didn't quite work
On 10/4/2010 14:14, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> In case I don't make the Brown Bag, I just wanted to point out th
Thank you Joe
I'd like to chime in and bring my own concerns since I won't make it to the
meeting. My primary concern is about the Viewer Directory and here are my
questions :
- Will registering a TPV to the Viewer Directory become mandatory one day ?
If so, how can we be absolutely certain that
Hi Joe,
In case I don't make the Brown Bag, I just wanted to point out the fact
that simply developers, which includes how Linden Lab has invested
resources to sustain such world, don't share a view with users that
Virtual Reality that Virtual Reality is not just a game. This
realization is ac
CeeJay Tigerpaw squeaks up:
I think there is rather a meta issue here which should be articulated again
clearly, before the meeting, that has to do with the interaction between
substantial established businesses and the open-source/third-party-developer
community. Let me see if I can describe
On 04/09/2010 05:29 PM, Joe Miller wrote:
> Henri,
>
> Sorry you can't participate.
Joe,
Is there a compelling reason why the meeting cannot be hold in text? It
looks like that'd accommodate more developers of both, Snowgobe and
Third Party Viewers. A lot of us aren't native speakers and are much
Morgaine,
Thanks for asking. My interest is to listen to specific concerns
voiced by the majority of the community and (more importantly)
take proposed solutions to those concerns under
advisement before the policy becomes effective on April 30. It won't
be very productive for anyone if it's
Henri,
Sorry you can't participate.
-- Joe
Henri Beauchamp wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:24:57 -0700, Joe Linden wrote:
It'll be an informal Q&A session,
What's the point if problems are not actually *addessed* and if
it's just about trying to reassure people without
Joe,
Thanks for doing this. There are obviously a LOT of concerns. I'm not sure
if Linden Lab is willing to do so, but sharing any additional insights about
why certain parts of the TPVP were drafted the way they are, might help.
My ask, of the community: This has the potential to be a meeting w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
in theory it should be possible to record what is said in voice, though
coordinating voice with text for context would be a bit more complicated
(though a video of the meeting with a good resolution and as lossless as
possible codec/compression could d
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:43:42 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> That is probably exactly the reason why they want it to be in voice:
> so that there is no transcript and nobody can use whatever is going
> to be said in court at a later time.
I want to make clear that I refuse this interpretation.
This
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 07:28:14AM -0400, Robert Martin wrote:
> >> Voice is a no-no for me. Being French, I can't speak and understand
> >> spoken English (and worst, American English...) well and fast enough
> >> to hold a conversation in voice.
> >
> also unless im not mistaken holding it in Voi
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 08:37:00 +0200, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
>
>> Voice is a no-no for me. Being French, I can't speak and understand
>> spoken English (and worst, American English...) well and fast enough
>> to hold a conversation in voice.
>
also unless im not mistaken holding it in Voice also gu
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 08:37:00 +0200, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> Voice is a no-no for me. Being French, I can't speak and understand
> spoken English (and worst, American English...) well and fast enough
> to hold a conversation in voice.
+1 (being Italian)
I'm willing to participate and contribute
Joe, nowhere do you say that you are going to feed the community response
back to the people who drafted the TPV, in order to seek change. Was that
implied? Nor do you say that you are going to champion the TPV community's
needs with the appropriate Lindens after your 3 meetings. Was that implie
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:24:57 -0700, Joe Linden wrote:
> It'll be an informal Q&A session,
What's the point if problems are not actually *addessed* and if
it's just about trying to reassure people without any written
warrantee given on LL's side ?
> held in voice, at this location:
Voice is a no-
Hello, all. I've been reading the ongoing commentary here, on various
blogs, irc, and in-world groups about the recently introduced Third Party
Viewer Policy and Directory and I'd like to host an "office hour" or
informal brown bag to make the conversation a little more synchronous for
those who a
18 matches
Mail list logo
