Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-22 Thread Tom Fifield
On 18/09/14 16:03, Thierry Carrez wrote: Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote: On 17/09/2014 23:12, Anita Kuno wrote: On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote: This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing. As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-18 Thread Thierry Carrez
Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote: On 17/09/2014 23:12, Anita Kuno wrote: On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote: This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing. As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track. [1] I do not see where this fits

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-17 Thread Maish Saidel-Keesing
This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing. As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track. [1] I do not see where this fits into the current planning process that has been posted. I would like to assume that part of the purpose of the summit is to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-17 Thread Anita Kuno
On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote: This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing. As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track. [1] I do not see where this fits into the current planning process that has been posted. I would

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-17 Thread Maish Saidel-Keesing
On 17/09/2014 23:12, Anita Kuno wrote: On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote: This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing. As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track. [1] I do not see where this fits into the current planning

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-15 Thread Anita Kuno
On 09/12/2014 11:54 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Anita Kuno wrote: My question involves third party discussions. Now I know at least Neutron is going to have a chat about drivers which involves third party ci accounts as a supportive aspect of that discussion, but I am wondering about the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-12 Thread Zane Bitter
On 12/09/14 07:37, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, I visited the Paris Design Summit space on Monday and confirmed that it should be possible to split it in a way that would allow to have per-program contributors meetups on the Friday. The schedule would go as follows: Tuesday:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-12 Thread Eoghan Glynn
I visited the Paris Design Summit space on Monday and confirmed that it should be possible to split it in a way that would allow to have per-program contributors meetups on the Friday. The schedule would go as follows: Tuesday: cross-project workshops Wednesday, Thursday: traditional

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-12 Thread Russell Bryant
On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: If you think this is wrong and think the design summit suggestion website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'll see how we can spin up a limited instance. I think this is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-12 Thread Anita Kuno
On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, I visited the Paris Design Summit space on Monday and confirmed that it should be possible to split it in a way that would allow to have per-program contributors meetups on the Friday. The schedule would go as follows: Tuesday:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-12 Thread Thierry Carrez
Eoghan Glynn wrote: If you think this is wrong and think the design summit suggestion website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'll see how we can spin up a limited instance. +1 on a collaborative scheduling process

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-12 Thread Thierry Carrez
Russell Bryant wrote: On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: If you think this is wrong and think the design summit suggestion website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'll see how we can spin up a limited

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-12 Thread Thierry Carrez
Anita Kuno wrote: My question involves third party discussions. Now I know at least Neutron is going to have a chat about drivers which involves third party ci accounts as a supportive aspect of that discussion, but I am wondering about the framework for a discussion which I can recommend

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-12 Thread Anita Kuno
On 09/12/2014 11:54 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Anita Kuno wrote: My question involves third party discussions. Now I know at least Neutron is going to have a chat about drivers which involves third party ci accounts as a supportive aspect of that discussion, but I am wondering about the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit planning

2014-09-12 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Sep 12, 2014 10:05 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: If you think this is wrong and think the design summit suggestion website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC'