On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 15:42 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 16/09/14 15:24, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16/09/14 13:56, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
You're quite probably correct - going through the OWASP threat list in more
detail is on my TODO. That was just off the top of my head as something
that has me concerned but I've not investigated it thoroughly.
On 17 September 2014 14:15, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/16/2014 08:56
Hi folks,
We'll be having the Sahara team meeting as usual in
#openstack-meeting-alt channel.
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda#Next_meetings
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Sahara+Meetingiso=20140918T18
correct time link is:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Sahara+Meetingiso=20140918T18
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
We'll be having the Sahara team meeting as usual in
#openstack-meeting-alt channel.
Hi,
as part of general housekeeping on our reviews, it was discussed at last
week's meeting [1] that we should set workflow -1 for stale reviews
(like gerrit used to do when I were a lad).
The specific criteria discussed was 'items that have a -1 from a core
but no response from author for 14
Hi, all!
I have been looking at the bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1338885 and it turned out that it
is relevant not only for firewall rules but for all resources that take
tenant-is for create and update.
I need a piece of advice on a preferable way of solving the problem.
First
1. Not everyone will have an enterprise CMDB, so there should be some way
to input inventory without one (even if it is a text file fed into
ironicclient). The bulk-loading format to do this is TBD.
2. A way to generate that inventory in an automated way is desirable for
some folks, but
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 10:36 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 02:06:59PM -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16/09/14 15:24, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Zane
Thanks for the feedback!
I need to look closer to Cinder Agent specs.
Walter,
Hope, I could help you and Duncan with making this.
Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Mathieu Gagné mga...@iweb.com wrote:
On 2014-09-16 7:03 PM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote:
The upside to
A bit late reply.
As one of translators, I can say wrong strings are worse.
String Freeze is a soft freeze and it just declares we don't make big change
mainly due to feature additions. It does not necessarily prevent fixes
including string changes.
In Horizon case, after starting translations
Hi All,
The convergence blueprint (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95907/) introduces
two new database tables (resource_observed and resource_properties_observed )
for storing the observed state of a resource (currently under review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109012/).
However, it can
Hello stackers,
MagnetoDB team is having IRC meeting tomorrow 13:00 UTC
The agenda can be found here[1]
Feel free to join and add items to agenda
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/WeeklyMeetingAgenda
Have a nice day,
Ilya Sviridov
isviridov @ FreeNode
All,
Currently OpenStack does not have a built-in HA mechanism for tenant
instances which could restore virtual machines in case of a host
failure. Openstack assumes every app is designed for failure and can
handle instance failure and will self-remediate, but that is rarely
the case for the very
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:27:34PM +, Gurjar, Unmesh wrote:
Hi All,
The convergence blueprint (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95907/)
introduces two new database tables (resource_observed and
resource_properties_observed ) for storing the observed state of a resource
(currently
Greetings,
As probably many of you already know, Zaqar (formerly known as Marconi)
has recently been evaluated for integration. This is the second time
this project (and team) has gone through this process and just like last
time, it wasn't as smooth as we all would have liked it to be.
I
Hi Adam
Kristy has already added support to Horizon for federated login to
Keystone. She will send you details of how she did this.
One issue that arose was this:
in order to give the user the list of IDPs/protocols that are trusted,
the call to Keystone needs to be authenticated. But the user
- Original Message -
Hi,
as part of general housekeeping on our reviews, it was discussed at last
week's meeting [1] that we should set workflow -1 for stale reviews
(like gerrit used to do when I were a lad).
The specific criteria discussed was 'items that have a -1 from a core
++ to your suggestion David, I think making
the list of trusted IdPs publicly available makes sense.
- Steve
David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk wrote
on 09/17/2014 09:37:21 AM:
From: David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Kristy
Siu
On 17/09/14 14:40, Charles Crouch wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
as part of general housekeeping on our reviews, it was discussed at last
week's meeting [1] that we should set workflow -1 for stale reviews
(like gerrit used to do when I were a lad).
The specific criteria
On 15/09/14 22:37, Gregory Haynes wrote:
This is a total shot in the dark, but a couple of us ran into issues
with the Ubuntu Trusty kernel (I know I hit it on HP hardware) that was
causing severely degraded performance for TripleO. This fixed with a
recently released kernel in Trusty... maybe
Hi everyone,
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
tomorrow Thursday, September 18th at 22:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting
channel.
