[openstack-dev] [Openstack][TripleO] Identifying root disk of server deployed by TripleO

I deployed a server having three drives using TripleO. How can I know which disk is root disk? I need this information as I have a utility which will format all drives except root disk. Utility is being used for some solution we are developing using machines deployed by TripleO. Regards, Jyoti Ran

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [feature freeze exception] FFE for libvirt-disk-discard-option

I will be the third here. Approved and added to the etherpad of doom. Michael On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/05/2014 07:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:28:55AM +, Bohai (ricky) wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to ask for a feature fre

Re: [openstack-dev] how to provide tests environments for python things that require C extensions

I too agree this can be useful beyond openstack. It will great if one of you (experts) can explain in more details how the python virtual environment is heavyweight than docker containers. I am just a user of devstack without the nitty gritty details of its inner workings. However, I can say that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

Thus, it get approved and added to the etherpad of doom. Michael On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > I looked at the Tempest change, it should be landable. I'll sign up for > review on these, as the rest of the patches are pretty straight forward. > > -Sean > > On 09/05/2

[openstack-dev] [nova][FFE] Use Libvirt Storage Pools (Partial)

Hi, I would like to request a feature freeze exception for the first part of the use-libvirt-storage-pools blueprint [1]. Overview The patches in question [2] would entail adding support for libvirt storage pools, but neither making them default nor adding in automatic transitioning [3

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 14:14 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > For a long time I've use the LKML 'subsystem maintainers' model as the > > reference point for ideas. In a more LKML like model, each virt team > > (or other subsystem team) would have their own separate GIT re

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

Daniel, Thanks for the well thought out and thorough proposal to help Nova. As an OpenStack operator/developer since Cactus time, it has definitely gotten harder and harder to get fixes in Nova for small bugs that we find running at scale with production systems. This forces us to maintain more a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 08:02 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/05/2014 07:40 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:12:37AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 09/05/2014 06:40 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > >>> A handy example of this I can think of is the currently granted FFE for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Keystone] Steps toward Kerberos and Federation

On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Marco Fargetta wrote: I understand the general idea and the motivations but I am not sure about the implementation. Even with a SPA you still need to provide credentials and manage tokens for the authentication/authorisation in a way not too much different from the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Question about where to render haproxy configurations

Hi German, Responses in-line: On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Eichberger, German wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > > I think this is a good discussion to have and will make it more clear why > we chose a specific design. I also believe by having this discussion we > will make the design stronger. I

Re: [openstack-dev] Feature freeze + Juno-3 milestone candidates available

+1 to what Jay said. I’m not sure whether the string freeze applies to bugs, but the defect that Matt mentioned (for which I authored the fix) adds a string, albeit to fix a bug. Hoping it’s more desirable to have an untranslated correct message than a translated incorrect message. :-) - Joe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][FFE] Support of Cinder QOS Specs in Horizon

Hi Richard, I¹ll review your changes. You still have to get one more core to agree to review the patches though. Good luck! -Lin From: , "Richard (ESSN Storage MSDU)" Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Friday, September 5, 2014 at 3:09 PM To: OpenStack List Cc: "Gershon, Dave" , "Hagarty, Richar

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

I looked at the Tempest change, it should be landable. I'll sign up for review on these, as the rest of the patches are pretty straight forward. -Sean On 09/05/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Still wrote: > So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers? > > Michael > > On Sat, Sep 6, 201

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] FFE tracking

Hey Everyone, I was trying to just use Launchpad to track these but there's been requests for an etherpad similar to what Mikal put together. So here it is [1] Thanks, John [1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-cinder-approved-ffes ___ OpenStack-

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally] Parallel scenarios

Hi Ajay, Rally as of now does not support launching different scenarios in parallel; implementing this functionality is, however, one of the major points in our roadmap (see this blueprint ), since being able to produce

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers? Michael On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Day, Phil wrote: > The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci): > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1 so its kind of just a question of > getting the sequence

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][FFE] make ssh host key policy configurable

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Jay Bryant wrote: > Not sure if the patch to make the ssh strict policy setting configurable > needed an official ffe. It merged after the tag so I wanted to cover my > bases. > > This is my request. > > Thanks! > Jay > > https://review.openstack.org/114336 > > __

