On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 09:06 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/07/2014 08:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
It seems to me that the tension here is that there are groups who
would really like to use features in newer libvirts that we don't CI
on in the gate. Is it naive to think that a possible
Hi,
During the build of oslo packages for OpenStack, I'm having the issue
that python3 seems to first look into
/usr/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/olso, finds stuff in it, and then do
not search in the local directory. Because of that, unit tests are
failing during the build. For example, when
I agree with Doug as well. We should update the current patch. Susanne
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
I took a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105331/ and had one
minor issue which I think can be addressed. Prior to approving we need to
Hi Sumit,
First I want to say I'm not opposed to GBP itself, but has many confusion
about it's core resource model and how it will integrate with neutron core.
Do you mean for whatever GBP backend configured in any future Neutron
deployment, so long as they are in tree, then ML2 core plugin
Great notes! thanks it helped me catch up after vacation. :)
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
On where to capture notes like this long-term: I would say the wiki is
more searchable for now. When we make the transition to IRC meetings, then
the
Hello,
I 'm trying to create a simple stack with heat (Icehouse release).
The template contains SoftwareConfig, SoftwareDeployment and a single
server resources.
The problem is that the SoftwareDeployment resource is always in progress !
After waiting for more than an hour the stack deployment
gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
only one think i didn't like it
why all url,api, etc has to include the word 'preview'?
i imagine that i would be consuming the new feature using heat, puppet,
local scripts, custom horizon, whatever. Why do you make me to change
all them when the feature moves
Hello,
Right now, i customerized keystone to meet our requeriments. I want to add
some configuration options in keystone.conf.sample. But, i
do not find generate_sample.sh in directory tools in Havana keystone. So i want
to know how to generate conf sample in havana keystone.
I know, i can
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-08-08 09:43:54 -0700 (-0700), Devananda van der Veen wrote:
[...]
this sounds like it will also solve the current problem when a
core reviewer has gone on vacation after blocking something for
procedural reasons.
I don't really think so, unless I'm
Gang,
I was asked the following questions around our Neutron LBaaS use cases:
1. Will there be a scenario where the “VIP” port will be in a different
Node, from all the Member “VMs” in a pool.
2. Also how likely is it for the LBaaS configured subnet to not have a
“router” and just use the
Hi,
we're running only 3 containers in privileged mode: cobbler, rsyslog and
mcollective. Running all the containers in privileged mode is not a good
idea for security reasons. Docker manages DNAT forwarding itself, so it
does not create any overhead for us.
Is there any real benefits of using
Eoghan Glynn wrote:
The TC has begun to scrutinize new projects more carefully on
technical grounds, particularly since some recently-integrated
projects have run into scaling limitations that have hampered their
adoption. I believe this sort of technical guidance (or curation, if
you will)
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 06:46:13PM -0400, Solly Ross wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there was a way to get a non-readonly connection
to libvirt when running the unit tests
on the CI. If I call `LibvirtDriver._connect(LibvirtDriver.uri())`,
it works fine locally, but the upstream
CI barfs
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 08:57:31AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2014-08-08 09:06:29 -0400 (-0400), Russell Bryant wrote:
[...]
We've seen several times that building and maintaining 3rd party
CI is a *lot* of work.
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 09:06:29AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/07/2014 08:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
It seems to me that the tension here is that there are groups who
would really like to use features in newer libvirts that we don't CI
on in the gate. Is it naive to think that a
Moving to host networking would reduce our ability to do zero downtime
upgrades in the future. It means you must kill the old container in
order to start the new one, rather than allowing for the possibility
to remap the network configuration in iptables. It's something we
don't have now, but we
In the past there was smokestack that used a fedora version of libvirt.
Any idea what happened to that?
On 8/11/14, 12:53 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 09:06:29AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/07/2014 08:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
It seems to
Hi:
Continuing from last week's LBaaS meeting...
Currently an entity cannot be sent to driver unless it is linked to
loadbalancer because loadbalancer is the root object and driver information is
only available with loadbalancer.