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
Anyone is welcome
Background: Health maintenance is very important to users, and I have
users who want to do it now and into the future. Today a Heat user can
write a template that maintains the health of a resource R. The detection
of a health problem can be done by anything that hits a webhook. That
On 17.09.2014 15:45, Steve Martinelli wrote:
++ to your suggestion David, I think making the list of trusted IdPs
publicly available makes sense.
I think this might be useful in an academic/science world but on the
other hand most cloud providers from the 'business' world might be very
On 17/09/2014 14:55, Marek Denis wrote:
On 17.09.2014 15:45, Steve Martinelli wrote:
++ to your suggestion David, I think making the list of trusted IdPs
publicly available makes sense.
I think this might be useful in an academic/science world but on the
other hand most cloud
Has Kristy's patch made it into Juno ?
Tim
-Original Message-
From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk]
Sent: 17 September 2014 15:37
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; Kristy Siu
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Horizon] CORS and Federation
Hi Adam
On 09/17/2014 10:07 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
On 17/09/2014 14:55, Marek Denis wrote:
On 17.09.2014 15:45, Steve Martinelli wrote:
++ to your suggestion David, I think making the list of trusted IdPs
publicly available makes sense.
I think this might be useful in an academic/science world
I had the same thought :)
Config option or some documentation that outlines changes in policy.json.
Either way, we should support both.
David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk wrote
on 09/17/2014 10:07:43 AM:
From: David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
this would work as well, but wouldn't it require two different API calls?
On 17/09/2014 15:17, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/17/2014 10:07 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
On 17/09/2014 14:55, Marek Denis wrote:
On 17.09.2014 15:45, Steve Martinelli wrote:
++ to your suggestion David, I think making the
This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the
conversation to the -dev list where we usually have those sorts of discussions.
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2014-September/009253.html
On Sep 17, 2014, at 7:54 AM, James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hi Tim
I don't believe she has pushed this through the official channel yet as
we were very pushed for time to get something working for our GIANT
CLASSe project. We only did the work in the latter half of August. I
also don't know if we are too late for Juno or not.
regards
David
On
On 09/17/2014 10:14 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
Has Kristy's patch made it into Juno ?
I don't see any patches from Kristy in either the merged or pending
review state for non-keystone projects;
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Kristy+Siu%22,n,z
So I'm guessing it is proof-of-concept code
1. os-apply-config: release: 0.1.21 -- 0.1.22
-- https://pypi.python.org/pypi/os-apply-config/0.1.22
--
http://tarballs.openstack.org/os-apply-config/os-apply-config-0.1.22.tar.gz
2. os-refresh-config: no changes, 0.1.7
3. os-collect-config: no changes, 0.1.28
4.
This has come up a couple of times in IRC now but the people that
probably know the answer aren't available.
There are python-novaclient patches that are adding new CLIs to the v2
(v1_1) and v3 shells, but now that we have the v2.1 API (v2 on v3) why
do we still have a v3 shell in the client?
On 09/17/2014 10:35 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
this would work as well, but wouldn't it require two different API calls?
I think it would be 2 calls no matter what.
OK, lets talk this through:
1. Configure Horizon to return a generic login page, with a button that
says Or do Federated
2.
On 9/16/2014 1:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sep 15, 2014 8:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 08:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-09-15 17:59:10 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
[...]
Sometimes it's pretty hard to determine
On 9/15/2014 12:57 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 9/10/2014 11:08 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 9/9/2014 4:19 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
As we try to stabilize OpenStack Juno, many server projects need to get
out
Hi,
I'm horrified by what I just found. I have just found out this in
glanceclient:
File bla/tests/test_ssl.py, line 19, in module
from requests.packages.urllib3 import poolmanager
ImportError: No module named packages.urllib3
Please *DO NOT* do this. Instead, please use urllib3 from ...
I don't know the specific situation but it's appropriate to do this if you're
using requests and wish to interact with the urllib3 that requests is using.
On Sep 17, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm horrified by what I just found. I have just found out this
Looking at the code on my phone it looks completely correct to use the vendored
copy here and it wouldn't actually work otherwise.
On Sep 17, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
I don't know the specific situation but it's appropriate to do this if you're
using
Thanks for bring this to the list, Flavio.
A few thoughts in line ...