[openstack-dev] DefCore Community Meetings 9/10 & 9/11 AGENDA (Lighthouse.7)

The DefCore project is moving forward and needs more and more eyes on it. The next meetings are on Sept 9 and 10, with the same agenda to facilitate global access. I'm sharing the details below. All members of OpenStack ecosystem should follow this process closely as it is going to define what an

[openstack-dev] [Glance] "Where are the docs" updated

The "Glance where are the docs?" wiki page has been updated: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-where-are-the-docs By the way, the Docs Team is having a bug-squash day on 9th September 2014 if you feel like writing prose instead of python: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/Bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Question about where to render haproxy configurations

Hi Stephen, I think this is a good discussion to have and will make it more clear why we chose a specific design. I also believe by having this discussion we will make the design stronger. I am still a little bit confused what the driver/controller/amphora agent roles are. In my driver-less de

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-driver-numa-placement

For better or for worse we have already merged about half of the patches for this series, so I think stopping now because of concerns about CI is pretty arbitrary. I do think Sean's point about scheduler tests outside of tempest is valid though and I'd like to see it reflected in the review comment

[openstack-dev] [Nova] List of granted FFEs

Hi, I've built this handy dandy list of granted FFEs, because searching email to find out what is approved is horrible. It would be good if people with approved FFEs could check their thing is listed here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-nova-approved-ffes Michael -- Rackspace Austra

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature Freeze exception for juno-slaveification

Approved. Michael On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > I am also happy to sponsor it. I've already reviewed the patches... > > On 09/05/2014 04:34 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson > > wrote: >> >> Hi a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

Well, I'm definitely down to do some work on something like that (especially since the original quote was from me ;-)). Perhaps we should split this off into a separate thread and have some design/feature discussions once the mad rush to get Juno out the door dies down? Best Regards, Solly -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [FFE] Final Libvirt User Namespaces Patch

Approved. Michael On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Matt Dietz wrote: > Thirding sponsorship. > > I didn¹t review as much as the other two, but I helped merge a couple of > the patches. Agreed with Jay otherwise; we¹re almost there, let¹s finish > it. > > -Original Message- > From: Jay Pip

[openstack-dev] [Horizon][FFE] Support of Cinder QOS Specs in Horizon

Hello, I am requesting an exception for the Horizon "Cinder QOS Specs" blueprint[1]. The blueprint addresses adding QOS Spec management in Horizon and completely covers the Cinder QOS CLI commands. There are 4 patches that implement this blueprint, the first of which has already landed in Juno

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [FFE] Final Libvirt User Namespaces Patch

Thirding sponsorship. I didn¹t review as much as the other two, but I helped merge a couple of the patches. Agreed with Jay otherwise; we¹re almost there, let¹s finish it. -Original Message- From: Jay Pipes Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: F

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature Freeze exception for juno-slaveification

I am also happy to sponsor it. I've already reviewed the patches... On 09/05/2014 04:34 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson mailto:geekinu...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, I am requesting an exception for the juno-slaveification blueprint. There is a s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature Freeze exception for juno-slaveification

> All the other patches from this blueprint have merged, the only > remaining patch really just needs a +W as it has been extensively > reviewed and already approved previously. This may be an easy > candidate since Andrew Laski, Jay Pipes and Dan Smith have reviewed > and +2'd

Re: [openstack-dev] Feature freeze + Juno-3 milestone candidates available

Matt, I don't think that is the right solution. If the string changes I think the only problem is it won't be translated if it is thrown. That is better than breaking the coding standard imho. Jay On Sep 5, 2014 3:30 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: > > > On 9/5/2014 5:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote

[openstack-dev] Mirror changes

Hey all! A few of quick notes about PyPI mirrors and the gate. Firstly - today we just rolled out per-cloud-region mirrors. Hopefully this eliminate issues we have from time to time with connections to PyPI timing out. We have a selector script running on node creation, so nodes in, say, Rack

[openstack-dev] [Cinder][FFE] make ssh host key policy configurable

Not sure if the patch to make the ssh strict policy setting configurable needed an official ffe. It merged after the tag so I wanted to cover my bases. This is my request. Thanks! Jay https://review.openstack.org/114336 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature Freeze exception for juno-slaveification

