Which of file system appliances are supported as of today? We are thinking
to integrate with our cloud.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Robert Kukura kuk...@noironetworks.com wrote:
Kyle,
Please consider an FFE for
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-hierarchical-port-binding.
This was discussed extensively at Wednesday's ML2 meeting, where the
consensus was that it would be
Kekane, Abhishek wrote:
[...]
If we have this feature in glance then we can able to use features like
reload glance configuration file without restart, graceful shutdown etc.
Also it will use common code like other OpenStack projects nova,
keystone, cinder does.
I think it makes a lot of
Hi Jyoti
This is the wrong email list: we use openstack-dev only to discuss
future development of OpenStack project. Use the General mailing list
or the one for Operators (check http://lists.openstack.org).
Alternatively search for answers (and if you don't find any, ask
questions) on
Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to request a FFE for 2 features I've been working on during
Juno which, unfortunately, haven been delayed for different reasons
during this time.
[...]
I would be inclined to give both a chance, but they really need to merge
quickly, and the
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 10:26 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
2. Removal of drivers other than the reference implementation for each
project could be the healthiest option
a. Requires transparent, public, automated 3'rd party CI
b. Requires a TRUE plugin architecture and mentality
Hi!
I've decided that as I have problems with OpenStack while using it in
the service of Infra, I'm going to just start spamming the list.
Please make something like this:
neutron security-group-create default --allow-every-damn-thing
Right now, to make security groups get the hell out of
2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil philip@hp.com:
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for
server groups.
Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful
anti-affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to
Not sure how this is done, but I'm a core member for Sahara, and I
hereby sponsor it.
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:57 -0400, Michael McCune wrote:
hey folks,
I am requesting an exception for the Swift trust authentication blueprint[1].
This blueprint addresses a security bug in Sahara and
I look at what we do with Ironic testing current as a guide here.
We have tempest job that runs against Nova, that validates changes
to nova don't break the separate Ironic git repo. So my thought
is that all our current tempest jobs would simply work in that
way. IOW changes to so called
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:25:09AM -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 10:26 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
2. Removal of drivers other than the reference implementation for each
project could be the healthiest option
a. Requires transparent, public, automated
I'm glad to announce Juno-3 release of Murano:
https://launchpad.net/murano/+milestone/juno-3
We've implemented 8 blueprints and closed 50 bugs. Thanks a lot to
everyone who worked on this milestone. All these efforts helped to
significantly improve quality and test-coverage of the project!
-1 from me (non-cinder core)
It very nice to see you're making progress. I, personally, was very confused
about voting.
Here's my understanding: Voting: it is the ability to provide an official +1
-1 vote in the gerrit system.
I don't see a stable history [1]. Before requesting voting, you
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:20:14PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote:
On 5 September 2014 13:59, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that
this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already
sponsored it,
Smaller review teams don't really need to line up core sponsors as much
as Nova does. As long as Sergey and myself are fine with it, you can go
for it. I'm +1 on this one becauise it's actually a security bug we need
to plug before release.
Trevor McKay wrote:
Not sure how this is done, but I'm
I believe your request matches this, and I agree
it'd be something good
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/default-rules-for-default-security-group
And also, the fact that we have hardcoded default
security group settings. It would be good to have
a system wide default security
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Kekane, Abhishek
abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com wrote:
Hi Erno,
I agree that we must document what all config parameters will be reloaded
after SIGHUP signal is processed, that's the reason why we have added
DocImpact tag to patch
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:42:17AM +1200, Steve Baker wrote:
On 05/09/14 04:51, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 04:32:53PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:45:59AM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/29/2014 05:15 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 29/08/14 14:27,
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Monty Taylor wrote:
The tl;dr is it's like tox, except it uses docker instead of virtualenv -
which means we can express all of our requirements, not just pip ones.
Oh thank god[1].
Seriously.
jogo started a thread about what matters for kilo and I was going
to respond
On 09/05/2014 12:05 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Monty Taylor wrote:
The tl;dr is it's like tox, except it uses docker instead of
virtualenv - which means we can express all of our requirements, not
just pip ones.
Oh thank god[1].
Seriously.
jogo started a thread about
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I've decided that as I have problems with OpenStack while using it in the
service of Infra, I'm going to just start spamming the list.