Greetings,
As probably many of you already know, Zaqar (formerly known as Marconi)
has recently been evaluated for integration. This is the second time
this project (and team) has gone through this process and just like
On 17/09/2014 15:38, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/17/2014 10:14 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
Has Kristy's patch made it into Juno ?
I don't see any patches from Kristy in either the merged or pending
review state for non-keystone projects;
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Kristy+Siu%22,n,z
-Original Message-
From: Derek Higgins [mailto:der...@redhat.com]
Sent: 17 September 2014 14:49
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Set WIP for stale patches?
On 17/09/14 14:40, Charles Crouch wrote:
-
hi,
how does one re-open a abandoned change / pull request ? it just timed
out and was then abandoned -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57834/
please let me know
thanks!
alex
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 16 September 2014 01:28, Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com wrote:
The idea would be to leave normal tokens with a smaller validity period
(like the current default of an hour), but also allow one-time use
tokens to be requested.
Cinder backup makes many requests to swift during a backup, one
Hi,
First of all, we should clarify whether your JS client wants to
implement ECP or WebSSO workflow. They are slightly different.
I feel JS is smart enough to implement the ECP flow and then and it
could simply implement what we already have in the keystoneclient [0].
This + some discovery
On 09/17/2014 11:47 AM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
hi,
how does one re-open a abandoned change / pull request ? it just timed
out and was then abandoned -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57834/
please let me know
I re-opened it. You should be able to update it now.
--
Russell Bryant
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 5:00:16 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Horizon] CORS and Federation
On 09/17/2014 10:35 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
this would work
Hi all,
The code for my proof of concept software is at
https://github.com/kwss/horizon/tree/federated (templates)
And
https://github.com/kwss/django_openstack_auth/tree/federated (federation
handling).
Please note that the horizon branch also contains some additional panels for
managing
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:47:06PM +0100, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
hi,
how does one re-open a abandoned change / pull request ? it just timed
out and was then abandoned -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57834/
please let me know
Just re-upload the change, maintaining the same Change-Id
Hi everyone,
I'd like to introduce the new activity board look and feel and other
improvements in the metrics side.
* What is it?
Activity board is the place where you can find development metrics of
the OpenStack Foundation projects.
* Where to get it?
===
There is a
On 09/17/2014 11:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:47:06PM +0100, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
hi,
how does one re-open a abandoned change / pull request ? it just timed
out and was then abandoned -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57834/
please let me know
Just
On 17/09/2014 16:53, Marek Denis wrote:
Hi,
First of all, we should clarify whether your JS client wants to
implement ECP or WebSSO workflow. They are slightly different.
Our modification to Horizon uses WebSSO since this is the obvious
profile for a browser to use as it can handle
On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it should
be a sub-project of the Storage program. While it is targeted for use
by multiple projects, it's pretty
This is where Debian's one urllib3 to rule them all model fails in
a modern fast paced world. Debian is arguably doing the right thing by
pushing everyone to use one API, and one library, so that when that one
library is found to be vulnerable to security problems, one update covers
everyone.
I was trying request-ifying oslo.vmware and ran into this as well:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121956/
And we don't seem to have urllib3 in global-requirements either.
Should we do that first?
-- dims
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
This is where
+1 to Doug's comments.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it should
be a
Use case:
The client software fires the workflow execution and needs to be know when the
workflow is complete. There is no good pool strategy as workflow can take
arbitrary time from ms to days. Callback notification is needed.
Solution is a webhook
Option 1: pass callback URL as part of
On 09/17/2014 09:03 AM, Jastrzebski, Michal wrote:
In short, what we'll need from nova is to have 100% reliable
host-health monitor and equally reliable rebuild/evacuate mechanism
with fencing and scheduler. In heat we need scallable and reliable
event listener and engine to decide which
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 September 2014 19:37
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Expand resource name allowed
characters
Had to laugh about the PILE OF POO character :) Comments inline...
Can we
Ok, here is what I think...
I totally support the first option for its easiness in terms of understanding
how it all should work (no need to figure out if some additional objects must
be deleted if a workflow has been removed etc. etc.). We actually have two BPS
[0] and [1] where the idea was
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas's message of 2014-09-17 10:15:29 -0700:
I was trying request-ifying oslo.vmware and ran into this as well:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121956/
And we don't seem to have urllib3 in global-requirements either.