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson wrote: > Hi all, > > I am requesting an exception for the juno-slaveification blueprint. There > is a single outstanding patch [1] which has already been approved before, > but needed to be re-spun due to gate failures which then necessitated a > rebase

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > On 09/04/2014 10:25 PM, Solly Ross wrote: > > Anyway, I think it would be useful to have some sort of page where people > > could say "I'm an SME in X, ask me for reviews" and then patch > submitters could go > > and say, "oh, I need an some

Re: [openstack-dev] Feature freeze + Juno-3 milestone candidates available

On 9/5/2014 5:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, We just hit feature freeze[1], so please do not approve changes that add features or new configuration options unless those have been granted a feature freeze exception. This is also string freeze[2], so you should avoid changing transla

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-driver-numa-placement

On 09/05/2014 11:20 AM, John Garbutt wrote: On 5 September 2014 13:59, Nikola Đipanov wrote: Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already sponsored it, and as per [1] cores can sponsor their own

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Coraid CI system

On 09/05/2014 04:43 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 09/05/2014 10:33 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> Hi Mykola, >> On 09/05/2014 04:09 PM, Mykola Grygoriev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> My name is Mykola Grygoriev and I'm engineer who currently working on >>> deploying 3d party CI for Сoraid Сinder driver. >> >>

[openstack-dev] [OSSN 0026] Unrestricted write permission to config files can allow code execution

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Unrestricted write permission to config files can allow code execution - --- ### Summary ### In numerous places throughout OpenStack projects, variables are read directly from configuration files and used to construct statements which are executed wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

On 09/05/2014 03:01 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 09/05/2014 10:06 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 09/05/2014 06:29 AM, John Garbutt wrote: Scheduler: I think we need to split out the scheduler with a similar level of urgency. We keep blocking features on the split, because we know we don't have the rev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

If I take a recent case we had, we’re looking for ways to simplify backup for our users. They should not have to write crons to do snapshots but leave that to a service. Raksha seems promising… a wiki page on openstack.org, code in github etc. How can the average deployer know whether a stackf

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] VM/Container Naming Issue

Hi Jorge, That was totally my bad. Since we had lukewarm to *no* consensus on the original list, I had a late inspiration to see if people liked the idea of using a Roman container name, given our project has a Roman name. Everyone on IRC was in favor, though that could’ve also just been grasping

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Request for J3 FFE - NetApp: storage pools for scheduler

Hi Cinder Folks, I would like to request a FFE for cinder pools support with the NetApp drivers[1][2]. We began working on this patch as soon as Winstons pool-aware scheduler changes[3] became stable and this patch is ready now that Winstons code has been merged. These changes have been well test

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing Gertty 1.0.0: A console interface to Gerrit

On 2014-09-04 16:17:04 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote: [...] > * Your terminal is an actual terminal -- Gertty works just fine >in 80 columns, but it is also happy to spread out into hundreds >of columns for ideal side-by-side diffing. > > * Colors -- you think ANSI escape sequences

[openstack-dev] [congress] For people attending the mid-cycle policy summit

We have a couple of requests for all of you planning to attend the 18-19th September Policy Mid-cycle summit. 1. We’re planning on starting with a series of talks describing the state of policy (current and possibly future) in different projects. We've confirmed people for talks on the follo

[openstack-dev] [Octavia] VM/Container Naming Issue

Hey guys, I just noticed that "Amphora" won the vote. I have several issues with this. 1) Amphora wasn't in the first list of items to vote on. I'm confused as to how it ended up in the "final" round. The fact that it did makes me feel like the first round of votes were totally disregarded. 2) T

[openstack-dev] Election Season, PTL and TC September-October 2014

PTL Election details: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Elections_September/October_2014 TC Election details: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TC_Elections_October_2014 Please read the stipulations and timelines for candidates and electorate contained in these wikipages. There will be an announ

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

On 09/05/2014 10:06 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 09/05/2014 06:29 AM, John Garbutt wrote: >> Scheduler: I think we need to split out the scheduler with a similar >> level of urgency. We keep blocking features on the split, because we >> know we don't have the review bandwidth to deal with them. Right

[openstack-dev] [rally] Parallel scenarios

Hi In Rally is there a way to run parallel scenarios? I know the scenario can support concurrency but I am talking about running multiple such scenarios themselves in parallel Ajay ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Question about where to render haproxy configurations

Hi German, Thanks for your reply! My responses are in-line below, and of course you should feel free to counter my counter-points. :) For anyone else paying attention and interested in expressing a voice here, we'll probably be voting on this subject at next week's Octavia meeting. On Thu, Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] StackTach.v3 - Screencasts ...