User CLI/API feedback!
neutron security-group-create default
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 8:50 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE] [nova] Barbican key manager wrapper
On 09/05/2014 08:11 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/05/2014 07:51 AM, Daniel P.
The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1 so its kind of just a question of
getting the sequence right.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05
Well, I and I believe a few others feel a slightly higher sense of urgency
about splitting out the scheduler but I don't want to hijack this thread for
that debate. Fair warning, I intend to start a new thread where we can talk
specifically about the scheduler split, I'm afraid we're in the
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of oslotest 1.1.0.0a2, the
latest version of the oslo library with test base classes and fixtures.
This release includes:
* Add fixture for mock.patch.multiple
* Ensure that mock.patch.stopall is called last
* Remove differences between Python
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Tim Bell wrote:
The one concern I have with a small core is that there is not an easy
way to assess the maturity of a project on stackforge. The stackforge
projects may be missing packaging, Red Hat testing, puppet
On 09/05/2014 12:10 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:42:17AM +1200, Steve Baker wrote:
On 05/09/14 04:51, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 04:32:53PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:45:59AM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/29/2014 05:15
On 09/05/2014 03:52 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
So my biggest fear with a model where each team had their own full
Nova tree and did large pull requests, is that we'd suffer major
pain during the merging of large pull requests, especially if any
of the merges touched common code. It could
I'm +1 on the FFE for both of these branches.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/05/2014 05:20 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to request a FFE for 2 features I've been working on during
Juno which,
Hi all,
as planned[1] stable-maint team is going to prepare the final stable
Havana release 2013.2.4, now that Juno-3 was released.
Proposed release date is Sep 18, with the code freeze on stable/havana
branches week before on Sep 11.
Stable-maint members: please review open backports [2] taking
Hello dear cinder stackers,
Recently, the feature freeze was acted for J3, while I was frantically
trying to tighten the feedback loop on the driver I was working on for
my company, Scality, in hope of getting merged for J3.
I felt I was really close, a lot of reviews coming in the last few
On Sep 5, 2014, at 10:21 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
Hi all,
Between recent IRC meetings and the mid-cycle operators meetup, we've
heard things ranging from is the SDK project still around to I
can't wait for this. I'm Brian Curtin from Rackspace and I'd like to
tell you what
For those of you playing the home game ... just added four new screencasts to
the StackTach.v3 playlist.
These are technical deep dives into the code added over the last week or so,
with demos.
For the more complex topics I spend a little time on the background and
rationale.
StackTach.v3:
Hi German,
Thanks for your reply! My responses are in-line below, and of course you
should feel free to counter my counter-points. :)
For anyone else paying attention and interested in expressing a voice here,
we'll probably be voting on this subject at next week's Octavia meeting.
On Thu, Sep
Hi
In Rally is there a way to run parallel scenarios?
I know the scenario can support concurrency but I am talking about running
multiple such scenarios themselves in parallel
Ajay
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 09/05/2014 10:06 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 09/05/2014 06:29 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
Scheduler: I think we need to split out the scheduler with a similar
level of urgency. We keep blocking features on the split, because we
know we don't have the review bandwidth to deal with them. Right now I
PTL Election details:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Elections_September/October_2014
TC Election details:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TC_Elections_October_2014
Please read the stipulations and timelines for candidates and electorate
contained in these wikipages.
There will be an
Hey guys,
I just noticed that Amphora won the vote. I have several issues with
this.
1) Amphora wasn't in the first list of items to vote on. I'm confused as
to how it ended up in the final round. The fact that it did makes me
feel like the first round of votes were totally disregarded.
2) The
We have a couple of requests for all of you planning to attend the 18-19th
September Policy Mid-cycle summit.
1. We’re planning on starting with a series of talks describing the state of
policy (current and possibly future) in different projects. We've confirmed
people for talks on the
On 2014-09-04 16:17:04 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote:
[...]
* Your terminal is an actual terminal -- Gertty works just fine
in 80 columns, but it is also happy to spread out into hundreds
of columns for ideal side-by-side diffing.
* Colors -- you think ANSI escape sequences are
Hi Cinder Folks,
I would like to request a FFE for cinder pools support with the NetApp
drivers[1][2].
We began working on this patch as soon as Winstons pool-aware scheduler
changes[3] became stable and this patch is ready now that Winstons code has
been merged. These changes have been well
Hi Jorge,
That was totally my bad. Since we had lukewarm to *no* consensus on the
original list, I had a late inspiration to see if people liked the idea of
using a Roman container name, given our project has a Roman name.