Should we do that first?
Honestly, after
Excerpts from Jastrzebski, Michal's message of 2014-09-17 06:03:06 -0700:
All,
Currently OpenStack does not have a built-in HA mechanism for tenant
instances which could restore virtual machines in case of a host
failure. Openstack assumes every app is designed for failure and can
handle
Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2014-09-17 06:53:25 -0700:
On 15/09/14 22:37, Gregory Haynes wrote:
This is a total shot in the dark, but a couple of us ran into issues
with the Ubuntu Trusty kernel (I know I hit it on HP hardware) that was
causing severely degraded performance for
Thanks a lot for a comments!
As discussed in IRC (#openstack-cinder), moving Brick to Oslo or Stackforge
isn't the best solution.
We're moving on making Cinder Agent (or Cinder Storage agent) [1] based on
Brick code instead of making Brick as a separate python library used in
Cinder and Nova.
On Sep 17, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas's message of 2014-09-17 10:15:29 -0700:
I was trying request-ifying oslo.vmware and ran into this as well:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121956/
And we don't seem to have urllib3 in
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Kurt Griffiths
kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com wrote:
Right, graphing those sorts of variables has always been part of our
test plan. What I’ve done so far was just some pilot tests, and I realize
now that I wasn’t very clear on that point. I wanted to get a
VLAN is on the radar, vxlan/gre was done to start with.
I believe Vivek mentioned the rationale in some other thread. The gist
of it below:
In the current architecture, we use a unique DVR MAC per compute node
to forward DVR Routed traffic directly to destination compute node.
The DVR routed
On 9/17/14, 1:46 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas's message of 2014-09-17 10:15:29 -0700:
I was trying request-ifying oslo.vmware and ran into this as well:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121956/
And we don't seem to have urllib3 in global-requirements
On 09/16/2014 08:55 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
pub/sub doesn't necessarily guarantees messages delivery, it really
depends on the implementation.
As I understand it, the model for pub-sub in Zaqar is to have multiple
subscribers polling the queue with gets, and have the messages removed
from
This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing.
As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track.
[1] I do not see where this fits into the current planning process that
has been posted.
I would like to assume that part of the purpose of the summit is to
Interestingly enough, the distros are doing exactly what they don't want us
to do, ie, rebuilding things to use 'their' tested version of dependencies
rather than the included one...
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com
wrote:
That aside, I’ve been mulling
On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing.
As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track.
[1] I do not see where this fits into the current planning process that
has been posted.
I would
On Sep 17, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote:
Circling back to the issue of vendoring though: it’s a conscious decision
to do this, and in the last two years there have been 2 CVEs reported for
requests. There have been none for urllib3 and none for chardet.
On 9/17/14, 3:11 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Circling back to the issue of vendoring though: it’s a conscious
decision
to do this, and in the last two years there have been 2 CVEs reported
for
requests.
Hi All,
My understanding of Zaqar is that it's like SQS. SQS uses distributed
queues, which have a few unusual properties [0]:
Message Order
Amazon SQS makes a best effort to preserve order in messages, but due to
the distributed nature of the queue, we cannot guarantee you will receive
messages
On 17/09/2014 23:12, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing.
As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track.
[1] I do not see where this fits into the current planning
Hi all,
What is the default networking service for Sahara? Is it Nova Network or
Neutron? I referred this page
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/sahara/userdoc/features.html#neutron-and-nova-network-support
and it says Nova Network. Is that right?
Thanks,
Sharan Kumar M
On 18 September 2014 08:01, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
Interestingly enough, the distros are doing exactly what they don't want us
to do, ie, rebuilding things to use 'their' tested version of dependencies
rather than the included one...
Indeed - but the distros are solving for two
Hi folks, 0.7.2 has been released with the main changes - synced oslo,
updated requirements and support for security groups.
The 0.7.2 release introduced stable/icehouse incompatibility and so
we've released the 0.7.3 version with fix for it.
Thanks.
P.S. Some links:
Hello magnetodb contributors,
I'm glad to nominate Charles Wang to core developers of MagnetoDB.
