[openstack-dev] [ironic] reminder about deadlines

Hi all! Half of the Queens cycle is behind us. I'd like to remind about a few deadlines and how they affect us: 1. Jan 18th is the non-client library release deadline. It affects ironic-lib and sushy. The latter has a few outstanding changes - please try to find some time to get them a bit

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Removing old baremetal commands from python-tripleoclient

On 12/15/2017 04:49 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi All, In review I01837a9daf6f119292b5a2ffc361506925423f11 I updated ValidateInstackEnv to handle the case when then instackenv.json file needs to represent a node that deosn't require a pm_user for IMPI to work. It turns out that I foudn that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

On 12/15/2017 11:00 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: - Original Message - On 12/14/2017 9:38 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: And the QE in me says that there are enough moving parts around for the integration testing (because CD yes, but the resources are limited) that a longer cycle with a longer

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

On 12/14/2017 05:55 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Dec 13, 2017, at 4:38 PM, German Eichberger wrote: It looks like the implicit expectation is that devs also need to attend the Forums at the summit in addition to the PTG. The Forums, though important, hardly made

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

On 12/13/2017 11:20 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Ed Leafe wrote: On Dec 13, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Tim Bell wrote: There is a risk that deployment to production is delayed, and therefore feedback is delayed and the wait for the ‘initial bug fixes before we deploy to prod’ gets

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

On 12/13/2017 06:29 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:16:35PM +, Chris Jones wrote: Hey On 13 December 2017 at 17:12, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Thierry Carrez wrote: - It doesn't mean that teams can only meet in-person once a year. Summits would

[openstack-dev] [ironic] midcycle recording and summary

Hi all! Sorry for the delay with this, here is the summary of the midcycle. The midcycle notes are at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-queens-midcycle, and the recording is https://bluejeans.com/s/h7gNU (requires flash, but can be downloaded). We discussed four topics: (I) Queens

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] moving the weekly meeting to our channel? (spoiler: YES)

We had a voting on the Monday's meeting, and agreed to move the meeting. The meeting next Monday will happen in #openstack-ironic. On 11/20/2017 05:19 PM, Ruby Loo wrote: On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com <mailto:dtant...@redhat.com>> wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-12, December 2-8

On 11/30/2017 02:40 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: Development Focus - The Queens-2 milestone deadline is December 7th. All projects with specific deadlines should be wrapping them up in time to submit the release request before the end of day on the 7th. General Information

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rename ovb jobs?

On 11/30/2017 08:11 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: A few months ago, we renamed ovb-updates to be tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024. The name is much longer but it describes better what it's doing. We know it's a job with one controller, one compute and one storage node,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

On 11/27/2017 11:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, We are in the final step in the process of signing the contract with the PTG venue. We should be able to announce the location this week ! So it's time to start preparing. We'll have 5 days, like in Denver. One thing we'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] save the date: virtual midcycle on Nov 27th

Reminder: the call is today, in a bit more than 3 hours! This also means that we won't have a usual meeting today. On 11/20/2017 06:11 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 11/20/2017 05:49 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! The winning date for the midcycle is Nov 27th. The call will take up to 4

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] save the date: virtual midcycle on Nov 27th

On 11/20/2017 05:49 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! The winning date for the midcycle is Nov 27th. The call will take up to 4 hours, 3pm UTC to 7pm UTC (unless I'm confusing time zones again). We will use the bluejeans room https://bluejeans.com/973312948 (works without plugins in recent

[openstack-dev] [ironic] save the date: virtual midcycle on Nov 27th

Hi all! The winning date for the midcycle is Nov 27th. The call will take up to 4 hours, 3pm UTC to 7pm UTC (unless I'm confusing time zones again). We will use the bluejeans room https://bluejeans.com/973312948 (works without plugins in recent browsers, see the etherpad for details).

[openstack-dev] [ironic] moving the weekly meeting to our channel?