The request to the driver is delayed because of which error
On 08/11/2014 05:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
There is work to add support for this in devestack already which I
prefer since it makes it easy for developers to get an environment
which matches the build system:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108714/
Ah, cool. Devstack is indeed a
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 07:58:41AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/11/2014 05:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
There is work to add support for this in devestack already which I
prefer since it makes it easy for developers to get an environment
which matches the build system:
On 08/09/2014 12:33 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-08-08 09:06:29 -0400 (-0400), Russell Bryant wrote:
[...]
We've seen several times that building and maintaining 3rd party
CI is a *lot* of work.
Building and maintaining *any* CI is a *lot* of work, not the least
of which is the
On 08/11/2014 07:58 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/11/2014 05:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
There is work to add support for this in devestack already which I
prefer since it makes it easy for developers to get an environment
which matches the build system:
On 08/11/2014 08:01 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 07:58:41AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/11/2014 05:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
There is work to add support for this in devestack already which I
prefer since it makes it easy for developers to get an
On 2014-08-11 11:02:52 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
Ideally we'd want a blocking vote that carries over patchsets, but which
can be set or unset by any core/driver/ptl (to be determined). So if the
PTL sets the procedural Workflow-2 at feature freeze, I can clear it
when RC1 is
Hi,
At the moment all of the drivers are required CI support. Are there any plans
regarding the PIC support. I understand that this is something that requires
specific hardware. Are there any plans to add this?
Thanks
Gary
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
loy wolfe [mailto:loywo...@gmail.com] wrote:
Then since Network/Subnet/Port will never be treated just as LEGACY
COMPATIBLE role, there is no need to extend Nova-Neutron interface to
follow the GBP resource. Anyway, one of optional service plugins inside
Neutron shouldn't has any impact on Nova
On 2014-08-11 08:04:34 -0400 (-0400), Russell Bryant wrote:
Dang, I'd love to see those numbers. :-)
Me too. Now that I'm not travelling I'll see if I can find out what
he meant by that.
Understood. Some questions ... is building an image that has libvirt
and qemu pre-installed from source
Unfortunately, there is no way to generate a sample conf in the Havana
release. The etc/keystone.conf.sample included in Havana was maintained
manually. In icehouse (and master), you can generate a sample configuration
file using tox:
$ tox -e sample_config
Or run generate_sample.sh directly
There were no proposals for additional backports for sahara 2014.1.2,
so, I'm going to release it later today.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hey sahara folks,
I'm going to push 2014.1.2 tag to stable/icehouse branch next week,
so, please,
On 08/11/2014 09:17 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-08-11 08:04:34 -0400 (-0400), Russell Bryant wrote:
Dang, I'd love to see those numbers. :-)
Me too. Now that I'm not travelling I'll see if I can find out what
he meant by that.
Understood. Some questions ... is building an image
Hey sahara folks,
the latest sahara client release was at Mar 29 (right after the fully
completed renaming process) and so we have a lot of unreleased fixes
and improvements.
You can check diff [0] and launchpad's release page [1].
I'm going to release 0.7.1 this week, so, please propose
On 2014-08-11 08:07:02 -0400 (-0400), Russell Bryant wrote:
There's a pypi mirror at least. I'm not sure about mirroring
other things.
Right, that's a specific solution for mirroring the pypi.python.org
cheeseshop. We've got our (Infra) sights set on mirroring Ubuntu and
CentOS package
Hi,
I want to ask about neutron and designate integration.
I think dnsmasq fowards DNS request from instance to designate is better.
++
|DNS server(designate) |
++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nova Networking does not enforce security group rules following a soft
reboot of an instance
- ---
### Summary ###
In deployments using Nova Networking, security group rules associated
with an instance may not be enforced after a soft reboot. Nova is
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:45:56PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-08-11 08:07:02 -0400 (-0400), Russell Bryant wrote:
There's a pypi mirror at least. I'm not sure about mirroring
other things.
