Rich, I just want to wish you well on your future endeavors. You've got
valuable skills as a software developer. Hopefully whatever negative
experiences you've recently encountered won't dissuade you from
contributing to open source projects in the future. There are, after
all, an infinite
On 2/26/2019 10:05 PM, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Unlike previous releases, this tar-gzipped file contains a 52 byte file
called 'pax_global_header'. The contents of the file contain a single
line of text:
52 comment=50eaac9f3337667259de725451f201e784599687
my extracted
On 2/26/2019 7:54 AM, OpenSSL wrote:
The distribution file name is:
o openssl-1.1.1b.tar.gz
Size: 8213737
SHA1 checksum: e9710abf5e95c48ebf47991b10cbb48c09dae102
SHA256 checksum:
5c557b023230413dfb0756f3137a13e6d726838ccd1430888ad15bfb2b43ea4b
Unlike previous
On 9/12/2018 7:03 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sep 12, 2018, at 9:53 AM, Thomas J. Hruska
wrote:
Casting to time_t appears to correct the issue and the build completes
successfully:
const time_t default_time =
(time_t)CT_POLICY_EVAL_CTX_get_time(ct_policy_ctx
cl /Z7 /Fdapp.pdb /Gs0 /GF /Gy /MD /W3 /wd4090 /nologo /O2 /WX
/I "include" -D"OPENSSL_SYS_WIN32" -D"WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN" -D"UNICODE"
-D"_UNICODE" -D"_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE"
-D"_WINSOCK_DEPRECATED_NO_WARNINGS" -D"OPENSSL_USE_APPLINK" -D"NDEBUG"
-D_USE_32BIT_TIME_T
I notice the release distribution for 1.1.0i includes a preconfigured
makefile whereas 1.1.0h and earlier do not.
--
Thomas Hruska
Shining Light Productions
Home of BMP2AVI and Win32 OpenSSL.
http://www.slproweb.com/
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe:
I still only see 1.0.2l and 1.1.0f at:
https://www.openssl.org/source/
Tried multiple browsers, flushed caches, etc. The problem does not
appear to be on my end of things.
--
Thomas Hruska
Shining Light Productions
Home of BMP2AVI and Win32 OpenSSL.
http://www.slproweb.com/
--
On 10/9/2017 7:49 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 09/10/2017 16:43, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
On 10/9/2017 7:29 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
I suggest you find a good authoritative source for your claim
that select() should not be used with blocking sockets.
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/select.2
On 10/9/2017 7:29 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
I suggest you find a good authoritative source for your claim
that select() should not be used with blocking sockets.
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/select.2.html
Section BUGS:
"Under Linux, select() may report a socket file descriptor as "ready
On 10/9/2017 1:32 AM, Michel wrote:
With blocking sockets, you just loop back around and repeat the same call
if either of those messages are returned by SSL_get_error(). No select()
required.
Yes, you have to repeat the same call, but select() is still usefull,
especially with blocking
On 10/8/2017 5:58 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
Do you have a reference to what should be done instead?
My understanding of what happens with blocking sockets is that
SSL_read() will return SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ if it needs additional data
read from a socket that doesn't have it available (and will
On 10/8/2017 7:28 AM, Michel wrote:
While I understand that using non-blocking descriptors is a better practice,
I still do not see why select() should NEVER be used for blocking sockets
(except when combined/interfered with the internal OpenSSL state machine or
equivalent mechanism).
Could you
On 10/8/2017 4:17 AM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
The way to handle this situation is simply to never enter SSL_read() if
there isn't anything to read on the socket. select() or pselect() are your
friends, here, because they'll tell you if there's data to read from the
underlying file descriptor.
I
On 7/25/2017 4:15 AM, Seniha S. ÖZTEMİZ TULGAR wrote:
Hello,
I installed the new version of freeradius and trying to configure it. My
windows10 clients gets authenticated but windows7 clients gets the
following errors. It seems that it is about openssl. Can you help me
regarding this problem.