Hi all, Due to a technical issue we had to have our weekly meeting in our main channel this time. And we liked it :) I wonder if we should switch to it. Pros: * easier to find * no channel switching Cons: * potential conflicts with other meetings (already a problem, given how many rooms we

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [requirements] moving driver dependencies to global-requirements?

On 10/31/2017 12:11 AM, richard.pi...@dell.com wrote: From: Dmitry Tantsur [mailto:dtant...@redhat.com] Cons: 1. more work for both the requirements team and the vendor teams Please elaborate on the additional work you envision for the vendor teams. Any requirements updates with have

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [requirements] moving driver dependencies to global-requirements?

I don't think it affects containers directly. Depending on how you build containers you may have to do nothing (if you use package, for example) or update your pip install to do a different thing (or things). On 10/30/2017 09:48 PM, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: The second seem to be better

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [requirements] moving driver dependencies to global-requirements?

On 10/30/2017 11:28 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: On 17-10-30 20:48:37, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: The second seem to be better suited for per driver requirement handling and per HW type per function. Which option is easier to handle for container per dependency for the future? Thanks,

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On 11/14/2017 09:01 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 11/14/2017 01:28 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: The quality of backported fixes is expected to be a direct (and only?) interest of those new teams of new cores, coming from users and operators and vendors. I'm not assuming bad intentions, not at all

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On 11/14/2017 11:17 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2017-11-14 15:50:08 -0600: On 11/14/2017 02:10 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2017-11-14 14:01:58 -0600: On 11/14/2017 01:28 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: The quality

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

On 11/14/2017 06:21 PM, Erik McCormick wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: Hi all - please note this conversation has been split variously across -dev and -operators. One small observation from the discussion so far is that it seems as

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On 11/14/2017 05:08 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: The concept, in general, is to create a new set of cores from these groups, and use 3rd party CI to validate patches. There are lots of details to be worked out yet, but our amazing UC (User Committee) will be begin working out the details. What

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

Hi! Thanks for raising this. On 11/14/2017 05:16 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi all, as this topic it was recently brought up in ironic IRC meeting, I'd like to start a discussion on the subject. A quick recap - networking-generic-switch project (n-g-s) was born out of necessity to do

[openstack-dev] [ironic] automatic migration from classic drivers to hardware types?

Hi folks! This was raised several times, now I want to bring it to the wider audience. We're planning [1] to deprecate classic drivers in Queens and remove them in Rocky. It was pointed at the Forum that we'd better provide an automatic migration. I'd like to hear your opinion on the

[openstack-dev] [ironic] virtual midcycle planning

Hi all! We're slowly progressing from Queens M-2 to M-3, and it means that it's time for a virtual midcycle! Please put proposed topics to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-queens-midcycle. Please vote on a date on https://doodle.com/poll/wcqeu66fa6axusvw. We will pick 1-2 days,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

On 11/10/2017 11:51 PM, John Dickinson wrote: On 7 Nov 2017, at 15:28, Erik McCormick wrote: Hello Ops folks, This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and very productive session about how to go about keeping a selection of past releases available and

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

Hi! This is amazing to see this discussed! Looking forward to more details. On 11/08/2017 12:28 AM, Erik McCormick wrote: Hello Ops folks, This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and very productive session about how to go about keeping a selection of past releases

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers job needs attention

On 11/03/2017 02:22 AM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: Greetings, We noticed the job  legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers failing in the gate in the following patches [1], [2].  The job was voting in the review here [3].  ATM the job is non-voting in check and voting in the gate.  This is

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] traits discussion call - moved to Tue!!

On 11/02/2017 04:14 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Nov 2, 2017, at 4:17 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: The recording of the call is https://bluejeans.com/s/K3wZZ Ugh: "To watch the video, you need Adobe Flash Player 10.1 or higher" I know :( There is a way

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] traits discussion call - moved to Tue!!