For those of you playing the home game ... just added four new screencasts to the StackTach.v3 playlist. These are technical deep dives into the code added over the last week or so, with demos. For the more complex topics I spend a little time on the background and rationale. StackTach.v3:

Re: [openstack-dev] Status update on the python-openstacksdk project

On Sep 5, 2014, at 10:21 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: > Hi all, > > Between recent IRC meetings and the mid-cycle operators meetup, we've > heard things ranging from "is the SDK project still around" to "I > can't wait for this." I'm Brian Curtin from Rackspace and I'd like to > tell you what the py

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Request for J3 Feature Freeze Exception

Hello dear cinder stackers, Recently, the feature freeze was acted for J3, while I was frantically trying to tighten the feedback loop on the driver I was working on for my company, Scality, in hope of getting merged for J3. I felt I was really close, a lot of reviews coming in the last few days,

[openstack-dev] [all] Stable Havana 2013.2.4 preparation

Hi all, as planned[1] stable-maint team is going to prepare the final stable Havana release 2013.2.4, now that Juno-3 was released. Proposed release date is Sep 18, with the code freeze on stable/havana branches week before on Sep 11. Stable-maint members: please review open backports [2] taking i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][FFE] glance_store switch-over and random access to image data

I'm +1 on the FFE for both of these branches. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 09/05/2014 05:20 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> Greetings, > >> > >> I'd like to request a FFE for 2 features I've been working on during > >> Juno which, unfortuna

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

On 09/05/2014 03:52 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: So my biggest fear with a model where each team had their own full Nova tree and did large pull requests, is that we'd suffer major pain during the merging of large pull requests, especially if any of the merges touched common code. It could mak

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][all][Heat] Packaging of functional tests

On 09/05/2014 12:10 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:42:17AM +1200, Steve Baker wrote: On 05/09/14 04:51, Matthew Treinish wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 04:32:53PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:45:59AM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/29/2014 05:15

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Tim Bell wrote: > > The one concern I have with a small core is that there is not an easy > way to assess the maturity of a project on stackforge. The stackforge > projects may be missing packaging, Red Hat testing, puppet modules, > install

[openstack-dev] oslotest 1.1.0.0a2 released

The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of oslotest 1.1.0.0a2, the latest version of the oslo library with test base classes and fixtures. This release includes: * Add fixture for mock.patch.multiple * Ensure that mock.patch.stopall is called last * Remove differences between Python 2.x

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

Well, I and I believe a few others feel a slightly higher sense of urgency about splitting out the scheduler but I don't want to hijack this thread for that debate. Fair warning, I intend to start a new thread where we can talk specifically about the scheduler split, I'm afraid we're in the sit

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][all][Heat] Packaging of functional tests

On 09/05/2014 12:10 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:42:17AM +1200, Steve Baker wrote: On 05/09/14 04:51, Matthew Treinish wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 04:32:53PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:45:59AM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/29/2014 05:15

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1 so its kind of just a question of getting the sequence right. Phil > -Original Message- > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] > Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE] [nova] Barbican key manager wrapper

-Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 8:50 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE] [nova] Barbican key manager wrapper On 09/05/2014 08:11 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/05/2014 07:51 AM, Daniel P.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] default allow security group

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > I've decided that as I have problems with OpenStack while using it in the > service of Infra, I'm going to just start spamming the list. > User CLI/API feedback! > neutron security-group-create default --allow-every-damn-thing > You mean

Re: [openstack-dev] how to provide tests environments for python things that require C extensions

On 09/05/2014 12:05 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Monty Taylor wrote: > >> The tl;dr is "it's like tox, except it uses docker instead of >> virtualenv" - which means we can express all of our requirements, not >> just pip ones. > > Oh thank god[1]. > > Seriously. > > jogo started

[openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature Freeze exception for juno-slaveification