On 12/14/2016 3:28 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016, Salz, Rich wrote:
Is there some equivalent to PHP's openssl_sign_pkcs7 function for C/C++ users?
Look at the apps/pkcs7.c file as a starting point. Get the command line doing
what you want, and then work through the
On 9/15/2016 8:17 AM, Kim Gräsman wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Thomas J. Hruska
<shineli...@shininglightpro.com> wrote:
The precompiled binary installer variants do this already. If you are using
default builds, then that's possibly an option.
We prefer to buil
On 9/15/2016 3:17 AM, Kim Gräsman wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking at integrating OpenSSL 1.1 in our tree, and I noticed the
Windows build system now produces decorated lib names.
The general pattern seems to be lib_[-].lib where
is only appended for 64-bit builds.
We'd prefer a naked lib name, at
On 8/26/2016 12:25 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 26/08/16 19:17, Harster, Kaarl C CIV NAVSEA KPWA, 104 wrote:
Hello,
I've tried many times now to install OpenSSL 1.1.0 pre6 on my Windows 2012 R2
64bit machine.
1.1.0 pre6 is the beta version, but the final 1.1.0 release was made
available
cts the FIPS module
building procedure.
Well, I tried to get my normal distribution source to compile with
/arch:IA32. Didn't go well. :( On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:12 PM,
Thomas J. Hruska <shineli...@shininglightpro.com> wrote:
On 8/23/2016 7:19 AM, Scott Ware wrote:
Shining Light Pr
On 11/9/2015 9:46 PM, 共通基盤ＳＳＬ［業務ＩＤ］ / COMMONSSL，GYOUMU wrote:
Hello,
Does OpenSSL1.0.2d support for Windows 10?
Please let me know if you have any problem running on Windows 10.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Dang
Running Win10 here just fine.
--
Thomas Hruska
Shining Light Productions
Home
On 6/19/2015 12:51 PM, Jay Foster wrote:
On 6/19/2015 10:52 AM, Jay Foster wrote:
On 6/19/2015 8:55 AM, Michael Wojcik wrote:
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On
Behalf
Of Jay Foster
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 11:49
I started over from a clean directory and the
On 6/18/2015 4:46 PM, Jay Foster wrote:
I'm new to building OpenSSL with Windows. I'm trying to build OpenSSL
1.0.2c for Windows, but get a linking error
tmp32dll\x86cpuid.obj : fatal error LNK1112: module machine type 'X86'
conflicts with target machine type 'x64'
I googled for this error,
On 6/4/2015 1:17 PM, Cathy Fauntleroy wrote:
Hello,
I have OpenSSL 1.0.2a installed on my Windows 7 box. I am attempting to
generate a CSR so new security certificates can be issued and am running
into the following error when the command to generate the .csr file is
issued from the
On 3/23/2015 9:51 AM, Kevin Moody wrote:
Hi,
My apologies if I missed a post about this already, but I'm seeing the
following when running `nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak` in the vc9x64 build of openssl
1.0.2a:
...
Assembling: tmp32dll\aesni-sha256-x86_64.asm
tmp32dll\aesni-sha256-x86_64.asm(109) :
On 3/12/2015 9:34 AM, Ken Goldman wrote:
On 3/11/2015 1:39 PM, Serj Rakitov wrote:
11.03.2015, 20:22, Ken Goldman kgold...@us.ibm.com:
I would like to use the Shining Light precompiled openssl binaries
within Visual Studio.
I think you must simply build static or dynamic libraries(as you
None of the latest tarballs compile on Windows. Applying the 1.0.x
patch to fix the 'cflags' issue would violate the default build only
rule of the binary release process.
Also, found an issue with 0.9.8zd not found in 0.9.8zc:
cl /Fotmp32dll\ecs_vrf.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32dll
On 4/14/2014 4:21 PM, Aaron Bahmer wrote:
Sorry for the newbie question, but the archives didn't provide me any help. I'm
dealing with the heartbleed bug, so updating openssl from 1.0.1e to 1.0.1g on a
Windows box where I run Apache/Tomcat.
