In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:55:26
+0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt * Wed Sep 25 2002 Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt - Don't do an explicit make build-shared, it's not needed and could only
rt cause harm (link libssl against libcrypto
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:55:26
+0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt * Wed Sep 25 2002 Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt - Don't do an explicit make build-shared, it's not needed and could only
rt cause harm (link libssl against libcrypto
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:00:37PM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]:
JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed
that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The
openssl(1) binary wouldn't
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:54:31 +0300,
Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
solar I've now tried removing the patch from our 0.9.6g package and what I
solar get is:
solar
solar 1. Both versions appear to produce a working library now, however:
solar
solar 2. The
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:54:31 +0300,
Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
solar I've now tried removing the patch from our 0.9.6g package and what I
solar get is:
solar
solar 1. Both versions appear to produce a working library now, however:
solar
solar 2. The
[levitte - Fri Nov 15 00:46:03 2002]:
This ticket looks resolved, so I'll mark it as such.
No, it is not resolved. There is a reliable workaround
(REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG). As this is part of OP_ALL, the problem can
only arise for those few applications not enabling the default
workarounds.
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
An early version of the code is now in 0.9.8-dev. Check out the docs in
ASN1_generate_nconf(3) and doc/openssl.txt .
Thanks a lot. It looks great. One question - I checked
crypto/objects/objects.txt and see that the OIDs for Microsoft's
smartcardlogin are still not
Hi,
only a small status question - was the patch for not unique DNs rejected
or do you have actually no time because of the preparation of 0.9.7?
Michael
--
---
Michael Bell Email (private): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the notification and patch. It's now applied and
committed, and this ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 7 13:46:07 2002]:
openssl will read max 31 bytes of client auth challenge,
because the following line assumes total message length
is
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:05:13AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
rt # DIRS= crypto ssl rsaref $(SHLIB_MARK) apps test tools
rt # all: clean-shared Makefile.ssl sub_all
rt make Makefile.ssl
rt make sub_all DIRS=crypto ssl rsaref
rt LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd` make sub_all
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:11:03 +0100,
Michael Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
michael.bell only a small status question - was the patch for not unique DNs rejected
michael.bell or do you have actually no time because of the preparation of 0.9.7?
The unique DN patch has
Mark,
I'm sorry, I can't quite remember where this went. I'm pretty sure
part if the issues in this mail were solved as a result of another
ticket, but I haven't yet looked into the issue with
SSL_CIPHER_get...(). Could you do me the favor of downloading the
latest 0.9.7 snapshot and give
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
An early version of the code is now in 0.9.8-dev. Check out the docs in
ASN1_generate_nconf(3) and doc/openssl.txt .
Thanks a lot. It looks great. One question - I checked
crypto/objects/objects.txt and see that the OIDs for Microsoft's
smartcardlogin are still not
[jaenicke - Fri Jul 19 13:58:12 2002]:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jul 19 11:04:22
2002]:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 10:39:21AM +0200, Martin Sjögren via RT
wrote:
A warning in the man pages for SSL_write (and probably SSL_read
too)
would a good start for this.
I agree.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:26:26
+0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Well, I left it in because the original Makefile would build it too.
rt Is that just to support Configure rsaref?
Yes.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:33:29
+0100 (MET), Michael Bell via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Thanks a lot. It looks great. One question - I checked
rt crypto/objects/objects.txt and see that the OIDs for Microsoft's
rt smartcardlogin are still not present. Can somebody
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:33:29
+0100 (MET), Michael Bell via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Thanks a lot. It looks great. One question - I checked
rt crypto/objects/objects.txt and see that the OIDs for Microsoft's
rt smartcardlogin are still not present. Can
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:06:21
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen Sorry to say that but you didn't apply them correctly. It's not
vinschen
vinschen -march=486
vinschen
vinschen but
vinschen
vinschen -march=i486.
OK, fixed and
[jaenicke - Fri Nov 15 09:38:15 2002]:
I will fix it over the weekend.
Ok, I have finally decided to go with the solution proposed by Steve
Haslam and perform the check based on the id instead of the pointer
to the cipher object (c-id != s-session-cipher_id).