Everyone on IRC was in favor, though that could’ve also just been
If I take a recent case we had, we’re looking for ways to simplify backup for
our users. They should not have to write crons to do snapshots but leave that
to a service.
Raksha seems promising… a wiki page on openstack.org, code in github etc.
How can the average deployer know whether a
On 09/05/2014 03:01 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 09/05/2014 10:06 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 09/05/2014 06:29 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
Scheduler: I think we need to split out the scheduler with a similar
level of urgency. We keep blocking features on the split, because we
know we don't have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unrestricted write permission to config files can allow code execution
- ---
### Summary ###
In numerous places throughout OpenStack projects, variables are read
directly from configuration files and used to construct statements
which are executed
On 09/05/2014 04:43 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 09/05/2014 10:33 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Hi Mykola,
On 09/05/2014 04:09 PM, Mykola Grygoriev wrote:
Hi,
My name is Mykola Grygoriev and I'm engineer who currently working on
deploying 3d party CI for Сoraid Сinder driver.
Great, thanks!
On 09/05/2014 11:20 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 5 September 2014 13:59, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that
this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already
sponsored it, and as per [1] cores
On 9/5/2014 5:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
We just hit feature freeze[1], so please do not approve changes that add
features or new configuration options unless those have been granted a
feature freeze exception.
This is also string freeze[2], so you should avoid changing
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/04/2014 10:25 PM, Solly Ross wrote:
Anyway, I think it would be useful to have some sort of page where people
could say I'm an SME in X, ask me for reviews and then patch
submitters could go
and say, oh, I
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson geekinu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am requesting an exception for the juno-slaveification blueprint. There
is a single outstanding patch [1] which has already been approved before,
but needed to be re-spun due to gate failures which then
Not sure if the patch to make the ssh strict policy setting configurable
needed an official ffe. It merged after the tag so I wanted to cover my
bases.
This is my request.
Thanks!
Jay
https://review.openstack.org/114336
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Hey all!
A few of quick notes about PyPI mirrors and the gate.
Firstly - today we just rolled out per-cloud-region mirrors. Hopefully
this eliminate issues we have from time to time with connections to PyPI
timing out. We have a selector script running on node creation, so nodes
in, say,
Matt,
I don't think that is the right solution.
If the string changes I think the only problem is it won't be translated if
it is thrown. That is better than breaking the coding standard imho.
Jay
On Sep 5, 2014 3:30 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 9/5/2014 5:10
All the other patches from this blueprint have merged, the only
remaining patch really just needs a +W as it has been extensively
reviewed and already approved previously. This may be an easy
candidate since Andrew Laski, Jay Pipes and Dan Smith have reviewed
and +2'd this
I am also happy to sponsor it. I've already reviewed the patches...
On 09/05/2014 04:34 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson geekinu...@gmail.com
mailto:geekinu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am requesting an exception for the juno-slaveification
Thirding sponsorship.
I didn¹t review as much as the other two, but I helped merge a couple of
the patches. Agreed with Jay otherwise; we¹re almost there, let¹s finish
it.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Hello,
I am requesting an exception for the Horizon Cinder QOS Specs blueprint[1].
The blueprint addresses adding QOS Spec management in Horizon and completely
covers the Cinder QOS CLI commands.
There are 4 patches that implement this blueprint, the first of which has
already landed in Juno.
Approved.
Michael
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Matt Dietz matt.di...@rackspace.com wrote:
Thirding sponsorship.
I didn¹t review as much as the other two, but I helped merge a couple of
the patches. Agreed with Jay otherwise; we¹re almost there, let¹s finish
it.
-Original
Well, I'm definitely down to do some work on something like that
(especially since the original quote was from me ;-)). Perhaps we
should split this off into a separate thread and have some design/feature
discussions once the mad rush to get Juno out the door dies down?
Best Regards,
Solly
Approved.
Michael
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am also happy to sponsor it. I've already reviewed the patches...