I downloaded the new openssl tarball (albeit with
On 4/9/2014 8:03 PM, Jeremy Farrell wrote:
Googling check_winnt suggests openssl/e_os.h.
findstr /sic:check_winnt *
Is, IMO, easier and more informative than using Google. Results in:
apps\apps.c:if (check_winnt())
crypto\bio\bss_log.c: if (check_winnt())
crypto\cryptlib.c:
This works fine:
http://opensslfoundation.org/
This raises a certificate warning (Firefox):
https://opensslfoundation.org/
opensslfoundation.org uses an invalid security certificate. The
certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided. The
certificate is only valid for the
On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Jeremy Farrell wrote:
From: Michael Wojcik [mailto:michael.woj...@microfocus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:33 PM
From: Robin Rowe
Sent: Wednesday, 05 March, 2014 14:55
Trying to build Qt with openssl. Built openssl with VC++ 2013 without
incident. However, the
On 2/25/2014 6:21 AM, pachaiyappan R wrote:
Hi ,
snip
but the same cmd executing successfully in windows 2008 server. the
successfully run cmd like as below
*C:\Users\Administratoropenssl*
*WARNING: can't open config file: E:\pachi\openssl/ssl/openssl.cnf*
*OpenSSL version*
*OpenSSL
On 2/9/2014 9:18 PM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Thomas J. Hruska shineli...@shininglightpro.com wrote:
If this ends up being a bug that won't be fixed, then my
recommendation is to build it against VC++. Borland has two
command-line tools called 'impdef' and 'implib' bundled with their
compiler suite
On 2/9/2014 5:27 AM, Ian Rye wrote:
I am new to the mailing list so please forgive me if this request is
inappropriate.
I have followed the instructions from INSTALL.W32 as follows
Borland C++ builder 5
-
* Configure for building with Borland Builder:
perl Configure
On 1/26/2014 12:39 PM, Norbert Kailan wrote:
Whatever I want to do appears an error message and the command is not
executed:
“Unable to load config info from /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf “. There is no
such file after installation!
Reboot your computer.
This is a known but rare issue that only
On 1/7/2014 5:50 AM, Sravanthi wrote:
Hi,
I'm using binary of the openssl for windows. I download the binary from the
openssl site. How should I be applying the vulnerability patches on windows
if I use binaries?
Thanks,
Sravanthi
New binaries are available now. Might have to refresh the
On 8/15/2013 10:24 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
Hi, I'm sorry if this has all been discussed extensively before. A
brief search for DLL hell in the archives turns up disappointingly
(and surprisingly) little. I do see a thread with messages from my
erstwhile colleagues at Sun/Oracle, so I know
On 7/18/2013 12:14 PM, Steve Marquess wrote:
On 07/18/2013 12:53 PM, Nou Dadoun wrote:
Just as a short comment, our fips/non-fips usage could probably
satisfy this requirement; we wrap openssl in an external api that
routes through a function pointer table. Then at run-time we can
fill in the
On 11/13/2012 11:34 AM, Sanford Staab wrote:
I have been struggling with openssl for a few months now writing batch scripts
on windows trying to make a .net web client with a client certificate work with
2-way ssl against an apache web server.
Do you guys just want to continue to answer
On 10/23/2012 7:22 AM, Sanford Staab wrote:
It looks like your missing the openssl.cnf file or maybe the my_key.key file.
Double check your config file and command line parameters.
From: PRIYARANJAN NAYAK
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 3:03 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: error
On 10/16/2012 7:25 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
I have a Windows-only OpenSSL application developed in VS 2010. I have now
been tasked with creating parallel regular and exportable (from the US)
distributions of the application.