Hi all, I am requesting an exception for the juno-slaveification blueprint. There is a single outstanding patch [1] which has already been approved before, but needed to be re-spun due to gate failures which then necessitated a rebase. For those not familiar with the work, the spec[2] can shed som

Re: [openstack-dev] how to provide tests environments for python things that require C extensions

On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Monty Taylor wrote: The tl;dr is "it's like tox, except it uses docker instead of virtualenv" - which means we can express all of our requirements, not just pip ones. Oh thank god[1]. Seriously. jogo started a thread about "what matters for kilo" and I was going to respon

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][all][Heat] Packaging of functional tests

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:42:17AM +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > On 05/09/14 04:51, Matthew Treinish wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 04:32:53PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:45:59AM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: > >>> On 08/29/2014 05:15 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 29/0

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > 2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil : >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for >> server groups. >> >> Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful >> anti-affinity filter for sched

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][feature freeze exception] Proposal for using Launcher/ProcessLauncher for launching services

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Kekane, Abhishek < abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com> wrote: > Hi Erno, > > I agree that we must document what all config parameters will be reloaded > after SIGHUP signal is processed, that's the reason why we have added > DocImpact tag to patch https://review.openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][FFE] glance_store switch-over and random access to image data

On 09/05/2014 05:20 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Flavio Percoco wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I'd like to request a FFE for 2 features I've been working on during >> Juno which, unfortunately, haven been delayed for different reasons >> during this time. >> [...] > > I would be inclined to give both a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] default allow security group

I believe your request matches this, and I agree it'd be something good https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/default-rules-for-default-security-group And also, the fact that we have hardcoded default security group settings. It would be good to have a system wide default security gro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Sahara][FFE] Requesting exception for Swift trust authentication blueprint

Smaller review teams don't really need to line up core sponsors as much as Nova does. As long as Sergey and myself are fine with it, you can go for it. I'm +1 on this one becauise it's actually a security bug we need to plug before release. Trevor McKay wrote: > Not sure how this is done, but I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-driver-numa-placement

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:20:14PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: > On 5 September 2014 13:59, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > > Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that > > this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already > > sponsored it, and as per [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-driver-numa-placement

On 09/05/2014 05:20 PM, John Garbutt wrote: > On 5 September 2014 13:59, Nikola Đipanov wrote: >> Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that >> this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already >> sponsored it, and as per [1] cores can sponsor th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Coraid CI system

-1 from me (non-cinder core) It very nice to see you're making progress. I, personally, was very confused about voting. Here's my understanding: "Voting": it is the ability to provide an official +1 -1 vote in the gerrit system. I don't see a "stable history" [1]. Before requesting voting, you

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Juno-3 released

I'm glad to announce Juno-3 release of Murano: https://launchpad.net/murano/+milestone/juno-3 We've implemented 8 blueprints and closed 50 bugs. Thanks a lot to everyone who worked on this milestone. All these efforts helped to significantly improve quality and test-coverage of the project! Thank

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:25:09AM -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 10:26 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > 2. Removal of drivers other than the reference implementation for each > > > project could be the healthiest option > > > a. Requires transparent, public, auto

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

> I look at what we do with Ironic testing current as a guide here. > We have tempest job that runs against Nova, that validates changes > to nova don't break the separate Ironic git repo. So my thought > is that all our current tempest jobs would simply work in that > way. IOW changes to so called

Re: [openstack-dev] [Sahara][FFE] Requesting exception for Swift trust authentication blueprint

Not sure how this is done, but I'm a core member for Sahara, and I hereby sponsor it. On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:57 -0400, Michael McCune wrote: > hey folks, > > I am requesting an exception for the Swift trust authentication blueprint[1]. > This blueprint addresses a security bug in Sahara and re

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Keystone] Steps toward Kerberos and Federation

I understand the general idea and the motivations but I am not sure about the implementation. Even with a SPA you still need to provide credentials and manage tokens for the authentication/authorisation in a way not too much different from the current implementation. Additionally, this might have

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil : > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for > server groups. > > Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful > anti-affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to > use, but w

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] default allow security group

Hi! I've decided that as I have problems with OpenStack while using it in the service of Infra, I'm going to just start spamming the list. Please make something like this: neutron security-group-create default --allow-every-damn-thing Right now, to make security groups get the hell out of ou