Best regards,
Lutz
I need to extract some infofrom a certificate
and put them in a text file, in order to "import" them in a DB (mysql,
Access,...)
I need this info :
serial number, subject, dates, purpose, pubkey, but
STRUCTURED, that is, for example :
3GF6000D9/ US/ MY OFFICE /SECTION/ SMITH /
PAUL /
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:28:04AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:06:21
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen Sorry to say that but you didn't apply them correctly. It's not
vinschen
vinschen
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:23:57
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen First, there's a build problem which only affects Windows systems due
vinschen to the way DLLs are searched for. In contrast to Unixy systems, shared
vinschen libs are search in
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:12:11PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
vinschen -SET_SO_PATHS=LIBPATH=`cd ..; pwd`; LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$$LIBPATH;
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=$$LIBPATH; SHLIB_PATH=$$LIBPATH; \
vinschen - export LD_LIBRARY_PATH DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH SHLIB_PATH
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:25:57
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen Had it been an include file error, you would probably not have been
vinschen able to build...
vinschen
vinschen I'm still pretty confident that it's an include file problem.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:23:57
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen gcc -I. -I- -I.. -I../include
If you reinstall your older /usr/include/openssl, does the above work?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:23:57
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen First, there's a build problem which only affects Windows systems due
vinschen to the way DLLs are searched for. In contrast to Unixy systems, shared
vinschen libs are search in
Hi.
The PKCS#12 module of openssl has the convenience function
PKCS12_create() for easy creation of PKCS#12 objects. It builds a
PKCS#12 object with a single key and certificate. Recently we had to
create PKCS#12 objects with more than one key and certificate, and I
made a
I had reported earlier that using the 20021027 snapshot of 0.9.7, the NIST
AESAVS Monte Carlo tests fail for AES-128 in CFB mode with 1 byte (8 bit)
data blocks, but got no response. My understanding from the previous
threads on this topic (data block sizes v. key block sizes) was that this
In message 001f01c28cb2$cbbd3fc0$[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:25:05
-0500, Chris Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
cbrook I had reported earlier that using the 20021027 snapshot of
cbrook 0.9.7, the NIST AESAVS Monte Carlo tests fail for AES-128 in
cbrook CFB mode with 1 byte (8 bit)
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:05:13AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
rt # DIRS= crypto ssl rsaref $(SHLIB_MARK) apps test tools
rt # all: clean-shared Makefile.ssl sub_all
rt make Makefile.ssl
rt make sub_all DIRS=crypto ssl rsaref
rt LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd` make sub_all
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:49:17PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:23:57
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen First, there's a build problem which only affects Windows systems due
vinschen to the way DLLs are
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:21:31
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:49:17PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
vinschen In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002
13:23:57 +0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL
Here the URL that gives you the NIST AVS (Algorithm Validation Suite) for
AES.
http://csrc.nist.gov/cryptval/aes/AESAVS.pdf
I have a program that implements the tests that I can send you, along with
their test data, if that would help.
Chris Brook
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:35:53PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Are symlinks possible to do with Cygwin? If they are, I propose we do
it the same way as under Unix (where '.so.0.9.7' ends the file name.
In the Cygwin case, it would end with '.0.9.7.dll' instead...). That
way,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:46:40
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen That's exactly how it can't work. The DLL search algorithm is inside
vinschen of Windows and it doesn't work using symlinks (resp. shortcuts under
vinschen Windows) unfortunately.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:46:40
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen That's exactly how it can't work. The DLL search algorithm is inside
vinschen of Windows and it doesn't work using symlinks (resp. shortcuts under
vinschen Windows)
In message 002901c28cbc$d47a4b80$[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:36:55
-0500, Chris Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
cbrook Here the URL that gives you the NIST AVS (Algorithm Validation
cbrook Suite) for AES.
cbrook http://csrc.nist.gov/cryptval/aes/AESAVS.pdf
Thanks.
cbrook I have a
In message CMM.0.91.0.1037376855.jaltman@watsun on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:14:15 EST,
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jaltman OK, another question: does Windows DLLs have any version information
jaltman inside that's used for comparison, or is it just informative?