I UNDERSTAND YOU CAN'T GIVE LEGAL ADVICE. I'M ONLY LOOKING FOR
On 7/5/2012 8:56 PM, John wrote:
Thomas J. Hruska shineli...@shininglightpro.com wrote in message
news:4ff658d9.2010...@shininglightpro.com...
On 7/5/2012 8:07 PM, John wrote:
Hello. I have OpenSSL-Win64 version 1.0.1c installed on 64-bit Win7. I
am trying to use it to create a random
On 7/5/2012 8:07 PM, John wrote:
Hello. I have OpenSSL-Win64 version 1.0.1c installed on 64-bit Win7. I
am trying to use it to create a random generated file for use in
stunnel, using this command openssl rand -out filexyz.rnd -hex 2048
from the Windows CLI. Although it appears to succeed, but
On 6/20/2012 11:12 AM, John wrote:
John A. Wallace jw72...@verizon.net wrote in message
news:00a701cd4f01$2b569ab0$8203d010$@net...
Hello.
In this instance I am using 64-bit Win7 on a laptop in a home network.
When
I downloaded this version of OpenSSL
On 5/11/2012 9:00 AM, John wrote:
Hello. When using the Win32 OpenSSL v1.0.1c 16Mb Installer from here
http://slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html, I am given the option ner
the very end of the installation to Copy OpenSSL DLLs to either the Windows
system directory or the OpenSSL binaries
On 4/26/2012 5:10 AM, OpenSSL wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.1b released
===
Heads up warning: This archive under 7-Zip 9.20 (latest stable)
displays a There are no trailing zero-filled records error dialog but
On 3/23/2012 12:53 AM, jeremy hunt wrote:
This posting is to help people to build OpenSSL 1.0.1 with Microsoft
Visual Studio. It may also indicate a required change to the build
instructions for Microsoft Visual Studio.
Summary:
--
I found I needed to install the Windows SDK and
On 1/19/2012 10:59 AM, John A. Wallace wrote:
The windows binaries do not appear to have been upgraded yet. It is possible
that some of them are affected, I should think. Thanks.
They are up now.
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-annou...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-
The Register published an article yesterday that some people here might
be interested in on TLS 1.0 being cracked:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/19/beast_exploits_paypal_ssl/
The Register points their Finger of Blame right at OpenSSL.
Of course, a lot of places then blew this out of
On 7/12/2011 6:34 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:03 AM, rick freitagquizzki...@gmail.com wrote:
Questions include:
Why do I need ActivePerl not plain Perl?
I am only using the Cryptolibrary functions from Visual C++.
Sorry to go offlist - I don't know the answer. But
On 3/18/2011 10:10 AM, Samuel Mutel wrote:
Hello,
I have installed Win32OpenSSL-1_0_0d and net-snmp-5.5.0-1.x86 on a Windows
server.
When I launch Net-SNMP, it stop immediately and I have this message on event
log :
Faulting application snmpd.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module unknown,
On 12/3/2010 6:28 AM, Brent Evans wrote:
It would appear that the opensll-0.9.8q.tar.gz file is corrupt.
un-tar fails.
Cheers,
Brent
I can confirm this with an out-of-date version of 7-Zip (v4.65 - yeah,
don't ask) as well as the latest stable version of 7-Zip (v9.20) - I get
a There are
Anil Tambe wrote:
by 2 dlls .. do you mean libssl and libcrypto ?
Actually they are named: ssleay32.dll and libeay32.dll. To get
'libssl', I copy ssleay32.dll to libssl32.dll during installation (they
are the same thing).
--
Thomas Hruska
Shining Light Productions
Home of BMP2AVI and
Running 'openssl s_client' on 0.9.8n without any additional arguments
crashes openssl.exe.
--
Thomas Hruska
Shining Light Productions
Home of BMP2AVI, Nuclear Vision, ProtoNova, and Win32 OpenSSL.
http://www.slproweb.com/
__
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:58:06PM -0700, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
Running 'openssl s_client' on 0.9.8n without any additional arguments
crashes openssl.exe.