Right, that's a specific solution for mirroring the pypi.python.org
cheeseshop. We've got
Hi,
Validations such as timeout delay should be performed on the API level
before it reaches the driver.
For a configuration tree (lb, listeners, pools, etc.), there should be one
provider.
Having provider defined in multiple places does not make sense.
-San.
From: Vijay Venkatachalam
On 2014-08-11 14:56:27 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
If there are specific things we could do to libvirt.org / qemu.org
download sites, to make mirroring easier or more reliable for
OpenStack, we could certainly explore options there, since we know
the right people involved in both
Gary,
Cisco is adding it in our CI testbed. I guess that mlnx is doing the same for
their MD as well.
—Robert
On 8/11/14, 9:05 AM, Gary Kotton
gkot...@vmware.commailto:gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
At the moment all of the drivers are required CI support. Are there any plans
regarding the
Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] wrote:
On 9 August 2014 10:16, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul, does this friend of a friend have a reproduceable test
script for this?
We would also need to know the OpenStack release where this issue manifest
itself. A number of bugs have been
Ok， thank you all the same.
At 2014-08-11 09:31:19, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no way to generate a sample conf in the Havana release.
The etc/keystone.conf.sample included in Havana was maintained manually. In
icehouse (and master), you can generate a
Thanks for the update.
From: Robert Li (baoli) ba...@cisco.commailto:ba...@cisco.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, August 11, 2014 at 5:08 PM
To: OpenStack List
On 08/10/2014 10:36 PM, Jay Lau wrote:
I was asking this because I got a -2 for
https://review.openstack.org/109505 , just want to know why this new
term metadetails was invented when we already have details,
metadata, system_metadata, instance_metadata, and properties (on
images and volumes).
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2014-08-10 15:33:26 -0700:
On 02/08/14 04:07, Allison Randal wrote:
A few of us have been independently experimenting with Ansible as a
backend for TripleO, and have just decided to try experimenting
together. I've chatted with Robert, and he says that
Thanks, Paul!
On 08/11/2014 10:10 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote:
Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] wrote:
On 9 August 2014 10:16, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul, does this friend of a friend have a reproduceable test
script for this?
We would also need to know the OpenStack
As the person who -2'd the review, I'm thankful you raised this issue on
the ML, Jay. Much appreciated.
The metadetails term isn't being invented in this patch, of course. I
originally complained about the difference when this was being added:
On 08/11/2014 11:06 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
As the person who -2'd the review, I'm thankful you raised this issue on
the ML, Jay. Much appreciated.
The metadetails term isn't being invented in this patch, of course. I
originally complained about the difference when this was being added:
On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming along nicely, but
it is also about the lack of signals to control rebuild, poor support
for addressing machines as groups, and
On 8/11/14, 4:52 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
only one think i didn't like it
why all url,api, etc has to include the word 'preview'?
i imagine that i would be consuming the new feature using heat, puppet,
local scripts, custom horizon, whatever. Why do you make me
I just saw the agenda for tomorrow's TC meeting and we're on it. I plan to be
there.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Technical_Committee_meeting
-Ben
From: Swartzlander, Ben [mailto:ben.swartzlan...@netapp.com]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 9:53 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
We've moved all blueprints from 6.0 to 'next' milestone. It has been done
in order to better view of stuff that we really want to implement in 6.0.
Feature freeze for 6.0 release is planned to 18th of September. If you are
going to merge your blueprint before that date, you can move it to 6.0
All,
Please refer to this email for a list of information that has to be
populated in a blueprint before it can be assigned and scheduled:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/042042.html
Please don't schedule a blueprint to 6.0 until it has these details
and its
Yeah what I meant was the only solution I could come up with so that the
driver gets passed every call is to have the every entity have a
provider. I do believe this is a bit cumbersome for a user, and extra
validation would be needed to verify that two entities linked together
cannot have
Hi,
I have gone through devstack links.
They are not clear like openstack.org documents.
For Example:
when i am using below local.conf file in devstack,hp_msa_driver is not
coming in enabled_backends in cinder.conf after running stack.sh.