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-driver-numa-placement

On 5 September 2014 13:59, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that > this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already > sponsored it, and as per [1] cores can sponsor their own FFEs so that's 3. While I am no fan of t

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 10:26 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > 2. Removal of drivers other than the reference implementation for each > > project could be the healthiest option > > a. Requires transparent, public, automated 3'rd party CI > > b. Requires a TRUE plugin architecture and ment

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][FFE] glance_store switch-over and random access to image data

Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > I'd like to request a FFE for 2 features I've been working on during > Juno which, unfortunately, haven been delayed for different reasons > during this time. > [...] I would be inclined to give both a chance, but they really need to merge quickly, and the c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila]

Hi Jyoti This is the wrong email list: we use openstack-dev only to discuss future development of OpenStack project. Use the General mailing list or the one for Operators (check http://lists.openstack.org). Alternatively search for answers (and if you don't find any, ask questions) on https:/

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][feature freeze exception] Proposal for using Launcher/ProcessLauncher for launching services

Kekane, Abhishek wrote: > [...] > If we have this feature in glance then we can able to use features like > reload glance configuration file without restart, graceful shutdown etc. > > Also it will use common code like other OpenStack projects nova, > keystone, cinder does. I think it makes a lot

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Status of Neutron at Juno-3

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Robert Kukura wrote: > Kyle, > > Please consider an FFE for > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-hierarchical-port-binding. > This was discussed extensively at Wednesday's ML2 meeting, where the > consensus was that it would be valuable to get this i

[openstack-dev] [Manila]

Which of file system appliances are supported as of today? We are thinking to integrate with our cloud. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [TripleO]

I deployed a server having three drives using TripleO. How can I know which disk is root disk? I need this information as I have a utility which will format all drives except root disk. Utility is being used for some solution we are developing using machines deployed by TripleO. Regards, Jyoti Ran

[openstack-dev] [TripleO]

I deployed a server having three drives using TripleO. How can I know which disk is root disk? I need this information as I have a utility which will format all drives except root disk. Utility is being used for some solution we are developing using machines deployed by TripleO. Regards, Jyoti Ran

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New meeting rotation starting next week

Just an updated note here. The IPV6 sub-team has moved their meeting time, so I've claimed #openstack-meeting at 1400UTC on Tuesday's for the Neutron team meeting. I'll send a note reminding folks of the change on Monday. Thanks, Kyle On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > Per dis

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Group-based Policy next steps

I can only see the use of a separate project for Group Policy as a tactical and temporary solution. In my opinion, it does not make sense to have the Group Policy as a separate project outside Neutron (unless the new project is aiming to replace Neutron and I do not think anybody is suggesting that

[openstack-dev] [Manila]

Which of file system appliances are supported as of today? We are thinking to integrate with our cloud. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] how to provide tests environments for python things that require C extensions

I agree with Flavio. This looks really cool, and I had a very similar idea recently. I'll try to find some time to give this a whirl. -Dave On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 09/05/2014 04:21 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 09/05/2014 06:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> Wh

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Status of Neutron at Juno-3

Kyle, Please consider an FFE for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-hierarchical-port-binding. This was discussed extensively at Wednesday's ML2 meeting, where the consensus was that it would be valuable to get this into Juno if possible. The patches have had core reviews from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-driver-numa-placement

On 09/05/2014 04:48 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: Quick response as not to hijack the thread: I think we all agree on the benefits of having resources you can turn off and on at will. I don't agree at all. There's no cost whatsoever in "turning on" a resource. It doesn't need to be extensible. Re

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [FFE] Final Libvirt User Namespaces Patch

On 09/05/2014 09:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:49:20PM +, Andrew Melton wrote: Hey Devs, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94915/ This feature is the final patch set for the User Namespace BP (https://bluepri

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Coraid CI system

+1 from me (Cinder core) On 5 September 2014 15:09, Mykola Grygoriev wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Mykola Grygoriev and I'm engineer who currently working on > deploying 3d party CI for Сoraid Сinder driver. > > Following instructions on > > http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requesting-a-ser

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

I'm willing to sponsor this Chris — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Day, Phil wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for > server groups. > Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful > anti-affinity filter

  1   2   3   >