On 09/05/2014 04:34 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson geekinu...@gmail.com
Hi,
I've built this handy dandy list of granted FFEs, because searching
email to find out what is approved is horrible. It would be good if
people with approved FFEs could check their thing is listed here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-nova-approved-ffes
Michael
--
Rackspace
For better or for worse we have already merged about half of the
patches for this series, so I think stopping now because of concerns
about CI is pretty arbitrary. I do think Sean's point about scheduler
tests outside of tempest is valid though and I'd like to see it
reflected in the review
Hi Stephen,
I think this is a good discussion to have and will make it more clear why we
chose a specific design. I also believe by having this discussion we will make
the design stronger. I am still a little bit confused what the
driver/controller/amphora agent roles are. In my driver-less
The Glance where are the docs? wiki page has been updated:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-where-are-the-docs
By the way, the Docs Team is having a bug-squash day on 9th September 2014 if
you feel like writing prose instead of python:
The DefCore project is moving forward and needs more and more eyes on
it. The next meetings are on Sept 9 and 10, with the same agenda to
facilitate global access.
I'm sharing the details below. All members of OpenStack ecosystem should
follow this process closely as it is going to define what an
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Jay Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net
wrote:
Not sure if the patch to make the ssh strict policy setting configurable
needed an official ffe. It merged after the tag so I wanted to cover my
bases.
This is my request.
Thanks!
Jay
So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers?
Michael
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1 so its kind of just a question of
Hi Ajay,
Rally as of now does not support launching different scenarios in parallel;
implementing this functionality is, however, one of the major points in our
roadmap (see this blueprint
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/rally/+spec/benchmark-runners-at-large-scale),
since being able to produce
Hey Everyone,
I was trying to just use Launchpad to track these but there's been requests
for an etherpad similar to what Mikal put together. So here it is [1]
Thanks,
John
[1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-cinder-approved-ffes
___
I looked at the Tempest change, it should be landable. I'll sign up for
review on these, as the rest of the patches are pretty straight forward.
-Sean
On 09/05/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Still wrote:
So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers?
Michael
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at
Hi Richard,
I¹ll review your changes. You still have to get one more core to agree to
review the patches though. Good luck!
-Lin
From: Hagarty, Richard (ESSN Storage MSDU) richard.haga...@hp.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Friday, September 5, 2014 at 3:09
+1 to what Jay said.
I’m not sure whether the string freeze applies to bugs, but the defect that
Matt mentioned (for which I authored the fix) adds a string, albeit to fix a
bug. Hoping it’s more desirable to have an untranslated correct message than a
translated incorrect message. :-)
-
Hi German,
Responses in-line:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Eichberger, German german.eichber...@hp.com
wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I think this is a good discussion to have and will make it more clear why
we chose a specific design. I also believe by having this discussion we
will make the
On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Marco Fargetta wrote:
I understand the general idea and the motivations but I am not sure
about the implementation. Even with a SPA you still need to provide
credentials and manage tokens for the authentication/authorisation in
a way not too much different from the
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 08:02 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/05/2014 07:40 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:12:37AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/05/2014 06:40 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
A handy example of this I can think of is the currently granted FFE for
serial
Daniel,
Thanks for the well thought out and thorough proposal to help Nova.
As an OpenStack operator/developer since Cactus time, it has definitely
gotten harder and harder to get fixes in Nova for small bugs that we find
running at scale with production systems. This forces us to maintain more
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 14:14 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
For a long time I've use the LKML 'subsystem maintainers' model as the
reference point for ideas. In a more LKML like model, each virt team
(or other subsystem team) would have their own separate GIT repo
Hi,
I would like to request a feature freeze exception for the first part of the
use-libvirt-storage-pools blueprint [1].
Overview
The patches in question [2] would entail adding support for libvirt storage
pools,
but neither making them default nor adding in automatic transitioning
Thus, it get approved and added to the etherpad of doom.
Michael
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I looked at the Tempest change, it should be landable. I'll sign up for
review on these, as the rest of the patches are pretty straight forward.
-Sean
I too agree this can be useful beyond openstack.
It will great if one of you (experts) can explain in more details how the
python virtual environment is heavyweight than docker containers.
I am just a user of devstack without the nitty gritty details of its inner
workings.
However, I can say
I will be the third here. Approved and added to the etherpad of doom.
Michael
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 09/05/2014 07:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:28:55AM +, Bohai (ricky) wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a feature
I deployed a server having three drives using TripleO. How can I know which
disk is root disk? I need this information as I have a utility which will
format all drives except root disk. Utility is being used for some solution
we are developing using machines deployed by TripleO.
Regards,
Jyoti
101 - 182 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