On a Linux system it reports a connection refused (to localhost:4433)
I realized after sending the e-mail
OpenSSL wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.0 released
==
Congratulations! It has been many years in the making, but this is a
HUGE milestone for OpenSSL and everyone has worked hard to get this
product to its current
Roger Cruz wrote:
I posted the following message in the stunnel group. I'm following that
posting here because I believe this may be an issue with the underlying
library which is OpenSSL. Is there a known issue with certificates for
version 0.9.8b that are aware of? What version of OpenSSL
Tirtza Bernstein wrote:
Hello,
I installed apache with openssl on windows.
When I try to use openssl command line I get the following error
Can't open config file /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf
How do I change the location where it looks for the config file?
Thanks
Set OPENSSL_CONF.
OpenSSL wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 1
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The first beta is now released.
The beta release
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
I will simply remind you of the following piece of the (signed) announcement:
Oh and to those who have noticed the date... the joke is that it
isn't a joke.
-Kyle H
Doesn't matter if it is signed (I noticed that, BTW). April 1st is all
about looking as legit as
shankar wrote:
Hi All,
could you please point me to a link where i can get openssl dll
LIBEAY32.DLL, built with VC++ 2006 . Note that all latest versions
available are built using VC++ 2008 which is not compatible with my
application,
Regards,
Shankar
You can always build it
Chidambar Kulkarni1 wrote:
Hello,
We are planning for upgrading the OpenSSL libraries which are used in
our application. Currently we are using OpenSSL version 0.9.8d and now
we are planning for a upgrade. What would you suggest us to upgrade to
0.9.8h or 0.9.8j? Will that be backward
Ben Dimick wrote:
Thanks for the tips. I thought this seemed strange, but it was the
only culprit I could produce. I had previously tried reinstalling
the binaries and had no success. I decided to try again because I
think it was the light installed I tried the second time. I did
the full
Ben Dimick wrote:
I hope I'm coming to the right place for this. I installed OpenSSL
on my Vista box and found after I uninstalled that SSL no longer
worked on any of my apps besides Firefox (https on I.E., WebEx, etc).
I found this odd, but I haven't yet found a way to fix it. Is this
Mark Allison wrote:
Problems with decrypting using openssl-0.9.8b and windows 64 (x64).
Same test works on windows 32 bit os.
My first recommendation would be to try the LATEST version of OpenSSL.
A lot of things have changed since that version and the version you are
linking against has
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
I got the notice of the release several hours after the security
advisory. Not sure what happened, but I've since received it.
Thank you, Dr Henson and everyone who works on OpenSSL!
-Kyle H
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Giang Nguyen cau...@hotmail.com wrote:
Does the
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
The fact that root certificates are NEVER trusted, under X.509, unless
they're already in the client store (or are added as a specific
security exception). These are a special class of certificates called
trust anchors (technically, the trust anchor is the public key; the
I know MD5 was broken ages ago but this article expands on the theme -
make your own legitimate-looking root CA:
http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/30/md5-collision-creates-rogue-certificate-authority/
--
Thomas Hruska
Shining Light Productions
Home of BMP2AVI, Nuclear Vision, ProtoNova, and
Tom Worster wrote:
kyle, thank you for your comments. that's very helpful.
i'm unsure now which name to use as common name and which names to put in
subjectAlternativeName. what are the considerations?
thanks for mentioning startcom. i looked at them a few weeks ago but
couldn't determine if
Steve Marquess wrote:
Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
According to the FIPS 1.2 Security Policy, Appendix A, Platform 8
cannot be built as FIPS compliant because 'x84-64 asm' is a
non-existent platform. There is no such thing as x84. It should say
'x86-64 asm'. Validation, from what I understand
According to the FIPS 1.2 Security Policy, Appendix A, Platform 8 cannot
be built as FIPS compliant because 'x84-64 asm' is a non-existent
platform. There is no such thing as x84. It should say 'x86-64 asm'.
Validation, from what I understand, only covers those platforms listed.