Hi all, The recording of the call is https://bluejeans.com/s/K3wZZ On 10/30/2017 03:32 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: It seems that the new time works for the most of key people, so let's move it to tomorrow (Tue), the same time, the same bluejeans. Apologies to those who won't be able to attend

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] testing ansible-deploy in gates

On 10/31/2017 07:09 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi all, as we have agreed on the PTG, we are about to pull the ansible-deploy interface from ironic-staging-drivers to ironic. We obviously need to test it on gates too, in a non-voting mode like snmp and redfish ones. This raises couple

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [requirements] moving driver dependencies to global-requirements?

Hi all, So far driver requirements [1] have been managed outside of global-requirements. This was mostly necessary because some dependencies were not on PyPI. This is no longer the case, and I'd like to consider managing them just like any other dependencies. Pros: 1. making these

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] traits discussion call - moved to Tue!!

. How about we push it back to tomorrow at the same time? Can everyone make it then? -jay On 10/30/2017 10:11 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Aaaand sorry again, but due to sudden errands I won't be able to attend. Please feel free to use my bluejeans room anyway. I think my position on traits

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] traits discussion call

:11 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Aaaand sorry again, but due to sudden errands I won't be able to attend. Please feel free to use my bluejeans room anyway. I think my position on traits is more or less clear from previous discussions with John, Sam and Eric. 2017-10-24 18:07 GMT+02:00 Dmitry

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] traits discussion call

Aaaand sorry again, but due to sudden errands I won't be able to attend. Please feel free to use my bluejeans room anyway. I think my position on traits is more or less clear from previous discussions with John, Sam and Eric. 2017-10-24 18:07 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Kernel parameters needed to boot from iscsi

This is a bit offtopic, but a couple of comments on BFV. On 10/25/2017 03:55 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 25 October 2017 at 13:03, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: (ooops, I somehow missed this email. sorry!) Hi Yolanda, On 10/16/2017 11:06 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Kernel parameters needed to boot from iscsi

On 10/25/2017 02:15 PM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: Answering inline... Note that we only support BFV in the form of booting from a cinder volume officially. We haven't looked into iBFV in depth. I have been testing that on the context of booting from SAN. It is at deploy time, in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic 3rd Party CI Meetings

Hi! Sorry, I've somehow lost this email. This slot will work for me personally. On 09/26/2017 10:23 PM, rajini.kart...@dell.com wrote: *Dell - Internal Use - Confidential * Hi all, It was actually discussed in irc, after the ironic meeting yesterday that we will have weekly/biweekly 3^rd

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystoneauth] [osc] [ironic] Usage of none loader in the CLI

Hi! Thanks for raising this. On 10/19/2017 01:11 PM, Vladyslav Drok wrote: Hi! I'd like to discuss the usage of the new noauth plugin to keystoneauth, which was introduced in [1]. The docstring of the loader says it is intended to be used during adapter initialization along with

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Kernel parameters needed to boot from iscsi

(ooops, I somehow missed this email. sorry!) Hi Yolanda, On 10/16/2017 11:06 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: Hi Recently i've been helping some customers in the boot from ISCSI feature. So far everything was working, but we had a problem when booting the deployment image. It needed specifically

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preping for the stable/newton EOL

On 10/25/2017 04:57 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:11:15PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 10:15:56AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:51:06PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: I'll prep the list of repos that will be tagged EOL real soon now

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] traits discussion call

Sigh, sorry. I forgot that we're moving back to winter time this weekend. I *think* the time is 3pm UTC then. It seems to be 11am eastern US: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20171030T15=37=tz_et. On 10/24/2017 06:00 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: And the winner is Mon

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] traits discussion call

And the winner is Mon, 30 Oct, 2pm UTC! The bluejeans ID is https://bluejeans.com/757528759 (works without plugins in recent FF and Chrome; if it asks to install an app, ignore it and look for a link saying "join with browser") On 10/23/2017 05:02 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all!