[[local|localrc]]
ADMIN_PASSWORD=vedams123
Hi all,
Validations such as ³timeout delay² should be performed on the API
level before it reaches the driver.
For a configuration tree (lb, listeners, pools, etc.), there should be one
provider.
You¹re right, but I think the point of Vijay¹s example was to highlight
the combo error problem
On 08/06/2014 05:48 PM, John Griffith wrote:
I have to agree with Duncan here. I also don't know if I fully
understand the limit in options. Stress test seems like it
could/should be different (again overlap isn't a horrible thing) and I
don't see it as siphoning off resources so not sure of
+2, yes please
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com
wrote:
All,
Please refer to this email for a list of information that has to be
populated in a blueprint before it can be assigned and scheduled:
On 8/11/14, 6:06 PM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
As the person who -2'd the review, I'm thankful you raised this issue on
the ML, Jay. Much appreciated.
The metadetails term isn't being invented in this patch, of course. I
originally complained about the difference when this was
Hi Susanne,
While there are a few operators involved with LBaaS that would have good
input, you might want to also ask this on the non-dev mailing list, for a
larger sample size.
Thanks,
doug
On 8/11/14, 3:05 AM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote:
Gang,
I was asked the following
Hi-
Today I contacted the service provider regarding the malware in the website.
Got a response that website is truly functional and malware free.
I too have verified all the directories, subdirectories and log files manually
for any malware injected into the website. I have detected none.
Hi Doug,
In some implementations Driver !== Device. I think this is also true for HA
Proxy.
This might mean that there is a difference between creating a logical object
and when there is enough information to actually schedule/place this into a
device.
The ability to express such errors
Hi Nikesh,
You need to set the enabled_backends in the local.conf file.
e.g.
[[post-config|$CINDER_CONF]]
[DEFAULT]
enabled_backends=hp_msa_driver
[hp_msa_driver]
volume_driver = cinder.volume.drivers.san.hp.hp_msa_fc.HPMSAFCDriver
…
Ramy
From: Nikesh Kumar Mahalka
Hi Sam,
Very true. I think that Vijay’s objection is that we are currently
imposing a logical structure on the driver, when it should be a driver
decision. Certainly, it goes both ways.
And I also agree that the mechanism for returning multiple errors, and the
ability to specify whether those
Le 11/08/2014 18:03, Gary Kotton a écrit :
On 8/11/14, 6:06 PM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
As the person who -2'd the review, I'm thankful you raised this issue on
the ML, Jay. Much appreciated.
The metadetails term isn't being invented in this patch, of course. I
originally
On 8/8/14, 6:28 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
If we want to keep everything the way it is, we have to change
everything [1]
This is pretty much how I felt after reading this proposal, and I felt
that this quote, which Ivar will probably appreciate, was apt to the
situation.
Recent events
kazuhiro MIYASHITA,
I have done a lot of thinking about this. I have a blueprint on hold
until Kilo for Neutron/Designate integration [1].
However, my blueprint doesn't quite address what you are going after
here. An assumption that I have made is that Designate is an external
or internet
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote:
One advantage of the service plugin is that one can leverage the
neutron common framework such as Keystone authentication where common
scoping is done.
kazuhiro MIYASHITA,
As designate progresses with server pools, we aim to have support for a
'private' dns server, that could run within a neutron network - is that
the level of integration you were referring to?
That is, for the time being, a long term goal, and not covered by Carl's
Kilo
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage from
oslo.concurrency?
I still don't understand how oslo.concurrency can be used as a library
with the configuration being set
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
cover is why InfluxDB (http://influxdb.com/) is not being leveraged.
Many folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem
space discussed below.
Thanks,
Brad
Brad Topol, Ph.D.
IBM
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming along nicely, but
it is also about the lack of signals to control
Hi Li, comments inline.
On 08/08/2014 12:03 AM, Li Ma wrote:
Getting a massive amount of information from data storage to be displayed is
where most of the activity happens in OpenStack. The two activities of reading
data and writing (creating, updating and deleting) data are fundamentally
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming
On 08/11/2014 01:02 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage from
oslo.concurrency?