Michael Luich wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile in Microsoft Visual C++ Express and I'm getting
linker errors like:
error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _BIO_gets referenced in function
char * __cdecl sr_encrypt(char *,struct _iobuf *) (?sr_encrypt@
@YAPADPADPAU_iobuf@@@Z)
I got the
pbirk wrote:
I'm getting the following error after following the steps in the FIPS users
guide to compile on Windows at this link:
http://openssl.org/docs/fips/UserGuide-1.1.1.pdf. I'm using FIPS 1.1.2
with OpenSSL 0.9.7m. I do ms\do_ms (tried with ms\do_nasm as well), then
nmake -f
Philipp Gühring wrote:
Hi,
The biggest Problem with the Y2038 problem I see is that most people
believe that it will go away due to the migration to 64 Bit machines.
But this isn't going to happen. We have to start fixing 2038 now, also
for all our 32 Bit platforms, 16 Bit platforms and 8 Bit
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
Needless to say, given the lack of response and further web searching
reveals issues with older VC++ linkers core dumping(?) against the latest
MinGW and I've already put forth 30+ hours
One thing I forgot to ask about my FIPS issues: Is FIPS
0.9.8x-compatible/compliant? Based on everything I've read, I am under
the impression that only 0.9.7m is compatible/compliant and that the
team is still working on 0.9.8.
--
Thomas Hruska
Shining Light Productions
Home of BMP2AVI,
Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
Feel free to follow along with this e-mail:
http://www.slproweb.com/download/bad_openssl.zip
I just zipped up the contents of the 'out32dll' directory. What you see
is what I've got in my out32dll directory. And now onto the main part
of the e-mail.
This is my
Feel free to follow along with this e-mail:
http://www.slproweb.com/download/bad_openssl.zip
I just zipped up the contents of the 'out32dll' directory. What you see
is what I've got in my out32dll directory. And now onto the main part
of the e-mail.
This is my first time building FIPS
Raymond Zhou wrote:
Hi there,
My goal is to modify axis2/c so that I can load the openSSL dlls at
runtime, this means that I will need the dlls to exist in the class
path only if my web service calls require SSL communication. The
AXIS2/c mainly calls the openSSL apis starting with SSL_, like
Joe Steorts wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install Win32OpenSSL-0_9_8g.exe on Windows 2003 server with
an uattended install. I saw the exchange shown below at
http://www.nabble.com/OpenSSL-executable-for-Windows-2003-(32-bit)-td19367245.html
. I downloaded Win32OpenSSL-0_9_8g.exe and
Earhart, Darrel wrote:
Hello,
We are trying to mass install the Win32OpenSSL-0_9_8g.exe OpenSSL
program on 3000+ Windows 2003 server systems across multiple datacenters
using a combination of SMS and group policy. The problem is that
SMS/group policy launches a cmd.exe process to kick off the
Ariel Sanchez wrote:
Good afternoon, sir.
Using v.0.9.8g, on Windows XP SP3 (FTP Server), logged in as Local
Administrator account.
I was hoping to get some insight as to why I am getting the following
errors (I hope you can see these screen shots)
I tried the g version since v.0.9.8h was
Frank J. Iannarilli wrote:
Hi,
I tried using both the Win32 v0.9.8g and v0.9.8h (along with Shining
Light's Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable install) binaries, to no avail.
Here's the problem:
openssl x509 -inform DER -in smime.p7s -text
unable to load certificate
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Forwarded to openssl-users for public discussion
Best regards,
Lutz
- Forwarded message from richard jonik [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Forwareded to openssl-users for public discussion
Best regards,
Lutz
- Forwarded message from Satya Narayan [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
David Schwartz wrote:
Of course, for the reasons I told, I did not subscribe to:
openssl-dev open subscribers Discussions on development of the
OpenSSL library.
Note that this is for development *of* *OpenSSL*. Just like the OpenSSL
users list is for users *of* *OpenSSL*.