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

state is tracked. > > Software > > > defined infrastructure may be the future but hardware defined > > software/* > > > > > > */is sadly the present…/* > > > > > > */ /* > > > > > > */I do however thi

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] traits discussion call

gt;> Software >> > defined infrastructure may be the future but hardware defined >> software/* >> > >> > */is sadly the present…/* >> > >> > */ /* >> > >> > */I do however

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

angout or videoconference to > discuss this? Unfortunately today and tomorrow I'm not able to do a hangout > but > I can do one on Wednesday any time of the day. > > Lemme know! > -jay > > On Oct 23, 2017 5:01 AM, "Dmitry Tantsur" <dtant...@redhat.com > <m

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

wrote: > Sorry for delay, took a week off before starting a new job. Comments > inline. > > On 10/16/2017 12:24 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I promised John to dump my thoughts on traits to the ML, so here we go :) >> >> I see two roles

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Support for single OpenStack system supporting VM and Baremetal Instances simultaneously ?

Hi Greg! Answers inline. On 10/20/2017 09:25 PM, Waines, Greg wrote: > Hey, > > We are in the process of integrating OpenStack Ironic into our own OpenStack > Distribution. Nice to hear :) > > Is there support for a single OpenStack system supporting VM and Baremetal > Instances simultaneously

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

//review.openstack.org/507052 > <https://review.openstack.org/507052> > [3] > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/507052/4/specs/queens/approved/ironic-traits.rst@88 > > <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/507052/4/specs/queens/approved/ironic-traits.rst@88> &g

[openstack-dev] [ironic] summary of the ironic-inspector virtual sprint

Hi all, We've had a virtual sprint for ironic-inspector. Most of the time we were discussing the potential re-architecture of it. Please see https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/inspector-queens-virtual-ptg for notes and action items, and https://bluejeans.com/s/5yDpk for the recording. Dmitry

[openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

Hi all, I promised John to dump my thoughts on traits to the ML, so here we go :) I see two roles of traits (or kinds of traits) for bare metal: 1. traits that say what the node can do already (e.g. "the node is doing UEFI boot") 2. traits that say what the node can be *configured* to do (e.g.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Sydney Forum Project Onboarding Rooms

Hi! I would like to request a room for Ironic. I won't be there, but Julia Kreger agreed to run the room. I hope to find more ironic people to be there :) On 10/05/2017 05:50 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hello :) > > We have a little over 40 slots available so we

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Proposing Shivanand Tendulker for ironic-core

> > > > +1 > > > > Regards > > Nisha > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Loo, Ruby <ruby@intel.com > <mailto:ruby@intel.com>&

[openstack-dev] [ironic] my notes from the PTG in Denver

Hi all! Here are my notes from the ironic (and a bit of nova) room in Denver. The same content in a nicely rendered form is on my blog: http://dtantsur.github.io/posts/ironic-ptg-denver-2017-1.html http://dtantsur.github.io/posts/ironic-ptg-denver-2017-2.html Here goes the raw rst-formatted

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

(top-posting, as it is not a direct response to a specific line) This is your friendly reminder that we're not quite near containerized ironic-inspector. The THT for it has probably never been tested at all, and the iptables magic we do may simply not be containers-compatible. Milan would

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][quickstart][rdo] shipping python-virtualbmc in Newton to allow undercloud upgrades from Newton to Queens

Hi! The only issue I can think of is python-pyghmi version. I think one in Newton is too old and has to be bumped to at least one in Ocata. But if you say you've deployed successfully, probably it was already bumped for some reason. On 10/04/2017 02:08 PM, Lee Yarwood wrote: Hello all, I'm

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Proposing Shivanand Tendulker for ironic-core

Hi all! I would like to propose Shivanand (stendulker) to the core team. His stats have been consistently high [1]. He has given a lot of insightful reviews recently, and his expertise in the iLO driver is also very valuable for the team. As usual, please respond with your comments and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Dell Ironic CI Migration