jaltman
jaltman The
OK, I'm applying your change of the DLL names. I've transfered that
naming to 0.9.8-dev (which has a different mechanism for building
shared libraries), do you have the possibility to check that the next
0.9.8-dev snapshot works as well (the name is
openssl-SNAL-2002mmdd.tar.gz)? No need to
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:46:40
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen That's exactly how it can't work. The DLL search algorithm is inside
vinschen of Windows and it
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:45:34PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
OK, I'm applying your change of the DLL names. I've transfered that
naming to 0.9.8-dev (which has a different mechanism for building
shared libraries), do you have the possibility to check that the next
0.9.8-dev
I'll try and get to it some time this weekend Richard.
Mark,
I'm sorry, I can't quite remember where this went. I'm pretty sure
part if the issues in this mail were solved as a result of another
ticket, but I haven't yet looked into the issue with
SSL_CIPHER_get...(). Could you do me the
Finally I've finished this port. The patches are very minimal because the
majority of the work is in a seperate library available from my website
(www.essemer.com.au/windowsce/).
After applying the patch:
cd openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021114
unzip
Thanks! Looks good for the most part, the only thing that's just
non-traditional is the direct use of OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WINCE, but
that's easily taken care of.
Oh, yeah, is there any reason to keep VC-CE.pl (as opposed to
util/pl/VC-CE.pl)?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL
OK, there are a couple of things that are unclear to me:
1. INSTALL.WCE is a very good description, although it should have
Perl among the list of requirements at the beginning. I can add
that. One thing is unclear, however: does one do everything on the
WinCE device? Or everything on
As no more information came in with respect to this issue, I consider
this problem to be resolved in the meantime.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
We have built Steven's patch successfully for PocketPC and PocketPC 2002.
The issue is the many different hardware versions it needs to be compiled
for. With the makefile approach (Steven's), a separate build has to be done
for each CPU type - a somewhat labour-intensive exercise :-) Martin
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 16 23:05:31 2002]:
Hey, I didn't actually RUN the thing, I just noticed that file and
like
tools didn't report it as a shell script, which got me thinking...
:-D
Thanks for a prompt reply, in any case.
Thanks, fixed.
Best regards,
Lutz
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 23 09:12:36 2002]:
Hey guys, a low priority bug exists in the openssl command line tool
modulo the documentation. If you run openssl req with the -verbose
option mentioned in then you get an unknown option -verbose
error.
Just thought I'd let you
No more input came with respect to this report. I therefore suppose
that the problem has been solved by the requestor or the requestor gave
up.
I resolve the ticket,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
As no more information was sent with respect to this issue, I consider
this problem to be solved (or the requestor lost its interest in it).
I therefore close the ticket.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Oct 12 11:42:13 2002]:
Hello Richard,
On Friday, October 11, 2002 at 10:15:30 AM +0200, Richard Levitte
via
RT wrote:
On my old Linux box (Intel Debian bo: kernel 2.0.39, gcc
2.7.2.1,
libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.6e build a test in make test
I thought that OPENSSL_SYSNAME_* was the new way of doing things, so I
changed the Microsoft standard UNDER_CE to OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WINCE at the last
minute. I think I had to pull in e_os.h in one of the files to make sure
this was defined. I'll change it all back.
Whoops, last-minute late-night
Richard,
I just noticed that you've commited the changes, and changed
OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WINCE, thanks. Could you please replace util/pl/VC-CE.pl
with the one in the root directory, or just change the double quotes around
$lflags at line#16 with single quotes.
Regards,
Steven
-Original
Chris, thanks for taking the time to test the patch. I'll take a look at
using the %TARGETCPU% to output built files to tmpARM, outARM, outdllARM
instead of tmp32, out32, out32dll.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: Chris Brook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 16 November 2002
I am trying to compile using VC 6,
and I am having the following error when linking:
evp_test.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _strsep
Any ideas ?
Daniel.
__
OpenSSL Project
Everything is done from the Windows box. The test*ce*.bat files use cecopy
to copy files to the device and cerun to invoke the test programs. The
output of the tests is redirected back through cerun, kind of like using
rsh.
I'll look into the time_t problem and get back to you later today.
58 matches
Mail list logo