Pretty sure you're
G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
If you absolutely have to have a 64-bit build (i.e. 32-bit doesn't
work), wait a few weeks. I'm planning on purchasing and installing
Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2008 out of my own pocket (since
almost no one
Gunivortus Goos wrote:
Hello Thomas,
After downloading I ran the install and ready it was.
However, being a MS Windows user, I usually don't read all textfiles,
supposing it works too without that. ;-)
It should. Just installing it should cause any software that depends on
it to function
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
I'm holding back from a 64-bit build of the Win32(?) OpenSSL installer
for another couple weeks because I need to purchase Visual Studio
Professional 2008 (i.e. I can't use VC++ Express) for various reasons
and my development computer gets unhappy
Gunivortus Goos wrote:
Hello yueyue,
it could be compiled as 64 bit version.
That would be great.
I compiler openSSL as 64bit for Vista, but the performance is
nearly half of 32 bit version.
Hmm... Why is that?
I can't do it myself, don't know anything about such technical
things, am
Gunivortus Goos wrote:
Hello Thomas,
You could try building a 64-bit target using Visual C++ 2008
Express (free) and NASM (also free).
???
I'm sorry, I never did any programming, never any compiling,
I'm just an enduser, using payware, shareware and freeware
programs, that are already
Dave Bound wrote:
Is there a way to use Win32 OpenSSL in silent mode?
The installer is Innosetup-based. Read the docs for Innosetup on
several command-line switches that Innosetup has for silent installs.
You should make sure you display a compatible license agreement to your
users when
Dave Bound wrote:
Not everyone can use the default build of OpenSSL.
Can you point me at some docs which will allow me to ascertain whether I
fall into the 'not everyone' category?
-Original Message-
From: Thomas J. Hruska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday 30 October 2007 10:56
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
Dave Bound schrieb:
Hi
Can anyone tell me how to deploy the necessary OpenSSL files as part
of a Win32 application?
The app is deployed using a Windows Installer EXE. I’m not
particularly familiar with how this works, but it has been suggested
that an OpenSSL
Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
I am trying to compile version 0.9.8f for Windows, using VC++ 6.0,
ActivePerl, and MASM 6.15.8803.
I am following the instructions in INSTALL.W32, which works fine for
the previous 0.9.8f build, but when I get to the point of running
nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak I get
I am trying to compile version 0.9.8f for Windows, using VC++ 6.0,
ActivePerl, and MASM 6.15.8803.
I am following the instructions in INSTALL.W32, which works fine for
the previous 0.9.8f build, but when I get to the point of running
nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak I get the following errors in 0.9.8f:
Saju Paul wrote:
is the compile error on the header file (asn1.h) or at the call ?
copy and paste the error include any necessary code.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Phillips, Justin -
ACD
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:55 PM
To:
Saju Paul wrote:
It is very clear that you Thomas have never ever used the hmac routines !!
Oops. And you're right. I've never used them. Just looked them up
(lazy me). Definitely requires the openssl/hmac.h file (but it never
hurts to include the others - particularly the err.h file).
Martin Salo wrote:
Hello Mailinglist,
I have a RSA key written to memory. How can I free the memory?
oBIO = BIO_new(BIO_s_mem());
PEM_write_bio_RSAPrivateKey(oBIO, oRsaKey, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
char *cMem;
iBytesWritten = BIO_get_mem_data(oBIO, cMem);
cMem[iBytesWritten] = '\0';
// How can I
Darryl Miles wrote:
Steffen DETTMER wrote:
this is an interesting topic. I hope it is OK to bother again
even if off-topic.
This topic has been covered before on this list. I do not share David's
beliefs on this matter, the select() readability and writability
indicators are indeed sticky.
Here's what I want to do:
select() on the underlying socket.
IF select() says data is available to be read,
let OpenSSL manage processing that data but not block even if the
socket is blocking.
Check to see if SSL_read() will succeed instantly by calling SSL_pending().
IF SSL_pending()
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