He is top non-core reviewer [1], implemented notifications [2] in mdb and
made a great progress with performance, stability and scalability testing
of MagnetoDB
[1]
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 18 September 2014 08:01, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
Interestingly enough, the distros are doing exactly what they don't want
us
to do, ie, rebuilding things to use 'their' tested version of
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:26 PM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
as part of general housekeeping on our reviews, it was discussed at last
week's meeting [1] that we should set workflow -1 for stale reviews
(like gerrit used to do when I were a lad).
The specific criteria
Can you clarify what you mean with the thrashing condition? MAC addresses
only need to be unique per-VLAN so I don't see how the same MAC on multiple
VLANs from the same physical port would lead to any issues.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote:
VLAN is on the
Hi Sharan,
Sahara works with either network service installed in OpenStack. If
OpenStack uses neutron - sahara will use neutron too. If nova network is
used, Sahara supports that as well.
Thanks,
Andrew.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Sharan Kumar M sharan.monikan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the effort Ivan. Your interest in brick is also helping us
push forward with the idea of the agent that we've had in mind for quite
some time.
For those interested, I have created an etherpad that discusses some of
the requirements and design decisions/discussion on the
Hey all,
I am officially removing myself as a core member of the Zaqar project.
Thanks for all the good times, friends, and I wish you the best for the future!
Cheers,
- Alej
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Thanks guys!
Alex
On 17 September 2014 17:16, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/17/2014 11:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:47:06PM +0100, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
hi,
how does one re-open a abandoned change / pull request ? it just timed
out and
On Sep 17, 2014 3:48 PM, Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote:
Thanks for the effort Ivan. Your interest in brick is also helping us
push forward with the idea of the agent that we've had in mind for quite
some time.
For those interested, I have created an etherpad that discusses
Earlier today we discovered a problem with the way pbr is generating dev
version numbers for commits following tags using alpha pre-version suffixes
[1]. Basically what’s happening is a commit following a tag like 1.3.0.0a3 is
coming out as a 1.3.0.devX version, which then appears to be older
On 09/17/2014 11:50 PM, Alejandro Cabrera wrote:
Hey all,
I am officially removing myself as a core member of the Zaqar project.
Thanks for all the good times, friends, and I wish you the best for the
future!
Alejandro,
I think I speak for everyone when I say the project is where it is
Thanks for everything Alej!
Besides your contributions to the Zaqar team you also shown to be a great
person.
I'm truly grateful that I could have you as a mentor during GSoC.
All the best :)
2014-09-17 19:14 GMT-03:00 Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com:
On 09/17/2014 11:50 PM, Alejandro
Great question. So, some use cases, like guest agent, would like to see
something around ~20ms if the agent is needing to respond to requests from a
control surface/panel while a user clicks around. I spoke with a social media
company who was also interested in low latency just because they
On Sep 17, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote:
Project X pins a version of requests. Alice doesn’t know anything about
requests and does pip install X. Until Alice takes a more active role in
the development of Project X and looks into requests, she will never
I agree as well. I think moving them to an unimplemented folder makes sense
and would be helpful in reviewing if one re-proposes a blueprint.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 10:01 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
Some of the specs had a
On a related and slightly less problematic case is another one like this...
https://github.com/rholder/retrying/issues/11
On Sep 17, 2014, at 8:15 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm horrified by what I just found. I have just found out this in
glanceclient:
File
Thanks for all your effort on Zaqar, Alej. And all the help for me when
I involved in Zaqar. I assume you will be not far away from the team and
OpenStack :)
On 18/09/14 09:50, Alejandro Cabrera wrote:
Hey all,
I am officially removing myself as a core member of the Zaqar project.
Thanks
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:24 AM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote:
Sullivan, Jon Paul jonpaul.sulli...@hp.com writes:
I think this highlights exactly why this should be an automated
process. No errors in application, and no errors in interpretation of
what has happened.
So
TL;DR: I consider the poor state of log consistency a major impediment for
more widespread adoption of OpenStack and would like to volunteer to own this
cross-functional process to begin to unify and standardize logging messages and
attributes for Kilo while dealing with the most egregious
Hello,
Recent sampling of test run times shows that our tempest jobs run
against clouds using PostgreSQL are significantly slower than jobs run
against clouds using MySQL.
(check|gate)-tempest-dsvm-full has an average run time of 52.9 minutes
(stddev 5.92 minutes) over 516 runs.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Background: Health maintenance is very important to users, and I have
users who want to do it now and into the future. Today a Heat user can
write a template that maintains the health of a resource R. The detection
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