Hi! Thanks for letting us know. Next time please update the whiteboard with such information. I've updated it for you now, but I don't know the estimated end of downtime, could you please fill it in? On 09/29/2017 08:34 PM, rajini.kart...@dell.com wrote: Hi all Dell Ironic 3^rd party CI is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][nova][ironic][mogan] Evaluate Mogan project

Hi! Thanks for raising this. I was interested in the project for some time, but I never got a chance to wrap my head around. I also have a few concerns - please see inline. On 09/25/2017 01:27 PM, Zhenguo Niu wrote: Hi folks, First of all, thanks for the audiences for Mogan project update

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Queens priorities and release schedule (please read)

Hi all! This is an update to our processes based on what we discussed during the PTG. (1) Queens cycle priorities We realized that we took too much on ourselves during the Pike cycle. We also realized that it ended up with a (false) perception that the priorities list is our complete

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Team photos

Hi all! Here are wonderful team photos from the PTG: serious - https://www.dropbox.com/s/9nz92cjm1sztqpl/ironic-team-serious.JPG?dl=0 funny - https://www.dropbox.com/s/ue4xcklvewhxdt2/ironic-team-funny.JPG?dl=0 Thanks Kendall for organizing it! Dmitry. P.S. I have to apologize to people who

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] tools for creating new releases

On 08/22/2017 02:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-22 11:38:10 +0200: On 08/22/2017 11:34 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 08/21/2017 09:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-08-21 11:21:59 -0400: Excerpts from

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Add Mohammed Naser to cores

I think it's not unreasonable to give core rights to the PTL :) On 09/05/2017 05:42 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: Hey folks, I'm writing to ask that we add mnaser to the cores list for the puppet modules. He's been a user and contributor for some time and is also the new PTL. Let me know if there

[openstack-dev] [ironic] PTG schedule (preliminary version)

Hi all! We're close to finalizing our schedule, and the current version can be seen at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-queens-ptg. I've created four etherpads per block of topics for our notes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-queens-ptg-ongoing-work

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic]are there any projects about monitoring nodes

Hi! What exactly monitoring would you expect? Health status, performance, etc? Ironic can collect IPMI sensor data and send it to ceilometer: https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/install/configure-ipmi.html#collecting-sensor-data. On 09/01/2017 08:53 AM, 王俊 wrote: Hi, We want

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg][interop][refstack][all][ironic][cinder]RefStack and Interop WG PTG Agenda

On 09/01/2017 07:07 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: The RefStack and Interop WG teams will host a small work room on Monday and Tuesday at the PTG. We would like for projects interested in the interop guideline expansion to participate in guiding the development of future guidelines. The draft schedule

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [cinder] [ironic] PTG cross-platform meetup possibility

og.e0ne.info/ On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com <mailto:dtant...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi! I'm all for it. Monday sounds okay to me, though I'll have to manage some conflicts, of course. On 08/29/2017 05:56

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [cinder] [ironic] PTG cross-platform meetup possibility

Hi! I'm all for it. Monday sounds okay to me, though I'll have to manage some conflicts, of course. On 08/29/2017 05:56 PM, Richard Wellum wrote: Hi Folks, Would there be some interest from Cinder and Ironic (and others of course) team members to have a quick session at the PTG with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Team dinner at the PTG?

And the final day is Monday, Sep 11th. See you there! :) On 08/23/2017 03:46 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi folks! We're trying to organize an informal team meeting at some place, probably with burgers and beer, in Denver. Note that it won't be sponsored. Please vote in the Doodle https

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] PTG planning etherpad

/nvavg9ab9ebq2e4v. We will need some time to do the booking in advance. On 08/21/2017 08:00 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: A reminder that the PTG is coming :) We have only two Mondays left, and Sep 4th is apparently a holiday in the US. That means we have to more or less decide on the schedule next Monday

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers core cleanup and additions

We seem to be in agreement, so I'll apply these changes. Thanks all! On 08/22/2017 11:24 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! This email concerns the ironic-staging-drivers project which is outside of the official Ironic governance. Please ignore it if you don't care about this project. I've

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Team dinner at the PTG?