I still don't understand how oslo.concurrency can be used
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday August 12th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone interested
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-08-11 11:40:07 -0700:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't
Hi, so shortly after the HOT migration landed, we hit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1354305 which is that on even
quite recently deployed clouds, the migrated templates were just too
new. A partial revert (of just the list_join bit) fixes that, but a
deeper problem emerged which is that
On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:22 PM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
That’s right. The preferred approach is to put the register_opt() in
*runtime* code somewhere before the option will be used. That
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. Many
folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem space
discussed below.
Great question Brad!
As it happens
Yes, the point was to say the plugin need not restrict and let driver decide
what to do with the API.
Even if the call was made to driver instantaneously, I understand, the driver
might decide to ignore
first and schedule later. But, if the call is present, there is scope for
validation.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com
wrote:
On 08/11/2014 01:02 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 06:58 +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi, so shortly after the HOT migration landed, we hit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1354305 which is that on even
quite recently deployed clouds, the migrated templates were just too
new. A partial revert (of just the list_join
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage
from oslo.concurrency?
I still don't understand how
On Aug 11, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. Many
folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem space
discussed
On 08/11/2014 02:20 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com
wrote:
On 08/11/2014 01:02 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Aug 11, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Yuriy Taraday
yorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow
Hi folks,
That actually going in opposite direction to what flavor framework is
trying to do (and for dispatching it's doing the same as providers). REST
call dispatching should really go via the root object.
I don't quite get the issue with health monitors. If HM is incorrectly
configured prior
I apologize for the delay in my response to this thread, between travelling
and having a stuck 'a' key on my laptop this is the earliest I could respond.
I opted for a separate branch on this thread to summarize my views and I'll
respond inline later on some of the previous discussion.
On Wed,
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
Many
folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem space
Hi Rajdeep,
What version of pip are you running? Please try installing the latest version
(https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html) and run 'sudo pip install -r
requirements.txt'.
- Peter
From: Rajdeep Dua rajdeep@gmail.commailto:rajdeep@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack
On 11/08/14 14:49, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-08-11 11:40:07 -0700:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
Right now we're stuck
On 08/11/2014 04:21 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
I apologize for the delay in my response to this thread, between
travelling
and having a stuck 'a' key on my laptop this is the earliest I could
respond.
I opted for a separate branch on this thread to summarize my views and
I'll
respond
Hi Eugene,
An example of the HM issue (and really this can happen with any entity)
is if the driver the API sends the configuration to does not actually
support the value of an attribute.
For example: Provider A support PING health monitor type, Provider B
does not. API allows the PING health
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
Hi!
James has run into an issue implementing the multi-hypervisor spec
(
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-specs/tree/specs/juno/tripleo-juno-deploy-cloud-hypervisor-type.rst
)
which we're hoping
On 8/11/2014 5:29 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
Many
folks feel that this technology is a viable
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Dina Belova has recently landed some infra patches[1,2] to create
an experimental mongodb-based Tempest job. This effectively just
overrides the ceilometer storage backend config so that mongodb
is
On 2014-08-11 5:13 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
Right, I'm not suggesting to remove the storage abstraction layer. I'm
just curious what gnocchi does better/different than InfluxDB?
I was at the OpenStack Design Summit when Gnocchi was presented.
Soon after the basic goals and technical details of
Susanne,
Are you asking in the context of Load Balancer services in general, or in
terms of the Neutron LBaaS project or the Octavia project?
Stephen
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Doug Wiegley do...@a10networks.com wrote:
Hi Susanne,
While there are a few operators involved with LBaaS
Hi stackers,
I would like to put some more details on current situation.
The issue is with what Rally is in it's
current form. It's scope is too large and monolithic, and it duplicates
much of
the functionality we either already have or need in current QA or Infra
projects. But, nothing
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does
not
cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
Many
folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem
space
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