Hi folks! We're trying to organize an informal team meeting at some place, probably with burgers and beer, in Denver. Note that it won't be sponsored. Please vote in the Doodle https://doodle.com/poll/nvavg9ab9ebq2e4v about the days you're available. If you're local, we need you help

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] heads up: custom resource classes, bare metal scheduling and you

Hi all! There have been some talks about $subj recently, but I've just realized that not everyone is still aware of it. So, this is a heads up about recent changes in nova scheduling of bare metal instances. If you only use standalone deployments, you can ignore it. If you run a 3rd party CI,

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] tools for creating new releases

On 08/22/2017 11:34 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 08/21/2017 09:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-08-21 11:21:59 -0400: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-15 14:11:05 +0200: On 08/08/2017 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: We realized

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] tools for creating new releases

On 08/21/2017 09:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-08-21 11:21:59 -0400: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-15 14:11:05 +0200: On 08/08/2017 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: We realized recently that we haven't publicized some of the tools

[openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers core cleanup and additions

Hi all! This email concerns the ironic-staging-drivers project which is outside of the official Ironic governance. Please ignore it if you don't care about this project. I've checked the core [1] and the release [2] teams for the project, and I think they need an update based (see [3]). I

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] PTG planning etherpad

A reminder that the PTG is coming :) We have only two Mondays left, and Sep 4th is apparently a holiday in the US. That means we have to more or less decide on the schedule next Monday, Aug 28th. Please add your ideas by that time! On 07/28/2017 12:19 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [release] [stable] pike release

On 08/21/2017 05:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Sam Betts (sambetts)'s message of 2017-08-21 10:01:35 +: Quick reply with my thoughts in-line. Sam On 21/08/2017, 10:13, "Dmitry Tantsur" <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: (adding the release and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [release] [stable] pike release

(adding the release and stable team just for their information) Thanks Julia and everyone for handling this situation while I was out. More comments inline. On 08/17/2017 07:13 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: Greetings everyone! As some of you may have noticed, we released ironic 9.0.0 today. But

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] tools for creating new releases

On 08/08/2017 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: We realized recently that we haven't publicized some of the tools in the releases repository very well. One tool that will be useful this week as you prepare your release candidates is the 'new-release' command, which edits a deliverable file to add a

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Countdown to Pike final

Hi team! I would like to finish our releases, or at least the most of them, by the middle of next week to leave some time for stabilization and to avoid problems with the requirements repo branching. We have released ironic-lib, ironic-ui, sushy and the clients already. Now we need to figure

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][I18n][OpenStackClient][Quality Assurance][Security][Telemetry][ec2-api][heat][horizon][ironic][kuryr][magnum][manila][monasca][murano][neutron][octavia][senlin][solu

Hi Tony! I hope to finish releasing Ironic stuff next week. We still have a few critical things to land. On 08/10/2017 07:46 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi All, In an effort to qualify which projects are likley to be affected if when we open the requirements repo I generated a list of all

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL Voting is now open

On 08/10/2017 02:01 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: Hello Again! Elections are underway and will remain open for you to cast your vote until Aug 16th, 2017 23:45 UTC. We are having elections for Ironic and Documentation. By the way, why do I receive a poll, given that I'm one of candidates? :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] support for various glance image reference formats - do we need them all?

Hi! Thanks for raising this. On 08/07/2017 02:47 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi all, currently our GlanceImageService seems to support several ways of defining a reference to glance image: 1) simple image UUID [0] 2) image UUID prefixed with 'glance://' protocol [1] (well, actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

On 08/03/2017 04:50 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-03 16:16:12 +0200: Hi! On 08/03/2017 03:03 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Welcome to our regular release countdown email! Actions --- Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

Hi! On 08/03/2017 03:03 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Welcome to our regular release countdown email! Actions --- Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model should post a RC1 openstack/releases request during the week (X.0.0.0rc1), together with a stable/pike branch request.

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Dmitry Tantsur candidacy for Bare Metal (Ironic) PTL

of our wonderful team :) -- Dmitry Tantsur __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On 07/28/2017 11:13 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: As Thierry mentioned in his countdown email today, the release team has now created the stable branches for most deliverables with type "library". We have 3 exceptions: 1. python-neutronclient had a late release, so I will be branching it

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][stable][ptl][infra] Strategic discussion regarding the future of documentation for EOL releases

On 07/28/2017 09:12 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 2017-07-27 21:40, Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] Please encourage everyone there to explore options that require the least amount of effort. An ideal solution is one we can implement without heroic efforts or having to recruit an army of

[openstack-dev] [ironic] PTG planning etherpad

Hi all! It was already announced on the meeting, but not on the ML. Here is our planning etherpad for the PTG: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-queens-ptg Please check "The Rules" section before proposing a topic. Please also add yourself to the list of potential attendees in the

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Results of the Pike-3 priorities clean-up

Hi team! We cleaned up our priorities on the last meeting. Here are things that we are still pushing for (roughly from top to bottom): * Generic boot-from-volume * Rolling upgrades and grenade-partial * Reference architecture guide * Driver composition reform follow-up * OSC default API

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] releasing tripleoclient final (pike)

On 07/25/2017 05:48 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hi! Hi! This week is pike-3 milestone and also final release for clients, which means we're going to cut a stable/pike branch for python-tripleoclient. It will be done by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486657/ before Wednesday EOD - please

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][keystone] internal endpoints vs sanity

These questions are to the operators, and should be asked on openstack-operators IMO (maybe with tuning the overall tone to be a bit less aggressive). On 07/24/2017 10:23 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote: Thanks for your answer. The real question is do we agree in the internalULR usage what suggested

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Heads-up: classic drivers future (please read if you maintain a driver)

Hi all! With the driver composition implemented in Ocata and polished in Pike, we would like to eventually get rid of the old-style drivers. I believe the new hardware types are much easier to understand, create and use. We have landed a spec laying down the deprecation plan [1]. In essence,

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Soft feature freeze proposal

Hi team! As discussed on the IRC meeting, I would like to propose a soft feature freeze for ironic, starting with Aug 1st. I hope this proposal will help us better concentrate on the priorities and finally be able to finish most of the things we've committed to. Between this day and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Forming our plans around Ansible

On 07/12/2017 04:18 AM, Steve Baker wrote: On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:47 AM, James Slagle > wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Steve Baker > wrote: > > > On Tue,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Let's use Ansible to deploy OpenStack services on Kubernetes

On 07/14/2017 06:16 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: https://xkcd.com/927/ I don't think adopting helm as a dependency adds more complexity then writing more new k8s object deployment tooling? I don't know much about the containerization work, and I don't have a big say in TripleO, but that's the

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] another ironic-stable-maint update proposal

Hi all! I'd like to propose another round of changes to the ironic-stable-maint group [0]: 1. Add Julia Kreger (TheJulia) to the group. Julia is one of the top reviewers in Ironic, and she is quite active on stable branches as well [1]. 2. Remove Jim Rollenhagen (sigh..) as he no longer

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [dib] RFC: moving/transitioning the ironic-agent element to the ironic-python-agent tree

As no objections were recorded, I'm proceeding with the plan. Governance change for ironic-python-agent-builder: https://review.openstack.org/476900. On 05/22/2017 04:59 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/22/2017 03:10 PM, Sam Betts (sambetts) wrote: I would like to suggest that we create a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" terminology

On 06/19/2017 05:42 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: On Jun 15, 2017, at 5:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: [...] I think those are all fine. The other term that popped into my head was "Friends of OpenStack" as a way to describe the openstack-hosted efforts that

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >